Crude oil stocks decreased by 2.032 million barrels, differing from the expected decrease of 0.833 million. The private API data showed a larger reduction of 4.49 million barrels.

Gasoline stocks showed an increase of 0.188 million barrels, contrary to the expected reduction of 1.600 million barrels. Distillates saw a reduction of 1.107 million barrels, slightly less than the projected draw of 1.271 million.

Market Analysis

In the market, API crude oil is trading at $58.62, down by $0.46. It previously reached a high of $60.22 and a low of $58.59. The price is nearing the 100-hour moving average of $58.26. Earlier, it surpassed the 200-hour moving average, which is now at $59.70. Additionally, it moved beyond the 50% midpoint of the drop from the 23 April high, positioned at $60.08. Momentum at the midpoint and the resistance level of $60 decreased quickly.

The release of the crude oil inventory figures shows a steeper drawdown than analysts had pencilled in. Instead of the 0.833 million barrel drop that many were anticipating, the official data came in at just over two million. Even that, however, is still far below what the API had reported the day before, with their figures showing a draw of more than twice that amount. Immediately, that suggests that the market was bracing for a tighter supply scenario than what eventually made its way into the official report.

At the same time, petrol inventories recorded a small build—not only did that defy the anticipated removal from storage, but it also followed a prior week where usage had appeared to lift. That addition to supply, even if modest in volume, is informing current trader positioning where demand is concerned. The drop in distillate stocks was fairly in line but came in just below the forecast, offering slightly less support to bullish pressures from that category.

We’re seeing a very technical phase in price action. The contract is hovering just above key short-term levels, notably the 100-hour average, which lately has been drawing tighter as volatility drops from recent highs. Previously, it managed to surpass both the longer 200-hour average and the midpoint of the recent downside move that began in late April. That’s given way to weaker follow-through, particularly around the $60 threshold, where selling interest returned abruptly.

Trading Implications

In the short term, it would make sense to remain sensitive to any price rejections near recent resistance points, especially as upward movement loses steam around well-observed levels such as the prior Fibonacci midpoint. The softness appearing there reflects a fading momentum and diminishing willingness to buy strength.

Volume has also been thinning in those higher ranges, which tends to amplify reversals near resistance zones. Prices pausing so close to structural areas—like moving averages and retracement percentages—should never be taken as neutral; we should treat them as signals of hesitation. These hesitations often expose temporary imbalances between expectation and inventory reality, which tends to show up quickest in near-month futures.

Should we see prices slip back below the 100-hour average, one possible route is further probing downsides, especially if builds in petrol continue or if upcoming data illustrate softening consumption patterns. Any recovery rally will need to do more than test $60 now—it has to close above it and carry volume, or the move risks another stall.

The API versus official report discrepancy remains a short-term variable, but not one to anchor bias onto. Disparities like this tend to correct within days, either by confirming tighter draws in subsequent releases or being muddied by revised data flows. For us, what’s more telling is where the market starts selling, and how quickly it does so. That’s been at levels just north of $60—and that’s not gone unnoticed.

As we watch how storage levels develop, particularly for refined products, energy contracts may begin to lean further into changes in regional balances and refinery metrics. The sharp ice between realised data and priced assumptions usually doesn’t last long. The adjustments that follow often bring about productive opportunities for those prepared to react based on price, not predisposition.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The EUR/USD pair is consolidating near 1.1360, poised at a critical point within a symmetrical triangle. Current price action is close to potentially breaching the triangle’s pattern, marking an important juncture for the currency pair’s trend direction.

European data shows a mixed economic landscape, with Germany’s factory orders increasing by 3.6% in March, surpassing the projected 1.3%. Despite this positive note from Germany and a favourable current account from France, weak retail sales in Italy and the Eurozone have constrained the Euro’s momentum.

Federal Reserve Decision Anticipation

In the US, attention is fixed on the upcoming Federal Reserve decision. While no change in policy is expected, the tone of Fed Chair Powell’s statement could influence US Dollar movements, affecting EUR/USD’s immediate course.

The EUR/USD is currently trading just below its 20-day Simple Moving Average. The Relative Strength Index suggests neutral momentum, with a breakout above 1.1400 indicating a potential rise, and a drop below 1.1240 suggesting a possible decline.

Monitoring the 1.1400-1.1240 range is key as Fed Chair Powell’s remarks could drive increased market volatility. Price movements in this range can offer clues to the EUR/USD’s next directional move.

