The major US indices saw gains, with the NASDAQ index rising by 1.61%. This was influenced by expected CPI data showing a 0.2% increase, below the 0.3% expectation.

The S&P index has moved to a positive 0.08% on the year. The NASDAQ index now trails its 2024 closing level by 1.56%, while the Dow industrial average is down by 0.95%.

Impact Of Unitedhealth On The Dow

On the trading day, the Dow industrial average dropped 269.67 points, or 0.64%, to 42140.43. UnitedHealth’s sharp decrease of 17.83% impacted the Dow after the CEO’s resignation and absence of future guidance.

In contrast, the S&P index climbed 45.36 points, or 0.72%, ending at 5886.55. The NASDAQ rose 301.74 points, or 1.61%, finishing at 19010.08, while the Russell 2000 increased by 10.15 points, or 0.49%, reaching 2102.34.

Notable gainers included First Solar at 22.63%, Super Micro Computer at 15.99%, and Robinhood Markets at 8.93%. Other companies such as Palantir and Rocket each experienced an 8.10% increase, with ETH/USD rising by 7.44%.

We’ve just witnessed an upward move in US equities, most of it driven by softer consumer price inflation data. The monthly rise of 0.2% came in below expectations and hinted at a possible easing of pressure on monetary policy. This translated quickly into positive sentiment across several indices. But while two of the major benchmarks ended the day higher, not all sectors moved in the same direction.

Sector And Market Dynamics

What we’re looking at is more than just a daily volatility swing. Gains in tech-heavy names helped push the NASDAQ upwards by over 300 points, which signals that investor enthusiasm may still be skewed toward growth stocks—particularly those with perceived ties to artificial intelligence and clean energy. These pockets of strength underscore a broader theme: risk appetite has not disappeared. But it’s worth noting where certain weak points remain.

The modest year-to-date gain in the S&P suggests that larger, more diversified names may be struggling to find momentum. Financials and healthcare, for example, remain under pressure. Meanwhile, the drop in the Dow was largely due to a sharp tumble in a single heavyweight name. When one constituent makes up a disproportionate amount of the index’s weight and loses nearly 18%, that’s enough to drag down the average—even if other names are flat or rising. So it wasn’t broad weakness, but rather a concentrated one.

Looking at the Russell 2000, a small-cap index, the move higher aligns with a modest reflationary tone, possibly sparked by easing bond yields or revised expectations around future rate hikes. We need to continue watching how these smaller companies react, since they are more sensitive to changes in the lending environment.

Winners such as Super Micro and First Solar reflect a preference for innovation-led themes—both are seen as plays on forward-looking investment trends. When these stocks jump this sharply, it suggests traders are pricing in stronger demand, improved margins, or both. It also highlights where market momentum is currently pooling: we’re seeing quick moves into names that represent shifts in broader industry thinking, such as energy storage or decentralised computing.

Meanwhile, digital assets stepped back into focus, with ETH/USD registering a gain of more than 7%. That’s more than just a coincidence; it’s tethered not only to flows but also to the sense that some corners of the market are starting to discount tighter monetary conditions in the near term. This ties neatly into current leveraged swap flows we’re observing, which are not yet extreme, but are tilting toward the long side in correlation with growth proxies.

For traders of volatility and derivatives, it’s essential to reassess positioning relative to sector performance rather than relying solely on index-level movement. With divergences this wide, implied vol in some single names or specific baskets may offer better opportunities than broader measures like the VIX or SKEW.

This is where we need to return to basics. How do individual components behave against macro inputs like CPI surprises, rate expectations, or geopolitical noise? And more importantly, where is mispricing most visible? Compression in vol surfaces for growth-heavy sectors provides opportunity—especially when paired with catalysts either already confirmed or expected soon.

Let’s keep attention on earnings readouts coming from these high-beta sectors. Risks now seem more idiosyncratic than systemic, marked by abrupt responses to changes in guidance or leadership. These gaps widen during tight monetary conditions, with option premiums often misaligned with realised movement. There’s yield to be found—but only by selectively choosing what to sell and where to take on directional exposure.

In short, the better-than-forecast CPI data has opened a brief window for momentum to reassert itself. But the window narrows quickly if macro data runs hot again. In that scenario, safe-haven rotation may sharpen, turning lower beta names and staple-heavy ETFs into outsized beneficiaries.

These are moments to lean into relative value rather than outright directional bets. Let’s stay focused on dispersion and hedge where skew becomes too aggressive.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The US Dollar Index (DXY) dropped to 101.50 after US CPI inflation for April cooled to 2.3% annually, contrary to expected forecasts. Core inflation remained steady at 2.8%, fostering speculation of a potential Federal Reserve rate cut by September 2025, with easing anticipated through 2026.

