USD/JPY is struggling to maintain upward traction, encountering resistance near 146.50, which is both the March low and the 50-day moving average. The currency pair has broken through a channel, suggesting a lack of sustained upward momentum.

The recent low at 142 is a critical support level. If this fails, the downtrend may continue towards targets of 140/139.50, with a further projection at 136.50.

Structural Changes In Trading Profile

What this means — put plainly — is that momentum to the upside has faded, and we’re seeing the pair stall just underneath what appears to be a stubborn layer of resistance. Price action around the mid-146s has been sticky, with the 50-day moving average reinforcing the mid-March floor now acting as a ceiling. It’s not just a technical barrier either; we’ve had a well-defined ascending channel breached, which weakens the case for continuation trades to the upside. Structurally, that’s changed the trading profile.

For us, the break of the channel suggests that the uptrend is no longer valid in the near term. Momentum is now neutral to negative, and there’s not much left to hold sentiment if we slip below that 142 handle. It’s more than just a number — it coincides with a series of daily lows formed during pricing congestion in early January, meaning there’s a memory there. Weakness beneath it would open up room towards 140 and then potentially into the 139.50s, both levels where we’ve previously observed buying interest fade into reversals. Beyond that, the area around 136.50 becomes relevant, not only from a Fibonacci retracement standpoint but also because it acted as a shelf during last October’s consolidation.

Directionally, this leaves us with few forward bid catalysts, unless fresh policy language or surprises shift the dynamic. For now, the tone feels heavy, and the burden is on buyers to reclaim footing — not least because volatility is already drifting lower, making premium pickup on long gamma positions somewhat limited unless risk is tightly managed.

Positioning And Risk Management

From our side, we’re now favouring lighter positioning through the top end unless reacceleration comes with volume and a clear reclaim of 146.70 or above. Until then, we’re comfortable trading reversions within this tightening structure. If 142 breaks, short gamma exposure should be reassessed. There’s a temptation to try catching downside extensions towards 140 with calendar spreads or flys, but those should be built thoughtfully, especially with implieds still discounting a narrow range.

We’re mindful of upcoming macro data — especially anything that reshapes yield differentials — though in the absence of such drivers, we think these technical levels remain the best guidance for directional bias. Skew near the lower boundary warrants watching, as positioning may start to lean flatter or even turn defensive into any broader risk-off shift.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The S&P 500 has experienced recent gains due to decreasing tensions and positive outlooks on trade deals. This optimism shifted the market from pessimism to a hopeful stance, creating a possibly overstretched positioning.

Today, the Federal Open Market Committee’s policy decision could introduce some short-term market weakness if there is resistance to the current dovish market pricing. However, hopes for favourable trade deals are expected to continue supporting the uptrend, unless a disappointing trade deal occurs, which could alter market expectations negatively.

Technical Analysis on Support and Resistance

On the 1-hour chart, there’s an identified support zone near the 5,590 level, aligned with a trendline. This area might attract buyers aiming for a rally to new highs, provided they manage risk carefully below the trendline. Sellers might look for a price drop that extends the decline towards the 5,456 level.

This note points out recent strength in US equities, driven mostly by reduced geopolitical strife and an optimistic take on potential trade resolutions. The mood has shifted quickly—from overly negative to remarkably upbeat—which has possibly left trader positions overly reliant on one direction. When we see markets tilt this way, there’s often less room for new momentum unless something fresh validates the move. In short, there’s a lot baked into current prices, and the market may have got ahead of itself.

Market Reactions to Policy Decisions

Meanwhile, policy rhetoric is again in focus. The FOMC’s stance carries extra weight at times like these. If policymakers push back, even lightly, against a dovish interpretation of future expectations—particularly around interest rates or inflation tolerance—there’s scope for volatility. Traders who are assuming easier policy for longer should prepare for any friction there. No reaction is ever clean-cut, but a pushback could jar pricing. We’re not trying to guess direction, but it’s worth recognising that positions based on too much optimism may not hold easily.

