The Canadian dollar is remaining stable against the US dollar as it enters Thursday’s North American session, yet it is under pressure due to lower oil prices linked to prospects of a US/Iran agreement. The currency faces challenges from both reduced oil prices and broader yield spreads, which are impacting its performance.

The fair value estimate for USD/CAD has risen and stands at 1.3892. Domestic factors affecting the CAD include the release of housing starts, manufacturing sales, and existing home sales data. However, overall market trends, and significant events like Powell and US data releases, may have a larger influence.

Usd Cad Resistance Levels

The USD/CAD reached notable resistance levels above 1.4000 earlier in the week. Despite this, the currency pair’s double top formation and the resistance encountered could point to a renewed push beyond 1.4000. The midpoint of the September to February range at approximately 1.4100 remains a key level, with near-term support defined at around 1.3920.

It is crucial to remember that the information contains forward-looking statements with inherent risks. Thorough research is advised before any financial decisions, acknowledging the potential risks and losses involved in market investments.

With the Canadian dollar tethered near familiar ranges, it remains vulnerable to downside pressures stemming from broader external forces. The link between commodity-driven currencies and oil remains robust, and as crude benchmarks soften on improving geopolitical dialogues, the pressure on CAD becomes more pronounced. Lower energy prices typically sap momentum from the loonie, and this effect isn’t being offset by countervailing domestic data so far.

The recent bump in the fair value estimate for USD/CAD to 1.3892 adds weight to bullish positions favouring continued strength in the greenback. While short-term data prints from Canada—housing starts, manufacturing trends, and real-estate figures—do set the tone for internal market sentiment, they’re unlikely to counterbalance the deeper macro drivers influencing currency behaviour at present.

Watch Key Support Levels

Resistance tested around 1.4000 earlier in the week hasn’t resulted in any decisive reversal, and traders should take note of the double top pattern that emerged. While typically a trend-reversal signal, this structure has not been accompanied by follow-through selling or deterioration in USD momentum. Instead, the price action continues to consolidate just below those levels, keeping the potential for a re-test alive—particularly with the 1.4100 zone standing out as a decisive technical marker. That midpoint of the past multi-month range is drawing speculative interest, as it may act as a magnet for price action in case of further US strength.

On the other side of the range, support around 1.3920 defines the first layer of defence for CAD bulls, with any clean break beneath it likely weakening momentum and raising the probability of a broader retracement. Watching this zone closely is prudent, especially ahead of upcoming economic updates from Washington. Market reaction to Powell’s commentary and key data releases there have the capacity to sharply alter sentiment.

Expect faster intraday flows and more aggressive positioning around these levels as macro volatility increases. We’re keeping an eye on short-term correlation breaks, particularly between USD/CAD and WTI pricing. When typical relationships start to diverge, risk-adjusted positioning must be adapted swiftly.

As with all analysis involving predictive elements, one must approach with measured caution. The data informs our strategies, but the price action affirms them. Maintaining a process driven by discipline, instead of reacting to headlines, is what will define performance over the next few sessions.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The German finance minister emphasised the need for the EU to respond with unity and determination to US tariffs. He indicated that while negotiations aim for a positive outcome, Europe is ready to take action if talks fail.

There has been little progress in negotiations between the EU and the US, with the US favouring its close allies such as the UK, Japan, India, and South Korea. China, despite previous retaliations, received the same treatment with a 10% baseline tariff after entering discussions, leaving other countries to endure imposed tariffs with limited options.

Early Warning Signs

What the existing content lays bare is a gathering consequence for economic instruments sensitive to cross-border friction—things more prone to respond early to shifts in global trading conditions. With the German minister’s remarks, there’s a clear suggestion that patience with negotiation will not extend indefinitely. When someone as prominent as Lindner begins to speak openly about the possibility of action, you can infer an increased likelihood of structured response measures—not merely talk, but backed intent.

In practical terms, we interpret this tone as an early warning. Not of wild policy moves, but of preparation for realignment. While some key US allies have been offered softer edges in the ongoing tariff decisions, the EU seems caught in a wait-and-see holding pattern, while watching others granted exceptions. Markets tend to anticipate such divergences before they formally set in, and that’s where positions begin to shift.

