Dividend Adjustment Notice – May 09 ,2025

Dear Client,

Please note that the dividends of the following products will be adjusted accordingly. Index dividends will be executed separately through a balance statement directly to your trading account, and the comment will be in the following format “Div & Product Name & Net Volume”.

Please refer to the table below for more details:

Dividend Adjustment Notice

The above data is for reference only, please refer to the MT4/MT5 software for specific data.

If you’d like more information, please don’t hesitate to contact info@vtmarkets.com.

The EUR/USD pair recovers above 1.1200 but faces challenges from a strengthening US Dollar

The EUR/USD has climbed above 1.1200, with the US Dollar gaining support due to easing trade tensions. A “major” trade deal between the US and the UK was announced, though 10% tariffs remain in place.

The US Initial Jobless Claims for the week ending May 3 dropped to 228,000, slightly surpassing expectations, whereas the previous week’s figure was 241,000. The insured unemployment rate stayed at 1.2%, while continuing claims reduced by 29,000 to 1.879 million.

Eurozone Economic Outlook

The Euro is pressured as the European Central Bank (ECB) may consider further rate cuts, with concerns about the Eurozone’s economic outlook. However, the ECB hopes inflation will reach the 2% target by the year’s end.

The Euro is traded by 19 EU countries and is the world’s second most traded currency after the US Dollar. In 2022, it made up 31% of foreign exchange transactions, with EUR/USD being the most traded currency pair.

Euro value is influenced by inflation, economic data, and trade balance. High inflation obliges the ECB to raise rates, boosting the Euro. Strong economies encourage investment, while positive trade balances also strengthen a currency.

In recent sessions, the EUR/USD breaking above the 1.1200 level may lead some to assume bullish pressure is building, yet the underlying sentiment is more nuanced. The US Dollar, while appearing to retreat, is actually supported by the easing in trade tensions, particularly those linked to a new agreement between Washington and London. Though the headlines boast about a “major” trade deal, it’s worth taking note that key tariffs weren’t removed. A 10% charge still applies, a clue that the resolution may be more partial than comprehensive. From a pricing perspective, that gives the Dollar some breathing space—less aggressive risk repricing, reduced fear of an all-out trade war.

US Labor Market Resilience

We’ve also had better-than-expected weekly jobless figures out of the US. Initial claims came in noticeably lower at 228,000, briefly defying forecasts. That sort of labour market resilience tends to feed rate stability or even hawkish speculation, depending on other indicators. Continuing claims are retreating too—they’re not nosediving, but they are heading in the right direction with a 29,000 drop. What doesn’t move, perhaps more tellingly, is the insured unemployment rate. Stubbornly fixed at 1.2%, this raises questions about longer-term participation and whether enough Americans are shifting back into full employment fast enough to concern the Fed.

As for the Euro, the mood is less certain. The European Central Bank is no longer holding back its dovish tone. Discussions around further rate cuts have become less speculative and more grounded in data. It’s a reaction, frankly, to growing worry about how the Eurozone might end the quarter. If ECB policymakers are uneasy about reaching their 2% inflation target organically, then further adjustment may be employed mechanically. That expectation alone injects softness into the Euro. Traders dealing strictly in yield differentials would already be factoring it in.

We’re still dealing with a vast and liquid currency here. Trading flows in EUR/USD remain dominant globally, and in 2022 they made up nearly one-third of foreign exchange transactions. That level of volume doesn’t disappear overnight, but the shape of it changes. When the ECB signals cuts while the US leans on job creation and consumer activity, the spread reassessment will widen, leading to an increasingly dollar-favoured bid at key technical junctions.

It’s the subtle push and pull of macroeconomic inputs that matters. Inflation, real or expected, moves policy. If consumer prices climb in Europe unexpectedly, for example, then even a hesitant ECB may pause. That pause—for us—would reframe forward guidance. Policies shift not only because of ECB projections but due to how insights from PMIs, trade balances, or wage data shape those projections. At every inflection point, traders should be reading the ECB not by what they declare outright, but where they hedge their language.

In the weeks ahead, there will probably be conflicting pressures building. Shorter-term traders might need to lean more on timing and less on positioning. Anything that adds weight to the US labour market story—be that CPI surprise or wage growth—will strengthen the greenback. If Eurozone data remains patchy, especially in consumer spending or industrial output, pressure will mount on Frankfurt to act. When that happens, rate differentials become less of a debate and more of a dictate.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

China is contemplating a ban on home pre-sales to mitigate risks and support the property market

China is contemplating a ban on pre-sales of homes, requiring developers to only sell completed properties. This measure is part of a proposed “new model” for real estate development by the central government, with details still being worked out.