Technical structure gives us clearer guidelines. There is a defined zone around 5,590 where buyers may be waiting, especially as this level lines up with a clear trendline that has been respected in recent sessions. When you see price cluster at certain zones and bounce, it’s usually not accidental—momentum buyers are often waiting nearby. We would treat this area as a potential reloading point, though with care steered beneath it, in case sentiment shifts mid-session.

Conversely, a sustained drop under that trendline could pave way for sellers to build momentum down to the next recognised floor around 5,456. That’s not just a number on the chart—it reflects the last place where demand absorbed supply convincingly. Those managing directional bets should monitor price action as it approaches this barrier, especially intraday. What matters here isn’t volume spikes alone, it’s how prices behave as they interact with ranges recently defended.

Recent price movement, shaped heavily by external sentiment and assumed policy tailwinds, may be delicate heading into the new week. The balance of risk and reward now favours reaction management rather than bold new entries. If volatility picks up near known support or resistance levels, control position sizing accordingly. In the next few sessions, flexibility will likely matter more than conviction.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The USD/JPY currency pair is projected to consolidate within a range of 142.20 to 144.00. Over a longer period, it is expected to trade between 142.20 and 146.70.

Recently, the USD experienced a sharp decline and closed at 142.41, a drop of 0.90%. It rebounded strongly afterwards, with indications of slowing momentum and oversold conditions suggesting further consolidation.

Short Term Range Anticipation

In the short term, USD/JPY may hold within the 142.20 to 144.00 range. A sustained break below 142.20 could lead to a deeper pullback in value.

There are risks and uncertainties in the market, and the provided data serves informational purposes without specific recommendations for buying or selling assets. It is vital to conduct thorough research before making investment decisions, as investing in open markets carries risks, including potential losses.

The existing passage outlines a scenario in which the USD/JPY pair, having fallen quickly to 142.41 before recovering, enters a phase of consolidation. This means the sharp move lower has shown signs of exhausting itself—for now. The pair is now seen trading within defined limits: near-term between 142.20 and 144.00, and over the longer term extending up towards 146.70. Such consolidation zones can offer a reprieve after rapid price action, becoming regions where both buyers and sellers re-assess.

Following the decline, momentum has begun to fade. Conditions appeared oversold at the lows. Historically, when prices drop this swiftly and then stall, especially around prior technical supports, we often see reluctance by sellers to push further without fresh catalysts.

If the price were to sustain a move below the 142.20 level, however, the support conviction would weaken, prompting broader downward re-evaluation. Until then, short-term positioning will likely remain neutral, leaning towards selling near resistance and buying near support.

Market Volatility and Strategy

The retracement amid oversold signals gives an indication that sellers may be pausing or exiting briefly, rather than committing to fresh downside. This type of setup often lends itself to range-driven strategies that use existing price parameters as reference.

In the current conditions, what this tells us is that broader volatility has stepped back after a reactive thrust, potentially presenting fewer directional surprises in the near-term. But once boundary levels like 142.20 are tested again, we may see renewed directional energy.

We find ourselves in a reactive rather than proactive mode. The chart is not asking for aggressive conviction yet—tools like RSI or MACD may also reflect this deceleration. Until the pair breaks convincingly above 144.00 or falls under 142.20, short gamma exposures may be more prone to premium decay, as movement compresses.

For those active in structured risk, smaller deltas within the current band may offer value. Historical volatility readings are likely to compress further, opening possibilities for strategies that benefit from range-bound trading, provided tail scenarios are hedged.

The earlier fall was strong and may appear directional, but the failure to build momentum lower—and the volume tapering near that base—signals exhaustion, rather than continuation. If momentum indicators align and macro signals remain muted, the pair could drift rather than trend.

Yields and rate expectation differentials have not moved far enough to cause disorder in the cross, meaning the action is more technical than fundamental at this stage. This affects forward premiums as well, flattening the incentive for near-term trend longing.

In these settings, we find utility in waiting for breakouts rather than trading in anticipation. It’s not always about catching the initial move—often, the reward lies in verifying that a breakout is genuine and supported.

