A hopeful mood prevails as European trading opens, following planned discussions between US representatives Bessent and Greer and China on economic matters. China’s Ministry of Commerce has agreed to engage, with Vice Premier He Lifeng set to meet Bessent to discuss trade.

The announcement has spurred a 0.6% rise in S&P 500 futures. China further boosted Asian market risk sentiment through supportive measures, including multiple rate cuts. This news serves as an encouraging sign for a potential de-escalation in US-China relations.

Tariff Concerns

Currently, tariffs stand at 145%, and any reduction could facilitate trade, though they would still impact both economies significantly. Markets remain optimistic, embracing the potential for gradual de-escalation and tariff reductions.

However, uncertainty lingers over whether such discussions might lead to broad tariff reductions or merely slight improvements. The market’s ultimate focus must be on the end goal—whether it moves towards de-escalation or higher tariffs under current or potential future administrations. For now, the potential for positive change is enough to maintain a hopeful outlook.

What we’ve seen at the open of European markets is a quiet but clear lift in sentiment – one that rests squarely on the shoulders of diplomatic signals rather than hard policies. The rally in S&P 500 futures, with a 0.6% bump, is the most immediate and visual response. It reflects traders positioning themselves on the back of optimism, even before anything concrete has changed. Notably, this movement came right on the heels of Beijing’s confirmation that it would meet with Washington’s representatives, a gesture that, in isolation, tends to produce a short-term relief effect.

Market Dynamics

China’s recent activity – namely, rate cuts and other easing tools – has been strategic. These are not scattershot decisions; they point to a coordinated effort to support growth just as external pressure from trade tensions weighs on activity. From our perspective, it’s this combination of domestic stimulus and international engagement that adds meaning to the uptick in risk appetite seen overnight in Asia. It has reduced the near-term volatility expectations in equity indices and translated into better support for cyclical sectors.

Of course, the tariffs still weigh heavily. Currently set at 145%, they’re burdensome enough to block meaningful expansion in bilateral trade flows. The hope – and it remains only that – is for a reduction at the margins rather than wholesale rollback. Anyone watching the bond and options markets will have seen that this isn’t enough to unwind all hedges yet, but it’s sufficient to slow fresh defensive positioning. We’re likely to see a wait-and-see tone dominate in the short term.

Minds in the derivative market should be less focused on what might be said after the talks and more on the changes in pricing for forward-looking instruments. We’ve already noticed downward pressure on implied volatility in US indices, a dampened demand for deep out-of-the-money puts, and some rotation into call spreads further along the curve. This implies traders are not bracing for disruption, but they are also not betting on a straight-line improvement.

More interestingly, if you zoom into cross-asset activity, the Chinese yuan’s relative firmness since the announcement – despite interest rate cuts – highlights a broader confidence in potential capital inflows. It aligns with stronger performance in regional equities and confirms supportive flows. In this sort of environment, directional trades on headline risk carry more weight – not because anyone believes full resolutions are close, but because market positioning was skewed toward hedging deteriorating relations.

In this environment, timing matters. The next few sessions should offer a window where high-beta names may ride bullish momentum, particularly if additional supportive language comes out of the meetings. That means taking care to adjust gamma exposure accordingly. Let’s not underestimate how quickly sentiment can reverse if expectations climb too high, too soon.

We should also note an asymmetry in the response: downside risk from talks breaking down outweighs the upside if they progress modestly. So while call options might seem attractive after recent pullbacks in volatility, spreads offer a more rational play. They cap potential exposure while still taking advantage of upward moves tied to incremental optimism.

If anything, the past 24 hours serve to remind us that soft diplomacy often moves markets, not through new policy but via how it reshapes investor assumptions. By managing exposures thoughtfully and reading past the headlines, there is a meaningful chance to capture opportunity in the coming sessions, though care around expiry dates and macro headlines should not be eased just yet.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Sterling maintains a steady position, with political developments expected to provide supportive dynamics this month. Recently announced is a UK-Indian trade deal, and there is anticipation of a US-UK trade deal potentially concluding this week.

