The focus is on the EURUSD, USDJPY, and GBPUSD as traders begin the US forex trading day. Fed officials are now commenting post-decision, with Adriana Kugler noting first-quarter growth data suggests activity anticipation due to tariffs. She mentions potential inflation risks from tariffs but stresses the economy’s resilience supports the Fed’s gradual approach to inflation reduction.

Michael Barr warns that Trump’s new tariffs could increase inflation, slow growth, and boost unemployment, complicating the Fed’s position should both inflation and joblessness rise. He points to uncertain tariff impacts, possible supply chain disruptions, and strain on small businesses, maintaining the Fed’s adjustable stance.

Us China Trade Relations

Trump, post-UK trade deal, suggests an 80% tariff on China “seems right”, leaving the decision to Treasury Secretary Bessent. A US-China meeting is planned in Switzerland. Senior Trade Advisor Navarro predicts active weekend trade deals, citing the UK deal as a model for agriculture agreements and criticising EU rhetoric as unproductive for ongoing talks.

Canada’s employment report is due, with an expected employment change of 2.5K and an unemployment rate of 6.8%. US pre-market stocks show gains with the Dow, S&P, and Nasdaq up. In US bonds, short-term yields fall while long-term yields rise, with mixed results from recent auctions.

That earlier section draws attention to pivotal exchange rates moving into the US trading session—EURUSD, USDJPY, and GBPUSD specifically. Policy signals are also becoming clearer now that Federal Reserve officials have begun to unpack recent decisions. Kugler’s comments lean on the idea that earlier strength in growth was perhaps front-loaded, a kind of pre-reaction to forthcoming tariffs. She does acknowledge the inflationary risks tied to these tariffs, but believes the Fed is still within its path to taper inflation without an economic jolt.

On the other hand, Barr expresses a sharper concern. He underlines the potential for tariffs to fan the wrong kind of inflation—price rises that come without healthy growth to match. There’s also the added headache of how such policies would ripple through employment figures and the health of smaller firms. His language suggests the Fed is biding its time quietly, knowing it may need to pivot with little warning if external pressures mount suddenly or are mishandled at higher political levels.

Then there’s the trade front, where recent developments are rapidly hardening into positions. Trump floats a tariff rate that would practically isolate Chinese imports, while giving the Treasury Secretary final say. This can’t be read in isolation; the upcoming meeting in Switzerland signals there’s still a channel for direct talk, though perhaps more symbolic than productive at this point.

Canadian Labor Market

Navarro puts his emphasis on weekend progress, possibly overestimating what can be duplicated from the UK agreement, especially in agricultural talks. His swipe at the EU is not just posturing—it might also angle at a rerouting of efforts away from Brussels and towards more pliable partners. If that reading is correct, we should ready for heavier volatility around public comments, particularly if made without coordination.

Elsewhere, Canada’s jobs data has been priced with soft hands—2.5K expected in total net employment isn’t inspiring, and unemployment nudging just shy of 7% underscores a slowly cooling labour market. That could restrain CAD enthusiasm unless wages show unexpected strength.

Markets are leaning slightly risk-on with US equities ticking higher across all major indices. But watch the bond market: it’s telegraphing a growing imbalance. Short-term yields moving lower might reflect rate expectations beyond the summer, while long-end yields rising suggests that inflation and debt supply are quietly becoming problems traders can’t ignore much longer.

We should, in the next few sessions, be cautious extending positions too far in either direction. Rates traders might find some asymmetry in options at the longer-end, especially if supply metrics and auctions remain mixed. The dollar’s recent softness could reverse sharply if China talks stall or if Friday’s Michigan data surprises. But for now, flows appear thin and reactive, not strategic.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Federal Reserve Governor Adriana Kugler has stated that the policy rate is currently moderately restrictive. She highlighted the importance of keeping long-term inflation expectations stable and noted some upside risk to inflation due to tariffs.

The economy has shown resilience, providing the Federal Reserve time to address inflation challenges. Growth data from the first quarter indicated a potential slowdown ahead, possibly influenced by tariff-related uncertainties.

Us Dollar Index Changes

The US Dollar Index fell by 0.25%, standing at 100.39, following these statements. The Federal Reserve plays a role in shaping US monetary policy by adjusting interest rates to manage inflation and employment levels.