While the broader risks are understood, the current hesitation in direction presents a repeating structure. Until there’s confirmation either side of the set brackets, trading within them—and being aware of their edges—may serve better than leaning into directional assumptions.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Eurozone retail sales for March decreased by 0.1%, contrary to the expected steady figure of 0.0%, according to data from Eurostat. The previous month’s figure was revised down from an initial 0.3% gain to 0.2%.

In March, there was a reduction in the volume of retail trade for food, drinks, and tobacco, which shrank by 0.1%. Non-food products also saw a similar decline of 0.1%.

Automotive Fuel Sales Increase

However, the fall was slightly balanced by a rise in sales of automotive fuel, which increased by 0.4%. This data reflects specific changes within different sectors of the retail market.

This economic data points to a rather subdued consumer environment across the euro area during March. The initial projection had been for flat activity in retail trade, and although the actual drop of 0.1% might appear marginal at first glance, the revision to February’s figure makes that change more meaningful. That slight downward tweak to the prior month, from 0.3% to 0.2%, suggests a subtle underlying weakness in the trend over time.

When we consider the breakdown, it’s clear that the figures aren’t random or without cause. The dip in sales of food, beverages, and tobacco is particularly telling. These are staple goods—typically more resilient to short-term shifts in consumer mood. Their decline, though small, may reflect tighter household budgets or perhaps even seasonal distortions not captured in the projections. Two categories moved lower, but only fuel consumption managed to push upward. Though a rise of 0.4% in automotive fuel stands out on the surface, this alone won’t offset negative pressure in other areas, especially with non-food items also in reverse.

Looking back across recent months, this mix of minor fluctuations suggests the consumer is not stepping up at the moment. That spells a very particular dynamic for implied volatility and price movement linked to broad consumption indices. When trade narrows this way, we tend to see the impact flow into rate expectations slightly more gradually. So, in our positioning, we should lean into the short-term sensitivity of rate-linked products and keep a closer watch on pricing around Eurozone CPI releases.

Market Implications and Forward Outlook

This latest print does not provoke immediate concern, but markets react to momentum more than to point changes. With demand now showing a sideways trend, any surprise later this month from hard activity data or survey releases can invite sharper reactions than they might under different circumstances.

Recent commentary from policymakers like Schnabel and Villeroy suggests that internal demand remains a sticking point for economic momentum. Their forward guidance hasn’t changed, but softening retail adds a layer of doubt around upcoming quarterly projections. We interpret this as a mild downgrade to confidence in the recovery thesis that had been forming in March.

Fixed income traders have already begun to reflect a more cautious view—front-end euro rates have firmed slightly, revealing that markets are beginning to pull throttle back on the pace of easing expectations. Given the forward calendar, it’s unlikely that this trend will resolve anytime soon.

From where we stand, there will need to be a careful reassessment of short-duration volatility structures. The tension between headline inflation and core consumption won’t stay compressed forever. Better to adjust ahead than react once it’s priced in. Keep the balance tight, but don’t ignore the weakness in high-frequency consumption data. It isn’t noise.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The New Zealand Dollar (NZD) may rise above 0.6030 against the US Dollar (USD) but could struggle to keep its position beyond this mark, with 0.6060 being unlikely. In the long term, NZD is anticipated to have an upward trend towards 0.6030 and possibly extend to 0.6060.

In the short-term view, NZD recently surpassed predictions, reaching a high of 0.6013. Despite this rapid momentum increase, overbought conditions might hinder sustainability above 0.6030, and reaching 0.6060 seems unlikely, with 0.6000 as new support.

Medium Term Outlook

Over one to three weeks, NZD was expected to move within a range but exceeded expectations by reaching 0.6013. If NZD holds above the support level of 0.5950, its momentum may continue, with potential to reach 0.6030 and possibly 0.6060.

All projections involve risks, and trading decisions should be based on thorough research. The information shared is not a trading recommendation or guarantee and exposes one to various risks, including the potential loss of investment. As such, financial guidance may be sought if needed.

