The US Dollar (USD) has declined for the second day, following unexpected US inflation data. The Korean Won has gained against the Dollar after discussions between the United States and South Korea about Forex markets. The US Dollar Index (DXY), which tracks the USD against six major currencies, is nearing the 100-level, recorded at around 100.60.

The decrease is due to softer US inflation and discussions between the US and South Korea on currency matters. The CPI reading for April has increased expectations for a potential Federal Reserve rate cut, subsequently narrowing the rate difference between the US and other nations. The July decision predicts a 38.6% chance for lower rates.

Currency Adjustments and Market Impact

Talks of currency adjustments may impact the Greenback’s value. South Korea and the US are engaging in discussions which could influence market anticipations. Technically, the DXY faces resistance at 101.90 and support at 100.22, with the potential of revisiting 94.56 if downward momentum continues.

The March 2023 Banking Crisis, involving US banks with substantial tech and crypto exposure, weakened the US Dollar by altering interest rate forecasts. This situation affected banking liquidity, with Gold prices rising as a safe haven amid reduced US rate expectations.

What’s already happened here is quite straightforward. Recent inflation data in the US came in weaker than expected, pushing the Federal Reserve’s hand closer to considering rate cuts. This is important because when rate expectations fall, so does the attractiveness of a currency—this time, it’s the Dollar feeling the pinch.

Weakened inflation print and renewed talks between the US and South Korea on currency matters have triggered two related developments. First, the US Dollar Index (DXY) is brushing dangerously close to the 100.00 level. That level has been used by many as a psychological marker. At the same time, the Korean Won is strengthening, suggesting that markets are taking both the inflation narrative and these bilateral discussions between Seoul and Washington quite seriously.

For rate-sensitive strategies, this sets the tone. With a lower dollar and firmer Asian currencies, any derivatives position tied to interest rate differentials across borders might need to be reviewed. The reduced spread between US rates and those elsewhere means that carry trades using the USD as the base may no longer provide the buffer previously assumed.

Technically, areas of interest have emerged. Resistance is firming around 101.90 on the DXY—if that holds, a downward drift becomes more plausible. Support at 100.22 is the immediate level to monitor. But if that breaks, a move toward 94.56 might not be out of the question, which would be a larger shift by any recent standard.

Rate Cut Probabilities and Market Implications

Rate cut probabilities for July, currently sitting near 39%, are not yet dominant but are rising steadily. Should any additional softness show in employment or inflation prints before the decision date, those odds could climb quickly. That would put more downward pressure on yield-sensitive trades. Traders using leveraged positions, especially in interest-rate futures or options tied to Fed direction, might consider rebalancing towards a softer monetary stance, at least in the short term.

Let’s not forget the echoes from March last year. The banking turbulence back then—mostly contained in regional US lenders with outsized bets on digital assets and tech—shook confidence in the entire rate cycle. What followed then was a retreat in forward rate pricing and a simultaneous rally in safe-haven instruments. We’ve already started to see similar mechanics play out again, albeit on a lower scale. The resurgence in Gold levels against falling real yields mirrors that previous move, so correlations there merit watching.

This backdrop offers a constructive input for implied volatility models, as declining rates and growing policy divergence are likely to keep volatility skewed towards the upside for non-US pairs. So far, we’ve seen this pressure building subtly, especially in Asian FX options, where short-dated puts on the Dollar are being priced with tighter spreads. That says a lot about short-term sentiment among institutional desks.

Going forward, we’ll need to monitor additional Fed commentary and any further diplomatic remarks on FX from Treasury officials or their counterparts abroad. If verbal guidance becomes more assertive, markets may pre-empt action, as they often do. From our side, reading beyond headlines and focusing on rate curves and forward guidance has proved to provide a clearer view than relying solely on scheduled economic prints.

In the meantime, levels on the DXY below 100 might open doors for shorter-term momentum selling. But anything around 94.50 would likely bring in stabilisation flows, especially if macro numbers from Europe or Asia fail to outperform. That’s where positioning should be nimble. And, of course, managing Greek exposures—Vega and Gamma in particular—will be essential as implied vols evolve.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Gold prices have fallen by $60 to $3187 after breaking the May 1 low and breaching the May bottom of $3202. The effort to establish a double bottom at $3200 failed due to easing tensions in the trade war and a ceasefire between India and Pakistan.

Support might be found at the early-April high of $3167, with additional support at $3150. If these levels do not hold, prices could move towards $3100 and further down to the significant $3000 level, indicating a possible return to the post-Liberation ‘sell everything’ low levels.