Market Volatility and Triangle Formation

The EUR/USD pair, hovering near the apex of its symmetrical triangle formation around 1.1360, suggests markets are gearing up for a directional shift. This pattern tends to compress until a breakout becomes more likely than not, and with volatility appearing somewhat muted for now, the likelihood of a sharper move coming soon increases. Movements above 1.1400 or below 1.1240 may indicate that the period of choppy consolidation has come to an end.

Germany’s factory figures, outpacing expectations, provided a brief tailwind. A 3.6% rise in orders hints at underlying industrial stability, though it stands in contrast to softer demand indicators emerging from Italy’s retail channels and broader Eurozone consumption. The mixed batch of numbers, while offering certain pockets of strength, does little to generate any consistent Euro buying pressure. The contrast between robust German orders and weak consumer activity elsewhere has left us short of conviction on the Euro’s near-term direction.

As Europe balances between economic bright spots and soft patches, focus shifts heavily toward the US. With the Federal Reserve’s upcoming meeting unlikely to announce new policy measures, the spotlight turns to Powell’s tone. Over recent months, markets have become increasingly sensitive to nuances in forward-looking language, and even subtle shifts in emphasis can push traders decisively into one trade or out of another. Powell’s remarks will be dissected not only for what is said but what is implied in the omissions or hesitations.

We are currently seeing levels below the 20-day SMA, which has flattened. This reflects indecision and a balance in buying and selling pressures. The RSI not diverging in any direction underscores the lack of strong conviction in this market, reinforcing that we remain stuck in a range with limited directional cues.

The 1.1400 and 1.1240 boundaries are now our guideposts. Moves beyond either range edge may not only mark a shift in daily bias but may trigger algorithmic or option-related flows, adding fuel to any breakout. That makes Powell’s messaging highly relevant—not as a trigger for actual policy shifts, but as a catalyst for market positioning and sentiment recalibration.

Momentum-based strategies should be held at the ready but remain on the sidelines for now. In these conditions, a reactive approach based on confirmed moves rather than anticipation provides more clarity. Watching the triangle’s support and resistance edges closely, particularly in conjunction with Powell’s speaking schedule, offers the cleanest view of what may drive positioning in the days ahead.

Volumes have remained stable, neither depressed nor exuberant, implying liquidity exists for directional positions should a breakout occur. However, patience remains a virtue in this context.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

USDCHF has been trading within a confined range for the past 11 days, with the upper limit set between 0.8265–0.8277. The momentum above the 100- and 200-hour moving averages has consistently diminished, showing a tendency for selling pressure.

Since mid-April, the market has formed a sideways range, with support holding firm between 0.8195 and 0.8212 during multiple tests. The ceiling during this period has been between 0.8318 and 0.8333, with brief surges above the moving averages showing limited strength.

Key Levels To Monitor

Key levels to monitor include resistance points at 0.8254, the 100 and 200-hour moving averages, and 0.8318 – 0.8333 at the high end of the trading range. Support can be seen between 0.8195–0.8212 over the last 11 days and further below at 0.8097 – 0.8128, near the 2025 low of 0.8039.

To reverse current trends, USDCHF requires a sustained breach above the recent ceiling and moving averages. Until such a move occurs, sellers maintain the upper hand, and the risk of downward movement into the lower support zones remains prevalent.

What we’ve been seeing with USDCHF over the last fortnight is a market that’s hesitating rather than committing to a direction. After mid-April’s sideways motion started to stabilise, the pair has spent most of its time bouncing between clearly defined boundaries, without any sharp breach that could offer momentum traders a reason to act decisively.

Let’s talk about what’s actually happening here: upward moves do take place, but every time price nudges above the short-term averages, buyers fizzle out almost instantly. This repeated failure to accelerate when above those references is more than just hesitation—it’s a cue for us to read the order flow as one-sided. Those averages aren’t acting as springboards right now; they’re behaving more like loose ceilings—flexing, but not breaking.

Market Resistance And Support

The top of this range, the 0.8318 to 0.8333 region, isn’t just where resistance kicks in. It’s become the market’s way of saying “enough”. Rejections have been swift, always followed by a retreat back into the range, often with increased volume on the way down.

Meanwhile, the floor at 0.8195 to 0.8212 has done an admirable job of holding back sellers. Stability at that zone ought to reflect stronger buying interest. Yet the longer we loiter just above it without making any real recovery attempts, the less reliable it becomes in deterring future breaches.

Now, for those operating in price-sensitive instruments, the priority is not predicting a breakout but dealing with what the data implies. Until we see a proper and prolonged push above both the 100- and 200-hour barriers—preferably closing beyond the top of the range with volume—we treat bounces as opportunities for short entries, not long positioning.