What’s unfolded so far suggests that the New Zealand Dollar, while pressing higher than forecasted, is entering a stretch where follow-through might be uneven. Last week’s climb to 0.6013 was notably sharper than markets had priced in. That kind of momentum, when driven by short-term positioning or squeeze dynamics rather than fresh macro data, doesn’t tend to come without pullbacks. We’re now looking at a trading environment where the previously considered upper threshold of 0.6030 is being tested, but it’s being met with hesitation.

Here’s what we understand: price action exceeding 0.6010 with such pace indicates that buyers are active. However, momentum indicators across multiple intraday timeframes are sending a mixed set of signals. While they confirm past strength, they also point to stretched upside conditions. This kind of setup often draws in sellers aiming to take advantage of reduced directional drive. Therefore, any move toward 0.6030 might struggle for traction without a break in tempo or a shift in risk sentiment.

Potential Resistance and Support Levels

The next area of interest sits just above — 0.6060 — which many view as a distant target for now. It’s not so much a wall as it is a threshold that lacks support from either volume or conviction. Moves past 0.6030 would need a catalyst, perhaps a dovish shift from the Federal Reserve or stronger-than-expected local data, though neither seems imminent. That said, should 0.6030 hold as a new intermediate resistance without quick rejection, it hints at a broader shift in medium-term bias that shouldn’t be ignored.

On the back foot, support has firmed around 0.6000, and further down at 0.5950, which had earlier served as a base during the previous ranging behaviour. A break below either of these levels would alter near-term risk, but until then, we expect traders to treat dips towards 0.6000 with interest.

From a two-to-three-week perspective, there is still room for price expansion if the 0.5950 area remains intact. It has historically acted as a stabiliser during periods of uncertainty. If the currency maintains buoyancy above that level, then incremental moves toward 0.6030 stay within reach, albeit with a declining probability. Beyond that, the jump to levels near 0.6060 would demand clarity either from economic surprises or central bank tone – components that we don’t have in play right now.

Volatility across currency pairs has been narrowing, and while breakouts like this can promise movement, they can also mislead. Overbought signals, often dismissed in strong trends, might carry more weight here if buyers exhaust themselves around a known ceiling. Furthermore, the reaction at those resistance levels should be monitored closely for divergence, particularly if volumes fail to keep up with attempted pushes higher.

The takeaway is this: while upside targets are visible on the horizon, each step upward appears less convincing than the one before. Market participants may treat rallies toward 0.6030 as trials rather than trends. A cautious approach would involve watching how prices behave near the 0.6000–0.6030 region and being prepared to reassess swiftly.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The UK construction sector showed an ease in its downturn as of April, with a PMI of 46.6 compared to the expected 45.8. House building displayed some resilience, while commercial construction continued to decline, experiencing its fastest decrease since May 2020. The sector remains under pressure despite these improvements.

While construction output levels continued to decline, the rate of decrease was the slowest in three months. This was due to reduced contractions in residential building and civil engineering. However, commercial construction’s decline accelerated, influenced by risk aversion and cautious spending decisions. Cost pressures remained strong, with only a slight reduction in input price inflation from the previous month’s 26-month peak.

Business Activity Expectations Rise

Despite challenges, there was a slight improvement in business activity expectations for the year ahead. Output growth projections reached their highest level this year, with optimism around a potential turnaround in residential building workloads. Survey respondents noted rising prices for raw materials and increased supplier payroll costs, despite a drop in input purchasing.

The information above highlights the latest PMI reading for the UK construction sector, which, although still indicating contraction, was slightly better than forecast. A score below 50 reflects a decline, yet the figure of 46.6 suggests the pace of fall has softened. Most of the easing stemmed from a stabilisation in housebuilding and civil engineering work, though other areas, particularly commercial construction, saw sharper weakness—its downturn now the steepest since the first wave of pandemic disruptions nearly four years ago.

