Iran insists on concrete guarantees before reaching any agreement with the US, as per a statement from the Iranian Foreign Ministry. This stance is communicated before an upcoming meeting in Istanbul with the E3 – Britain, France, and Germany – to prepare for potential US-Iran talks.

The primary goal of these discussions is for Iran to cease its nuclear activities, a key demand from the US. The oil market is closely monitoring the situation, anticipating a potential increase in Iranian oil supply if agreements are reached.

Crude Oil Inventory Report

In related news, a private survey shows a build in headline crude oil inventory contrary to the expected draw. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi addressed these issues in a conversation with Japanese media outlet NHK on Friday.

What’s been said so far, plainly put, is that Iran isn’t moving forward on any agreement with the US unless it’s backed by something firm, legally or otherwise. We know this comes just ahead of diplomatic sessions in Istanbul with Britain, France, and Germany—the so-called E3—which essentially serve as a planning table to map out what US-Iran negotiations might look like if they happen at all. From Iran’s view, verbal promises aren’t worth the paper they’re not written on; they’re after binding commitments.

The American demand remains what it has been: Iran must halt its nuclear enrichment far beyond commercial energy needs. This, if met, would presumably ease sanctions or at least open conversations around them. For the oil market, this creates a moving target. If diplomacy wins the day, and Iranian barrels return to global supply lines, that’s more oil on the table—potentially millions of barrels per day—putting downward pressure on prices.

Added to this is something more immediate. A private industry survey has shown that overall US crude oil inventories actually went up, whereas most traders were expecting a draw. These sorts of surprises tend to stir intraday pricing more than macro trends do. It’s not uncommon for traders using calendar spreads or options structures to reprice their position assumptions when inventory forecasts miss by this sort of margin. It does leave short-dated volatility screens looking enriched, at least over 1- to 2-week timeframes. Premiums appear to be getting backed into near-term contracts.

Araghchi, when speaking with NHK, wasn’t giving the usual soft diplomatic lines. He made it fairly plain, not only maintaining Iran’s expectations but tying them to broader international efforts. He also appeared to frame the US position as inconsistent over time, likely as a nod to prior deal commitments and their abandonment. It suggests that any resolution, if one is reached at all, won’t emerge overnight. That ambiguity alone can drag on sentiment for those holding structured derivatives tethered to Brent or WTI pricing benchmarks.

Market Reaction and Strategy

Right now, we can say with certainty that implied volatility in the front-month crude contracts has reacted more sharply to inventory changes than diplomacy headlines. That said, if the Istanbul meetings produce even a baseline framework, the politicking might start to overtake the barrels again. Possibility of increased supply, even months out, begins to get priced in through longer-dated future spreads—especially along the 6- to 12-month curve, where open interest has started shifting.

As a group, our own models are beginning to flag dislocations between historical risk premiums and current market structure, notably in the back-end of the curve. Steepening or flattening there can open opportunities for leveraged roll strategies or even arbitrage across regional grades. There’s also a noticeable shift in positioning within the options market, especially around $75 strike calls expiring next quarter. That sort of activity tends to reflect growing sentiment that either supply will weigh on prices or that macro pressures will subdue long-risk.

We’re watching intraday reaction to unexpected inventory builds much more closely now, particularly how they interact with volatility surfaces. It informs us where short-term traders see risk actually playing out, versus positioning just for geopolitical noise. The materials quoted earlier set a tone—it’s hard, it’s conditional, and it’s not moving fast. Those waiting on clarity should plan for delay, not resolution.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

GBP/USD experienced volatile trading as the market reacted to varied economic indicators. The pair rose above 1.3300 due to a weaker US dollar, with a muted response to US inflation data and focus on US trade deal developments.

UK labour statistics revealed a rise in unemployment to 4.5% and minor increase in claimant counts, contributing to market steadiness. April’s US Consumer Price Index showed a small decline, reaching a three-year low, raising questions about trade policies.

Uk Gdp Growth Figures

Upcoming UK GDP growth figures expect a 0.6% quarterly increase, alongside a year-over-year decline to 1.2%. The GBP/USD pair anticipates congestion amid fluctuating trading patterns and uncertain market sentiment prior to major economic data releases.

The Pound Sterling, the UK’s currency, ranks as the fourth most traded in the world, influenced by Bank of England decisions on monetary policy to maintain around a 2% inflation. Economic indicators like GDP and employment significantly affect its value, with a robust economy boosting the currency and a poor outlook causing depreciation.

A positive Trade Balance, reflecting more exports than imports, generally strengthens the GBP. Comprehensive research and an understanding of the associated risks are essential when trading currencies.

With the Pound briefly pushing beyond the 1.3300 level, much of the move can be attributed more to limited dollar strength than direct optimism around the UK economy. The US inflation data released recently failed to trigger any meaningful movement, partly because the figures aligned with expectations but also due to wider concerns surrounding ongoing trade policies. This filtered through to lower market engagement and a drift into technical ranges for the GBP/USD pair.

