USD/CHF is retreating from previous gains, trading near 0.8360, influenced by the US credit rating downgrade. Moody’s reduced the US rating from Aaa to Aa1, alongside similar actions by Fitch and S&P in the past.

## US Dollar Resilience and Trade Optimism
The US Dollar showed resilience due to optimism about a 90-day US-China trade truce and anticipated new trade deals. However, concerns arise as President Trump plans tariffs on uncooperative trade partners.

Economic data shows easing inflation, prompting speculation about Federal Reserve interest rate cuts in 2025. Weak US Retail Sales data further fuels concerns of prolonged subdued economic growth.

USD/CHF losses might be limited by Swiss Franc weakness due to possible SNB monetary easing. The SNB may cut rates, adding to pressure on the Franc.

The Swiss Franc is heavily influenced by Switzerland’s economic health and Eurozone relations. It serves as a safe-haven asset, gaining value during market stress due to Switzerland’s stable economy.

## Swiss Franc and Eurozone Relations
Swiss economic data and Eurozone stability are vital to the Franc’s valuation. High economic growth and financial stability in Switzerland strengthen CHF, while weakening data might prompt depreciation.

The earlier paragraphs lay out a shifting picture in the USD/CHF pair, driven by events on both sides of the Atlantic. In short, pressure has built up against the US Dollar following a downgraded credit rating by Moody’s, echoing adjustments earlier made by Fitch and S&P. This kind of move chips away at perception, forcing market participants to reassess long-term debt sustainability and the government’s capacity to manage deficits under growing spending pressures.

Despite that, the Dollar didn’t spiral as one might have expected. Optimism about stabilised trade relations between the US and China lent support. The idea of a 90-day truce injected confidence back into markets, and hopes of fresh trade pacts fuelled bids for the Greenback. But this enthusiasm wasn’t limitless. Reports of new tariffs aimed at allies deemed ‘uncooperative’ have put uncertainty back on the table. The underlying tone here is one of fragile stability.

Adding to the swell of uncertainty, US inflation data is on a slower trajectory, stoking bets that the Federal Reserve might start easing by 2025. That’s not tomorrow, but it shapes the forward curve. Throw in weak retail data and you’ve got a recipe for growing conviction that economic softness—not resilience—will be the dominant narrative going forward. Any bets on rate hikes appear behind us. Traders looking ahead may need to reposition accordingly, with the assumption now being that the current pause could stretch well into the second half of next year.

On the Franc side of this currency story, conditions are less than straightforward. While CHF typically benefits in downturns thanks to Switzerland’s reputation for neutrality and fiscal caution, that advantage may be waning. The Swiss National Bank seems to be inching towards more lenient policy as inflation remains under control and regional pressures weigh on sentiment. A cut from the SNB would take away yield support, just as it’s becoming more critical in a low-rate world.

Moreover, traders can’t ignore the Franc’s sensitivity to developments in the Eurozone. The tight economic ties mean that volatility out of Germany or France inevitably finds its way into Swiss assets. Now, if European growth falters or inflation fails to pick up, demand for the Franc may not translate to strength as easily as before.

With USD/CHF trading near 0.8360, any further declines in the pair may not be immediate or extreme. Weakness in the US Dollar could, in theory, push the pair lower. But that depends heavily on whether the SNB’s next move matches market expectations. Increased chances of rate reductions could balance out some downward pressure on the Dollar, particularly if US yields continue their slow drift down and traders cool expectations for economic recovery.

We’re now entering a period where incoming macro releases—both from the US and Switzerland—could trigger fast realignments. Attention needs to remain fixed on inflation prints, consumer trends, and central bank communications. Reaction to policy minutes and speeches will arguably become more influential than the underlying data, as clues about timing and pace of easing become clearer.

In short, the environment encourages tactical flexibility. Fading rallies or strength in either direction may warrant a closer look at positioning, especially with global financial conditions showing signs of adjustment. It’s not just yields and economic surprises to watch—it’s whether these shifts align fast enough with market expectations. That gap, if wide enough, opens the door for sharper repricing. Keep the focus squarely on policy tone shifts and any sign of a decoupling between actual data and market assumptions.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

FX option expiries for May 19 at 10:00 Eastern Time include the following. For EUR/USD, there is an amount of EUR 375 million at 1.1150.

