Gold prices have experienced a decline, trading around $3,217 per ounce, a drop of over 3% from the previous session. This decrease is due to improved global risk sentiment and a stronger US Dollar, reducing Gold’s appeal as a safe-haven asset.

The easing of geopolitical tensions, such as the US-China trade agreement and improved relations between India and Pakistan, has also impacted Gold prices. The US Dollar Index trading above 100.60 makes Gold more expensive for those holding non-dollar currencies.

Impact Of Us Consumer Price Index

Market attention is now on the upcoming US Consumer Price Index release, which could affect the Federal Reserve’s policy decisions and subsequently influence Gold’s value. Gold is currently below significant technical levels, with the next support at $3,200, and potential declines towards $3,150 and $3,000 if support fails.

Gold remains inversely correlated with the US Dollar and risk assets, often rising with geopolitical instability or recession fears. Central banks, particularly in emerging economies, are increasing Gold reserves, adding 1,136 tonnes in 2022, the highest since records began. Gold’s price is influenced by various factors, including geopolitical events, interest rates, and currency values.

While we’ve witnessed a sharp pullback in Gold, there’s more to unpack than simply pinning the move on improved confidence or Dollar strength. The price has come off by more than 3% since the previous session and sits now around $3,217 per ounce — marking a clear break from last week’s relatively steady stance. Risk appetite is on the mend globally, driving demand for yield rather than safety, and Gold, typically the go-to in times of economic or geopolitical uncertainty, is naturally seeing outflows in this environment.

This improved sentiment may feel a touch fragile. Market participants are factoring in greater cooperation between major powers — we’ve noted a softening in some international flashpoints, including the easing trade discord between the U.S. and China. Diplomatic warming elsewhere, notably between India and Pakistan, has further cooled nerves that previously drove safe-haven demand. When tensions ease, Gold typically loses some of its defensive allure, and that pattern is playing out now.

Resistance And Technical Levels

We shouldn’t ignore that the US Dollar remains firm, with the Dollar Index persistently hovering above the 100.60 mark. This alone dampens non-Dollar buyers’ interest in Gold due to its higher relative cost. From a tactical standpoint, this adds a layer of resistance for any Gold recovery in the short term — when the Dollar has firm wind behind it, Gold tends to feel the drag.

All eyes now turn to the release of the U.S. Consumer Price Index. What markets discover in these inflation figures will likely chart the near-term path for the Fed’s stance. If hotter-than-expected, speculation may resume for tighter policy extensions, reinforcing Dollar positions and possibly putting more pressure on non-yielding assets like Gold. On the flip side, a softness in prices could be a green light for moderation, giving support to Gold bulls.

Right now, Gold is trading below some previously well-held technical zones. Support at $3,200 is being tested, and chatter has already turned to lower markers: $3,150 is near-term, but if that fails to hold, the market could start flirting with psychological support closer to $3,000. We’re aware that moves of this kind don’t play out gracefully — should volume spike on the way down, technical selling could accelerate, dragging support levels with it.

Historically, we’ve seen Gold rise when monetary tightening stalls, geopolitical risks flare, or recession signals deepen. While these elements aren’t in play with full force this week, they haven’t disappeared. Notably, the longer-term backdrop still includes consistent central bank buying, especially from emerging markets. Just last year, 1,136 tonnes were added to global reserves — the highest annual increase on record.

That data shouldn’t be taken as immediate fuel for price lifts but does provide a longer-term undercurrent of support. After all, central banks usually act with longer timeframes in mind, adding physical Gold to buffer against currency fluctuations and external shocks. These purchases help underpin the asset during periods of softness and may cap deeper drawdowns, particularly if prices drift closer to cost-average zones for those institutions.

For traders, this becomes less about timing the precise bottom and more about understanding what causes correlations to shift directionally. With volatility down and Fed uncertainty still hanging, we might expect tighter trading ranges in the coming sessions — but that false calm can change quickly once CPI data hits. Trading around macro data releases demands tight risk parameters, as any sharp deviation can launch directional moves with velocity.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

BOE policymaker Megan Greene notes that inflation persistence indicators remain elevated. Medium-term inflation expectations are showing a slight increase, which is a concern.

The Bank of England recently cut rates, but differing views among central bank officials indicate ongoing internal debates. Despite some positive movement in wage and inflation measures, the overall levels are still considered too high by Greene.