Uk Employment Data

By contrast, UK employment data painted a more mixed picture. There was a noticeable increase in the unemployment rate, nudging to 4.5%, paired with a modest rise in claimant counts. Despite these figures, the reaction across GBP pairs remained relatively subdued. This steadiness may have stemmed from market participants positioning tactfully before the next set of UK growth data.

We now have expectations forming around a 0.6% quarter-on-quarter rise in GDP, though annual growth is forecast to slow to 1.2%. These figures will likely be the next major catalyst for direction in sterling-related positioning. Within that, weaker consumer spending or underperformance in equities linked to vulnerable sectors could reinforce bearish sentiment among swing and options traders.

Many participants remain cautious, as the recent low CPI print from the US—coming in at a three-year nadir—raised speculation over whether central banks might pivot earlier than expected, particularly in an environment where growth concerns are intensifying. Whether this ultimately weakens the dollar further over the medium term remains open, but for now, GBP/USD looks prone to whipsawing as traders assess incoming data.

Given that the Pound tends to react quicker to changes in expectations around Bank of England policy than to one-off reports, consistent employment weakness or a lower-than-forecast GDP read would mount pressure on forward interest rate projections. That in turn could lead sterling lower unless counterbalanced by fresh signs of dollar fatigue.

Another area factoring into recent positioning has been shifts in trade balances. In the UK’s case, an improvement here is often viewed favourably by currency models. However, a stronger GBP can offset some of those benefits, especially for export-heavy sectors. The overall trade setup has become more nuanced, particularly as global supply chains recalibrate and bilateral trade flows face renewed scrutiny.

While algorithm-based strategies continue to drive short-term fluctuations, discretion remains key. Price is increasingly sensitive to even marginal shifts in economic sentiment, and we have seen this play out via rapid re-adjustments within intraday trading sessions. In such environments, deploying gamma strategies or maintaining delta-neutral positions with tighter stops may help hedge against abrupt moves.

Looking ahead, data-dependent moves will persist—especially as quarterly earnings and central bank minutes start to trickle in. Directional trades are becoming harder to hold for longer durations, and as such, skewed straddle strategies or short-dated calendar spreads may be preferable for exposure. Risk remains two-sided, and there’s little to suggest clean momentum will take hold before a clearer earnings versus macro framework emerges.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average dipped by around 270 points, stalling near 42,130 after a strong Monday rally of over a thousand points. This pullback followed a notable rise in tech stocks which drove other equity indexes higher, leaving the Dow behind.

April’s US Consumer Price Index (CPI) saw inflation easing, with a monthly increase of 0.2% against a 0.3% expectation. Annualised CPI rose 2.3% year-on-year, below the anticipated 2.4%, marking the slowest growth in three years. Tariff effects may reverse progress from May onward, despite decreases in gasoline, apparel, used cars, and airplane ticket prices.

rising prices and wage growth

Eggs, coffee, ground beef, and other goods saw around 10% YoY price hikes, with wages rising by roughly 4%. Upcoming data includes Thursday’s US Producer Price Index and US Retail Sales figures, and the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index on Friday.

The Dow Jones halted at approximately 42,300 after reclaiming over 15.5% from early April’s fall. A fresh move beyond the 200-day Exponential Moving Average near 41,500 encouraged upward momentum, hinting at potential record highs above 45,000.

Building on the softer-than-expected CPI print, relief in headline inflation sparked optimism early in the week, particularly among the rate-sensitive technology names which had already priced in a path of more stable borrowing costs. While other indices gained ground on this tailwind, the Dow’s more cyclical makeup made it more reactive to upcoming data points, which are likely to have a stronger sway on expectations surrounding consumer and wholesale price stability.

The current CPI reading—both monthly and year-on-year—matches with a gentle but sustained deceleration in price pressures. While downward moves in volatile categories such as fuel and airline fares have helped, the stickier components—particularly food items like eggs and beef—remain elevated. The yearly gain in wages, sitting at 4%, continues to outpace general inflation. This sort of disconnect keeps consumption strong while also complicating the disinflationary trend. What’s important here is not only the gap but the possible knock-on effect into services inflation, an element less affected by energy or goods cycles.

expectations from upcoming data

The PPI report expected on Thursday, followed closely by retail sales figures, will carry heavier weight this time. The former will either support or undermine the idea that input costs for businesses are falling, while the latter gives us a better sense of how resilient household demand remains after multiple rounds of tightening. Friday’s consumer sentiment reading might appear disjointed in this context, but it’s where inflation expectations embedded in public perception often give us more clarity than raw data. If average households begin to believe price pressures are going to rise again—especially alongside geopolitical or policy shifts—it becomes a self-feeding loop.

