New Zealand’s inflation expectations have risen for both the 12-month and two-year forecasts for the second quarter of 2025. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand’s survey indicates two-year inflation expectations increased to 2.29%, up from 2.06% in the previous quarter.

One-year inflation expectations rose to 2.41% from 2.15%. This has impacted the NZD/USD, edging closer to 0.5900 with a rise of 0.35% on the day.

Understanding Inflation

Inflation measures the increase in prices, typically shown as a percentage change. Core inflation, excluding volatile items like food and fuel, is the focus of economists and is the level central banks aim to control, generally around 2%.

The Consumer Price Index (CPI) tracks the price changes of goods and services over time. Core CPI guides central banks and influences interest rate decisions, affecting currency strength. High interest rates usually strengthen a currency in response to higher inflation.

Gold is traditionally a safe investment during periods of inflation but is less attractive when interest rates rise. Lower inflation, conversely, decreases interest rates, making gold a more appealing alternative investment. Various factors, including interest rates, influence the relationship between currency value and inflation levels.

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ) released its latest data showing a marked uptick in inflation expectations over both short and medium-term horizons. Specifically, market participants now anticipate consumer prices to rise more substantially over the next year and two years than previously expected. This upward adjustment in forecasts reflects heightened concerns that inflationary pressures remain more persistent than assumed earlier and are likely to extend beyond immediate conditions.

What we’re seeing in the one-year expectation, now projected at 2.41% from a prior 2.15%, suggests a firmer belief that price pressures are not fading as quickly. The two-year expectation recorded a similar move, nudging up to 2.29% from 2.06%. These figures remain above the midpoint of most central bank targets, including RBNZ’s—providing the Monetary Policy Committee grounds to reconsider the timing or extent of any easing measures thought to be on the horizon.

Market Reaction and Implications

Unsurprisingly, the NZD has responded in kind. Movement in the NZD/USD pair toward 0.5900 appears to reflect repricing in the wake of inflation data that pushes back against rate cut assumptions. With a gain of 0.35% in the session, there is evidence that near-term rate expectations are being adjusted, with markets factoring in a higher-for-longer policy stance.

Conceptually, inflation refers to the general rise in price levels, and central banks, including the RBNZ, scrutinise a more stable measure known as core inflation. By removing volatile elements like food and fuel, core inflation provides a cleaner measure of underlying trends that monetary policymakers use to base their official cash rate decisions on.

The role of the Consumer Price Index (CPI), and specifically its core variant, is to act as a benchmark for how pricing power develops across the economy. A higher CPI, and particularly a stubborn core reading, places pressure on a central bank to wield tighter monetary conditions. Higher interest rates are typically employed to prevent inflation spirals, which in turn can support a country’s currency because of improved returns on capital investments relocating towards that economy.

In the current scenario, persistent inflationary expectation lifts the likelihood that monetary settings in New Zealand remain relatively restrictive. That, in turn, diminishes the appeal of alternatives like gold, which thrives when inflation rises faster than rates. At moments when policy tightening still has room to run, gold tends to lose ground as opportunity cost becomes more distinct.

That said, the linkage between inflation data, interest rate movements, and currency reaction operates with a relatively steady rhythm. Given the RBNZ’s dual objectives of price stability and sustainable employment, any material upward shift in wage expectations or consumer price trajectories could delay policy loosening. Further up the chain, that limits downward mobility for the NZD in the near term and increases implied volatility for related derivatives.

We should be conscious of how these revised inflation forecasts might seep into behavioural shifts across other inflation-linked assets. Interest rate swaps, bond futures, and currency forwards may now exhibit tighter pricing around current policy forecasts, especially if other central banks begin to diverge in response to domestic inflation trajectories. The key is for participants to stay rigorous in positioning, hedging where necessary, and re-evaluating carry trades that rest on a weakening NZD given the directional bias now implied by the data.

Forward curves could begin to reflect this recalibration. Market sentiment will be tested in subsequent economic readings, especially if inflation expectations continue climbing softly but steadily. For those aligned with rate sensitivity in multi-asset strategies, there is wisdom in re-running stress tests under scenarios that now seem more probable.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Understanding the Head and Shoulders Pattern

In this article, we explain the head and shoulders chart pattern, a popular and trusted formation that helps traders spot reliable trend reversal signals. This pattern indicates when an uptrend may end and a downtrend may begin, or vice versa. Knowing how to identify this pattern aids in making smarter trading decisions and managing risk.

What is a Head and Shoulders Chart Pattern?

A head and shoulders chart pattern is a widely used technical analysis formation that signals a potential reversal in a market trend. It features three peaks: the highest middle peak known as the “head,” flanked by two smaller peaks called the “shoulders.” These peaks form a shape resembling a person’s head and shoulders. The pattern usually appears after an uptrend, indicating that buying momentum is fading and a downtrend may follow.

The key element of this pattern is the “neckline,” which connects the lows between the peaks. When the price breaks below this neckline after forming the right shoulder, it confirms the pattern and suggests a shift in market sentiment from bullish to bearish. This makes the head and shoulders pattern a valuable tool for traders to anticipate trend reversals and make informed trading decisions.