Caution Within The Bank

Greene’s remarks suggest a degree of caution within the Bank, hinting that premature optimism about the inflation outlook may be misplaced. The upward drift in medium-term expectations underscores the challenge faced by policymakers: while some short-term figures appear to be improving, the broader picture still reflects price pressure that is too sticky for comfort. Markets had previously leaned into the idea of a more sustained easing cycle following the recent rate cut, but we ought to be mindful that a full-blown pivot could take longer to materialise.

The divergence among committee members reflects exactly what we’ve expected — a split between those who focus on current data showing signs of relief, and those like Greene, who keep one eye firmly on underlying measures that move more slowly. That divergence matters because it feeds into the uncertainty about timing and scale of future rate moves. For our part, we should give weight to the more conservative assessments, particularly when expectations begin influencing real-world behaviour, which can entrench price dynamics further.

Interestingly, although some measures such as wage growth have shifted marginally in a more favourable direction, they haven’t done so quickly or cleanly. For derivatives traders, an asymmetric approach is warranted. One-sided bets on aggressive easing could easily come undone if near-term inflation prints remain hot or expectations continue drifting up. Spreads centred on gradual cuts, or positioned for policy remaining steady longer than priced, may provide a better balance of risk versus reward.

Growing Divergence On The Committee

Volatility pricing — especially tied to near-term policy meetings — may now start to reflect the growing divergence on the committee. That increases the value of optionality. We can take advantage of wider pricing bands, using well-timed structures that benefit from overreactions to dovish headlines, while hedging against sharp repricing on the hawkish side.

Market participants should not only follow headline metrics but also dissect core indicators more closely tied to decision-making. Greene’s concern over embedded inflation expectations is less about a single data point and more about momentum. We must respect that flow — it moves slowly and tends not to reverse until policy decisively tightens or demand visibly weakens.

In short, we are not yet in the clear. Treat every assumption of a well-defined easing path with suspicion. Make use of the uncertainty. Pricing in flexibility at this stage may be the most prudent way forward.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Doximity will announce its fourth-quarter fiscal 2025 results on 15 May. The previous quarter saw earnings exceed expectations by 36.36%, contributing to a four-quarter average surprise of 26.00%. Current revenue estimates stand at $133.8 million, while earnings are projected at 27 cents per share.

Doximity’s recent performance is believed to be bolstered by its expanding product portfolio, notably point-of-care and formulary modules, which experienced over 100% growth year-on-year. Integrated programs allowing faster campaign launches increased revenue recognition in the fourth quarter, and their client portal now benefits more than half of their pharmaceutical partners.

Despite a potential growth in top-line results, fourth-quarter revenue growth might see a moderate 13% year-on-year increase. New product launches and commitments from major clients during the third quarter led to considerable pull-forward, potentially affecting sequential growth.

Doximity operates amidst macroeconomic uncertainties affecting some segments, such as health systems. Tools like AI-powered services saw a 60% usage increase in the third quarter, suggesting enhanced product engagement. However, there is no clear indication that Doximity will exceed earnings expectations this quarter. Meanwhile, other medical sector companies show potential for stronger earnings performance in the upcoming reporting cycle.

Given the information to date, it’s clear that Doximity’s growth dynamics have shifted from pure expansion into more measured integration and maturity of its offerings. The company delivered a solid upside surprise last quarter, outpacing consensus forecasts by a considerable margin. Over the past year, it’s consistently beaten expectations, indicating strong fundamental execution. Still, this quarter, the picture is slightly more muted.

The likely revenue total of $133.8 million signals just over a 13% rise compared to the same period last year, which isn’t weak but falls short of the breakneck growth seen in earlier periods. Part of that slowdown stems from client activity in earlier quarters. Some of the revenue we’re seeing now was effectively pulled forward due to new deals and product launches that accelerated onboarding and campaign starts. That materially shifts the quarter-on-quarter picture.

From our point of view, this sort of pattern often flags a transition from aggressive early-stage expansion to steadier scaling. Launches like the point-of-care modules and formulary integrations have doubled in size, which is no small feat. But once those offerings are adopted by half of the target audience, like pharmaceutical partners in this case, incremental growth naturally tempers.

It’s also worth paying attention to user behaviour. The 60% jump in usage of AI-driven tools in the third quarter hints at a stickier user base, something we regard as a positive long-term indicator. However, increased usage doesn’t always immediately translate into revenue at the top. That distinction matters when assessing the actual trading opportunities presented.

The macro backdrop introduces added texture. Health systems, a core customer group, are still navigating inflationary pressure and shifting reimbursement models. That uncertainty can delay decision-making cycles or contract renewals, which in turn affects visibility in the short term.

