WTI crude is trading near $61.20 after a decline driven by rising US stockpiles and potential developments in the US-Iran nuclear deal. WTI saw an over 3% drop earlier, stabilising at $60.00, unable to recover beyond the 21-day EMA.

Bearish supply-side fundamentals and resistance levels contribute to the downward trajectory. Renewed hopes for an easing of sanctions on Iran could see increased oil supply, influencing global supply concerns and pricing.

Us Inventory Reports

US inventory reports have furthered this downward pressure. The EIA recorded a 3.5 million-barrel stockpile increase, counter to a forecasted 1.1 million-barrel draw, with the API noting a 4.3 million-barrel rise.

OPEC has adjusted its 2025 supply growth forecast from US and non-OPEC producers to 800,000 bpd, down from 900,000. Despite this, OPEC’s gradual output rise impacts price sentiment.

Technically, WTI faces range limits between $55.50 and $64.00, with recent attempts to breach $64.00 unsuccessful. Immediate support rests at $60.00, with a potential downside extending to $52.00 if breached.

Rally Requirements

A rally requires reclaiming the 21-day EMA, potentially testing $64.00 again. Sustaining this could unlock further gains toward $66.80.

Currently, West Texas Intermediate crude floats close to $61.20 per barrel, marking a modest pause after a sharp drop earlier in the week. This decline, over 3% earlier on, was largely provoked by a pair of compounding factors: rising U.S. oil inventories and the prospects tied to restored diplomatic dealings between Washington and Tehran. Crude momentarily steadied at $60.00, but efforts to regain upward traction faltered below the 21-day exponential moving average, a commonly watched metric signalling short-term momentum.

The inventory figures alone have drawn a fresh wave of scepticism towards any immediate recovery. Expectations had pointed to a drawdown of around 1.1 million barrels, but instead, the Energy Information Administration logged a jump of 3.5 million barrels. Tuesday’s report from the American Petroleum Institute reinforced the same tension, with a more substantial 4.3 million-barrel increase. In a period where fuel demand is not yet running hot, excess supply—whether realised or anticipated—is a drag on pricing strength.

From a medium-term perspective, the suggestion of potential sanction relief on Iran could open the gates for additional oil to hit the global market. Though indirect and still speculative, that kind of shift tends to loom large in weighing on speculative positioning.

Meanwhile, fresh projections from OPEC placed non-OPEC and U.S. supply growth next year at 800,000 barrels per day, a notch lower than their prior forecast of 900,000. Still, OPEC’s readiness to raise output in increments, although measured, is likely factored into traders’ outlook. It adds weight to the existing bearish tone, especially where demand remains uneven across key consuming regions.

Price-wise, WTI continues to oscillate within a defined corridor, largely trapped between $55.50 at the lower end and $64.00 at the top. Most recently, bulls struggled to push above that upper barrier, reinforcing this month’s trading limits. Immediate support can still be found at $60.00, with sharper declines possible if that level collapses—markets may then begin eyeing $52.00 as the next anchor.

To challenge the downtrend, futures would need to vault back above the 21-day EMA convincingly. If that occurs, the door nudges open for another retest of $64.00. Passing that ceiling, we’d look closely at $66.80, which previously acted as a distributive area. However, any bounce would require either a tightening of supply forecasts or a decisive shift in macro risk tone.

The coming sessions should offer more clarity as we digest inventory data, monitor the trajectory of nuclear diplomacy, and assess refining margins heading into peak seasonal demand. As always, it helps to stay nimble and protect capital in either direction.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Michael Barr indicated that the economy is currently stable. However, trade shocks could affect small businesses and lead to price increases if supply chains are disrupted or firms collapse.

Recent Producer Price Index data has influenced market expectations. There is now full anticipation of a 25 basis point interest rate increase in September.

Economic Indicators and Trade Shocks

What Barr effectively outlined was a fragile equilibrium—while the broader economy appears steady for now, it’s being quietly shaped by factors that could shift rapidly. His mention of trade shocks points directly to vulnerabilities that, if triggered, may ripple through smaller firms first. This could result in squeezes on inventory and disruptions in product movement. Practically, that means higher costs pushed onto consumers, and a strain on margins for businesses operating on tighter budgets. It’s easy to focus on headline stability, but under the surface, things are less quiet.

