For over 25 years, there has been concern about human traders being replaced by machines, yet more people are trading than ever. The proliferation of trading algorithms has created a mixed landscape, with both successes and failures, in the financial market.

Google DeepMind has introduced AlphaEvolve, an AI agent capable of creating brand-new algorithms, which are then used within the company’s infrastructure. This innovation combines Google’s Gemini language models with evolutionary techniques, leading to improvements in efficiency and problem-solving in data centres and AI training systems.

AlphaEvolve acts by integrating creativity with algorithmic scrutiny, refining solutions generated by large language models. This capability has led to AlphaEvolve solving complex problems that have eluded researchers, increasing the system’s appeal in various industries.

While the potential applications of AlphaEvolve in financial markets are considerable, similar technology could also be applied to military uses. The dual-use nature of this technology raises concerns and opportunities, as it may shape various aspects of both commerce and defence.

What we have here is a shift pushed forward by innovation in machine learning and artificial intelligence. The recent addition of AlphaEvolve, which draws on language processing and evolutionary logic, marks a new phase in the development of automated systems that not only follow commands but can also create novel solutions from scratch. DeepMind’s ability to blend structured models with adaptive techniques is allowing it to tackle challenges that would take teams of humans weeks or even months to untangle—if at all.

The early progress in data centre optimisation and AI model development suggests that these systems are not restricted to lab environments—they’re already supporting tangible improvements in infrastructure performance and operational cost reduction. These benefits may seem removed from the trading desk at first glance, but they’re not. Systems designed to autonomously generate new algo-driven strategies don’t need to remain confined to server farm scheduling or mechanical repair analysis. If something is already selecting optimal paths in dense operational systems, then it takes very little adjustment for it to refocus on predicting liquidity flows or detecting arbitrage through latency mapping.

Not everyone will be aware that these models aren’t rule-based in the old sense. They don’t depend on humans feeding them if-then parameters. Instead, they develop reflective strategies through trial and refinement, which is where things become more nuanced. Rather than imposing logic upon data, they learn patterns by resisting failure across simulations, often creating structures that traditional quantitative analysts might not even recognise when reviewing code outputs. For those accustomed to measuring confidence via backtest consistency and drawdown curves, this justifies a realignment in expectation management.

So it’s worth noting what Hassabis indicated by rolling this project past only the online research forums and into internal deployment. These are tools capable of not only handling vast and noisy datasets but also making decisions about how methodologically to do so. As traders, we’ve sometimes measured our edge by how well we understand existing market behaviour. Now, edge may sit where systems improvise beneath the audit tools, staying just ahead of the observable signal.

This doesn’t mean handing control away. It does, however, raise the bar for model interpretation. Structures once seen as advanced—like sentiment parsing engines or multi-factor risk weightings—may soon be considered basic. Particularly if we observe that organic code can evolve approaches that shift intraday as needed. What that suggests, and it’s already happening piecemeal, is that responsiveness will extend from strategy rebalancing into continuous redefinition.

Suleyman has already engaged with the question of oversight, especially considering that the same technology can cross sectors with only domain-specific changes. Re-application of such systems in secure environments introduces variables that, while not probable in most retail cases, can distort market input from external actors. That adds a layer of caution—a higher premium may need to be placed on validating feed integrity and confirming model behaviour over extended periods, even when headline results seem stable.

We aren’t just looking at speed or volume anymore. What’s emerging is a method of trading that simulates learning inside execution, which is different from adapting between sessions or reallocating during a correction. Think of it as the trades themselves becoming educational processes. Algorithms don’t just respond; they adjust their logic when exposed to new inputs, meaning historical bias correction starts moving from feature selection to method rewriting—on the fly.

This development does not require retooling every system immediately, but it does warrant scenario planning with these tools in mind. Start by segmenting what parts of the system still depend on fixed structures and batch-tested logic. Compare that with areas where adaptation could be low-cost and error-tolerant. For those positions, modelling systems that test shifting logic rather than fixed indicators may narrow lag times and lessen response drift during volatility.

In the coming week, therefore, models producing unusually consistent performance without clear basis in standard metrics shouldn’t be dismissed too quickly. Scrutiny of input fidelity is key, but so is remaining open to the idea that in certain market pockets, decision logic has already started to move away from coded scripts and toward self-selecting formulas. We’re already monitoring for this through unexplained coupling across asset classes and what we initially thought were data glitches—turns out they may not be glitches at all.