Looking elsewhere, that lower cushion between 0.8097 and 0.8128 now deserves increased attention. Not because it’s stronger—it isn’t—but because if price stumbles below the short-term floor, that zone will be the obvious magnet. It’s also uncomfortably close to the early-year trough at 0.8039, a level that once triggered disorderly moves.

It’s worth pointing out that we haven’t seen real conviction in either direction. But the weight of evidence—fading pushes higher, frequent tests of the base, and a lack of impulsive buying—leans towards bear control. Until new information forces a re-evaluation, we manage risk with the assumption that strength will be sold, and weakness could gather speed once the nearest supports give way.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Two decades ago, a technical analysis principle suggested that accumulation periods lead to uptrends, while distribution periods precede downtrends. This principle indicates that the size of these periods often relates to the subsequent market movements, illustrating connections between trends.

The VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has been forming a base for twelve years, needing recovery after declining from 2011 highs. A realistic price target, based on Fibonacci extensions, sets the first objective just below $91, pending a breakout above $66 on monthly closures.

The Travelers Companies and Fibonacci Levels

The Travelers Companies (TRV) adheres to Fibonacci levels from the 2008 market shifts. A significant move occurred when TRV bottomed in March 2020 near a Fibonacci extension, leading to a strong uptrend. TRV experienced resistance around $155, which later turned into robust support, indicating an ongoing rise with a long-term target around $358.

The iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) had a trend reversal after an uptrend from March 2020 to October 2024. During this rise, two trendlines provided support, but a 2024 RSI bearish divergence suggested waning momentum. By early 2025, a break below these trendlines confirmed a market structure shift, now consolidating near $88.80, indicating possible further declines.

This article touches on foundational technical analysis—accumulation leading to growth phases and distribution preceding falling prices. Essentially, when a market or asset quietly builds strength over time—without rapid price changes—it’s often preparing for an upward move. And when it sees wide interest or is heavily sold off, it may be near a peak or preparing for decline. These phases are not arbitrary; their depth and duration tend to reflect the strength and length of the moves that follow.

Chart Patterns and Market Signals

The chart pattern forming in GDXJ is lengthy—twelve years of basing behaviour. That’s not minor. A base of this duration, if resolved to the upside, often leads to extended directional moves. The ETF saw a broad decline from the 2011 highs, gradually moving sideways instead of rebounding quickly, giving the impression of a long-term reset process. What matters most now is whether price can maintain a sustained break above the $66 level on monthly closes. That needs to be the benchmark. Only then could the $91 area, a Fibonacci-projected level, come into reach. Until then, any short-term increases lack proper conviction. We must also be mindful of false breakouts which commonly occur near structurally important thresholds.

As for TRV, the trajectory since the 2020 lows has been methodical. Pivoting near an extended Fibonacci level—calculated from movements that began around the 2008 downturn—the price found a floor and reversed with trend-following strength. Throughout its climb, resistance was met around $155. This level later flipped and started acting as support, which isn’t just encouraging—it’s quite instructional. That swap in function marks strong acceptance of higher valuation. With price now making calculated gains, the larger pattern implies a long climb toward the previously discussed Fibonacci projection at $358. That’s a long journey, but price structures remain intact. We’ve observed consistent re-tests and support at higher levels; unless those give way, trend followers can remain engaged with risk plans structured around past reaction zones.

Turning to ITB, there’s been a different kind of shift. The ETF’s rise from the pandemic low has run into structural changes. Specifically, while price advanced steadily over several years—respecting trendlines and maintaining momentum—it began to lose pace as 2024 ended. The RSI, which helps track participation and strength, failed to confirm new highs late in the move. That divergence was early notice that buying strength might be weakening. Soon after, price pierced key trendlines—a break that lacked ambiguity. That action often precedes correction or sideways phases. The current trading zone near $88.80 is not a random mark—that level corresponds with recent support and consolidation during Q1 2025. Current price compression implies indecision rather than reversal, but trendline breaks tend to have lingering effects. Here, we’d treat rallies toward old support zones as potential retests rather than calls for enthusiasm.

Now, when relating all three instruments, we notice a theme. Longer-term Fibonacci calculations and structural breaks are mapping price expectations with more precision than legacy fundamental models. And when we, as derivatives participants, account for that—rather than react emotionally to headlines—we manage both exposure and timing with improved edge. What becomes productive over the next few weeks is watching monthly and weekly closes. Are assets respecting levels drawn from previous multi-year pivots? Are structure changes being confirmed by volume or RSI behaviour? If not, caution is warranted. If so, leverage and expiry positioning can be adjusted to reflect the higher conviction signal.