In a narrower sense, volatility around interest-rate correspondences and regional indices may not wait for policy announcements. Moves in instruments tied to European equity indices or sector-specific exposures—especially those dealing with cross-border manufacturing—could widen sooner than expected. These are often how sentiment prices itself in when formal change is near but not yet final.

We’ve seen this happen before, where regional bloc responses begin softly, often through soft signalling. Then follow matters like adjusted procurement rules or sector compliance requirements that, though administrative in nature, quickly feed into risk premiums.

Retaliatory Measures and Market Reactions

It’s also worth noting the experience of countries like China, seemingly met with baseline tariffs despite earlier retaliations—demonstrates how negotiation at high levels is no guarantee of relief. That distinct lack of carve-out treatment has useful parallels. From that, we take the hint that EU leaders may not tolerate uneven policy treatment for much longer. Preparatory hedging is more than just a theoretical exercise.

Quiet alignment is often the calm before policy statements and coded retaliation. For us, that means hedged exposure toward European industrials—especially those reliant on non-EU demand—and watching volatility tick up around sectors like autos, metals, or capital goods.

Activity will likely concentrate on the spread between European and US benchmarks. If the EU does announce retaliatory measures, we’d expect immediate pressure on relative valuations rather than deep economic rewrites—it’s the comparative short-term reaction that tends to move most. And we can’t ignore the possibility of options activity picking up around eurozone clusters that are seen as most exposed.

Keep an eye on spreads—not because the macro numbers are deteriorating yet, but because a prepared policy response has a tendency to shift perceived balance. When there’s less ambiguity about action versus delay, the shift toward re-pricing can happen fast. Structured products may reflect this tightening, even if broader equity gauges stay muted at first.

Formally, the minister’s language was measured. But markets hear more in tone than in full sentences. We’ve picked up enough in this to assume that the region’s larger economies may grow tired of offering up clemency or patience. And when they choose to act, it usually comes with a defined framework. That’s when forward positioning matters most.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

EUR/USD has declined below 1.12 after a report contributed to the USD regaining some strength. Despite this rebound, confidence in the USD remains low ahead of important US data releases.

A negative risk premium still affects the USD, which is trading away from its fundamentals. The focus is on important upcoming US data, such as April retail sales and PPI.

Trading Involves Risk

Changes in tariffs, alongside current aggregate USD positions, could lead to further depreciation of the USD. There are risks and uncertainties involved in forward-looking statements related to markets and instruments.

Trading involves risk and can result in the loss of investments. Thorough research is necessary before making investment decisions. The information provided should not be seen as a buy or sell recommendation.

Put simply, the euro has slipped below 1.12 against the dollar, largely due to a bounce in the latter that followed the release of new data. The uptick didn’t come out of nowhere; it was tied directly to a piece of economic reporting that painted a slightly firmer picture for the greenback. That said, broad belief in the dollar’s strength isn’t exactly back in full swing. The pricing of the currency still reflects worry, with investors assigning it a bit of a risk discount — not something you see when everything looks healthy.

We can infer that sentiment towards the dollar, while lifted momentarily, remains shaky at best as we move into another stretch of data-heavy sessions. All eyes are turning to figures on April retail sales and producer prices. These are not just minor details — they’re likely to directly impact upcoming expectations around inflation and growth. If either report reveals anything out of line with previous assumptions, positioning will shift — most likely fast.

Potential Impact Of Tariffs

Now consider the tariff adjustments. Trade policy changes are never isolated events. They tend to knock through the currency space in ways that aren’t always straightforward at first glance. Alongside current positioning in the dollar — which appears stretched based on aggregate data — shifts in trade terms could set the stage for another leg lower in the currency. We must be careful here not to rely solely on past behaviour or historical ranges. The market does not forgive short-sightedness.

From where we sit, the dollar doesn’t look comfortably valued when stacked against its own metrics. Much of its recent move can arguably be traced more to opportunity than to genuine strength. The fact that it’s drifting rather noticeably from fundamentals is telling — and not the kind of thing we typically dismiss lightly. Imbalances in momentum versus value can take time to correct, but they tend not to resolve gently.