Market Dynamics

What we’ve seen so far suggests that the early attempt to carve out a foundation near $3200 has not held up under pressure. The sharp drop in price, accelerated by dissipating geopolitical friction and a temporary quietening on the Sino-Indian military front, left no room for bullish stability to take root. That double-bottom attempt was washed away once tensions eased and nervous sentiment began to lift. We’re currently observing a decline in the value of gold not driven by waning fundamentals, but rather by a series of quick sentiment reversals tied to external catalysts—none of which offered enduring support.

Now, attention turns to the next potential fail-safes. The early-April high at $3167 is being tested, albeit without much enthusiasm from buyers. Market participants seem hesitant, likely rattled by the speed and strength of the fall. The line around $3150 is even thinner—almost brittle in its ability to cushion continued downside. Should price falter here too, we may be staring at another return to levels that haven’t been revisited in any meaningful way since the post-Liberation slump.

What’s particularly telling is the consistency in how bears have been pressing their case. Selling pressure hasn’t been sporadic or reactionary—it’s been methodical. That tells us something. It’s not only the shift in newsflow; it’s the absence of counteraction. No discernible defensive positioning has shown up in the options market either. Skew remains tilted heavily to the puts, and implied volatility on near-term contracts has only just begun to pick up again after a lull, implying that participants are bracing for deeper moves downward, rather than bounce.

From our position, we see a market where actual buyers are notably thin. There may be some stop-and-start interest trying to hold price somewhere between $3160 and $3150, but the dominant activity comes from systematic sellers removing positions that no longer serve them. Whenever we begin to close in towards $3100, the hesitation observed earlier is likely to fade. That level carries historical gravity—it’s been a price area where pain was concentrated and amplified in past years, especially during sharp deleveraging periods.

Psychological Levels

And there’s also the lurking weight of $3000. Not merely a round number, but one that’s carried psychological baggage in previous sell-offs. If we start flirting too close to that region, the technical picture shifts considerably. Earlier retracement zones lose their relevance; the former supports morph into resistance. For those active in futures or structured options, that would suggest a recalibration of both time horizon and strike selection is warranted now—no room for ambiguous hedging anymore, and aggressive profit-taking on short-term calls may begin to set the tone if momentum doesn’t abate soon.

It is also worth mentioning the kind of flows we’ve started to track in the leveraged exchange space. These have been net outflows consistently now for seven sessions. That’s rare. And when paired with flat to soft physical demand indicators from the Asia-Pacific region, it creates the picture of a vacuum beneath the current price.

The weekly candle formations tell us plenty about trader resolve—or the lack of it. The selling isn’t panicked, but it is organised. Powell’s testimony last week didn’t provide anything near the interest rate jolt some had been positioning for, and that air pocket left in the narrative was instantly reflected in December gold futures being hastily unwound.

So now, with live trading floors more focused on aligning rolling risk through end-of-quarter expiry, short-duration trades are dominating the moves. We’ve reduced gamma exposure ourselves at $3200, let go of residual longs on Tuesday’s pop, and are now watching the 14-day RSI test its early-March levels. That’s not to project reversal, just to highlight where elastic may begin to stretch.

Prices may find temporary footing within the upcoming range, but barring some unforeseen headline or broad risk-off tone, there’s little from a flows perspective to suggest a rebound is likely to be immediate. Timing options around that premise becomes increasingly precise—sell strength, monitor volume per handle, and avoid triangulating too far ahead. Retest zones remain key only so long as volume-fed conviction accompanies them, which so far has been absent across sessions.

This remains a seller-controlled feed, until there’s proof otherwise.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Pound Sterling rose to near 1.3350 against the US Dollar amid weaker US inflation data for April. US headline inflation grew by 2.3%, the lowest in over four years, while core CPI rose by 2.8%, aligning with predictions. The probability of the Federal Reserve maintaining interest rates at 4.25%-4.50% in July stands at 61.4%, a notable increase from last week’s 29.8%. This follows the US-China agreement on tariff reductions, which has affected expectations for rate cuts.

In the UK, a mixed performance was seen against major peers, impacted by labour market data showing reduced job growth and higher unemployment for the three months ending March. This is attributed to businesses preparing for increased social security contributions effective in April. The UK economy is projected to have grown by 0.6% in Q1, surpassing the previous quarter’s 0.1% growth. The Bank of England may raise interest rates if inflation persists, despite cooling price pressures.

Pound Sterling Forecast

The GBP/USD pair has climbed above the 20-day EMA, suggesting a renewed bullish trend. The currency could test the resistance of 1.3445, with 1.3000 serving as strong support. The Pound’s future will be influenced by the UK’s Q1 GDP and factory data.