This gives a mixed picture. On the one hand, a few less worrying figures and a slowdown in downward momentum could suggest some near-term steadiness. The market appears to be reading this as a hint that conditions, though still difficult, may not worsen in the immediate future. On the other hand, commercial demand seems to be under fresh strain, with firms hesitating on projects and remaining highly cautious amidst broader cost concerns.

Price pressures have not eased in a helpful way. The rate of input cost increases remains elevated, only slightly down from a recent 26-month peak. Firms continue facing higher prices for materials alongside escalating wage bills. Purchasing levels have dropped, and there’s no surprise in that. It’s clear that companies are trimming orders to manage costs and reduce overexposure to price shifts.

Short Term Positioning Considerations

Interestingly, business optimism did tick higher—not dramatically, but enough to notice. Expectations for the year ahead improved, especially in residential building, where hopes are pinned on a lift in demand. These forecasts, although just that, likely reflect tentative planning assumptions more than firm commitments. We interpret this as a sign that some developers may be contemplating reactivation of delayed projects, but only if economic visibility improves.

From a positioning angle, short-term sensitivity to input cost shifts and construction output figures will likely increase. Any fresh data on raw material prices or order books could have sharper-than-usual effects. Stronger-than-expected declines in commercial activity often result in steep recalibration of near-term margin outlooks. That said, resilience in housing could create short-term positioning opportunity where consensus has skewed too far towards pessimism.

We expect shorter-dated maturities to show increased reaction to inflation consequences stemming from wage growth and materials pricing, especially as supplier wage costs nudge higher and throughput remains restrained. Watch for faster propagation of these shifts into adjacent industrial components—it’s seldom confined when supply disciplines across sectors are this bound up.

Sentiment is not recovering in unison across segments. Rather, it’s the divergence between still-falling commercial momentum and tentative residential demand that could serve as an opening for directional assumption. Any updates indicating changes in public-sector contract timelines or reassessment of capital expenditure by large builders may prompt active adjustment.

In our view, paying close attention to forward-looking indicators—such as supplier delivery times or input price expectations—would be more informative than relying solely on output figures, which lag unfolding shifts in sentiment and supply. The direction from here will rest far less on backward-looking data and more on the early signs coming through procurement and expectations surveys. Modelling risk with wide cost margins remains advisable.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Negotiations between the US and China are officially set to begin. This development creates hope for reduced punitive tariffs following the US government’s previous stance adjustments, which have impacted China’s economy.

The potential easing of economic tensions might not significantly benefit the dollar due to prevailing uncertainties. The sustainable status quo remains uncertain because of ongoing economic and ideological rivalries.

Expectations Of Economic Strain

Expectations suggest economic strain from the trade dispute might lessen, though it will not completely disappear. Markets and instruments discussed here should not be seen as recommendations for buying or selling assets. Thorough research is essential before making investment decisions.

Errors or omissions might exist in the provided information, which is for informational purposes only. Investing carries risks, including the total loss of principal, and any losses, costs, or emotional distress are solely your responsibility. The author and the platform have no affiliations or positions with companies mentioned, nor do they offer personalised investment advice.

Given the beginning of formal dialogue between Washington and Beijing, we’re now watching for outcomes that might alter pricing pressure across multiple sectors, especially where tariffs have weighed heavily. As we see it, this advance doesn’t necessarily assure a rapid rollback of duties or sudden economic relief. Rather, it could introduce temporary calm — pricing adjustments may pause while each side tests appetite for compromise.

Despite this, the wider currency effects might remain limited for now, particularly when considering the dollar’s current trading environment. Lingering uncertainty — both fiscal and philosophical — means any benefit to the greenback from trade optimism might be short-lived and unevenly distributed. While there’s room for dollar consolidation in reaction to headline-driven sentiment shifts, real directional momentum may need stronger catalysts beyond bilateral talks, especially with macro divergences persisting.

Focus On Forward Guidance

From here, focus sharpens on how forward guidance develops and what that means for implied volatility in short- to mid-maturity options. Those with exposure linked to import-dependent indices or firms with strong Chinese supply chains should already be stress-testing existing hedges. We’re particularly cautious of sharp moves sparked by vague language during scheduled press conferences or leaked communiques — an area often underestimated in terms of market impact.

