Back

European markets opened slightly lower, with Germany showing modest gains amid cautious overall sentiment

European stock markets opened with slight declines, reflecting a cautious atmosphere. Despite optimistic US-China trade talks, the overall sentiment remains tentative, muted by limited gains in US futures.

Germany’s DAX index showed a small increase of 0.1%, influenced by Merz attaining the chancellorship on a second attempt. However, other European indices experienced minor decreases: Eurostoxx fell by 0.2%, France’s CAC 40 dropped 0.4%, while the UK’s FTSE, Spain’s IBEX, and Italy’s FTSE MIB decreased by 0.2% each.

International Developments And Market Sentiment

This opening summary reveals that while there’s been a modest level of optimism linked to international developments—most notably the progress in US-China commercial discussions—traders remain generally wary. The equity markets across Europe registered either a narrow rise or modest declines. Germany’s small lift came on the back of Merz’s success in securing the chancellery, which, given it was achieved on a second attempt, might indicate a consolidation of political direction without immediate policy shocks. That said, outside this political development, investors did not show an increase in appetite for risk.

France saw the sharpest dip among the major indices, while other regional markets, including Britain’s, edged down by very similar margins. Ftse’s downward movement was mirrored by those in southern Europe, all reflecting shared concerns likely rooted in uncertain growth figures and restrained expectations for upcoming earnings reports. US futures—normally a directional anchor early in the day—offered little guidance, contributing to the subdued tone.

In the coming sessions, it’s not volatility we should immediately prepare for, but rather mispricing opportunities born from low-volume trade and flattened expectations. When we assess options pricing, particularly in short-dated contracts, implied volatility remains compressed across continental indices, suggesting a market waiting for fresh catalysts. While that wait continues, put-call skews are adjusting, and even in the absence of contradiction, they are offering insight: the market may be guarded, but it’s not panicked.

Market Positioning And Risk Assessment

Traders need not overreact to the absence of direction, but patience should be matched with attentiveness. Open interest has been steadily building at key support levels across Eurostoxx 50 options, which tells us positioning is being layered ahead of anticipated macro data or rate guidance. There’s also a touch of complacency in VSTOXX futures, as premiums remain inexpensive, a cue to evaluate nearer-strike hedges.

Merz’s appointment may unlock policy clarity in sectors tied to heavy industry or automotives, which may explain the sector-specific resilience seen in Frankfurt. If price action confirms this shift, then rolling short gamma into higher deltas in related equity baskets becomes more attractive.

We’ve also noticed that index tracking flows have been minimal, meaning passive demand isn’t likely to buoy markets if sentiment worsens. That informs how tight we hold stops on long-delta structures. They will need to be responsive to macro feedback in the days ahead—be it industrial production or central bank language.

Lastly, rather than leaning too heavily on short volatility trades in this directionless drift, it’s worth revisiting calendar spreads or diagonal structures. These can serve well in collecting decay while retaining event exposure, particularly into expected policy remarks coming out of Frankfurt and Brussels next week.

Patience works for now, but this is not the time to get overly comfortable on one side of the book.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

ING’s commodity experts observed a rise in European natural gas prices due to the EU energy plan

European natural gas prices surged, with the Title Transfer Facility (TTF) rising by 5.5%, the largest daily gain since March. This increase is linked to the EU’s strategy to eliminate Russian gas imports by 2027, which includes ending long-term contracts by that time.

The EU also intends to ban new gas contracts and terminate existing spot agreements by 2025. They estimate that these measures will reduce Russian gas supplies to the EU by one-third by year-end, with more information expected next month.

Potential Production Issues

Additionally, there are reports of halted power flows to the Freeport LNG export terminal in the US, indicating possible production issues at this 20bcm plant. This disruption might further influence European gas prices shortly, based on how long it lasts.

This recent surge in European natural gas prices, represented by the TTF’s sharp 5.5% daily rise, reflects both hard policy direction and current disruptions in supply dynamics. The European Union’s decision to sever ties with Russian pipeline gas by 2027 is not a fresh announcement, but the hardening of this stance—specifically ending long-term contracts and disallowing spot transactions by 2025—lends more weight to these price movements. For short-term traders operating in the derivatives market, what matters most here is timing, and how fast these contractual shifts start to affect actual flow volumes.