Traders who are navigating options or value-adjusted positions tied to companies with this type of earnings cadence should interpret the likelihood of a flat outcome. While past beats often encourage bullish sentiment, the forecast growth rate and prior pull-forward both argue against expecting an outsize positive move on the release.

By staying close to the numbers and recognising that the surprise trend may not extend into this period, we have room to build structured trades that reflect a narrower outcome range. The report’s specifics are likely to matter more than the headline figures — with revenue quality, segment performance, and commentary on fiscal 2026 guidance driving more of the directional flow.

There’s also the comparative angle to note. Whilst Doximity’s performance remains steady, other names in the broader healthcare vertical appear poised to show faster gains. That relative strength shift could affect hedging strategies and pair trades. Keeping individual earnings quality distinct from sector-wide flows may help avoid chasing movements that aren’t grounded in a firm read-through.

As the timing of campaigns becomes easier and the tools more widely adopted, the delta in quarter-on-quarter performance may continue to narrow. This report offers fewer variables than we’ve seen over the past few quarters, but remains a useful gauge for sentiment in digital health as a whole. For us, the scope lies less in anticipating a pop and more in structuring for asymmetric skew if execution does happen to surprise on the upside again.

Mexico’s industrial output in March recorded a year-on-year increase of 1.9%, surpassing the predicted 1.5%. This growth indicates a stronger-than-expected performance in the country’s industrial sector for the month.

The EUR/USD currency pair faced continued pressure, dropping to five-week lows below 1.1100. Demand for the US Dollar surged following a 90-day trade truce and planned tariff reductions between the US and China.

Economic Trends in Currency Markets

The GBP/USD pair’s rebound faced a cap just above 1.3200, as the US Dollar gained strength. This resurgence in the Greenback followed announcements in the US-China trade agreement.

Gold prices moved towards $3,200 per troy ounce with stabilisation evident despite broader market risk appetite improvements. These developments in the gold market followed positive US-China trade discussions.

Key market influences include US-China trade relations, which could impact Oil markets and other sectors. Meanwhile, US retail sales, inflation, and consumer sentiment figures may provoke considerable market movements.

Memecoins such as WIF, BOME, and FLOKI experienced double-digit gains, boosted by the positive US-China tariff agreement. The crypto market showed increased optimism following these developments.

Industrial Output and Market Reactions

The recent uptick in Mexico’s March industrial output—coming in at 1.9% against an expected 1.5%—points to firmer underlying demand in manufacturing and construction, possibly tied to expanding infrastructure and nearshoring trends within North America. Month-on-month movements were less prominent, but the year-on-year gain should not be disregarded. It suggests supply chains might be stabilising faster than anticipated, and any persistent strength here could feed further into regional economic resilience. The implications for exposure on Latin American equity-linked instruments or industrial commodities derivatives are worth watching, particularly if figures next month reflect sustained momentum from domestic demand rather than external trade alone.

Meanwhile, the EUR/USD depreciation—now reaching levels not seen in over a month—signals developing patterns in safe-haven flows. The Greenback has been on a rally as traders recalibrate around reduced tariff tensions post-truce. Though truce periods in previous cycles haven’t always sustained long-term advantage for the Dollar, the sharp repositioning this time appears more reactive to sentiment rather than fundamentals. That pressure on the common currency is being compounded by softer economic activity in parts of the Eurozone. For us, options traders may be pricing in elevated volatility, especially if upcoming inflation prints in the US outperform again.

Sterling’s failed breakout above the 1.3200 handle underscores the strength of Greenback demand across the board. Though domestic data out of the UK has been mixed, the ceiling was defined by broader Dollar buying, rather than a real rejection of Sterling. Still, a return to two-sided price action will probably depend on upcoming unemployment and wage growth figures from the UK. A possible rate hold from the Bank of England later this quarter may dull GBP upside appeal.

Gold’s steady movement towards the $3,200 mark—despite improving macro risk sentiment—raises interesting prospects. In previous trade normalisation cycles between major powers, gold often corrected downwards; now, however, we’re seeing more gradual movement. It seems like the market is treating any hints of rate cuts with caution, but layering in gold exposure as a hedge against large-scale rate surprises. For us, volatility compression in the metal may lead to renewed interest in straddles or calendar spreads.