Trade negotiations involve discussions about reducing US tariffs on UK imports, particularly in the car and steel sectors. Attention is also on the 19 May UK-EU summit, the first since Brexit, which may influence sterling movements.

Bank Of England Rate Setting Meeting

The Bank of England’s rate-setting meeting is approaching, with market expectations leaning towards potential rate cuts this year. This context suggests that GBP/USD might revisit the 1.3445 level in upcoming days.

Readers are advised to conduct their own research before making any financial decisions. Any forward-looking statements are speculative and carry inherent risks and uncertainties. Errors, omissions, and risks involved in trading are the reader’s responsibility. The information provided is not intended as investment advice.

With the GBP maintaining its footing, it’s clear that political momentum is playing a part in cushioning near-term price action. The trade agreement with India, while not market-moving on its own, reinforces a broader stance of economic openness, which appears timely given the possible wrap-up of a UK-US trade arrangement. Should this materialise, reduced tensions in the steel and automotive sectors may lift sentiment. These are sectors still sensitive to post-Brexit trade barriers and existing US tariffs.

A key calendar date sits just ahead with the scheduled UK-EU summit on 19 May. While there’s no hard outcome forecasted, this meeting will be the first of its kind since the UK’s formal separation and may provide a platform for discussions about technical alignment or cross-border industry cooperation. Even without headline breakthroughs, renewed diplomatic engagement might ease medium-term uncertainty priced into the pound. For short-dated contracts or weekly options, it’s another potential volatility generator to consider when setting up trades around that window.

Market Observations And Strategies

From a monetary perspective, the Bank of England’s upcoming policy decision adds another dimension. Rates have not budged for some time, but bond markets have started building in expectations that the central bank will start easing before year-end. Bailey’s recent remarks didn’t push back hard against those bets, and if we look at OIS pricing, the implied probability of a cut by Q4 has grown. So, even in the absence of an immediate directional move, the forward curve is starting to drift lower.

From our side, we’ve noted that sterling has respected the 1.3445 level as an anchor point in past sessions when macro catalysts aligned. If sentiment tilts further in the direction of dovish guidance from the Bank or if major trade accords begin to show concrete timelines, then a test of that zone is reasonable to anticipate. Especially if the dollar starts to lose support from yield differentials narrowing.

Liquidity conditions will also matter. With US CPI data scheduled soon, we may see cross-asset volatility widen ranges temporarily, meaning swing trades should favour tight stops and shorter holding periods. Looking further out, risk premiums could shrink slightly if geopolitical risks stay muted and commodities continue stabilising.

We’re watching closely for any divergence between front-end rate expectations and rolling 3-month implied vols, particularly in Gilt markets. A break in correlation here often signals an adjustment phase in FX. If Gilt yields slip without a matching move in sterling, it may disrupt current positioning in GBP pairs and trigger a brief but tradeable decoupling opportunity.

Market participants should consider whether current pricing has already factored in today’s optimism. Keep the bid-ask spreads in mind before entering any relative value positions, especially in exotic pairs that can widen around event dates. The focus isn’t just on directional plays now—but also on how risk is being transferred or hedged, especially in collars and vertical spreads.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) will reduce the relending rate by 25 basis points, bringing it down to 1.50%. This change is set to take effect from 7 May.

The relending facility primarily supports the stock market by providing low-cost funding for specific activities. These activities include share buybacks and increasing shareholding by companies.

Series Of Earlier Rate Cuts And Measures

This move is part of a series of earlier rate cuts and measures. These actions have been implemented to support economic objectives.

The People’s Bank of China’s decision to lower its relending rate to 1.50% adds to a sequence of initiatives intended to bring down borrowing costs and direct targeted liquidity into the equity market. The facility, by design, enables financial institutions to tap into cheaper credit with the aim of channelling that money towards corporate buybacks and investment in their own shares. By doing so, the authorities are smoothing conditions for domestic equity valuations and attempting to stabilize investor sentiment.