We’ve seen this sort of policy-driven rally before. However, what distinguishes this one is the layered uncertainty. The disconnect between headline directives and the physical market’s immediate response provides a window where contracts—especially near-term options—can over- or under-price risk. This presents opportunities if monitored with precision.

Upcoming Opportunities

The European Commission’s estimation that a full third of Russian gas deliveries could disappear from the EU grid within months creates a measurable supply gap. Traders need to position for volatility clusters, particularly around upcoming EU announcements expected next month. If the rhetoric hardens even further, or comes with enforcement measures, reactions in daily and weekly prices could once again be swift and irregular.

Separately, the halt in power flows to the Freeport LNG terminal in Texas throws another variable into the mix. This site has been critical for European LNG intake since 2022, following pipeline constraints. If a prolonged outage is confirmed, we would expect to see front-month contracts bid quickly, particularly via calendar spreads and volatility premiums. The Freeport facility, with its 20 bcm annual capacity, channels a non-trivial mount of supply toward Europe—any disruption longer than three to five days becomes price-sensitive for Q3 forwards.

What took markets by surprise here wasn’t merely the facility power issue but how fast it reflected in European contracts. This suggests an elevated sensitivity to any US-based supply changes, considering the overdependence on LNG for balancing regional shortfalls. Traders should therefore pay more attention to real-time U.S. infrastructure updates—even seemingly smaller ones like compressor station maintenance on Gulf Coast routes—since wider market sentiment is skewed toward pricing fear over probability.

From a strategic standpoint, this isn’t the time to be underhedged. The compression between long-dated stability and short-term price spikes suggests there is growing margin in riding shorter cycles through weekly contracts and near-term straddles. With policy tightening faster than supply chains can respond, and with LNG reliability not fully bankable, we’re likely entering a period where sensitivity to both macro and micro signals is heightened. Moving too slow could mean missing three-digit intraday moves; moving too fast, though, might expose traders to outsized option decay if news flow stalls.

Watch for confirmation around Freeport’s operational status. But equally monitor official EU communications around contractual frameworks—particularly enforcement toolkits or penalties on member states still hosting legacy Russian contracts. Each concrete step ties directly into structural rebalancing, which in turn dictates support or rejection levels on November and December contracts.

In the coming days, implied volatility is worth tracking across both the TTF and Henry Hub derivatives. The link between them is tightening—not due to seasonality, but increasing correlation in sentiment. For portfolios with LNG or power exposure, keeping spreads narrow and staying nimble on margin coverage may prove more advantageous than sitting on passive long-dated exposure that’s not yet reacting.

The TTF’s movement isn’t just technical; it’s reflecting deeper anxiety about physical shortages converging with regulatory tightening. When both of these accelerate within short windows, traders are often rewarded for quick rebalancing and penalised for waiting for the full picture. That full picture may not arrive in time to catch the next price spike.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

In March, France’s trade deficit reduced to €6.25 billion, with exports increasing more than imports

France’s trade balance for March was -€6.25 billion, showing a decrease from the previous -€7.87 billion. Exports saw a rise of 5.6% month-on-month.

Imports increased by 2.3% during the same period. The earlier trade deficit was revised from -€7.87 billion to -€7.70 billion.

The shrinking of the French trade deficit to €6.25 billion in March, from a previously revised figure of €7.70 billion, reflects a positive adjustment, largely driven by a stronger performance in exports. A 5.6% month-on-month increase in outbound goods suggests that external demand picked up, possibly supported by seasonal trends or recovering international activity across key sectors. On the other end, imports growing by 2.3% appear more subdued, indicating only a mild increase in domestic demand or intermediate goods inflow.

For us, that points to a change in the trade dynamics in favour of improved net exports, which should be noted, especially when factoring in short-term positioning in correlated assets or macro-sensitive derivatives. When the trade gap narrows not due to slower imports, but because of faster exports, it often has broader implications for GDP estimates and could subtly feed into forward-looking inflation expectations, especially if it filters through to improved industrial output numbers.