The latest Producer Price Index (PPI) data pushed expectations in one direction. The market has moved decisively, now fully pricing in a 25 basis point hike in September. That type of move spotlights the growing confidence among traders regarding the central bank’s tightening cycle. It’s not speculative anymore; it’s priced in as a near-certainty.

For those of us positioned in derivatives, the message here is less about the hike itself and more about the growing alignment between data and monetary reaction. When expectations tighten around a known outcome, price swings tend to become more sensitive to new variables. Volatility may compress in the short term, but surprise data or disruptions could provoke sharper reactions than we’ve seen recently.

Impact of Monetary Policies

With the rate hike expectation solidified, attention should shift to the post-September trajectory. If input costs continue edging upward, even slowly, that could extend the tightening path into the early part of next year. That’s worth watching, particularly for anyone holding positions sensitive to forward guidance.

In the meantime, the role of midsize businesses in the broader rate transmission mechanism shouldn’t be overlooked. These firms tend to react faster to changing risk conditions, especially when credit access becomes more restrictive. If lending tightens indirectly due to higher policy rates, those reactions can emerge quickly. We’d be looking at regional lending conditions and demand-side data for real clues here—less about headlines, more about how capital is flowing.

Jones, for instance, warned that the monetary policy effect might lag but arrives forcefully, often when confidence begins to decay rather than in the early stages of tightening. That historical pattern hasn’t shifted much. Traders familiar with prior cycles might recall the risk of underestimating lags—especially if they’ve built positions around quicker feedback loops.

Now that PPI and rate forecasts are aligned, implied volatility may remain relatively tame—until new shocks come into play. Any fresh disruptions, even those perceived as isolated, could break the present calm. That’s not alarmism, just pattern consistency.

From our perspective, risk modelling now benefits more from disaggregation—not just looking at aggregates like core inflation, but watching structural variables such as trucking loads, supplier payments, or short-term credit spreads. These show movement long before the major indicators respond. It aids in getting ahead without relying solely on lagging macro averages.

What we’ve got now is not an all-clear signal. It’s an expectation moulded by recent, clearer indicators. And it gives us a narrow window to prepare for moves that don’t yet sit on anyone’s calendar.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Technical Analysis Of The US Dollar Index

The US Dollar Index shows indecision, trading between 100.59 and 101.05. Indicators like RSI and MACD suggest mild buy momentum, but the broader outlook is bearish. Key support levels are at 100.62, 100.59, and 100.56, while resistance is seen at 100.92, 101.34, and 101.81. A breakout above 101.90 or below 100.22 could indicate the next directional move.

The USD is the world’s most traded currency, accounting for over 88% of global foreign exchange turnover, averaging $6.6 trillion in transactions per day as of 2022. The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy, including interest rate adjustments, significantly impacts the USD’s value.

The current reading on the US Dollar Index (DXY), hovering just below 101.00, reflects a subdued mood in the currency markets. Looking at the latest economic figures, we saw retail sales barely advanced, with an increase of only 0.1% in April — underwhelming at best when considering recent seasonal trends. In parallel, the Producer Price Index slowed to 2.4% annually, which was weaker than markets had anticipated. Unemployment claims held steady, staying close to 229,000, and only a slight tick-up in continued claims was observed.

Powell addressed the public with some revised messaging, hinting at shifts in the Federal Reserve’s communication around inflation and the employment picture. However, his remarks failed to stir the markets in any measurable way. What appears to be commanding more attention are the growing murmurs of possible currency interventions in Asia, alongside geopolitical concerns — specifically, the apparent deadlock in negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. In response, the DXY drifted slightly lower to 100.80, as markets increasingly price in the likelihood of a rate cut from the Fed later in the year, with many eyeing September as a potential window.

Key Market Observations And Strategies

Looking at the chart patterns, the DXY shows reluctance to commit in either direction. It’s been lingering in a narrow band between 100.59 and 101.05, anchoring sentiment to a wait-and-see mode. Momentum signals are hardly persuasive; the RSI remains neutral-leaning, while MACD reflects the faintest buying tilt — though far from strong enough to suggest a carry-through. Structurally, the prevailing trend remains tilted to the downside. If price action were to press below 100.22, a more defined decline could follow, while a push above 101.90 might flip the tone temporarily more constructive. Until then, we’re boxed in.

Support lines are narrowly packed between 100.62 and 100.56, making this a soft floor that could give way with little provocation. Resistance sits higher at 100.92 and then more meaningfully at 101.81 — a level that has historically seen supply enter. Even small external shocks could tip the balance.