In the past, these tools have mostly been discreet and narrow in impact, but this adjustment marks a clearer shift towards more visible monetary support. Relending, though not as expansive as traditional rate policy or reserve requirement changes, operates with precision. It supports market functions without the broader inflationary risks tied to general rate cuts.

What we interpret from this update is a reaffirmation of intention from policymakers to anchor equity prices and prevent unwanted volatility fueled by deteriorating confidence. By incentivizing firms to amplify their participation in the market via buybacks or additional shareholding, liquidity is indirectly injected onto trading floors in a relatively controlled fashion.

Near Term Directional Bias For Traders

For traders, this tweak to the relending rate introduces a near-term directional bias that makes downward price pressure in equities less probable, at least domestically. We see this as encouraging for pricing stability, especially in sectors tied to state-owned enterprises or companies with strong government alignment. Volume clusters may shift slightly as market makers factor in greater policy-driven support.

That said, this 25-point reduction does not operate in a vacuum. Traders should be reviewing their volatility assumptions and stress points, particularly in instruments where correlation to Chinese equity indices is high. While the cost of leverage for real economy actors is now a touch lower, the output on pricing remains uneven unless accompanied by pickup in turnover or follow-through in physical cash movement.

Despite the narrow scope of relending itself, adjustments like these signal more, not less, involvement from central authorities. This dampens risk premium in selected strategies — especially short gamma structures or calendar spreads where exposure to institutional buying behaviour could spike.

Liquidity conditions may remain somewhat fragmented during the initial days after the cut takes effect. We would be reviewing skew behaviour in structured products and longer-dated index options, as pricing will likely adjust to potential buying activity from corporates and credit-eligible entities rather than broader retail flows.

In effect, this is a rate cut aimed not at households or broad consumption, but rather at steering behaviour within capital markets. Accordingly, one should not expect the usual knock-on effects seen with base policy reductions — swap curve flattening could even be misleading in this case. Focus should instead rest on positioning shifts among players most responsive to central directives.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US Officials and Chinese Representatives Meeting

The currency pair halted its three-day losing streak amid a stronger US Dollar as markets await the Fed’s decision. The Fed is expected to keep the benchmark rate at 4.25%–4.50% for a third consecutive meeting in 2025.

US officials are set to meet Chinese representatives, marking a high-level interaction since US tariff increases. China’s Ministry of Commerce confirmed their attendance, reflecting broader global trade dynamics.

While the USD remains firm, the Swiss Franc is supported by safe-haven flows reacting to US policy volatility. Nonetheless, it might face challenges with potential SNB rate cuts, and some analysts foresee a return to negative interest rates.

The SNB’s forex reserves fell for a third month in a row, reaching CHF 702.895 billion in April 2025. Meanwhile, Switzerland’s unemployment rate dropped to a four-month low of 2.8% in April, from 2.9% in previous months.

Shift in Sentiment for USD/CHF

As we’ve seen, USD/CHF lifting above 0.8250 reflects a shift in sentiment, driven primarily by expectations surrounding the Federal Reserve’s upcoming policy stance. With the general view that US interest rates will be held steady in the short term, demand for the greenback has picked up again, halting a recent wavelength of selling pressure. This stabilisation comes after three successive sessions of declines, and suggests traders are leaning into a narrative of relative US resilience, at least in comparison to peers.

The market has effectively priced in a 25 basis-point reduction from the Swiss National Bank in June – a move that stands in contrast to the Fed’s current pause. If that cut materialises, it would widen the interest rate gap between the two currencies. Such divergence is typically conducive to upward momentum in this pair, especially when foreign exchange markets are already gearing themselves for this outcome. We should, however, be noting how quickly consensus can shift in rate futures once data surprises recur.

Diving further into Swiss factors: the recent slip in the SNB’s foreign exchange reserves for a third straight month implies some moderation in intervention. It’s not a trivial figure either – April’s level fell to CHF 702.895 billion, which suggests that authorities may be less active in dampening franc strength via the reserves channel. That might alter how we think about support levels ahead, especially in the event of near-term policy adjustments.