The Fed conducts eight monetary policy meetings annually. These meetings allow an assessment of economic conditions and decisions on monetary policy.

Quantitative Easing (QE) involves increasing credit flow in challenging financial times and can weaken the US Dollar. Conversely, Quantitative Tightening (QT) reduces such interventions, potentially strengthening the dollar.

Monetary Policy Observations

Kugler’s remarks suggest that policy remains reasonably firm, but not overly so, leaving room for flexibility should inflation stray from current expectations. When she speaks of “moderate restriction,” she refers to an interest rate environment that leans towards controlling price pressures without fully squeezing economic momentum. Her emphasis on stable long-term inflation expectations implies that the Federal Reserve is more inclined to avoid abrupt shifts, instead keeping financial conditions relatively tight to ensure inflation stays on track.

The mention of tariffs introduces a variable that may push prices higher, particularly in sectors sensitive to trade costs—something that could influence the rate path. Here, it’s clear that external policy factors—especially trade measures—are being taken seriously as risks to the inflation outlook. Traders watching rate futures or positioning around Fed announcements will want to keep these pressures in focus as price volatility could follow if headline inflation increases faster than anticipated.

While the economy continues to exhibit stable footing, the first-quarter growth dip shines a light on what could be early caution signs. Whether this reflects a lasting deceleration or a temporary drag remains to be seen, but it’s enough reason for policymakers to tread carefully. For those of us involved in derivative markets, this invites closer monitoring of interest rate-sensitive products—particularly those tied to short-term yield curves, which often adjust quickly on fresh economic data.

The slide in the US Dollar Index after Kugler’s address reflects some recalibration, possibly due to perceptions that tightening may pause sooner than previously thought. A weaker dollar, driven by this interpretation, can alter expectations in currency options and FX forwards, specifically in dollar pairs. This shifts the attention to relative rate expectations across other central banks.

The Fed’s eight scheduled gatherings per year now carry more directional weight. Each meeting becomes an opportunity for repositioning, requiring attention to both macro indicators and language shifts in official communications. Anyone trading futures or options on rates will find it helpful to factor in these dates in risk models—with implied volatility likely to increase around them.

QE and QT remain reference points for assessing how the Fed uses its balance sheet to impact liquidity. While QE often decreases the dollar’s strength due to increased liquidity, QT’s draining effect tends to have the opposite outcome. Since we are well into tightening territory, likely manifesting through both rate levels and lower balance sheet holdings, that adds pressure to duration-linked trades and instruments tracking real yields. For now, with balance sheet reduction ongoing, this change in liquidity conditions must be factored into pricing longer-dated options and swaps.

In the next few weeks, economic indicators such as CPI releases, employment numbers, and any federal statements will shape rate expectations. It’s essential to anchor short volatility around those windows, especially in products where convexity can spike unexpectedly.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The session’s main topic was Trump’s suggestion of 80% tariffs on China, sparking market uncertainty. This figure is higher than prior discussions of 50%, but markets are unsure of its effectiveness in negotiations with China. US futures fluctuated but eventually rose modestly, with S&P 500 futures up by 0.3%. The dollar depreciated, with USD/JPY down 0.5% to 145.15 and EUR/USD up 0.2% to 1.1250.

Market Reactions

In bond markets, US 10-year yields rose to 4.39%, and 30-year yields reached 4.87%. Gold saw a 0.9% increase to $3,334.02. The yen led in currency performance, while the New Zealand dollar lagged. European equities experienced gains, alongside S&P 500 futures. WTI crude oil went up 2.2% to $61.25, and Bitcoin increased slightly by 0.3% to $102,988.

Fed officials discussed monetary policy’s current position and future adjustments, while ECB and BoE representatives shared insights on inflation and economic outlooks. European markets remained cautious, anticipating further trade developments and their impact ahead of US-China talks. With the week’s end approaching, market participants are watching for shifts in positioning before discussions, which could cause market gaps at the start of the next week.

At its heart, the message being telegraphed is one of uncertainty—but uncertainty with measurable signals. Trump’s proposed tariff hike, lifting the figure from the prior 50% to 80%, triggered a flurry across asset classes, pushing traders into more defensive rearrangements despite the lack of detail on implementation. Markets digested this with hesitation, though ultimately US futures eked out modest gains. That bounce, though small, reflects a sentiment recovery from initial shock rather than underlying confidence.

