The Closing Figures

The closing figures for the day show the Dow industrial average increased by 271.69 points, marking a 0.65% rise to 42,322.75. Entering the last day of the week, this index had gained 2.60%. The S&P index went up by 24.35 points, or 0.41%, to 5,916.92, with a weekly increase of 4.54%. The NASDAQ index closed at 19,112.32 with a decrease of 34.49 points or 0.18% but remained up by 6.60% for the week.

The initial section outlines a late-session reversal in tech-heavy equities, largely influenced by Meta’s decision to delay its next-generation AI model, known internally as Llama 4 “Behemoth.” This hesitation wasn’t simply product timing—it stemmed from doubts about its relative advantage over the prior instalment. Investors found the move disheartening, and we observed this directly in the stock’s market behaviour: peaking slightly early in the trading session before retreating into the red. Price action was volatile, and that small intraday high proved to be fleeting.

Meta’s fall shaved off momentum from the NASDAQ, which, at one point, was enjoying a reasonably solid intra-day gain. The sharp reversals sent the index into negative territory by session-end. These kinds of moves tend to suggest thin conviction among buyers by the closing bell, and we’ve seen patterns like this before when uncertainties arise about major product pipelines in tech.

Sector Rotation

In contrast, the Dow and S&P pressed ahead. Gains in industrial and broader-market areas suggest rotation—money flowing into what are perceived to be more predictable or steady sectors. Notably, that 4.54% rise in the S&P over just a week hints at underlying strength, likely on the back of improved economic data and calm inflation prints. It’s also instructive that while the NASDAQ slipped on the day, it still completed the week with a gain of more than 6%. That tells us the broader tone remains constructive, but one to monitor closely, given its reliance on a small clutch of tech names.

We should focus now on how price sensitivity behaves across indices over the next few sessions. The NASDAQ’s double-digit weekly gain in percentage terms, followed by its latest pullback, suggests that momentum trades might see a brief pause. That offers both risk and opportunity, depending on timing. The reaction to headline volatility—in this case, coming from large-cap tech—remains exaggerated, an indication that we ought to temper our leverage and scale into directional trades more conservatively when catalysts are in motion.

Broadening spreads in implied volatility tell us there’s still a premium being built into short-term protection. The subtle flattening of some call put skews in tech sectors may not last beyond this week, especially if other FAANG-related names either beat or miss their development cycles.

There’s no need to overcomplicate. Rotation is beginning. It’s clear from how the Dow behaved—positive on the day and firm on the week—that capital is not abandoning markets. Instead, we’re seeing rebalancing, especially among those funds that run sector-model constraints or have exposure guidelines to maintain. That becomes a visible opportunity when beta adds are being capped, particularly on NASDAQ components dependant on innovation cycle timing.

Long gamma remains uncomfortable in this environment unless short-dated, especially when you consider the flattening we saw in the second half of the session. Trading around these conditions requires much tighter delta hedging windows and smaller notional exposures to avoid headline-driven whiplash.

For positioning ahead, trades that rely on direction should be smaller and more reactive. Look toward expiry profiles that sit just beyond earnings or event deadlines, not through them. The forward curve, especially in rates, is behaving in a way that supports defensive exposure, and we may see tech beta reprice mildly downward if similar announcements emerge in the next fortnight.

There’s measurable opportunity tucked inside this market—particularly when volatility inflates without broader market justification. The key is to follow the adjustment: rotation into lower-vol instruments and a tilt toward conservative sector exposure speaks volumes. While option traders may need to keep rolling higher strikes or trimming upside tails, staying nimble in positioning seems a reward-rich approach given how sensitive these names have become to development updates.

Lastly, it’s worth isolating where open interest is building. Flow from newly opened spreads in S&P-linked contracts suggests institutions are stepping back into broad-market participation, albeit cautiously. That makes a strong case for shorter-dated strategies that reflect this cautionary tone but leave room to benefit from a steady hand.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

GBP/JPY is facing downward pressure as renewed demand for the Japanese Yen strengthens the currency. Safe-haven flows are driven by increasing risk aversion due to geopolitical tensions and uncertainty in US–China trade negotiations.

Despite robust UK GDP data showing a 0.7% quarterly growth, the Pound is hindered by the cautious outlook of the Bank of England. UK economic prospects face challenges from high interest rates, global trade issues, and tighter fiscal conditions.

Bank of Japan Policy Shift

Statements from the Bank of Japan suggest a policy shift, supported by rising inflation and a strong Producer Price Index. Japan’s Q1 GDP report could reinforce this shift if it deviates from the projected 0.1% contraction.

Overall, market sentiment remains defensive, favouring the Japanese Yen amid global uncertainties. In the short term, GBP/JPY is unlikely to see a significant shift unless a change in monetary policy or risk sentiment occurs.