These figures offer concrete evidence of tightening external imbalances, and with revisions to past data showing the initial estimates were slightly overdone, short-term models may need updating to reflect the improved trade footing. From here, it becomes worth tracking whether the export pace is holding up across the quarter, or whether it was simply an anomalous boost in March. Volumes, rather than just headline currency figures, are the next point to watch, particularly for sectors contributing most to the improvement.

Looking ahead, the narrower deficit encourages a firmer bias towards assets sensitive to euro area fundamentals. Implied volatility may adjust accordingly, especially if the euro gains strength off the back of better trade metrics. Rates volatility alongside that could also edge lower, assuming broader data from the region echoes similar improvement. Redistributions of capital within euro-linked baskets might follow, so it’s not about chasing this number alone, but observing how it ties into broader regional performance for derivative pricing.

We’ll also want to position thoughtfully ahead of the next release—if the export growth proves sticky, it could press higher-yield positions on currencies or commodities to readjust, especially those currently skewed toward assumptions of weaker European external demand. Watch for rolling correlation changes and beta shifts to new catalysts as weekly data begins to come in. Timing around options expiry windows becomes key ahead of surprise revisions to such trade figures.

In April, China increased its gold reserves for the sixth consecutive month, according to PBOC data

China’s gold reserves increased for the sixth consecutive month, with the People’s Bank of China reporting an addition of approximately 70,000 troy ounces in April. This brought the reserves to 73.77 million ounces, compared to 73.70 million ounces at the end of March, equating to $243.59 billion from $229.59 billion.

Gold Price Dynamics

The price of gold on Comex showed a decrease of 1.55%, with XAU/USD trading near $3,380 at press time. This price movement occurred irrespective of the recent headlines concerning China’s increased reserves.

Central banks are prominent buyers of gold, acquiring 1,136 tonnes worth about $70 billion in 2022, marking the highest yearly purchase on record. Central banks from emerging economies, including China, India, and Turkey, have been rapidly building their gold reserves.

Gold historically correlates inversely with the US Dollar and Treasuries, usually rising when the Dollar depreciates. The metal is often influenced by geopolitical uncertainties, interest rate changes, and the behaviour of the US Dollar, which frequently dictates its price movements. Gold is viewed as a safe-haven asset and protective hedge against inflation and currency depreciation.

Wu’s central bank added roughly 70,000 ounces of gold in April, nudging total reserves up for a sixth straight month. That puts them just under 74 million ounces, a rise of about 0.1% from March. The value of the hoard climbed sharply—$14 billion in just one month—suggesting price revaluation played a big role, not purely the volume of gold added. The $243.59 billion valuation, against $229.59 billion the month prior, hints at how the market value of existing reserves contributed to that jump.

Impact On Market Dynamics

Despite this steady stockpiling, gold prices dipped. Comex futures slid around 1.55%, with spot levels for XAU/USD hovering near $3,380. This drop came not in reaction to any central bank activity, but more likely from stronger short-term flows on rates and dollar positioning. That’s telling in itself.

We’ve seen over the past year that central banks have continued to be heavy lifters in gold demand. With 1,136 tonnes snapped up in 2022 alone—summing near $70 billion at historical prices—it’s clear that monetary authorities, especially from countries like China, India, and Turkey, prefer gold’s insulation against fiat risk and currency volatility. This approach isn’t speculative in the traditional sense. It’s about durability.

Gold’s price doesn’t operate in a vacuum. It usually moves in the opposite direction of the US Dollar and Treasuries—which means that when yields or the Dollar climb, gold tends to weaken. However, the market often sends mixed signals. It’s not uncommon for gold to hold ground or even rally during rate hikes if inflation expectations remain sticky or geopolitical hazards flare up.

The inverse relationship between gold and the Dollar has been softening recently, though. For instance, the metal has managed to stay relatively bid through periods of Dollar strength, suggesting that there’s a deeper shift underfoot. When major buyers keep acquiring gold despite strong Dollar conditions, it suggests that gold’s relevance is growing beyond just a USD hedge. It’s becoming more of a monetary anchor for certain economies.