What we’ve seen so far points to a shift in sentiment favouring Sterling, prompted largely by the softer inflation print out of the US. The 2.3% rise in headline CPI for April marks its weakest pace in over four years – a detail that hasn’t gone unnoticed by markets. The more muted core CPI figure, which came in right along with estimates, added to the perception that inflationary pressure stateside may be waning enough for the Federal Reserve to stand pat on interest rates fairly soon.

Indeed, rate markets have priced in a higher chance of the Fed holding steady at 4.25%-4.50% by July – up sharply from the previous week. This is not just about inflation moderating; it’s also in response to the tariff agreement with Beijing, which suggests easing international cost input pressures. With external trade factors settling somewhat, it’s reasonable to believe the Fed may see less urgency in tightening further.

Economic Tensions in the UK

From our perspective, this tilt in expectation provides space for the Dollar to soften, particularly in pairs like GBP/USD. But domestic data remain key. While Sterling has lifted towards 1.3350, taking out the 20-day EMA in the process, it hasn’t been a smooth climb.

Tensions remain under the surface in the UK economy. The rise in unemployment and slower job creation over Q1 can’t be ignored. Employers appear to be rebalancing ahead of higher National Insurance costs, a move that’s already filtering into hiring decisions. Nevertheless, early GDP readings show the British economy grew by 0.6% in the first quarter – a pick-up from Q4. This misalignment between softer labour and stronger GDP may cause volatility in the weeks ahead.

Bailey has indicated that the Bank of England could still lean on rate hikes if core inflation remains a worry. That decision, however, hinges not just on headline inflation but also on output and wage growth readings. Should services inflation or wage gains remain uncomfortably high, we may see markets adjust once again toward tighter policy expectations.

In terms of technical structure, Sterling now faces a challenge: navigate between the upside test of 1.3445 and the major floor at 1.3000. That band will define most risk-reward calculations over the next month. A daily close above 1.3350 would be confirmation of continuing demand, while a slide back below the 20-day EMA could invite a challenge of 1.3150 levels.

As we position through the next few weeks, factory orders and industrial output figures from the UK will be key triggers. If those rebound in step with Q1’s stronger GDP showing, another leg higher in GBP/USD could be justified. Still, any hawkish tilt in Fed communication – even in a no-hike scenario – might offset current tailwinds.

Monitor the rate futures curve closely. It has become one of the better indicators of short-term direction in this pair. Right now, it leans toward favouring the Pound. But such leanings can pivot quickly with even a modest change in core inflation or employment figures from either side of the Atlantic.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

DarioHealth Corp. reported a quarterly loss of $0.06 per share, better than the expected loss of $0.07, and an improvement from the previous year’s loss of $0.20. This result marked an earnings surprise of 14.29%, with the company having surpassed consensus EPS estimates in the last four quarters.

The company’s revenue for the March 2025 quarter was $6.75 million, which fell short of expectations by 10.21% but was an increase from the previous year’s $5.76 million. DarioHealth has exceeded consensus revenue estimates twice in the past four quarters.

The company’s stock has decreased by approximately 8.2% since the start of the year, compared to the S&P 500’s 0.1% increase. Future performance may depend on management’s insights shared during earnings calls and changes in earnings expectations.

The current consensus estimate for the next quarter is a loss of $0.06 per share on $7.64 million in revenues, and for the fiscal year, a loss of $0.22 per share on $32.02 million in revenues. The Medical – Instruments industry ranks in the top 32% of industries on a specific metric, suggesting potential advantages for companies within it.

Sensus Healthcare, Inc., also in the Medical – Instruments industry, is anticipated to report a quarterly earnings decline of 71.4% year-over-year, with revenues expected to drop 31.8% to $7.27 million. This ongoing performance is under observation, with implications for future investments or forecasts yet undetermined.

In the most recent financial update, DarioHealth trimmed its quarterly loss to $0.06 per share, performing slightly better than expected. Analysts had anticipated a $0.07 loss, so this outperformance — a 14.29% positive surprise — will not have gone unnoticed. The improvement is particularly stark compared with the $0.20 loss recorded in the same quarter last year, which hints at better control over operating costs or revenue stability. Importantly, the firm has now topped per-share estimates in each of the last four quarters, which builds a reputation for delivering at or above target.

Revenue came in at $6.75 million, which marks roughly a 17% year-on-year increase. While this missed consensus by a bit more than 10%, the trend is still upward, though not without hiccups. We should recognise that revenues have only topped expectations twice in the past year — performance here remains somewhat uneven. That inconsistency may be a source of near-term concern for those assessing direction in the options market, especially where positioning is sensitive to revenue momentum.