In GBP/USD, GBP 559 million is listed at 1.3300. USD/JPY shows USD 1.2 billion at 146.50 and USD 1.5 billion at 147.00.

USD/CHF has USD 159 million at 0.8420. For AUD/USD, amounts include AUD 563 million at 0.6525 and AUD 595 million at 0.6355.

Usd Cad Expiry Levels

USD/CAD lists USD 529 million at 1.3675 and USD 587 million at 1.3985. Finally, in NZD/USD, there is NZD 1 billion at 0.5915.

Recent market movements indicate EUR/USD approaching 1.1300 due to US Dollar selling. Meanwhile, GBP/USD is nearing 1.3400 following a US credit rating downgrade.

Gold prices have risen, trading near $3,250 per ounce after the US credit rating was lowered. Concerns about economic indicators and trade talks are currently influencing market dynamics.

China’s economy shows slower activity in April, particularly in retail sales and fixed-asset investment. Although manufacturing was affected, the impact was less severe than anticipated.

Usd Chf Movements And Implications

The expiry list for May 19 features a few areas that might pull or push pricing as they mature, particularly where large notional amounts are clustered. For example, the 1.1150 level in EUR/USD—backed by EUR 375 million—may begin to lose relevance even if price action slows as this level sits well below the market, which crept towards 1.1300. That’s largely been driven by consistent US Dollar selling pressure. As a result, any attempt at retracement faces resistance not from fresh technical levels, but rather from market participants unwinding previous long-USD exposure.

Sterling, meanwhile, found support following the US credit rating downgrade. The GBP/USD pair pushed up near 1.3400, placing strain on the 1.3300 expiry (GBP 559 million), which becomes less influential unless we see a broader risk-off retracement. Traders holding short-dated directional positions should remain mindful of any sharp pricing action that might pull the pair back towards these lower levels, though it appears unlikely without a shift in broader risk sentiment.

The Dollar-Yen pair reflects a different energy. USD 1.2 billion at 146.50 and another USD 1.5 billion at 147.00 sit close enough to current spot levels to impact price through hedging flows, particularly as Japanese investors have been sensitive to yield differentials. Should we see an increase in US Treasury yields again this week, those expiry levels may offer boundaries, potentially holding the pair in their range. These volumes suggest some comfort in two-sided risk in this zone.

In USD/CHF, the USD 159 million at 0.8420 is minor and unlikely to hinder intraday price action, especially given market attention has been elsewhere. Swiss Franc movement has been muted absent of broader USD trends or domestic surprises, so any resulting volatility from this expiry seems limited unless unexpected headlines emerge.

Moving to AUD/USD, there’s AUD 563 million at 0.6525 and AUD 595 million at 0.6355. These expiry levels, although distant from the current spot, could offer some psychological anchors—not so much due to positioning near strike levels but possibly as re-engagement areas should volatility increase. If we consider the slower April data emerging from China, particularly in retail and fixed asset investment, the Australian Dollar could stay under pressure in the medium term, which adds gravity to the lower expiry region.

USD/CAD features expiries at 1.3675 and 1.3985 with values above half a billion USD each. The Canadian Dollar’s reaction might be somewhat more twitchy ahead of these levels if there is renewed oil price volatility or movement out of North America’s bond markets. When expiry strikes sit this far apart and carry moderate size, the focus often turns to volatility proximity—i.e., how close spot gets and how quickly. If momentum builds either way into options maturity, they’ll matter more. If price stays between, impact dilutes.

Finally, the NZD/USD pair presents NZD 1 billion around 0.5915. This size is not to be ignored, sitting reasonably close to where price action has paused. With China’s data weakness simmering under the surface, the Kiwi—being sensitive to Asia-Pacific developments—could continue facing downside pressure. If so, this expiry may act as a short-term draw, especially as risk sentiment deteriorates around global trade.

Gold trading closer to $3,250 hints at generally softer Dollar appeal and continued refuge-seeking behaviours. There’s added tension around macro indicators and trade negotiations, and that uncertainty keeps precious metals attractive. We expect derivative positioning to take cues from broader Fed tone and global risk appetite for the remainder of the month.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Gold prices increased in Saudi Arabia on Monday with gold priced at 388.28 Saudi Riyals (SAR) per gram, up from SAR 386.20 on Friday. The price per tola rose to SAR 4,528.49 from SAR 4,504.51.