As we scan this behaviour and its relevance on the options and futures side, short-term price corrections in gold might offer unexpected opportunities. The decline in gold—even as long-cycle holding increases—could generate sharper backwardations near-term, particularly where long-dated contracts are pinned by steady buying while spot faces rotational exits.

Pricing dislocations like this are where we notice gaps opening, especially if they’re not rooted in structural demand changes. If macro data from the US remains volatile and central banks continue accumulating, we may see traders repricing inflation expectations again via gold derivatives. Mild pullbacks without breakdowns offer us chance to test conviction at key resistance levels.

As yields remain sensitive to Federal Reserve commentary, gold vol surfaces should remain elevated with skew favouring upside. The market might underprice these tail hedges if it continues to tie gold solely to rate adjustments while ignoring the undercurrents of strategic reserve builds. Timing longer-dated longs or calendar spreads with this in mind could present an unusually favourable set-up.

In summary, those watching macro shifts should weigh this accumulation trend more heavily against near-term pricing softness.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The European session features low-impact releases, while the FOMC Policy Announcement is anticipated later.

In the European session, there are a few minor releases and the Eurozone Retail Sales report. However, market reaction is unlikely as the data is expected to have no impact on current expectations.

The American session’s main event is the FOMC Policy Announcement. The central bank is anticipated to keep interest rates steady at 4.25-4.50% and adopt a neutral position due to the uncertainty surrounding tariffs and inflation.

Market Repricing Potential

The market anticipates around 80 basis points of easing by year-end. Fed Chair Powell may respond to these expectations, potentially causing a market repricing.

Attention remains on news about tariffs with the expected announcement of a trade deal soon. This announcement could be made before the Middle East trip and might occur on Thursday, Friday, or Monday.

While today’s economic calendar from Europe is relatively uneventful, the retail sales data serves more as a side note than a market-moving force. Forecasts suggest figures broadly in line with previous estimates, making any deviation unlikely to sway pricing or shift opinions on monetary policy. As a result, there’s little need to react to these early morning releases, nor should traders expect euro volatility to emerge during their publication.

Shifting to the US, the main focus is set on the Federal Reserve’s policy decision. Rates are expected to be held between 4.25% and 4.50%, as policymakers appear content with their current stance. Several factors — namely uncertain inflation dynamics and trade negotiations — mean a wait-and-see approach has become the safer choice. This hesitance is not without merit; data continues to provide mixed implications and carries the potential to mislead if taken in isolation.

Heightened Tariff Speculation

Despite the expected pause in rate adjustments, futures markets already price in a meaningful degree of easing by year-end — roughly 80 basis points. We may observe some resistance from central bankers on those estimates. Powell has generally avoided locking himself into guidance, especially when the outlook is contentious or hinged on unresolved political developments, such as tariffs. However, should he hint that the market’s pricing is overly ambitious or misaligned with internal projections, repricing could be swift and volatile, with the front end of the yield curve taking notice first.

There’s also the matter of heightened tariff speculation. A trade deal announcement has now been narrowed to a possible three-day window: Thursday through Monday. Timed ahead of an overseas diplomatic visit, this gives traders a tighter horizon to assess risk. Should confirmation arrive, equity markets may rally, and Treasury yields could pick up on revived global optimism, suppressing demand for safer assets. This is not purely theoretical — we’ve seen in previous rounds how headlines alone have the power to swing momentum intraday, especially in thin holiday volumes.

For that reason, our focus has to remain on two fronts: watching the Fed’s tone and interpretation of inflation risk, and position-aware sensitivity to any credible commentary on trade agreements. The FOMC’s update, although predictable on rates, can still introduce surprise shifts through language, economic projections, or the tone used in the press conference. How the message lands — not just what is said — could determine interest rate expectations headed into the next scheduled meeting.