What this means in practice, especially for those tracking options or futures, is that volatility premiums could begin readjusting soon. The pendulum may swing faster than expected. That’s especially true if retail or producer data come in hot. In those cases, price action will probably magnify as liquidation flows meet recalibrations of macro assumptions.

Because of that, there’s not much room for complacency. Traders ought not to treat the current drift in euro-dollar as noise. When we see dislocations between price action and underlying conditions, what often follows is increased two-way movement and sharper corrections. That’s the environment we may be rolling into next.

It’s also worth remembering that current leverage across FX derivatives is not negligible. That creates fragility. If one or two key prints differ markedly from forecasts, we could see forced position unwinds. The setup suggests heightened sensitivity is coming back into the system — not really ideal if you’re running anything unhedged.

All of this doesn’t imply directional bias; it suggests alertness and a better handle on short-term risks. Derivatives aren’t slow to react. As collective exposure builds up in one direction, disconfirmation can have fast results.

So it stands to reason that in the coming trading windows, loss tolerances should be reassessed. Position sizes may need refinement based on current volatility and event risk. The path ahead is noisy, and that’s exactly the type of condition where mechanics take over from narrative. Better to tighten strategy now, than react on the wrong side of a move later.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

In April, Switzerland saw a 0.1% increase in producer and import prices, maintaining the same monthly growth rate as before. Producer prices alone rose by 0.2%, while import prices remained unchanged.

When compared to April of the previous year, the overall index experienced a 0.5% decrease. This decline is mainly driven by a 1.8% drop in import prices.

Stability In Factory Gate Inflation

This data shows the relatively stable nature of factory gate inflation in Switzerland. While producer prices edged higher for the second month in a row, it is the flat reading in imported goods that stands out against the broader downward pull over the past 12 months. What we’re seeing is a cost environment that’s not entirely deflationary, yet does not suggest broad upward pressure either—not at the headline level.

The year-on-year decrease in the total index reflects how import pricing continues to soften. A 1.8% decline is not small enough to ignore, nor strong enough to indicate collapsing demand. It’s more reflective of subdued external pressures, perhaps owing to currency effects or simply tepid demand for foreign goods. After all, Swiss manufacturing draws heavily from imported materials, so this change in cost structures should feed through to pricing decisions with only a modest lag.

For those of us tracking short-dated pricing activity, this adds an important piece to the puzzle. It supports the view that external inflation pressures are receding at a steady pace rather than falling off a cliff. Derivative exposures tied to producer or input costs should price in ongoing disinflation across imported components, particularly over the summer. This framework aligns with what Müller mentioned last week about controlled raw material flows and cautious inventory building across machinery and chemical production.

What’s not directly visible from the headline numbers, but relevant nonetheless, is the separation between domestic inputs and global sourcing. We can infer from the 0.2% uptick in locally produced goods that pricing power is not entirely absent within the country. However, this gain has not yet overwhelmed the broader softness from abroad—which matters.

Strategies For Short Tenor Cost Spreads

Given this split, short-tenor strategies on cost spreads may benefit from weighing more heavily on domestic demand recovery options. Pricing biases over June and July may lean mildly upward for local producers, but with foreign input costs remaining soft, spreads could stay favourable over the near term. This could also provide a slight lift to hedged instruments tied to finished good margins.

Expectations for sustained producer price inflation look overstated at this point, particularly if import prices repeat another month at or below current levels. We should model for steady inputs, with downside adjustment risk towards autumn should energy or shipping see unexpected movements.

In practice, the differential between local cost rises and static foreign input values is narrowing to ranges that don’t command premium risk adjustments. That means a tighter focus on sector routing, particularly across industrial firms with global exposure, would make sense. The signals now support short-term positioning that leans defensive against headline volatility, while still framing for targeted long bias in Swiss-manufactured exposure. That’s especially true for firms less dependent on volatile commodity imports.

As always, we remain aware of base effect rotation. Last year’s imported pricing surge only began to retreat late in spring, which will distort May’s annual print in the other direction. That creates a high potential for optical tightening in year-on-year comparisons, though the net process underneath should remain benign.