While a lower unemployment reading – now at 2.8% – might typically offer some confidence regarding domestic strength, it hasn’t managed to offset broader bearish expectations for the franc. In fact, the drop from 2.9% represents an improvement, but it probably won’t carry enough forward momentum to counterbalance easier monetary settings. Notably, some corners of the market are weighing the possibility of a return to negative interest territory in Switzerland – a shift that, if it starts to crystalise in commentary or projections, could act as fuel for further upward movement in USD/CHF.

On the global front, high-level interactions between American and Chinese officials are emerging again, which may eventually feed back into broader risk sentiment. Although this doesn’t connect directly to the pair, it does affect the broader dollar tone and investor appetite for safety-linked currencies like the Swiss Franc. For now, we observe that while the franc continues to benefit from some haven flows – possibly reacting to US policy uncertainty – the trajectory is not one-directional, especially when juxtaposed with falling reserve levels and looming rate reductions.

From here, we’re watching for confirmation – not just in the SNB’s decision next month, but in any accompanying language on future guidance. Should the central bank begin laying out a longer path of accommodation, we might see renewed appetite for forward trades targeting higher levels in USD/CHF. The way the dollar holds against peers could reinforce this.

The job for positioning in this environment won’t be simply about reading central bank rate decisions – it’s increasingly about estimating how quickly expectations around them shift. That includes how traders respond to surprise Swiss data or statements that hint at a slowing of further rate cuts. Short-term instruments are particularly sensitive and will likely reflect even modest revisions in policy pathways.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The day in Asia was eventful with escalating tensions between India and Pakistan, initial US-China trade talks, and rate cuts from the People’s Bank of China. FX rates, gold, and equities reacted to these developments.

India and Pakistan, both nuclear powers, engaged in cross-border violence with India targeting sites in Pakistan described as “terrorist infrastructure”. This follows a deadly attack in Pahalgam, where 26 civilians were killed, marking the worst incident in 20 years.

Us China Trade Talks

The US and China will convene for formal trade talks in Geneva, aiming to de-escalate current tensions. These discussions involve US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer meeting China’s Vice Premier He Lifeng.

China announced supportive economic measures, including a 0.5 percentage point cut to the Reserve Requirement Ratio (RRR) and a 10 basis point reduction in the 7-day Reverse Repo rate to 1.4%.

Gold reached above US$3430 before dropping to around US$3360 amidst these news events, stabilising thereafter. The USD gained generally, while the AUD/USD saw fluctuations. US equity index futures rose on the trade talk news, stabilising off their early highs.

This sequence of global developments presents a tightly packed combination of geopolitical risk, policy easing signals, and early diplomatic overtures, each pressing on separate but connected threads of financial market sentiment. The military exchange between Delhi and Islamabad, highly sensitive given the nations’ nuclear status, has injected immediate risk aversion into markets, especially in Asian trading hours. The attack in Pahalgam triggered official action from India that markets may interpret less as a one-off and more as a draft of what’s to come.

From our perspective, individuals and institutions responding to these events through leveraged instruments should consider any further escalation as a variable that compresses volatility expectations only after dislocations occur. Mispriced gamma, particularly in currency options markets, may lead to unexpected convexity exposures unless properly hedged. In volatility markets, implied levels may not entirely match realised movements yet, opening doors but also sharpening risks.

Geneva Meeting Outcomes

Turning attention westward, the meeting scheduled in Geneva appears structured but remains heavily weighted toward restoring a baseline rather than building new terms. Greer and Lifeng represent voices aligned with resolve, but markets read commitment in tone as well as policy releases. Futures traders seemed to react to headlines first, with volumes pressing upward on initial flashes, only to pull back as reality of conditional outcomes took root.

Beijing’s decision to lower the Reserve Requirement Ratio and ease its reverse repo facility falls directly in line with its recent approach of micro-calibrated loosening. The intent, clearly, is to release funding pressure from local financial institutions, make short-term liquidity more accessible, and hold credit lines open without distorting base rates too widely. With the 7-day reverse repo cut to 1.4%, markets now recalibrate expectations for second-half easing paths. We should anticipate more symmetrical pricing movements in CNH vol structures, tilted to the downside near-term.