Future Land Sales

The potential rule would be applicable solely to future land sales, excluding public housing, granting local governments the flexibility to implement it. The decision aims to reduce housing supply misalignments and prevent further price drops, particularly in smaller cities experiencing sharper downturns.

The pre-sales system in China has led to excessive housing supply and developer debt, causing unfinished projects and mortgage boycotts. In 2021, about 90% of homes were pre-sold, decreasing to 74% in 2023, yet developers still heavily rely on advance payments for cash flow.

Some analysts warn that the ban might worsen funding issues, slow land purchases, and negatively impact new construction and investment. The government has committed to fast-tracking supportive financing mechanisms for this new model, though specifics remain unclear.

April data revealed an 8.7% year-on-year decline in new-home sales by top developers, stressing the need for reform amidst weak demand and U.S. tariffs. Over 30 cities have started trials for completed-home sales, with plans to promote it nationwide by 2025.

What we’ve seen so far is a clear indication that authorities are turning the tide on the traditional method of selling residential property before it’s built—a system that, for years, fuelled an immense development boom but eventually contributed to deep cracks across the sector. The decision to shift how property is bought and sold is not a cosmetic adjustment. Instead, it is a recalibration that could fundamentally change how developers access funds, how cities manage growth, and how buyers assess value.

Impact On Funding And Investments

The proposal is not yet a top-down mandate. Instead, it provides enough room for local authorities to determine how and when to apply it within their jurisdictions. This flexibility allows governments to adjust implementation based on the local appetite for new homes and the financial health of developers in the area. It also limits immediate disruption, though expectations are that this model, once trialled in smaller or pilot cities, could extend more broadly.

Wei’s analysis—that this tighter constraint may deepen funding stress and put off new land acquisition—is substantiated by the fact that a large proportion of projects still rely on the pre-sale mechanism as a vital means of liquidity. The concern is not whether firms will be challenged; rather, it is how many will have sufficient reserves or accessible capital to bridge the cash-flow gap once pre-sales are scaled back further or abolished at the acquisition stage.

Let’s consider the broader impact. For one, the requirement to complete homes before sale draws developers into a more inventory-heavy model. Instead of collecting deposits during early phases of development, they’ll carry certain financial burdens longer while hoping future buyers materialise. This inevitably weeds out smaller or weaker players who lack the balance sheet to weather the delayed revenue.

The move could provide more stability for buyers, given the worry of unfinished homes vanishing into ghost-town status has not disappeared in key provinces. Purchase demand, however, remains tepid, and the April figures point directly to this headwind. New-home sales dropping nearly 9% is not just a margin of error; it is consistent with a broader reluctance among households to reinvest, buy mid-project, or trust delivery terms. With that said, investor sentiment is no longer being driven purely by price discounts or incentives, but rather a deeper reflection on reliability and long-term value.

This is where we must be specific in our timing. Over 30 municipalities are testing completed-home transactions, and the plan to expand that nationwide creates a timeline—most likely culminating around the end of next year—which will now hang over any forward-looking contract, investment, or leveraged position. Financing mechanisms being fast-tracked by the centre may offer temporary relief, but without clarity on rollout, assumptions on government backstops need to be critically examined.

When funding channels tighten and land purchasing slows down simultaneously, developers pivot. That pivot often includes delaying new starts, adjusting pricing models, and offloading assets to maintain solvency—a familiar pattern from previous cycles. Therefore, we anticipate decreased volatility in construction inputs short-term, with a wider spread of risk in local debt instruments.

What matters now is how deeply the policy filters through in the coming quarter and how participant behaviour adapts before that deadline. We should expect positioning to shift quickly if more cities join the test group. Particularly given how quickly property developers have adjusted launches and investment flows in the past once financing patterns visibly changed.

Sentiment in equity-linked metrics and fixed income tied to land banks may see mild correction, particularly where assets under consideration are in regions likely to trial the complete-delivery model sooner. No one is pricing certainty yet; instead, we are watching for pattern shifts. Input costs, interest coverage, and land premiums are now paramount, not secondary.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The March Leading Economic Index for Japan exceeded predictions, recording an actual value of 107.7

Japan’s leading economic index for March exceeded expectations with an actual figure of 107.7, surpassing the anticipated 107.5. This index serves as an indicator of the economic direction, with the March result indicating a robust outlook.

