Back

Net Long-Term TIC Flows in the United States reached $161.8 billion, surpassing predictions of $44.2 billion

In March, the United States net long-term Treasury International Capital (TIC) flows recorded $161.8 billion, surpassing the anticipated figure of $44.2 billion. This data indicates a substantial increase compared to projections.

The information shared is for informational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice. Market activities carry inherent risks, including the potential loss of invested capital.

Investment Research

Readers are urged to conduct their research before making any financial decisions. Responsibility for investment decisions, including any losses, rests solely with the individual.

This article does not offer personalised investment recommendations, nor does it guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information presented.

Errors and omissions are excepted, and neither the author nor the source is accountable for any potential damages resulting from the use or interpretation of the information provided.

The latest TIC data from March outlines one of the largest monthly surges in net long-term Treasury purchases by foreign entities in recent memory, coming in at $161.8 billion versus an expected $44.2 billion. Such an outcome not only exceeded forecasts but more than tripled the median estimate, suggesting an unexpected appetite for long-dated US government debt at a time when rate expectations remain uncertain.

To break this down, this category of flows reflects the difference between foreign purchases and sales of US long-term securities, such as Treasuries. A positive figure means more buying than selling. It’s a metric that puts attention on international demand for dollar-denominated safe assets—and, importantly, acts as a window into confidence in the US economy as well as views on future interest rates. March’s number, especially given its magnitude, implies foreign institutions increased their exposure to longer-duration US bonds even with the yield curve still mildly inverted.

What stands out isn’t simply the size of the buying, but its timing. The Federal Reserve had by that point paused rate hikes, inflation data came in mixed, and two-year yields were drifting lower. Thus, the material upswing in foreign purchases could point to an early repositioning ahead of a potential policy shift. It also aligns, to some extent, with what the US rate futures markets were pricing in at the time—namely, the start of a cutting cycle perhaps sooner than later. That suggests a degree of alignment between global fixed income participants and forward-looking rate expectations embedded in short-term trading products.

Yields came under notable downward pressure in March, especially towards the long-end of the curve. Those purchasing Treasuries at this point may well have been positioning themselves for capital gains on pricing, not merely coupon clipping. That said, the duration risk increases if rate policy remains higher for longer, which makes the scale of such positions noteworthy considering the volatility in communication from central banks.

Foreign Bid In Treasury Markets

From where we stand, the data is making it harder to ignore the large foreign bid reasserting itself in a space that had been relatively muted in previous months. Though this is just one point in a longer time series, patterns have a way of inviting follow-through if market participants sense forward momentum building.

Derivative desk activity may need to adjust in kind. When flows of this nature gather strength, especially from overseas accounts perceived to be sensitive to currency risk or interest rate differentials, it tends to ripple into wagers on future rate moves, options positioning on Treasuries and even plays tied to FX volatility structures. Risk premia that had expanded during times of uncertainty may begin to contract as international buyers soak up supply and compress spreads.

What we may now consider is whether this move marks a trend shift or merely a one-month anomaly. The scale implies intent. Not scattershot buying, but rather, a coordinated or at least highly consensual increase in exposure. That makes higher-frequency metrics, such as weekly Federal Reserve custody flows, more relevant in the short term. If those start to reflect continued strength, early adjustments in futures positioning could be in order.

As it stands, it’s worth noting that forward interest rate volatility remains elevated but less so than before. That environment incentivises carry trades and longer-term exposures, as long as funding conditions don’t tighten unexpectedly.

Positioning, especially in rate-sensitive derivatives, may need to factor in sustained demand for duration—and potentially some hedging activity from foreign holders who have ramped up exposure. Swaption skews, gamma around front-end pricing, and curve steepening plays may all bear watching.

Taking all into account, accuracy in assessing momentum of flows and their transmission across dollar assets could create an edge in forecasting pricing behaviour during key auction windows and economic prints. We’ll be keeping a sharp eye on how much of this becomes self-reinforcing.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

CFTC’s oil net positions in the United States increased to 185.3K from 175.4K

The United States CFTC oil net positions have increased to 185.3K from the previous 175.4K. This change in net positions is an upward movement over the previous figures.

These pages include forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. It is advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions.

Market Information Caveat

The information provided is not guaranteed to be free from mistakes or timely in nature. Investing in open markets carries risks, including potential loss of principal and emotional distress.

The author holds no position in any stock mentioned and has not received compensation from any company. Errors and omissions in this information are explicitly excepted.