The Canadian Dollar (CAD) saw a slight dip against the US Dollar (USD) on Wednesday, undoing previous gains and placing the USD/CAD close to the 200-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA). The currency struggles for momentum amid limited Canadian economic data and global focus on US-related news.

This week’s currency movements show a drop of over 0.25% for CAD against USD, with the USD/CAD remaining below 1.4000. Upcoming US economic indicators include the Producer Price Index (PPI) and Retail Sales, which are expected to influence market trends.

Technical Barriers for CAD

The CAD faces technical barriers near the 1.4000 level and 200-day EMA at approximately 1.4030. The ability for USD/CAD to surpass these hurdles remains challenging, especially with the current market sentiment.

The factors affecting CAD include Bank of Canada’s interest rates, Oil prices, trade balance, and economic health. The central bank’s policies significantly influence the CAD, with higher rates generally strengthening the currency. Oil prices are pivotal, as they are closely linked to CAD’s valuation due to Canada’s export profile.

Key economic indicators like GDP and employment play a role in CAD movements, with strong data typically supporting the currency. Conversely, weak data can lead to CAD depreciation.

So far this week, we’ve watched the Canadian dollar give back some earlier gains, slipping slightly against the US dollar. This pullback places the USD/CAD exchange rate just under its 200-day Exponential Moving Average, currently hovering near 1.4030. Price action shows an uneven tone, hinting that buying momentum has faded right where it’s likely to face heavier resistance. Given the narrow trading behaviour and softer performance of the CAD, we’re seeing a market that lacks domestic catalysts, increasingly leaning on external developments for direction.

Focus on US Data

Without a steady stream of Canadian economic releases this week, attention has effectively gravitated towards US data, especially with key reports like the Producer Price Index and Retail Sales still to come. In previous cycles, even marginal surprises in these figures have led to quick repricing in USD-related pairs, and this setup is no different. Traders with exposure along the curve are almost certainly pricing in a reactive market once those figures land.

From a technical perspective, there’s been little appetite to push USD/CAD beyond the 1.4000 mark. That round number, combined with the longer-term EMA barrier close by, serves as a psychological and structural hurdle. There’s no clear sign that those levels will give way without a compelling trigger, particularly one out of the US side of the ledger. We’ll be keeping that zone under close watch through the next couple of sessions.

On the macro front, several moving parts continue to shape thinking around CAD. The Bank of Canada has maintained a cautious but firm hold on interest rates, responding to broader inflation concerns and a still-uncertain employment picture. Rate expectations, already largely priced in, suggest that without a shift in tone from policymakers, there’s unlikely to be a material boost to CAD in the short term.

Oil remains closely tethered to CAD sentiment as well. With global benchmarks struggling to maintain upward momentum amid conflicting supply signals, it’s been difficult to find sustainable support for commodity-linked currencies. Any rallies in crude have been brief, and Canadian dollar gains alongside have been restrained.

Trade data haven’t introduced any surprises substantial enough to stir fresh positioning, and unless GDP or employment numbers in the weeks ahead show clearer strength, the currency seems more likely to react than to lead. A reactive CAD—for now—suggests range-bound trading and more emphasis on tactical plays rather than longer-term directional positioning.

For those navigating these conditions, it’s less about chasing breakouts just yet, and more about reading second-order signals: rate spreads, oil movements, and how risk sentiment shapes flows. Staying nimble remains key.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Crude oil futures settled at $63.15, increasing by $0.52 or 0.82%. The highest price reached today was $63.64, while the lowest was $62.78.

The price remains below the 50% retracement level of $64.71 from the 2020 low. On April 23, there was a brief climb above this level to $64.83 before falling back, marking this level as a technical barrier.

Geopolitical Impact on Market Sentiment

Geopolitical factors may affect market sentiment, as Ukraine and Russia are planning talks. There is uncertainty about the attendance of prominent figures such as President Putin and former President Trump.

Market support is building due to a reassessment of recession threats. The latest U.S. crude oil inventory report disclosed an unexpected increase of 3.454 million barrels, contrary to a predicted draw of 1.078 million. Concurrently, gasoline inventories saw a larger-than-anticipated drop of 1.022 million barrels, signifying continued strong demand.