The EUR/USD currency pair maintained a higher position near 1.1250 during Friday’s European session. This movement follows a pause in US Dollar purchases as markets await US-China trade discussions.

Gbp/usd market analysis

The GBP/USD pair remained subdued below 1.3250, even with a deceleration in the US Dollar’s rise. The Bank of England’s cautious stance on future rate cuts contributed to the lack of impact on the Pound.

Gold prices experienced modest gains due to rising geopolitical tensions and a weaker US Dollar. The ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, Middle East tensions, and India-Pakistan disputes are contributing to increased demand for gold as a safe haven.

Ripple’s price settled at around $2.31 after news of a potential $50 million settlement with the SEC. This development was confirmed by a joint motion filed for judicial approval.

The Federal Open Market Committee has kept the federal funds rate unchanged. The target range remains steady at 4.25%-4.50% as previously anticipated by market participants.

Japan’s economic outlook

With Japan’s leading economic index clocking in at 107.7 for March—just above the projected 107.5—we see a clear hint of momentum building within its domestic economy. This index, which compiles various economic indicators including employment and production, provides an overview of trends that often precede actual macro conditions. When we assess this positive deviation, even if slight, it implies forward motion in consumer activity and industrial expectations. Naturally, it nudges the yen into sharper focus for those participating in interest rate differentials and carry strategies. The performance also gives us a broader signal on how risk appetite may lean when Tokyo markets open, especially when paired with dovish tones from other central banks in the region.

EUR/USD’s upward drift toward 1.1250 during the European session—with little movement from Dollar demand—suggests that the market has priced in much of the shorter-term macro risk, at least for now. As US-China trade discussions loom in the background, market players have temporarily adjusted their positioning while waiting for clearer statements or policy shifts. Derivative exposure will naturally be impacted by implied volatility around these discussions, so options pricing near-term could lean either side depending on whether there’s any breakthrough or delay officially communicated. With the spread holding rather than reacting sharply, there’s a suggestion here that investors are opting to stay within ranges until new catalysts appear.

Over in the Sterling space, GBP/USD’s position below 1.3250 reflects restrained movement despite a slowing upward momentum in the US Dollar. The Bank of England’s current posture—with less urgency to cut—has not inspired much buying in the Pound. Bailey’s stance, particularly his tempered tone regarding the inflation outlook, holds sway over yields. As such, futures markets have already compressed expectations on where rates might go through the next quarter. This contributes to a confidence ceiling in the pound, which derivative traders will need to factor into risk premiums and longer-dated strategy placement. It becomes more about patience now—seeing whether the UK data catches up or diverges materially from the MPC’s stated views.

Gold’s continued upward push, albeit moderate, illustrates something fairly straightforward: geopolitical unease persistently drives safe-haven buying. Just as military-related concerns resurface in Eastern Europe and South Asia, investor focus shifts back into hard assets. The softening dollar adds another tailwind here, but the larger issue remains one of risk hedging. On our end, that translates to managing exposure on both commodity-linked options and ETFs with heavier metal weighting. Volatility surfaces in this context will adjust not only on demand but also on shifts in central bank purchases globally, especially from the PBoC and RBI, which have historically moved during times of military stand-offs or trade bottlenecks.

As for Ripple, its trading activity settling near $2.31 after circulating news of a possible $50 million settlement with US regulators has removed lingering uncertainty from its valuation. The joint legal motion strongly implies consensus on both sides, freeing up the market to refocus on fundamentals rather than litigation outcomes. The initial reaction priced in the regulatory overhang being reduced, which gives more clarity for volume assumptions going forward. Counterparty risk has decreased markedly in derivative positions linked to XRP, so spreads are likely to widen less. We’re monitoring closely to see if further positioning builds—or if this was a one-off clearance event before traders pivot to Ethereum or Solana for relative value setups.

The FOMC’s decision to hold the rate range steady at 4.25–4.50% hasn’t shocked portfolios. That said, implied yields along the curve remain sensitive to inflation-linked prints coming later in the month. With steady expectations baked into most futures positions pre-announcement, there’s limited need for rebalancing in current swaps unless data moves forcefully in one direction. Powell’s messaging lacked surprises, and for most of us that confirms the need to maintain straddles and neutral delta exposure in the shorter term. Risk appetite in equities may increase short-term, but positioning in rate derivatives will likely hinge on wage growth and shelter inflation late next week.