Ultimately, the message is neither bullish nor bearish—it’s conditional. It depends entirely on whether long-term technical areas are confirmed or rejected. And we act based on what the market actually tells us each week.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The USD/JPY pair rebounded to approximately 143.30, ending a three-day decline. This rise was attributed to the Japanese Yen’s weaker performance, as its safe-haven appeal lessened following confirmation of upcoming trade talks between the US and China in Switzerland.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer announced they would meet Chinese counterparts to discuss economic matters. These talks are aimed at easing the trade tensions rather than securing a comprehensive deal.

Impact On Safe Haven Demand

This development is perceived as a step towards resolving the trade war, reducing demand for safe-haven assets like the JPY. Despite this, the Yen had previously enjoyed demand due to uncertainties over the US-China trade outlook.

Domestically, there’s scepticism about the Bank of Japan raising interest rates, given current global economic uncertainties. Concurrently, the US Dollar is trading around 99.40 in anticipation of the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy announcement.

According to the CME FedWatch tool, traders expect the Fed to maintain interest rates between 4.25%-4.50%. The focus will be on the Fed’s guidance for the year’s remaining monetary policy rather than any immediate rate changes.

We’ve seen USD/JPY snap back to around 143.30 after three consecutive sessions of decline—largely a reaction to diminishing Yen demand rather than any pronounced strength in the Dollar itself. The shift stemmed from easing market anxiety after the announcement of trade discussions set to take place in Switzerland between top American and Chinese officials. Bessent and Greer will be representing Washington, with economic questions on the table but no expectation for a sweeping trade resolution.

Market Expectations And Strategic Considerations

What this has done is reduce the drag that safe-haven flows typically exert on USD/JPY. Notably, the JPY had been bid up previously due to persistent uncertainty in relations between the two largest global economies. A simple acknowledgement that dialogue is in motion was sufficient to unwind some of those defensive positions, especially among macro-focused desks reacting to headline-sensitive sentiment rotations.

At home, Japanese interest rate expectations remain subdued. With economic data providing no solid case for a policy shift and inflation struggling to become self-reinforcing, there’s little appetite domestically to pull away from yield-curve control. This muted outlook for Japan’s monetary stance keeps the downside for USD/JPY fairly well supported, barring external shocks.

On the US side, all eyes now shift to the upcoming policy signals from the Federal Open Market Committee. The Dollar index holding near 99.40 suggests a market that is hesitant to place large directional wagers ahead of the next decision. As per the CME FedWatch tool, the baseline expectation is that rates will stay in the 4.25%-4.50% range. Thus, the bulk of price action will likely hinge on the character and tone of Powell’s forward guidance.

For those of us engaged in options or futures around USD/JPY, attention should rest squarely on implied volatility into next week. With the Fed decision approaching and geopolitical surprises always a risk, front-end vol could see sharp repricing. It may be prudent to look at risk reversals or calendar spreads if directional conviction is limited but a view on timing is clearer.

Additionally, the softening JPY should not be treated as an all-clear for aggressive carry strategies just yet. Rate differentials still favour Dollar strength, but markets tend to reprice aggressively if Fed rhetoric introduces dovish elements. Should Powell signal that policy is peaking, even without confirming cuts, expect Dollar longs—particularly those in momentum-driven hands—to reduce exposure steadily.

We find that hedging short Yen exposure out two to three weeks could be more important than chasing further Dollar upside at this point, particularly as trader positioning enters a more binary phase heading into summer. Better to stay nimble than overcommitted into a stretch of slower macro data and policy re-evaluation.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The EU is set to announce a provisional list of tariffs against the US on Thursday. These tariffs will be enforced if trade talks with the US do not succeed.

The EU’s proposed list targets approximately €100 billion in annual US imports, including Boeing aircraft. This step is viewed as a potential response to ongoing US tariffs.

Approval from EU member states is necessary before any measures can be implemented. The list is expected to be shared imminently but may see revisions.

Trade Tactics In Focus

This announcement serves as a formal warning rather than immediate enforcement, underscoring the EU’s intention to pressure Washington ahead of trade discussions. The inclusion of high-value imports like aircraft is not arbitrary—such items have layered importance for industries reliant on transatlantic supply chains, and Washington is unlikely to overlook the selection.

By preparing these measures in advance of any firm breakdown in negotiations, Brussels is taking a pre-emptive stance. It’s a pointed signal: should talks not achieve mutually acceptable terms, reciprocal tariffs are fully prepared and can be triggered without delay. It also means that market participants, including those involved in pricing risk and volatility across commodities sectors tied to US-Europe trade, must factor in an additional layer of uncertainty.