Important macro events ahead—the US retail sales numbers, inflation prints, and consumer confidence surveys—are likely to test current market pricing. Any upside surprises, particularly in retail or headline CPI, could delay rate cut expectations and send the Dollar higher once more. That could spill into energy markets as well, depending on what it signals for demand and growth.

On the digital asset side, moves in meme-centric tokens have been aggressive, helped along by retail optimism post-trade developments. Widespread double-digit moves are more momentum-driven than fundamental, but we’ve seen leverage returning to parts of the market that had largely gone quiet for weeks. Any pullback in broader crypto risk will likely test long positioning in these names. That said, residual optimism in DeFi protocols and altcoin volumes could support another short-term extension if macro remains benign. Price-based signals should be watched closely.

We’ll be observing near-term options volume across G10 FX, crude, and gold with particular care. Constant recalibrations in sentiment around China-US relations are pushing capital swiftly between assets. Strategically, the moment calls for selective risk-taking, ideally tied to macro catalysts with clearer timing.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

One of Donald Trump’s key aims has been to reduce long-term interest rates by focusing on lowering the deficit. A smaller deficit impacts the long-term premium, with concerns over the US being on an “unsustainable path” potentially leading to higher taxes or increased money printing. This future risk may cause buyers of US debt to demand higher interest rates.

Short-term rates are influenced by central bank policy, while long-term rates depend on market factors. These include future central bank policies, inflation expectations, and the future supply and demand of Treasury debt issuance. Economic growth prospects improve as trade barriers lower, potentially raising economic activity and sustaining inflation.

Framework For Fiscal Policy And Macroeconomics

With improved global growth conditions, strong economic activity might prevent rate cuts, impacting long-term yields. There is a possibility that long-term interest rates could increase in the second half of 2025. Once they roll over, a new low might be established.

What we see in the above is a framework for assessing how fiscal policy and macroeconomic expectations are beginning to steer long-dated yields. The original focus is on how political efforts to cut the deficit could help bring down the term premium—the compensation investors demand for holding longer-term debt. The concern raised is that if the US deficit is not addressed in a convincing way, it could trigger anxiety among bondholders about future fiscal stability. That concern has a tangible impact: those buying long-term government bonds may demand a higher interest rate to offset uncertain risks, such as inflation, tax increases, or the dilutionary effect of excessive money creation.

The market doesn’t treat interest rates as static across all timescales. We know that short-end movements tend to mirror what central banks communicate—rate decisions, policy stances, and monetary operations. But for ten years out and beyond, things aren’t as reactive. Instead, they reflect expectations: future Fed moves, the trajectory of the economy, and the balance of government borrowing and investor demand.

Right now, economic activity appears stable and even improving in places, in part because barriers to commerce have been coming down. This could translate to more trade and corporate investment over time, both of which contribute to faster output growth and firmer prices. Inflation supported by such organic growth is less likely to trigger emergency responses, but it still influences rate forecasting.

Opportunities And Market Timing

What this means, especially for those focused on volatility around the long end, is that bets on a steep rate decline may not play out cleanly in the near term. If growth persists into next year, the space left for easing narrows. Stronger macro data prints—read: consistent employment, solid purchasing activity, and stable inflation—will likely delay any loosening by the Fed, further supporting elevated long-run rates. In such conditions, long duration instruments may underperform, particularly before the middle of 2025.

As for timing, there’s a mention that yields could rise again into the second half of next year. The phrasing around “rolling over” and forming “a new low” implies that we might not yet have seen the upper limit in yields. Once that peak is behind us, we may find a floor—likely lower than before if risk sentiment or growth expectations begin to cool. That inflection, if supported by data and policy shifts, could open windows for realignment in fixed income portfolios.

From where we’re standing, this presents some opportunities, but not all are immediate. Traders should remain alert to upward moves in long-dated rates during periods of strong headline figures. Leverage and exposure on longer-dated maturities should be monitored closely. If short covering or forced rebalancing begins near expected yield highs, positioning could shift quickly. Timing entries too early could be expensive. Patience is more than just caution here—it’s a method.

Watching issuance pace from the Treasury and any comments from policymakers on deficit control will also help us read the room. For now, we continue to lean on cautious calibration. Data and credibility remain the driving forces.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

This week in the UK, key economic data will be released, including jobs figures on Tuesday. The job market is experiencing a cooling trend without dramatic weakening, with unemployment likely to rise and wage growth slowing.

On Thursday, a first-quarter GDP report will be published, following February’s 0.5% GDP rise. Despite a projected March slowdown, the first quarter is expected to display robust growth, albeit influenced by volatile manufacturing, with government spending expected to support ongoing growth.