We continue to prefer instrument structures that offer defined downside buffers while exploiting this mild firmness in domestic production values. One-month forward positions still benefit from the gap that’s opened between real input softness and manufacturers’ measured pass-through.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The dollar’s value is slightly decreasing against major currencies following events in April. US Treasuries have not regained much ground when evaluated against risk-free SOFR swap rates or German bunds.

There is now a negative correlation between USD/JPY and US Treasury yields, a shift from the typically positive relationship. Evidence is building for currency diversification, indicated by April data from the Japanese Ministry of Finance showing foreign purchases of Japanese equities and long-term debt at record levels since 2005.

Impact Of Us Retail Sales

US April retail sales data, expected to remain flat after March’s increase, could impact the dollar’s movement. Fed Chair Jay Powell’s comments, along with long-term inflation expectations rising to 2.5% from 2.3%, might maintain his neutral stance as the market anticipates only 50 basis points in Fed rate cuts this year.

The US Dollar Index (DXY) is anticipated to stay weak, with short-term support levels at 100.20/25. Without a dramatic increase in retail sales figures, further declines could undo gains of the past three weeks.

What we’re observing here is a gradual weakening of the dollar, a move that’s been slower than dramatic but meaningful nonetheless when measured across key global currencies. This softening follows April’s data releases and a shift in market tone, where some of the usual relationships—like the positive connection between the dollar and US Treasury yields—are now behaving quite differently.

To elaborate, USD/JPY has historically tended to rise with yields, as higher returns on Treasuries generally lure investment flows into US assets. That behaviour has now flipped. Japanese purchases of both domestic equities and long-term bonds surged to levels not seen since 2005, suggesting that even as rates might still favour the United States, appetite is shifting toward local opportunities in Asia. From our perspective, this is a telling change in capital flows, which may not correct in the very near-term.

Trend In Currency Exposure

These inflows into Japan likely reflect a larger trend: international participants spreading currency exposure more actively. Admittedly, this pivot may be due to more than just yields—regulatory moves and renewed optimism in Asia-based growth stories could also be in play—but the bond and equity data from Tokyo speak volumes on their own.

Meanwhile, US retail sales for April are projected to flatline. That follows a stronger print in March. If consumers are indeed pulling back, even modestly, it would suggest that household demand may be slowing—a point not lost on the market as it eyes inflation pathways and employment metrics. Without clear confirmation of resiliency here, that alone may reinforce the cautious tone from Powell last week.

His comments, while not forceful in either direction, come at a time when inflation expectations have started creeping higher again. The five-year outlook drifting from 2.3% to 2.5% tees up an interesting dilemma. While rate cuts are still priced into futures markets—around 50 basis points this year—the Fed chair seems unwilling to rush policy decisions in response to only partial data. Fair judgement, though it does anchor the dollar in a less attractive light for now.

The DXY remains under pressure, still hovering around the 100.20/25 short-term support band. Here, the absence of any meaningful upward momentum in consumer spending could act as a catalyst for another leg lower. Any move beneath that level risks unwinding not just the recent three weeks of gains, but possibly seeding broader USD weakness if technicals worsen.

From our standpoint, this gives traders in rate-sensitive products or volatility assets a clear backdrop. Short-term setups should be approached with more caution, but not inactivity. Focus on levels that hold, rather than chasing retracements based on stale correlations. Pay attention to global bond demand signals, as they now say more about money flow than domestic figures alone. And any deviation in CPI or employment prints could trigger re-pricing across multiple points on the rates curve.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Germany’s wholesale price index for April showed a decrease of 0.1% from the previous month. This is a slight improvement over the earlier recorded drop of 0.2%.

Year On Year Comparison

Although there was a monthly decline, wholesale prices are currently 0.8% higher compared to April of the previous year. This indicates a year-on-year increase in wholesale prices despite the monthly fluctuation.

What we can gather from the April wholesale price data out of Germany is a picture of subdued month-on-month movement, set against the backdrop of an overall upward yearly shift. The small 0.1% drop from March to April hints at a momentary easing in price pressures at the wholesale level, though it should not be taken as a complete reversal of broader pricing trends. The 0.8% increase compared to the same month last year confirms that pricing momentum remains intact, even if inconsistent on shorter time frames.