Neither the author nor the page are registered investment advisors. The information provided does not constitute investment advice.

With the fresh figures showing net long positions in U.S. crude oil rising to 185.3 thousand contracts, up notably from the previous 175.4 thousand, there’s a clear indication of growing speculative confidence in the energy markets. This jump, observed in the latest reporting from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), often reflects the broader market view that prices could climb. It’s worth noting that such commitments tend to swell when institutional participants expect tightening supply or stronger-than-expected demand.

Interpreting Trading Signals

From a trading standpoint, we would interpret this increase as a signal that sentiment is drifting more bullish, perhaps underpinned by geopolitical frictions, expected drawdowns in inventory data, or seasonal consumption shifts. That said, commitment levels alone shouldn’t determine directional bias; they’re better viewed together with price action, volume, and macroeconomic data such as PMI releases or dollar strength.

We may also consider what’s happening on the macroeconomic front. Inflation readings have suggested a patchy disinflation process, causing the U.S. Federal Reserve to moderate its tone. The dollar’s modest retreat over recent sessions has marginally lowered the cost of oil for non-dollar buyers, which may, in turn, support sustained price pressure to the upside. However, these inflection points can invite volatility, particularly when positioning becomes crowded.

Looking specifically at the derivatives space — where risk can be dialled up or down more fluidly — increased net longs might bring short-term pullbacks as participants seek to manage exposure. We often see that when long exposure becomes extended, the market becomes vulnerable to profit-taking, especially ahead of data-heavy weeks. With implied volatilities in call options not yet flashing extreme, however, this doesn’t currently appear overbought.

We’d suggest taking this change in positioning alongside options skew and futures curve shifts. Should the front-end of the curve remain bid and backwardation steepen, it would bolster conviction around tighter near-term supply expectations. In our experience, that’s where opportunities lie for calendar spread strategies or roll-yield plays.

Broadly, one shouldn’t rely purely on CFTC data. Instead, treat it as a part of a wider jigsaw that includes rig count trends, refinery margins, and export figures — all of which contribute to shaping expected price ranges. We find that when speculative interest climbs without confirmation from inventory or physical delivery figures, the probability of shakeouts tends to rise.

It’s also useful to pay attention to how positioning responds to macro events, such as monetary policy comments or trade data from major consuming nations like China. If we observe the net position continuing to trend upward while oil fails to break higher technically, it may suggest a divergence between positioning and price — often a red flag for mean reversal setups.

In the coming weeks, ranges may remain defined by short-term catalysts, but any expansion in net length paired with increased volatility should encourage a review of one’s risk parameters. Setting clear invalidation levels, especially when operating with leverage, could prove vital at moments when sentiment shifts abruptly. Use trailing mechanisms or reduce exposure when price fails to align with positioning direction.

Lastly, it’s always worth remembering how positioning interacts with liquidity. In thinner trading periods or around futures expiry, even small changes in sentiment can lead to outsized moves. We’ve seen that many times before. It pays to stay nimble.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The CFTC reported a decline in US S&P 500 NC Net Positions to $-122.2K

The United States CFTC reported a decrease in S&P 500 NC net positions, which fell from -76.4K to -122.2K. This shift underlines changes in trading positions, reflecting the current market sentiment.

Forward-looking statements often entail risks and uncertainties, emphasising the need for personal research before any trading decisions. No guarantee is given regarding the absence of mistakes, errors, or inaccurate statements within the provided information.

Investment Risks Responsibility

The responsibility for potential investment risks, including total principal loss, falls entirely on the individual. All views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not align with any official policy of any organisation.

The writer is uninvolved in any stock mentioned and does not maintain business relations with any companies referred to in the content. Additionally, the information is presented without compensation incentives beyond article publication.

The latest update from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission revealed that net short positions in the S&P 500 non-commercial futures have expanded considerably, dropping from -76,400 to -122,200 contracts. What this shows, clearly, is that more traders are betting against the index. It’s not a subtle dip—this widened bearish stance tells us that many large speculators are either positioning for increased volatility or are growing uneasy about the resilience of current valuations.

To make sense of these numbers, it’s helpful to consider what such a shift typically implies. When non-commercial players, who usually include hedge funds and speculators, increase short exposure at this scale, it often reflects a collective view that equities may not keep their upward pace. They are not hedging passive flows—they are directional in intent. The extension of bearish bets should not be ignored, especially not at these levels.