Trade Relations And Impact On The Pound

The pound is experiencing support due to improved trade relations, including agreements with the US and India. Upcoming EU negotiations and actions by the Bank of England add to this, potentially maintaining downward pressure on EUR/GBP, possibly pushing the rate below 0.840.

The economic snapshot heading into this week paints a relatively stable picture, yet not one without its moving parts. Tuesday’s job figures should shed some light on the overall strength of the labour market, particularly in terms of employment resilience. While we’ve seen clear evidence that the hiring spree has tapered off, it’s not collapsing wholesale. Unemployment is, by most indicators, drifting slightly higher, but it’s doing so in a rather orderly way—more of a soft easing than a sharp deterioration. Wage growth is inching lower too, which in our view reflects easing inflation pressures rather than signs of internal structural weakness.

For traders, this kind of data shift doesn’t scream alarm; it quietly nudges expectations. Forward-looking rates pricing will likely adjust at the margins—not in sweeping revaluations, but in small steps shaped by nuanced changes in employment and earnings data. Derivatives tied to short-term UK rates might see recalibrations on Tuesday if the wage numbers undershoot market forecasts. In that case, we would expect implied volatility to tick up slightly, particularly on front-end contracts.

Gdp Release And Market Expectations

Turning to Thursday’s GDP release, the data should give a more composite view of where things are headed economically. February’s bounce was clearly positive, aided by stronger business and consumer activity, but fairly lumpy due to manufacturing volatility. Any March deceleration has already been anticipated in market pricing, so reactions are likely to centre on how much momentum is still evident when smoothing out monthly anomalies. The first quarter as a whole should look healthy on paper. We think that’s giving markets a baseline of confidence—growth hasn’t collapsed, and policy tightening’s bite is manageable so far.

If government outlays remain steady or even expand marginally, it will be another pillar supporting Gilt markets. Medium-dated contracts may respond by further pulling rate-cut timelines into Q4, especially if the GDP numbers beat the consensus. This could offer scope for yield curve steepening trades. Still, we’d caution against overcommitting to one direction. The economy isn’t firing on all cylinders, and upside surprises may not carry through into the next quarter without confirmation.

Then there’s sterling, quietly making gains behind the headlines. The currency is benefiting from something more tangible than sentiment. Improved trade terms—specifically with the United States and India—are providing real-world shifts in current account balances and longer-term investment flows. The result: solid underlying demand for the pound in various pairs. As we see it, this support is being reinforced by an ongoing review of EU-facing deals and the Bank’s policy tone, which is still relatively firm compared with peers.

This dynamic brings EUR/GBP into sharp focus. With sellers leaning in each time the pair tries to firm, and buyers unwilling to step in aggressively, we could see a test below 0.840 sooner rather than later. If Thursday’s growth data aligns with the stronger end of expectations, especially in services output, that downside level may not hold. We’re watching implied vols around that strike—they’ve been gradually picking up, indicating more movement is anticipated even if spot hasn’t broken out yet.

Energy prices, and their knock-on effects on consumer spending, remain something we’re tracking carefully, alongside broader inflation expectations through swaps. But for the immediate few weeks, the short-term rate expectations and cross-currency pricing seem tightly tethered to the quality and direction of this week’s domestic data. Positioning should remain nimble, with strategies prepared for quick reversals, particularly in the face of headline-sensitive flows.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

According to BOE policymaker Clare Lombardelli, the current policy remains restrictive. She noted that wage growth remains elevated, which is a concern for achieving target inflation.

Lombardelli emphasised that wages are her primary focus when assessing disinflation potential. With recent progress in gradual disinflation and trade developments, a 25 basis points rate cut was deemed suitable.

Cautious Shift In Thinking

Lombardelli has highlighted what can be seen as a cautious shift in thinking within the Monetary Policy Committee. Her attention to wage trends suggests that income growth, despite signs of softening in other areas, still poses a possible challenge to bringing inflation back toward target. The idea here is that if people continue to secure higher pay, that often leads to greater spending, which in turn can keep prices moving upwards, even if supply chains and other cost factors have improved.

From our perspective, it’s apparent that the decision to vote for a relatively modest cut in rates points to a desire not to ease policy too quickly. A 25 basis points reduction reflects a nod to recent improvements, such as steadier pricing in goods and services, while still acknowledging that inflation persistently clings to areas affected by domestic factors, mainly wages.