Components of the Head and Shoulders Pattern

Understanding the anatomy of the head and shoulders chart pattern is essential for effective trading:

• Left Shoulder: The first peak, followed by a price decline.
• Head: The highest peak in the pattern, representing the climax of the current trend.
• Right Shoulder: A peak similar in height to the left shoulder, indicating a weakening trend.
• Neckline: A trendline connecting the lowest points between the shoulders and the head. This acts as a crucial support level.

Traders watch for the price breaking below the neckline after forming the right shoulder, signaling a possible trend reversal.

Types of Head and Shoulder Patterns

There are two primary types of head and shoulder patterns:

Standard Head and Shoulders (Bearish Reversal)

This is the classic form of the head and shoulders pattern that typically appears after a sustained uptrend. It signals that the upward momentum is weakening as buyers fail to push prices higher beyond the “head” peak. The formation of the right shoulder indicates sellers are gaining strength. When the price breaks below the neckline, it often triggers a bearish reversal, suggesting prices may start to decline.

Inverse Head and Shoulders (Bullish Reversal)

The inverse pattern is essentially the mirror image of the standard version and usually forms after a downtrend. It shows that selling pressure is losing momentum, as buyers step in to push prices higher. The “head” is the lowest point, flanked by two higher “shoulders.” Once the price breaks above the neckline, it confirms a bullish reversal, indicating that prices are likely to rise.

For example, in late 2024, a major currency pair formed an inverse head and shoulders pattern, preceding a sustained rally that traders capitalized on.

How to Identify a Head and Shoulders Pattern

Correct identification requires attention to detail:

• Shoulders are similar in height: The left and right shoulders should be roughly equal in height, showing two similar peaks that indicate weakening momentum.
• The head is the highest peak: The head stands out as the tallest peak between the shoulders, marking the peak of the current trend before reversal.
• Volume decreases on the right shoulder: Volume usually drops during the formation of the right shoulder, signaling less buying or selling pressure.
• The neckline is the breakout point: The neckline connects the lows between peaks; a decisive break below (or above for inverse) confirms the pattern and potential trend reversal.

A false breakout can happen, so combining the pattern with volume analysis and other indicators like RSI or MACD can improve accuracy.

Discover the 18 candlestick patterns every trader should learn. 

Trading Strategies Using Head and Shoulder Patterns

Once identified, the head and shoulders pattern can guide entry and exit points:

• Entry point: Traders typically enter a position when the price breaks the neckline after the right shoulder forms. For a standard head and shoulders pattern, this means entering a short position; for an inverse pattern, a long position.
• Price target: Measure the vertical distance from the head to the neckline. Subtract this distance from the breakout point (standard) or add it (inverse) to estimate the expected price movement.
• Stop-loss placement: Set a stop-loss just above the right shoulder for a standard pattern or just below the right shoulder for an inverse pattern to limit potential losses.
• Volume confirmation: Look for increased trading volume during the breakout below or above the neckline to validate the strength of the move.
• Risk management: Use position sizing and risk-reward ratios to ensure trades align with your overall trading plan.
• Waiting for confirmation: Avoid premature entries; wait for the price to close beyond the neckline to confirm the pattern.

New to trading? Learn how to start trading for beginners.

Common Mistakes to Avoid When Using the Head and Shoulders Pattern

Below are the common mistakes to avoid when trading the head and shoulders pattern to help improve your accuracy and reduce false signals.

• Ignoring volume confirmation: Volume plays a crucial role in validating the head and shoulders pattern. A significant increase in volume during the neckline breakout confirms strong market participation, while low volume may indicate a false signal.
• Premature entry: Entering a trade before the price decisively breaks the neckline can expose traders to false breakouts, leading to potential losses. Waiting for a confirmed close beyond the neckline reduces this risk.
• Neglecting the broader market context: The head and shoulders pattern is more reliable when analyzed in conjunction with overall market trends and other technical indicators. Ignoring the bigger picture can result in misinterpretation of the pattern’s signal.
• Over-reliance on symmetry: While symmetrical shoulders are ideal, perfect equality is rare. Traders should focus more on the pattern’s overall shape and breakout rather than expecting perfectly equal shoulders to validate the pattern.

By avoiding these errors, traders can improve their success when applying the head and shoulders pattern.

Conclusion

The head and shoulders chart pattern is a powerful tool for identifying potential trend reversals and making informed trading decisions. Traders can significantly enhance their market analysis by understanding its structure, recognizing the key signals, and applying effective trading strategies while avoiding common mistakes. With careful practice on a demo account and the right approach, this pattern can become an invaluable part of your trading toolkit.

Start Trading with VT Markets Today!

VT Markets offers traders access to advanced trading tools and real-time data to spot patterns like the head and shoulders pattern effectively. With platforms such as MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, competitive spreads, and fast execution, VT Markets supports traders in executing strategies based on technical analysis confidently. 

Open your account today with VT Markets and take advantage of expert insights and cutting-edge platforms.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is a head and shoulders chart pattern?