As we look ahead, keeping an eye on market-moving macro releases and any credible policy hints—especially from the Eurozone and China—will be central to how derivative pricing adjusts across asset classes. The theme remains conviction being challenged by uncertainty, so size accordingly.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Kato, Japan’s finance minister, stated that lowering the consumption tax is inappropriate at this time

Japan’s Finance Minister, Kato, stated on 6 February 2025 that lowering the consumption tax is not appropriate. This decision comes amid ongoing discussions about the nation’s economic policies.

Japan’s consumption tax, currently set at 10%, is a key revenue source for the government. Maintaining this tax level is seen as essential for funding social security programmes and addressing the country’s fiscal challenges.

Government’s Commitment to Economic Stability

Kato’s statement reflects the government’s commitment to maintaining economic stability. The consumption tax provides necessary funding, which supports Japan’s aging population and healthcare system.

Japan’s fiscal policies continue to face scrutiny due to the challenges of an aging demographic. Ensuring sustainable economic growth while managing public debt remains a central focus for Japan’s policymakers.

Kato’s remarks on 6 February make it clear that the Japanese government sees no room for adjustments in consumption tax policy, at least not downwards. Despite periodic public pressure, particularly during times of economic softness, a solid commitment to the 10% rate signals that fiscal conservatism is still driving budget decisions in Tokyo. The funds collected through this levy are not only filling the public purse — they’re underpinning a broad range of benefits, particularly health-related, that the country’s older citizens depend on.

We can read this as a declaration that fiscal tightening will not be walked back in the near term. Japan’s borrowing costs may be among the lowest globally, but even that luxury has its limits. The country’s debt-to-GDP ratio, already the highest in the developed world, means policymakers like Kato are left trying to avoid triggering concerns in bond markets or undermining trust in their long-term obligations. Standing by the current tax level reflects this balancing act — not just political messaging, but an effort to pre-empt unease among investors.

Monetary Tools as Levers of Choice

Nakamura at the Ministry has been steadily reinforcing this stance behind the scenes, occasionally through off-record briefings. These have hinted at reluctance to embrace short-term stimulus measures that carry long-term repayment concerns. Between rising care costs and a shrinking tax base, the margin for error is thin.

Markets have mostly accepted this posture, but what it tells us more broadly is that Japan’s leadership sees monetary tools and selective spending as the levers of choice, not cutting revenue sources. That context helps us understand where potential volatility might arise and where corrective action might be constrained.

In recent weeks, the yen has been under mild pressure, not solely due to external interest rate movements, but because Tokyo has few levers left on the fiscal side to stem fluctuations without undermining debt sustainability. That passivity, if it stretches into late February and early March, could cause forward curves in interest-rate swaps and JGB futures to twist in unhelpful directions, especially if external rate differentials widen.

There are clear signals buried in the broader message, and these don’t need decoding. When government officials sidestep popular tax relief measures during a time of rising living costs, they’re not playing games — they’re prioritising confidence in Japan’s long-term financial credibility. It’s this focus that can influence the yield curve as well, especially in the belly, where maturities are most reactive to fiscal firmness arguments.

We should also be aware that this has implications for implied volatility. If relief expectations are being quashed methodically, it reduces the probability of left-tail fiscal surprises — and by extension, narrows short-dated options pricing. Carry strategies that thrive on mean-reverting ranges could become incrementally more appealing. Though liquidity remains solid, divergences between flow-driven moves and macro triggers are likely to become more apparent as policy choices like this narrow the range of plausible scenarios.

Fukuda’s consistent commentary from the Bank has already helped calibrate expectations. The sense that policy won’t ride to the rescue creates a steadier base for how curves behave in quiet sessions. But it also means any external shock — whether from commodity prices or US rate moves — risks being amplified. In this climate, convexity pricing on the long end could start reacting more to non-Japan data, simply because local anchors have been pinned so deliberately, and the local variables constrained.

We, reading this carefully, can start to realign near-term bias and strikes accordingly. Positioning too defensively could result in missed theta, while excessive optimism about front-end curve steepening might underplay how anchored Tokyo wishes to remain. Traders will need to reassess which catalysts are really live under such a defined fiscal perimeter.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

In the United Arab Emirates, gold prices experienced an increase, based on recent data analysis

Gold prices in the United Arab Emirates increased on Friday. The price for Gold per gram rose from 390.34 AED to 391.84 AED, while the price per tola climbed to 4,570.33 AED from 4,552.89 AED.