Markets, and by extension, we, tend to jump quickly to pricing in future rate decisions based on incremental releases. What gets missed in that urgency is the potential for lag effects, particularly where tariffs and external shocks delay or disrupt disinflation. When Liu announced fresh duties last week, few factored in the timing mismatch—tariffs may only visibly impact prices from May onward. That delay clouds any short-term inference from April data. We would do better to step back and question how sticky these effects will become as inventories adjust and trade patterns shift.

From a technical perspective, the Dow’s bounce through the 200-day exponential moving average gave a medium-term bullish signal. Yet stalling just below the recovery high creates a slightly ambiguous zone—we see potential for a drift higher toward 45,000, but only if hard data in the coming sessions doesn’t undo the supportive CPI reaction. We’ve noticed this before: whenever broader indices attempt to rally independently of earnings or macro confirmation, volatility tends to re-emerge with disappointing reports. For anyone trading near-term positions, especially in contracts expiring over the next two weeks, it’s worth reconsidering exposure heading into Thursday.

Positioning in options markets has flattened somewhat compared to early April, marking a small retreat in hedging activity. If PPI comes in hotter than expected, there’s room for premiums on puts to rise quickly, particularly in shorter-dated contracts. Given the uncertainty over new tariffs, directional bets below the 41,500 level may offer asymmetric reward if sentiment sours. Similarly, if retail sales continue to beat expectations, skew could flip abruptly back toward the upside. We’ve noticed that defensive names within the index are not drawing the same safe-haven flows as during late March, which hints at pockets of overconfidence in pricing directionality.

As it stands, each data point this week carries more than its surface meaning. Not for what it tells us about the past month, but whether it confirms or contests the idea that inflation is genuinely cooling beneath the surface—even as headline figures suggest as much. One weaker number may not build a trend, but it does open brief windows of opportunity. As we’ve seen with the earlier rally, when these gaps appear—before they’ve baked fully into consensus forecasts—volatility can increase rapidly in both directions. It’s a matter of being nimble, not bold.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

A private survey by the American Petroleum Institute (API) indicated a crude oil inventory increase, contrary to expectations of a 1.1 million barrel decline. The API survey, focused on oil storage facilities and companies, also expected distillates to increase by 0.1 million barrels and gasoline to decrease by 0.6 million barrels.

The official data from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA) is awaited for a complete picture. The EIA report, based on data from the Department of Energy, is considered more precise and offers additional insights into refinery operations and storage levels for various crude oil grades.

Api Inventory Update

This update from the American Petroleum Institute (API) reflects a rise in crude inventories, a move that goes against what the market had broadly forecast. Instead of drawing down around 1.1 million barrels, the API reported an unexpected build, which hints at softer-than-anticipated refinery demand or perhaps a slower pace in export activity during the surveyed period. We note that gasoline stocks were drawn down modestly, while distillates showed only a minor rise. That points to seasonal consumption shifts and possible changes in transportation fuel use—especially relevant as travel demand patterns tend to fluctuate around this time.

Given the timing of these numbers, many are now looking to the upcoming figures from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA). Unlike the API, the EIA collects its data directly from operators, providing a more comprehensive look not only at commercial storage levels, but also at refinery throughput, inputs by crude quality, and regional breakdowns. That level of granularity often influences pricing direction more sharply.

From a positioning standpoint, the misalignment between the API estimate and market expectations offers us a short-term signal. Inventory builds in this context often suggest weaker consumption or stronger domestic production. Either would weigh on prompt-month contracts and nudge the forward curve flatter. If the EIA confirms the build, the front end of the curve could soften further. In contrast, a drawdown from the EIA would likely trigger covering and rebalancing, particularly in the prompt futures.

Market Implications

Across calendar spreads, there’s a chance some short-term weakness will emerge if storage remains readily available and refineries are slower to pull. This is something we will be tracking closely. It’s also worth noting that refinery maintenance, though winding down in some regions, may still play a role in varying demand for feedstocks. That could skew the EIA numbers in ways a simple build headline doesn’t fully explain.

We therefore remain sensitive to how traders adjust in response to clarity from federal figures. Open interest trends appear stable but may shift quickly based on this week’s confirmation. Structurally, funds with a model-driven approach might need to reassess long bias if broader inventory dynamics continue in this direction.

In the short term, we continue to watch diesel margins, shipping activity along the Gulf Coast, and refinery throughput rates. Small surprises in each could move volatility higher. Energy options markets have been quiet, though risk is starting to reprice slightly at the front end. Traders holding structures close to expiry may need to consider rolling or hedging more actively depending on which way the official data goes.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The US Dollar weakened as the Dollar Index fell to 101.50 after April’s CPI data failed to meet expectations. The Australian Dollar saw a 1.5% rise against the US Dollar, buoyed by easing US-China trade tensions and a favourable market outlook. The Federal Reserve is expected to maintain its rate policy until mid-2025, with possible rate cuts in September 2025.