Overall, we must weigh any hawkish statements or downplaying of rate cut probabilities against potential upside from a resolved trade conflict. Derivative pricing should continue to reflect both themes, but near-term exposure will likely hinge heavily on how Powell addresses the divergence between market expectations and the committee’s stance, especially if he touches on data dependency or reacts to forward-looking pricing. Until then, the bid in options and futures pricing leans cautious, and that makes sense.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

After three days of gains, the AUD/USD pair trades near 0.6480, nearing 0.6450 support level

The AUD/USD pair has retreated from a six-month high near 0.6515. It targets initial support at the channel’s lower boundary, around 0.6450.

During European hours on Wednesday, the pair trades at approximately 0.6480. Technical analysis indicates a bullish trend as it ascends within the channel pattern.

Short Term Momentum

The pair stays above the nine-day EMA, indicating strong short-term momentum. The 14-day RSI is over 50, suggesting continued upward movement.

A retest of 0.6515, the six-month high, is possible. Crossing this may lead to a seven-month high of 0.6687.

The pair approaches support at the lower boundary near 0.6450, followed by the nine-day EMA at 0.6435. A fall below this could test the 50-day EMA at 0.6338, with a potential drop to 0.5914.

The Australian Dollar exhibits weakness against the US Dollar today. A heat map depicts percentage changes of major currencies against each other.

Investment Risks and Strategies

All information is for informational purposes and involves risks and uncertainties. Thorough research is essential before making investment decisions. All risks and losses are the reader’s responsibility. Errors and omissions are excepted.

The AUD/USD pair has pulled back somewhat from its recent climb, which had taken it briefly near 0.6515—the peak level seen since late last year. This movement back down appears to be targeting structural support near 0.6450, the lower bound of a medium-term ascending channel. As we monitor this zone, we should be aware that a bounce here would reflect buyers maintaining control and respecting the trend.

In early European trading, the pair hovered near 0.6480. Technical positioning remains largely favourable for bulls. Prices continue to float above the nine-day exponential moving average, and the Relative Strength Index—currently above 50—remains comfortably in a range that favours the upside. These indicators continue to provide evidence of sustained upward drive, rather than hinting at exhaustion.

However, there is a tightening window forming. Should the pair fail to hold above the 0.6450 region, pressure could build to push towards the nine-day EMA closer to 0.6435. Beneath that lies the much longer-term 50-day EMA which sits at 0.6338. This would represent a deeper correction and would suggest more controlled selling. There remains considerable risk down to last year’s lows near 0.5914 if these levels fail to contain downside momentum. The range between 0.6350 and 0.6450 likely serves as the near-term battleground.

We noticed on today’s currency momentum heat map that the Australian Dollar trails behind the US Dollar, even though technicals paint a somewhat resilient picture. This tells us sentiment may not fully align with momentum indicators, which isn’t unusual during early phases of trend transitions or before fundamental catalysts shift positions. The broader currency space appears to be weighing relative interest rate expectations and commodity demand projections—areas that very often drive medium-term outlooks in this pair.

For those of us active in options or leveraged positions, this disconnect between short-term signals and broader sentiment should be treated carefully. The recent high of 0.6515 acts not only as resistance but as a trigger. Breaching that could open a path to test levels not seen since last May around 0.6687, but unless support levels hold firm, this potential upside may remain on hold.

Our eyes remain on the interplay between near-term support and broader technical targets. While trend followers may still find comfort in the current channel, any decisive break through moving average support would warrant hedging or partial position unwinding. Traders must use finite levels and clearly defined risk, especially as external variables—such as commodity cycles or Fed rate adjustments—add volatility to otherwise orderly chart setups.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

March saw Germany’s industrial orders rise by 3.6%, exceeding the anticipated 1.3% increase

Germany’s industrial orders in March saw a rise of 3.6%, exceeding the anticipated 1.3% growth. This information was provided by Destatis on 7 May 2025.

Capital goods orders increased by 3.7%, intermediate goods by 2.5%, and consumer goods experienced an 8.7% rise from the previous month. Even when excluding large orders, new orders recorded a 3.2% increase compared to February.

Industrial Demand Trends

These figures suggest a clear pick-up in industrial demand across multiple categories. With capital goods showing solid momentum and consumer goods outperforming, the March data provides tangible evidence of increased business activity in the German manufacturing sector. A more modest yet steady climb in intermediate goods further supports this picture, pointing towards a more balanced pipeline of production that may continue through the coming quarter.