As for commodities, gold’s sharp two-way move—first above US$3430 before a drop under US$3360—highlights how fragile haven assets become under dual themes: monetary easing and geopolitical stress. Longs may have initiated prematurely, reacting to conflict headlines before fully understanding the easing bias layered in. That retracement could persist in tighter intraday bands, partly as more participants in European timezones digest the picture.

Certain FX pairs illustrate where hedging decisions may have been uncomfortable. USD strength seems squarely informative. Its ascent through the earlier session shows how risk-off flows and rate differential paths together accelerated swap buying demand. In contrast, AUD/USD firmed for a stretch, only to return to a more defensible level. Here, flow-based participants might have found themselves stapled to commodity drivers, while sat on a revised China stimulus narrative.

From our view, we’ll be watching how funding markets adjust, particularly in forward swap points and options collars. With the kind of dislocations these setups breed, small edges vanish unless traders lock in liquidity earlier. Also, index futures—while notably higher—seem to have retraced in step with a moderated tone from press briefings in Geneva. Technicals remain supported, but conviction appears shallow.

We are likely entering a phase where lower-rate liquidity and raised tail risk interaction creates opportunities, though only when positions are sized prudently. Those moving through leverage would be wiser to treat momentum as subject to abrupt fuel stops.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Indian Rupee continues to lose ground against the US Dollar amid increasing geopolitical tensions following India’s strikes under “Operation Sindoor.” These actions were taken after a deadly militant attack in Kashmir, with Pakistan responding by denying involvement and condemning the strikes. Meanwhile, the Reserve Bank of India may intervene to stabilise the market if volatility persists.

The USD/INR pair may face resistance due to India’s low dependence on exports, offering some cushion against US tariffs. Limited capital outflows have supported the INR, although rising US growth concerns have impacted oil prices, a key component of India’s imports. Despite this, India’s inflation rate has recently fallen to its lowest in over five years, while GDP growth has moderated, prompting the RBI to focus on growth concerns.

Us Economic Overview

In the US, the Dollar appreciates as the Federal Reserve is expected to keep interest rates unchanged amidst tariff-related uncertainty. Traders are closely observing upcoming high-level US-China negotiations following recent economic data indicating strength in the services sector. Meanwhile, India is conducting a nationwide mock drill in preparation for potential hostile attacks amid heightened tensions with Pakistan.

The USD/INR pair trades near 84.60, with support seen near 84.10 and resistance around the nine-day Exponential Moving Average at 84.69. A movement beyond these levels could influence the pair’s short-term outlook.

Given what we see now, the Dollar’s strength is being powered largely by the Federal Reserve’s stance — staying firm on rates despite ongoing concerns about tariffs and trade discussions, particularly with China. Powell maintains the central bank’s cautious posture, holding off on rate cuts even with mixed signals from the broader economy. Service sector data showed resilience, reinforcing this “wait and see” approach rather than spurring urgency for any adjustments.

That naturally affects how we approach the Dollar from here — especially as it finds underlying support from these interest rate expectations. No sudden easing means no notable pullback in yield-driven flows. For those of us watching the USD/INR pair, that stability on the US side keeps the pressure tilted slightly upward unless something new pushes the Rupee the other way. At the same time, the Dollar refusing to back down also discourages aggressive bids on INR from overseas investors.

Domestic Monetary Policy And Market Reactions

Turning our attention to the domestic space, RBI’s hesitation to act hastily on rates, particularly after softer inflation data, deserves a look. A five-year low on consumer pricing theoretically gives the central bank more room to loosen policy. Still, current caution suggests that preserving currency stability takes precedence — particularly with military pressures adding new layers of uncertainty. Domestic bond yields reflect this tension. Even though growth has cooled, the central bank stays methodical.