Geopolitical developments impact commodity markets, with Gold often seen as a safe haven during such times. A trade deal was announced between the US and the UK, but US tariffs remain at 10%. The US is considering reducing tariffs on China, which could influence the XAU/USD pair.

Federal Reserve Impact

The Federal Reserve announced it is unlikely to cut interest rates soon. This news led to a rise in the US Dollar, affecting Gold prices. However, geopolitical tensions involving Russia, Ukraine, and other regions continue to support Gold’s safe-haven appeal.

Central banks are major Gold holders, diversifying their reserves to bolster economic stability. In 2022, they added 1,136 tonnes of Gold, marking a record-high year for purchases. Gold prices are inversely related to the US Dollar and stock markets, often rising with lower interest rates.

Last week closed with a measured pickup in gold prices across the United Arab Emirates. Per gram, rates ticked up modestly—settling around 391.84 AED. Tola values moved in tandem, reaching just over 4,570 AED by end of day Friday. It wasn’t a sweeping move, but it suggests that some underlying factors are pressing into the market with enough weight to lift spot prices.

Gold’s Response to Global Politics

We’ve observed that commodity pricing, particularly that of gold, often responds to shifts in global politics faster than broader financial instruments. A recently formalised trade agreement between Washington and London might come across as supportive to broader trade sentiment, but with tariffs still sitting unchanged at 10%, its impact remains somewhat contained. On the other hand, there’s potential movement from Washington toward easing tariffs on Beijing—a development worth tracking, as any such change could send quick ripples through the gold-dollar equation.

The Federal Reserve, meanwhile, stuck firmly to its stance on rates. No cuts appear to be on the horizon in the near term. That message underpinned the strength of the dollar last week, applying downward pressure on precious metals. Nevertheless, the wider geopolitical atmosphere offers a different push. Events between Moscow and Kyiv, and unrest in select other zones, continue to foster caution, and it’s caution that often triggers flows into gold. It acts as insurance. We see this pattern consistently repeated.

One cannot ignore the position central banks have taken over the last couple of years. In 2022, they added more than 1,100 tonnes to their gold holdings—a record by volume. Movements like these go beyond routine adjustments. They’re defensive, strategic steps to fortify financial buffers. It’s not about price speculation, it’s a stronger message of preference for hard assets when the broader monetary system appears under pressure.

Gold’s inverse link with both the USD and equity indices remains intact. When yields turn unattractive or stock performance wavers, demand in gold tends to climb. But for now, rates haven’t dropped, and markets—especially in equities—still show resilience. That tension puts us in a window where gold may consolidate before the next defined move.

Through the next few weeks, vigilance remains key. Price action in metals might not be erratic, but the signals are layered—monetary policy, geopolitical flashpoints, reserve allocations. Traders tuned in to those levers, rather than just reacting to headlines, stand better positioned to extract returns. Regular calibration against these underlying factors will be required.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Westpac anticipates the RBNZ will reduce rates by 25bp in both May and July, NZD/USD stable

Westpac predicts that the Reserve Bank of New Zealand will reduce interest rates. The expected cuts are 25 basis points in both May and July.

After the forecast was announced, the NZD/USD exchange rate remained relatively stable. It was trading at approximately 0.5902.

Interest Rate Reductions Expected

What we’re seeing here is a forecast by Westpac calling for two interest rate reductions from the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, each amounting to 25 basis points—first in May, then another in July. A basis point is just a hundredth of a percent, so we’re talking about a combined half-percentage-point reduction over a few months. Effectively, Westpac anticipates that monetary policy in New Zealand is heading towards easing. This generally suggests concerns about economic slowdowns, lower inflation, or both.

Following the release of this forecast, the NZD/USD pair held steady, hardly moving from its level around 0.5902. That lack of volatility is noteworthy. One might’ve expected a softening of the New Zealand dollar on rate-cut expectations. But the currency market appeared to have either anticipated some of this ahead of time, or is taking a wait-and-see approach. There’s also the chance that other macro or global currency dynamics are offsetting the downward pressure such forecasts usually exert on a currency.