Uncertainties have emerged from vague trade commitments with China and the UK, accompanied by ambitious tax and investment plans from President Trump that lack economic impact details. Despite a tariff reduction headline, effective rates on Chinese goods exceed 40%, leading to scepticism about the recent trade deal’s permanence.

Bearish Tendencies and Support and Resistance Levels

The US Dollar Index showed bearish tendencies, trading around 101.00, with the Relative Strength Index and Ultimate Oscillator in neutral territory. Momentum indicators suggest short-term selling pressure, with collective moving averages indicating a broader bearish trend. Support levels are found at 100.94, 100.73, and 100.63, while resistance is identified at 101.42, 101.94, and 101.98.

The economic tensions between the US and China, referred to as a trade war, stemmed from extreme protectionism and tariffs initiated by President Trump in 2018. Recently reignited by Trump’s return to office in 2025, this ongoing conflict places pressure on global supply chains and impacts spending, indirectly affecting CPI inflation.

With headline inflation falling below expectations to 2.3%, while core remains anchored at 2.8%, markets have interpreted this disinflation as a step closer to eventual easing by the Federal Reserve. Although the central bank continues to signal patience, pricing now leans more decisively towards a cut after the summer of 2025. That timing reveals something specific—investors now see fewer barriers to reintroducing risk into rate-sensitive assets.

Traders in interest rate and FX derivatives have reacted promptly. Option skews in the short end of the U.S. rates curve suggest an increased appetite for downside protection, showing that there’s hedging in place for another drop in the dollar. We’ve also seen volatility premiums rise mildly in the two-year Treasury swaption space, pointing to a shift in sentiment towards more aggressive rate repricing. These reactions aren’t without basis. With momentum metrics signalling overextension in recent dollar rallies, there appears little technical appetite for a broader reversal upward.

Trade Announcements and Their Impact

Powell’s remarks, though restrained in tone, haven’t countered these expectations either. The market no longer trusts rhetoric alone but appears to be weighting hard numbers more heavily now—especially as unemployment starts showing cracks and PCE tracks south quietly.

In parallel, the optimism around trade announcements has quickly worn off. Lighthizer’s latest commentary did little to clarify tariff mechanics or timelines, despite headline proclamations. The effective duty rate on imported Chinese steel, for example, remains above pre-2020 levels, making it hard to view any tariff talk as policy softening. These mixed signals inject unwelcome uncertainty into hedging strategies, particularly in USD/CNH and GBP/USD options, where implied vols have begun ticking upward. Resistance in DXY at 101.94 absorbs any shallow rebounds, making patience key when selecting re-entry points.

The retracement in DXY to 101.00 now carries weight, with some algo-driven strategies triggering down to strong support near 100.63. These mechanical sell layers tend to exaggerate moves once momentum rolls, which remains a risk here. More so as liquidity is thinner than usual, given summer desks are under-resourced and exposure trims are already underway across macro books.

Delving deeper into the technicals, convergence of the longer-term exponential moving averages points to prolonged downside pressure. RSI and Ultimate Oscillator may look neutral, but price action below the 200-day moving average keeps sentiment constrained. Unless we see a meaningful deviation in incoming data—most likely through jobless claims or the next core PCE print—we shouldn’t expect this dollar softness to reverse in the near term. That tempers any strategy relying on short-term dollar recovery.

Among the contributing forces, Beijing remains opaque in its policy response. Hints of potential retaliatory measures against fresh U.S. tariffs circulate, yet confirmation is absent. This leaves energy prices and industrial inputs exposed, which indirectly re-surfaces in inflation-linked asset classes. We’ve noticed breakevens on five-year TIPS move erratically, particularly as hedge funds shift out of bullish reflation trades in commodities. Such moves usually bring sharp reactions in dollar-based derivatives—especially those tied to real rates.

Watching the 100.73 level on DXY becomes essential; a breach there could spark another round of defensive repositioning in both leveraged FX and macro fixed income strategies. We’ve already encountered early unwinds in structured carry trades dependent on USD strength, particularly those against higher-yielding EM currencies. That suggests growing unease about dollar demand holding up into Q3.

Trump’s policy stance, albeit declared with confidence, remains fuzzy on execution. Tax and infrastructure ambitions provide headlines, but bond traders continue to demand wider term premia, reflecting doubts over fiscal discipline. The knock-on effect on longer-tenor yields has been subtle but persistent. This steepening bias affects swap spreads, indirectly pressuring forward guidance expectations via OIS curves.