Central banks are the largest holders of gold, adding 1,136 tonnes worth around $70 billion to their reserves in 2022. Emerging economies such as China, India, and Turkey are actively increasing their gold reserves.

Gold And The US Dollar

Gold often has an inverse correlation with the US Dollar and US Treasuries. As a safe-haven asset, gold price fluctuations are influenced by geopolitical instability and interest rate changes.

When the US Dollar depreciates, gold prices typically rise due to its pricing in dollars (XAU/USD). Changes in interest rates and geopolitical concerns also impact gold prices.

That gold prices moved higher at the start of the week, coming in at 388.28 SAR per gram compared to 386.20 SAR last Friday, offers clear evidence of continued demand. Similarly, the per tola price edged up to 4,528.49 SAR. Even these moderate increases suggest traders are re-evaluating their positions in light of shifts in macroeconomic conditions and broader reserve strategies.

More telling, however, is the activity of central banks. In 2022, they bought over a thousand tonnes of gold, with the total spend hovering around $70 billion. We see that this was not random accumulation. Rather, it has been led by nations including China, India, and Turkey—each facing their own monetary and geopolitical pressures. From that, it’s apparent that gold continues to hold weight in monetary strategy, particularly where exposure to the US Dollar presents risk.

As markets assess value, historical relationships matter. Gold has long moved in reverse to the Dollar and US Treasury yields. The logic isn’t complex: when the Dollar slides, the nominal price of gold—quoted in USD—appears more attractive to buyers holding other currencies. That, in turn, supports upward movement in gold itself. Derivatives traders would do well to monitor the strength of the Dollar Index and sentiment around rate policy with this in mind.

Interest Rates And Geopolitical Factors

Interest rates are another influence that deserves attention. When rates rise, there’s a comparative appeal in yield-bearing assets, which can dull the shine of unyielding instruments like gold. However, when risk-off sentiment creeps in—whether from monetary tightening cycles nearing exhaustion or rising strategic tensions—gold gets a new bid. What we often observe in these environments is a rotation back into protective holdings.

The geopolitical thread shouldn’t be downplayed either. Recent price movements hint at positioning adjustments reflecting broader unease—from regional conflicts to broader diplomatic uncertainty. These moments tend to ignite interest in metals, not necessarily for their role in production, but for their symbolic and monetary resilience.

In this setting, it is worth paying close attention to forward guidance from central banks, the shape of the yield curve, and volatility in currency markets. Each carries information about where capital may next shift. For those on the derivatives end, range-bound behaviour in gold may offer opportunities via volatility strategies, particularly as volume continues to rise and premiums adjust under new expectations. Short-term trades must be highly selective, while longer dated options still price in room for macro-driven surprises. The compression of implied vols in recent sessions should not be trusted without question. We are watching that closely.

Meanwhile, balance sheet expansion or contraction by policy institutions could act as a leading indicator for gold exposure readjustments. When these institutions either increase reserves or hint at changing the mix of their holdings, market responses often precede formal data. There’s advantage in tracking these developments early, particularly for those working with synthetic exposures or rolling futures.

Ultimately, the numbers we’re seeing in the Saudi market reflect more than just local buying. They tie directly to broader flows, and those are being informed by technical shifts and real-world hedging needs.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

On Monday, gold prices in Pakistan experienced a rise, with the price per gram reaching 29,161.19 Pakistani Rupees (PKR), up from 29,032.10 PKR on the previous Friday. The price per tola increased to PKR 340,130.40 from PKR 338,624.70.

Moody’s recently downgraded the US sovereign credit rating to “Aa1,” citing growing debt concerns. Additionally, US Treasury Secretary announced intentions to impose tariffs on non-compliant trading partners, supporting the precious metal’s role as a safe-haven asset.

Impact Of Economic Reports

Economic reports like the US Consumer Price Index and Producer Price Index indicated easing inflation, with US Retail Sales data pointing to sluggish economic growth. The University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index showed a decrease from 52.2 in April to 50.8, the lowest since June 2022, supporting expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts.

The US Dollar struggles against the backdrop of dovish Federal Reserve expectations, benefiting gold. Geopolitical tensions between Israel-Hamas and Russia-Ukraine maintain gold’s allure amidst market uncertainty. Gold prices in Pakistan reflect international rates adjusted for local currency and units, and are updated daily based on the prevailing market conditions.