From our view, the conditions suggest that shorter-term directional bets are best approached with caution. Maintain flexible positioning, with attention to geopolitical developments that don’t always reflect directly in economic releases but can redirect flows quite quickly. Rate expectations may continue to oscillate as each data print emerges, but what matters most is how those expectations recalibrate in real time. Reading the bond market’s response might offer earlier clues than traditional macro prints alone.

Volumes remain suppressed during key DXY turning points, another factor that limits conviction in either direction. No need to chase either side aggressively here — waiting for more decisive price action around the edges of the cited range may present clearer setups. That being said, speculative participation could increase if we see a break from this current band, particularly in the event of unexpected policy comments out of the Fed or unexpected developments in Asia.

Downside pressure could accelerate swiftly if triggered by dovish messaging from key policymakers — this has been the pattern in previous such environments — while upside drivers likely require a more hawkish tilt or a sharp deterioration in risk assets. Until then, we’re in for slow structural drift, marked by short bursts of volatility, often disconnected from fundamentals. Be ready for mispriced reactions.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Canada’s S&P TSX index reached a new all-time high at 25,889.46, closing at 25,882.41, up 190 points or 0.74% for the day. Previously, the high was 25,875.61 on 30th January, with another notable point at 25,808.25.

After the January peak, the index dropped by 14.10%, retracing around 50% of the upward movement from October 2023 before rebounding to new highs. The index has increased by 4.69% this trading year, following a rise of 17.99% in 2024.

Us Indices Performance

The US major indices showed gains on the same day. The Dow industrial average rose by 215 points or 0.51%, reaching 42,266.78. The S&P index increased by 28.23 points or 0.48% to 5,921, while the NASDAQ index climbed by 44.47 points or 0.23% to 19,191.71.

In 2025, the Dow and NASDAQ remain negative, but the S&P index shows a positive trend. Year-to-date in 2025, the Dow is down 0.70%, the S&P index is up 0.65%, and the NASDAQ is down 0.63%. For 2024, these indices had impressive increases, with the Dow up 12.88%, S&P up 23.31%, and NASDAQ up 28.64%.

This article tells us that Canada’s primary equity index has managed to set a new peak, edging past its previous record from late January. That previous high had marked a resistance point until now. Following that, markets experienced a pronounced downward correction — specifically, a fall of just over 14%. That sized drop is not unusual and fits cleanly with a technical retracement of the rally that began in October of last year. From that low, prices gradually regained lost ground, eventually pushing beyond January’s top.

So far this year, the index has added just under five percent, which may seem modest compared with the double-digit surge in the previous year, but it suggests that the upward momentum is still persisting, albeit more measured. Typically, after a year of strong performance like 2024, it’s not abnormal for gains to come at a slower pace. The key idea here is that prices are not falling away after touching previous highs — they’re instead building on them.

Market Trends and Volatility

Across our southern border, the major US indices had another day of climbing, with the Dow, S&P and the tech-heavy NASDAQ all closing higher. While Tuesday’s moves were relatively contained, they extended a broader trend of tentative optimism. However, when we glance at the numbers from the start of this year, only one of those indices — the broad-based S&P — is running ahead. This tells us that price action has been very specific and probably driven by selective sector strength, rather than uniform buying across the board.

If we look back at 2024, the growth in US equity benchmarks was far above historical averages, especially in the NASDAQ which had led with gains of nearly 29 percent. When such strong prior-year performances take place, there’s often a digestion period — a sort of pausing — before the next clear leg of movement emerges.

Now, if we step into the position of market participants in derivatives who monitor these patterns and price levels closely, these movements suggest that confidence hasn’t fully left risk assets. What matters here is not just the higher closes, but how calculated and orderly they’ve been. No panic buying, no signs of runaway moves — just steady ticks higher.

With that in mind, given where these indices are now trading relative to their prior peaks and post-correction lows, we’re likely watching for stability in key support zones before establishing any new directional conviction. The reflexive nature of equity indices to reset before embarking on another directional push is something we’ve seen play out over countless quarters.

This also brings attention to how volatility should behave. If realised volatility remains contained, and no spike appears unexpectedly on the horizon, pricing in lower downside premiums might make sense. That is particularly so if we see call spreads begin widening across contracts, which we’re inclined to monitor next.