Yields climbing on the 10-year and 30-year Treasuries tells us bond markets are adjusting their expectations for policy, growth, and inflation—all of which may be more sensitive to potential global strain than initial equity reactions suggest. Moreover, the rally in gold—up nearly 1%—reinforces that plenty hedged themselves into safe-haven territory, not ready to take on broader directional risk just yet. Our read is that momentum in bond pricing and precious metals should not be written off as transitory, but considered part of a broader repositioning in anticipation of disruptions.

Currency Movements

Currency movements were equally telling. The dollar’s slip, particularly against the yen and euro, underscores how quickly risk aversion can tilt flows into havens and developed-market peers. The yen itself led gains, with traders likely viewing it as buffered from trade crossfire. Meanwhile, the New Zealand dollar underperformed, possibly on the back of its economic linkages and more limited room for policy offset.

We note that oil’s revaluation, up more than 2%, might be lending weight to two ideas: one being that supply risks are re-entering traders’ minds; the other, that anything which could dent China’s import demand is being weighed against more volatile trade tightening globally. Bitcoin’s move, small though it was, continues to indicate a preference for liquidity over new directional conviction in the short term.

Comments from central bank officials added needed precision. While the Federal Reserve’s path remains shaped by inflation data and employment strength, we’re seeing greater openness to tweaks at the margin should global demand falter. The ECB and BoE mirrored this tone, less aggressive on future hikes and more aware of the external drag upcoming tensions might produce. These aren’t full reversals, but concessions to current pressures that suggest a more balanced stance ahead.

European equities advanced, but modestly and with caution—a clear recognition that any clarity from trade discussions is days away. Traders there seem to be building in room for adjustment, rather than pressing directional bets before confirmation. Increased sensitivity to weekend risks—particularly gaps—is emerging, and we believe posturing is likely to widen for both downside hedges and tactical upside, especially in sectors and products exposed to the Asia-Pacific region.

From our perspective, participants in rate products and volatility pricing should remain sharply focused on the potential dislocations from policy comments and immediate trade headlines. Related derivatives, particularly those linked to exports, inflation, and sovereign debt, are aligned for quick repricing. Pattern recognition from prior trade stand-offs shows that the first active trading hours following fresh geopolitical headlines often create price vacuums, rapidly filled by those quickest to adjust exposure or close out temporarily misaligned positions.

Pricing activity through the remainder of the week will likely reflect this—a deliberate effort to stay nimble, keep size limited, and face the possibility of forced unwinds come Monday’s open.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Chinese refineries continued their high levels of crude oil imports in April, totaling 11.7 million barrels per day. This figure represented a 7.5% increase compared to the previous year, although slightly lower than the preceding month.

The fall in oil prices during April facilitated stock-building by refineries, with Vortexa estimating a stock build-up exceeding 1 million barrels per day. However, sustaining these import levels may become challenging in the forthcoming months.

Current Import Levels

Oil imports from Iran have remained at high levels, reportedly at 1.5 million barrels per day. Yet, inclusion on the US sanctions list of certain Chinese refineries due to Iranian oil purchases suggests potential future declines in import volumes.

Recent US sanctions resulted in another Chinese refinery being added to the list, affecting import patterns. Forward-looking statements suggest potential market risks and the necessity for thorough research before making trading decisions.

Much of the narrative around April’s oil imports into China hinges on both strategic timing and price sensitivity. When we consider that China’s refineries ramped up crude oil imports to 11.7 million barrels per day—a 7.5% increase compared to the same period last year—it’s clear that lower oil prices during that month played straight into their hands. These refiners had an opportunity to stack their inventories cheaply, and they seized it. However, it’s worth noting these imports did dip slightly against the March figures, pointing to possible signs of a cooling pace.

Vortexa’s data backing a stock build of over 1 million barrels per day reinforces this interpretation. It’s a substantial accumulation by any measure and reflects a deliberate strategy underpinned by short-term pricing. Still, while building inventories during price dips is a sound approach, maintaining this level of inflow over the coming months could become considerably more difficult—not least because of mounting external pressures.