It is a technical pattern signaling a trend reversal with three peaks — two shoulders and a head — connected by a neckline.

2. How reliable is the head and shoulders pattern?

It is one of the most reliable reversal patterns, but should be used with volume confirmation and other indicators.

3. Can the head and shoulders pattern appear in all markets?

Yes, it can be observed in stocks, forex, precious metals, ETFs, and indices.

4. What is the difference between standard and inverse head and shoulders?

The standard signals a bearish reversal, while the inverse signals a bullish reversal.

5. How long does it take for a head and shoulders pattern to form?

The formation time varies but typically develops over days to weeks, depending on the market and timeframe.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Mexican President Sheinbaum engaged in talks concerning the need to bolster their economies to withstand future uncertainties. Discussions included reflections on the impact of the Trump tariff trade war on the USMCA free trade agreement.

Efforts to fortify economic resilience were a key focus, aiming to mitigate potential vulnerabilities. Both leaders acknowledged the importance of addressing challenges stemming from past trade disruptions.

Legacy Of Past Trade Disruptions

These recent conversations between Carney and Sheinbaum point to a shared acknowledgement that prior economic volatility—especially those disruptions linked to tariff measures from several years ago—still leaves effects that must be reckoned with. They are not merely revisiting history but are acting on a sense of unfinished business. That earlier round of trade turbulence, largely seen through the lens of tariffs imposed by the previous US administration, left embedded stresses within the framework of the North American trade arrangement.

While there’s no hint of urgency in their tone, it’s clear from the wording that both leaders are steering their economies toward a state that can endure future external conflicts, whatever their form. They are not reacting to immediate pressure but are trying to build scaffolding in case new pressures emerge.

From our perspective, what stands out is not the political theatre, but the practical implications for expected macroeconomic policy shifts. Based on recent signals, we anticipate a greater effort from both sides to fine-tune export vulnerabilities, likely through diversification. That could mean meaningful shifts in trade volume forecasting and potential effects on currencies tied closely to commodity flows.

Traders placing emphasis on volatility proxies may find that signals from these talks hint at a longer-term dampening in uncertainty indexes tied to North American partnership developments. That is, if these leaders follow through with the policy alignments they’ve discussed, there will likely be adjustments in risk spreads—not instantly, but gradually.

Implications On Financial Markets

In that view, it stands to reason that we may need to place closer emphasis on yield curve behaviour in both Canadian and Mexican bonds when structuring hedges. The positioning across emerging market derivative plays, in particular, may need to account for more stable alliance conditions layered with domestic policy buffers.

Even subtle alignment in economic strategies between neighbouring economies can introduce smoothing in correlated assets. And that, in turn, alters hedging ratios if one is holding exposure across multi-currency derivatives.

We should be closely watching the language used in upcoming central bank releases from both nations. While talks between executives are not binding, they often precede official policy nudges. A tighter reading on inflation targeting, shifts in commodity tax treatment, or export payment flows could arise soon. Historically, such moves have consequences for volatility-linked instruments and forwards.

If Sheinbaum’s administration looks toward revised industrial policy—as some draft discussions have indicated—there could be timing mismatches in economic outputs that lead to decoupling dynamics useful for calendar spreads. Especially in industrial metals and energy, Mexican exposure may fluctuate in a narrow yet structured range, making mean-reversion strategies less effective unless recalibrated.

Meanwhile, Canadian positioning tends to reflect soft alignment with US direction but also tracks commodity-export sentiment within Asian markets. If Carney is preparing for a broader trade shield model, charting how the Canadian dollar interacts with Far East data releases may begin to matter more than current models suggest.

For derivative desks, we’d argue this is an appropriate point to stress-test assumptions on pairings that have behaved in sync during high-volatility periods before. Because, with the pressure easing—though not disappearing—the old relationships might begin to decouple.

Our response here should favour lower-momentum setups in the short term, with wider tolerance bands in straddles, and with greater discretion used when deciding expiry near macro announcements. Rather than pulling back, we might consider adjusting sizing downward while increasing coverage across more asset pairs. The environment encourages nuanced execution, not withdrawal.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Japan’s Economy Minister, Ryosei Akazawa, announced that the government will persist in requesting a review of US tariffs. They will also take necessary measures to provide liquidity support to businesses affected by these tariffs.

The minister noted that improvements in employment and income could support a moderate economic recovery, but cautioned about potential economic risks due to US trade policy. Rising prices have weakened consumer and household sentiment, presenting an economic challenge.

Japanese Yen And Economic Factors

Currently, the USD/JPY pair has decreased by 0.36%, trading at 145.13. The Japanese Yen’s value is influenced by the Japanese economy, Bank of Japan policies, US and Japanese bond yield differences, and trader risk sentiment.

The Bank of Japan controls the Yen’s valuation and has previously intervened in currency markets. Its recent shift from an ultra-loose monetary policy, along with rate cuts by other central banks, is reducing the bond yield differential, providing some support to the Yen.

Amid market stress, the Yen is viewed as a safe investment, strengthening its value against riskier currencies. Economic data and the Yen’s safe haven status are essential in shaping currency trends and market expectations.

