US President Donald Trump characterised recent US-China discussions in Switzerland as ‘very good’, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent noting ‘substantial progress’. New levels of duties are being considered alongside exemptions, as economic stakeholders assess these factors.

The dollar’s recovery, supported by Trump’s changes in trade strategy, contrasts with broader equity market gains. Upcoming US inflation data is pivotal, with expectations for April’s core CPI at 0.3% month-on-month. This may inform pressures on the Federal Reserve’s core PCE measure, though not likely to prompt immediate central bank action.

The Dollar And Market Influences

The dollar remains influenced by varied forces, with potential support around 100.0 in DXY likely amid scrutiny of US-China talks. Early week developments may soften the dollar’s trajectory, though initial support is anticipated to emerge as negotiations progress further.

This summary outlines recent trade dialogues between the United States and China, with Trump describing the conversations as productive. Bessent backed this up, suggesting there had been concrete advancements. While they weigh the option of adjusting tariffs—either increasing them or granting exemptions—market participants are examining in real time how these decisions might impact broader financial dynamics.

The US dollar, which had been on the back foot for a while, is now attempting a modest revival. Much of that strength is being attributed to adjustments in Washington’s approach to international commerce. At the same time, American stocks are ticking higher, indicating not everything follows the same rhythm. That divergence is adding some unpredictability, especially for those focusing on cross-asset correlation strategies.

We’re now focused on this week’s inflation release, particularly the core CPI for April. Analysts are anticipating a 0.3% gain over the previous month. That pace would still feed into the Federal Reserve’s preferred inflation gauge—the core PCE—but probably won’t be enough to shift policy gears any time soon.

Trading And Positioning Dynamics

From a trading point of view, the dollar index (DXY) hovers near a region where support could firm up—specifically around the 100.0 mark. However, early moves during the week could push the dollar slightly lower before any base forms. That short-term slippage might offer opportunities for re-entry, should the talks between Washington and Beijing continue to lean constructive.

Given the mix of policy noise and economic prints, we should expect more volatility around inflation-linked positions. What really matters is the trajectory and persistence of inflation surprises, more so than a single data point. If core inflation stays sticky, we’ll need to account for forward yields staying elevated, at least on the US side.

As for positioning, the taktical bias may require nimble adjustments. With early-week softness likely, especially if there’s any headline fatigue from the trade discussions, fading minor dollar rallies close to resistance areas could make sense. But once more concrete signs of resolution appear, quicker reversals may come into play.

In terms of scenario setups, we’re watching the tone of policymaker comments closely. If the perceived progress in trade relations holds and is backed by pressure in inflation data, the timing of the next directional move in rates markets could slip further out. This would, in most cases, reduce the likelihood of any abrupt policy change. Until then, skewing trades toward mean-reversion setups rather than momentum chasing might offer better entry points.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

A Hong Kong media outlet has reported that US-China tariff reductions will exceed 100%. The information comes from a source familiar with the situation, though no other credible sources have confirmed it yet.

The report is circulating on social media, raising caution about its accuracy. If accurate, this reduction surpasses the expected 50-60%, potentially easing negotiations between the US and China.

Implications Of Tariff Reductions

Should this report prove to be accurate, it suggests an intent from both sides to dramatically ease trade tensions, potentially faster and more broadly than previously forecast. A reduction above 100% likely indicates not only the rollback of existing tariffs but possibly the introduction of fresh trade incentives or regulatory adjustments that were not publicly anticipated. That being said, in situations where official channels have not substantiated the claims, we must tread carefully. The timing, sources, and motivations behind such reports all warrant scrutiny, particularly in markets as sensitive as derivatives, where even a rumour can disrupt pricing structures.

What’s interesting here is the scale of the supposed tariff movement. A percentage reduction above the full amount typically implies more than just a pullback—it hints at possible offsetting measures or reciprocal actions such as subsidies, restructured trade duties, or tax credits. If Washington and Beijing are entertaining that sort of concept, then many existing assumptions particularly around hedging models and volatility pricing may need revisiting rather soon. Parker’s recent remarks about demand-side support may now seem less relevant, or at the very least, in need of reevaluation with this context in mind.