Future Market Considerations

Specifically, ongoing imports from Iran have held firm at roughly 1.5 million barrels per day. This continued strong flow seems to be a linchpin of current strategy. Yet, that line is looking increasingly strained. The inclusion of certain domestic refineries on the US sanctions list—purely as a repercussion for engaging with Iranian crude—signals what may lie ahead. Indeed, with an additional facility recently blacklisted, it’s fair to say the pressure is not letting up. Wider trade channels may start to feel knock-on effects if compliance risk grows or if insurance and shipping constraints become more binding.

From the market perspective we’re reading, what stands out is a rising tension between attractive short-term economics and longer-term regulatory exposure. With tighter scrutiny from Washington, prospects for continued free-flowing Iranian barrels into Chinese ports may dim. Thus, while April may have presented a near-perfect scenario for higher imports, the same cannot be assumed for the next quarter.

For derivative traders, this puts a fresh lens on risk calibration. The optimistic sentiment implied by broader import figures should be weighed against a backdrop of increasing enforcement actions and the implicit signals that come with expanded sanctions. We’d suggest paying close attention to marine traffic data that might reveal early rerouting trends, as well as shifts in forward curves that hint at changes in physical balance.

We’ve seen before that disruptions linked to geopolitics tend to first show up in time spreads and options volatility. The sharper among us will be looking to exploit these early, before the broader market adjusts. As such, careful monitoring of refinery runs, on-hand inventory estimates, and shifts in spot differentials could offer an edge in the weeks ahead.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US Trade Adviser Peter Navarro indicated that the upcoming weekend would be noteworthy for the markets. Japan is adept at safeguarding its markets, while several countries are eager to engage in trade discussions with the US, with the EU being a priority.

The Value Added Tax in Europe poses challenges for the US in these trade conversations. For indices traders, the weekend carries a high level of risk. Those without favourable positions might consider closing them before reassessing market conditions in the following week.

Policy Developments and Market Signals

What the article outlines is a set of signals that, though dressed diplomatically, carry practical implications for those monitoring futures and related instruments. Navarro’s remarks, while couched in general terms, hint at the possibility of policy developments or preliminary agreements being announced over the weekend—ones that have not yet been absorbed into pricing. It’s not the announcement itself that matters so much as the potential for miscalculation leading to volatility when trading resumes.

Japan’s consistency in navigating financial uncertainty points to relatively insulated exposure in the short term. That steadiness implies we may not see abrupt changes in Japanese-linked assets. Traders should take this as a prompt to weight Asian entries with less urgency unless new data contradicts current assumptions. In contrast, with the EU being drawn into fresh trade interest and taxation policies at the core of sticking points, equities indexed to European firms with strong ties to American demand may react disproportionately to signals around tariffs or compliance costs.

The Value Added Tax discussion represents more than a technicality here. It functions as both a friction point in negotiations and a pricing mechanism that distorts parity with US competitors. This misalignment may not be corrected overnight, but it is likely to attract questions from those who move macro exposure across regions. When inconsistencies between policy and price clarity occur, short-term shocks become more probable, particularly for leveraged products.

Weekend Exposure and Risk Management

We expect that many will weigh their weekend exposure carefully. Given that political signals are undated but specific in tone, it doesn’t take much for speculative positioning to build in the wrong direction. The recommendation to lighten positions, particularly into a weekend, reads as a precaution against gaps—price moves that occur between Friday close and Monday open—that could trigger stops at less-than-favourable levels.

In these windows, being flat can often outperform being early. Risk is front-loaded when news is likely but context is missing. Rather than chase certainty, it’s better to enter next week with cash to deploy and a strategy aligned with whichever direction talks—or the market—break. Until there is clarity on what, if anything, is announced, remaining selective about what is held and how long it’s held is not only sensible, it’s actionable.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Pound Sterling saw gains on the news of a trade deal between the US and the UK and the Bank of England’s (BoE) policy decision. The BoE reduced interest rates by 25 basis points to 4.25%, marking the fourth adjustment in the current cycle.

In a 7-2 split, two members of the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) wanted no change, while two others sought a larger cut of 50 bps. Despite the expectations of a rate reduction by all members, this divergence reflects differing views on the economy’s needs.

Gbp/USD Performance

The GBP/USD fell to a multi-week low early on Friday before recovering above 1.3250. Despite the recovery, it faces challenges in surpassing key technical resistance levels during the European session.