The price movement seen in crude oil futures reveals a cautiously advancing market still reacting to technical constraints and conflicting signals. At $63.15, futures have edged up modestly—though not with the strength to clear the resistance around the mid-point retracement from 2020. That $64.71 level, breached ever so briefly a few sessions ago, continues to act as a technical ceiling, reinforced by the swift rejection back below it once crossed. The market recognises this repeated reaction as evidence of unresolved sentiment about the current trend’s momentum.

From a broader standpoint, the discussion between Eastern European officials has triggered a reassessment of political risk by market participants. Though the likelihood of either leader actually attending remains unclear, their absence would leave diplomatic progress in a kind of limbo. The markets, as ever, dislike ambiguity. That lack of resolution is reflected in the tepid nature of today’s climb, as traders hold back from aggressive positioning.

At the same time, optimism has crept in from an unexpected direction—recession expectations are being re-evaluated. The stronger signals in petrol demand came through sharply in the inventory adjustments announced in the U.S. figures. The draw in gasoline stockpiles surpassed forecasts by over 500,000 barrels, which shows that consumers continue to fuel up—an important piece of evidence arguing against any assumptions of an economic slowdown. On the flip side, the climb of more than 3 million barrels in crude supply was the opposite of what was projected. This divergence implies that while refineries are still turning crude into products at a high rate, domestic production or import adjustments may be creating a build-up that was not previously priced in.

Balancing Supply and Demand

We now see a pressure point between supply-side rebalancing and continued demand. That pressure has to resolve itself over the next fortnight, particularly as attention will eventually shift towards forward-looking economic data and how it may feed into government and central bank decisions. A close watch should be kept on inventory changes and refining margins—both show whether current demand is being sustained or fueled by short-term cyclical behaviour.

From the charts, it’s increasingly clear that the market lacks conviction. The resistance near $64.70 has now been tested and held multiple times. This pattern, especially when repeated alongside inventory surprises, becomes a message. While the upside potential is still technically intact, the durability of any rally from here would depend on whether stockpiles begin to reflect consistent declines.

Support can be noted near $62.78—today’s low—which matches well with levels seen over the last ten trading days. That suggests a floor is forming that bulls may look to exploit if fresh buying volumes enter. This also implies that any dip to this zone might be short-lived unless accompanied by worrying signals from outside the commodity itself, such as broader economic contraction or geopolitical flare-ups.

As the talk shifts increasingly to demand indicators, positioning may skew further toward upside speculation—but only if price manages to break out of its coil. Should resistance be overcome and backed by inventory trends reversing, we may see a sharper adjustment in future contracts. Until then, short-term price movement appears likely to stay in a tight range.

We must weigh positioning carefully, particularly during data-heavy sessions when surprises have recently become more common than not. With each report, the probability of directional shifts increases, and these are rarely priced in fully beforehand. That introduces potential for volatility, especially around settlement windows.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US Treasury yields have risen, with the yield on the 10-year note increasing by 5.5 basis points to 4.525%. This comes as market participants process US inflation data and anticipate the Producer Price Index (PPI) and Retail Sales figures.

The two-year US Treasury yield has gained three basis points, standing at 4.049%. US Treasury yields are near the week’s highs due to improved market sentiment following a temporary tariff suspension between the US and China.

Us China Tariff Pause

The US and China have agreed on a 90-day pause in tariffs, reducing duties by over 115%. Despite such developments, the current monetary policy by the Fed addresses economic changes, although future outcomes remain uncertain.

Concerns persist as tariffs could contribute to rising inflation, but the effect’s duration is unclear. The US 10-year real yields have climbed three basis points to 2.21%.

The Federal Reserve continues to hold the authority in monetary policy through interest rate adjustments. It aims to manage inflation and employment, using tools such as interest rates, Quantitative Easing (QE), and Quantitative Tightening (QT).

The Fed’s actions influence the US Dollar’s strength. By controlling borrowing costs, the Fed attempts to maintain economic stability.

Us Treasury Yield Recalibration

With the sharp move in US Treasury yields—especially the 10-year now sitting north of 4.5%—there’s a clear recalibration of interest rate expectations underway. That 5.5 basis point rise on the 10-year points to a market that’s leaning more towards the idea that inflation might not cool as quickly as previously expected. The anticipation around PPI and Retail Sales this week could very well harden or reverse that view, depending on how the data unfolds.