For those navigating price exposure, this should compel more careful monitoring of industrial inputs and producer chains. The annual rise, even if modest, points to persistent cost growth in goods traded among wholesalers – an area often responsive to shifts in energy costs, raw materials, and general supply-demand mismatches. A pattern of alternating minor drops and gains over recent months may suggest stability on the surface, but it’s likely concealing more unpredictable undercurrents when tracked at a more granular level.

Earlier in February and March, when larger declines were observed, considerable weight was placed on mild winter effects and relative stagnation in construction demand. However, April’s narrowing downturn implies that some of the disinflationary effects could be tapering off. If this slowing pace of decline continues into May and beyond, we could see pricing start to level or even bounce.

Macro Cost Direction

Müller’s last statements reinforced the need to separate month-on-month disruption from macro cost direction, especially at times when base effects distort the headline trend. Reading too much into temporary relief can come with risk – not least in sectors where forward contracts hinge on guesswork around layered inflation data.

For now, expected volatility in auction yields across euro area bonds may begin to price in more upstream supply risk, depending on whether May’s wholesaler figures confirm this moderation or not. The decisions we make in the weeks ahead should give more weight to the broader annual trend — an upward climb, if only a mild one — than to a single negative monthly line.

We should not discount the behaviours in peripheral indicators either. Freight indices, import costs, and intermediate goods inventories will add clarity as May progresses. Sharp-eyed analysts will want to keep spreads tight across different time expiry layers, particularly in June contracts aimed near manufacturing sectors. Spread compression strategies, if executed without delay, may help offset extended exposure to short-term pricing reversals.

Schneider’s earlier comments on supply buffers should not go overlooked, especially given how quickly inventory build-up can swing back into play. If warehousing pressures return, and if movement patterns across European ports continue to normalise, we could see restocking kick up by early summer — another factor likely to feed back into the next quarterly numbers.

Right now, it makes sense to scale back high-beta positions in sectors with strong wholesale cost sensitivity unless matched by real pricing power at the consumer level. Any data surprise in June, especially from transport and machinery intermediates, could lead to sharp recalibrations in curve steepness.

Preservation of margin remains the core theme. So we’ve taken note: directional positions should be anchored in medium-horizon pricing assumptions, avoiding noise from minor swings, and instead focusing on longer patterns in upstream costs that tell more about where things are actually headed.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Gold prices experienced a modest bounce from the $3,120 area, the lowest since April 10, due to improving global risk sentiment and a slight dip in the US Dollar. However, a substantial recovery remains unlikely due to optimism from the de-escalation of the US-China trade war.

Traders have reduced expectations for aggressive Federal Reserve policy easing as recession fears ease, leading to higher US Treasury yields, supporting the US Dollar and limiting Gold’s gains. The US Producer Price Index and Jerome Powell’s speech are anticipated for further direction on gold trades.

Gold Demand Dynamics

Though demand for Gold increases as a safe haven, optimism in US-Iran and US-China negotiations pressures Gold prices to one-month lows. Market participants now foresee a 50 basis points Fed rate cut this year, down from a full point previously expected, boosting 10-year US Treasury yields.

The technical outlook indicates a bearish trend after breaking below $3,200 and further Fibonacci retracement support, with potential for a decline toward $3,100. Resistance exists near $3,168-3,170, with further movement above $3,230 possibly triggering short-covering, pushing Gold toward $3,300.

Gold has been attempting to stabilise after dipping to $3,120—the weakest showing in over a month—though any sustained rally looks faint for now. That bounce, while notable on the hourly chart, came mostly on the back of softer US Dollar demand and reduced anxiety in broader financial markets. What underpinned that lighter mood was improved rhetoric around international negotiations, particularly between Washington and Beijing. The detente has cooled fears of deeper tariff disputes, which has naturally drained some of the demand from safe-haven assets like bullion.

From our view, the shift in expectations around central bank decision-making also plays a large role here. Traders now seem less convinced the Federal Reserve will move quickly on policy loosening. At one point, a full percentage point reduction was priced in for this year. Now, markets are adjusting to the idea of just 50 basis points—and that makes a considerable difference. It’s not just about the rate cuts themselves; the effect runs through bond markets, pushing up yields, which in turn offers more attractive returns in US-dollar denominated assets compared to non-yielding ones like gold.