Assess Directionality And Market Response

From our perspective, what is clear is the strength in conviction around downward protection or outright calls against the market. Traders haven’t just lightly adjusted—they’ve meaningfully repositioned, which could be interpreted as preparation for less favourable conditions ahead, whether due to macroeconomic signals, earnings projections, or shifting monetary expectations. None of this has been done on impulse. These movements rarely appear in isolation or by chance.

Key here is how we choose to respond and assess directionality. Derivatives traders who operate on short- to medium-term horizons should weigh whether this positioning offers an opportunity to step into volatility strategies, or if risk asymmetry can be tilted in their favour by watching positioning extremes in real-time. Strong one-sidedness often opens the door to reversals, particularly if outside forces disrupt prevailing consensus. In such scenarios, mean-reversion strategies or delta-neutral positioning could become more attractive than linear bets.

We should also pay attention to options data over the next fortnight. It would be prudent to cross-reference how implied volatilities move, especially in relation to skew and term structure. If the fear premium begins bleeding into out-of-the-money put options, or if gamma starts to rise sharply on the downside, then it likely confirms that larger funds are dusting off their protection playbooks. Conversely, any compression in volatility amidst broader gloom would offer a very different outlook.

In the near term, it’s not about wholesale direction, but about whether dislocations between futures sentiment and underlying market breadth create opportunity. When speculators dig deep into short territory, the broad market often drifts into overreaction. Mispricings creep in. It’s during such phases that patience and price sensitivity tend to reward strategic entries.

All told, we’ll continue to monitor not just reported futures positions, but supporting data from volatility markets, risk reversals, and even sector rotation flows. None of these signals operate in silos. They speak to trading psychology, and to where money sees fragility rather than strength. And that’s exactly where edges are often found—quietly, not loudly.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Japan’s CFTC JPY NC Net Positions decreased to ¥172.3K, down from ¥176.9K

The CFTC reported that Japan’s JPY net positions have decreased. The current net positions stand at ¥172.3K, down from the previous ¥176.9K.

This decline might influence market perception. It is essential to conduct independent research before making financial decisions.

Understanding Market Risks

Investing in markets carries inherent risks, including potential loss of capital. Careful assessment of risks is necessary when investing.

The data should not be seen as a prompt to engage in transactions. Comprehensive evaluation is vital for informed decision-making.

The responsibility for investment decisions rests with the individual. All risks, including financial losses, remain the investor’s responsibility.

What we’re seeing here is a slight drop in net positions on the Japanese yen, falling to ¥172.3K from ¥176.9K, according to the latest figures released by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. The movement is subtle, but it’s there.

This change matters mostly because it tells us something about how large speculators are adjusting their outlooks. These net positions are a practical indicator of sentiment — when we spot a reduction like this, it typically suggests reduced confidence or simply a change in strategy among funds and institutional players. Not a wholesale reversal, but enough to make a mark.

The Significance Of Net Positions

For context, “net positions” refer to the difference between long and short contracts held by traders — specifically non-commercial ones like hedge funds. A falling figure means there’s either profit-taking going on, or traders are beginning to see less upside in holding yen exposure. It could also reflect shifts in interest rate projections or expectations around policy moves from the Bank of Japan. Since currency values are deeply tied to rate differentials, subtle repositioning tells us where expectations are being adjusted.

Keen observers would do well to recognise that while the number is still firmly positive — traders are still favouring the JPY overall — the marginal dip may hint at an emerging trend or the end of a previous one. Markets tend to move in anticipation, not reaction, and these CFTC reports offer bi-weekly glimpses into how sentiment is drifting beneath the surface.

From our standpoint, it’s worth resisting the urge to zoom in on a single data point too quickly. Overreliance on short-term shifts can be misleading if not balanced against broader trendlines and macro indicators. No change happens in a vacuum; instead, it reflects a mix of technical, economic, and psychological inputs interacting steadily over time.

As we map our next moves, options and futures traders might consider looking at currency volatilities, especially the implied vols on yen pairs. If there’s a growing divergence between price stability and positioning sentiment, it could make directional or volatility-based strategies more effective, depending on the setup. Spreads, straddles, or laddered positions might better handle the sort of uncertainty implied by this slow repositioning.

And while there’s a temptation to try to read too deeply into every shift, experience tells us that patience paired with positioning discipline wins out more often than not. Let the data come to us, assess whether it aligns with larger macro developments, and scale exposure accordingly — no rush, no panic, just clarity.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

CFTC net positions for GBP in the UK fell to £27.2K, down from £29.2K

The United Kingdom’s CFTC GBP net non-commercial positions have decreased to £27.2K from the previous £29.2K. This change was reported as of May 16, 2025.