The broader market — as measured by the S&P 500 — has inched ahead by 0.1% year to date, while DarioHealth stock has dropped by 8.2%. This underperformance deserves attention, particularly if it begins to affect implied volatilities or correlational assumptions in multileg positions. What we note is that price action hasn’t mirrored fundamental improvements, at least not yet. That disconnect may offer some strategic opportunity, depending on how sentiment shifts in the next two cycles.

Consensus estimates for the upcoming quarter see the company again posting a $0.06 per-share loss, but with revenues rising to $7.64 million. We’d need to see a beat here — or at minimum, firm guidance with narrowed loss expectations — to support call-side positioning or limit downside delta exposure. Full-year projections peg revenue at $32.02 million with a reduced loss of $0.22 per share, suggesting gradual progression, though not sharp recovery.

The sector itself — Medical – Instruments — sits in the upper third (top 32%) of industry rankings based on a specific performance metric. While not standout by any means, it does suggest some trading resilience across comparable names. That said, peer signals give us cause to be cautious. Sensus, for instance, is estimated to report a 71.4% year-on-year drop in earnings for the quarter, coupled with a steep 31.8% dip in revenues. The strain here may spill into sentiment models that group these firms together, even if fundamentals differ.

What’s clear is that we should remain focused on how the firm continues to beat EPS forecasts, despite choppy revenue execution. Earnings calls from leadership provide critical insight into this dynamic, and changes in forward estimates are increasingly influencing short-term instruments. It’s no longer just a question of quarterly results — it’s how consistently output aligns with prior guidance and whether conviction in management’s direction holds.

The US dollar has seen a decline, dropping by -1% against the JPY. Its fall against the EUR (-0.35%) and GBP (-0.24%) was less pronounced, but overall, it has lost the gains achieved after the US-China deal. The EURUSD and USDJPY have moved into more neutral zones, whereas the GBPUSD has climbed above the key moving averages.

Central banks have provided important insights, with ECB’s Joachim Nagel optimistic about reaching a 2% inflation target but acknowledging persistent economic uncertainties. The ECB’s decisions will rely on forthcoming data, and Nagel foresees the euro gaining strength as a reserve currency. The Fed’s Goolsbee highlighted the importance of patience with inflation data, emphasising the need to wait for more detailed information before making major policy judgments.

Global Financial Market Overview

US stock futures show a positive trend, with the Dow, S&P, and Nasdaq futures indicating gains following mixed results yesterday. In European markets, indices show mixed results as well, with Germany’s Dax and France’s CAC down, while the UK’s FTSE 100 and Spain’s Ibex increased marginally.

In other markets, crude oil price is down by 1.10%, while gold is lower by 0.91%. Bitcoin remains stable with little change. For economic data, Canada’s building permits are forecasted to decline by -0.5%, and upcoming US inventory data will provide insight into crude oil and other fuel stocks.

This recent stretch of movement in the foreign exchange market underscores a shift in sentiment surrounding the US dollar, particularly in relation to the yen, where the greenback has shed a full percentage point. Although the decreases against the euro and pound sterling were smaller, they completed a broader retracement from the rally sparked by the trade détente with China. All three of the main currency pairs now sit closer to neutral trend levels, with the pound displaying relative momentum by pushing through reference moving averages, hinting at a bit more underlying strength. The implications for pricing are clear: much of the earlier yield-driven support for the dollar has been re-evaluated.

Nagel has spoken about inflation goals with some measured optimism, framing the 2% target as achievable, albeit not yet guaranteed. His mention of remaining headwinds affecting growth sets a tone that, while not downbeat, is far from euphoric. What resonates more deeply is his focus on incoming macroeconomic numbers to shape upcoming policy calls. That places greater sensitivity on forward inflation prints and employment surveys over the next fortnight. His view that the euro should rise in status as a reserve currency adds an interesting angle – not just a technical view but a broader vote of confidence in the region’s fiscal stability.

Meanwhile, Goolsbee has counselled patience, particularly in response to inflation slowing more gradually than desired. The message is unambiguous – rate setters are not yet ready to declare disinflation a closed chapter. That keeps volatility pricing somewhat elevated in short-term interest rate exposures, especially as no firm policy pivot seems imminent. For now, his framework suggests that we hold back from any major repositioning based on isolated monthly prints. Extended price pressures need to ease more steadily before more definite changes in the rate path follow.

Stock Indices and Commodities

Stock indices reflect a bifurcated mood. US futures tick higher after yesterday’s mixed board finish, but in Europe the picture is flatter, with German and French equities facing selling while the UK and Spain managed to eke out slim gains. These regional differences may become more pronounced if corporate earnings continue coming in unevenly. Index correlation is weakening, suggesting individual markets are now responding to localised catalysts instead of moving in step.