Market Influences and Technical Indicators

It’s against this backdrop that we’ve seen 10-year Treasury yields touch higher levels again. This steady climb keeps a bid under the Dollar, which acts as a headwind for any asset priced in it. So far, that correlation has held quite well. Less need for financial protection, higher yields, and a bolstered greenback—all working in tandem to flatten the enthusiasm we might usually see for precious metals in uncertain times.

There’s also the matter of the data calendar. With the Producer Price Index due shortly, and the Federal Reserve Chair set to make remarks, we’re looking at possible market reshuffles. It’s not likely to overturn the bigger trend, but either surprise in inflation metrics or a shift in tone from Powell could realign rate cut timelines yet again. That’s where volatility may re-enter.

Technically, the bias still leans downward. The break under the $3,200 level and loss of support through the Fibonacci pivot points opened room for prices to test lower ranges. We would watch $3,100 with interest; it’s a round number and psychologically relevant. If sellers continue to press, there aren’t many firm levels between there and the next consolidation zones.

Any lift from here, particularly through the $3,168 to $3,170 region, could draw some of the shorter positions out of the market, triggering what’s effectively a short squeeze. If that occurs, we might see a run toward $3,300—but that route looks unlikely without broader catalyst support. Buyers would need not just technical momentum but also macro backing, perhaps in the form of renewed geopolitical flare-ups or reversal signals from the US central bank.

For active traders, managing exposure to directional bets in metals will rely not just on headline flows but underlying rate dynamics and bond performance as well. The clearer those signals become, the more likely we can lean into setups with confidence.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The UK economy grew by 0.2% in March, surpassing the expected 0.0% growth, according to data from the Office for National Statistics as of 15 May 2025. This follows a prior increase of 0.5% in February.

Sector Performance Overview

Service sector growth reached 0.4%, above the anticipated 0.1%, with a previous rise of 0.3%. Industrial output fell by 0.7%, more than the predicted 0.5% decline, yet faced an earlier increase revised from 1.5% to 1.7%.

Manufacturing output dropped by 0.8%, exceeding the expected 0.5% decrease, following a previous increase revised from 2.2% to 2.4%. Conversely, construction output grew by 0.5%, outpacing the forecasted 0.1% rise, with a prior increase revised from 0.4% to 0.2%.

This monthly data positively influences perceptions of the UK economy’s first-quarter performance, with the quarterly report reflecting these improved estimates. The figures provide insight into economic trends across key sectors such as services, industry, and construction.

What the data tells us is that the UK economy has performed slightly better than many had forecast. A 0.2% monthly rise in March, although modest, came as a welcome surprise compared to the flat reading markets had been preparing for. When taken together with February’s upwardly revised growth of 0.5%, the picture becomes more supportive of a recovery that hadn’t fully been priced in at the start of the second quarter. That’s meaningful in our world, particularly when we consider expectations were more muted heading into this data release.

The services sector continues to carry most of the forward momentum. With output climbing by 0.4%—well ahead of forecasts—it’s clear that consumer-facing industries have held up strongly. Part of this strength is due to ongoing resilience in real household incomes and stronger-than-expected retail activity in early spring. Meanwhile, industrial production and manufacturing displayed sharper contractions than hoped, with the latter sliding by 0.8%. That sort of drop tells us demand for goods may still be lagging post-pandemic highs. Supply chains are no longer the bottleneck they once were, so the softness is less from disrupted inputs and more likely a function of cooling output demand at home or abroad.

Construction Activity and Future Considerations

Interestingly, while manufacturing has retreated, the construction sector posted better figures. A 0.5% monthly rise, against what was actually quite a tepid forecast, suggests that we’re seeing renewed activity in commercial and infrastructure projects. Housebuilding remains weighed down by elevated borrowing costs, yet higher public and private investment in large-scale developments likely explains the pick-up. That should be monitored carefully as it could inform broader patterns in fixed capital formation later this year.

Looking ahead, we’re not inclined to dismiss the slowing industrial output out of hand. Month-on-month readings in these segments often swing more heavily due to their volatile nature. But the deeper contraction than expected, after such a strong February, hints at the potential for more uneven contributions from industry in the near term. That’s especially relevant given how manufacturing makes up a smaller share of the economy but can materially shift short-term growth estimates when large moves are observed. It skews things at the margin.