Meanwhile, profit-taking may continue to unwind elevated positions built on worst-case assumptions through late last year. That said, any turn towards optimism remains fragile; liquidity-sensitive products could stage wider swings if positions are exited hastily in response to shifting tone. Monitoring open interest in options around sensitive headlines remains useful, especially in industries where clarity is often deferred.

Tariff-sensitive sectors may display knee-jerk reactions to headlines, though trend confirmation will still rely heavily on customs data and production updates — key inputs for shorter-term derivatives strategies. In our view, traders should not discount the possibility of wider spreads and more erratic pricing midsession as fresh economic figures are reported. This stands especially true where speculation outpaces substance.

Remember, timing entries around scheduled milestones in the negotiation calendar could be more useful than chasing momentum post-announcement. Repricing is often fastest in the first few minutes after details emerge, leaving little room for indecision. While automated orders can help, manual vigilance over exposure around such windows is still worthwhile.

Equally important is recognising the potential for misreads: translation issues or nuance loss have, in the past, led to premature re-pricing based on inaccurate interpretations. Missteps here could leave leveraged positions exposed to forced exits. As always, we find value in running downside scenarios under distortionary conditions before hitting confirm.

At times like this, speed matters — but so does context. Not every update warrants position adjustments; some merit watching rather than acting. Knowing the difference can preserve capital and stability when others chase news-driven noise.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Germany’s April construction PMI was recorded at 45.1, an increase from the previous figure of 40.3. This indicates an easing downturn in the country’s construction sector, with all sectors showing improvements.

The decreases in overall activity and new orders were much less rapid. Despite the existing challenges, this is regarded as a positive development.

Slowed Decline in Construction Activity

The reading of 45.1 on Germany’s construction Purchasing Managers’ Index reflects a continuing contraction, though the pace of decline has clearly slowed. Where the previous figure of 40.3 implied sharp retrenchment across activities, the more recent data suggests a partial stabilisation. Notably, calmer declines in both new orders and total activity point towards reduced pressure on firms, with all segments of the building industry seeing at least modest improvement.

From this, one might infer a shift in market sentiment, where expectations of further struggle are giving way to a slightly more measured tone. However, the index remains below the neutral 50 threshold, which means contraction continues—it’s simply not as intense. In the context of macroeconomic positioning, this could feed into delayed reactions in rates, costs, and perhaps even materials demand, particularly in peripheral sectors tied to infrastructure and real estate development.

As traders, we are largely focused on the degree and direction of economic deceleration rather than whether things are technically improving or worsening on a headline basis. It’s the shift in rate of change that matters. When activity slows at a less aggressive pace, input costs, for instance, may not come down as quickly as previously assumed. Interest rate-sensitive instruments may reflect that re-pricing with less momentum than they did in the earlier stages of the slowdown.

Potential Shifts in Risk and Strategy

From a short- to mid-term standpoint, one should begin thinking in terms of diminished volatility, at least in construction-sensitive segments of broader macro data. The easing contraction changes risk exposures in terms of duration and hedging. Traders have likely begun adjusting positions, pricing in soft landings or an above-zero bounce sometime in the next few reports. That’s informed by forward-looking components in PMI data, such as expectations on future output, which tend to precede actual volumes being reflected in quarterly growth figures.

We should closely track whether this transitional pattern holds in the upcoming months. If order softness continues to decelerate, that may warrant short-term modifications in how we approach rate differentials and credit risk in eurozone-linked trades. Bond-derived instruments exposed to Germany’s construction or input goods may demonstrate less defensive behaviour.

The measured improvement seen here gives scope to reduce bearish bets on momentum fading entirely. While the PMI still prints below expansion, the reduced severity becomes an essential input into pricing pressure forecasts, particularly for near-term policy implications. Some risk-on sentiment might trickle back into corners of fixed income, though not uniformly. Traders have already begun reassessing their calendar spreads and volatility-based positions where construction inputs act as a key signal source.