One cannot ignore the tendency for traders to overreact to modest macro updates during quieter periods — especially in early Q2. So when we price forward volatility or directional bets, it’s worth considering that markets like these, that have managed to scale or hold above previous highs after retracements, are unlikely to break down immediately unless a fresh trigger emerges. Spotting that shift in tone will remain our task going ahead.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The United States 4-week bill auction rate decreased slightly from 4.225% to 4.22%. This event is part of a broader market context involving risks, uncertainties, and potential for substantial financial loss.

The forex market saw mixed movements with AUD/USD dipping under 0.6400. On the other hand, EUR/USD struggled to maintain upward momentum, easing below highs near 1.1570.

Gold Prices Reach New Heights

Gold prices climbed, reaching new daily peaks above $3,200 per ounce. Commodities benefited from a weaker US dollar and cautious global market mood.

Cryptocurrencies experienced a 4% drop, with the market’s value hovering above $3.4 trillion. Notably, altcoins like XRP, Solana, and Cardano underperformed the market average.

The UK economy showed a resurgence in the first quarter, but data reliability remains a question. It followed stagnation in the previous year’s latter half, stirring scepticism with recent figures.

Several brokers for trading EUR/USD and other markets in 2025 offered competitive features. These include low spreads, fast execution, and various platforms suited to different trading needs.

Trading foreign exchange carries high risk, potentially resulting in significant financial loss. Thorough research and independent advice are advised for those considering such market engagements.

With the slight drop in the 4-week U.S. Treasury bill rate from 4.225% to 4.22%, short-term funding has become marginally cheaper, albeit barely. This subtle move reflects changing expectations in money markets, even if real yields remain elevated on a historical basis. It’s telling us that current liquidity requirements are still tight, but not getting worse—for now.

We’re seeing mixed currency flows. The fall in AUD/USD below the 0.6400 handle suggests that commodity-linked currencies continue to feel the weight of weaker macro sentiment. That said, the dip is relatively muted, which implies traders aren’t ready to pile in on the downside just yet. Meanwhile, the euro’s inability to hold near the recent 1.1570 zone against the dollar can’t be ignored. That retreat shows us how fragile bullish attempts in major pairs remain despite some divergence between U.S. and European data.

Metals saw a clear benefit from this hesitancy in the dollar, with gold rallying beyond $3,200 per ounce. This breakout reflects renewed demand for perceived stability in portfolios and possibly quiet accumulation in response to geopolitical noise or fragmented rate expectations. An environment marked by a steadily retreating greenback, combined with low-risk appetite, seems to be lending support here.

On the digital asset front, there was a broad pullback of around 4%, but it’s the underperformance of names like Solana, Cardano, and XRP that stands out. Their lag behind the wider space might be speaking to rotation or perhaps less confidence in use-case tokens for the moment. What’s also important here is the total crypto market cap staying perched above $3.4 trillion—that shows resilience, even if short-term momentum is a worry.

Concerns Over UK Economic Data

Domestically, while GDP in the U.K. ticked higher in the first three months of the year, mounting concerns over the credibility of that data are still circulating. After the flat spell seen at the back end of last year, some are rightly cautious about placing too much weight on initial readings. Revisions have been abrupt in recent quarters, so there’s a need to cross-check sentiment signals elsewhere.

As for euro-dollar trading going forward, brokers are ramping up competition again for flows in 2025. We’ve seen the push for tight spreads and prompt execution reassert itself. Traders—ourselves included—should be mindful of what’s behind the “best-in-class” claims. Often it’s the tech stack or order routing that separates solid offerings from pure marketing.

The mentions of financial loss are far from decorative. High leverage, market dislocations and event risks can swiftly erase capital. When we’re deploying strategies in uncertain environments, the emphasis must remain on position sizing, scenario planning and execution quality. Longer-term success often depends on the choices made during these quieter stretches, rather than chasing short-term noise.

Careful selection and consistency remain our best shields.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The U.S. housing market shows mixed signals with new-home sales improving. In March, new-home sales rose to a seasonally-adjusted annual rate of 724,000 units, a 7.4% increase from February and 6% above last year’s figures. Builders are offering incentives, seen in the 7.5% drop in the median price of new homes to $403,600, while inventory increased to 503,000 units, indicating an 8.3-month supply.