From what we have observed, the recent remarks from Akazawa underscore the direct impact foreign trade policies are having on business conditions back home. The government intends to lean in on discussions with Washington, aiming for tariff revisions on certain exports. In the meantime, liquidity cushions will be used to ease the strain on affected companies. The underlying message here isn’t just about diplomacy; it’s about buying time and keeping domestic activity from stalling.

Impacts On Trade Policy And Market Sentiment

There is some optimism around employment and household income stabilising, but it’s measured. With trade tensions escalating and imported goods getting pricier, that optimism risks slipping. As external pressure mounts, the risk isn’t just higher costs – it’s an erosion of purchasing power that’s already fragile. We’ve seen how households respond when prices rise too quickly. Confidence wanes. Spending tightens. That loop can be hard to break.

What we’re dealing with in currency terms is a moderate bid for the Yen amid all of this. The dip in USD/JPY reflects more than technical trading behaviour – it signals an adjustment in forward-looking sentiment, especially as interest rate margins narrow.

The Bank of Japan has taken tiny steps away from its former ultra-lenient stance. That, combined with a softer tone from foreign central banks, particularly in the United States, brings the two nations’ bond returns closer together. The wider the difference in yields, the greater the incentive to sell Yen in favour of Dollars. But with that gap narrowing, we’re seeing some shift back.

Investors still look to the Yen when risk surges; it’s long been their shelter in more volatile stretches. These flows into the currency persist, especially when geopolitical or financial pressures escalate, regardless of domestic macro indicators. It holds true even when local data isn’t overwhelmingly strong. That ‘safe haven’ aspect is not just an idea – it materially influences how traders move capital.

From our viewpoint, we must keep close attention on developments in two areas: trade lines with Washington, and signals from the BoJ. The central bank’s tone, however subtle the hint, will shape bond markets as much as the Yen’s direction. Add to that global yield narratives, and we have a mix that calls for precise, not reactive, strategy. The differential story may not generate sharp moves in one session, but it shapes week-to-week positioning.

In the near term, it’s worth observing whether commodities or equities start to wobble under policy pressures. These often feed back into risk appetite. As risk sentiment falters, money tends to shift back to safe spots. This will naturally drag on the Dollar-Yen pair.

We’ve seen similar patterns emerge in the past. When confidence wavers and central bank policies tip in new directions simultaneously, derivative action tends to accelerate before the cash markets react. It’s likely we’re entering one of those stages once more.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

A Reuters poll surveyed 43 economists on expectations for the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) future actions. Forty-two economists expect the RBA to cut the cash rate to 3.85% on May 20. One economist predicts a larger cut of 50 basis points. Three major Australian banks—ANZ, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, and Westpac—forecast a 25 basis point cut, while NAB expects a 50 basis point reduction.

The median forecast indicates the cash rate may decline further to 3.35% by the end of 2025. ANZ has adjusted its expectations following tariff news earlier in April, predicting a cash rate of 3.35%. Changes in global growth and business environment shifts are factors influencing these forecasts. Business softness currently observed supports a potential rate cut by the RBA. Tariff modifications are also regarded as a factor potentially affecting consumer confidence and general economic outlooks.

Expectations of Rate Reduction

What we see here is a consolidation of expectations around a measured move by the Reserve Bank. Out of the 43 economists polled, nearly all anticipate a 25 basis point rate reduction at the next meeting. Only one outlier presumes a sharper move, believing a full half-point cut may be warranted. That, however, remains a minority position, and the prevailing expectation is more moderate.

The projections laid out are not speculative guesses but are based on key data lately coming into play. A string of activity stemming from earlier tariff developments has already led some institutions to revise their trajectory estimates for the cash rate. ANZ, for example, recalibrated its outlook following those tariff adjustments, now envisioning a drop to 3.35% by the close of next year. While that level reflects a gradual easing, it highlights how the bank anticipates persistent softness in the domestic outlook.

Business sentiment has been trailing lately, and if indicators trend further down, the Reserve Bank may feel compelled to act earlier or with more weight. Consumption metrics haven’t rebounded as many had hoped, and the system now appears to be caught in a cautious gear, with attention shifting from inflation control toward supporting output without triggering unintended asset movements.

Market Implications

For derivative position-holders, especially those involved in rate-sensitive instruments, it’s necessary to readjust exposure. Timing matters—it always has—but when central bank actions can be pencilled in with this degree of clarity, delayed responsiveness comes with a price. Rate cut options, already reflecting the consensus, may lose attractiveness as an entry point, while floating expectations priced into swaps and futures are not yet aligned with the full easing path suggested by some.

It’s right now, not later, that pricing inefficiencies arise from divergent assumptions between market movers and institutional forecasts. Without shaking the framework too abruptly, some of the larger banks are building in room for a more extended path to lower rates. Westpac and the others see a step-down approach, aligned more with a series than a single adjustment. Meanwhile, NAB stands firm in viewing conditions as needy enough to justify an early and bolder move.