The article highlights a modest yet noticeable increase in local gold prices, driven largely by global influences rather than domestic market shifts. When we take a closer look at the numbers, the rise in Pakistani gold prices—both per gram and per tola—is tied directly to movements in international gold rates, and these are in turn heavily influenced by wider financial and geopolitical developments.

Moody’s Downgrade And Its Implications

Moody’s recent decision to lower the credit rating of the United States to “Aa1” underlines elevated concerns about Washington’s rising debt levels. Such a downgrade typically signals a reduction in investor confidence in government-issued bonds. More importantly for us, when this kind of sentiment spreads, capital tends to flow towards assets with historically safer reputations. Gold sits comfortably in that category.

Yellen’s announcement of prospective tariffs against trading partners not in compliance adds another layer of uncertainty to international trade relations. Actions like these create noise in foreign exchange markets and heighten the perception of risk worldwide, which again tends to bolster demand for gold, whether physical or contractual.

Inflationary data also deserves attention. The Consumer Price Index and Producer Price Index from the US, both commonly used to gauge inflation pressure, have recently shown signs of softening. Retail sales in the States remained subdued, suggesting that consumer activity—the backbone of the US economy—is slowing. If demand from households continues to cool, that often paves the way for monetary easing. The dip in the University of Michigan’s Consumer Sentiment Index adds further evidence that American consumers aren’t optimistic right now. Since the index is regarded as a barometer of economic confidence, a drop like this often supports dovish monetary stances.

As expectations for rate reductions from the Federal Reserve build, the value of the dollar weakens. Since gold is priced in dollars, this made it less expensive for holders of other currencies, which pushes demand—and prices—upward.

From our perspective, alignment between weakening inflation and weaker consumer metrics bolsters the case for a less aggressive US monetary policy. This continues to hold implications for instruments tethered to gold’s volatility or value.

Elsewhere, tensions in Eastern Europe and the Middle East aren’t retreating. Both the Israel-Hamas conflict and the continued fallout from Russia’s war in Ukraine serve to maintain market concern. This uncertainty adds tailwinds to safe-haven trading behaviour. Whenever we notice escalation or erratic developments in those regions, hedging activity often follows suit.

All these factors loop back into pricing models. Since Pakistani gold prices are effectively a function of international valuations adjusted through currency exchange and local market premiums, elevated global prices will continue to affect domestic metrics. Exchange rate fluctuations obviously play a role here, and any pressure on the Pakistani Rupee would amplify imported inflation, including metal commodities.

In the days ahead, it’s key to discipline short-term positioning based on macro releases out of the US and any surprise headline risk from geopolitical fronts. The Federal Reserve’s communications, especially speeches or unscheduled releases, often shift market pricing quickly. Reactions in gold futures or options could be swift and exaggerated under lower liquidity conditions. This might present advantages for timing-focused strategies, particularly when coupled with skewness in implied metrics.

It’s also worth keeping an eye on how yields behave. If Treasury returns continue to inch downwards, gold might maintain its upward bias purely through yield compression effects. Traders with exposure to derivatives may want to balance these data points with implied volatility levels and any dislocations between paper and physical market demand.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The USD/CAD remains stable above the mid-1.3900s, influenced by mixed signals. Slightly weaker Oil prices negatively impact the Canadian Dollar, while a potential US rate cut and a US credit rating downgrade weigh on the USD.

The currency pair hovers in a familiar range, around 1.3965-1.3970, during the Asian session, affected by varied fundamental factors. Softening Oil prices benefit USD/CAD, but US Dollar selling restrains bullish moves, limiting the pair’s upside gains.

Market Expectations For Rate Cuts

Market expectations for further Federal Reserve rate cuts, amid slowing US economic growth and a credit rating downgrade, keep the US Dollar subdued. Discussions on a potential US-Canada trade deal provide hope, offering some support to the Canadian Dollar.

Monday lacks major economic data from the US or Canada, focusing market attention on speeches by Federal Open Market Committee members. As Oil price dynamics evolve, they may present short-term trading opportunities for USD/CAD.