Conversely, the existing-home market remains sluggish. March saw a 5.9% drop in resale transactions, reaching an annual pace of 4.02 million, which is 2.4% lower than last year. High borrowing costs and limited listings contribute to this decline, though tight supply is keeping prices firm. Consequently, the median existing-home price rose to $403,700, 2.7% higher year-on-year and a new record for March.

Financial Conditions Consistency

Financial conditions show some consistency but remain historically high. The latest Freddie Mac survey reports a 30-year fixed mortgage rate of 6.81% for the week ending 15 May, a slight rise from 6.76% the week before. Mortgage rates have stayed between 6.7% and 6.9% for nearly four months, 30 basis points lower than a year ago. This range has restricted refinancing but has increased purchase-application volume by about 18% compared to last year’s low levels.

What we’re seeing here is a tale of two markets within U.S. real estate — one trying to regain its footing through builder-led incentives, the other dragging its heels under the weight of tightening financial restraints. On the one hand, the fresh-home segment is showing clear intent. A sharp rise in sales volumes for March, outpacing both the prior month and the same time last year, offers a measure of momentum. That this is paired with a substantial drop in the typical price of these homes tells us that builders are very aware of buyer hesitation and are adjusting aggressively to address it.

It’s also essential to notice that supply has ticked upwards. An 8.3-month pipeline tells us homes are being completed and listed, not just planned. If that figure had dropped, it might suggest demand heating up more quickly than construction can match. As it stands, sellers are trying to entice cautious buyers, not chase them off.

Contrast that with existing homes, which are not moving nearly as briskly. These owners are holding firm, unwilling or unable to list in an environment where they’d need to trade low mortgage rates for higher ones. The result is tight supply paired with surprising firmness in prices. That’s reflected in a new record high for March, despite fewer total transactions. It’s a classic mismatch: would-be buyers exist, but inventory is trapped.

Impact On Credit Markets

That kind of push-pull dynamic naturally filters into credit markets. We haven’t escaped elevated borrowing costs, though there’s been some stability of late. For nearly four months, mortgage rates have hovered within a narrow band — stubborn, but not rising. That range appears to be just low enough to spark demand from younger borrowers or those previously priced out, though not enough to spur broader refinancing activity.

Here’s what we should focus on: markets are pricing in resilience, not exuberance. There’s no rush to chase yield disproportionately, but no collapse to short indiscriminately either. Builders seem to be managing through the higher-rate environment better than secondary sellers, simply because they can be more flexible on price and perks.

Fixed-income futures are digesting these data points steadily — there’s a method to this drift. Volatility play remains sensitive to rate deviation more than volume upside. Positioning should continue to reflect this: staying light where momentum is soft and balancing corrections off tightening headlines. Supply measures, once overlooked, bear watching now, as any tightening could swing rates expectations swiftly. An upward move in inventory or further builder concessions could lean into duration touches more than net-risk-on sentiment.

Watching the gap between purchasing volume and refinancing remains instructive. If that spread narrows — whether through rate movement or lending standard shifts — we may see feeds into consumer creditworthiness measures, which could percolate through swap valuations nearly as quickly as any CPI read. Stay responsive, especially in the front end. The shape of the curve still signals caution rather than expansion. Let’s treat that not as noise, but as guidance.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The EUR/CHF cross is trading near 0.9400, maintaining a downward trajectory as it edges toward its daily low on Thursday. Traders face mixed technical signals suggesting potential downside risks with an undercurrent of short-term bullish momentum.

Technicals show the Relative Strength Index (RSI) in the 40s, indicating neutral conditions. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) points to ongoing buy momentum, contrasting the overarching bearish outlook. Stochastic %K and Commodity Channel Index also display a balanced momentum. The Average Directional Index at 14 reflects a weak trend without a clear directional focus.

Moving averages display a bearish trend. The alignment of 100-day and 200-day Simple Moving Averages with the 10 and 30-day Exponential Moving Averages suggests persistent selling pressure. This bearish presence challenges the 20-day SMA’s short-term recovery signal.

Support levels are observed around 0.9360, with further levels at 0.9353 and 0.9348. Resistance is seen near 0.9370, with higher barriers at 0.9375 and 0.9380, potentially restricting upward movement in the short term.

The cross pair hovers close to 0.9400, drifting lower through Thursday and threatening to pierce its early session base. What’s pressing here is the subtle tension between short-range optimism and the heavier hand of medium-term pessimism. Traders will notice indicators that don’t exactly pull in one direction — neither the floor nor ceiling offer clear refuge just yet.