As for commodities, oil has softened, down over 1%, tracking both weaker demand prospects and mild oversupply concerns amidst the storage data due from the US. Gold has shown a modest retreat as well – not particularly dramatic, but enough to signal that haven flows are easing, or at least pausing. Bitcoin remains still, which in itself says a great deal – volatility compression at this stage may hint at an impending sharp move, particularly as regulatory murmurs grow louder.

Looking ahead to the immediate data docket, Canadian construction figures may serve as a useful health check on North American real estate demand. But it’s the US inventory numbers, due soon, that are currently attracting the most interest. If stockpiles come in above estimates, further softness in crude is likely, which could spill over into inflation-linked metrics and affect duration plays in risk-sensitive assets.

At this stage, we recognise the necessity for sharper focus on data. Inflation stickiness, currency rebalancing, and uneven equity performance are all feeding into non-linear price reactions. Timing is now everything, and as things stand, it’s better to respond to numbers than narratives.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Gold Prices and the Bullish Pennant Pattern

The focus is on the $3,200 support, marking the pennant’s lower boundary. A confirmed break below this level could lead to a deeper correction, while a move above $3,300 could reaffirm a bullish trend.

From a broad perspective, Gold remains in a consolidation phase after reaching a record high of $3,500 in April. The market expects interest rate cuts while safe-haven demand persists. Until a breakout of the current range occurs, Gold is likely to remain range-bound, influenced by macroeconomic data and Fed policy signals.

Central banks increased their Gold reserves by 1,136 tonnes in 2022, the highest purchase on record, with countries like China, India, and Turkey quickly increasing reserves. Gold has an inverse correlation with the US Dollar and Treasuries. When the Dollar depreciates, Gold tends to rise, serving as a hedge against inflation and a haven asset.

Trade Implications and Strategy

Gold prices are influenced by factors like geopolitical instability and interest rate changes. Yield-less, Gold usually rises with lower interest rates but drops with higher rates. The US Dollar’s strength is a key factor, as a strong Dollar can suppress Gold prices, while a weak Dollar may boost them.

The recent loss of momentum in gold stems largely from shifting expectations about interest rates in the United States. Traders who had priced in a more aggressive easing cycle have had to revise their outlook. Softer inflation figures—while typically supportive of gold—are being weighed against labour market resilience. Powell, for instance, has noted that wage growth remains firm and job creation steady. That combination makes it harder for the Federal Reserve to act swiftly on any dovish pivot.

Price action reveals that we’ve slipped beneath the 20-day moving average, which had previously offered short-term support. The Relative Strength Index hovers near neutral territory, just under 50, reinforcing the view that gold isn’t trending strongly in either direction right now. It’s treading water, essentially, caught between dovish hopes and hawkish caution.

Support around the $3,200 level is now the area to watch. It aligns with the lower edge of a bullish pennant formation. If that line gives way, we should prepare for more downside pressure—a deeper retracement is then likely. That said, any break above $3,300 would suggest strength is returning, potentially inviting trend-followers back in.

For those of us active in the options and futures space, this is a waiting game. Not one to be idle in though—ranges offer opportunities too, especially for calendar spreads or straddles that capitalise on implied volatility mispricing. The key is to accept that the metal may not trend dramatically in the immediate term unless macro data or policy triggers a decisive break above or below this contraction pattern.

The broader story hasn’t changed all that much. We’re still within touching distance of April’s highs, and while momentum has flagged, gold continues to attract demand from official sector buyers. China and others might not be moving as quickly as they did in 2022, but they’re still active, and that matters. These reserve accumulations offer a steady bid—less reactive than ETF flows, but more durable.

Currency strength remains a pivot variable. Whenever the US dollar shows firmness, gold prices come under pressure. Conversely, FX softness tends to breathe some life back into bullion. The inverse pattern with yields hasn’t vanished either. Real rates tick upward, and gold tends to struggle. And when those rates slip, the metal catches a bid.

The next few weeks may offer value for those willing to play the range, rather than betting on a breakout. Directional trades tied to Fed expectations or CPI surprises should be approached with shorter time frames in mind. Monthly expiries could align well with upcoming economic prints—PCE, payrolls, CPI—all of which are capable of moving the needle.

This isn’t a period to chase. Rather, it’s one to position incrementally, using technical signals and macro catalysts together, noting reinforced zones of resistance and support. The market isn’t impulsive at the moment, which rewards precision more than speculation.