That divergence in large bank strategies should not be ignored. It sets up relative value opportunities across tenors in the yield curve. Targeted rate exposure in shorter- and medium-dated swaps presents a clear response to the more dovish end of those forecasts. Positioning accordingly—either through directional bias or volatility surface action—could be warranted where implieds still haven’t factored in full downside.

The softness in the business sector remains a stubborn gauge for how far monetary policy needs to lean. And while tariffs seem like an external subplot, they feed directly into consumer psychology and spending, which in turn holds sway over the central bank’s temperature reading. We’d treat that connection with extra attention, especially as it may resurface through household demand data.

Vols haven’t expanded much, which suggests expectations on move magnitude are stable. But the rate path could sway terminal pricing—so a calendar-specific strategy might be better suited in the near term than positioning for sharp, one-off swings.

Nothing here points to a surprise. What’s revealed is the space between official tone and actual economic rhythm. And within that space—wide enough now to navigate—lies most of the tradable edge.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Japan’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) contracted at an annualised rate of -0.7% in the first quarter, falling short of the anticipated -0.2%. This economic downturn arrives amidst expectations for monetary policy adjustments by the Bank of Japan (BoJ) in the future.

The AUD/USD has risen above 0.6400 during the Asian session, as a weaker US Dollar overpowers speculation of an imminent Reserve Bank of Australia rate cut. Meanwhile, USD/JPY has rebounded towards 145.50 despite Japan’s disappointing GDP figures, driven by contrasting central bank policies.

Gold Price Movement

Gold’s price recovery has been impeded near the 200-period Simple Moving Average, following a recent resurgence from a key low. Global tensions have eased slightly due to a temporary truce in US-China trade disputes, impacting bullion demand.

Cryptocurrencies Bitcoin and Solana saw slight declines after FTX announced preparations for a second round of creditor distributions. In the UK, recent economic growth data from the first quarter has sparked debate over its true reflection of underlying economic conditions.

For those interested in trading EUR/USD, several brokers offer competitive spreads and fast platforms. Options are available for traders at different levels, providing tools for navigating the Forex market.

What we’re seeing in this initial release is a fairly bleak result from Japan’s GDP data for the first quarter, with output shrinking more than economists had estimated. The economy slipping at an annualised pace of 0.7%—well below the forecast of -0.2%—points to weaker internal demand and perhaps slower business investment or consumer activity. That drop could complicate any near-term monetary policy adjustments from the Bank of Japan. With inflation still lurking, but growth faltering, there’s less room to tighten financial conditions aggressively.

Kuroda’s successor now faces a more complex set of choices. Monetary authorities might still lean towards normalisation later in the year, but this contraction adds a wrinkle. Traders watching the yen might want to take note: if economic output remains under pressure, any policy shift may arrive later—or be more measured—than previous guidance suggested. The USD/JPY’s movement towards 145.50 underlines that the market is putting greater weight on rate differentials than local economic performance. That divergence should stay in focus, especially as the Fed remains comparatively hawkish.

Australian Dollar And US Dollar Dynamics

On the other side of the world, momentum in the AUD/USD pair has extended past 0.6400. That’s less about strength in commodities or domestic demand and more down to softness in the US Dollar. Surprisingly, talk of a potential Reserve Bank of Australia interest rate cut hasn’t weakened the Aussie much for now. Instead, a shift in US rate expectations—caused by recent inflation data and positioning—has dominated. We should keep an eye on how markets continue to digest incoming Australian CPI and employment figures in the approach to the next policy meeting.

Elsewhere, gold has bumped into resistance just beneath the 200-period Simple Moving Average. The pause in the metal’s rally suggests that investors are reassessing geopolitical risks. A temporary easing in US-China trade tensions has played some part in tempering demand. While bullion remains supported by its role as a hedge, any cooling in safe-haven flows could cap upside. For now, price action shows a market lacking near-term conviction. That probably continues until there’s clarity on either interest rates or global risk sentiment.

Turning briefly to digital assets, both Bitcoin and Solana have dipped on the back of news that FTX plans to distribute another round of funds to creditors. Although not a major move, it added a short-term supply overhang as some of that capital could arguably be liquidated. Often, such developments inject minor turbulence into trading, especially when participants are still recalibrating post-bankruptcy effects. We’ll need to stay alert for further statements from the FTX estate, as follow-through selling would alter short-term momentum.

Meanwhile, in the UK, debate has resurfaced around the real story behind a better-than-expected Q1 GDP print. Initial figures suggest some recovery, but concerns persist as to whether underlying trends are actually improving or simply reflecting seasonal factors and one-off contributions. The reaction in sterling was modest, which suggests traders are not fully buying into the strength of the headline numbers. That could be telling, especially if follow-up releases introduce downward revisions.

In currencies and beyond, this all leaves us with a market shaped by both economic performance and diverging central bank directions. Movements in major pairs and safe haven assets are being driven less by headlines and more by expectations for policy shifts and relative yield. We would point toward watching implied volatility and positioning data over the next few sessions, especially as participants weigh the emerging data versus forward guidance.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Trump administration is preparing to add several Chinese chipmaking companies to an export blacklist known as the “entity list”. This follows a trade deal recently agreed upon by China and the US in Geneva.