From our vantage point, the telltale sign lies in the reaction of longer-dated options. These tend to price in structural changes rather than noise. Since this report began trending yesterday, we’ve observed a skew reversal near the three-month tenor, especially in contracts sensitive to raw materials and industrial inputs. Those of us tracking sector rotations will have noted that cyclical exposures have begun to outperform defensives—an early whisper of optimism that the market is beginning to price in something beyond standard posturing.

Market Reactions And Considerations

Still, until official confirmation emerges, we remain in a holding pattern. Historical precedence shows that premature positioning based on speculative reports rarely ends well. Instead, consider looking at spread convexity models—especially where implied distributions have shifted out of proportion with realised data. That could highlight where mispricings still linger.

It is worth observing how market makers adjust their delta exposure over the next 48 hours, particularly in risk reversals tied to Asian export names. If pricing continues to move in anticipation of trade policy shifts, expect pressure to build on those still leaning long volatility. Roberts pointed out last week that the Asia-linked gamma was already stretched. This could break that tension.

For now, we monitor the data flows, watch for early hints on trade desk positioning, and avoid reacting to headlines unsupported by hard evidence. These are the moments when overreaction becomes expensive, and patience becomes strategy.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US natural gas prices experienced a decline as increased inventory levels surpassed the expected demand from weather conditions. The Energy Information Administration reported that natural gas inventories rose last week beyond average market forecasts, pushing total stockpiles to 2.15 Tcf, which is 1.4% above the five-year average.

This marks the second consecutive week of triple-digit inventory builds, with storage transitioning from a 230 Bcf deficit in early March to the current surplus. Weather forecasts have improved with warmer conditions expected in the northern and southern regions of the US.

What we’ve seen over the past two weeks is a relatively quick switch from concern over a growing storage shortfall to now dealing with a surplus. The inventory build wasn’t just larger than expected—it came in clearly ahead of the seasonal trend, implying either demand is starting to take a backseat or injection rates are faster than the market is willing to price in. Whichever way it’s viewed, the fundamentals have shifted.

The move to 2.15 Tcf in storage, now above the five-year average by 1.4%, is not something to set aside. Two back-to-back triple-digit builds speak to either a misjudged demand picture or a stronger-than-anticipated production flow. While early March was defined by a 230 Bcf gap to historical storage norms, we’ve not only closed that gap, but flipped it. That doesn’t happen incidentally.

Forecasters now point to mild conditions across both northern and southern regions, and that undercuts one of the only supports natural gas had recently, which was weather-led demand. Heating needs in the north and early cooling activity in the south aren’t materialising in the way traders might’ve banked on. We should expect models to continue steering sentiment, but at this point more warmth likely translates to weaker consumption.

For gas options and futures, this changes the way we need to look at positioning. Calendar spreads have already started responding, but we believe more realignment is coming. Calendar strips out to winter are best watched for clues on how participants are managing storage strategies and hedging forward. Front month pressure, if these builds remain near current pace, has more room to extend.

From the pricing angle, backwardation that had started to creep in amid late-winter fears is being unwound. We’ve now stepped back from that scenario, and each new injection update becomes less about surprises and more about how steady this surplus begins to look. There’s now little room to support contracts without a major weather deviation or production hiccup. This also places more attention on LNG export flows and any sign of deviation there, as domestic oversupply will increasingly lean on outbound demand to find a balance.

We’re watching volatility measures to see whether this fresh surplus begins to cap implied movement. If warmer outlooks hold, and builds persist at pace, optionality may regress toward a lower vol regime heading into June. But any uptick in Gulf disruptions or pipeline constraints could flip that. It’s not a neutral environment yet, but we’re moving decisively away from near-term scarcity pricing. That’s how the curve is reading it already, and forward traders will have to factor that in.