Now, what matters most for us over the coming weeks is how near-term interest rate expectations adjust in response to additional data. Inflation prints and employment figures coming out of New Zealand will shape the credibility of the bank’s dovish timing. If inflation decelerates quicker than models suggest, or if previous hikes are seen biting more deeply into consumer activity, then downward pressure on front-end yields may accelerate. Swap rates in that environment might begin to tilt more gently, but still firmly, towards the lower side.

Orr has not signalled any sharp pivots in tone, yet reactions like Westpac’s suggest that private sector models are more pessimistic than central bank projections. We must be attentive to these discrepancies, especially between market-implied expectations and official forward guidance. Watching the divergence helps gauge whether announced cuts will actually materialise, or if sentiment is running ahead of itself.

Impacts on Yield Curves and Currency

From our position in the curve, it becomes more important to observe whether flattening pressures begin extending past the belly. If short-end yields react more sharply to incoming CPI or GDP surprises, that may warrant closer attention to carry dynamics. Especially for those of us holding leveraged positions, slight moves could trigger rapid repricing. A 5–10 basis point swing over the week could imply larger margin effects than initially expected.

As for the currency, the muted response needs to be taken into account. Currency pairs like NZD/USD that show resilience in the face of dovish adjustment forecasts may have underlying support elsewhere—possibly in commodity performance or relative rate differentials. If that’s sustained, hedging exposure through options might lose its appeal in favour of directional views tied to rate momentum.

Robertson’s fiscal commentary, while outside the orbit of monetary policy directly, may indirectly reinforce these trends. Should there be any unanticipated fiscal support, it could counteract expected easing, at least temporarily, and dampen bond buying enthusiasm that would otherwise benefit from a dovish tilt. We need to assess how fiscal policy intersects with market reaction timing, particularly when evaluating forward swap curves and implied volatility signals.

So, it’s not just about watching August pricing. Focus more on how the curve shapes itself between the May and July meeting windows. Current expectations, if reinforced through additional macro softening, could provide short-term yield compression trades underpinned by defensive positioning. Premiums may be low, but so are patience levels among market participants waiting for confirmed direction.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

In March, manufacturing output in the Netherlands declined by 0.6%, following a rise of 1.2%

In March, the manufacturing output in the Netherlands decreased by 0.6%, contrasting with a previous rise of 1.2%. This change in output reflects fluctuations in the country’s industrial production.

The EUR/USD pair traded higher near 1.1250 due to a temporary halt in US Dollar purchases. Additionally, GBP/USD remained under 1.3250 as attention shifted to upcoming US-China trade discussions.

Gold prices fell to below $3,300 amid a stronger US Dollar bolstered by a US-UK trade deal. However, a daily close below the 21-day SMA at $3,307 would be necessary to alter the short-term bullish trend for gold.

Ripple Price Breakout Potential

Ripple’s price hovered around $2.31, with potential for a $3 breakout post a $50M settlement with the SEC. The decision is pending judicial approval but signals a crucial progression for Ripple.

The Federal Open Market Committee maintained the federal funds rate target range at 4.25%-4.50%. This consistency aligns with market expectations and indicates a neutral stance in monetary policy changes.

The recent dip in Dutch manufacturing output by 0.6% reverses the previous month’s growth and suggests a lack of sustained industrial demand. While a single month of contraction isn’t necessarily alarming in isolation, the shift does feed into broader uncertainty within the Eurozone’s production base. We should interpret this weakening backdrop as another small data point pointing toward uneven underlying growth. From an options pricing perspective, it becomes increasingly likely that implied volatility for European assets may compress unless further downside in output materialises.

Looking over to currency movements, the rise of the EUR/USD near 1.1250 can be attributed to US dollar softness rather than euro strength. A temporary pause in greenback demand can often be tied to shifting near-term rate expectations or month-end flows, neither of which tend to be durable catalysts. In this instance, the move invites caution before chasing euro upside. We remain watchful for positioning squeezes near this level but see little merit in increasing delta-exposure unless a breakout is accompanied by a reset in US Treasury yields.

Geopolitical Impacts on GBP and Gold

As for GBP/USD hovering under 1.3250, the lack of immediate upside follows speculation surrounding forthcoming US-China talks. The political weight behind these talks places added relevance on cross-border sentiment rather than domestic UK macro inputs. With the cable pair responding more to external risks than to Bank of England rate trajectory, option skew on both sides of 1.32 warrants close reading. Engaging in directional plays ahead of such geopolitical events increases risk-to-reward asymmetry in short-term derivatives.