The information presented is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be interpreted as a recommendation for any market positions. It is advisable to conduct comprehensive research before making any financial decisions.

Engaging with open markets

Engaging with open markets carries substantial risk, including potential complete investment loss. Responsibility for any such risks lies with the individual.

The content reflects the author’s views and does not represent any official stance. The author has no disclosed positions in stocks mentioned and does not have business ties with any referenced companies.

Net short positions in the British pound among non-commercial traders, as tracked by the CFTC, narrowed slightly in the week ending May 16, moving from 29.2 thousand contracts to 27.2 thousand. This moderate reduction suggests that some leveraged participants have softened their bearish stance on sterling. While the drop isn’t large, it brings attention to a possible shift in sentiment, particularly when viewed in the context of recent macroeconomic announcements and market pricing activity.

These net positions reflect wagers by investors who typically seek speculative gains, rather than those hedging currency exposure for commercial reasons. So, when we notice a narrowing like this, especially after a period of deeper shorts, it can highlight subtle changes in conviction. The pound hasn’t offered consistent directional follow-through in recent trading sessions, but this small revision may indicate that previous pessimism is being reassessed — at least to an extent.

To act accordingly, it serves us well to monitor how this translates into implied volatility and rate expectations. Given the Bank of England’s current communication cadence and recent inflation readouts, we’re in a place where slight surprises can provoke outsized market reaction. Those of us trading options might want to consider how skew is adjusting, especially on the downside, since this often reflects hedging sentiment or increasingly directional bias. Even modest shifts in net positioning like this can precede broader repositioning, particularly if confirmation emerges from rate differentials or shifting forward rate agreements.

Observe correlations

It would be sound to observe correlations between GBP net non-commercials and US dollar index movement. If DXY momentum finds some fatigue and macro headwinds for the UK abate — even temporarily — leveraged funds may not feel the urgency to reload shorts prematurely. Still, with continuing external headwinds in the form of geopolitical tensions and global monetary policy uncertainty, nothing is being interpreted in a vacuum.

There may also be an information advantage in comparing current positioning against rolling 12-month averages — which helps place these movements into perspective. If the current figure is below the yearly median, we might interpret the current bias as nearly flat, in which case responses to immediate catalysts could become more reactionary rather than trend-based.

For positioning ourselves tactically in the weeks ahead, the key may lie not just in the direction of this positioning but in the rate of change. A gradual unwind tends to coincide with subdued price swings, while sharp reversals point to more compressed and reactive conditions. Let’s keep an eye on those figures and trading volumes, as they tend to precede volatility breakouts.

In summary, what we’re seeing is some reluctance by non-commercial traders to hold enlarged short GBP positions, likely due to changes in economic expectations or caution ahead of upcoming central bank meetings. Instead of chasing extremes or assuming that past biases will persist unchecked, we might find an edge in watching the speed and magnitude of position shifts. It’s all in the tempo.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

CFTC’s gold net positions in the United States declined to $161.2K from $162.5K

The United States CFTC reports gold net positions at $161.2K, following the previous week’s $162.5K. This data is wrapped in a cautionary context regarding the risks involved in trading markets and financial instruments.

The article stresses that all information should be viewed as general commentary, not a recommendation for specific investment actions. Individuals are urged to perform independent research before engaging in any investment activities.

Understanding Market Risks

Trading in open markets, including foreign exchange, comes with inherent risks, potentially leading to the total loss of the invested capital. One is advised to thoroughly understand these risks, and consult an independent financial advisor if uncertainty persists.

Various recommendations are suggested for selecting brokers in 2025, encompassing preferences for low spreads, leverage options, and specific regional services. These guides aim to aid in navigating the complexities of the market landscape.

Last week’s release from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission placed speculative net positions in gold at 161.2 thousand contracts, slipping slightly from the prior figure of 162.5 thousand. This reflects only a modest reduction but, within context, hints at a tempering in sentiment among institutional participants. When these values are aggregated over time, they tend to offer a reliable gauge of shifting momentum and broader conviction levels — especially among larger traders who influence both direction and volatility across the metals space.

Importantly, these figures are not predictive tools on their own. They should instead be used as a confirmation or contradiction of technical or macroeconomic views already in play. A softening in net longs may not always precede short-term price weakness, but it does suggest a fading appetite for continued upside at current levels. While gold plays often hinge on factors like inflation and U.S. dollar movement, positioning trends such as this add another layer to our ongoing situational awareness.