The emphasis on obtaining backing from individual EU governments also matters. It reflects both a procedural necessity and a political test: there needs to be unity within the bloc before more concrete steps can follow. That backing isn’t always automatic, particularly for measures that affect high-consumption goods or sectors where member states have divergent interests. As a result, the presentation of the draft list is merely the start of a longer process that could reshape expectations in coming sessions.

Markets And Political Pressure

Given that the draft list affects €100 billion of goods annually, this opens considerable scope for price adjustments in currency pairs and options exposed to sectors such as aerospace, machinery, and commercial transport. We’ve already seen sensitivity in contracts that price future growth differentials between the eurozone and US economies; now the focus may rotate towards products more directly sensitive to trade restrictions.

For us, the immediate focus shifts not on whether the tariffs will be enforced, but how markets may reprice their assumptions as the political calendar proceeds. If the EU signals even limited internal resistance to the list, one could reasonably expect short-term repositioning in rate-sensitive trades or a modest recalibration in cross-border equities exposure. Seasoned observers will know to watch for signs of temporary volatility, particularly in forward-rate agreements and swaps that embed risk beyond the standard policy-related movements.

The risk here isn’t around an announcement alone—it’s embedded in when and how quickly corporate leadership on both sides of the Atlantic begins to readjust trade assumptions. This makes hedging strategies for large-cap importers or export-reliant industrials a topic we can’t postpone. In FX derivatives specifically, some desks may observe greater demand for short-term hedges against sharp movements triggered by media soundbites or government briefings.

In truth, we’ve been here before. The intent this time feels more structured, the tactics less reactive. When a basket worth €100 billion is used as a reference point, it tends to shape trading volumes across more than one asset class. Being ahead of that repricing—that’s the difference between managing dislocation and reacting to it. Traders need to translate political actions into practical positioning.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

CarvanaCo (NYSE:CVNA) has experienced a strong recovery following a 98% drop between 2021 and 2022. The stock bounced back with an 8000% surge from $3.62 to $292, followed by a correction to $142 before entering what could be its next growth phase.

CVNA’s bullish momentum is depicted by its Elliott Wave structure, with the potential for further gains targeting a Fibonacci extension range of $437 – $505. This presents opportunities to engage with CVNA through the Elliott Wave strategy by entering positions after specific corrective sequences.

Federal Reserve Interest Rate Update

The Federal Reserve recently maintained interest rates within the 4.25%-4.50% range, influencing market behavior. This decision affected the EUR/USD, keeping it near the 1.1350 level, and pressured the GBP/USD towards 1.3330 as the US Dollar strengthened.

Gold remained steady, hovering just below $3,400 per troy ounce, amid easing trade tensions. Cryptocurrencies such as Tron, NEO, VeChain, and Conflux saw slight gains, while OKB experienced a minor dip.

Trading in foreign exchange markets involves high risk, as leverage can amplify both profits and losses. Individuals considering FX trading should assess their investment goals, experience, and risk tolerance carefully.

Cvana Stock Performance and Opportunities

The initial content outlines a substantial rebound in CVNA’s stock following a catastrophic fall the year prior. After plummeting nearly entirely—by as much as 98%—the company staged an astonishing return. From a low of $3.62, it shot up 8000% to just under $300 before cooling off. We’ve since seen a pullback to $142. Such retracements are not rare, particularly in assets that have seen speculative or accelerated buying. For those analysing waves and patterns, particularly within the Elliott Wave framework, the current structure hints at further upside if the current retracement unfolds as expected.

Should the correction form into a classic three-wave ABC pattern, that may provide a technically-favourable re-entry point with targets potentially reaching the next Fibonacci resistance range between $437 and $505. This is dependent on continuation behaviour and confirmation on lower timeframes. It’s less about blind faith and more about adhering to rules-based triggers.

From a broader perspective, the Federal Reserve’s decision to keep interest rates steadied between 4.25% and 4.50% added a layer of resistance to certain major pairs. For instance, the EUR/USD has been buoyed close to 1.1350—not materially breaching either direction as the dollar firmed modestly. Sterling, as seen in the GBP/USD, was pushed back towards the 1.3330 threshold, reflecting modest dollar inflows rather than structural weakness in the pound.

Gold, which often acts as a liquid hedge, lingered around the $3,400 level, moving within a relatively calm band. The easing in tariff-related uncertainty did not create urgency in either direction—perhaps due to already priced-in assumptions or fatigue among metals traders.