The Canadian Dollar’s performance is influenced by Bank of Canada interest rate decisions, Oil prices, and economic health. Higher inflation, economic strength, and robust Oil prices typically support a stronger Canadian Dollar.

What we’re seeing just now with the USD/CAD pair is a market caught between several conflicting influences. The current price action – maintaining itself just above the 1.3950 level – suggests comfort within a well-established range, but with quiet tension underneath. During the recent Asian session, price movements lacked direction, as no single factor asserted control. Softening in Oil prices, which usually drags the Canadian Dollar lower, is doing its part to keep the pair afloat. At the same time, a sense of caution about the US Dollar, fuelled by concerns over future interest rate cuts and last week’s downgrade in credit rating, is putting a lid on any broad upside.

Much of the focus is on the Federal Reserve and how persistent they will be with rate reductions through the remainder of the year. Market consensus leans towards further easing, primarily because recent indicators from the US suggest that the economy might be losing steam. Slower growth tends to lower the appeal of a currency, especially when paired with yield expectations being pulled back. As a result, Dollar rallies are being sold into more regularly now, even when Oil is weak – a sign of shifting sentiment among participants.

Thin Economic Data Calendar

The data calendar is unusually thin, especially for a Monday. With no key economic reports due from either Washington or Ottawa, the attention naturally turns to policymakers. Several FOMC officials are scheduled to speak, and the market will be watching closely not only for clues on timing or scale of rate moves, but also for any fresh insight into how the Fed views labour markets and inflation persistence.

Any mention of a faster pace to rate cuts or doubts about the economy’s resilience could reactivate bearish bets on the Dollar. Meanwhile, any language that sounds like a pushback may lift yields again, prompting quick moves in derivatives pricing, particularly on short-dated contracts.

The Canadian side offers a bit more ambiguity. Hopes surrounding a possible shift in trade discussions between the two countries seem to have underpinned some support for the local currency. That said, with Oil under pressure and overall commodity demand not picking up sharply, those supports feel temporary. So far, we’ve only seen muted reaction from positioning data, but short-term traders eyeing futures should be alert to sudden news flow around energy or North American political ties, which could jolt sentiment.

On the monetary policy front, the Bank of Canada has kept its cards close to its chest. Inflation here hasn’t fallen fast enough to make a decisive call on rate cuts, which means any stronger data from the Canadian economy could reinforce the idea that policy will stay tight longer – at least relative to the US. When this happens, net positioning often swings quickly, and if the data shifts the bias even slightly to the hawkish side, it would lend some strength to the Canadian Dollar. That would add pressure back to the 1.3900 support region.

For those trading derivatives, short-term volatility looks likely to remain sensitive to any directional moves in Oil and surprise commentary from central bank officials. Until then, the spot price ranges may continue to act as boundaries, with 1.3900 serving as the key base and the higher end near 1.4000 acting as resistance. There’s a strong case here for range-focused strategies, with optionality playing well if implied volatility rises in reaction to rate expectations shifting once again.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

China’s National Bureau of Statistics reported stable economic growth in April, despite external pressures. The economy continued on an upward trend, with steady foreign trade growth, even overcoming external shocks.

The Belt and Road initiative is aiding trade diversification. However, China’s internal driving force for investment growth is considered insufficient, necessitating improved investment efficiency and optimisation.

Impact Of Low Price Environment On Businesses

The current low price environment may pressure businesses and impact income growth. Policies aim to foster economic recovery, with a focus on expanding demand and industrial restructuring.

The Australian Dollar gained 0.28% to 0.6420 against the USD. Factors influencing the Australian Dollar include Reserve Bank of Australia interest rates, the price of iron ore, and the health of the Chinese economy.

High interest rates typically support the AUD, while lower rates and quantitative easing have the opposite effect. China’s economic condition directly impacts AUD due to strong trade ties, especially in raw materials like iron ore.

A positive trade balance strengthens the AUD, driven by demand for Australian exports. This involves a surplus in earnings from exports compared to imports, enhancing the Australian currency’s value.

Implications For Currency Markets

We’ve seen a continuation of measured economic growth from China into April, even in the face of outside challenges, according to recent data. Despite global headwinds, trade activity held its ground, showing resilience where many expected more softness. There’s visible momentum behind the international reach of China’s infrastructure initiatives, but within its borders, domestic investment isn’t keeping pace with broader targets. In particular, capital allocation lacks punch — it looks like companies and local governments aren’t using funds as wisely or energetically as before.