The Art Of Cautious Trading

From our perspective, consistently tracking this type of open-interest data remains worthwhile, but with the caveat that it demands context. Weekly positioning changes, while quantified, don’t offer all the answers — they’re merely one part of the wider market puzzle. Traders often get caught overreacting to a single movement in net longs or shorts, forgetting that sentiment can shift quickly with macroeconomic releases or changing rate expectations from central banks.

The wider message conveyed in the earlier material is vital: risk doesn’t vanish, even in periods of quiet or steady pricing action. We must assume risk is always present, especially when dealing in leveraged instruments. It is absolutely essential to appreciate that capital can be lost in full — something that even seasoned market participants neglect after extended favourable runs or calm charts.

On that same point, it’s urged that everyone – regardless of their experience – approaches all guidance, outlooks, or sentiment-based visuals with a degree of scepticism. Not necessarily disbelief, but rather the kind of inquisitive caution that leads to additional research. We’ve often seen that those who take all commentary as ready-made strategy tend to misjudge or absorb risk poorly.

The brief mention of broker selection currently being discussed for the coming year is a good reminder that execution platforms themselves play a strong part in the trading experience. It’s not simply about tight spreads or leverage ratios. Regional strength, capital adequacy, licence status, and customer resolution pathways all factor into the reliability of each trade. The reality is that good execution conditions support longevity in trading. They do not guarantee better outcomes, but the environment in which you place your trades matters more than many assume.

For us, it’s preferable to think in broader thematic cycles tied to positioning data like the one in question, rather than minute-to-minute oscillations. These weekly CFTC updates have more value when examined over rolling periods, or in conjunction with price levels where net longs appeared overextended. This comparison can often lead to better entries, or even exits, during momentum reversion setups.

The guiding principle here remains the same: diligence helps in every corner of trading, from reading position reports to selecting market counterparts. Applying consistent vigilance, both in reading sentiment shifts and in preparing for practical outcomes, reduces dependence on one single market view or dependency.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

CFTC EUR NC Net Positions in the Eurozone increased from €75.7K to €84.8K

The latest data shows an increase in Eurozone CFTC EUR NC net positions, rising from €75.7K to €84.8K. This information reflects changes in the speculative positioning in the Euro, as reported by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

The figures offer insight into market sentiment and potential shifts in trader behaviour. These updates can be crucial for those analysing trends in the foreign exchange market, though they carry inherent risks and uncertainties.

The uptick in Euro net positions, moving from €75.7K to €84.8K, indicates that speculative traders are increasing their bets on the Euro strengthening relative to the US Dollar. This shift in positioning typically points to growing confidence that the Euro may see further appreciation, possibly driven by improvements in economic indicators or adjusted expectations surrounding monetary policy.

By examining the data, we can infer that participants holding long exposure are anticipating conditions that could support a stronger single currency—inflation trends cooling in the United States, for instance, or reduced expectations for Federal Reserve rate hikes could be among the contributors. Alternatively, improving macro indicators from within the bloc, such as PMI growth or stabilised consumer prices, may be warranting this shift in speculative activity.

That said, we must be clear—speculative longs at this level push positioning closer to historical highs not seen since earlier tightening cycles, which introduces the potential for crowded trades. In markets where positioning becomes heavily one-sided, and should sentiment reverse, unwind pressure could be sudden and pronounced. We’ve seen this before when volatility was low and sentiment turned quickly upon unexpected macro data.

At this point, watching the next set of Euro Area sentiment surveys and headline inflation readouts becomes critical. Should the data underperform expectations, there’s limited room for disappointment without some traders being forced to cut back. In contrast, upside surprises may accelerate positioning further.

Looking back at previous cycles, such as in late 2017 or mid-2020, similar increases in speculative net longs preceded short-term consolidations or reversals. It’s not the size of the position alone that matters—but how it behaves under pressure when faced with new economic data or headlines that challenge the prevailing narrative.

Risk appetite across global markets is also playing a role here. If bond yields begin to rise again in the United States, or if inflation expectations firm up, this could lend support to the Dollar once more. We’d need to see how that stacks up against current conviction across futures and options.

From a volatility angle, the current implied vols in EUR/USD remain relatively muted. That suggests that participants aren’t heavily hedging against a sharp move. But low volatility, in periods like this where positioning is stretched, can make options an attractive entry point—costs are low, and skew offers protection.