Key is whether this directional change continues or stalls—either output picks up fully, or soft patches become persistent and keep a ceiling on recovery bets. That’s what we’ll watch.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The EUR/USD remained stable, indicating potential dollar weakness as the market anticipates the Federal Reserve’s hints on monetary policy. Despite political uncertainties in Germany, EUR/USD closed higher around 13.50, reflecting market sentiment for a weaker USD.

Upcoming focus is on the FOMC meeting, where expectations lean towards a dovish outcome, potentially leading to a lower USD. Forecasts suggest EUR/USD may rise with a 12-month target of 1.22 and 10-year UST yields falling to 4.20%.

Forex Market Insights

In the foreign exchange market, EUR/USD navigates around 1.1360 amid unclear directional impulses, influenced by US-China trade talks and Fed policy announcements. Meanwhile, GBP/USD experiences volatility around 1.3360, impacted by changing risk sentiment following the upcoming trade discussions.

Gold showed fluctuations, retreating around $3,400 with market caution preceding the Fed’s interest rate decision. The Fed is expected to maintain the interest rate steady, amidst increasing US recession concerns.

Despite an increase in purchasing power, Eurozone Retail Sales faced challenges, with a minor decline of -0.1% in March. This reflects underlying consumer uncertainty affecting spending.

The stability seen in the EUR/USD exchange rate says more than it seems at first glance. Beneath the calm exterior, there’s a growing perception that the dollar, though technically firm for now, could face renewed pressure. The recent weekly close — incrementally higher even with German political jitters in play — encourages closer attention to the broader movement around the 1.1350 zone. Price action tells its own story. The market had ample opportunity to sell off the euro, yet chose otherwise.

As we look ahead, the FOMC meeting looms large. Any dovishness in tone — particularly if balance sheet concerns outweigh inflation anxiety — would add weight to current forecasts pointing to a weaker dollar. Realistically, the target range around 1.22 on a longer horizon still holds, not as an aggressive call, but one grounded in carry and sentiment-decay returning to the dollar. On the fixed income front, US 10-year Treasury yields are projected to edge lower to 4.20%, under most expected outcomes, especially if the Fed solidifies its stance.

Foreign Exchange and Commodity Markets

Direction in FX remains muddled. The EUR/USD now drifts near 1.1360, with no clear catalyst strong enough to shift momentum meaningfully. US-China trade recalibrations bring added uncertainty, especially as diplomatic progress wavers in favour of cautious optimism, but without concrete results. There’s an expectation building around what Fed Chair Powell will reveal — or not reveal.

In contrast, the pound trades with more instability. GBP/USD swings around 1.3360, its movement sharpened by sentiment shifts tethered to trade rhetoric and broader geopolitical concerns. One gets the sense that this pairing is more susceptible to reactive moves, often unrelated to domestic data. Thin liquidity pockets have also made sharp intraday reversals more common, offering tactical opportunities for those watching shorter maturities.

Gold markets aren’t offering direction either. Prices slipped back, edging lower towards $3,400. The pullback coincides with a wait-and-see attitude in broader markets. Traders have been reluctant to take strong positions ahead of the Fed decision, suggesting gold’s weakness is less technical and more sentiment-driven. This hesitation has also been reflected in options flows, with implied volatilities unusually subdued for this stage in the cycle. Our position sizing remains smaller until clarity returns.

Euro area data painted a mixed picture as March retail sales pulled back slightly, down just 0.1%. The decline itself isn’t worrying in isolation. But when viewed alongside prevailing consumer confidence metrics, it points to a tentative household sector. Encouraged by improved wage growth but constrained by future uncertainty, spending is simply muted for now. There’s been no sharp shock — but equally, no clear acceleration.