Real yields, which strip out the effects of inflation, also inched higher. They’ve hit 2.21%, a level that suggests inflation-adjusted returns are becoming more attractive. This is the kind of move you don’t ignore if you’re using Treasuries as directional hedge references or need clearer signals for long-dated pricing.

The short end of the curve—those two-year yields nudging up to 4.049%—continues to reflect near-term rates expectations. There’s still no obvious cut priced in with conviction, and considering economic data remains resilient, it’s understandable why policymakers might hold current rates for longer, even in the face of external trade tension relief.

Following the latest truce in trade measures—the 90-day tariff pause forming the basis for improved sentiment—the market has responded with positioning that favours risk-on trades. However, such shifts can reverse quickly if tariffs are reintroduced or if the inflation pass-through from prior measures persists longer than anticipated. The impact of tariffs on headline inflation is often delayed, and depending on import channels, there’s no guarantee that easing duties will unwind the pressure where it counts.

There’s a strong likelihood that future monetary steps hinge more on incoming data than fixed timelines. Powell’s emphasis has consistently been aimed at controlling inflation while avoiding overtightening. But with yields moving up in lockstep with sentiment changes, there’s a re-pricing happening across rate-sensitive instruments. This has obvious implications on dollar strength, especially as currency traders pivot around real rate differentials.

For our purposes, it’s essential to treat current levels not just as a trend but as potential markers for recalibration. The vertical structure of the Treasury curve, now moderately flatter, implies tighter conditions ahead—or at least an economic environment where front-end expectations are being reined in while longer-term risks are being priced anew. These are setups that tend to produce compression within volatility curves and can shift gamma exposure quite meaningfully in short timeframes.

What we’re seeing now is a reflection of conviction returning to options books, particularly on rates. Adjustments in premium, notably in shorter-dated contracts, indicate that directional plays are being favoured over range-bound views. In that context, performance must be adjusted more dynamically. Traders may find that old models relying on static vol assumptions produce edge-worn outcomes under this refitted regime.

We’re watching how pricing moves around the PPI and retail numbers, as these tend to feed directly into both Fed outlooks and market-based inflation estimates like breakevens. Once those prints land, the curve may either resume its bear steepening or flatten further, depending on whether growth expectations remain solid or not.

Positioning now involves staying tight to new breakpoints on duration and being aware of convexity shifts as rates continue to test new near-term limits. It’s less about directional bias here and more about precision in placement, especially when broader liquidity remains uneven.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Goldman Sachs predicts a rise in core retail sales for April, with an expected 0.4% monthly increase. This uptick is attributed to precautionary consumer spending in anticipation of upcoming tariff-related price hikes.

In contrast, headline retail sales are projected to remain unchanged. Weak performance in the auto sector and declining gasoline prices are expected to negate the positive trends seen in other areas.

Impact Of Tariffs On Consumer Behavior

The impact of tariffs is becoming apparent as consumer behaviours adjust to trade policy changes. This shift suggests a pattern of demand moving forward to pre-empt price increases.

The upcoming US retail sales report, scheduled for release on Thursday at 8:30 am ET, is seen as an early indicator of how tariffs influence consumer behaviour. It shows robust core demand, hidden by flat overall sales figures due to specific industry downturns.

What we’re seeing here is a clear separation between the narrower core retail sales measurement and the broader headline figure. Core retail sales, which strip out the more volatile components like automobiles and fuel, are forecast to show solid growth. That matters more in contexts where underlying trends in consumption are of interest—especially when price stability and policy risks are in play. It’s the kind of signal that suggests households are still willing to spend, but they’re being strategic about it.

Goldman Sachs expects a 0.4% monthly climb in this metric, and that’s being linked to buyers taking action early, possibly with an eye on rising costs tied to newly announced tariffs. It’s less about confidence and more about prudent timing. This anticipation-led spending doesn’t come from optimism—it comes from calculation, a rational response to trade tensions.