Through it all, shorter maturity dollar swaps and eurodollar futures display increased sensitivity to minor shifts in inflation data and forward guidance commentary. And for now, implied volatility surfaces in FX skew firmly to the downside.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US April core CPI matched expectations at +2.8% year-over-year, resulting in a decline for the US dollar. The market saw a modest initial reaction, but the decline in the dollar became more pronounced as the day progressed. Global developments included the US reducing tariffs on China, a move confirmed by Chinese authorities, and further economic sanctions imposed by the US on Iran.

In other news, Trump urged the Federal Reserve to cut rates, while the New York Fed reported a significant increase in student loan delinquencies in the first quarter. The European Central Bank’s (ECB) Knot noted uncertainty’s negative impact on inflation and growth. Goldman Sachs now speculates the ECB’s terminal rate could reach 1.75% by July.

Commodity Markets Strength

Commodity markets showed strength with WTI crude oil rising to $63.68 and gold climbing by $15 to $3248. Stock markets also saw gains, with a 0.8% increase in the S&P 500, while US 10-year yields rose to 4.48%. In foreign exchange, the Australian dollar led gains, while the US dollar lagged, influenced by evolving Fed rate cut expectations and changes in investor sentiment.

The published consumer price index data for April, specifically the core measure which excludes food and energy, came in right on forecast at a 2.8% annual pace. No surprises there, and under typical conditions, such figures wouldn’t rattle markets this much. But the downward shift in the US dollar highlighted how expectations had quietly crept higher among traders in recent weeks. So when the figures failed to beat, the dollar softened — and not just briefly. As hours passed, markets leaned into the idea that the Federal Reserve may, in fact, resume thinking about rate cuts sooner than they’d previously let on.

In the background, Washington’s decision to scale back tariffs on Chinese imports was met with confirmation from Beijing – a rare moment of bilateral calm. The timing of the announcement matters. It came amid an otherwise complicated mix of pressure on Iran, as the White House rolled out fresh rounds of sanctions, largely focused on financial transactions tied to the petroleum sector. These measures shift capital flows and tend to raise the geopolitical risk premium in oil and gold – especially on volatile trading desks.

Former president Trump has once again taken to the media to critique the Federal Reserve, pushing for lower rates. Regardless of political motivations, this public pressure introduces yet another variable for markets to digest. Meanwhile, over in Manhattan, data from the New York Fed is pointing to rising stress in the financial system – notably with sharp growth in student loan delinquencies. These delinquencies undermine assumptions about household balance sheets, which had been recovering steadily since the pandemic. This is data with potential long-term implications, particularly for bond and credit markets.

European Central Bank and Commodities

Back in Europe, Knot of the ECB weighed in, making it clear that persistent uncertainty is holding back both inflation and broader economic activity. We’ve seen forecasts from Goldman Sachs reflect this concern, with their projections now putting the ECB’s highest policy rate at 1.75% by midsummer. That’s a clear shift from earlier projections and deserves close attention as it intersects with income strategies in the euro market.

On the commodity front, oil and gold moved upward, reflecting both the regional tension and a broader appetite for tangible assets in uncertain times. With WTI crude pressing beyond $63 and gold jumping another $15 to $3,248, the energy and metals space is acting as a barometer for financial anxiety. Broadly speaking, we tend to see these moves when traders look for safer ground, though some bids are clearly pure momentum.

Equities followed suit with a measured push higher – the S&P tracking up almost a full percent. Risk was being embraced, and that’s important, especially as US 10-year Treasury yields crept up to 4.48%. Higher yields typically weigh on equity pricing, but this week’s market tone suggests a broader reassessment of macro conditions, particularly around disinflation trends and future rate paths.

In FX, dynamics were more telling than in previous sessions. The Australian dollar was the day’s outperformer while the greenback trailed behind. This rotation is a product of clear shifts in interest rate differentials. With the Fed’s next moves now in question, and inflation showing less persistence than feared, traders are recalibrating carry strategies – rotating away from the dollar in favour of currencies supported by relatively upbeat domestic data or better policy clarity.

For those positioned in derivative markets, few signals came without context. Pricing discrepancies need to be watched closely in coming sessions. What appears stable may not remain so, especially as implied volatility metrics begin to diverge across asset classes. Reaction times could shorten. It’s essential now to concentrate not just on the obvious indicators, but those smaller signals driving reopening themes, balance sheet shifts, or pricing anomalies in the rates curve. The window for low-delta rebalancing seems narrow – something to take seriously as the calendar moves towards quarter-end.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Canadian Dollar (CAD) gained slightly on Tuesday, primarily due to a decrease in US Dollar (USD) demand across the market. With low-tier data available, the Canadian Dollar’s movement this week depends heavily on market sentiment.

The end of US “reciprocal tariffs” is approaching, with no clear trade deal details in sight, which creates uncertainty for Canadian exports. USD/CAD dropped below the 1.3950 level, influenced by easing US Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation, although future data might reflect tariff effects.