In the short term, we could expect this trend to be tested. Employment reports and central bank communications over the next two weeks will play into how durable the recent changes are. We should be monitoring option open interest to get a gauge of whether traders are beginning to hedge these long positions.

There’s also the matter of seasonality, often overlooked. The summer period typically brings lighter flows in FX markets, but it can also amplify turbulence when liquidity is thinner. Large positions without adequate protection can trigger sharper repricing movements if momentum shifts.

In any case, maintaining awareness of not just the positioning levels, but factor sensitivity—how markets react to developments on inflation, economic growth, and yield differentials—gives us better odds of staying on top of what comes next. Understanding what’s priced in, and what could adjust those expectations, allows us to respond rather than react.

The net positions for Australia’s CFTC AUD NC fell to $-49.3K from $-48.4K

Australia’s CFTC AUD net positions have decreased to -49.3K, down from the previous -48.4K. This data provides insight into market trends and potential shifts in the Australian dollar’s value.

The report indicates a change in the net short positions held. It’s essential to consider these figures within the broader context of market dynamics.

Market Influence And Currency Valuation

Fluctuations in positions may influence currency valuation and trading strategies. Stakeholders should remain informed and conduct thorough research on market developments.

Engagement in open market investments carries risks, including potential loss of principal. Understanding these risks is a critical aspect of responsible financial decision-making.

The latest decrease in CFTC-reported AUD net positions, now at -49.3K compared to -48.4K previously, highlights a modest rise in bearish sentiment towards the Australian dollar. While the overall positioning remains short, the incremental shift suggests traders are leaning slightly more towards downside protection, if not outright momentum. It’s not an extreme move, but one that should be watched closely in the coming weeks given its context within broader market positioning.

When we step back and compare this short interest with past ranges, current levels still reflect caution rather than panic. The Australian dollar has been under pressure recently due to softer commodity support and lingering doubts over China’s industrial demand, particularly in iron ore – Australia’s key export. The uptick in short positioning may reflect an adjustment to those macroeconomic inputs rather than a fully-fledged directional conviction.

Looking at the pace of the change, the move is subtle, yet it echoes a broader theme we’ve observed among leveraged funds that are seeking hedging opportunities more than directional exposure. Traders are not necessarily amplifying downside bets aggressively but are becoming slightly less optimistic. We’ve seen similar behaviour before other periods of policy speculation or risk repricing.

Positioning And Market Reactions

Now is an appropriate time for us to reassess how macro shifts are feeding into short-term tactical setups. Volatility clusters around events such as Reserve Bank policy adjustments, which could explain part of this adjustment. With the RBA maintaining a cautious stance, and inflation prints still variable regionally, currency markets may stay reactive rather than predictive. That often favours nimble positioning rather than extended holding periods.

In terms of how this affects our approach to positioning, we’re likely moving into a phase where short-term catalysts such as inflation surprises or rate repricing assumptions could drive sharp but contained moves. These net positioning data points are valuable as sentiment markers but are not signals in themselves. Our best use of them is to view them as part of a broader confirmation process. When net shorts creep wider without dramatic external drivers, it tells us that expectations are being reset more gradually, potentially in anticipation of macro data.

Risk management remains our anchor through any of these adjustments, especially as summer in the Northern Hemisphere tends to bring thinner markets, where exaggerated currency moves aren’t uncommon. Even modest changes in sentiment like the one we’re seeing here can translate into larger market response due to reduced liquidity.

Context matters – hence, incorporating these figures into a structured trading thesis means layering them on top of real-time economic releases, option market skew, and relative central bank policy expectations. For instance, if we continue seeing sentiment turn against AUD without sharp declines in price, it may suggest an underlying demand that’s keeping the currency supported. Conversely, should both sentiment and price shift in tandem, it’s worth preparing for trends to accelerate.

Our key takeaway is this: data on positioning should refine and shape our assumptions, not dictate them. When we see incremental moves like this one—more defensive, not aggressive—it hints at a market bracing for possible volatility but not betting outright against the currency’s trajectory. The positioning drift lower aligns with a growing wait-and-see approach rather than a rush for the exits.