The market’s perception of the Rupee as relatively shielded from external shock — thanks to India’s internal demand focus and modest export reliance — has provided a buffer. But if energy prices start ticking up again, propelled by stronger global demand or refining bottlenecks, that cushion thins out quickly. A jump in oil would stretch the current account, reigniting concerns that had momentarily quieted.

On a technical basis, support around the 84.10 level continues to hold for now, suggesting that buyers remain active just above that line. The resistance at the nine-day EMA around 84.69 has capped recent rallies, but it’s not a firm ceiling. If the pair edges beyond that level — decisively — it opens the door to a move beyond 85 in a fast market. Still, such a break requires either a renewed Dollar surge or a stumble in local confidence.

From where we sit, direction in the coming sessions likely hinges not only on policy or data but on how these heightened military tensions evolve. India’s mock drills may suggest preparation rather than escalation, but the psychological drag on investor sentiment shouldn’t be downplayed. In times like these, shorter-term hedging strategies tend to see more volume. Dated options and forward spreads have already reacted slightly, with premium costs nudging higher compared to last week.

We remain attentive to the combined effects of political severity, central bank restraint, and international negotiation noise. Each of these variables has a way of jolting short-term positioning even without big headlines. The message from the options market is clear — protection is being priced in both ways, with slightly heavier interest on the upside for the Dollar, reflecting caution rather than a directional bet.

That said, short-term trades attempting to front-run any RBI action or price in a policy shift based solely on recent inflation readings may find the risk-reward skewed. The longer hike-volatility holds, the more defensive flows we can expect, particularly if data out of the US continues to impress. Spread widening between US and Indian 10-year yields also plays into this, and we’re watching that carefully.

All told, the USD/INR price zone now stands at a technically and politically reactive point. While a breakout remains possible, momentum will depend not just on external evidence but also on whether domestic events calm down or take a sharper turn.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Dear Client,

Please note that the dividends of the following products will be adjusted accordingly. Index dividends will be executed separately through a balance statement directly to your trading account, and the comment will be in the following format “Div & Product Name & Net Volume”.

Please refer to the table below for more details:

The above data is for reference only, please refer to the MT4/MT5 software for specific data.

If you’d like more information, please don’t hesitate to contact info@vtmarkets.com.

China plans to increase long-term insurance fund investments in equities by an additional 60 billion yuan (US$8.3 billion). This adjustment is part of an expanded pilot programme to enhance participation in capital markets and is intended to improve financial stability and confidence.

Li Yunze, the leader of China’s top financial authority, disclosed the new measure in a press briefing. Additionally, the authorities are working on new strategies to stabilize the country’s struggling property sector.

Insurance Investment Scheme

The expanded insurance investment scheme is integral to current capital market reforms. Alongside anticipated property sector measures, this change is part of a broader policy strategy to bolster economic resilience against persistent growth and market challenges.

This article points to a fresh injection of long-term insurance capital into Chinese equities, totalling 60 billion yuan. It’s effectively a top-down move to prop up broader financial market confidence. Li says this adjustment is not isolated—it rolls into wider policy efforts aimed at making the economic system sturdier, especially at a time when both investors and institutions remain on edge. There’s also talk of interventions into real estate, which has weighed down China’s consumer sentiment and private investment.

From our perspective, what this means is that the authorities have decided to lean more heavily on institutional resources. Insurance funds, being typically conservative and long-view focused, offer a relatively low-volatility source of capital. We should read this pivot as a message—they’re not depending on short bursts of speculative retail activity, but rather encouraging more steady participation. The hope is that it might reduce major price swings in domestic equities and reinforce internal liquidity when outbound flows are still subject to international headwinds.

As traders in the derivatives space, this adds a clear indication of intent from regulators. More insurance money deployed in listed stocks makes a more stable base for the underlying instruments. This, in turn, may lift implied volatilities less than market activity would otherwise justify. So options premia may not expand in the way some would expect during macro-level uncertainty, because there’s this cushion effect built from institutional inflows.