Reactivity should focus first on storage cadence over the next three reports. If the pattern persists, expect re-pricing over Q3 contracts. Holding optional exposure but reducing delta risk near prompt becomes a more defensive way to approach the next cycle of data releases.

Eurostoxx futures rose by 1.1% in early European trading, with optimism stemming from US-China talks over the weekend. German DAX futures also saw an increase of 1.1%, while UK FTSE futures were up by 0.4%.

S&P 500 futures experienced a 1.5% gain, largely holding earlier gains against the dollar. The market is anticipating Bessent’s briefing along with a joint statement from both the US and China following their recent discussions.

Market Optimism

The early moves in equity futures indicate there is appetite for risk following diplomatic signals from two of the largest economies. Eurostoxx and DAX futures climbing by more than a per cent suggests a return of confidence—or at the very least, a willingness among participants to re-enter positions previously scaled back due to geopolitical uncertainty. The FTSE, while lagging slightly in comparison, still points to broader market alignment in sentiment rather than sector-specific drivers.

Looking at US equity futures, the stronger performance of the S&P 500—rising 1.5%—confirms that the momentum is being carried across the Atlantic. The fact that these contracts are managing to preserve gains amid a relatively steady dollar indicates there is no immediate rush into safe havens. Risk positioning has shifted—not drastically, but clearly—in response to the weekend’s diplomatic progress.

Bessent’s upcoming remarks, coupled with the anticipated statement jointly issued by both countries, seem to be anchoring expectations. Markets are assuming no worsening in rhetoric, and perhaps even more collaboration going forward. That’s not based on speculation, but on the timing and content of the convocation—scheduled appearances like these rarely happen in the absence of coordinated messaging.

Strategic Positioning

For short-term volatility traders, this kind of convergence between monetary and political signals usually narrows the distribution of outcomes. For now, implied volatilities haven’t collapsed, which allows for premium selling opportunities—especially where skew is yet to adjust to this new base case. Positioning should reflect this skew compression potential, more so in indices directly linked to supply chain or trade dependencies given recent headlines.

In the coming days, any change to the tone or timing of the joint communication could lead to readjustments across the forward curve. Strategies that rely on expiry-linked convexity could benefit if trimmed by duration in the front and allocated more dynamically at the wings. We’re keeping risk-reversal ratios tighter than usual, given how sensitive the reactions have been to macro-political headlines this quarter.

One reading of these futures moves is that traders are shaking off the worst-case scenarios they had baked in over the past fortnight. This allows spreads to widen in places where compression trades had become too crowded, particularly between European and US indices. With the euro holding steady and bond yields stable, there’s room for delta-neutral strategies to breathe again without being disturbed by currency-driven divergence.

There’s also a noticeable shift in how calendar spreads are pricing in assumptions of market calm. As these assumptions firm up over the next sessions, it serves to highlight where the options market has lagged in reassessing tail risks. We’ve opted to roll some realised vol positions, thereby capturing edge created by an overshoot in last week’s vol buyers, many of whom have started unwinding.

This sort of follow-through from futures and options flow matters, not only because of what it implies for trend strength, but because it lets us measure confidence in directional setups without relying only on ETF rebalancing. For now, we watch for where liquidity increases, particularly around delayed policy statements, and will adjust risk accordingly.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

EUR/USD Is Challenging A Key Trend Line

The pair is challenging the descending trend line established since 2023. There is a possibility of retesting the 50-DMA near 1.1070, and failure to hold this level could lead to a decline towards the March high of 1.1025/1.0950.

The EUR/USD currency pair, having failed to sustain its advance past a stubborn resistance near 1.1570, has since drifted lower. With each passing session, the slope becomes clearer—the highs are lower, the lows are following suit, and any attempt to lift the pair is met with a noticeable lack of conviction. The speed with which buyers step in has slowed, and we’re now watching a developing sequence that increasingly favours the downside.