The weaker inflation data in the US, with a 2.3% year-on-year rise against a forecast of 2.4%, added downward pressure on the US Dollar. Meanwhile, trade negotiations between the US and China led to a 90-day tariff suspension, lowering tariffs to 30% on US goods and 10% on Chinese imports. Market sentiment improved, supporting currencies like the Australian Dollar.

Technical Indicators And Influences

Technical indicators for the AUD/USD pair show a bullish trend, trading near 0.6500, with key resistance seen at this level. The Relative Strength Index signifies neutral momentum while the MACD indicates a potential sell signal. The Australian Dollar’s trajectory is influenced by factors such as RBA’s interest rates and Australia’s trade balance, especially with China being its largest trading partner.

The recent downward movement in the Dollar Index to 101.50, prompted by softer-than-expected inflation figures from the US, reveals shifting expectations around Federal Reserve policy. A 2.3% year-on-year increase in consumer prices—slightly below the projected 2.4%—has invited fresh speculation that US rates will hold steady for longer than previously anticipated, possibly pushing the timeline for any cuts well into the second half of next year. That delay adds weight to the notion that current US monetary settings might already be restrictive enough to rein in price growth.

For us observing derivative exposures, particularly in macro rates and FX options, this development creates short-term directionality where tail hedges on USD strength may lose value if inflation continues to undershoot. Those positioned towards USD downside, whether spot or via options skew, will likely maintain momentum—especially under current flows.

Market Impacts And Positioning

More notable, however, is the market lift handed to the Australian Dollar, which has surged around 1.5% against the greenback. That strength found support both from the broader risk-on sentiment spurred by trade progress between Washington and Beijing, and the narrowing gap between US and Australian monetary policy. A temporary tariff rollback—30% on US goods, 10% on Chinese imports—has introduced a slightly more cooperative tone, nudging equities and risk-sensitive currencies higher.

Market participants focusing on the AUD/USD pair have found support near the 0.6500 level. While this resistance presents a technical hurdle, any firm breach may target higher retracements, especially if macro tailwinds remain. Current indicators point in different directions: the MACD tilts towards a slower momentum shift with a sell hint, while the RSI remains balanced. The price isn’t overbought nor deeply oversold, suggesting the current levels are still being digested.

What matters now is how we interpret this crossing point between technical signals and macro influences. Reserve Bank of Australia policy expectations are unlikely to change quickly, but monthly adjustments in trade data—especially Chinese demand for Australian commodities—could register swiftly into FX. For those engaged in yield-based carry strategies or volatility selling, ongoing calm in trade headlines could reduce implied vol levels across the board.

With that in mind, short-term positioning in volatility markets may lean towards tempered risk appetite. However, directional plays—particularly those targeting AUD continuation—could harshly unwind if global data deviates from current projections or if import-export acceleration from China falters.

Given how the pricing of front-end US interest rate cuts has become stickier post-CPI, we may expect yield compression across AUD/USD derivatives to incrementally favour the Australian side, assuming macro conditions don’t deteriorate. The market’s openness to rate relief further down the curve still preserves convexity pricing in long-dated options, and those watching skew movements haven’t yet signalled a reversal.

We should remain attentive to any abrupt pivots in tone from the Federal Reserve or signs of recovery in US data that could reintroduce a hawkish bias. Such shifts often trigger sharp re-pricings in the front-end, particularly in futures spreads, which would ripple into spot sensitivities.

For now, capital flows appear to chase opportunities in a broader Asia-Pacific context, and with risk sentiment slightly more stable, positioning bias may continue to favour higher beta FX—just not without near-term resistance.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The major US indices saw gains, with the NASDAQ index rising by 1.61%. This was influenced by expected CPI data showing a 0.2% increase, below the 0.3% expectation.

The S&P index has moved to a positive 0.08% on the year. The NASDAQ index now trails its 2024 closing level by 1.56%, while the Dow industrial average is down by 0.95%.

Impact Of Unitedhealth On The Dow

On the trading day, the Dow industrial average dropped 269.67 points, or 0.64%, to 42140.43. UnitedHealth’s sharp decrease of 17.83% impacted the Dow after the CEO’s resignation and absence of future guidance.

In contrast, the S&P index climbed 45.36 points, or 0.72%, ending at 5886.55. The NASDAQ rose 301.74 points, or 1.61%, finishing at 19010.08, while the Russell 2000 increased by 10.15 points, or 0.49%, reaching 2102.34.

Notable gainers included First Solar at 22.63%, Super Micro Computer at 15.99%, and Robinhood Markets at 8.93%. Other companies such as Palantir and Rocket each experienced an 8.10% increase, with ETH/USD rising by 7.44%.