Key Indicators

US Producer Price Index (PPI) and Consumer Sentiment data are expected later in the week. The Canadian Dollar reversed a losing streak, pushing USD/CAD down further, but high headline risks for traders remain due to uncertain trends.

Key drivers for the Canadian Dollar include Bank of Canada interest rates, Oil prices, economic health, inflation, and trade balance. Higher interest rates and Oil prices generally strengthen CAD, while weaker economic data can lead to CAD depreciation. The US economy also plays a vital role due to the trading relationship between the US and Canada.

The Bank of Canada influences CAD through interest rate adjustments, affecting inflation and economic stability. Oil prices directly impact CAD value, with higher prices bolstering it, while lower prices cause depreciation. Macroeconomic data releases, such as GDP and employment figures, provide insights into the economy and can sway CAD direction.

As we’ve seen, the Canadian Dollar (CAD) has managed to scrape back some ground following weeks of declines, driven more by the retreat of the US Dollar (USD) than by any fresh domestic catalyst. This isn’t unusual. In times when domestic economic indicators are thin, shifts in CAD often reflect broader global flows, particularly changes in risk appetite and sentiment around the US economy. The current move down in USD/CAD, which took the pair below the 1.3950 mark, wasn’t so much due to new Canadian strength, but more in reaction to softening US Consumer Price Index figures. Lower inflation expectations from the US can shift interest rate forecasts, which in turn weaken the greenback, and that’s what we’re watching unfold.

However, there’s a lurking element that could create fresh disturbances soon—reciprocal tariffs between the US and Canada are expiring imminently, but we’ve not yet seen a comprehensive outline of any replacement terms or trade agreements. This lack of information leaves traders exposed to surprising tariff-related headlines, making it harder to price risk effectively. Export-heavy sectors in Canada could be particularly vulnerable, which might then feed into GDP and manufacturing data, weakening CAD if trade slows.

Later this week, we’re anticipating fresh data prints from the US in the form of the Producer Price Index along with revised consumer sentiment readings. These will matter more than usual. If producer-side inflation comes in hotter, it could reignite policy tightening discussions from the US Fed, pushing the USD sharply higher again. On the other hand, any soft data would likely reinforce the view that rates have peaked, and may stay steady or even start to ease in the months ahead. Either of those outcomes has short-term implications for currency pairs like USD/CAD, making it a potentially reactive period in trading.

Looking Ahead

Policymakers in Ottawa remain a back-pocket concern: the Bank of Canada continues to hold the credibility of forward guidance, and even subtle shifts in their tone can nudge the market. At the same time, global oil prices have stabilised somewhat, but we remain alert—a sudden rally in crude, fuelled by production cuts or geopolitical disruptions, could send CAD higher. Remember, the currency maintains a strong correlation to oil given its large export component.

We’re watching the macro data as well: employment numbers, retail spending, and growth updates all have the capacity to make or break the short-term trends. It’s also worth acknowledging that Canadian fundamentals must be measured not in isolation, but against expectations. A mediocre job print might still be CAD-positive if it beats forecasts in a pessimistic backdrop.

The trading relationship between Canada and the US underpins a large chunk of CAD’s pricing. If US growth slows and Fed rate expectations drift lower, that could give CAD a relative edge, particularly if domestic conditions in Canada hold steady. This cross-border dynamic reinforces the importance of assimilating both nations’ economic paths when modelling price expectations.

Volatility could increase from here—headline risk is layered with fundamental pressure. Price levels like 1.3850 and 1.4000 could see repeated tests. We’re positioning for potential whipsaws, until more certainty emerges through data or policy developments.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

China has expressed disapproval of a trade agreement between the UK and the US. The country worries that the deal might limit Chinese products in British supply chains.

Beijing articulated that agreements between nations should not aim to exclude other countries. They emphasised adherence to this “basic principle” in international dealings.

International Trade Dynamics

This diplomatic reaction from Beijing points to a growing awareness of how international trade agreements ripple beyond the immediate signatories. The concern, in this case, centres on whether the pact could subtly reshape access to markets and influence sourcing decisions—particularly for nations not directly involved. By singling out the concept of exclusion, the Chinese government is making a broader commentary on emerging trade alliances and how they might be used to create spheres of preferential economic influence.

What’s important in the context of this development is how it reframes the way cross-border supply frameworks are being structured. Not as purely commercial dynamics, but increasingly with strategic considerations folded into them. With supply chains often serving as indirect mechanisms for asserting economic influence, any shift in their composition—whether caused by tariffs, trade rules, or geopolitical recalibration—becomes immediately relevant.