The timing is complex, as some officials are concerned that imposing export controls at this juncture could affect ongoing trade talks. There are differing views within the administration on how these actions could impact the negotiations.

Tightening Restrictions

This move signals a tightening of restrictions at a delicate moment, just as both sides had taken cautious steps towards easing broader trade friction. The “entity list”, essentially a trade barrier, restricts US firms from selling certain goods to the blacklisted companies without special permission. Once on the list, those organisations often find themselves cut off from critical components and markets, particularly in the semiconductor industry, where cross-border supply links run deep. The decision to expand the list now suggests a prioritisation of national security concerns over commercial flexibility.

Officials backing the move are likely reacting to perceptions of accelerating domestic tech development within China, viewing it as a medium-term threat to industrial leadership. Others, however, caution that such restrictions could derail confidence built during recent negotiations, especially if interpreted as an escalation. The Geneva agreement had served as a temporary pause in hostilities, and any action seen as undermining it might prompt retaliatory measures or stall emerging cooperation.

From our perspective, there’s an essential detail here. When internal disagreement exists at high levels, policy outcomes become less predictable. Uncertainty expands, and volatility tends to follow. This leaves very little room for stable forecasts, particularly when export controls intersect with high-value sectors like microchips.

Trading Strategies and Risks

For those of us trading derivatives tied to manufacturing indices or tech-linked baskets, the near-term approach must be guided by this asymmetry. With blacklisting decisions possibly preceding official briefings, there’s a risk of sudden repricing. We may need to shorten reaction timeframes, scrutinise pre-market releases, and be wary of headline-driven spikes from media leaks or briefings given to select reporters.

Further to that, observed patterns from August and October’s earlier additions to the list indicate limited bounce-backs once impacted equities take a hit. Models that assumed quick rebounds failed, especially when Asian liquidity dried up ahead of major US policy announcements. This suggests the market is treating blacklisting more as a structural issue than a negotiable policy threat. That view, if it holds, should shape how our implied volatility assumptions are set across sector-weighted options.

In practical terms, for those working near the metals and components side of the chain, it would be shortsighted to consider this action in isolation. Ripple effects are wider than bilateral trade figures. Restrictions placed on semiconductor parts often force inventory reshuffling down to third- and fourth-order suppliers—suppliers who may not be prepared for sudden gaps in order volumes or client-side licensing requirements.

Mnuchin’s earlier interventions offer a clue as to where pressure might fall internally next. If Treasury gains more influence, future trade decisions might balance economic goals more than security politics, but that outcome is far from certain. There’s little sign of consensus, which matters deeply at desks trading around regulatory policy. When logic diverges at the top, market alignment weakens.

As the week ahead includes manufacturing releases out of Guangdong, responses to disruption risk will likely manifest early in those figures. We’d be wise to filter sentiment via freight and customs data rather than assumptions based on state-level statements. We should also keep one eye on implied beta shifts in exporters with high chip dependency outside mainland indices—these are often overlooked but heavily exposed to binary regulatory shocks.

So, in the weeks ahead, speed will matter more than usual. Our strategy should lean on shorter duration hedges, frequent recalibration of correlation models, and amplifying attention to intra-day volume spikes. There’s no grace period in place when political motives run faster than bureaucratic disclosures.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

New Zealand Manufacturing Sector Growth

New Zealand’s Business NZ PMI increased from 53.2 to 53.9 in April. This growth signifies an expanding manufacturing sector.

AUD/USD remains above 0.6400 amid a weakening US Dollar, influenced by fading optimism over US trade deals. Attention remains on US data and comments from the Federal Reserve.

USD/JPY recovered towards 145.50 amid weaker Japan’s Q1 GDP figures and differing policies between the BoJ and the Fed. Despite Japan’s economic data, markets expect the BoJ to raise rates again in 2025.

Gold prices are struggling to build on a recent recovery from a month-low near the 200-period SMA. A temporary US-China trade truce has eased global market pressures, impacting gold.

Impact Of UK Economic Growth

Bitcoin and Solana experienced declines as FTX plans to initiate the next phase of creditor distributions on May 30. These developments continue to impact the cryptocurrency market.

The UK’s economy showed unexpected first-quarter growth, following stagnation in the latter half of the last year. Discrepancies in data accuracy raise concerns over true underlying conditions.

There is a list of top brokers for trading EUR/USD, noted for competitive spreads and fast execution. The list caters to beginners and experienced traders making it suitable for diverse trading dynamics.

The recent uptick in New Zealand’s Business NZ PMI, from 53.2 to 53.9, suggests that the manufacturing sector continues on a path of expansion. A figure above 50 typically indicates improving output, while the acceleration hints that both domestic and export demand may be firming. From our perspective, this points to heightened short-term opportunities in NZD-related instruments, especially where rate expectations and industrial output matter more in systematic models.