We’ve just witnessed an upward move in US equities, most of it driven by softer consumer price inflation data. The monthly rise of 0.2% came in below expectations and hinted at a possible easing of pressure on monetary policy. This translated quickly into positive sentiment across several indices. But while two of the major benchmarks ended the day higher, not all sectors moved in the same direction.

Sector And Market Dynamics

What we’re looking at is more than just a daily volatility swing. Gains in tech-heavy names helped push the NASDAQ upwards by over 300 points, which signals that investor enthusiasm may still be skewed toward growth stocks—particularly those with perceived ties to artificial intelligence and clean energy. These pockets of strength underscore a broader theme: risk appetite has not disappeared. But it’s worth noting where certain weak points remain.

The modest year-to-date gain in the S&P suggests that larger, more diversified names may be struggling to find momentum. Financials and healthcare, for example, remain under pressure. Meanwhile, the drop in the Dow was largely due to a sharp tumble in a single heavyweight name. When one constituent makes up a disproportionate amount of the index’s weight and loses nearly 18%, that’s enough to drag down the average—even if other names are flat or rising. So it wasn’t broad weakness, but rather a concentrated one.

Looking at the Russell 2000, a small-cap index, the move higher aligns with a modest reflationary tone, possibly sparked by easing bond yields or revised expectations around future rate hikes. We need to continue watching how these smaller companies react, since they are more sensitive to changes in the lending environment.

Winners such as Super Micro and First Solar reflect a preference for innovation-led themes—both are seen as plays on forward-looking investment trends. When these stocks jump this sharply, it suggests traders are pricing in stronger demand, improved margins, or both. It also highlights where market momentum is currently pooling: we’re seeing quick moves into names that represent shifts in broader industry thinking, such as energy storage or decentralised computing.

Meanwhile, digital assets stepped back into focus, with ETH/USD registering a gain of more than 7%. That’s more than just a coincidence; it’s tethered not only to flows but also to the sense that some corners of the market are starting to discount tighter monetary conditions in the near term. This ties neatly into current leveraged swap flows we’re observing, which are not yet extreme, but are tilting toward the long side in correlation with growth proxies.

For traders of volatility and derivatives, it’s essential to reassess positioning relative to sector performance rather than relying solely on index-level movement. With divergences this wide, implied vol in some single names or specific baskets may offer better opportunities than broader measures like the VIX or SKEW.

This is where we need to return to basics. How do individual components behave against macro inputs like CPI surprises, rate expectations, or geopolitical noise? And more importantly, where is mispricing most visible? Compression in vol surfaces for growth-heavy sectors provides opportunity—especially when paired with catalysts either already confirmed or expected soon.

Let’s keep attention on earnings readouts coming from these high-beta sectors. Risks now seem more idiosyncratic than systemic, marked by abrupt responses to changes in guidance or leadership. These gaps widen during tight monetary conditions, with option premiums often misaligned with realised movement. There’s yield to be found—but only by selectively choosing what to sell and where to take on directional exposure.

In short, the better-than-forecast CPI data has opened a brief window for momentum to reassert itself. But the window narrows quickly if macro data runs hot again. In that scenario, safe-haven rotation may sharpen, turning lower beta names and staple-heavy ETFs into outsized beneficiaries.

These are moments to lean into relative value rather than outright directional bets. Let’s stay focused on dispersion and hedge where skew becomes too aggressive.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The US Dollar Index (DXY) dropped to 101.50 after US CPI inflation for April cooled to 2.3% annually, contrary to expected forecasts. Core inflation remained steady at 2.8%, fostering speculation of a potential Federal Reserve rate cut by September 2025, with easing anticipated through 2026.

Uncertainties have emerged from vague trade commitments with China and the UK, accompanied by ambitious tax and investment plans from President Trump that lack economic impact details. Despite a tariff reduction headline, effective rates on Chinese goods exceed 40%, leading to scepticism about the recent trade deal’s permanence.

Bearish Tendencies and Support and Resistance Levels

The US Dollar Index showed bearish tendencies, trading around 101.00, with the Relative Strength Index and Ultimate Oscillator in neutral territory. Momentum indicators suggest short-term selling pressure, with collective moving averages indicating a broader bearish trend. Support levels are found at 100.94, 100.73, and 100.63, while resistance is identified at 101.42, 101.94, and 101.98.

The economic tensions between the US and China, referred to as a trade war, stemmed from extreme protectionism and tariffs initiated by President Trump in 2018. Recently reignited by Trump’s return to office in 2025, this ongoing conflict places pressure on global supply chains and impacts spending, indirectly affecting CPI inflation.