The Bank of England stated that a gradual approach to unwinding monetary restrictions remains appropriate. This cautious stance comes as markets and exchange rates continue to respond to the latest economic developments.

We’ve observed in recent days that the Pound experienced a wave of strength following two key developments—first, the announcement of a trade agreement between the US and the UK, and second, the Bank of England’s decision to reduce interest rates by a quarter percentage point. This now places the base rate at 4.25%, marking the fourth adjustment since this cycle began. The rate cut was not entirely uniform in support, however: while the majority leaned toward this move, a split within the committee revealed some deeper questions around inflation control and economic momentum.

Seven out of nine policymakers agreed to the cut, but two members pushed for a sharper response—a 50 basis point reduction. Meanwhile, another pair resisted easing altogether. That sort of divergence often points us to underlying uncertainty about forward growth estimates, inflation expectations, or both. Such a divide doesn’t usually happen unless some members see secondary risks—perhaps in sectors of the economy showing more persistent inflation or, conversely, signs of weakening demand that favour stronger easing.

Sterling And Market Reactions

Sterling, for its part, initially slumped to a short-term low against the US dollar, likely in response to signs the BoE is preparing to stay cautious for longer. Still, we saw a quick bounce, taking the pair above 1.3250, although it has struggled to breach the more entrenched resistance levels since. That hesitation around key technical markers suggests market participants are still weighing the long-term implications of the central bank’s tone.

The bank has emphasised that removing policy restrictions will be done slowly. Market conditions remain sensitive to such signals, especially when aligned with macro data that may not yet confirm whether inflation is fully cooling in line with forecasts. This stance, by extension, tells us a few things—not least that we shouldn’t expect rapid shifts in monetary policy, even if future data show uneven growth across sectors or months.

As we interpret the moves from Threadneedle Street, what becomes clearer is the weight being given to downside risks. That includes weaker business investment and household spending, which some on the committee likely viewed as needing more policy support. At the same time, acknowledging that the bank didn’t go with a more aggressive cut shows some lingering concern about inflation remaining sticky.

The trade agreement has also acted as a tailwind for Sterling. These events often drive short-term optimism, particularly when they involve increased access to markets or tariffs being reduced. Yet currency traders tend to shift focus quickly toward monetary expectations and core economic numbers, as that’s where pricing over the medium term is often derived.

With those dynamics in play, we’re now watching how implied volatility prices react to upcoming inflation readings and BoE commentary. Swaps have started to reflect cautious pricing for the next three to six months—we believe that tells us to be selective with directional bias. If more aggressive pricing for rate cuts is unwound, spot levels may adjust quickly.

We should also consider that ranges may stay narrower in the coming sessions unless we see either strong surprises in economic data or more explicit forward guidance from the central bank. As derivative traders, we now find ourselves in a cycle where incremental changes in sentiment will likely drive short bursts of activity, rather than extended trends.

Regarding volume and liquidity, attention could pivot toward weekly volatility scores. Those metrics help determine whether we are stretching toward breakout territory or merely consolidating within recent bands. Bonds have largely traded with low dispersion in recent sessions, which often precedes a re-pricing at the front end of the curve—not necessarily in spot, but in three- and six-month horizons.

We’ve updated our options strategies, placing more emphasis on carry and less on chasing momentum. The latest divergence on the MPC supports this approach, as it hints at a wider spread of market expectations and, potentially, higher realised volatility if consensus proves fleeting. Whether or not others adopt similar positions, we’ve found it prudent to hedge against medium-term resets in rate projections.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Fed’s Kugler alerts to potential inflation from tariffs, while weak demand could stymie growth. Markets face challenges from increased input costs and declining sentiment, affecting stock performance and profit margins.

Federal Reserve Governor Adriana Kugler noted the complex economic scenario, mentioning that while headline GDP fell by 0.3%, private domestic final purchases (PDFP) increased by 3%, indicating underlying strength. Yet, early indications of inflation due to tariffs and waning confidence point to future challenges.

Markets encounter dual risks: tariffs potentially sparking inflation by increasing input costs, especially in goods, while diminishing sentiment and slowing real incomes may dampen demand. This scenario complicates the Fed’s outlook—persistent inflation pressures coincide with rising unemployment. Rate-sensitive sectors might experience negative impacts from a stagflationary risk profile, and manufacturing input costs and supply chain adjustments could further strain margins.