For us, this puts further weight behind paying attention not only to tariffs or headline trade volumes, but to the subtler terms embedded in deals: clauses about origin, joint ventures, technology definitions, regulatory harmonisation. Individually, these may appear benign; collectively, they can signal shifts that alter flow direction and transaction preference.

Potential Market Repercussions

Savvy positioning over the next several weeks may lie in closer observation of commodity-linked agreements tied to Anglo-American trade flows. These could begin to show early reordering in volume expectations or component sourcing. Markets may begin to price in potential preference away from certain suppliers, especially if procurement policies become politicised.

Moreover, Liu’s pointed remarks about inclusion serve more as a warning of broader fatigue with selective commercial bloc-building—and may form the basis for gradual recalibration in export strategy, subsidies targeting Western markets, or even countermeasures in parallel agreements elsewhere.

In our view, this creates a valuable short-term window to monitor potential changes in FX hedging behaviour from East Asia, and reoptimise exposure to sensitive inputs—particularly in sectors where supply elasticity is low, and demand is project-based.

The tone of the message sent from the Chinese capital also suggests that further commentary will likely follow. Regular communication from trade officials can set expectations for market participants, especially those dealing in shipping, industrial manufacturing, and raw material contracts. In those cases, brief anticipatory shifts in volatility may offer targeted opportunities, if leveraged with care.

As hedging postures tighten globally, paying keener attention to diplomatic signalling like this may improve insight into where sourcing pressure might arise next—and by extension, where medium-term spread adjustments could begin forming at the contract level.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The US Dollar gave up a large portion of its Monday gains as markets evaluated the effects of the latest US-China trade deal. Speculation persists that the Federal Reserve could reduce interest rates in the third quarter due to easing inflationary pressures.

The Dollar Index retreated to the 101.00 region driven by improved sentiment among risk-linked assets. In contrast, EUR/USD recovered from multi-week lows, reaching the 1.1180 zone as the US Dollar weakened.

Currencies and Economic Indicators

In the UK, GBP/USD climbed above 1.3300 amid a stronger performance in riskier assets. The UK is set to release several economic data points, including GDP growth rate and various production figures.

USD/JPY slipped to around 147.40 after reaching seven-week highs prior. Australia’s currency managed to exceed the 0.6400 mark, recovering from earlier losses, with upcoming data on home loans and wage prices.

WTI oil prices rose for the fourth consecutive day, nearing $64.00 per barrel due to trader optimism. Gold traded within a narrow range around $3,240, while silver receded to $32.50 after an initial increase.

The earlier rally in the US Dollar proved short-lived, with Monday’s surge largely unraveled by Tuesday as optimism surrounding trade discussions between Washington and Beijing picked up. Investors pared back defensive bets, turning instead to higher-yielding assets. With inflation cues softening, there’s increasing confidence across markets that the Federal Reserve might consider loosening policy in the next quarter. While such decisions are still data-dependent, clarity around current inflation dynamics adds weight to a shift in expectations.

The Dollar Index slipping towards 101.00 reflected investors rotating out of the greenback into assets offering stronger return potential. Currencies commonly tied to growth bounced in response – the euro clawed back losses as buyers emerged near longer-term support territory, sending EUR/USD back through the 1.1180 level. This move underscores the Dollar’s sensitivity to softening US economic indicators and mounting rate-cut forecasts.

Market Trends and Strategies

Sterling rose past 1.3300, finding support from both risk sentiment and anticipation around key economic figures this week. These are expected to offer fresh insight into whether growth in the UK economy is reviving or remains sluggish. Depending on how those figures land, implied volatility may stretch further, particularly in shorter-dated forward contracts.

Meanwhile, the yen finally gained footing following a sustained climb in USD/JPY, pulling the pair back to around 147.40. The correction in part came from a softening in Treasury yields, and in part from positioning unwinds after the earlier rise. Australian dollar gains were more moderate, but still material — above 0.6400 — as investors looked ahead to numbers focused on credit and wage growth, both of which remain critical to how the RBA will proceed in its next meeting.

Commodities showed diverging paths. WTI crude extended its streak, rising for a fourth session in a row and nearing $64.00, with traders seemingly betting that broader demand will lean higher as growth conditions stabilise. On the metals side, gold stayed in tight territory near $3,240 — suggesting neutrality from a positioning standpoint. However, silver didn’t hold onto early strength and slipped back to trade near $32.50. This reaction is consistent with declining speculative support seen in recent positioning data.