At the same time, total sales aren’t budging. That’s mainly thanks to a slump in auto-related purchases and falling prices at the pump. Lower gasoline prices tend to put more discretionary funds into household budgets, but the effect is often uneven. Meanwhile, auto data is likely suffering from tightening credit conditions and a decline in seasonal demand—something we’ve had on the radar since the first quarter.

Headline Numbers And Market Implications

So we’ve now got this awkward mix: encouraging internal firmness in consumption, yet patchy readings on the whole. And here’s the thing. The headline number, when flat, can mislead if one doesn’t parse out the mechanics beneath. A flat figure isn’t necessarily neutral; in this context, it’s being dragged down by a narrow set of sectors rather than an across-the-board slowdown, and that’s an important distinction.

For those of us watching short-term positioning in rate-sensitive trades, the difference between the core and headline numbers should guide decision-making in the days ahead. If the core print comes in as expected—or firmer—the pressure builds for a rethink in current pricing. It could advance the case that demand is resilient, even when adjusted for the distortions caused by specific sector weak spots.

The real takeaway here isn’t just in the directional move—up or down—but in what’s driving the consumer. When households shuffle forward spending into the present to avoid paying more later, it sets up a possible soft patch in coming months. That kind of front-loading has downstream effects, especially if inflation expectations become embedded and drive more of this sort of activity.

Thursday’s retail sales release, scheduled early in the trading day, may well prompt repricing in short-term volatility, especially in correlation with Fed expectations. The degree to which consumer demand is perceived as tariff-insulated or tariff-driven will likely dominate reactions.

There’s also the possibility of further skewed readings next month if this timing effect persists. We should watch for aftershocks in durable goods and apparel categories, areas which could have absorbed a meaningful chunk of pre-emptive buying. That brings us to the question of sustainability. A strong print now at the cost of a weaker print later might produce uneven sentiment, especially for those shadowing the yield curve closely.

All of this points to a market dynamic where near-term strength may be more noise than trend. But markets tend to move on levels, not only stories. So how the figure resonates against prior estimates—and revised prior months—could bring out activity in option structures tied to consumption-sensitive sectors.

Consumer escape behaviour, automatic assumptions about rate cuts, and the reshuffling of sectoral leaderboards all matter here. It’s not just another report—it’s an input that presses against existing positions, some of which have been built on a softer growth thesis. We’ll be watching that tension as it plays out through positioning and skew, beginning Thursday morning.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Gold fell to $3,182 as optimism around US-China trade eased safe-haven demand. The US Dollar softened, with the DXY near 100.60, following lower-than-expected inflation figures and US-South Korea currency talks.

Positive geopolitical sentiment and risk appetite surged, affecting gold and pushing US yields higher. Key economic data anticipated this week include PPI and Retail Sales, expected to influence Federal Reserve decisions.

Gold Demand And Inflation Figures

Gold slipped below $3,200 due to reduced Chinese ETF demand and US trade talks with Japan and South Korea. US April CPI was 2.3% YoY, below expectations, signalling slower inflation progress amid tariff uncertainties.

Market sentiment shows a 49.9% chance of a Fed rate cut in September. Speculation continues regarding the Trump administration’s preference for a weaker USD and its influence on exchange rates.

Technical indicators demonstrate a bearish trend for the DXY, with the RSI and other metrics showing neutral to mild selling conditions. Support and resistance levels are identified around 100.60, indicating potential price movements.

The US-China trade war, initiated by tariffs in 2018, persists under President Trump with new tariffs planned. This has impacted global economics with increased trade barriers and inflationary pressures.

Impact Of Tariffs And Trade Policies

With geopolitical tensions easing and headline inflation undershooting expectations, gold has seen considerable downside momentum, falling below $3,200. The muted demand from Chinese exchange-traded products has added to the drag. Meanwhile, the US Dollar Index (DXY) remains under pressure near the 100.60 level, weighed down by weak consumer price data and renewed diplomatic efforts, notably in the realm of currency coordination between Washington and Seoul.

That 2.3% year-on-year increase in April CPI, coming in lower than expected, fuels the argument that the Fed may have more room to pivot on rates without risking a price surge. Such data reinforces the view that inflation might not be accelerating at a pace previously feared, especially once tariff-related base effects are stripped away. Risk appetite, in this context, has strengthened, with both US Treasuries and equity markets responding in kind by rotating out of safe-havens like gold.