We also noticed minor moves in the digital market. While assets like Tron and VeChain posted incremental gains, OKB saw a mild retracement. This divergence between tokens may not necessarily stem from fundamental differences, but rather liquidity conditions or positioning imbalances across major exchanges.

As for leveraged instruments like foreign exchange derivatives, they remain double-edged. There’s amplification in reward, yes, but losses compound equally. That makes clarity in strategy and well-defined exposure parameters more important than ever. When assessing near-term opportunities, it’s less about chasing headlines and more about waiting for setups to materialise with discipline at the forefront.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The USD is stronger against the three major currency pairs at the start of the US session. The US and China are set to meet in Switzerland to discuss trade, indicating a potential easing of tensions. However, the negotiation process is predicted to be lengthy.

The Federal Reserve will hold a meeting today with no expected change in interest rates. Attention will be on Fed Chair Powell’s remarks and the FOMC statement. For June, there is a 30% chance anticipated for a rate cut of 25 basis points.

Us Stocks Gaining

US stocks are showing gains after two days of declines. The Dow Industrial Average increases by 264 points, the S&P rises by 32 points, and the Nasdaq gains 115 points.

In the US debt market, yields are slightly higher with the 2-year yield at 3.815%, the 5-year at 3.920%, the 10-year at 4.323%, and the 30-year at 4.801%.

In other markets, crude oil is up by $0.60 or 1.03%. Gold decreases by $48 or 1.42%, and silver is down by $0.26 or 0.83%. Bitcoin experiences an increase of $173, bringing it to $96,987.

What we’ve just seen is a firm start for the dollar this session, gaining ground against the most traded currency pairs. Strength here generally reflects either a shift in risk appetite or expectations around interest rate policy. In this case, both are playing a part.

Talks between Washington and Beijing are scheduled in Switzerland, offering a glimmer of optimism around ongoing trade friction. However, the process will almost certainly take time, and there is little in the way of short-term resolutions expected. Even if dialogue is open, it’s reasonable to view progress as a slow drip. For positioning around commodity-linked or export-sensitive currencies, it would be prudent to avoid assuming swift outcomes. We’re choosing to stay reactive, not predictive, in this particular area.

The Fed And Interest Rates

The Fed is not expected to touch rates during the meeting today—no surprises here. What keeps us watching, though, are Powell’s remarks and the language of the accompanying statement. With a 30% probability being priced in for a June cut, the tone today could directly impact short-end rates and implied volatility. The more dovish the language, the more re-pricing we could see in forward contracts. A surprising change in emphasis could catch short positions off guard.

Equities are on the rebound after two sessions in the red. The fact that major indices are pushing higher indicates that investors remain tentatively optimistic, possibly banking on softer central bank language or seeing recent moves as oversold. For us, it’s precautionary rather than euphoric—stock movements like these often lack conviction unless underpinned by strong data or a clear catalyst.

Yield curves are flattening a touch, though all tenors are posting mild increases. Two-year notes sit just under 3.82%, while the 30-year Treasury is holding close to 4.80%. These changes are small but could prove relevant for rate-sensitive spreads. Anyone placing trades based on near-term monetary expectations should notice how carefully rates are creeping up without triggering moves in risk assets. There’s a degree of disconnect here that’s worth watching.

Commodities are a mixed bag. Oil is nudging upwards, but with such a modest move, it hardly demands a rotation. Instead, it reflects broader volatility in demand assumptions. Gold has come off sharply—$48 lower represents a clear retreat from recent strength, and suggests some unwinding of hedge flows linked to geopolitics or inflation. Silver, as it often does, is merely echoing this. In the short-term, precious metals appear open to further downside if real yields climb or if Fed commentary surprises toward the hawkish side.

Bitcoin is extending gains, now trading above $96,000. This could simply be a spillover of broader risk on sentiment, but more likely it’s a function of market participants reaching for yield—or at least perceived momentum—in a week lacking heavyweight data. Either way, it’s not the move itself, but the context behind it that helps steer positioning. We’re watching how other correlated risk assets respond for early confirmation.

Right now, we’re standing in the middle of several moving parts—but each is giving enough clarity to steer directional bias. The key is to avoid overstaying trades tied to in-between sentiment shifts, particularly where volatility remains calculated but reactive.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Euro is consolidating within a tight range in the mid/upper 1.13s. Data releases showed euro area retail sales in line with expectations, with a 0.1% contraction in March, while German factory orders exceeded expectations, and French wage growth accelerated in Q1.