What stands out most to us is how price levels remain subdued. This lack of inflation might sound comforting on the surface, especially to households, but it raises concerns further up the chain. With this kind of pricing environment, businesses find it harder to expand margins and raise wages. That tends to feed into weaker consumer spending down the line. Authorities have responded by leaning into demand measures — strategic investment in infrastructure and incentives intended to shift production towards higher-value industries. They know time is tight if they want a firm recovery before external demand dips again.

Over to currency markets, where the Australian Dollar has nudged up, gaining ground near 0.6420 against the US currency. The small move upwards is interesting, given how much the AUD takes its cues from both domestic rate policy and what’s unfolding in China. Iron ore remains front and centre here — it is still Australia’s heavyweight export. When demand for that mineral boosts, so too does the Australian currency. And so, as China’s factories keep the machines humming, orders for raw inputs stay consistent.

Interest rates in Australia are still high enough to lend support to the currency. While many expected earlier rate cuts, hesitation persists around loosening too quickly. We’re watching how the Reserve Bank weighs inflation targets versus the drag on household spending. Every meeting seems to contain potential clues about where the market places rate projections — these details matter for short-dated derivative contracts, particularly swaps and rate futures.

Trade surpluses have historically been a tailwind. When export earnings outpace import costs, the current account improves, creating a demand pressure that lifts the currency. But this effect is conditional. If Chinese construction softens or industrial activity dips below expected levels, the knock-on effect could reflect quickly in ore futures and forward currency pricing.

We expect these dynamics will continue to nudge interest rate hedges and currency options through the next couple of price cycles. Any shifts in China’s policy — whether more support or stimulus targeting internal demand — would inevitably shift sentiment. As volatility clusters around these announcements, liquidity pockets could widen, especially around expiry dates and news releases.

Monitoring how quickly Chinese stimulus channels through the system will be key. Whether by local government support or central coordination, effects on commodity imports and manufacturing demand will surface quickly in contract positioning. Traders should focus on how long the current inflation lull persists and whether authorities opt to reflate through broader infrastructure outlays or internal consumption support. Either approach filters into both the velocity and scope of Australian export performance — and, by extension, currency sensitivity. Carefully time entry and exit points based on these evolving signals.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Dear Client,

Please note that the dividends of the following products will be adjusted accordingly. Index dividends will be executed separately through a balance statement directly to your trading account, and the comment will be in the following format “Div & Product Name & Net Volume”.

Please refer to the table below for more details:

The above data is for reference only, please refer to the MT4/MT5 software for specific data.

If you’d like more information, please don’t hesitate to contact info@vtmarkets.com.

A spokesperson from China’s National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) stated that consumption will more greatly influence economic growth in the future. They noted that, despite a complex and severe international environment and internal challenges, numerous favourable conditions support continued economic recovery.

In April, external impacts increased, but the economic recovery trend persisted. Gradual policy implementation is anticipated to aid this recovery, expectedly boosting the economy’s improvement. According to earlier reports, China’s industrial output rose by 6.1% in April 2025 compared to the previous year. This growth exceeded the forecast of 5.5% but was lower than the previous 7.7% increase. Chinese officials maintain confidence in the steady growth of the economy despite existing pressures.

consumption driving future growth

The above remarks reflect a continued belief from officials that consumption, rather than investment or exports, will take on a larger role in driving growth moving forward. It suggests a pivot towards domestic demand and implies sustained government backing to propel spending at home. While international volatility and local pressures remain present, the claims rest on a variety of structural supports that may reinforce positive momentum over time—such as policy interventions, ongoing reforms, and subsidies.

Industrial production climbing by 6.1% year-on-year signals residual strength, especially since it surpassed market expectations. However, it’s worth noting that the pace has slowed from the prior month. This deceleration cannot be overlooked. It points to underlying friction, likely rooted in weaker external orders and a softer real estate sector. Still, the excess beyond the forecast tells us that output resilience is not fading outright. There’s cushion left, even if thinner than before.