Gold’s slide under $3,300 comes on the back of a US-UK trade deal enhancing dollar appeal. Stronger greenback days have never been gold-friendly. Even so, barring a clear break below the 21-day SMA at $3,307, the metal’s bullish structure remains unbroken, albeit pressured. We are keeping an eye on intraday closes rather than just session lows to assess technical deterioration. Variable moves like these reinforce why static stop placements are rarely fit for commodities with this much speculative flow involved.

Ripple, consolidating around $2.31 after the $50 million settlement with the SEC, awaits final judicial approval. While that approval is procedural, it clears legal noise and enables reflation of speculative interest. The possible push past $3 depends less on the legal reprieve and more on how much capital rotates back into altcoins post-resolution. At these levels, the call-buying already reflects a market that’s pricing in more than just clarity — it sees momentum resuming. Directional gamma exposure starts becoming crowded on the upside here, so trimming into moves might be preferable.

Meanwhile, the FOMC’s decision to hold the policy rate at 4.25%–4.50% was widely anticipated and doesn’t require immediate portfolio reshuffling. The reaffirmed neutral posture, in practical terms, keeps front-end yield expectations steady. As such, Fed funds futures remain an accurate tool for aligning short-dated trade timing with macro recalibration intervals. We find it’s best not to extrapolate too liberally from the hold — especially with inflation prints due in the coming fortnight, which could alter at-the-money implieds across bond rate interventions and their spillover to equity vol.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Japan’s household spending rose 2.1% annually, surprising expectations, while wage growth was weaker than forecast

In March 2025, Japan experienced a year-on-year increase in household spending of 2.1%, surpassing the expected growth of 0.2%. The month-on-month rise was 0.4%, as opposed to the anticipated decline of 0.5%.

The data suggests an improvement in domestic consumption patterns. However, consumers are maintaining frugal habits, especially regarding food expenditure.

Japan Wage Growth

Japan’s wages data for March showed a 2.1% year-on-year increase in Labour Cash Earnings. This figure fell short of the expected 2.3% rise and was lower than the previous month’s 3.1% growth.

Although consumer spending in March ticked above expectations, indicating a step forward for consumption, the muted wage growth points to underlying strain. Households may be adjusting their activity not in anticipation of rising incomes, but rather by cautiously broadening non-essential expenditure. When earnings fail to outpace inflation by a firm margin, as we’ve seen here, spending changes tend to come with hesitation. Put simply, while the Japanese consumer has shown modest resilience, it’s hardly carefree.

The reduction in real wage growth momentum from February to March—falling a full percentage point—is harder to ignore. It narrows the room for optimism. Disposable income isn’t expanding at a clip that would allow for sustained loosening of the purse strings. When food spending remains suppressed, despite improved headline figures on overall expenditure, we can’t help but see that inflation has likely shifted habits more persistently.

We shouldn’t see this as merely a misfire in predictions. Rather, it’s a set of signals that force us to pick apart market sentiment from its structure. Consumption data and labour earnings are diverging—not violently, but enough to dent the conclusion that forward momentum in the economy is assured.

Implications For Japan’s Economy

From a positioning standpoint, this is where we adjust our lens. Wage trends deserve closer consideration than they often receive, especially when aligning interest rate expectations with domestic activity. The Bank of Japan might find itself cornered by these mixed indicators: inflation pressures on one side, but a consumer who’s not stretching as far as headline numbers suggest on the other.

That hesitation in earnings growth weakens the case for aggressive tightening, and that matters for volatility watchers. If policy remains broadly supportive, yet inflation remains sticky, we’re likely to see rates implied by instruments drifting rather than leaping. The possibilities for sharp dislocations become more remote—but they don’t vanish.

It’s tempting to be swept up in the beat on household spending. But when the finer components tell us that food purchases are flat or falling, allocation decisions should lean more on balance sheet caution than momentum reasoning. We’ve seen it before: headlines move early pricing, but core patterns wind up dictating outcomes.

Analysts who forecasted a slimmer 0.2% growth in spending may have looked too narrowly at income trends, and that’s understandable. But the edge in expectations, followed by sour wage numbers, strengthens the call for selective delta exposure rather than broad directional leaning.

Markets don’t operate by pure arithmetic, yet this dataset delivers a clean message to those of us reading between the lines: hold to shorter tenors where pricing has run ahead of fundamentals. There’s appetite returning in the demand cycle, yet the earnings to support it are slower to rebuild, and that lag makes this window one not to chase aggressively.