The RSI hovering in the 40s suggests neither euphoria nor panic. We can read this as the market catching its breath — neither oversold nor overheated — and in waiting mode. Meanwhile, the MACD histogram continues to lean toward buy-side momentum, a possible flicker of upside energy within a broader downtrend. But this is more a glimmer than a beacon.

The Stochastic oscillator and the CCI aren’t moving with purpose either. Their middle-of-the-road readings give little in the way of actionable confidence. Momentum remains scattered. When added to the ADX reading near 14, it’s apparent that directional conviction is lacking. This low number tells us trends — for now — are short-lived and mostly noise.

Now, zooming out slightly, the moving averages paint a picture far less flattering. Both the 100-day and 200-day SMAs continue to lean lower and sit well above shorter-term EMAs. This kind of structure — long-term bears towering above short-term averages — usually telegraphs continued downward bias. So while the 20-day SMA tries to stage some kind of rebound effort, it’s like pushing up against a ceiling that doesn’t want to move.

Levels below show more definition. The 0.9360 mark appears to be the first support trench, followed by 0.9353 and 0.9348 a touch lower, each more fragile than the last. Upside levels look flimsy, with 0.9370 close above and followed by 0.9375 then 0.9380. While none of these are fixed lines in the sand, they may act as magnets or tripwires depending on order flows.

Taking cues from the current structure, the weight of evidence leans toward more weakness. The fact that resistance barriers are close and clustered, while supports are layered thin beneath, tells us which direction may be easier to slip into.

Positioning through the coming sessions should be calibrated with this in mind — nudging trades slightly in favour of the prevailing bias unless abruptly contradicted by short-term volume spikes or surprise catalyst events. Trends may lack sharpness for now, but this very absence of direction can widen price flickers, making discipline even more necessary on either side of a position.

The outlook does not suggest an urgent reversal is on the way. Rather, continued fading into modest rallies could remain the more reactive stance. We’ve seen this structure before, where short bursts of strength quickly unwind — especially if they brush too close to resistance without backing from momentum.

The major European indices have ended the session with gains. The German DAX reached a new record high of 23680.03, while Spain’s Ibex reached levels not seen since April 2008. Italy’s FTSE MIB marked its highest level since 2007.

A summary of the closing levels reveals the following: Germany’s DAX increased by 0.65%, the UK’s FTSE 100 rose by 0.57%, and France’s CAC 40 went up by 0.21%. The Euro Stoxx 50 in the Eurozone saw a rise of 0.12%, Spain’s IBEX 35 climbed by 0.65%, and Italy’s FTSE MIB experienced a rise of 0.15%.

Analyzing Recent Market Trends

These latest moves in the main European equity benchmarks reflect both underlying confidence in regional prospects and a retracement of earlier caution. With the DAX striking a fresh high and the FTSE MIB returning to ground not visited since just before the global financial crisis, we’re witnessing a firm reaction to steady macroeconomic conditions and relatively smooth corporate earnings results. Gains across the FTSE 100, CAC 40, and the Euro Stoxx 50, though more measured, reinforce that there isn’t much immediate selling appetite among participants. Of course, many traders are still waiting on further triggers before committing to extended positions.

As always, pricing in of expectations has started early. Based on this sweep upwards, we’re likely seeing positioning that anticipates stability in interest rates, or at least a slower approach to tightening from the ECB and Bank of England. While there’s no universal catalyst pushing prices along, steady flows appear to come from sectors viewed as undervalued only weeks ago, especially financials and cyclicals.

From our vantage, the key to this rally isn’t only what’s being bought but what isn’t being dumped. That tells us that large portfolios, particularly those that have exposure through options or futures, are being recalibrated with confidence rather than urgency. Delta hedging flows might act as a tailwind if spot prices hold, particularly near strike levels where open interest has built up in recent weeks.

We should also be closely watching how implied volatility has begun to recede slightly in the front-month contracts. This could create encouraging pricing conditions for premium sellers, although it limits risk-reward setups for those positioned for large directional moves. For spread traders, now’s the time to closely monitor movements in index relative strength, as these cues can perfectly line up with short-term dislocations that tend to unwind swiftly.