The exclusion of large orders from the topline figure—while still reporting a 3.2% growth—adds weight to the idea that the expansion is not being driven solely by isolated big-ticket deals. Instead, the demand appears broader, reinforcing the impression of improving baseline strength in Germany’s industrial flow.

Looking at this through the lens of contract-based price movements, we should consider that increased factory orders often correspond with greater usage of raw materials and energy, implying potential upward pressure on some input prices. This has implications for volatility in certain contracts that track commodities or heavily industrial-linked assets. If current trends hold through Q2, it introduces a firmer argument for pricing in added production-led demand.

Moreover, the sharp rebound in consumer goods by 8.7% is not something to shrug off. When households or downstream firms increase orders on that scale, it typically means there is underlying confidence in future sales or a reaction to filling depleted inventories. For our purposes, such a push could influence timing of rolls or shifts in exposure—particularly for contracts sensitive to retail output or supply-dependent industries.

Impact on Economic Forecasts

One might point out that the order numbers often serve as a forward-looking indicator, and a consistent uptick here historically aligns with stronger GDP prints. If this pattern holds, the scope for activity-based re-pricing increases. That doesn’t mean there’s an immediate directional consensus, but it does point toward elevated sensitivity across benchmarks tied to continental industrial health.

We should monitor closely the pace at which this demand feeds into actual production figures. Any lag here might temper expectations somewhat. But as things stand, fresh orders entering the system at this rate tend to push utilisation up and reduce downtime in the sector—both of which contribute to a more active hedging environment.

Those of us positioning around macro-indicators would do well to consider how earlier lead-times this year could shift the calendar for expected cycle shifts. In years past, similar builds in core European industrial data have preceded both currency reactions and shifts in bond term structure. Sequence matters. So does alignment between orders and output.

What we’re seeing is not just a numerical beat on forecasts—it reflects sustained upstream and downstream enthusiasm through Q1’s end. That’s real information. It doesn’t predict the shape of future surprises, but it does influence today’s assumptions.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The announcement of US-China trade talks caused a brief 0.4/0.5% surge in the dollar

News of formal trade talks between the US and China briefly boosted the dollar by 0.4-0.5%. Previously, the yen and Swiss franc benefited from US asset sell-offs due to reciprocal tariffs.

Upcoming events include Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s testimony on the international financial system. His statements about currency deals and the strong dollar policy are anticipated, with potential implications for the dollar.

Expected Impacts from the FOMC Meeting

The Federal Open Market Committee meeting and Chair Powell’s press conference are expected to have minimal impact. Despite speculation of a rate cut in July, markets have reduced expectations for the Fed’s easing cycle.

The Dollar Index (DXY) has struggled, with price action viewed as weak and potential for downward movement. This suggests the dollar faces challenges related to US policymaking uncertainties.

Markets initially reacted with enthusiasm when formal trade negotiations between the United States and China were announced, nudging the dollar upwards by around half a percent. That movement, though relatively modest, revealed how sensitive dollar positioning remains to geopolitical developments. In earlier trade sessions, we’d seen the yen and the Swiss franc gain ground—largely at the dollar’s expense—driven not by strengthening fundamentals abroad, but rather by risk-off sentiment triggered by tit-for-tat trade measures.

This pattern reminds us how quickly leveraged flows can rebalance when investor confidence in US assets is shaken. The takeaway should be straightforward: environment-driven currency strength, particularly involving safe-haven assets, often signals underlying anxiety rather than optimism.

Now, all eyes are on Treasury Secretary Bessent’s upcoming testimony. He is expected to touch on currency pacts and Washington’s stance on the dollar. Whether he delivers clarity or introduces further uncertainty might determine the week’s trading tone. His predecessors have, at times, sent markets moving simply by reaffirming—or deviating from—the conventional strong-dollar narrative. We’re watching carefully to see whether this pattern holds.