With headline inflation falling below expectations to 2.3%, while core remains anchored at 2.8%, markets have interpreted this disinflation as a step closer to eventual easing by the Federal Reserve. Although the central bank continues to signal patience, pricing now leans more decisively towards a cut after the summer of 2025. That timing reveals something specific—investors now see fewer barriers to reintroducing risk into rate-sensitive assets.

Traders in interest rate and FX derivatives have reacted promptly. Option skews in the short end of the U.S. rates curve suggest an increased appetite for downside protection, showing that there’s hedging in place for another drop in the dollar. We’ve also seen volatility premiums rise mildly in the two-year Treasury swaption space, pointing to a shift in sentiment towards more aggressive rate repricing. These reactions aren’t without basis. With momentum metrics signalling overextension in recent dollar rallies, there appears little technical appetite for a broader reversal upward.

Trade Announcements and Their Impact

Powell’s remarks, though restrained in tone, haven’t countered these expectations either. The market no longer trusts rhetoric alone but appears to be weighting hard numbers more heavily now—especially as unemployment starts showing cracks and PCE tracks south quietly.

In parallel, the optimism around trade announcements has quickly worn off. Lighthizer’s latest commentary did little to clarify tariff mechanics or timelines, despite headline proclamations. The effective duty rate on imported Chinese steel, for example, remains above pre-2020 levels, making it hard to view any tariff talk as policy softening. These mixed signals inject unwelcome uncertainty into hedging strategies, particularly in USD/CNH and GBP/USD options, where implied vols have begun ticking upward. Resistance in DXY at 101.94 absorbs any shallow rebounds, making patience key when selecting re-entry points.

The retracement in DXY to 101.00 now carries weight, with some algo-driven strategies triggering down to strong support near 100.63. These mechanical sell layers tend to exaggerate moves once momentum rolls, which remains a risk here. More so as liquidity is thinner than usual, given summer desks are under-resourced and exposure trims are already underway across macro books.

Delving deeper into the technicals, convergence of the longer-term exponential moving averages points to prolonged downside pressure. RSI and Ultimate Oscillator may look neutral, but price action below the 200-day moving average keeps sentiment constrained. Unless we see a meaningful deviation in incoming data—most likely through jobless claims or the next core PCE print—we shouldn’t expect this dollar softness to reverse in the near term. That tempers any strategy relying on short-term dollar recovery.

Among the contributing forces, Beijing remains opaque in its policy response. Hints of potential retaliatory measures against fresh U.S. tariffs circulate, yet confirmation is absent. This leaves energy prices and industrial inputs exposed, which indirectly re-surfaces in inflation-linked asset classes. We’ve noticed breakevens on five-year TIPS move erratically, particularly as hedge funds shift out of bullish reflation trades in commodities. Such moves usually bring sharp reactions in dollar-based derivatives—especially those tied to real rates.

Watching the 100.73 level on DXY becomes essential; a breach there could spark another round of defensive repositioning in both leveraged FX and macro fixed income strategies. We’ve already encountered early unwinds in structured carry trades dependent on USD strength, particularly those against higher-yielding EM currencies. That suggests growing unease about dollar demand holding up into Q3.

Trump’s policy stance, albeit declared with confidence, remains fuzzy on execution. Tax and infrastructure ambitions provide headlines, but bond traders continue to demand wider term premia, reflecting doubts over fiscal discipline. The knock-on effect on longer-tenor yields has been subtle but persistent. This steepening bias affects swap spreads, indirectly pressuring forward guidance expectations via OIS curves.

Through it all, shorter maturity dollar swaps and eurodollar futures display increased sensitivity to minor shifts in inflation data and forward guidance commentary. And for now, implied volatility surfaces in FX skew firmly to the downside.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US April core CPI matched expectations at +2.8% year-over-year, resulting in a decline for the US dollar. The market saw a modest initial reaction, but the decline in the dollar became more pronounced as the day progressed. Global developments included the US reducing tariffs on China, a move confirmed by Chinese authorities, and further economic sanctions imposed by the US on Iran.

In other news, Trump urged the Federal Reserve to cut rates, while the New York Fed reported a significant increase in student loan delinquencies in the first quarter. The European Central Bank’s (ECB) Knot noted uncertainty’s negative impact on inflation and growth. Goldman Sachs now speculates the ECB’s terminal rate could reach 1.75% by July.

Commodity Markets Strength

Commodity markets showed strength with WTI crude oil rising to $63.68 and gold climbing by $15 to $3248. Stock markets also saw gains, with a 0.8% increase in the S&P 500, while US 10-year yields rose to 4.48%. In foreign exchange, the Australian dollar led gains, while the US dollar lagged, influenced by evolving Fed rate cut expectations and changes in investor sentiment.