We’re watching those long-term buyers—central banks, yes, but also asset managers—stepping in during structural dips. They don’t need confirmation from moving averages or oscillator thresholds. Their flows are anchored to allocation models and multi-quarter outlooks. But in the meantime, until one side gains the upper hand, we’re in a coil. And coils have a habit of snapping.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

OPEC has kept its forecast for global oil demand growth in 2025 and 2026 unchanged. A recent 90-day trade deal between the US and China could support the normalisation of trade flows.

Oil supply outside OPEC+ is projected to increase by 800,000 barrels per day this year, revised down from an earlier estimate of 900,000 barrels per day. There is an expected 5% decrease in investment in exploration and production outside the OPEC+ group in 2025.

Us Oil Supply Growth

The growth forecast for US oil supply in 2025 has been adjusted to 300,000 barrels per day, reduced from a previous figure of 400,000 barrels per day. In April 2025, OPEC+ crude oil output averaged 40.92 million barrels per day, a decline of 106,000 barrels per day from March.

The easing of trade tensions between the US and China is seen as beneficial for the crude oil market. There is potential for breaking out to new highs as the market consolidates at a key resistance zone.

What we’re looking at here is a broadly stable demand outlook on the part of OPEC, which has opted not to revise its projections for 2025 and 2026. That tells us there’s no shift expected from core consumption markets, and no major change anticipated in the rate at which oil is being used globally, at least from their side. So, no ramps or slowdowns from the demand front—just a continuation of earlier expectations.

Meanwhile, on the supply side, things are shifting a little more. The reduction in the forecast for oil output growth outside of OPEC+—trimmed now to 800,000 barrels per day for this year—is indicative of supply tightening slightly more than originally expected. This is reinforced by the updated figures for exploration and production spending, which are now set to fall by 5% in 2025 among producers outside the alliance. Reduced investment tends to show where producer sentiment is heading, and in this case, they don’t appear to be preparing for aggressive output expansion.

Opec Plus Production Fluctuations

The United States figures are even more specific. The projected supply increase for 2025 is being revised down, from 400,000 to 300,000 barrels per day. That adjustment isn’t enormous, but when aligned with falling investment and shrinking non-OPEC+ output growth, it adds another piece to the broader picture. It implies that internal supply growth is losing a bit of momentum.

OPEC+ themselves aren’t exempt from short-term fluctuations either. Their April production was down by over 100,000 barrels a day compared with March. Though not a dramatic fall, it serves as a reminder that even coordinated producers experience volatility in month-to-month output. This may stem from planned maintenance or strategic volume adjustments designed to keep prices within a comfortable range.

Now, the détente between Washington and Beijing—at least in trade terms—adds an element that recent months have lacked: a degree of stability around global trade flows. If that persists through the 90-day window, one of the world’s largest bilateral trading channels becomes less volatile, which tends to improve sentiment across commodity markets, particularly those like crude oil that are sensitive to transport activity and industrial production levels.

Technically, the price action we’re seeing confirms that the market has tested a resistance level and has so far managed to stay there. For those of us tracking derivatives, that’s often where breakouts are born—markets that have failed to push higher tend to retrace, but this one has extended its stay. That suggests the energy behind the move has not dissipated.

Traders would not be wrong to monitor implied volatilities around key expiry points. If resistance does finally give way, what follows may come with increased price range and more pronounced intra-day moves. It’s worth noting how the options structure adjusts with these developments—watch closely for changes in skew, because they can offer early hints of directional bias among large positioning players.

Moreover, front-month time spreads should be observed for any early signs of tightening. If backwardation does steepen while the broader structure holds above resistance, the stronger hands in the market may already be planning for higher spot prices. When spot drawers become more confident, you can often see them pull barrels faster and push front contracts higher relative to future ones.

As prices bump up against these levels, we find ourselves watching fewer fundamentals and paying more attention to positioning mechanics: open interest, roll dates, delta shifts. It’s in these moments that non-linear moves often start.

All told, right now, the data points aren’t creating high drama, but the adjustments—small and steady—are leaning bullish. It doesn’t take declarations to change direction; persistent undercurrents are enough.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US Federal Reserve Vice Chair Philip Jefferson noted that recent inflation data show progress towards the 2% target. However, he warned about the uncertainty in the outlook, as new import tariffs could potentially raise prices.

Jefferson mentioned the current moderately restrictive policy rate is apt for responding to economic changes. While recent inflation data aligns with the 2% goal, he cautioned about the future uncertainty due to tariffs.

Impact of Tariffs

The possibility of tariffs leading to higher inflation remains uncertain in terms of its duration. Economic growth is expected to slow because of trade policy, but expansion is still anticipated over the year.