Key Metrics

– GDP: -0.3%
– PDFP: +3.0%
– Regional Fed surveys and ISM data show rising input costs in goods.
– Consumer sentiment declines despite high retail sales.

Real income and asset value declines may further suppress demand, and productivity might drop due to supply chain reshoring. The Fed could face inflationary pressure from tariffs amidst labor market weakness, reducing chances of substantial rate cuts. Defensive sectors may gain favour due to demand challenges, as manufacturing and consumer cyclical margins remain pressured.

What we’ve seen so far reveals a mixed economic picture. Although the headline GDP figure indicates a contraction of 0.3%, which on its face might seem worrying, the 3% rise in private domestic final purchases tells a different story. That latter measure strips away the noise and gets closer to the core engine of consumer and business spending within borders. While that kind of data strength might typically suggest momentum, we’re now caught between two opposing trends — higher costs clouding the supply side and shaky confidence threatening the demand side.

TariffRelated Inflation and Consumer Sentiment

Kugler’s comments lend weight to the less visible but quite real threat of tariff-related inflation. Input costs, particularly in goods-heavy sectors, are starting to creep up. This coincides with growing evidence from regional surveys and ISM data. Rising prices at an earlier stage in the production process rarely stay contained. Eventually, margin pressures start building for manufacturers, and those get passed along the chain.

Meanwhile, another issue lurks in the form of weakening consumer sentiment. It has slipped, despite retail sales holding up. The risk here isn’t just about current spending — it’s the future pullback that might follow as people reassess their financial position. Drops in real income and asset prices can erode willingness to spend even if headline numbers haven’t yet turned. Such shifts often lag behind sentiment data but can arrive more forcefully when they do.

In that sense, we’re navigating a set of conditions that resembles a stagflationary outline. Inflation impulses from cost-side shocks are meeting weaker labour demand and possible productivity erosion, partly linked to supply chain changes like reshoring initiatives. These aren’t theoretical concerns — the impact is taking shape in margin compression and reduced pricing power, particularly in areas that rely heavily on discretionary income or global sourcing.

For those analysing rate-sensitive exposure, it’s important not to bank on an aggressive shift downward in interest rates. The Federal Reserve might find itself constrained — inflation that clings on due to tariffs complicates the easing path, even as unemployment cools off hiring. That leaves less room to manoeuvre.

With the demand side wobbling and supply-side costs inching higher, these conditions often reward stability-oriented strategies. Some sectors that rely less on economic elasticity and more on steady cash flows can provide a cushion when both growth and margins are in question. Meanwhile, parts of manufacturing and consumer-linked industries will likely face another wave of adjustments, particularly where import costs and price sensitivity cannot be easily offset.

What we can take from these shifts is a reminder that not all inflation is driven by overheating demand. Sometimes, it comes hand-in-hand with softness elsewhere. And when that happens, it restricts central banks more than it helps. These dislocations may not unwind quickly, which could mean certain price indices stay stubborn, even if headline activity softens. It’s a difficult environment for clear directional conviction; reactions may need to be more tactical than trend-following in the near term.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Canadian Dollar is trading flat against the US Dollar as it consolidates recent losses incurred after the Federal Reserve’s announcement. This week has seen yield spreads widen against the CAD, driven by a reassessment of the central bank’s policy outlook and expectations regarding Federal Reserve actions.

The Bank of Canada’s Financial Stability Report, released Thursday, pointed to various risks, such as the effects of trade tensions on Canadian banks and consumers. Other concerns include the implications of upcoming mortgage renewals in a high-rate environment and the rising role of hedge funds in the Canadian government bond market.

Domestic Jobs Report Focus

Attention is turning to Friday’s domestic jobs report, predicting a 5,000 increase in jobs and a slight rise in unemployment. The USD/CAD pair has broken its long-held range, facing resistance near the 1.39 level, around the 61.8% retracement of its prior rally.

Market momentum is neutral, with the Relative Strength Index just under 50. Continued gains may encounter resistance at the 1.40 psychological level, with support expected between 1.3880 and 1.3850.

The data above lays out a quiet but loaded moment for those watching the Canadian Dollar. Price movement has stalled somewhat, squeezing near technical barriers. That’s usually a signal worth watching, especially when it coincides with a build-up of broader market hesitation.