The published consumer price index data for April, specifically the core measure which excludes food and energy, came in right on forecast at a 2.8% annual pace. No surprises there, and under typical conditions, such figures wouldn’t rattle markets this much. But the downward shift in the US dollar highlighted how expectations had quietly crept higher among traders in recent weeks. So when the figures failed to beat, the dollar softened — and not just briefly. As hours passed, markets leaned into the idea that the Federal Reserve may, in fact, resume thinking about rate cuts sooner than they’d previously let on.

In the background, Washington’s decision to scale back tariffs on Chinese imports was met with confirmation from Beijing – a rare moment of bilateral calm. The timing of the announcement matters. It came amid an otherwise complicated mix of pressure on Iran, as the White House rolled out fresh rounds of sanctions, largely focused on financial transactions tied to the petroleum sector. These measures shift capital flows and tend to raise the geopolitical risk premium in oil and gold – especially on volatile trading desks.

Former president Trump has once again taken to the media to critique the Federal Reserve, pushing for lower rates. Regardless of political motivations, this public pressure introduces yet another variable for markets to digest. Meanwhile, over in Manhattan, data from the New York Fed is pointing to rising stress in the financial system – notably with sharp growth in student loan delinquencies. These delinquencies undermine assumptions about household balance sheets, which had been recovering steadily since the pandemic. This is data with potential long-term implications, particularly for bond and credit markets.

European Central Bank and Commodities

Back in Europe, Knot of the ECB weighed in, making it clear that persistent uncertainty is holding back both inflation and broader economic activity. We’ve seen forecasts from Goldman Sachs reflect this concern, with their projections now putting the ECB’s highest policy rate at 1.75% by midsummer. That’s a clear shift from earlier projections and deserves close attention as it intersects with income strategies in the euro market.

On the commodity front, oil and gold moved upward, reflecting both the regional tension and a broader appetite for tangible assets in uncertain times. With WTI crude pressing beyond $63 and gold jumping another $15 to $3,248, the energy and metals space is acting as a barometer for financial anxiety. Broadly speaking, we tend to see these moves when traders look for safer ground, though some bids are clearly pure momentum.

Equities followed suit with a measured push higher – the S&P tracking up almost a full percent. Risk was being embraced, and that’s important, especially as US 10-year Treasury yields crept up to 4.48%. Higher yields typically weigh on equity pricing, but this week’s market tone suggests a broader reassessment of macro conditions, particularly around disinflation trends and future rate paths.

In FX, dynamics were more telling than in previous sessions. The Australian dollar was the day’s outperformer while the greenback trailed behind. This rotation is a product of clear shifts in interest rate differentials. With the Fed’s next moves now in question, and inflation showing less persistence than feared, traders are recalibrating carry strategies – rotating away from the dollar in favour of currencies supported by relatively upbeat domestic data or better policy clarity.

For those positioned in derivative markets, few signals came without context. Pricing discrepancies need to be watched closely in coming sessions. What appears stable may not remain so, especially as implied volatility metrics begin to diverge across asset classes. Reaction times could shorten. It’s essential now to concentrate not just on the obvious indicators, but those smaller signals driving reopening themes, balance sheet shifts, or pricing anomalies in the rates curve. The window for low-delta rebalancing seems narrow – something to take seriously as the calendar moves towards quarter-end.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Canadian Dollar (CAD) gained slightly on Tuesday, primarily due to a decrease in US Dollar (USD) demand across the market. With low-tier data available, the Canadian Dollar’s movement this week depends heavily on market sentiment.

The end of US “reciprocal tariffs” is approaching, with no clear trade deal details in sight, which creates uncertainty for Canadian exports. USD/CAD dropped below the 1.3950 level, influenced by easing US Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation, although future data might reflect tariff effects.

Key Indicators

US Producer Price Index (PPI) and Consumer Sentiment data are expected later in the week. The Canadian Dollar reversed a losing streak, pushing USD/CAD down further, but high headline risks for traders remain due to uncertain trends.

Key drivers for the Canadian Dollar include Bank of Canada interest rates, Oil prices, economic health, inflation, and trade balance. Higher interest rates and Oil prices generally strengthen CAD, while weaker economic data can lead to CAD depreciation. The US economy also plays a vital role due to the trading relationship between the US and Canada.

The Bank of Canada influences CAD through interest rate adjustments, affecting inflation and economic stability. Oil prices directly impact CAD value, with higher prices bolstering it, while lower prices cause depreciation. Macroeconomic data releases, such as GDP and employment figures, provide insights into the economy and can sway CAD direction.

As we’ve seen, the Canadian Dollar (CAD) has managed to scrape back some ground following weeks of declines, driven more by the retreat of the US Dollar (USD) than by any fresh domestic catalyst. This isn’t unusual. In times when domestic economic indicators are thin, shifts in CAD often reflect broader global flows, particularly changes in risk appetite and sentiment around the US economy. The current move down in USD/CAD, which took the pair below the 1.3950 mark, wasn’t so much due to new Canadian strength, but more in reaction to softening US Consumer Price Index figures. Lower inflation expectations from the US can shift interest rate forecasts, which in turn weaken the greenback, and that’s what we’re watching unfold.