We should be sharpening our focus now on economic data schedules and any adjustments in China’s growth outlook, which could weigh further on AUD sentiment. Bond yield differentials and commodity flow updates will also remain high on the list as we determine where relative value might emerge.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Following a gap up, S&P 500 futures are expected to rise beyond 5,960 amid bullish momentum

Technical Analysis Overview

S&P 500 Futures (ESM2025) exhibited a strong uptrend for the week of May 12–17, maintaining a consistent upward channel since a sharp gap higher on May 13. The price stayed above the VWAP mid-line, with major volume spikes turning the 5,845–5,860 zone into a new support area around 5,880–5,900.

Immediate resistance is set at 5,960, with further barriers at 5,969, 5,981, and 6,000. If the uptrend persists and the price breaks through 5,960, targets include 5,981 and potentially 6,000. Conversely, failure to close above 5,960 could lead to declines toward 5,943 and a retest of the VWAP mid-line.

In a bullish scenario, a sustained move above 5,960 would push prices toward higher resistance zones, while staying within the channel encourages buying during dips. In contrast, rejection around 5,960 could prompt a swing downward, with losses accumulating if the price drops below key support levels, such as the VWAP band.

For traders, a long position is considered if 5,960 is broken, with a short position advisable if the level is rejected. Risk management is crucial with defined stop-loss and position sizing strategies.

Decision Making and Risk Management

What we’ve seen in the past several sessions from S&P 500 futures—the ESM2025 contract—has been a firm push upward, anchored by a strong technical foundation that’s held since the price gapped higher at the start of the week. That initial jump, particularly on 13 May, injected volume and confidence into the move, effectively establishing a base of support around the 5,880 to 5,900 range. Activity around 5,845 to 5,860 added confirmation that the market was comfortable holding these levels, with higher trading volumes carving out what appears to now be a dependable floor.

Throughout the week, prices hugged the upper section of an upward trading channel and consistently held above the VWAP mid-line—a strong indicator of ongoing momentum from institutional order flow. This sustained positioning above the volume-weighted average price means that buying activity has remained dominant and that sellers have, so far, failed to apply pressure consistently enough to reverse the move.

As of now, the immediate resistance level stands at 5,960. This is not just a price barrier; it represents a potential decision point. Current price action suggests that if futures manage to push cleanly above it—and, importantly, maintain that level intraday or on a closing basis—then the door opens to targets at 5,981 and then a psychological test at 6,000. These are not arbitrary numbers; they are structurally relevant based on prior swing highs and short-term trading projections. That means any break above 5,960 isn’t just about exuberance, it’s about a pattern continuing with conviction.

However, if futures fail to settle above 5,960 despite testing it, it could imply that there’s exhaustion, at least temporarily. A pullback could then trigger, guiding price down to 5,943 and possibly setting the stage for a return to the VWAP mid-level, which currently serves as dynamic support within the channel. If that level gets breached, it points to a shifting dynamic in short-term sentiment and would raise the likelihood of a deeper retracement through previous support zones.

Barriers like these are best viewed as inflection points, rather than pivots for all-in positioning. This is where planning comes before participation. Taking trades only when prices commit convincingly—either through volume expansion or strong candle closes—reduces the likelihood of being caught in whipsaw moves.

When making decisions next week, we favour what the structure is saying. So if the 5,960 level breaks convincingly, we focus on long setups with stops placed just below invalidation zones, ideally under short-term support or the VWAP channel, to avoid being caught in intraday noise. But if there’s weakness and 5,960 is firmly rejected, then the move lower may suggest an opportunity the other way. In that case, short exposures should come with a clear exit plan in case of a reversal, particularly near the lower bounds of support zones, where previous buying stepped in.

Position sizing should always reflect the risk being taken. Larger stops for wider volatility might mean smaller overall positions, while tighter ranges may permit slightly more aggressive sizing—but never beyond what’s manageable. Using the VWAP bands to gauge bias remains helpful, but it’s the confluence of price action, volume, and dynamic levels like these that typically deliver the most clarity in these setups.

Generally, when price stays contained within an ascending channel and remains above VWAP, that supports buying into weakness—but only when retracements align with volume support and structure. Risk gets elevated when emotions take over, so the smarter approach has always been to wait for the setup, trust the process, and define what would invalidate your position before clicking anything.

We’ll continue tracking volume shifts and how price reacts around resistance—watching closely whether momentum fails or carries beyond the 5,960 level into that 5,981 to 6,000 zone. Reaction there will tell us more than forecasts will.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Canadian Dollar fluctuated against the US Dollar, losing prior gains and stabilising around 1.4000

The Canadian Dollar has been fluctuating against the US Dollar, with USD/CAD staying around the 1.4000 mark. This movement occurs amid changing US trade policies, influencing market risk cycles.