The adjustments to previous months’ data—February’s industrial and manufacturing expansions revised up once again—also merit attention. They imply the economy had more momentum coming into March than originally captured. Revisions like these aren’t just cosmetic; they recalibrate our broader understanding of economic baselines. And for us, that alters how we approach short-duration rate-sensitive positions, as well as index futures pricing tied to GDP benchmarks.

Forward guidance becomes less certain when such divergences across sectors appear. With growth still supported largely by services and construction, but not industry, divergences in price action across asset classes tied to different sectors should begin to emerge. That’s not something to gloss over. During periods like this, movements in yield curves—particularly the front end—may decouple somewhat from macro sentiment if fixed asset weakness continues.

While quarter-on-quarter data will eventually smooth these monthly wobbles, the March figures introduce a level of directional clarity. At this stage, adjustments in macroeconomic models now lean toward upward revisions for Q1, which could bring forward shifts in expectations about interest rate decisions. The key thing is to model sectoral divergence rather than rely solely on the aggregated headline.

What needs consideration now is how consistent these service-driven gains will be through the second quarter, given how heavily they’ve supported the overall outturn so far. Weather and seasonal expenditure patterns could play a larger role than usual in next month’s prints, particularly in discretionary segments. That possibility should be factored in when adjusting for short-term expectations.

The higher-than-expected construction activity, though smaller in size, matters because it’s often a more reliable proxy for investment planning. For that reason, sensitivities in equity markets tied to engineering, materials, or logistics may still have more room to price in these subtle but persistent upside surprises. We should remain aware of how these softer indicators are feeding into real asset allocations.

Ultimately, while the headline GDP reading improved only modestly, the composition of the gains matters more. The structure is shifting. That tells us where elasticity lies in economic output—what is reacting, and what is not. And that’s the terrain we manoeuvre on.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Electrovaya Inc. reported quarterly earnings of $0.02 per share, falling short of the expected $0.03 per share. The company showed an improvement from a loss of $0.02 per share a year prior, with these figures adjusted for non-recurring items.

This quarter reflected an earnings surprise of -33.33%. Previously, the company delivered a surprise of 50% by posting a loss of $0.01 per share against an expected loss of $0.02.

Revenues for the quarter ended March 2025 stood at $15.02 million, missing expectations by 7.10%, compared to $10.7 million last year. Electrovaya has not surpassed consensus revenue estimates over the last four quarters.

Since the start of the year, Electrovaya’s shares have risen by about 11.3%, compared to the S&P 500’s 0.1% gain. The future movement of the stock largely depends on management’s commentary regarding earnings and other outlooks.

The current consensus EPS estimate is projected at $0.04 with revenues of $18.69 million for the next quarter. For the current fiscal year, expectations stand at $0.10 EPS on revenues of $66.68 million.

The Zacks Industry Rank places Electronics – Miscellaneous Products in the lower 38% of all industries. This industry’s position may influence Electrovaya’s stock performance.

The numbers show a mixed but not entirely negative picture. Electrovaya turned a previous loss into a small profit, reaching $0.02 per share versus a loss of $0.02 in the same quarter last year. That pivot is notable. Still, even with that improvement, the market had expected $0.03—so we’re looking at a downside surprise of just over 33%. Not ideal, but not catastrophic either, considering the broader trend of narrowing losses.

On the revenue side, they pulled in $15.02 million, which marks a decent year-on-year gain from $10.7 million. However, that figure still fell short of the expected $16.17 million, bringing a miss of 7.10%. It’s the fourth straight quarter revenues have missed consensus estimates, which, over time, chips away at confidence. That compounding effect needs to be factored into short-term modelling, as it increases sensitivity to forward guidance and sentiment-based movement.

The share price tells its own story—up 11.3% year-to-date while the S&P 500 barely nudged higher. This outperformance suggests market participants may be focusing more on the shift from net loss to profit than on shortfalls versus estimates. But we’ve seen that kind of reaction reverse sharply when forward guidance doesn’t support the optimism. With management yet to clarify the path ahead, much depends on how the next earnings call calibrates expectations.