Those interpreting these indicators would likely benefit from treating the uptick in consumption talk not as a detached forecast, but as a directional steer for what follows. The emphasis placed by the Bureau isn’t accidental—it’s a signal closely tied to where fresh support may be concentrated. Infrastructure incentives may plateau, replaced instead by measures which drive household disposable income higher, or ease access to credit, especially for smaller cities and rural areas.

global tensions and local impacts

April’s figures came amid rising global tensions and subdued investor sentiment worldwide. That industrial growth held up under such conditions itself offers hints about local bottlenecks easing. Upcoming announcements tied to monetary flexibility—such as potential adjustments to policy rates or reserve requirements—will be worth watching closely, especially for those tracking near-term trends in commodities and manufacturing demand.

We see that the current narrative leans towards stability, underpinned by government confidence. This should not be misread as complacency. For those assessing forward contracts, odds are that volatility metrics remain elevated short-term, particularly across industries that rely on trade exposure or face high leverage. In the coming sessions, patterns in retail sales and service-sector PMI data may offer sharper signals.

Lastly, clarity on stimulus timing and size—especially around urban development or energy transitions—will matter far more than broad declarations of optimism. When that visibility improves, expect sharper directional conviction. Until then, defensive hedging strategies might remain wise, particularly across contracts sensitive to consumer finance or cyclical electronics.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent, stated on CNN News that President Donald Trump has warned trade partners about negotiations reverting to previous levels if not conducted in good faith. There are 18 upcoming deals with key trading partners, though no specific timeline was provided.

Currently, the US Dollar Index (DXY) has decreased by 0.32%, now around 100.75. Tariffs function as customs duties on imports, giving local manufacturers a competitive edge over similar imported products. They are common tools of protectionism, alongside trade barriers and import quotas.

While tariffs and taxes both generate government revenue, they differ fundamentally. Tariffs are paid at import ports, and taxes at the point of purchase. Taxes apply to individuals and businesses, while tariffs are the responsibility of importers.

Divergent Views on Tariffs

There are divergent views among economists on tariffs’ usage. Some advocate for them to protect domestic markets and address trade imbalances, yet others warn they could escalate prices and instigate trade wars. During the presidential campaign for 2024, Trump intends to levy tariffs on Mexico, China, and Canada, which collectively represented 42% of US imports in 2024. Revenue from these tariffs is planned to reduce personal income taxes.

Bessent’s appearance on CNN, while framed in diplomatic language, underscored a strategy that hinges more on pressure than partnership. The message was direct—should any of the impending 18 trade agreements be approached without sincerity, pre-existing terms may simply be reinstated, effectively rolling back negotiations. That places every party on notice: outcomes won’t just be shaped by economic metrics, but also by diplomacy—or the lack of it.

From our standpoint, this is hardly abstract rhetoric. This sort of message directly impacts the currency markets, as we’ve seen with the US Dollar Index dipping 0.32% to 100.75. When political risk increases, the dollar often reflects that increased uncertainty—particularly when policy leans toward protectionism. Movement like this, even if modest, can interrupt models based on stable or appreciating dollar flows.

Now, stepping back to tariffs. Though they’ve existed as tools of trade policy for decades, their implementation today carries far broader implications. At their core, tariffs act as price increases on imports, which in theory makes local alternatives more appealing to buyers. Ideally, this should bolster domestic production. But that textbook outcome clashes with real global supply chains—where few industries function in a purely national ecosystem.

The distinction between tariffs and taxes, while technical, is non-trivial. Tariffs are imposed at national borders and paid by importers, whereas taxes hit end consumers and businesses internally. That means costs introduced by tariffs usually show up upstream in the production process, potentially trickling down to consumers later. What’s different now is that tariffs are being repackaged—as a generator of state funds aimed at offsetting personal income tax, which would normally depend on general economic activity.

Repercussions of Proposed Tariffs

With Trump’s campaign floating the idea of blanket tariffs on imports from Mexico, Canada, and China—countries that made up nearly half of US imports in 2024—those cost implications expand. That’s not just hypothetical. Importers must either accept lower margins or pass those costs along. We can reasonably expect this to ripple outward, particularly for sectors reliant on inputs from these countries, such as electronics, automotive, and agriculture.

There’s no mystery as to why views differ among economists. Some see value in shielding weaker domestic sectors from international competition, particularly those seen as strategically vital. Others argue this serves only to distort prices and provoke retaliation—moves that in the past have throttled trade flows and pressured global GDP. They may look at precedence from post-2008 or earlier historical periods when tit-for-tat measures reduced global volume instead of spurring growth.