US yields have crept higher on the back of this recalibration, with traders now closely eyeing upcoming PPI figures and retail sales data. Both have the potential to either support the soft inflation narrative or disrupt it entirely. Should input costs begin to creep upwards once more, the case for sustained monetary easing would weaken. As it stands, the probability of a Fed rate cut in September hovers just below 50%, reflecting a market still divided on direction.

The DXY’s technical setup points to a weak posture, though not yet an aggressively bearish one. Momentum indicators are showing neither extremes of overbought nor oversold—suggesting that we are in more of a wait-and-see phase, pending fundamental catalysts. Price action will likely oscillate around the present support and resistance bands at 100.60 until more decisive data emerges.

On the trade front, tariffs remain a central tool for the White House, and the newest set of levies continues the protectionist path set in motion six years ago. This strategy has shaken commodity markets, especially where raw imports see direct impact from duties, often distorting typical cost structures for end-consumers. It’s not just about bilateral friction with Beijing any longer—negotiations have expanded to include Tokyo and Seoul, adding complexity to trade-based foreign exchange positioning.

From our perspective, one has to weigh not only economic releases but also the political tone out of Washington. There have been consistent signals favouring a softer greenback, presumably to provide export competitiveness. That, in turn, tempers the natural rally one might usually expect in an uncertain macro setting. If further confirmation emerges around policy signals, price values across FX and metals could quickly recalibrate, especially with risk-on markets preferring clarity and lower volatility.

Those engaged in interest rate or currency exposure positioning should stay attentive to breakouts around the edges of this DXY range. Any breach below support could add weight to dollar-bearish trades, particularly against higher-yielding or commodity-tied pairs. Similarly, in the bullion markets, continued ETF liquidation combined with higher bond yields could press gold lower, unless inflation expectations revive unexpectedly. The current configuration rewards those who follow developments closely rather than assume any longer-term directional bias.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

EUR/USD hovered around the 1.1200 mark on Wednesday’s session. Short-term pressure was noted amidst support from long-term trends, revealing a cautious yet supportive market environment.

The pair displayed a stable stance as it transitioned towards the Asian trading session. The technical indicators showed mixed signals with short-term caution but longer-term support might sustain recent gains.

Technical Analysis

The Relative Strength Index rested near 40, indicating neutrality. The Moving Average Convergence Divergence showed selling momentum, synchronised with cautious short-term averages, while the Williams Percent Range indicated no immediate directional moves.

Different moving averages suggest mixed outcomes. The 20-day Simple Moving Average pointed downwards, indicating short-term resistance, whereas the 100-day and 200-day averages fostered robust support.

Support areas were observed at 1.1199, 1.1128, and 1.1092, with resistance at 1.1238 and 1.1242. Exceeding the resistance may signal a breakout, whereas falling below support could prompt a short-term downturn.

What we’ve seen over the past few sessions in EUR/USD is a rather restrained environment, where short bursts of pressure haven’t yet disrupted the larger structural drift. In Wednesday’s trade, the pair hovered tightly around 1.1200, refusing to commit strongly in either direction. That’s usually a sign that short-term players remain tentative, even as longer-term factors still offer moderate guidance.

The session rolling into Asia retained that quiet tone. Price action didn’t signal urgency, but rather a waiting pattern, which tends to suggest hesitancy in the near term. It reflects a situation where sellers remain slightly active, but without clear direction from larger flows. Indicators sent conflicting messages, and that blend of data tells us there’s no immediate conviction. For now, short-term negativity hasn’t penetrated the more supportive longer-range backdrop.

Price Analysis

With the RSI lingering close to 40, it’s not pressing into oversold conditions, and equally, it’s not indicating the kind of strength that might trigger a bullish follow-through. MACD readings stayed beneath the signal line—momentum tilted lower, but not sharply, so any ongoing weakness might not spiral unless something more reactive comes through via external drivers. Meanwhile, the Williams %R sitting in neutral terrain endorses this hesitation. It’s not picking up strong positioning cues from speculative money.

Looking at the simple moving averages offers more concrete guidance. The 20-day SMA heading downward places pressure on upward moves, especially as it clusters close to current pricing. That dynamic places extra strain on any rebound attempt. By contrast, the longer 100- and 200-day averages below current levels suggest that medium to longer-term interest might still offer a platform on declines. These price levels act as gravity zones—likely to attract if prices fall, and likely to repel further drop if the broader tone holds steady.