However, there’s a lurking element that could create fresh disturbances soon—reciprocal tariffs between the US and Canada are expiring imminently, but we’ve not yet seen a comprehensive outline of any replacement terms or trade agreements. This lack of information leaves traders exposed to surprising tariff-related headlines, making it harder to price risk effectively. Export-heavy sectors in Canada could be particularly vulnerable, which might then feed into GDP and manufacturing data, weakening CAD if trade slows.

Later this week, we’re anticipating fresh data prints from the US in the form of the Producer Price Index along with revised consumer sentiment readings. These will matter more than usual. If producer-side inflation comes in hotter, it could reignite policy tightening discussions from the US Fed, pushing the USD sharply higher again. On the other hand, any soft data would likely reinforce the view that rates have peaked, and may stay steady or even start to ease in the months ahead. Either of those outcomes has short-term implications for currency pairs like USD/CAD, making it a potentially reactive period in trading.

Looking Ahead

Policymakers in Ottawa remain a back-pocket concern: the Bank of Canada continues to hold the credibility of forward guidance, and even subtle shifts in their tone can nudge the market. At the same time, global oil prices have stabilised somewhat, but we remain alert—a sudden rally in crude, fuelled by production cuts or geopolitical disruptions, could send CAD higher. Remember, the currency maintains a strong correlation to oil given its large export component.

We’re watching the macro data as well: employment numbers, retail spending, and growth updates all have the capacity to make or break the short-term trends. It’s also worth acknowledging that Canadian fundamentals must be measured not in isolation, but against expectations. A mediocre job print might still be CAD-positive if it beats forecasts in a pessimistic backdrop.

The trading relationship between Canada and the US underpins a large chunk of CAD’s pricing. If US growth slows and Fed rate expectations drift lower, that could give CAD a relative edge, particularly if domestic conditions in Canada hold steady. This cross-border dynamic reinforces the importance of assimilating both nations’ economic paths when modelling price expectations.

Volatility could increase from here—headline risk is layered with fundamental pressure. Price levels like 1.3850 and 1.4000 could see repeated tests. We’re positioning for potential whipsaws, until more certainty emerges through data or policy developments.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

China has expressed disapproval of a trade agreement between the UK and the US. The country worries that the deal might limit Chinese products in British supply chains.

Beijing articulated that agreements between nations should not aim to exclude other countries. They emphasised adherence to this “basic principle” in international dealings.

International Trade Dynamics

This diplomatic reaction from Beijing points to a growing awareness of how international trade agreements ripple beyond the immediate signatories. The concern, in this case, centres on whether the pact could subtly reshape access to markets and influence sourcing decisions—particularly for nations not directly involved. By singling out the concept of exclusion, the Chinese government is making a broader commentary on emerging trade alliances and how they might be used to create spheres of preferential economic influence.

What’s important in the context of this development is how it reframes the way cross-border supply frameworks are being structured. Not as purely commercial dynamics, but increasingly with strategic considerations folded into them. With supply chains often serving as indirect mechanisms for asserting economic influence, any shift in their composition—whether caused by tariffs, trade rules, or geopolitical recalibration—becomes immediately relevant.

For us, this puts further weight behind paying attention not only to tariffs or headline trade volumes, but to the subtler terms embedded in deals: clauses about origin, joint ventures, technology definitions, regulatory harmonisation. Individually, these may appear benign; collectively, they can signal shifts that alter flow direction and transaction preference.

Potential Market Repercussions

Savvy positioning over the next several weeks may lie in closer observation of commodity-linked agreements tied to Anglo-American trade flows. These could begin to show early reordering in volume expectations or component sourcing. Markets may begin to price in potential preference away from certain suppliers, especially if procurement policies become politicised.

Moreover, Liu’s pointed remarks about inclusion serve more as a warning of broader fatigue with selective commercial bloc-building—and may form the basis for gradual recalibration in export strategy, subsidies targeting Western markets, or even countermeasures in parallel agreements elsewhere.

In our view, this creates a valuable short-term window to monitor potential changes in FX hedging behaviour from East Asia, and reoptimise exposure to sensitive inputs—particularly in sectors where supply elasticity is low, and demand is project-based.

The tone of the message sent from the Chinese capital also suggests that further commentary will likely follow. Regular communication from trade officials can set expectations for market participants, especially those dealing in shipping, industrial manufacturing, and raw material contracts. In those cases, brief anticipatory shifts in volatility may offer targeted opportunities, if leveraged with care.

As hedging postures tighten globally, paying keener attention to diplomatic signalling like this may improve insight into where sourcing pressure might arise next—and by extension, where medium-term spread adjustments could begin forming at the contract level.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.