The underlying message isn’t hard to interpret. Even though inflation data has started to cool off, expectations—particularly in services and negotiated pay—have not fallen in lockstep. That disconnect invites a more conservative pace to rate changes. What matters most here isn’t the headline inflation print, but what’s driving it under the surface. When pay packets continue outpacing productivity or demand remains persistent in wage-sensitive sectors, the disinflation process risks losing momentum.

Market Expectations And Policy Indications

As people analysing market expectations, we should notice that rate-sensitive instruments may begin to embed a more drawn-out easing cycle. Not just in terms of timing, but also in size. The policy stance described as ‘restrictive’ tells us it’s still above neutral—intended to dampen demand carefully rather than encourage it outright. So, forward pricing needs to take into account the priority the Committee places on seeing clearer evidence that wage pressures are cooling materially. Otherwise, the appetite for additional reductions stays restrained.

Bailey’s earlier remarks have already hinted at this balancing act. While broad inflation progress has justified a reassessment, caution colours the tone of most recent speeches. That tendency to lean on services inflation and pay growth as evidence that the job isn’t done yet now finds expression in the committee split.

Dislocation between market expectations and policymakers’ actual signals is where opportunity—and risk—sits. If swaps, for example, start betting on deeper cuts within a shorter horizon, it reflects a bet that the Bank has confidence inflation will retreat more rapidly. However, the weight policymakers are placing on pay dynamics may delay such anticipation from being fulfilled. That’s relevant now, as traders start to look beyond summer.

Sentiment can turn swiftly around the release of wage and price data. But the shift in voting pattern this month gives us a subtle sign—members are willing to adjust if conditions allow, yet not until underlying drivers come into better alignment. Inflation metrics without pay metrics no longer suffice as forward guidance indicators.

Current yields might already be moving to price in this change of communication stance. The next weeks will likely feed off incremental data trends—labour market releases, unit labour costs, and updated inflation figures. Those are now the core input variables that may tilt the rate expectation scale one way or the other. The more evidence we see of tighter labour slack easing, faster than anticipated, the more room we’ll likely price in.

Interpreting this shift requires attention to both data flow and the policy reaction function it invites. The leeway for the Bank to loosen further remains contingent more on wage moderation than on broader disinflation alone. That nuance may catch out shorter-tenor instruments if expectations run too far ahead of reality.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

USD/CNH continues to face challenges after not surpassing the 50-DMA level. The pair could encounter further downside pressures if the support at 7.18 fails to hold.

Recent market actions saw USD/CNH drop below March’s lows, leading to a pullback towards the 7.18 level. Although there was a short-term recovery, the pair has not overtaken the resistance at 7.27/7.28.

Potential Decline and Target Levels

If the pair’s brief uptick halts near this resistance, a further decline might occur. Should the 7.18 support level break, potential targets include 7.14 and the 7.11/7.10 range.

This information contains forward-looking statements, presenting potential risks and uncertainties. The data is for informational purposes and is not a recommendation to engage in market actions. Comprehensive research is advised before making any investment decisions.

All market engagements involve high risk and may result in a total loss of principal. The author of this article holds no positions in any mentioned stocks and does not have business ties with any companies referenced. Compensation for this article comes solely from the publishing platform.

Market Observations and Technical Levels

The recent downward movement in USD/CNH has raised eyebrows, particularly as the pair failed once again to push through the 50-day moving average. This technical level has acted like a ceiling for several weeks, and the inability to clear it doesn’t inspire confidence for those on the upside. The drop beneath the March lows wasn’t unexpected, but it does confirm a near-term loss of momentum. After sliding down to test the 7.18 level—a level we’ve been watching closely—the market did attempt to bounce.

That rebound, although modest, came up short before striking the overhead resistance clustered around 7.27 to 7.28. This resistance band lines up not just with prior peaks, but also with a compressed price zone that has stalled progress throughout April. The price appears to be consolidating just under that, which—in the shorter term—adds weight to further retracement, particularly if bullish sentiment continues to fade.

Now, if we shift focus towards the 7.18 area again, it’s clear this level acts as a pivot. Should it give way under increasing selling pressure, the first obvious support falls to the 7.14 mark. However, we would not rule out fresh testing in the 7.11 to 7.10 range. These were levels previously established late last year and remain in line with the lower boundary of the broader medium-term trading range. We believe many participants will be closely watching these levels for signs of stabilisation or fresh momentum indicators.