Momentum indicators, particularly the MACD, have tipped their hand. With its signal line now consistently under the trigger, the setup speaks to fading participation from bullish interests. At the same time, price action has sunk below the 50-day moving average, which is no longer acting as a floor but rather as a short-term ceiling. That level, sitting around the 1.1070 mark, could now act as an area of renewed selling interest on any approach.

The Technical Picture Remains Bearish

The technical trend line stretching back to 2023 is being tested once more. The fact that it is being approached from above, and with slowing velocity, is telling. Multiple failed attempts to reclaim highs have left the path open for a deeper flush. If the price can’t reclaim or hold above 1.1070 in the short term, attention would naturally shift to the lows seen in March, at around 1.1025 and then further down towards 1.0950.

What we’re seeing is the behaviour of a market that’s losing its sense of urgency on the upside; rallies are being sold rather quickly, and dips are extending just a little further than expected each time. For those monitoring interest rate differentials or external catalysts like US inflation data, it’s worth noting how these macro drivers seem to be reinforcing the technical picture rather than contradicting it. The moves are aligned.

From our perspective, watching whether the pair can hold the 1.1025—1.0950 zone becomes the priority. A clean break there might not only accelerate the downward pace but also shift the broader structure to something more than just a temporary retracement from recent highs. Often in such technical conditions, options markets begin to price wider tails, and we’ve already begun noticing that in skew patterns shifting lower.

As a weekly guidepost, we ought to stay nimble around any return to the 1.1070 region. If price stalls again despite broader risk positivity or supportive ECB rhetoric, it would appear sellers remain in control. What matters less now is isolated bullish reads; what carries more weight is how consistently upside gets sold and downside keeps attracting follow-through.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is set to speak on China trade talks at 0700 GMT, a timing that coincides with China’s usual announcements on international matters. This situation could create headline risks, warranting attention.

Progress in Swiss Discussions

Bessent remarked that substantial progress was made in the US-China trade discussions. Conducted in Switzerland with vice-level Chinese officials and Ambassador Jamieson, the talks were deemed productive. President Trump has been briefed on the developments, with more details expected to be disclosed in the upcoming briefing.

Bessent’s scheduled statement, aligned so precisely with Beijing’s habitual external communications schedule, is not coincidental. It may have been designed to respond to an expected release or to preempt one. Diplomatic choreography at this hour of the morning often signals a desire to keep pace with, or even steer, financial and political narratives during Asian market hours. For derivative traders, the pre-market timing is as much a message in itself as the content of any announcement.

The talks in Switzerland, marked by direct involvement of figures such as Ambassador Jamieson and Chinese vice-level officials, suggest more than just procedural check-ins. If both Art Basel and a low-key diplomatic venue are used for formal negotiations, that would imply real movement beneath the surface. When the Secretary phrases progress as “substantial,” we can infer that an agreement is far enough along to begin softening public opposition or introducing expectations to the market.

President Trump has already been updated, which gives us a narrow window of informational asymmetry before fuller disclosures are made public. Once Bessent speaks, that buffer closes. Reaction in rates and FX could therefore arrive not during the call, but in the price action leading up to it. Timing decisions around this will need to take into account options positioning that was likely built ahead of tonight’s Asia open. Watch closely for volume in front-end contracts, particularly where political headlines feed into duration uncertainty.

European Market Inclusion

It’s also worth noting the choice of delivering remarks in GMT hours—this puts Europe directly in earshot. We interpret this as a deliberate attempt to include European markets in the messaging, perhaps to gauge appetite for coordinated policy gestures or to calm bond market nerves around macro impacts. That would influence short-term gamma strategies, particularly where Central European rate expectations remain loosely anchored.

With so much hinging on messaging rather than concrete shifts, it becomes harder to rely on conventional data flow. Instead, we’ve been examining positioning sentiment and optionality around USDCNH pairs and short-dated vol, which present more immediate signals of how professional money is adjusting.