From our perspective, market participants should double down on relative value analysis and prepare for higher volatility shaped by Fed direction rather than macro releases. Rates differentials will be re-priced very quickly post-announcement, and missteps in implied pricing could widen in the short term. As always, keep a sharp eye on the risk-reward ratio of each directional position, especially in shadow spreads between US and European curves.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Silver prices (XAG/USD) fell on Wednesday to $32.74 per troy ounce, a 1.46% decrease from Tuesday’s $33.23. Year-to-date, silver has increased by 13.31%.

The Gold/Silver ratio reduced slightly to 103.09 from the previous day’s 103.28. Silver is valued for its historical use as a store of value and medium of exchange, often seen as a hedge against inflation.

Factors Influencing Silver Prices

Various factors influence silver prices, including geopolitical instability and interest rates. The asset is priced in US Dollars, with a strong dollar typically suppressing silver prices.

Silver’s industrial demand also impacts its price due to its high electric conductivity, mainly in electronics and solar energy. Changes in demand from the US, China, and India, particularly in the jewellery sector, can cause price fluctuations.

Silver often mirrors gold’s movements, rising when gold prices do. The Gold/Silver ratio can indicate relative valuations between the two metals, with a high ratio suggesting that silver might be undervalued.

We’ve seen a modest drop in silver, settling at $32.74 per troy ounce as of Wednesday, showing a 1.46% dip from the previous session. Nonetheless, if we glance at the broader picture, silver remains up around 13% since the beginning of the year. That’s not something to overlook, especially in a climate where macro drivers are tugging hard on asset prices, particularly in metals.

Gold Silver Ratio and Market Dynamics

The Gold/Silver ratio, now at 103.09, down slightly from 103.28, hints at a small but noticeable shift. This ratio, which shows how many ounces of silver equate to one of gold, is still sitting in upper ranges. When it stretches like this, it traditionally suggests silver might be relatively cheap compared to gold — though it rarely adjusts swiftly without a clear external push. Traders sometimes lean on this ratio to spot reversals or momentum changes, but real-world conditions like industrial demand and policy shifts tend to drive the primary moves.

Let’s not forget that silver isn’t just a safe haven—it’s a workhorse, heavily tied to manufacturing cycles, especially electronics and solar technologies. With its high conductivity and reflective properties, it plays a necessary role in modern tech. Demand is often dictated by industrial output from countries like China and the US, and during expansion phases, this demand can spike. But when sentiment sours or PMI data comes soft, futures markets react swiftly.

Interestingly, we continue to notice that silver tends to track gold, just not always in real-time or proportionally. The trailing nature of silver’s movement can sometimes delay adjustments in pricing, creating a lag that opens short-term windows for more tactical positioning. And while that relationship provides a directional steer, it’s not always linear. Price moves in gold, caused by central bank policy leanings or inflation expectations, nearly always spill over into silver, if with a slight pause.

When the dollar strengthens, as it has in several sessions recently, dollar-denominated commodities like silver tend to find the air a bit thinner. A stronger dollar makes silver more expensive for foreign buyers, which tampers with demand just enough to tilt the price. Interest rate expectations in the US, particularly after recent remarks from Fed officials, spook or support metals almost instinctively. That’s something we have to factor in daily.

Jewellery demand, particularly from India and China, still holds weight. Recent trade data suggests that while the festival demand did drive up short-term buying a few weeks back, a retracement isn’t surprising — cooled off by shifting rate outlooks or inventory builds. These aren’t constants, but rather pulse points worth monitoring in short bursts; ignoring them can mean missing inflection signals when positioning for next-week expiry.

Moving through early June, our attention remains split between central bank rhetoric and PMI data coming from Europe and the US. With headlines still whispering about rate stickiness rather than cuts, traders leaning on leverage or front-running price have to be sharper about timing. Momentum indicators have softened slightly, which might lend itself to short-term compression, but we’ll treat that as tactical rather than trend-changing.

Looking at options flow and open interest, there’s been no aggressive repositioning just yet. Some contracts further up the curve point to a possible rebound, but without a clear catalyst, snapbacks remain difficult to anchor in the near term. Watching for positioning shifts in the gold complex might offer early clues, especially if the current ratio holds near triple digits for much longer.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.