On the other side of the Tasman, AUD/USD holding above the 0.6400 level reflects ongoing weakness in the US Dollar. This softness appears driven more by global positioning than local risk. With optimism about US trade talks beginning to fizzle, the Dollar is increasingly reactive to Federal Reserve cues and harder economic data. If upcoming US figures, particularly inflation or jobs data, fail to meet expectations, we could see further upward drift in AUD pairs, though not without volatility. For now, US traders appear cautious, unconvinced that the Fed can justify firm rhetoric without follow-through.

USD/JPY’s bounce back towards 145.50 comes as Japan’s quarterly GDP shrank, undermining domestic confidence but not enough to push the Bank of Japan off its present course. The gap between US and Japanese monetary policy remains large, but markets are making room for the possibility that the BoJ does intend to make slow but steady progress towards rate hikes. With investors pricing in a potential hike in 2025, this stabilises rate-sensitive positioning, though any firm data or hawkish commentary could accelerate yen moves quickly. It’s the contrast in pace, not direction, that’s keeping this pair lively.

Gold’s short-lived recovery from near-monthly lows touches on a broader trend: diminishing demand for traditional safe havens during periods of cooling tensions. The easing of strain between the US and China, albeit tentative, has blunted appetite for gold in the meantime. However, price action hovering near the 200-period simple moving average suggests traders are waiting for a firmer trigger. Should inflation tick back up or another shock emerge, interest might return abruptly. Until then, price action likely stays within a compressed range.

In the world of digital assets, both Bitcoin and Solana saw declines as FTX prepares a fresh round of creditor repayments this month. These kinds of timeline-specific developments often increase market anxieties, especially in a sector that already wrestles with regulatory uncertainty and liquidity fragmentation. High-beta reactions are being seen in smaller altcoins as well, as traders attempt to pre-position for capital withdrawals stemming from these repayments. It’s another layer of complexity over already shaky sentiment.

Meanwhile, the UK posted first-quarter growth that defied forecasts, surprising many after a six-month stall. However, this upside surprise hasn’t dampened concerns that longer-term performance may still be underreported. With data collection constraints cited, whether this growth can sustain without revision is up for debate. From an interest rate standpoint, however, it will affect how markets think about Bank of England policy paths—particularly in reaction to wage and services inflation. Positioning around GBP may shift fast on backfilled data adjustments.

Lastly, recent broker rankings for EUR/USD trading are being updated based on speed of execution and spread consistency. Algorithmic traders and short-timeframe setups may benefit particularly where latency and slippage bear heavily on strategy returns. For those planning multi-day exposure, the choice of provider may impact longer positions less, but nonetheless shapes rollover dynamics and fills during volatile hours.

This array of cross-market drivers—including Asia Pacific activity, metals, digital assets, and foundational economic releases—requires a flexible strategic view. As we move through the final weeks of the quarter, some narratives are wearing thin, while others, such as central bank sequencing and data divergence, are likely to create more directional opportunities.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

New Zealand’s manufacturing sector showed progress in April, with the Performance of Manufacturing Index (PMI) reaching 53.9. This marked an improvement from March’s figure of 53.2 and maintained expansion for the fourth consecutive month. The reading surpasses the average PMI level of 52.5.

All sub-index values were in expansion during this period. The manufacturing recovery is evident, given the improvement from a low of 41.4 last June. However, there are concerns about the sustainability of this recovery due to uncertainties from external factors.

Current Performance Overview

The reading of 53.9 on the Performance of Manufacturing Index signals that manufacturing in New Zealand isn’t just holding its ground—it’s continuing a clear, measurable recovery. A PMI above 50 indicates expansion, so reaching 53.9—not only higher than the March level of 53.2 but also above the long-term average—suggests that the improvements are not isolated. It’s not just a bounce; there’s depth to it. That said, we still need to recognise the comparison point: in June last year, the PMI reached a strikingly low 41.4, a time when sentiment and demand were both notably weak. We’ve been climbing steadily since then.

Every sub-index tracked—employment, new orders, production, deliveries, and inventories—showed gains. These aren’t minor data points. They’re viewed as individual indicators of demand strength and capacity pressure. An uptick across all subsets gives us a broader story that’s harder to discount. It implies demand is not localized in only one or two areas, which can happen during short-lived rebounds.

Still, questions remain over whether this momentum can carry through the winter period. The improvement may be attributed to a backlog of orders being filled and overseas customers firming up delivery schedules after delays seen earlier this year, both areas that can suggest a trailing effect rather than fresh business. If that’s the case, we could see activity level out unless future demand steps up.

From a trading standpoint, market participants will likely shift focus to whether input costs and output prices within this segment begin to influence broader inflation expectations. If producers show evidence of passing costs onto consumers, even modestly, that amplifies pressure on central banks to hold policy tighter, for longer. That’s when rate expectations move.

Future Considerations

Leitch, who helped compile the report, hinted at this tension, pointing to matched improvements across nearly all dimensions of manufacturing. But improvements like this are useful only if they persist. Hopeful markers can quickly turn into misreads if commodity prices or external orders soften unexpectedly over coming weeks.