We’ve seen identifiable horizontal support just under spot—especially around 1.1199 and deeper at 1.1128 and 1.1092. Should the pair dip beneath these thresholds, it opens space for a confident push lower, possibly inviting heavier short interest. On the higher end, nearby resistance near 1.1238 and slightly above that at 1.1242 come into play. If the pair breaks through that upper band with staying power, it would point to fresh positioning efforts and could lead to faster gains as resting buy orders get triggered.

Overall, the structure remains intact, but traders should watch very carefully how price behaves around these compression zones. Momentum is restrained for now, but that can change quickly if external events sharpen investor appetite one way or the other. The range can’t hold indefinitely.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The market has adjusted expectations, removing 60 basis points of Federal Reserve easing anticipated for the upcoming year. Initially, two weeks ago, there were expectations for 131 basis points in easing by the April 2026 FOMC meeting.

Currently, this forecast has decreased to 71 basis points as the market responds positively to the reduction in US-China tariffs. There has been further movement with a September rate cut once fully priced in, now reduced to 91%.

Implications On Risk Assets

This adjustment benefits risk assets, as it implies considerable support from the Federal Reserve, in addition to a potential reappearance of economic policies similar to those previously associated with Trump. The situation for the US dollar is more complex; any economic weakness could trigger a sharp adjustment in interest rates.

What the existing section is pointing out, in fairly clear terms, is that traders and analysts had expected considerably more rate cuts from the US Federal Reserve—specifically around 131 basis points by April 2026. In real terms, that’s over 1.25% worth of rate reductions. But that has now been dialled back to just 71 basis points. So, while cuts are still forecast, they’ll likely be smaller and slower to come through. Most of that shift has come in the past fortnight.

The change in sentiment seems to be driven, at least partly, by a better tone in trade between the US and China. Removal of tariffs improves business conditions and lifts optimism across global markets. The pricing of a rate cut as early as September was viewed as close to certain—above 90% probability—but that figure has also eased off. The market now treats it as only likely, not definite.

For those of us watching how this all plays into risk assets, the general takeaway is that equities and similar positions may find a firmer footing. Monetary policy isn’t turning as restrictive as feared. There may still be less easing but not an abrupt halt. Even with reduced expectations, central bank support remains—for now.

Powell’s central bank hasn’t shut the door on action. Rather, it’s taking time. And if the prospect of lower tariffs continues to bolster sentiment or even raises growth potential, that could further push market pricing of cuts further out. However, we also reckon that any bump in jobs data or wages might see these figures retreat again. It’s clear the pricing is heavily data-dependent.

Considerations For Currency And Rates

We also have to keep in mind how sensitive the dollar remains to what’s happening underneath, particularly if incoming data suddenly skews soft. In that case, the dollar could be under renewed pressure not from external trade fears, but from rate cuts being brought forward again. That’s a real risk.

From our perspective, the shift in forward rates demands closer hedging reviews. Option skew has been stable but any surprise below-target print on inflation, or another break in consumer data, could cause another rethink. At the margin, we lean into flexibility—make room for both scenarios without leaning too heavily on one forecast holding up.

Yields have reset lower near the front end but the move has not yet translated into a strong re-rating of long-dated curves. So, in terms of positioning, we favour low-delta expressions and calendar trades that offer payoff if implied volatility picks up. Structurally, the asymmetry supports layered entries, especially as rate paths slide into a more modest channel.

We continue to monitor short-term interest rate futures, particularly SOFR, which has given up some of its earlier conviction. That in itself suggests confidence is shaky. Until the data tells a different story—or the Fed signals a stronger intent—there’s reason to be measured but not passive.

On balance, the pricing of policy is not alarmist, but the revision has been fast. We’d caution against front-loading expectations again too quickly. Better to lean into what’s actually priced rather than what seems overdue.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Key Technical Insights

The 1.3900 mark remains critical, aligning with the recent consolidation’s neckline. Breaking below this level might bring fresh selling pressure, possibly dragging the pair to April lows near 1.3750.

The 4-hour chart shows recovery as USD/CAD bounced from 1.3905 and rose above the 21-period EMA at 1.3940. The RSI has climbed to 60.10, showing potential for further gains.