From where we’re sitting, these are not passive events. They shape hedging strategies, trading spreads, and even volatility assumptions. With that in mind, currency and rate derivatives traders need to recalibrate for an administration that seems intent on excising leverage from its counterparts during negotiation rounds.

It’s worth noting too that while no dates have been attached to the 18 deals mentioned by Bessent, preparation windows for repricing exposures are extremely narrow once announcements start. Positioning based on historical trade relationships could become dated quickly if disagreements surface. For now, the messaging from Washington implies that predictability is not the goal. Instead, flexibility and pressure seem to be the preferred tools.

If these policy outlines mature into formal mechanisms—particularly the use of tariff proceeds to offset income taxes—we could find ourselves operating within a model not seen since the early 20th century: trade duties funding domestic relief. That introduces a structural shift to watch closely across multilateral trading systems, especially for participants whose models have assumed relatively stable taxation mechanisms and relatively open import channels.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

An official from China’s National Bureau of Statistics mentioned that the country’s economy is maintaining steady growth under current pressures. Productivity demand is rising, and the employment situation remains stable.

Despite facing challenges, the economy continues on an upward path of development. China is working to diversify and expand trade with countries part of the Belt and Road initiative.

Economic Growth Trends

Recent data from April show China’s industrial output increased by 6.1% compared to the previous year, surpassing the expected 5.5% but falling from a previous 7.7%. Meanwhile, China’s apparent oil demand dropped by 5.6% year-on-year in April.

The report from the National Bureau of Statistics points to a trend that, while not without bumps, still offers some reassurance. Growth is edging upward, modestly but consistently. Employment hasn’t slipped too far from targets. Notably, there’s activity aiming to build more robust trading ties — specifically through routes aligned with the Belt and Road scheme. That push helps to prop up resilience beyond domestic levers alone, even as internal consumption patterns stay in flux.

Industrial numbers from April reveal something worth watching. Output rose more than anticipated, reaching 6.1% on a year-over-year basis. Expectations had been for a 5.5% increase, so surpassing that may suggest manufacturing is trying to pick up pace again. However, the step back from March’s 7.7% leans in the other direction. That dip indicates that while the factory floor remains active, momentum isn’t building in a straight line. There’s a regular pulse, but it’s still skipping a beat from time to time.

Simultaneously, oil demand offers a contrasting message. It dropped over 5% in the same month, suggesting either inventory is in place or activity in some industrial corners is cooling. That sort of decline doesn’t usually align with a hot economy. It signals caution when looking at sectors heavily tied to fuel — especially transport, construction, and machinery-heavy production. There might also be a structural or seasonal shift at play, such as businesses tightening operations ahead of a new quarter.

Adjusting Strategies

From where we sit, this mix tells us to act with care. The divergence between rising output and falling energy consumption should raise eyebrows. One upswing doesn’t confirm a broader turn, particularly when vital commodities are pointing lower. Equally, any strategies leaning heavily on raw materials should be reassessed in light of this energy drag. It does not suggest weakness in all corners, but there’s less certainty about sustained demand across the board.

Following the data, it’s fair to expect that positions tied to commodities linked to industrial performance — particularly those involving energy consumption proxies — may need some adjustment. Hedging exposure more actively or reassessing expiration dates towards the end of the summer could provide a buffer. Volatility tied to trade connections might flare up again, especially as new deals or policy tweaks emerge from Belt and Road partners.

The pullback in apparent oil demand also suggests traders review sectors sensitive to fuel imports or logistics constraints. If reduced consumption persists through May, long-side exposure to refinery margins or maritime transport would be vulnerable. That sort of undercurrent doesn’t always reverse quickly. Better to stay slightly left of risk rather than caught in a rush to rebalance later on.

It’s also worth noting that although the industrial data outperformed forecasts, the gap between market expectations and results is narrowing, not widening. That tells us that analysts are recalibrating pace, not calling for dramatic climbs. For volatility exposure, that might mean more movement at the edges — smaller bursts, rather than sweeping swings.

Where policy stays supportive and export pipelines remain unclogged, we’ll look for indicators showing which sector decouples most. Our focus is where the data bends — not just where it breaks. For now, weights should shift gradually, not blindly.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.