In this context, we should watch for changes in forward orders or inventory drawdowns. If manufacturers start reporting weaker future pipelines, that might suggest that April’s results are catching the last swing of a temporary upswing. Additionally, domestic demand conditions remain unclear. While export orders have underpinned much of the growth, household consumption patterns—particularly for items that rely on industrial inputs—might lack the strength to carry the recovery forward unaided.

We’ve noticed that bonds have not reacted sharply to this PMI data, which tells us the market is still weighing how consistent this recovery truly is. The data is good. Very good, in fact. But it’s unlikely to shift macro positions unless we see an upward revision in factory data sustained over a second quarter. And that will only happen if production volumes translate into broader employment gains and wage uplift—both of which feed into discretionary spending.

For future sessions, we’ll be watching input price indices from regional surveys for early indications of margin stress. Also, delivery times. These often trigger expressions of either soft or constrained demand. A fall here would imply smoother running of the supply chain, possibly reflecting unwinding demand.

The central message? Strength in manufacturing opens doors for more confident positioning in industrials, transport and production-linked instruments. But that’s only if more forward-looking indicators, especially new domestic orders, pick up in upcoming releases. Without them, April’s reading is more about catching up than breaking out.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Trump administration has announced numerous deals, primarily with the United Arab Emirates (UAE), though many seem to predate January. Details about these agreements and their associated values remain vague.

The deals include an “AI acceleration partnership agreement” with the UAE and a project between OpenAI and Saudi Arabia for large-scale data centres. President Trump claims to have “secured” nearly $200 billion in US-UAE deals, yet specifics are lacking.

Agreements and Partnerships

An agreement between Amazon Web Services and the UAE Cybersecurity Council for a “sovereign cloud launchpad” was noted, though the Trump administration might be unaware of its development. Raytheon, Emirates Global Aluminium, and Tawazun Industrial Park have a gallium minerals deal to supply materials for a drone interceptor project.

Other agreements involved Boeing, GE Aerospace, and ExxonMobil with UAE companies. The UAE plans to invest $4 billion in an aluminium project in Oklahoma, a move linked to previous US business purchases. No clear timelines or explanations are available for the execution of these sizable financial commitments.

Though the administration has made broad declarations about the volume and value of the recent Middle Eastern agreements, closer examination reveals many of these claims are either recycled or poorly defined. Agreements like the one involving artificial intelligence with the UAE, or the large-scale infrastructure projects tied to Saudi Arabia, lack detailed frameworks and deadlines. We also observe that some of the partnerships mentioned, including the collaboration involving OpenAI or Amazon, may have originated well before the current administration began its talks. In short, they appear to be repackaged rather than initiated anew.

The nearly $200 billion sum attached to these deals, highlighted by Trump as a major diplomatic and economic success, does not currently align with any verifiable, itemised commitments. Where announcements exist, they tend to include only headlines without supporting figures, budget allocations, or legislative follow-through. In financial circles, this exposes ambiguity, especially for those relying on predictable asset flows or policy-confirmed timelines.

In one example, the alliance between Raytheon, Emirates Global Aluminium, and industrial players in Abu Dhabi around gallium-based materials for drone defence projects is an area worth watching. Gallium isn’t widely traded, but it carries strategic value given growing global demand for next-generation technologies. This raises questions about future supply chain implications and potential pressure on industrial metals pricing. The use of such materials for unmanned aerial interception adds a military-industrial dimension, but unless the specifics of the sourcing and timing are published, market impact remains speculative.

Potential Market Impact

We’ve noticed the same tendency with the involvement of American aerospace and energy giants—Boeing, GE Aerospace, and ExxonMobil—entering agreements with Emirati entities. There is some cross-border logic here given previous joint investments and refinery ties, but again, formal disclosures are scant. For example, ExxonMobil’s part in any downstream or upstream component isn’t outlined with operational clarity. That makes it difficult for forward-looking traders to position themselves based on expected logistics, cost structures, or energy throughput.

The $4 billion proposal to develop aluminium capacity in Oklahoma is possibly the most tangible aspect mentioned. This may eventually affect the domestic light metals market, particularly if the project runs parallel with rising EV production or domestic infrastructure demands. However, without timelines or permitting information, forecasting demand on this news alone would be premature. Depending on how state or federal approvals unfold, construction inputs could spark revaluations in building materials and industrial machinery futures. Timing will be key, and delayed execution may create lulls instead of moves in contracts related to raw materials.

No agreement so far has produced fulsome regulatory documentation or undergone Congressional scrutiny. That leaves us working from informal references in press releases and interviews. As a result, any derivative exposure built strictly on these announcements runs a measurable risk of being based on perception rather than enforceable deal flow. There is still potential in some areas—particularly in edge technologies and aerospace—but until those are matched with hard numbers and legal texts, hedging should be done with tighter stops or optionality in mind.

In coming sessions, it may be more productive to focus on listed companies’ earnings guidance and investor reports. If these ventures hold weight, they will appear in forward-looking statements or filed SEC disclosures. For now, speculation on standalone announcements, without attached milestones or financial structures, can lead to short-term mispricing. We’re keeping our bias low and positioning light until these stories filter into confirmed capital expenditure plans or reputable industry datapoints.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.