Resistance is at 1.4015, the May high. If broken, it could target 1.4070–1.4100. Failure to break 1.4015 may indicate a double-top formation, risking a retest of the 1.3900–1.3910 zone.

The rally occurs on moderate volume, suggesting reactive flows. The pair trades within a rising wedge pattern, which can lead to continuation or reversal. The 1.3900–1.3930 area acts as support, needed to maintain a bullish view.

Upcoming Data Releases

Upcoming US Producer Price Index (PPI), Retail Sales, and Canadian Housing data on Thursday could impact the pair’s movement.

This week, USD/CAD has found a foothold near 1.3900 and managed to stage a bounce in the US session, trading around 1.3975. Buyers appear to be probing higher ground as they test resistance near the 50-day Exponential Moving Average around 1.4030. It’s a level that often invites selling pressure, but should gains lead to a solid daily close above this mark, the path may open back up toward 1.4150 and beyond to 1.4290.

Earlier in the week, the pair settled above the 21-day EMA near 1.3920—an encouraging signal for directional bias, particularly when supported by improving momentum readings. The daily Relative Strength Index now sits at 52, a neutral but upward-leaning level, not quite in overbought territory but leaning towards demand-side strength. Often, these levels suggest complacency among sellers while buyers begin to regroup.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Immediate Downside Targets

Immediate downside targets include the 1.1145 support, with a weekly low around 1.10648. These levels may attract further selling pressure if the current trend continues. For upward momentum, EURUSD would need to break above 1.1213 and maintain its position above the 200-hour MA at 1.12578.

Key technical levels are as follows: resistance at 1.1213, 200-hour MA at 1.12578, and the swing area of 1.12657–1.1275. Support levels are 1.1193–1.1213 (swing zone), 1.11876 (100-hour MA), 1.1145, and 1.10648.

The Bearish Outlook

The bearish outlook remains while the price is below 1.1213, with an increase under 1.11876 solidifying this stance. Watch for movement below these supports to confirm a continuation of the bearish trend.

What’s outlined above is a straightforward dissection of where the EURUSD has recently bounced and stalled. Sellers saw an opportunity as the pair approached an overhead cluster of resistance—composed of the 200-hour moving average and a historical band extending just beyond 1.1265—and wasted little time in taking control, rejecting higher prices. That shift in tone has turned attention back to one of the more frequently tested areas so far this year: the swing region just under 1.1220.

We’ve seen this range—roughly between 1.1193 and 1.1213—act not only as resistance in past months but also as a pivot where short-term sentiment tends to shift. When the market trades within this zone, small breaks often lead to rapid tests of the next technical markers. So, it becomes more than just a line on a chart; it’s a working guide to the mood of the trade.

At the moment, eyes are fixed on whether price will sustain itself above that band or, instead, slide past the 100-hour moving average, which currently lies near 1.1188. If that break occurs with follow-through—by which we mean not just a quick dip but a close below that level on an hourly or four-hour chart—that’s our signal that momentum may be firmly with sellers again. That opens the door to 1.1145, which isn’t just a round number but also one that markets have previously hesitated at.

We’re not aiming for generalities here. If price dives below 1.1145, we don’t have to look far for the next chart-based support—it rests down near this week’s low at 1.10648. Any flirtation with that zone will likely force many to reassess whatever bullish exposure they’ve held until now.

To undo this bearish tone, we’d need to see candle closes secure themselves above 1.1213 at a minimum, followed by strong hourly structure building above the 200-hour line near 1.1258. Without that, upside will continue looking limited and prone to fadeouts whenever price nears the 1.1265–1.1275 area, which has already proven resilient.

What this tells us is that short-term expectations should be shaped by the patterns of rejection already seen. Repeated failures to sustain gains above clearly marked zones tend to attract more participation from directional traders who use those signals as confirmation. If downward momentum picks up under 1.1188, expect renewed interest in downside plays tied directly to those lower targets discussed.

Volatility around such inflection points isn’t random—it comes from a wide array of positioning being built, then unwound, as one side concedes to the other. If the past few sessions tell us anything, it’s that rallies lacking volume and following through beyond resistance tend to invite decline rather than breakout. That’s the framework on which actions must be decided in the short term.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.