Challenges for the Dollar Index

On the monetary front, the approaching FOMC meeting is unlikely to shift expectations meaningfully. Powell has already downplayed urgency around immediate rate adjustments. While there was once firm chatter of a July cut, those forecasts have faded as recent data continues to show a resilient jobs market and inflation measures that complicate any dovish pivot. In derivative terms, Fed Funds futures show reduced pricing for easing—a clear indicator that policy sentiment isn’t aligned with aggressive trimming.

The broader sentiment tied to the dollar index still leans negative. Momentum has not held, and the DXY appears structurally soft. From recent chart action, we notice an unwillingness to reclaim prior highs. That paints a picture of waning conviction. As positioning unwinds, the dollar looks exposed, particularly if Bessent tips policy more towards accommodation or if the narrative around trade drifts off course once more.

We’re considering that fragility in directional exposure. With positioning lighter, implied volatility has scope to rise in short bursts. This could offer windows of opportunity for traders who act when pricing fails to reflect incoming policy cues. Staying reactive, rather than predictive, might serve better over the next stretch.

Price patterns suggest the dollar may struggle to find clear support. It’s not a collapse, but it’s a laboured path forward. Traders with near-term exposure may lean into that asymmetry; resistance levels across major crosses have held firm, and unless structurally broken, favour the risk of pullbacks.

Eye on the tape. Narrative shifts—from either Bessent or Powell—tend to ripple wider than initially expected. What sounds benign in policy commentary can be magnified by global positioning that’s still skittish. For now, we’re adjusting not for headlines, but for follow-through.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

There are no major expiries today; market sentiment and headlines primarily influence price movements

There are no major FX option expiries of note for 7 May at the 10am New York cut. Trade headlines, especially related to US-China talks, remain the primary influence on market price movements.

The US dollar is experiencing minor fluctuations, with recent gains tapering. Current market focus is on headline risks and overall risk sentiment as the main influences to monitor.

Significant Expiries Expected

Significant expiries are expected in the coming days, which might have an impact based on future price action. It remains to be seen how these will influence market dynamics in upcoming sessions.

Given there are no FX option expiries with enough size to move the needle on 7 May at the 10am New York cut, the immediate atmosphere feels relatively calm, at least from a positioning standpoint. This lack of larger maturities means price movement is currently less constrained by gamma-related flows. Instead, the story continues to be told by shifting sentiment tied directly to developments in global trade.

The dial remains turned toward any updates from negotiations between Washington and Beijing. These headline triggers, even when speculative in nature or lacking firm detail, have shown they can prompt intraday volatility across currencies. Because of this, shorter dated implied vols have held relatively stable, though not bolstered enough just yet to suggest traders are bracing for highly directional movement this week.

The greenback has slipped modestly from its recent high, although not sharply. It’s reacting more than dictating right now — sensitive to swings in equities, yields, and broader perceptions of economic smooth sailing or turbulence. Yet there’s limited incentive for making aggressive bets in either direction until a fresh driver emerges.

Tracking Clusters of Option Expiries

Looking ahead, we are tracking clusters of option expiries beginning to build toward the back half of the week and early next. These carry more open interest — and in ranges near spot — which may begin to offer more gravity on price as settlement times approach. That gravitational pull could either dampen or enhance movement depending on where spot trades relative to strike levels.

From a trading point of view, watching how price behaves on approach to expiry, particularly near heavily traded strikes, will likely prove more informative than monitoring headline flow alone. Even relatively muted expiries can offer visibility into dealer flows, especially in thinner sessions.

When strikes begin to magnetise price, short-dated vol sellers tend to emerge, trying to harvest premium on moves that seem capped. But if spot threatens to break out of those ranges into zones with thinner OI, we may see momentum accelerate. Reaction times will need adjusting accordingly.

With that in mind, the better path over the next few sessions may be reaction over prediction. Stay light. Let the market show its hand, especially around the key expiry zones that are starting to form. And remember: the cleaner the strike profile, the more directional the move once it lets go.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Trading around 99.50, the US Dollar Index recovers from a prior decline before Powell’s comments

The US Dollar Index (DXY) is trading near 99.50, regaining strength after a previous drop of over 0.50%. This movement comes as caution prevails ahead of the Federal Reserve’s interest rate announcement.