Analyst consensus looks to the future with some optimism—a forecast of $0.04 per share and revenue of $18.69 million for the next quarter. For the full year, markets are leaning towards $0.10 EPS and revenues of $66.68 million. Notably, whether these upward estimates can stick will hinge on whether the company can show it has plugged the revenue miss problem. For now, accuracy is going to matter more than acceleration.

The Zacks Industry Rank positions the sector in the lower third, which doesn’t do the stock any favours. This isn’t just a statistic—it reflects a broader weakness across comparable names. When timing trades or planning exposure, keep in mind that sector underperformance often drags on even solid names. That downward pull isn’t always explained by company fundamentals alone.

We’re seeing some traders treat the 11.3% gain as an early sign of strength. But it would be premature to act as if that movement guarantees momentum from here. Short-dated options volumes are likely to pick up as we approach the next earnings window, especially if implied volatility remains subdued. Spreads may offer more controlled exposure than naked calls or puts, given how sentiment could flip based on management tone or macro pressures.

Best to keep directional bias in check at this point. Instead, look for engagement near earnings dates, and monitor positioning shifts that may reflect early large-institution hedging. Volatility is likely to remain event-driven rather than trend-based unless the company clearly beats both EPS and revenue next time around.

A meeting took place on the sidelines involving US trade representative, Jamieson Greer, and China’s trade envoy, Li Chenggang. Both were attending the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) conference.

No additional information has been provided about the discussion. Since it is described as a brief conversation, it may not yield substantial outcomes.

The Implications of the Exchange

That short exchange, though probably unintended to be the main event, offers a sliver of insight into how backchannel diplomacy may still function between the two largest economies on the planet. Greer and Li speaking, even briefly, tells us something—not through what was said, but that it happened at all. The fact it took place during APEC, a setting loaded with commercial focus rather than political theatre, adds weight to the implication. These moments are not fixed parts of protocol; they are rarely accidental.

What it suggests, to us, is that informal contact persists, despite headlines often telling another story. We typically see friction between Washington and Beijing being reported in layers of tariffs, export controls, and technology bans. But these quieter instances—hushed words rather than formal communiqués—may indicate that decision-makers haven’t entirely closed the door. They still prefer, where possible, to feel the temperature before acting.

For us, monitoring the subtle activity around these summits can help map the mood more accurately than statements crafted for public reaction. In markets where perception can shape price direction, undercurrents in diplomacy are not something to be brushed aside.

Market Implications

Now, what this means in the current context is fairly direct. While the conversation was short, the timing and positioning matter. Commodities and macro-sensitive contracts need to be viewed through the lens of broader policy signals—not just data points or quarterly output. A casual chat has the capacity to dent expectations around, say, stimulus negotiations or export restrictions which can shift pricing in commodity-linked contracts or currency hedging strategies.

This is why we cannot afford to focus only on headline moves. Thinly-veiled policy shifts and offhand remarks—especially in forums that fly under the radar—offer more clarity than one might assume. The next few weeks are not about chasing after new yield curves or recalculating based purely on CPI. They are about watching for any further contact, intentional or otherwise, between key representatives with either commercial or regulatory sway.

Pricing behaviour in short-dated vol instruments might start to reflect an assumption that talks aren’t completely frozen, and policy risk is being reweighted. We’ve already begun to see subtle flattening in idiosyncratic risk premiums between Asian FX pairs and USD swaps, mirroring a reduction in perceived geopolitical volatility over the trading horizon.

Traders leaning too far into a single bias on the back of hawkish rhetoric alone should conduct immediate rebalancing. The truth rarely arrives in a press release; it’s the soft gestures in a corridor near a summit stage that often move the chains.

Those trading directional risk would be wise to limit exposure on open-ended macro bets. Focus instead on finely tuned plays tied to technicals that can trigger regardless of binary event outcomes. If these off-the-record talks do gain traction, we should expect changes to begin softly—through delivery volumes, PC component restrictions adjustments, or strategic reserve tap-ins rather than high-decibel government announcements.

There’s a narrow window now where vol strategies can be built around periods of calm that others may misread as stability. It’s not. It’s merely quiet—sort of like a pair of trade envoys crossing paths and choosing to speak, even if only for a moment.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.