For us, pricing in macro triggers efficiently remains key. With rate expectations on the move, pairs traditionally sensitive to yield differentials may behave less predictably. Preferred strategies will likely benefit from widening risk parameters and a firmer grasp on regional data surprises, particularly as price action is increasingly being driven by divergence in future policy paths, rather than merely reactive flows.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The NZDUSD has been climbing after sellers were unable to maintain a break below the 0.5825 swing area and the 200-bar moving average on the 4-hour chart. From the reversal of the dip yesterday, buyers have regained control, driving the pair above key technical levels.

The pair has surpassed several resistance points, including the 200-day moving average at 0.5883. Additional resistance levels include the 100-hour and 200-hour moving averages at 0.5907 and 0.5835, respectively. The current upward momentum is targeting the 100-bar moving average on the 4-hour chart around 0.5949.

Potential Reach to 06000 and Beyond

A move past 0.5949 could lead to a push towards the next major resistance area near 0.6000. Beyond that, the extremes for 2025 lie between 0.6018 and 0.6028.

Yesterday and earlier today, sellers attempted to take control, but the trend is currently favouring buyers. The key technical levels for resistance and support are 0.59494, 0.6000, 0.6018 to 0.6028, and 0.5935, 0.5907, 0.5883, and 0.58525, respectively. The market sentiment appears to be shifting back towards buyers after sellers were unable to capitalise.

What we’ve just observed in the NZDUSD is a short-term repricing after an earlier push lower failed to gather the required momentum to sustain further declines. The inability of sellers to remain below the 0.5825 level – which coincides with the 200-bar moving average on the 4-hour timeframe – served as a signal that downside conviction was weakening. When that level held, we started to see a rebound gather pace.

Since then, we’ve seen the move kick through layers of resistance, initially the 200-day moving average – a longer-term indication – at 0.5883, followed by swift gains that cleared both the 100-hour and 200-hour markers. These short-term averages tend to reflect more reactive sentiment and provide a solid gauge of intraday positioning. Going through those suggests that the short-term tone has turned favourable for bullish action.

Direction and Support Levels

Now the focus sits at around 0.5949, which aligns with the 100-bar average on the 4-hour chart. Reaching and holding above that level would indicate that recent buying isn’t just a corrective bounce but something with deeper traction. Assuming buying can sustain at or beyond that mark, we could see continued extension towards 0.6000. Once that’s cleared, there’s not much resistance until the range between 0.6018 to 0.6028 comes back into play – a structure previously tested and rejected, representing a proper battle line if reached again.

From a directional bias standpoint, it’s clear: buyers have taken the reins, and price action is rewarding those aligned with that short-term narrative. Reactions at around 0.5949 and then again towards the psychological 0.6000 zone may offer insight into how committed this move is.

Support levels aren’t just markers where price might pause; they are where behaviour shifts can occur if buyers step away. We’ve got these layered between 0.5935, 0.5907, and 0.5883, with more depth back down at 0.58525. Should any sharp moves lower appear, we’d expect some positioning reset within those bands in the near term.

Miller’s commentary, which formed part of the original analysis, highlighted the failed breakout of the downside and noted how that set off a mechanical unwind from short positions. That seems to be evident in the way price has moved quite cleanly through each resistance level. Meanwhile, Powell acknowledged the upward tilt in momentum and made it especially clear that we’re now dealing with a market that no longer sees value in selling rallies – at least for now.

In this sort of setup, what matters most is how the price responds at resistance markers, especially after such a directional impulse. If there’s a clear stall or hesitation around 0.5949 to 0.6000, that may hint at a near-term exhaustion, but unless price gives up the areas below 0.5883 and 0.58525, the broader setup still prefers strength.

From where we sit, price is respecting structure well. We should act with the chart in front of us, and given recent buying strength, attempts to counter that might need clearer breakdowns before becoming viable. It’s not about predicting turns, but rather responding to where commitment holds.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US Treasury yields surged after a softer-than-expected US inflation report, with the 10-year note yield inching up over two basis points to 4.495%. This softness in April’s Consumer Price Index (CPI) defied expectations of a tariff-driven rise, hinting the May figures might better capture these effects.

The headline CPI rose 0.2% month-on-month, falling short of the anticipated 0.3%. Annually, it increased 2.3%, slightly down from March’s 2.4% and below forecasts.

Impact On Markets

Core CPI saw a 0.2% rise last month, consistent with March’s figures, maintaining a 2.8% year-on-year increase. Meanwhile, real yields climbed to 2.21%, impacting gold prices negatively.

A US-China trade pause led to a downturn in expected Fed rate cuts by reducing duties, affecting traders’ expectations. The market now predicts only 52 basis points of easing, down from the prior 76.

Interest rates, charged by financial institutions on loans, influence currency strength and gold prices. Higher rates make a currency more attractive, but weigh on gold due to increased opportunity costs. The Fed funds rate, a crucial measure in financial markets, shapes monetary policy expectations.