Potential Market Impact

However, we can’t take it as a signal to relax our awareness. There is talk of further action on property markets, which haven’t yet bottomed out. Measures for that domain are pending, but there’s no guarantee of timing or scope. That risk continues to cast a shadow over banks, developers, and a wide range of indirectly linked shares. So while there may be equity support on paper, some sectors—like construction, steel, or consumer durables tied to housing—might still struggle to find genuine upside momentum.

Also, the fact that this is an expanded pilot implies earlier phases have seen enough satisfaction among policymakers to scale up. That means the original investments, smaller though they may have been, didn’t disrupt pricing or create dislocations. At the same time, derivative traders can interpret this as a cue that interventions of this style and size may recur. There’s now precedent for adding long-term capital systematically if activity levels sag or if valuations decouple from policy targets.

We would suggest mapping short-term positions more carefully to relevant index weightings. Insurers tend to favour stable dividend-providing companies—so that’s likely where the incremental buying pressure will land. Tech growth stocks or speculative counters may not benefit to the same degree. This makes selective hedging via sector-spread positioning a more attractive route than blanket puts or index shorts.

We should also remain ready for abrupt shifts in tone. Nothing in this expansion rules out more abrupt liquidity measures elsewhere. Should stimulus spread to other asset classes, say through offshore credit markets or household wealth products, then the shift could distort correlations. That’s likely to demand fast repricing on multi-asset volatility structures.

In the meantime, we treat this update as a directional tailwind for mainland equities, but with highly specific sector preferences. While that tailwind may suppress expected move premiums short-term, it doesn’t remove tail risk on a quarterly horizon. For now, insurance-led resources flowing into domestic equities should encourage restrained short volatility strategies, especially concentrated around low-dispersion ETFs. However, this still requires close attention to statements from Li’s office, as these remain the clearest forward-looking indicators of tactical policy rotation.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Global markets are showing signs of a cautious recovery as investors focus on trade talks between the US and China, along with upcoming central bank decisions. While policy signals from China and hopes for better dialogue offer some optimism, uncertainty around interest rates and global tensions is keeping many traders in wait-and-see mode.

Global equities edge higher ahead of Fed decision and US–China trade talks

Global equity markets continued a cautious rebound on Tuesday, with the S&P 500 posting modest gains as investors turned their attention to two major developments: the upcoming Federal Reserve policy meeting and renewed US–China trade dialogue over the weekend.

The index closed at 5639.73 after bouncing off an intraday low of 5586.4, where it found firm technical support.

Risk appetite remained fragile as investor sentiment was clouded by mixed messages ahead of the US–China meeting in Geneva.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent described the talks as an effort to “work out what to talk about,” while Chinese officials cautioned against mistaking dialogue for compliance.

Still, futures remained in positive territory during the Asian session, supported by a rebound in Hong Kong equities, which helped underpin global risk sentiment.

Adding to the cautiously optimistic tone were new policy signals from Beijing. Authorities suggested potential interest rate cuts and expanded investment allowances for insurers to support the stock market.

However, the absence of direct fiscal stimulus kept investors sceptical, viewing these measures as temporary relief rather than long-term solutions.

Attention now shifts to the Federal Reserve’s upcoming policy decision. While no rate changes are expected, market participants are keenly watching for dovish language, especially following resilient US employment data.

This labour market strength has led traders to scale back expectations for imminent rate cuts.

S&P 500 technical analysis: Consolidating near support

The S&P 500 experienced volatile price action, opening at 5592.55, dipping to 5586.4, and then staging a strong intraday rebound.

However, the rally lost steam near the resistance level of 5670.47, where profit-taking emerged, resulting in a consolidative range between 5620 and 5665.

Short-term moving averages (5, 10, 30 periods) show a recent bullish crossover, but the slope is starting to flatten, indicating waning upward momentum.

The price remains just above the 30-period moving average, suggesting buyers are still defending short-term support.

On the MACD indicator, the bullish crossover remains valid, but shrinking histogram bars hint at fading buying strength.