Shifting Policy Expectations

In simple terms, we’ve just seen policy expectations shift in favour of the US side. Interest rate differentials—how much more the US pays on money vs Canada—are widening again. This isn’t exactly new, but it’s moved fast enough to send a message. Think of it like a slow tide leaning south: not rushing, but steady. Traders should pay close attention when the flows and forward expectations lean together like this. It’s not always clean, but when rates move, currencies tend to follow.

The Bank of Canada’s report added some colour to this broader picture. Not directly market-moving in a headline-grabbing sense, but layered with caution around credit and leverage. Mortgage pressures are building under the surface, especially as higher refinancing costs work their way through the household sector. Add in concerns around hedge funds becoming more active in sovereign debt markets, and it starts to become clearer why there’s a sensitivity around yields.

Now, when statistics come into play—like the domestic employment data due Friday—the reactions can be sharp. A forecast of 5,000 jobs being added does not suggest a tight market. Even the slight increase in unemployment being mentioned flags the possibility that Canada may not be immune to the softness we’re seeing creep into other developed markets. Ahead of that release, there’s little fresh fuel for optimism. That doesn’t make the currency directionless, just more responsive to surprises.

Technicals agree: USD/CAD broke above an old range it was confined in for some time. That sparked renewed attention. The resistance near 1.39 matches a historical retracement level from earlier rallies. It’s where older money had paused before. When prices return to these spots, they often do so with intent. If you’re watching from a momentum angle, RSI floating under 50 suggests the energy is neither strongly with buyers nor sellers, so entries should be more selective, ideally aligning with data or decision points.

We expect traders to keep one eye firmly planted at the 1.40 mark—not because it’s magical, but because it’s a round number that traders like to lean against. If breached convincingly, it would shake loose a lot of defensive positioning. On the flip side, dips into the 1.3880–1.3850 corridor might bring in two-way interest, as some try building early exposure on pullbacks, especially with implied volatility relatively tame.

So, over the coming sessions, look less at the headlines and more at how price reacts around those technical levels in combination with unexpected data releases. Staying nimble remains valuable here, especially if yields continue diverging and economic prints drift from forecasts.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

In a recent statement, Trump suggested an 80% tariff on China might be appropriate. This contrasts with earlier reports, which indicated the US might reduce tariffs to 50-54%.

The decision rests with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who leads trade negotiations with China. This sentiment suggests a more assertive stance in trade discussions.

Trump’s Comment on Tariff Level

That comment—an 80 percent tariff—sits markedly above the previously floated reduction level of around 50 to 54 percent. When juxtaposed, the shift hints at a sharpened posture. While the earlier figures suggested a tempered easing of existing trade levies, recent talk from the former president pushes in the opposite direction entirely.

Bessent finds himself in a difficult position. On one hand, there’s pressure to maintain a hard line, possibly to preserve political appeal or negotiation leverage. On the other, market stability and international relationships hang in the balance. A move as steep as 80 percent could trigger retaliation, heighten import costs and weigh on supply chain continuity—especially in technology and consumer goods.

From a trading perspective, we interpret such rhetoric as not yet policy, but nonetheless worthy of close tracking. Responses in futures pricing and the CNY/USD forward curve already hint that risk is being priced differently, albeit moderately for now. Volatility has edged up in relevant sectors.

Focus has narrowed on consumer electronics, industrials and semi-finished goods—imports heavily sensitive to tariff fluctuations. If Bessent leans closer to the former president’s position, the implied pressure on Asian manufacturing output and input costs would rise quickly. That would not stay confined stateside.

Market Reactions and Impacts

As we run through scenario modelling, it’s not just spot impacts we’re watching. Options positioning on major indices has already begun adjusting. There’s been net premium gain in OTM puts for SPY and NDX, while implied correlation has ticked up across sector ETFs. The defensive redo isn’t wholesale yet, but it suggests hedges are being renewed. Near-dated options in particular have grown disproportionately more expensive.

From a pricing perspective, base-case assumptions on policymaking timelines may need compressing. We thought the tariff debate would play out over two quarters. That may accelerate. The unofficial positioning of Bessent as final arbiter—at least for now—means that liquidity spikes could emerge around unscheduled statements or leaks from the Treasury. We’ve seen that pattern establish before.