Derivative traders particularly should be attentive to intraday volatility spikes here. A slow grind lower might appear controlled on spot markets but can cause sharp dislocations in price settings across option strikes or short-dated futures contracts. Should 7.18 unravel, delta hedging activity may need to be recalibrated quickly. Put spreads around the 7.14 area might gain greater interest in this backdrop and could benefit from rising implied volatility.

Technicals aside, any further resilience above 7.18 will likely depend on local macro momentum and—more pressingly—US data surprises that affect broader dollar demand. Davis, who has tracked this pair closely, pointed out that external demand for CNH hasn’t returned in size, and until that narrative shifts, rallies in the pair are likely to be sold into. His view echoes what we’ve seen in positioning data this week, where speculative longs trimmed sharply.

That said, a short squeeze remains a real possibility if option expiries around the 7.25 mark are pinned and there’s no material follow-through lower. Some implied vol floors may also be tested. For those of us managing gamma exposure during event weeks, standing too long in either direction at this stage could prove expensive. It’s also worth tracking hedge fund flow, which in recent sessions has tilted more defensively, signifying a move back to risk-neutral positions.

Overall, reactive positioning and disciplined risk parameters should take precedence. The area between 7.27 and 7.28 remains an upper-tier defence zone—but cracks below 7.18 will likely gather momentum quickly, particularly if macro data disappoints or liquidity thins.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The recent trend in interest rate expectations may be inaccurate. The announcement between the US and China exceeded global expectations and could lead to improved global growth forecasts.

Businesses have been cautious due to tariff uncertainty, which has hindered economic activity. With positive resolutions, this activity may increase swiftly, potentially affecting inflation and necessitating a cautious Federal Reserve approach.

Interest Rate Expectations

The Fed is likely to deliver at least one rate cut by 2025, although earlier expectations had suggested up to five cuts. Market sentiment has shifted to anticipate two rate cuts, totalling 55 basis points, reflecting a change since last month.

Economic developments following recent announcements will determine the actual number of rate cuts. In the short term, the US Dollar is expected to strengthen as a result of interest rate adjustments, but a renewed focus on global growth may influence its value.

What we have here is a picture that challenges the prevailing market assumptions about the direction of interest rates in the United States. The initial optimism surrounding multiple rate cuts has faded, replaced by a more measured view. Traders were expecting the Federal Reserve to ease policy more aggressively this year — potentially with five distinct rate reductions. That has now moderated, and investors are adjusting to the idea of perhaps only two rate cuts before the end of next year. A shift of this magnitude doesn’t happen by accident; it reflects changed thinking about where global growth, inflation, and policy are all headed.

Global Economic Changes

Part of this change in interpretation stems directly from an announcement made between the United States and China — an announcement which outstripped what most had pencilled in. The breakthrough has removed one of the heavier weights on trade, likely freeing firms to move ahead with investments they had shelved out of uncertainty. That hesitation on the part of businesses had limited hiring, reduced purchasing, and generally suppressed economic momentum. Without that drag, there’s every possibility of a quick rebound in activity. Such a rebound wouldn’t be invisible at the central bank — it would almost certainly feed into consumer prices and complicate attempts to ease.

Powell now finds himself needing to balance several competing influences, with inflation still sticky in several components. A rapid return of pent-up demand, particularly in industrial activity and logistics, would not go unnoticed. And while the longer-term view still suggests some room to cut later, the near term might reveal tighter conditions. This helps explain why the U.S. Dollar has found fresh strength — even while the broader discussion remains one of eventual rate reductions.

As position holders, we must now reassess how short-term rates will behave in parallel with broader growth expectations. Front-end Treasury contracts have already begun to price in the pullback in cuts, especially beyond the summer. The two-year yield, for example, has responded accordingly as traders lower the odds of aggressive policy loosening. For those with exposure to spreads or options structures, it becomes necessary to recalibrate to reflect this shift — not blindly, but based firmly on underlying data.

Yellen’s department will likely be watching the downstream effects of increased commercial activity — especially cross-border — as it could put upward pressure on commodities, complicating inflation further. The strength of the greenback, while supportive of lower import costs, might be offset by renewed input demand globally. Accordingly, implied volatility in currency options tied to the U.S. unit remains elevated, particularly in shorter-dated contracts.

In eurodollar and SOFR futures, open interest has shown some repositioning after last week’s statements. There’s an observable preference for mid-curve hedges, implying less conviction around immediate central bank action but growing uncertainty about late-year moves. We are seeing more structured positions emerge — not out of speculation, but because managers need protection if this direction veers unexpectedly once again.