A sustained move above 5640 indicates a potential attempt to reclaim higher ground, yet failure to break 5670 decisively keeps the index exposed to further downside—particularly if support between 5610 and 5585 fails to hold.

A clean breakout above 5670.47 could reinvigorate bullish momentum toward the 5685–5700 zone.

Conversely, a break below 5585 might trigger renewed selling pressure, pushing the index back toward recent lows.

Outlook: Cautious optimism with key events in focus

Market sentiment remains delicately balanced as traders await clarity from both geopolitical developments and monetary policy directions.

Should the US–China trade discussions in Geneva result in structured dialogue or meaningful outcomes, the S&P 500 could gain momentum and attempt to break above the key resistance level of 5686.55. Such a move would likely bolster risk appetite and encourage broader equity participation.

However, several headwinds continue to cap near-term upside potential. Central banks across major economies remain non-committal, and the lack of a clear rate-cut path from the Federal Reserve adds to investor hesitation.

Meanwhile, lingering geopolitical tensions—not only between the US and China but also in other regions—keep global markets on edge.

In this environment, the S&P 500 is likely to remain in a consolidative range between 5630 and 5660, unless a decisive catalyst emerges.

Key data releases, central bank commentary, or significant breakthroughs in trade relations could provide the necessary push.

Until then, cautious optimism is likely to dominate market positioning, with traders favouring short-term setups over long directional bets.

Click here to open account and start trading.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has pledged its support to Central Huijin in bolstering the financial markets. Central Huijin and the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) are functioning as a quasi-stabilisation fund.

China is set to introduce reform measures aimed at enhancing technology boards. Adequate preparations have been established to manage external economic shocks.

Encouraging Long Term Capital

The CSRC intends to actively encourage the infusion of long-term capital into the stock market. Confidence remains high in achieving stable development in China’s stock market environment.

We’re now seeing clearer intentions from the regulators — not idle reassurances, but tangible steps. The CSRC gave its backing to Central Huijin, the state investment arm, reinforcing its role in calming volatility and pumping liquidity where needed. This, coupled with support from the People’s Bank of China, resembles actions seen during periods of domestic stress in past trading cycles, such as in 2015 and 2008. The objective remains clear: reduce panic-driven selling and anchor pricing expectations more firmly.

With preparations laid to shield the financial system from global economic headwinds, there is little ambiguity about what policymakers fear — foreign capital instability, tech stock fragility, and policy tightening overseas. Strengthening the technology boards signals a desire to direct capital flows toward domestic innovation rather than property and infrastructure — sectors that previously drove cycles but are now less favoured. Momentum here could begin impacting risk premiums on relevant contracts, especially those tied to mainland growth sectors.

By stating it will “encourage” long-term money into equities, the CSRC is gesturing to large institutional players — pension funds, insurers, perhaps even sovereign pools. This means an intended shift from short-term, sentiment-driven speculation toward something more anchored, slower moving, but potentially impactful over time. When this kind of participation increases, volatility typically tapers in major indices, and the composition of flows becomes easier to track.

Market Stability and Policy Responses

Liu, in his recent remarks, underscored confidence in achieving steady progress. Layered into the current policy tone is a reminder: the tools remain on hand, and authorities will not hesitate to deploy coordinated effort if market signals begin to weaken abruptly. This is not only a signal to domestic investors but also a calibration point for those watching from offshore.

Over the next one to two weeks, the direction of large-cap indices may become less reactive to news headlines and more driven by policy impact. Short-dated implied volatilities already hint at a ceiling, though relative strength remains with futures tied to tech-heavy boards. Options positioning suggests that recent hedging may unwind in waves if downside triggers fail to materialise. In this scenario, we anticipate dealer gamma exposure to flip more positively, which typically reinforces stability unless intraday volume spikes.

For us, the real takeaway lies in how predictable policy responses are becoming. One could start aligning tactically around that. The implied message from reform efforts and market interventions is stability first — and that’s not usually incompatible with near-term tactical moves, particularly in instruments most closely tied to domestic flows.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.