The ECB maintains a dovish stance, with indications of continued rate cuts despite last week’s CPI surprise. US/EU trade developments remain mixed, with ongoing discussions on retaliatory tariffs and proposals for US LNG purchases and direct US investments.

Market Information And Investment Advice

Market information may contain forward-looking statements with associated risks and uncertainties. Instruments profiled are for informational purposes and should not be seen as recommendations for buying or selling assets. Thorough research is necessary before making investment decisions.

No guarantee is made that the information is error-free or timely. Investing carries risks, including potential total loss of investment and emotional distress. Errors and omissions are excepted, and liability for any resulting damages from the use of information is disclaimed.

The author and sources mentioned are not registered investment advisors. The article does not provide personalised investment advice nor suggest business relationships with mentioned companies.

With the Euro remaining within a narrow range, just under the 1.14 mark, it’s now apparent that upward momentum is lacking decisive follow-through. That the euro area’s March retail sales figure arrived as expected—with a minor 0.1% contraction—suggests that consumer demand remains tepid. While not deeply worrying on its own, when seen alongside accelerating French wage growth, it raises questions about disposable income not translating into output.

Germany’s stronger-than-forecast factory orders provide some relief. It was a slightly stronger outcome, hinting that industrial resilience remains intact despite weak consumption. That doesn’t necessarily mean a directional shift for the broader macro picture, but rather that the region offers contradictory signals that are unlikely to force monetary policy changes in the near term.

Central Bank Policy And Trade Developments

From the central bank’s side, Lagarde continues to steer expectations toward easing, even after sticky inflation showed up in last week’s surprise CPI reading. This posture remains consistent—they appear committed to signalling future rate reductions to support underlying economic softness. If inflation stays above ideal levels, earlier guidance may turn out to be less reliable. That disconnect between market expectations and pledged actions could drive unexpected volatility.

Against this backdrop, the back-and-forth in US-EU trade matters adds shaky external pressure. While talks around LNG purchases and transatlantic tariffs may seem peripheral, they inject uncertainty into certain commodities-related positions and offer added noise to broader market functioning. Longer-term implications for growth and capital flows aren’t clear—not yet—but language on both sides suggests that friction could continue surfacing across energy and manufacturing sectors.

In light of these layered developments, we are recalibrating focus towards near-dated rate expectations and their impact on volatility compression. Option skews are reflecting hesitation from one-week to one-month tenor, while gamma remains reactive to data-driven gaps. This means shorter expiries may continue to underprice actual realised movement, especially around scheduled macro releases in Germany and France.

The trading strategy involves fading rallies nearing 1.1450 and buying downside vol when intraday ranges contract to below 40 pips. In other words, lean on asymmetry in short-term moves that diverge from implied volatility readings. Monitoring open interest around options expiry dates reflects a build-up of positions clustering at 1.1350 and 1.1450, indicating both resistance and demand for protection at either edge.

Meanwhile, carry trades against the Euro may retain some appeal with a dovish tone persisting, but the margins narrow when dollar strength feeds into Fed hawkishness. Futures spreads between the ECB and Fed outlooks keep offering tradable divergence if approached with caution around central bank commentary windows.

We continue adjusting exposure based on divergence between forward rates and actual issuance demand. Watching issuance calendars and bond auction performance remains a useful lens into flight-to-quality moves that might be disguised under light volume periods. Carry remains at risk when duration buying increases—timing will matter more than positioning.

What we’ve seen is a data environment that provides just enough fuel for FX volatility, but not enough for conviction in large directional bets. Stay aware of rate cut pricing mismatches and skew moves, as those tend to move faster than spot in response to changes in outcomes.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

There is a strong anticipation surrounding the first trade deal, which is expected to influence interest rate expectations significantly.

For the Fed, there is a 99% probability of no change, with rates at 78 basis points (bps). The European Central Bank has a 92% probability of a rate cut, bringing rates to 62 bps. The Bank of England is at a 91% probability for a rate cut, with rates at 94 bps.

Central Bank Probabilities

The Bank of Canada is less certain, showing a 54% probability of a rate cut and rates at 48 bps. The Reserve Bank of Australia has a 97% probability of a rate cut, bringing rates to 110 bps. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand is at 67% probability for a rate cut, with rates at 72 bps.

The Swiss National Bank is seeing a 99% probability of a rate cut, with rates at 44 bps. The Bank of Japan is likely to remain unchanged, with a 97% probability and rates at 10 bps.

The SNB’s position is influenced by recent dovish comments and lower-than-expected Swiss inflation data. The first trade deal is anticipated to impact these interest rate expectations, especially for the Fed in 2025.