Where implied vol is underestimating the risk, skew is offering partial cover—but less so as demand drifts further out on the curve. Equities linked directly to exporters are not fully dislocated yet, and that disconnect rarely lasts long. Watch proxy exposures as well in commodities and EM FX. Copper has been particularly reactive to China dialogue in prior cycles.

Any whiff of a retaliatory stance from Beijing would shift outcomes further from consensus. There’s no indication so far, but that doesn’t mean we can lean on assumptions made three or four weeks ago. Sensitivities aren’t theoretical here—they impact pricing flow directly.

Delay in tariff policy clarification forces us to rotate towards shorter-dated derivatives, keeping duration deliberately reduced until position density and headline risk abate. There’s usefulness in staying agile. Directional conviction isn’t premature, but patience on size is essential.

We track correlation clusters across asset classes to avoid over-hedging regions of the book where overlap exaggerates exposure. Think carefully about where you sit in the risk transmission chain. Even modest shifts in trade policy language have triggered revaluations of credit risk in Asian corporates tied to exports. Multiple desks are paring long carry trades in emerging markets.

While headlines may fluctuate, action in derivative volumes gives us better ground truth. Watch delta hedging activity in indices and large tech names over the next two weeks—it’s a better signal for aggregate viewpoint than the front page. Sometimes clarity arrives first through the order book, not a podium.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Kazakhstan is maintaining higher than agreed oil production levels and does not plan to reduce output in May. The Kazakh Energy Ministry reports that daily production, including condensates, is expected to be 277 thousand tons, similar to April’s output.

In March, production was at 260 thousand tons per day, amounting to more than 2 million barrels daily in April and May. Condensates make up approximately 260 thousand barrels per day, indicating crude oil production is around 1.75 million barrels daily.

Production Levels and Future Implications

The agreed ceiling for May would be exceeded by about 300 thousand barrels per day if compensatory cuts are not considered. This situation may lead Saudi Arabia to advocate for increased oil production in July, posing further risks to oil prices.

The data confirms Kazakhstan’s intention to stay above its assigned target for oil output, with no plans to pull back in May. Daily production—factoring in both crude oil and lighter condensates—is holding steady at roughly 277 thousand tonnes, matching the April rate. This figure translates into a little over 2 million barrels per day, split between about 260 thousand barrels of condensates, and the remainder being crude oil. What this means is that Kazakhstan is currently yielding around 1.75 million barrels of crude each day.

Now, according to the limits set under the broader producer agreement, their ceiling for May would place them roughly 300 thousand barrels per day above quota—unless they offset it with future reductions, often referred to as compensatory cuts. There is, however, no clear movement yet in that direction.

This discrepancy places added weight on upcoming discussions among broader producer groups. One of the larger producers, Saudi Arabia, could interpret this divergence as license to push for more generous output allowances beginning in July. Such thinking might not be universally accepted, but from their perspective, if others are not sticking tightly to limits, there’s more flexibility at play than previously acknowledged.

Market Reactions and Strategic Positioning

For traders in derivatives linked to crude benchmarks, this is another tilt in the balance of supply expectations. When market participants observe one key member raising output without firm consequence, it sets a precedent that others may follow or view as leverage. We must be alert to the rhythm of these signals, as they influence near-term volatility and shape hedging decisions.

Prices could come under added pressure if Saudi Arabia’s support for increasing production finds traction among allies. Some may argue that rising supply should coincide with strong demand fundamentals, but those metrics are not aligned at present. Demand forecasts, while still growing, remain modest and uneven by region. China’s draw on imports has been slowing, and stockpiles in the U.S. are not falling as swiftly as some expected.

For those of us following backwardation or contango movements in the futures curve, it’s worth watching how traders interpret these possible supply shifts. Widening spreads between front and later months could reflect softening near-term demand or expectations of supply outpacing consumption. Any sudden reversals there may suggest repositioning is unfolding.

Putting it simply, inaction on output restraint from Kazakhstan nudges the rest of the group into a more delicate spot. If enforcement of limits is seen as weak or inconsistent, that may force reassessment of strategic positions. We’re entering a stretch where each country’s actions are being weighed more heavily, not only in physical flows but also in pricing structures across derivatives markets. Those exposed to these movements need to stay nimble, but more than that, they must be decisive when key shifts become clear.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.