Monitoring Key Market Indicators

Rising momentum in the FTSE 100, especially, may pull in more levered exposure given how defensives here have lagged tech-heavy benchmarks elsewhere. The rotation appears patchy at best, so maintaining high sensitivity to cross-asset correlations — particularly against currencies — is likely to offer edge through the upcoming sessions.

Any acceleration above round numbers — particularly those that coincide with recent gamma interest — could prompt fast chasing and exaggerated moves. That said, week-on-week carry and roll-down yield remain restrained, so patience on longer structures is something we’re sticking with. With futures curves relatively flat across Europe, positioning looks cautiously constructive, pointing to an expectation of modest continuity rather than sudden re-pricing.

Taken with the backdrop of quiet rates action and a relatively silent central bank calendar, short-gamma strategies on the local indices may see less volatility drag over the next fortnight, so protecting decay and staying responsive to cues remains sensible. We still favour tightening stops on profitable structures and limiting night exposure around expiry windows.

Underlying technical behaviour alongside derivatives flow shows us an environment where short bursts of action may define opportunity windows far more than broad optimism or deep retrenchment. That suggests a shift in rhythm, and it changes what we monitor — not just price direction, but where liquidity is flowing.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US Producer Price Index Drop

Gold prices rose in the North American session as US data suggested decreasing factory gate inflation and weakened consumer spending due to tariffs. XAU/USD is currently trading at $3,202, a rise of 0.82%.

Earlier, gold reached a five-week low of $3,120 but found demand that pushed it back above $3,200. April’s US Producer Price Index (PPI) unexpectedly fell by 0.5%, while the core PPI dropped by 0.4%, missing forecasts. Retail Sales edged up 0.1% in April, following an upward revision for March to 1.7%.

Initial Jobless Claims for the week ending May 10 remained unchanged at 229,000, aligning with expectations. Meanwhile, XAU/USD increased after the release of the data, as the US Dollar Index dipped 0.15% to 100.88.

Speculators now anticipate that the Federal Reserve might reduce policy rates by 53 basis points in 2025. The ongoing US-China trade dynamics have influenced gold, with prices dropping from $3,326 to $3,207 but recuperating due to slow economic indicators.

The week ahead includes more Federal Reserve insights and the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment report. Technically, gold may temporarily rebound if it can’t secure a daily close above $3,200. If it falls below this level, the next support appears at the 50-day Simple Moving Average of $3,155.

Federal Reserve And Sentiment Reports

The article breaks down the recent price action in gold, largely reacting to surprising data out of the United States. Inflation at the factory gate level—tracked by the Producer Price Index—took an unexpected dip. In April, the headline PPI fell by half a per cent, which is quite a sharp move down, and the core figure, which strips out more erratic components like food and energy, slid by 0.4%. These drops ran counter to what many forecasted and seemed to indicate that inflationary pressures might be cooling faster than anticipated. When this happens, the thought process typically moves towards less pressure on central banks like the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates high.

Retail spending slowed too. Although there was a tiny increase in April (+0.1%), March was revised stronger than initially thought, climbing to 1.7%. That rounded picture suggests spending hasn’t collapsed, but there might be a lag forming, especially as tariffs start to take effect again in US-China trade relations.

Against that backdrop, applicants for unemployment benefits in the US stayed flat week over week—no alarming surge, but also no improvement. That stability in jobless claims keeps labour strength narratives alive, but it doesn’t offer support to the hawkish side of the rate debate. And as markets digested the weaker-than-expected PPI, gold renewed its upward movement, boosted slightly by a declining US Dollar Index, registering a slip to 100.88. When the dollar falters, it tends to make gold more attractive in relative terms, especially on the international stage.

As of now, there’s an implied expectation—based on market pricing—that the Federal Reserve may be forced to cut rates by around 53 basis points in 2025. That’s what derivatives traders are calculating into forward markets. We see this come through in fed funds futures, where implied yields have backed off. This is worth re-evaluating regularly as it will affect rate-sensitive instruments across multiple asset classes.

Previously, gold dipped as far as $3,120, a five-week low, but has since snapped back above $3,200. This bounce came on the back of the weaker inflation figures and softer retail momentum, which shifted risk-adjusted return expectations for interest-bearing assets. In simple terms, if returns from bonds or savings ease up due to lower rates in the future, non-yielding assets like gold become more competitive again.