One would do best not to ignore base case planning around uncertainty premiums. As markets digest not just the content but also the tone and intent behind a carefully timed disclosure, reflexive reactions in implied volatility and term structure behaviour warrant close tracking. Let’s be clear—this type of event has trigger potential far beyond the trade desk.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Silver prices (XAG/USD) have risen for the third straight session, reaching approximately $32.90 per troy ounce during Asian trading on Monday. This follows news of Pan American Silver’s acquisition of MAG Silver Corp, valued at about $2.1 billion.

This deal provides Pan American Silver access to a 44% stake in the Juanicipio Silver mine in Mexico. The transaction has been approved by both companies and is set to close in late 2025.

Geopolitical tensions contribute to Silver’s appeal as a safe-haven asset. India and Pakistan continue to experience tension, and Ukraine’s call for a ceasefire with Russia was dismissed by Moscow.

However, Silver’s upward trajectory might be restricted due to the easing of safe-haven demand. Positive US-China trade discussions have buoyed optimism, with formal negotiations planned and progress reported by both sides.

The Federal Reserve’s emphasis on inflation and labour market risks further affects Silver prices. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell ruled out preemptive rate cuts despite economic concerns linked to tariffs.

Silver attracts interest as a historical store of value and a medium of exchange. Its price is influenced by geopolitical instability, interest rates, the US Dollar’s strength, and industrial demand.

The recent upswing in silver to just shy of the $33 per troy ounce mark reflects a sharp acceleration in short-term momentum, not merely supported by geopolitical unease but further reinforced by real corporate movement in the sector. The acquisition by Pan American, acquiring nearly half of the key Mexican asset, should not be interpreted as a one-off transaction. We’re watching a business align itself more tightly with physical reserves, a move that tends to underpin market confidence in tangible backing.

That said, we can’t ignore the more buoyant trade rhetoric emerging from the US and China. There’s reason to believe that if formalised agreements gather pace, much of the fear premium priced into precious metals like silver may soften. This makes it less likely we’ll see overly aggressive upside without a fresh trigger. Recent high-level comments about progress should temper any aggressive positioning aimed at hedging outright risk, particularly as newsflow stabilises rather than escalates.

From a monetary standpoint, Powell’s comments last week hold weight. His refusal to bow to pressure for preemptive easing tells us inflation remains far from tamed in central bank eyes. Whether markets agree or not is another matter, but for traders of derivatives, it’s the implied forward curve and rate expectations that count. Any surprises in economic data that tie Powell’s hands could trigger exaggerated market responses, given current speculative longs.

Meanwhile, the dollar hasn’t weakened persistently, which suggests the metal’s rally may have found more legs from temporary safe-haven flows and repositioning around global events. The dollar’s resilience, for now at least, implies commodity-linked currencies continue to face headwinds. Silver, priced in dollars, walks a tightrope when the greenback firms, acting both as a brake and a rebalancer when moves become overextended.

Positioning shows an increase in futures interest, but not at panic levels. This isn’t a full chase higher; it’s more like cautious reallocation, possibly encouraged by anticipation of tighter supply. The industrial side of demand hasn’t shifted dramatically just yet, though if manufacturing data in Asia and Europe begin to firm further into the summer months, physical consumption could finally meet speculative enthusiasm.

In the near term, it’s going to come down to how convincing the recovery narratives in global manufacturing hold up. Watch to see if forward-looking PMI numbers improve into June. If they disappoint, silver’s industrial credentials take a back seat.

It’s not useful to expect a one-way move. Price swings are being shaped by contrasting themes—real-world tension vs economic normalisation, speculative appetite vs foundational fundamentals. We are tracking each with equal attention.

Keep an eye on real interest rates, not just nominal ones. Rising real yields, especially in the US, tend to pressure non-yielding assets like silver. If inflation data stays firm without a proportional rise in wage growth, suppression of real yields could become a factor again.

Timing will be key; macro news flow tends to front-run broader sentiment. Adjust sizing if volatility increases on headline risk. Reassess hedge weighting if forward guidance from the Fed begins to show cracks or becomes internally inconsistent.