It’s worth highlighting that much of the narrowing in policy expectations has come not from less concern over inflation, but from increased belief in how quickly pent-up demand could resurface. The feedback loop from trade to hiring to spending and back into prices is quick and at times underestimated. Even marginal changes in PMI data or input costs could help or hinder the present outlook.

When reading these developments, traders need to stay responsive. Being early is not the same as being correct, especially when timing rate exposure. Matching temporality with precision is not easy. Now more than ever, it’s sensible to maintain optionality — not necessarily because volatility is predicted, but because the chance of being wrong has increased. The pricing in swing points between September and January is already becoming tighter than any time this year — and that matters a great deal.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The GBP/USD currency pair is experiencing downward pressure, trading at its lowest since mid-April, below 1.3200. The US Dollar’s strength is due to positive sentiment and economic developments, making it difficult for the GBP/USD to recover soon.

On Monday, the USD saw gains, with the USD Index rising over 1% to surpass 101.50, indicating stronger performance against major currencies. The GBP also erased weekly gains as the pair broke below the key 1.3290 support level.

Us China Trade Developments

Recent developments between the US and China, including a 90-day trade truce and reduced tariffs, have bolstered the US Dollar. The pair dropped to the 1.3140 zone amid this strengthened US Dollar, affecting markets and risk sentiment.

This general market commentary contains forward-looking statements, involving risks and uncertainties associated with currency trading. Prospective traders should perform their own research before making any financial decisions, considering that high leverage in foreign exchange poses risks, potentially leading to partial or total investment loss.

From a structural point of view, the sustained decline beneath 1.3290 now sets a tone of vulnerability for the pound over the coming sessions. The break below what many had marked as a psychological floor has likely triggered a reassessment among short-term position holders. With momentum now firmly skewed to the downside, we observe little appetite from buyers stepping in on the dip, at least for now.

Looking back, the bounce seen earlier this month now appears to have been retracement rather than reversal. The ongoing selloff aligns with what we’ve seen in broader dollar strength, supported sharply by firmer expectations around economic prospects across the Atlantic. The strength of the greenback, measured here through the USD Index pushing past 101.50, continues to signal broad confidence in the trajectory of US policy and data releases. The pace of gains on Monday—just above a percent in one session—adds weight to the case for more pronounced support under the dollar in the near term.

Geopolitical Influence And Market Reaction

We’ve also watched shifts in geopolitical tone—particularly between Washington and Beijing—apply steady directional influence on risk currencies. With the temporary easing of friction via a trade truce and planned tariff reversals, markets are finding reasons to hold dollars, and to reduce exposure to perceived riskier assets. The pound’s subsequent drift towards the 1.3140 region shows markets are neither relieved by headlines nor convinced there’s safety in sitting long GBP right now.

In this type of movement, volatility often creeps in unpredictably, with measured recoveries often failing to hold. Leverage—where small price shifts are exaggerated on margin—magnifies positioning risk, so we continue to monitor how global institutions rebalance exposures. With this in mind, near-term attempts to reclaim higher territory on GBP/USD will likely meet resistance unless the prevailing dollar strength unwinds or an incoming UK-specific catalyst shifts current sentiment—neither of which appears likely in the immediate window.

Technical setups currently favour trend continuation, especially while the pair remains below broken support zones that previously held for several sessions. From a momentum lens, this is more than a temporary drop; markets have repriced conditions multiple times in recent days, with sharp directional reactions to even modest US news flow.

Price action has remained methodical: stair-stepping lower, rather than collapsing in panic. That pattern often indicates deliberate positioning, not short-term reaction. For those of us tracking this market daily, the immediate question becomes whether reactive low bids between 1.3120 and 1.3140 can form a meaningful base, or whether this is simply a pause in a broader drift lower.

Traders engaged in derivatives must monitor margin sustainability in these conditions. Movements of this size can shift margin requirements intraday. This, paired with macro-driven sentiment and reduced demand for pound exposure, results in layered risk expressions across futures chains and options markets. There’s also the matter of volatility spikes leading to pricing inefficiency near expiry cuts.

Hence, directional bets must contend with headwinds from both pricing pressure and positioning crowd dynamics. Pullbacks from oversold regions are always possible, especially around round figures and historical technical supports, so we’re watching for any deceleration in selling pressure. But without a change in either data flow or broader investor comfort, the weight continues to favour the downside.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.