Let us be clear—any short-lived reaction to the consumption beat has to be weighed against the softening in income growth. When real wages underperform forecasts after previously strong readings, the risk is that consumption will follow suit in coming months. Spreads that had narrowed may have limited room left unless external demand surprises on the upside. Tightening positioning around volatility plays makes sense, while leaving flexibility for recalibration if earnings data stabilises.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Trading around 0.6400, the AUD/USD pair rebounds after Chinese trade balance data influences market sentiment

AUD/USD hovers near 0.6400 after recent Chinese trade data. The pair had previously faced downward pressure due to stalled US-China trade negotiations.

China’s trade balance for April stood at $96.18 billion, exceeding expected figures yet slightly below the previous $102.63 billion. The Australian Dollar remains sensitive to Chinese economic performance due to their strong trading relationship.

Chinese Trade Figures

In April, Chinese exports grew by 8.1% year-on-year, surpassing expectations but down from 12.4% previously. Imports contracted slightly by 0.2%, showing improvement over both anticipated and prior figures.

China’s trade surplus with the US decreased in April to $20.46 billion from March’s $27.6 billion. Discussions persist on US-China tariffs, contributing to market uncertainty.

Regarding the Australian Dollar, key factors include the Reserve Bank of Australia’s interest rates and Australia’s export prices for goods like Iron Ore. As China’s largest trading partner, Australia’s currency is influenced by the Chinese economy’s health.

Iron Ore’s price changes also impact the Australian Dollar, given the significance of this commodity in Australian exports. A strong Trade Balance supports the Australian Dollar, while a weaker one can cause depreciation.

Market Positioning and Volatility

With AUD/USD holding steady around the 0.6400 level, following the latest figures out of China, a few things have come into focus. The data, while not far off expectations, still delivered a slight miss when compared to last month’s totals. There’s a moderate pullback in Chinese exports and a smaller shortfall in imports – both of which suggest a shift in foreign demand patterns and perhaps an easing of global inventory builds.

Looking at the surplus figure—China booked $96.18 billion for April—it remains robust, though shy of March’s $102.63 billion. Taken together with a narrowing surplus with the US, from $27.6 billion to $20.46 billion, this suggests there’s some softening in key trade routes, or at least a recalibration of shipping volumes.

Now, why this matters for market positioning is relatively straightforward. Australia’s economic health is closely linked to how China spends, particularly on input-heavy manufacturing. Iron Ore exports are often treated as a bellwether, and any moderation in China’s construction or steel output can feed into the Australian Dollar swiftly.

On the trade side, the 8.1% year-on-year export growth out of China looks optimistic, though it’s cooling from the prior 12.4%. That’s a deceleration worth tracking, especially since the domestic rebound story in China has remained uneven. At the same time, imports only edged down by 0.2% instead of a sharper drop-off, which points to tentative signs of stabilisation in Chinese consumer or industrial buying. It may not spell a broad pickup, but it’s less of a drag than anticipated.

This kind of environment tends to create choppier sessions. With the AUD often treated as a proxy for Chinese activity, any forward-looking weakness or resilience in Chinese data will almost never stay local. There are also adjustments happening behind the scenes as traders weigh the Reserve Bank’s next steps on rate policy, which goes hand-in-hand with how inflation trends unfold domestically. There’s little room for policy surprises unless macro conditions shift dramatically.

Looking ahead, we might want to watch the Iron Ore flow and pricing closely, not only for their headline impact but also in terms of their knock-on effects on Australia’s terms of trade. Given AUD’s historical tendency to react sharply to commodity-linked variations, even minor interruptions in seaborne shipments or demand forecasts out of China can provoke noticeable volatility in the pair.

With talk around US-China tariff frameworks still unresolved, skepticism continues to shape sentiment. Elevated uncertainty won’t vanish without clarity, and that bleeds into correlated assets. As such, it would make sense to assess positioning through the lens of near-term volatility bands and remain aware of offshore developments on both sides of the Pacific.

In short, the current stretch near the 0.6400 handle may not hold, given the underlying cadence of macro numbers and external influence. It’s not simply a question of risk-on or risk-off anymore—it’s about the directions in which trade flows evolve, and how well they synchronise with expectations vs. previous momentum.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Back To Top
Chatbots