Canadian inflation data, including the Consumer Price Index (CPI), is due next Tuesday, following the Victoria Day holiday on Monday. Price action has been impacted by the 200-day Exponential Moving Average, and significant moves are required to break current levels.

factors influencing canadian dollar performance

The Canadian Dollar’s performance is driven by factors such as Bank of Canada’s interest rates, oil prices, and economic health. The health of the US economy also significantly affects the CAD.

Interest rates set by the Bank of Canada can influence the Canadian Dollar’s value. Decisions on interest rates and quantitative easing impact the appeal of the CAD to global capital.

Oil prices affect the Canadian Dollar due to Canada’s strong petroleum export role. Rising oil prices generally boost the CAD.

Inflation impacts the Canadian Dollar, as central banks may raise interest rates in response, attracting capital inflows. Macroeconomic data also plays a role, with strong economic data boosting CAD’s value, while weak data can lead to depreciation.

We’ve seen USD/CAD hover near the 1.4000 level, a point that’s acted more like a magnet than just a checkpoint on the charts. This range-bound nature isn’t coincidental. Shifts in U.S. trade policies have rebooted market sentiment in shorter cycles, forcing traders to reassess exposure with greater frequency. It’s not just about reacting to headlines; it’s about reading how these changes influence broader risk appetite and capital flow positioning.

With inflation data out of Canada just around the corner—specifically CPI numbers due on Tuesday—there’s bound to be fresh activity. But that release comes straight after a bank holiday, which tends to thin out liquidity and sometimes causes more erratic price movement. That makes timing especially important next week. Any surprises in CPI will be taken as possible hints of future policy adjustments. Stickier inflation would likely reignite expectations of another rate hike, but that’s far from guaranteed.

The 200-day EMA has been a focal point in recent weeks—not because it tells us where price must go, but because it reflects consensus over a longer horizon. The problem? Price has been spending too long near that level without conviction. From a trading standpoint, that kind of indecision can be dangerous if misread. Unless we get a strong fundamental catalyst, either from the CPI release or external drivers like oil or U.S. data, the current technical levels will probably hold.

Interest rates remain a key directional driver. The last few Bank of Canada statements have maintained a somewhat cautious stance, despite earlier tightening. If traders begin to believe that the BoC is behind the curve—especially if inflation shows strength—then the CAD could get a bump. But if instead we see signs of weakening demand or lower wage growth, that bullish narrative weakens quickly.

the role of oil and economic data

Oil, naturally, continues to play its part. When prices at the crude benchmark start climbing, there’s usually more foreign buying of CAD. That’s because petroleum exports are deeply tied to Canada’s fiscal health. Today’s correlation might not be as strong as it was a decade ago, but the impact is still noteworthy and shouldn’t be dismissed. Any uptick in oil prices, especially if driven by tight global supply or unexpected geopolitics, may offer CAD support.

Macroeconomic numbers from both sides of the border will need close monitoring. Stronger U.S. growth will place pressure on the BoC, especially if the Federal Reserve maintains a firmer tone than expected. On the flip side, weaker Canadian data could derail any remaining hawkish sentiment, even if inflation edges higher. Markets often react more to the direction of surprises rather than the actual data points.

As volatility tends to rise around major economic releases, option premiums in CAD should adjust accordingly, particularly near term. The implied volatility skew might offer clues about positioning ahead of CPI. Watching how the front-end of the curve is priced compared to later terms will offer insights on short-term expectations versus long-run conviction.

We should give extra weight to how traders position through the weekend. Lack of market participation on Monday due to the Victoria Day break could force dealers to rebalance more aggressively ahead of Tuesday’s inflation report. Hedge demand might show up in early Asia or Europe hours, creating movement before North America is even online.

For now, we track CPI expectations closely. Any deviation from consensus will likely spill directly into rate expectations and steepen interest rate futures pricing. This, in turn, should pass through to front-end forwards and influence spot positioning. Strong inflation is not viewed in isolation; it resets everything—from rates to flows—and those become cues for next steps.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Back To Top
server

Hello there 👋

How can I help you?

Chat with our team instantly

Live Chat

Start a live conversation through...

  • Telegram
    hold On hold
  • Coming Soon...

Hello there 👋

How can I help you?

telegram

Scan the QR code with your smartphone to start a chat with us, or click here.

Don’t have the Telegram App or Desktop installed? Use Web Telegram instead.

QR code