The upcoming week will feature key economic data, such as Australian labour market statistics and U.S. inflation and retail sales figures. Monday anticipates minimal activity, whereas Tuesday will see Japan’s BoJ summary, U.K.’s claimant count, earnings index, and unemployment rate, alongside U.S. inflation data. On Wednesday, Australia will reveal its wage price index, with Thursday bringing its employment change figures, and the U.K. disclosing GDP data. The U.S. will focus on PPI, retail sales, and jobless claims, with Fed Chair Powell speaking at a conference.

In the U.S., core CPI m/m is anticipated at 0.3%, up from 0.1% last month, with CPI y/y steady at 2.4%. Recent inflation readings were influenced by volatile sectors like energy and travel. Analysts suggest tariff effects, notably on auto prices, may begin to drive core goods inflation. Though, full tariff impacts remain unseen.

Australian Labor Market Update

Australia’s wage price index is expected at 0.8% q/q, slightly above the previous 0.7%, but wage growth remains subdued. Employment is projected to rise by 20.9K, with unemployment steady at 4.1%. The labour force participation rate has shifted from a peak of 67.2% to 66.7–66.8%, aligning with softer population growth.

In the U.S, retail sales are forecasted flat at 0.0% m/m, after a 1.4% prior increase. Recent gains in retail sales, driven by vehicle purchases anticipating tariffs, signal strong consumer momentum. Future spending depends on whether March’s strength represented front-loaded demand, with auto sales suggesting continued robustness.

Markets look poised for a week shaped by a busy data calendar, and a clearer picture will emerge as we move through key regional releases. With price pressures still drawing market attention, Tuesday’s U.S. inflation figures could provide a valuable gauge of where we stand. The marginal rise expected in monthly core inflation—up to 0.3% from 0.1%—reflects the impact of more persistent categories. While energy prices and travel costs remain unpredictable, developments in auto prices, connected to tariff changes, are beginning to influence the broader data backdrop more noticeably. We see this as a prelude to firmer goods-related inflation later in the year.

Retail conditions, particularly in the States, are becoming more uneven. After unusually strong data in March—likely fuelled by early vehicle purchases prompted by tariff warnings—the flat print now anticipated signals a potential shift. The key point here isn’t weakness in demand, but whether earlier enthusiasm cannibalised future spending. If shoppers pulled forward purchases, we might see quieter months ahead, especially in durable goods. Still, the strength in underlying metrics, such as non-auto categories, will offer more ground-level insight on true household sentiment.

Fed Chair Powell’s Remarks

Powell’s remarks on Thursday will tie together the week’s broader themes. Recent speeches have signalled caution, not least because inflation is proving stickier than first projected. We’ll be watching closely for any indication on how policymakers plan to respond to sustained consumer activity or an uptick in prices driven by imported goods costs. Following the last Fed meeting, where the path forward was left largely unchanged, comments delivered this week could either reinforce expectations or unsettle near-term rate bets.

In the U.K., the focus will turn to the labour market, which has begun to show early stages of slack. Tuesday’s employment and earnings data will help confirm whether the recent uptick in jobless claims marks a broader trend. Of particular interest will be the pace of wage growth—higher average earnings may signal inflation risks that haven’t yet worked through the system. GDP data out Thursday may reinforce this view if domestic output keeps losing pace relative to services costs. Should the domestic trend continue, it adds support to the likelihood of monetary easing down the road.

Meanwhile, Australia remains a study in balance. Despite limited wage gains—the expected quarterly reading is barely up from the previous figure—employment growth continues at a moderate pace. At face value, a 20.9K jobs gain with steady unemployment appears healthy, but waning population growth has distorted headline results. Participation is subtly declining, hovering below its own recent peak, masking the softness beneath. Any deviation this week, in either the wage price index or employment change, may quickly feed into rate expectations for the Reserve Bank.

In Japan, central bank minutes released Tuesday may generate some local market moves, particularly if there are any signs of surprise disagreement among monetary authorities. Given attempts to gradually shift away from ultra-loose policy, even modest changes can ripple across yen positioning. Although volumes are typically light earlier in the week, headline-sensitive conditions mean thin trading may lead to outsized moves.