The first quarter GDP data exaggerated the slowdown in economic activity according to Jefferson. He affirmed that the labour market remains strong, but the impact of tariffs on persistent inflation depends on various factors.

What Jefferson is drawing attention to here, in fairly measured terms, is a gradually improving picture on inflation — but one that remains fragile, especially with new pressures in the background. While the Fed is seeing better alignment with its long-term price target, any optimism there is immediately checked by external pressures that tend to push cost levels up, such as tariffs. These are not small adjustments, and while their effect may not be long-lasting, they could throw off expectations, particularly around core readings.

Importantly, his view on the current policy rate — describing it as “moderately restrictive” — suggests we should not expect sweeping interventions on short notice. This reinforces the idea that the current stance is likely to be maintained unless something shifts dramatically in the data.

Implications for Derivatives Traders

When Jefferson refers to the first quarter GDP data overstating the slowdown, what he’s likely suggesting is that seasonal or temporary factors affected the official output numbers more than actual domestic momentum did. So while surface-level indicators pointed to a sharper deceleration, underlying demand may have held up more than those figures indicated.

For us, the key takeaway isn’t only about steady rates or tariffs themselves, but about the broader volatility in reaction functions. Derivatives traders ought to widen the lens beyond just front-month contracts or headline prints. There’s a chance that short-term rate volatility remains suppressed, but pricing risk further out may warrant closer attention. Especially where policy reaction asymmetry is likely — the Fed appears disinclined to ease into near-term strength, but prepared to extend tightness if pressures re-emerge.

The strong labour market points to resilience in domestic demand, which increases the likelihood that rate-sensitive instruments do not price in cuts too early. If you’re involved in macro positioning, it would be imprudent to rely too heavily on expected disinflation being straightforward or uninterrupted.

We should be preparing for positioning around rate hold scenarios that last longer than anticipated. Interest rate derivatives that lean too heavily into pricing in policy adjustments in the upcoming quarters may be misaligned, especially if real activity stays buoyant. The market, in our view, may continue underestimating policy patience when inflation moderates for short periods but doesn’t fully embed.

Eyeing vol structures may prove worthwhile. Given the potential tug-of-war between disinflation and trade-induced cost pressures, there could be sudden readjustments in the mid-term curve. As Jackson remains cautious, traders operating around policy expectations over a 3- to 6-month horizon would do well to build in wider tolerances for data surprises.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Germany’s Chancellor states the commitment to preventing a long-term trade conflict with the United States. Germany aims to support the European Union in securing numerous trade agreements.

Efforts will be made to address one-sided dependencies on China under the banner of strategic de-risking. An agreement on the US-EU trade deal remains pending, and a 10% tariff on EU imports is becoming a possibility.

Complexity Of International Trade Relations

There is uncertainty about the EU’s capacity to withstand a prolonged trade war with the US. This situation underscores the complexity of international trade relations.

These remarks from the German Chancellor reflect a renewed effort to contain potential friction while maintaining influence in global supply chains. The references to strategic de-risking signal an intent to rebalance economic exposure—especially as Europe begins recalibrating its stance towards Beijing. While the position remains diplomatic on the surface, the clear acknowledgment of dependencies suggests that a shift in trade policy has already begun behind closed doors.

The pending arrangement between the United States and the European Union isn’t just a hypothetical point of conversation—it now carries exact implications for market participants, particularly after comments surrounding a possible 10% tariff on European products. Though not yet implemented, the pricing in of such a measure may require close monitoring over the next few weeks. Pricing models relying on past tariff environments could become unreliable if sentiment hardens further.

The Chancellor’s statements aim to temper reactions but they also highlight the limitations of thin optimism. Markets often react not to announcements but to energy behind the lobbies influencing them. In this case, we’re potentially heading towards more protective stances between partners who were seen as aligned not long ago. Energy, automotive, and luxury sectors—and the derivative instruments tied to them—could see increasing volume as hedging exposure becomes a direct response rather than a precaution.

Volatility In Trade Policy

Scholz is effectively walking a line between long-term realignment and short-term diplomatic containment. The problem for us lies in the delay: negotiations drag, but pricing pressures escalate quickly. Bonds, equity futures, and currency derivatives will move not because of outcomes, but because of the added delay itself. In the short term, volatility on euro-dollar derivatives should be expected, particularly near key option expiries aligned with expected trade policy announcements.

Viewing this through the lens of sentiment and positioning, liquidity may thin out on certain forward contracts due to hedging caution—less volume, wider spreads. We must also consider correlations: tech-linked contracts may behave differently than defensive sectors, influenced heavily by transatlantic exposure ratios.