Technical positioning now becomes key. The current price suggests that $3,200 is acting as a short-term ceiling. Unless we see a daily settlement above that marker, the gain looks fragile. If it falters again, the next support level emerges around $3,155—right at the 50-day moving average, a line chartists use frequently to understand price trends over time.

The upcoming inclusion of more remarks from the Federal Reserve and the University of Michigan’s take on consumer sentiment could strain or support this gold recovery. Sentiment is particularly tricky; it can shift quickly and isn’t always aligned directly with hard data. Still, it’s watched closely as an early gauge on spending and inflation expectations.

What matters now is whether incoming US data supports a path to lower interest rates. If we begin to see core inflation measures continue to soften, and if consumption data reflect that consumers are getting more cautious in their spending habits, that puts downward pressure on the policy rate outlook. This wouldn’t necessarily mean a straight line upwards for gold, but it certainly shifts the balance.

In the meantime, trade-sensitive dynamics remain a wildcard. Any fresh headlines, particularly linked to tariffs or trade retaliation, can shake sentiment quickly—making short-dated volatility picks a strategy to watch.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The major US stock indices are recovering from earlier declines. The S&P index is now down around five points, marking a decrease of 0.08%, currently at 5888. Earlier, it reached a low of 5865.16, which is a drop of 27.42 points at the session’s lowest point.

The NASDAQ index is currently down by 92 points, translating to a 0.49% decrease, standing at 19053. It hit a low of 18967.78, marking a drop of 179 points at its session low.

Dow Industrial Average Performance

The Dow industrial average has decreased by nine points or 0.02%, currently positioned at 42042.06. During the session’s lowest point, the index fell by 267.02 points.

Despite these declines, the indices have made a recovery from their intraday lows.

What we’re seeing here is a classic case of short-term volatility giving way to a modest bounce-back. These aren’t full recoveries, but the uptick from session lows suggests there’s resilience behind the selling pressure. Markets have clearly responded sharply intraday, particularly the tech-heavy index, which dipped much more than the rest, indicating that higher-beta shares faced the bulk of selling. But the fact that all three major indices have pared those losses suggests that the downside momentum is weakening, at least for now.

From our position, this intraday recovery signals a recalibration rather than a trend reversal. It tells us that underlying demand hasn’t vanished entirely, even if upward momentum is lacking. They’ve found buyers hunting value at lower levels, which has often been the case during afternoons of similar sessions. Volatility picked up early in the day and was countered later on, pointing toward a possible mean reversion dynamic that should be monitored.

For those mapping out short-term strategies, what’s occurred here nudges us to approach immediate direction with precision rather than conviction. The broader positioning, particularly for short-dated contracts, requires strict calibration around support and resistance levels that were tested and respected today. That low on the tech-heavy index, with nearly 180 points shaved off, was sharp but saw a snapback; this could point to stop-driven flows temporarily overwhelming depth, rather than a shift in broader sentiment.

Implications For Option Writers

In our view, that snapback off the lows puts added spotlight on how option writers are aligning in the near term. Traders need to note that when intraday troughs hold, the pressure shifts to those waiting on breakdowns that didn’t quite arrive. That mismatch between expectation and reality can prompt brief squeezes, particularly as gamma exposure adjusts on either side of the strike.

If you’re structuring trades over the next few weeks, today’s action makes one thing clear: implied movement is being realised intraday, but not fully carried through by market close. That often makes holding open risk overnight less attractive unless well-covered. With movement being compressed into the session and correcting before close, it points to opportunity within the day, not around it.

As we’ve often seen during quieter macro stretches, markets will lean heavily on flows and positioning. That soft dip-and-climb routine across all three indices should be interpreted through that filter. Watch for delta exposures leaning into reactive zones—those lows created narrative risk, which then unwound. That’s where we’ve seen the setups fray for directional bets.

We noticed no breakout movements—only pullbacks being nibbled. Pricing that into forward volatility should help shape trades that fade exaggerated intraday emotion rather than chase it. Option strategies that benefit from decay while guarding against constrained jumps look more appealing here.

That said, as these recoveries settle in and flows normalise, there’s scope to reassess where skew might lean next. Expectations around inflation data or central bank language seem to be paused, which makes short-term dislocations shaped more by flows than fundamentals.

Managing risk in this current rhythm requires a tighter grip. Rangebound setups with well-defined opportunity zones remain the more stable approach. We’d avoid overextending on directional bias until the next clear catalyst or a genuine break in current price containment gives something firmer to trade around.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.