Overall, this week presents a series of measured tests. Reaction will depend not only on the numbers themselves but also on how markets digest the broader implications—whether inflation remains persistent enough to deter cuts, whether growth is slowing without a safety net, and whether consumers have truly adjusted their behaviour ahead of time.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US-China talks over the weekend have reportedly been positive, with Trump stating a productive meeting took place. Unlike previous instances, China has not refuted US claims and maintains an optimistic stance, suggesting a change in approach.

Both nations are expected to issue a rare joint statement following discussions in Switzerland, though the timing remains uncertain. China has metaphorically referred to the outcome as “delicious,” implying the eventual announcement will be highly favourable on a global scale.

Market Reactions

Market reactions have been positive as a result of the meeting, though the specifics remain crucial for future negotiations. Reports suggest an “economic and trade consultation mechanism” was proposed, serving as the foundation for ongoing US-China discussions.

The immediate implications for current tariffs, including existing 145% levels, are unclear. Trump hinted at a “total reset,” but specifics remain ambiguous regarding negotiation intentions and tariff alterations. A joint statement might suggest easing tariffs to facilitate negotiations within a certain timeline.

Observers are cautious, draw comparisons to the unsuccessful Phase One trade deal from Trump’s first term, and anticipate further negotiations in the context of ongoing decoupling between the two nations.

What we know so far is that discussions between the United States and China have moved past confrontation and into something that, at least externally, looks more constructive. Unlike in previous cycles, where conflicting public statements often followed high-level meetings, this time Beijing has not contradicted Washington’s account. Instead, there’s a noticeable shift — a clear willingness to present a unified front. For those of us watching policy shifts from a short-term exposure standpoint, this matters. A coordinated narrative implies fewer disruptive surprises.

Still, nothing concrete has been laid out yet. No tariff rollbacks have been officially detailed, and the so-called “reset” remains an idea, not an action. Underneath the warm diplomatic phrases, tariffs are still as high as 145%, providing little immediate relief for those in export-sensitive sectors. While rhetoric is softening, positioning should consider that material changes tend to lag behind diplomatic statements. Talk, however friendly, has yet to change the pricing environment.

Economic And Trade Consultation Mechanism

There are murmurs of an “economic and trade consultation mechanism” being set up — a phrase which might sound vague at first, but we should recognise it for what it could be: a procedural framework, likely with institutional staffing and monthly check-ins. It would not exist purely for appearances. If implemented, such a structure could start to formalise communication channels and reduce the likelihood of erratic policy changes. This has potential to dampen volatility, but only if terms are binding or at least regular. So far, timelines or enforceability haven’t been verified.

The key point here is timing. Sporadic comments from Washington suggest goodwill, yet a joint statement from both parties — something rarely issued in past standoffs — hasn’t materialised. Its delay isn’t surprising; these declarations take careful assembly. But without it, traders should not treat risk momentum as one-directional. We understand from past cycles that political sway can reverse sharply, especially when driven by domestic agendas. As such, we aren’t adjusting hedging strategies just yet.

Comparisons to earlier trade accords do carry some weight. Observers looking back at the Phase One agreement will recall how early optimism led to badly misplaced expectations. Those who got ahead of events then were forced into defensive positions not long after. At the time, there was similarly suggested cooperation, but the outcomes were far less than what was anticipated. This context should shape our approach now. We are watching for follow-through, not just friendliness.

Policies linked to decoupling initiatives are still alive, particularly within technology transfer areas. Many of these measures require legislative reversal to unwind. Because of this, any strategic moves based on scaling back of enforcement or changes in trade regimes should be based on documentable progress — not statements alone. Until there is written confirmation, paired with defined timelines for tariff reductions or procedural reforms, positions reliant on softer trade exposures still carry high directional risk.