Current pricing shows that rate expectations have shifted firmly toward cuts across most major central banks. These probabilities aren’t just numbers floating in a vacuum – they reflect real trades made on the basis of central bank commentary, inflation prints, and, lately, trade developments that we’ve monitored daily. What’s clear is that global monetary policy is entering a more accommodative stance, not on the margins but quite visibly, and the market has not hesitated to reflect that.

Monetary Policy Trends

Powell’s position remains consistent with a long pause, and at 78 bps, we’re seeing interest rate traders fully factoring in no immediate change in June. However, that doesn’t mean complacency. The emphasis has subtly shifted towards what could materialise in the first quarter of next year. With U.S. data showing gradual moderation, there’s little incentive for abrupt moves, but we’re not ignoring the sensitivity to inflation surprises. Any hint of sticky pricing or labour market resilience could temporarily shake current positioning.

Lagarde’s situation appears more straightforward. With a 92% chance of a cut and pricing at 62 bps, traders have already taken the view that weaker demand across the eurozone justifies action. The energy base effects have worn off, and the current inflation trajectory supports an easing bias. Those with existing euro exposure would do well to consider whether to hold onto short-end receivers for now or start trimming, depending on exposure to periphery curve steepening.

At Threadneedle Street, pricing has leaned in the same direction, mirroring Frankfurt’s expected move. At 91% probability and 94 bps, the expectation is nearly baked in. What drove this? Softening labour market reports and surprisingly dovish MPC commentary. The key focus for the next fortnight will be wage data and services CPI – both likely to steer rate cut timing but not upend the broader path. Sterling rates traders have shown restraint, and it’s justified. That said, we’re watching the August meeting closely, as market breathers signal more volatility on policy clarity.

Macklem’s position is less tidy. The pricing suggests a near toss-up on whether the BoC will cut, with probabilities sitting at 54%. The CAD curve has adjusted somewhat chaotically over the past week as inflation beat marginally but remained within anticipated bounds if you adjust for volatile components. Still, traders would be wise to watch Canadian housing data and core CPI revisions very closely. These pose a risk to forwards currently pricing a mild downtrend into autumn. Those long duration up north may be running slightly ahead of policy signals.

Over in Sydney, Lowe’s successor inherits a rate environment easily swayed by external factors. With the market expressing a 97% chance of easing and current pricing at 110 bps, it’s an open secret that the RBA is viewed as behind the curve. Australia’s recent retail sales slump and falling consumer expectations have fuelled this. Even so, cross-market positioning in rates has not aligned with the same energy as the ECB or BoE trade yet – meaning there’s still scope for relative value to be captured across AUD versus EUR or GBP structures.

The policy stance from Wellington shows less consensus than Canberra. At 67% probability for a cut and 72 bps on the curve, the RBNZ faces pressure from poor business sentiment and falling construction demand, but its more hawkish legacy tone still lingers in some market corners. We’ve seen index-linked expectations widen marginally, especially on forward inflation, suggesting traders aren’t rushing to heap duration on front books just yet.

Jordan’s path is the clearest of them all – the Swiss bank is practically guaranteed to cut again, with rates at 44 bps. The dovish tone emerging from recent communications aligns with trends seen in both real and headline inflation, and the FX market has responded in kind. We’re seeing only minor optionality priced in for a hold, and no real disagreement on direction. There may be trades unwinding soon as expectations for further cuts consolidate.

Ueda’s bank stands alone, with near-unanimous belief of no imminent move. At 97% and 10 bps flat, there is little on the surface to spark re-pricing. Even the yen’s underperformance has failed to stir much response. Japanese inflation pulses higher for now, but not wide enough to test the BoJ’s patience. Unless wage prints—or imported inflation from weaker exchange rates—begin to shift consistently, derivatives here will likely remain tame.

As for broader implications from the trade deal expected soon: we’re already seeing anticipatory movements, particularly in U.S. rate futures further out the curve. The nature and clarity of the agreement will matter. If it reduces geopolitical uncertainty meaningfully, we could see some curve flattening – especially in markets already pricing monetary easing. There’s no hiding from it. One-off headlines can still shift tactically, but trend conviction in rate cuts is strong where macro data justifies it.

In this environment, we find clarity in volatility. Short-term adjustments have been rapid, but long-dated expectations still hint at inflation normalisation. Traders would do well to calibrate exposure across curves rather than rely on directionality alone. Our desks have seen increased appetite for conditional steepeners, especially in jurisdictions where cuts are priced in with high certainty. Watch the weeklies – they’ll tell you if positioning has gone too far too fast.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.