The data released has thrown traders a bit of a curveball. Despite inflation coming in a touch lighter than previously forecasted, Treasury yields unexpectedly edged higher. Typically, we’d expect yields to drift lower when inflation shows signs of cooling. But that didn’t happen here.

Short Term Market Predictions

What this suggests is that while April’s Consumer Price Index may have undershot expectations, markets aren’t confident this will be a long-term trend. There’s a reasonable chance investors are already looking beyond April, wondering whether May or June data will reveal more of the expected pressure from tariffs or supply disruptions—factors that usually take a bit of time to filter through. April’s dip in the headline rate also doesn’t fully erase the broader concern that inflation might be sticky in certain categories, especially at the core level, which refuses to budge below 2.8%.

Real yields—those adjusted for inflation—pushed higher as well, edging closer to multi-year highs. When this happens, it tends to pull liquidity out of some non-yielding assets, especially gold, which saw lower demand as the cost of holding it increased. Given our focus, we’ve seen this feed into option premiums and forward curves in commodity-linked products, particularly those tied to precious metals.

The reduction in expected rate cuts is not a subtle one either. Markets having retraced more than 20 basis points in their Fed easing expectations tells us participants are factoring in a possible delay, or even scaling back, of policy adjustments. The earlier assumption that the Fed might feel comfortable moving soon is no longer in play. Though the Fed hasn’t directly tightened the screws any further, the market is doing some of the heavy lifting for them.

From our view, the market has turned towards a more cautious stance, especially in terms of short-dated rates pricing. Forward curves are flatter, particularly in the 6-to-18-month horizon. Those positioned for steep easing in the latter half of the year are now facing headwinds, with volatility likely to pick up into the FOMC’s next projections update.

Currency desks will be watching incoming data with sharper attention. A stronger dollar, stemming from rising yields and narrower policy differentials, affects carry trades and hedging costs. This movement also underscores a general uptick in risk aversion. In options strategies, skew has begun tilting again as more participants seek downside protection against sudden rate repricing.

This adjustment across the fixed income strip means we need to reassess short gamma positions, particularly in the belly of the curve. While vol remains within familiar bounds, positioning dynamics are shifting. Hedging demand may increase and with US data still the fulcrum for short-term moves, it’s likely we’ll see a further re-adjustment in open interest through the end of the month.

Now that easing bets have been pulled back, attention will return to corporate credit spreads, funding costs, and demand for liquidity across short-term instruments. If real yields continue upward without strong growth data to justify them, stress may show up in risk assets. When evaluating where to allocate or hedge, one can’t ignore the signals now flashing in fixed income pricing.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Crude oil futures have risen to $63.67, marking an increase of $1.72 or 2.78%. This price hike follows an upward trend over five of the last six trading days, increasing by 11.38% since May 5 when it was $57.15.

Today’s closing price is the highest since April 17, which closed at $63.68. The next important price level is the 50% midpoint of the range since April 2020, at $64.71, with recent highs approaching but not surpassing this mark.

Price Rally Driven By Multiple Factors

The price rally is driven by easing trade tensions, a new U.S.–UK deal, and anticipated stronger demand with the U.S. driving season approaching. Yet, rising global supply limits these gains, as OPEC+ adds back 2.2 million barrels per day, and the EIA predicts inventory builds throughout the year.

We’ve seen a rather sharp ascent in crude futures lately, pushing through previous resistance levels with some conviction. Prices have added over $6.50 per barrel in just over a fortnight, a move that stands out not only for its magnitude but also its persistence. Five of the past six sessions closed higher – the sort of stretch that tends to draw attention from short-term traders and forces a reassessment of risk-reward across positions.

The fact that this latest close came one cent shy of the April 17 peak matters more than it might initially appear. When prices flirt with previous highs without yet clearing them, we’re often at one of those stages where technical positioning becomes more heated. Any decisive push beyond that April level would bring into play the 50% retracement of the post-pandemic move — a figure around $64.71 — not because it holds any magical power, but because markets tend to cluster orders near such points. We’ve seen it often enough to understand it lends gravity to price action.

We should not, however, assume this burst upward is unshakable. While factors such as improving trade relations and an upcoming spike in driving season usage have buoyed sentiment, the reality of steady increases in supply clouds the medium-term picture. The OPEC+ producer group is gradually restoring cuts and the U.S. government’s energy body, the EIA, forecasts ongoing inventory accumulation. That’s a poor backdrop for sustaining higher pricing unless demand can overcome those bulges consistently.

Market Sentiment And Trade Strategy

Brennan, who covers global energy flows, has hinted that the broader product market still looks heavy – so even though headline crude is supported, refined products aren’t rallying in lockstep. This narrows refinery margins and may eventually dampen throughput if it continues, especially as summer wears on.