The Fed meeting, scheduled for later, is expected to maintain the benchmark rate between 4.25% and 4.50% for the third time this year. The decision reflects attempts to handle decreasing inflation while managing a strong labour market and trade uncertainties.

Us Economy Contraction

In Q1, the US economy contracted by 0.3% annually, driven by increased imports before potential tariff increases. Inflation indicators like the CPI and PCE show waning price pressures, even though employment numbers remain solid.

Upcoming remarks from Fed Chair Jerome Powell are anticipated, especially amidst tariff conflicts and political pressure for rate decreases. Meanwhile, US Treasury and Trade officials are preparing for talks with China in Geneva, amid elevated trade tensions.

The US Dollar displayed varied performance against major currencies, notably being strongest against the Japanese Yen. Percentage changes include: EUR 0.02%, GBP -0.09%, JPY -0.63%, CAD -0.05%, AUD -0.24%, NZD -0.09%, and CHF -0.39%. The heat map illustrates currency dynamics across global markets.

As the Dollar hovers near the 99.50 level on the DXY, it’s beginning to show signs of consolidation following its rebound from an earlier loss. The earlier slide—just north of half a percent—was not unexpected given the cautious climate ahead of the US Federal Reserve’s announcement on interest rates. Now, that atmosphere has turned palpably tense again, with risk-off positioning likely to remain until the market absorbs what the Fed has to say.

Rate Guidance Impact

The upcoming rate guidance holds weight, with the committee widely projected to keep the current range of 4.25% to 4.50% steady. That same range has now held for three meetings in a row, and the consistency speaks to a broader strategy—carefully managing cooling inflation while not tipping an otherwise steady jobs market. The Q1 contraction in the US, down 0.3% on an annualised basis, stemmed mainly from front-loaded imports, as global buyers prepared for possible tariff hikes. That may have given the impression of softness in domestic demand, although core components suggest underlying resilience.

When viewed through the lens of inflation, price measures such as CPI and PCE point to easing pressures. These figures offer more clarity than noise, suggesting the central bank’s policy tightening over the previous year is filtering through the consumer channels more fully. Meanwhile, pressure to cut rates is emanating from political quarters, and the market will listen intently for Powell’s tone—whether he adopts a more neutral stance or gestures toward potential loosening later in the year.

That nuance matters for us on the trading desk. Any rhetorical slight—particularly on how he links inflation trends to rate outlook—could trigger yield shifts, which have been subdued but prone to fast repricing in recent weeks. Market participants near long positions in dollar-based contracts would do well to hedge against a surprise dovish slant, particularly across risk currencies that have already priced in a fair amount of stability.

Parallel to Fed developments, trade diplomacy is re-entering the spotlight. US officials are setting up for negotiations in Geneva with Chinese representatives, reopening a thread not without volatility risk. Any announcement out of those meetings could lift or sink the greenback, depending on whether tariffs are reinforced or softened. Existing long-dollar trades, particularly against currencies sensitive to Chinese trade demand like AUD or NZD, may warrant more active stops to preserve gains.

From a comparative strength standpoint, the Dollar continues to command most against the Yen—unsurprising given Japan’s persistent yield curve control and broader macro divergence. The 0.63% gain over JPY this session reflects both technical positioning and fundamentals. For pairs such as EUR/USD and GBP/USD, minor shifts of less than 0.1% are consistent with rate expectations across the Atlantic remaining in relative equilibrium—at least for now. Still, thin gains or losses suggest markets are bracing for more direction rather than reacting to current data.

The heat map of global FX shows it best—peripheral currencies lost ground modestly, with the exception of some commodity-linked pairs. CAD dipped by 0.05%, while the AUD and NZD each gave up over 0.2%. These figures remind us not only to track the majors but to watch how trade rhetoric and policy differentials affect even the less headline-grabbing crosses.

In these moments—between policy actions and their interpretations—the value lies more in pacing than aggression. Strategies aiming to fade short-term volatility might find more sustainable edge than those swinging for directional trends, particularly before Powell speaks. The next few sessions will likely need tighter calendar watching, more mechanical risk control, and fewer assumptions baked in.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Back To Top
Chatbots