Pressure might also mount from secondary effects. For example, if Asia begins to interpret this shift as a new front in trade restrictions, there could be additional flow into commodity-linked hedges. We shouldn’t dismiss the likelihood of hedging activity spilling into pairs like USD/JPY or EUR/CHF, which are instinctively treated as safe tensions rise.

Structural fragmentation is becoming part of the conversation. Any remaining expectation of a seamless supply system is being dismantled, sector by sector. The consequence? A long-needed reassessment of covariant risk in multi-country exposure. Let’s be ready for implied volatilities to deviate markedly from realised ones. Portfolio implications won’t just be mechanical—they’ll be dictated by the order and pace at which these strings of announcements are interpreted by capital flows.

We are, in effect, not responding to decisions but to the prolonged absence of them.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The GBP/USD pair experienced a rise above key technical levels largely due to the general weakening of the US Dollar. This increase saw the pair gaining nearly 1% in a day, reaching a fresh weekly high around 1.3350 during the European trading session.

US inflation data contributed to the Dollar’s weakness, as the Consumer Price Index indicated annual inflation dropped to 2.3% in April from 2.4% in March. This influenced the GBP/USD to gain momentum during the American trading hours.

Elliott Wave Analysis

The primary Elliott Wave count on the GBP/USD hourly chart suggests the end of a corrective Wave (C) near 1.3140. This could mark a potential bottoming out, indicating the start of a new rally.

The bullish shift is supported by views expressed by Huw Pill, the Chief Economist at the Bank of England, who addressed inflationary issues in the UK. His comments coincided with the pair’s positive movement, underscoring ongoing market reactions to macroeconomic updates.

The information in this article is for informational purposes only, carrying risks and uncertainties in trading, which should always be carefully considered. The responsibility for any investment decisions remains with the reader.

With the GBP/USD pair pushing past technical resistance near 1.3350, attention was firmly drawn to the underlying momentum seen in the European session. The move upward was spurred not by sterling strength alone but largely traced back to softer data from the US. Specifically, the retreat in US Consumer Price Index figures to 2.3% adds to the view that inflationary pressure is beginning to cool more steadily than anticipated. For perspective, the March figure stood higher, and the monthly decline serves to scale back expectations for further aggressive tightening by the Fed.

Market Dynamics and Projections

This subtly shifts the environment that traders are navigating, as the justification for holding a stronger Dollar becomes thinner. When market participants react to inflation falling faster than projections, the Dollar tends to weaken—this is precisely what we observed during the US session.

From a technical analysis perspective, the completion of the Elliott Wave (C) near the 1.3140 level casts a more bullish shadow over the pair. This isn’t merely a corrective bounce. If the narrative is correct, the retracement has already run its course, and what’s developing now could be interpreted as the early stages of a broader impulse wave, not a simple upward blip. For those who analyse the chart structure closely, such transitions can provide a cleaner framework for positioning, particularly as upward momentum indicates more than a reactionary pop.

Meanwhile, when Pill weighed in on domestic inflationary pressures in the UK, his remarks earned attention for being relatively measured. Ongoing stickiness in UK price rises strengthens the case against swift rate cuts by the Bank of England. As we interpret it, this has buoyed the currency. His comments served more as a reminder than a forecast, but they were aligned well with how the pound traded throughout the session. It’s not just what is said—it’s when it’s said, and in this case, the timing lent added clarity to traders mapping future interest rate paths.

In the short term, price breaching the highs around 1.3350 sets a clear marker to watch. Long positions that built near the prior correction zone now ride with the trend, and profit-taking behaviour near resistance levels may provide added volume clues. We’ve often looked for these kinds of signals to confirm trend resilience or sniff out early signs of fatigue.

In upcoming sessions, volatility around Dollar inputs—particularly anything related to employment or forward guidance from Fed officials—will offer further shape to implied rate differentials. Similarly, with the UK not far from CPI updates of its own, traders may revisit current longs or shorts on GBP in light of any upside surprises. Reaction speed to these releases, not just direction, will matter for risk management.

Position sizing and stop placement remain central. Knowing when a move is overstretched compared to prior volatility bands keeps exposures appropriate, rather than emotional. When momentum strengthens rapidly, spreads widen and entries become less forgiving. We’ve found it useful to stay reactive with limits when underlying fundamentals and price action both reinforce a scenario—but not overstay entries past key retracement markers.

For the time being, expect the market to continue playing short-term Dollar softness against resilient UK inflation expectations. Relative central bank narratives are diverging more than converging. Until that trend shifts, we’ll be watching closely for momentum confirmations through volume and volatility expansions, particularly near round-number barriers where institutional interest tends to cluster.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.