From our corner, reading between the lines, this environment offers a classic setup for traders to lean into shorter-term volatility rather than long directional bets. Bring stops in tighter. Options with near-term expiries, particularly straddles and strangles, could deliver value while markets continue their tug-of-war between softening supply cuts and revived consumption optimism. Delta positioning needs reviewing regularly given headline risk.

As always during phases like this – where price is hugging major inflection points but hasn’t broken clear of them – chart levels gain importance not just for entries, but for exits. We need to stay prepared to unwind swiftly if this lift in futures begins to lose steam — especially once we get clearer inventories data later in the month. If that incoming data confirms the inventories narrative, retracements to lower support bands aren’t just possible; they would likely find limited resistance.

So while the market mood has turned decisively positive in recent days, we remain mindful of the supply-side creep and the execution risk surrounding upcoming macro releases. A careful pair of hands is far better suited than bold conviction at this stage.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

USD/CHF retreated to the support level of 0.8400 after the US Consumer Price Index data for April indicated slower inflation than anticipated. The headline CPI reported a 2.3% year-on-year rise, down from March’s 2.4%, while the core CPI held steady at 2.8%.

The US Dollar Index fell to 101.30 from a recent high of 102.00, amid cooling inflation and ongoing trade concerns. The CME FedWatch tool showed a 61.4% chance of interest rates holding steady at 4.25%-4.50% for July, amidst broader economic worries.

Swiss Franc’s Safe Haven Status

The Swiss Franc strengthened against most major currencies, maintaining a safe-haven status during economic uncertainties. USD/CHF found support near 0.8375, a former key resistance point, as the pair sought stability.

Technical analysis shows USD/CHF nearing critical support of 0.8400, with potential for a bullish trend above the 20-day EMA at 0.8326. Key resistance levels are at 0.8500, while support levels lie at 0.8375, 0.8186, 0.8100, and 0.8040, depending on market dynamics.

The downward move in USD/CHF following the latest CPI release was a reflection of reduced inflation expectations and a tempered outlook on further US Federal Reserve tightening. CPI numbers, particularly the headline figure slipping to 2.3% year-on-year, sharpened the tone for future rate policy. Meanwhile, the core CPI’s steadiness at 2.8% signals stubborn underlying price pressures, potentially complicating the rate path over the summer months. That slight divergence is what caused a softening in the dollar’s positioning.

Movement in the US Dollar Index — easing toward 101.30 — added downward pressure on dollar pairs across the board, including USD/CHF. This drop came shortly after a brief peak at 102.00, which now appears to have been a short-lived reaction to earlier economic surprises. The latest CME FedWatch projections anchored near 61% for a July hold suggest a consensus forming around policy patience.

Market Dynamics And Future Projections

Market participants ought to maintain close attention to rate probabilities, especially those derived from instruments like Fed Funds futures. When futures lean toward a policy pause, dollar strength usually wanes, particularly against currencies that are perceived as stable or low-risk. That dynamic reasserted itself here, with the Franc gaining across several crosses — not solely against the dollar.

Taking the technicals into account, support at 0.8375 has shown resilience — previously acting as resistance — and now marks an area where dip-buying may begin to emerge. For the time being, if we do not see a sustained drop below this level, the broader trading community might look for any catalyst — economic or geopolitical — to rotate flows back into the dollar. The 0.8326 level, which lines up with the 20-day EMA, is a technical zone we are watching closely; a decisive move through it, up or down, would likely invite larger-volume positioning.

Above, the resistance at 0.8500 remains a pivotal short-term ceiling, and it’s unlikely to be taken out without a change in the macro narrative — either through unexpectedly strong US data or a shift in global risk sentiment. That said, movement toward 0.8400 and above should not be assumed unless buyers regain control with conviction.

Support structures further below at 0.8186, 0.8100, and even down to 0.8040 should be considered not merely as technical levels, but triggers for risk recalibration. If the pair drifts below those marks — particularly into the high 0.8100s — longer-term dollar longs could begin unwinding more aggressively, increasing volatility across G10 pairings.

In the near term, a focus remains on whether the current range around 0.8400 holds firm. If it does, price may oscillate in tight steps higher, barring any unexpected data shocks. Alternatively, a slice below it could see a retest of March lows, particularly if Swiss National Bank rhetoric turns more assertive or if upcoming US macro data disappoints further.

We are keeping an eye on bond yields, oil prices, and risk appetite indicators for additional clues. All three feed into how capital moves across pairs like USD/CHF — often indirectly — but with effects that are hard to ignore. How institutional flows manage strike volatility around these levels will also shape intraday momentum, particularly for shorter time-frame traders.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.