It is also worth pointing out that media tone has lightened — this isn’t without influence. Positive headlines often prompt mechanical response from models and high-frequency systems, which can amplify short momentum moves. But headline optimism not backed by treaties or formally signed protocols tends to fade once trading desks reprice forward risk. We have seen this occur repeatedly in prior cycles. And recent comments point to the idea that this optimism is about future possibility, not yet about concrete change.

Restraint in positioning remains the preferred route in the short window. Active strategies are better served by waiting for terms to be released, preferably in joint form, and then assessing not only the content but also which arms of government are set to enforce the terms. Until then, synthetic spreads and volatility structures should be handled conservatively, especially in currency-linked and auto-related exposures.

We should be prepared for a sharp response once clarity arrives — but not presume that delay equals failure. These processes are slow by design, and patience is needed. For now, until words turn into mechanisms and figures, actions should be prudent and nimble, guided by levels rather than storylines.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Gold prices in the Philippines dropped on Monday. The price per gram was PHP 5,846.05, a decrease from PHP 5,929.07 on Friday.

For Gold measured per tola, the cost decreased to PHP 68,187.17, down from PHP 69,155.48. In terms of a Troy Ounce, the price was recorded at PHP 181,832.60.

Role Of Central Banks

Central banks are the largest holders of Gold, using it to bolster currency during unstable times. They purchased 1,136 tonnes in 2022, the biggest annual purchase recorded.

Gold typically has an inverse correlation with the US Dollar and Treasuries. When the Dollar weakens, Gold usually rises as a hedge against economic instability.

Variations in Gold prices occur due to geopolitical factors or fears of recession. The relationship with interest rates is also crucial as Gold prices often increase with lower rates and fall with higher ones.

With prices seeing a notable dip from Friday’s levels, those of us closely monitoring short-term momentum can begin factoring in a recalibration of positioning. The fall from PHP 5,929.07 to PHP 5,846.05 per gram isn’t just nominal—it reflects a broader response to external pressures, particularly stemming from recent shifts in global sentiment around inflation expectations and currency strength. When viewed per tola, the drop to PHP 68,187.17—down nearly a full thousand pesos—underlines the softening demand or waning of speculative pushes that previously kept higher bid levels stable.

From what we’ve observed, fluctuations like these often follow cues from movements in the Dollar and demand for safe-haven assets. It helps to consider the Dollar’s recent firmness, which has been nudging Gold lower despite modest geopolitical tremors. The inverse dynamic there isn’t just theoretical—it’s one we see play out in real time. For traders operating on leverage, this can affect margin requirements and execution timing, especially if volatility remains below average and directional moves are brief but persistent.

Impact Of Interest Rates

Last week’s numbers still echo the impact of prominent institutional behaviour. In 2022, global central banks—who by far dominate physical accumulation—purchased over 1,100 tonnes of Gold. That set a new record, highlighting how state players respond when inflation hedges become more attractive than sovereign debt. These reserve managers aren’t reacting impulsively—they are building buffers against long-term currency erosion and diversifying away from traditional holdings in uncertain periods.

Rates, however, are not backing Bulls at the moment. Higher interest rates tend to increase the yield on cash and comparable short-term instruments, undercutting the appeal of holding metals that generate no income. If policymakers reinforce hawkish stances and issue stronger rate guidance in the coming weeks, we’ll likely see continued pressure. Traders focusing on derivatives tied to Gold’s forward curve must consider how expectations for real yields will develop, particularly if inflation metrics in the upcoming cycle fail to cool.

Fears of recession, if carried further by weaker manufacturing data or heightened tensions in Eastern Europe, could provide temporary relief, especially across longer-dated contracts. But that depends entirely on where the Dollar moves next.

We’re tracking subtle shifts more than sharp turns right now—which means acting quickly on smaller breakouts while maintaining discipline on expiry and leverage risk. Directional conviction is lower than earlier in the quarter. Best to remain descriptive in our execution—avoiding overextension—especially when cross-asset volatility levels remain contained. Much of the movement this week might come not from spot changes, but expectations around when rate cuts could plausibly resume.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.