GBP/JPY has continued trading with a downward bias, as the Yen finds support from growing investor caution. What we’re seeing here is not simply a preference for the Japanese currency in isolation, but a pattern where risk-off behaviour is becoming more pronounced across markets. Safe-haven buying often increases when there’s a rise in global unease – and with geopolitical strains and fragile dialogue between two of the world’s largest economies, the appetite for safety is firm.

While the UK economy posted quarterly growth that exceeded many forecasts – at 0.7%, it was relatively strong – that by itself hasn’t been enough to lift the Pound. The Bank of England’s tone remains reserved. Despite positive domestic data, there’s a lingering reluctance to hint at shifts away from a high-rate environment. For traders, this caution makes it more difficult to justify long positions in Sterling, especially against currencies like the Yen that are buoyed by the broader move away from risk.

What matters more in the weeks ahead isn’t whether UK data remains strong, but whether policymakers adjust their message. Until there’s clarity or a material change in stance, it’s unlikely that appetite for the Pound will see a forceful return. The Governor and MPC are clearly keeping a close eye on inflation persistence and wage growth, but their concern over stickiness in prices outweighs the upside surprises in output.

Japan’s Economic Outlook

On the other side of the cross, Japan shows early signs of turning a corner on policy. The Producer Price Index, which tracks the prices businesses charge each other, is rising – suggesting underlying inflation may continue. If Japan’s GDP report reveals less weakness than the -0.1% contraction markets have pencilled in, then it further solidifies expectations for higher interest rates somewhere down the line. For Yen bulls, that’s more fuel on the fire.

The broader mood remains cautious, and market positioning is reflecting that. We are seeing flows that tend toward stability, not growth, particularly as political risks globally continue to deepen. In this context, the Yen’s appeal strengthens. For derivatives traders, the message is clear: favour stability over speculation right now. When volatility rises and policymakers stay ambiguous, it’s defensive structures that tend to reward most.

In terms of strategy, it may serve us best to monitor breakouts driven by surprise data. Should Japan’s economy fare better, it reinforces the chance of gradual tightening, and the Yen could gather further strength. That would naturally drag GBP/JPY lower, especially in the absence of a more optimistic shift from Threadneedle Street.

Likewise, in this environment, pricing short-term risk around headline events, such as central bank commentary or flash PMI readings, could offer more practical entry points than chasing directional trades blindly. The most actionable moves are likely to come from macroeconomic surprises, not slow trends.

Momentum is clearly tilted. Until the rate picture changes – or global risks subside – we lean defensive. The price action is telling its own story.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Michael Barr from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors addressed the New York Fed’s Small Business Credit Symposium, acknowledging that while the US economy appears stable, trade strategies from the Trump administration pose challenges.

High tariffs threaten US businesses, especially small ones, with potential risks. There is a concern that if supply chains are disrupted or businesses fail due to rising costs, it could lead to inflation.

Us Economy And Trade Policies

The US economy is currently showing resilience with inflation nearing 2%, but the trade policies have introduced uncertainties. A trade shock could particularly impact small businesses and lead to price hikes if supply chains falter or businesses collapse.

Barr’s comments underline a growing concern around the strain that certain policy shifts could place on smaller firms, particularly due to higher input costs caused by tariffs. From our standpoint, that’s relevant not simply because of the direct pressures on these businesses, but because they often contribute disproportionately to supply chain fluidity and job creation. If enough of them begin to feel the squeeze, we may find disruptions rippling outward.

To translate the implications for derivatives, pricing models may need adjusting if inflation expectations begin to rise again. Although consumer price data has recently moved closer to the 2% mark, that progress could reverse if cost-push inflation takes hold through higher import prices. We’re not just talking about the cost of goods, but also logistics and storage—areas that have tighter capacity, which derivatives contracts already factor into.

Those engaged in rate-sensitive strategies should be aware: even in the absence of headline CPI acceleration, the Federal Reserve may hold rates higher for longer if it suspects upcoming price pressure from trade frictions. Barr’s remarks, cautious as they may seem, point to a Fed keeping one eye on policy spillovers. Accordingly, curve plays that are predicated on imminent cuts may need rebalancing if consensus timing shifts.

Market Adjustments And Risk Parameters

What’s more, spreads across different durations could readjust if there’s an increased divergence between near-term inflation resilience and mid-term risk. This isn’t about panic positioning—but rather minor, sensible recalibrations. The recent stability in core inflation won’t necessarily stop TIPS breakevens from widening if input costs surge. That’s another variable our models are nudging us to monitor more closely.

Furthermore, high tariffs could dampen business investment. That, in turn, may affect growth expectations priced into equity index derivatives, particularly in small-cap sectors. These companies hold less bargaining power internationally and may have tighter profit margins exposed to commodity swings. If futures and options are tied too closely to forecasts ignoring such microeconomic stress points, traders could find themselves behind the move.

Given this, we’re adjusting our risk parameters modestly for positions tied to global trade exposure. While it’s not yet a hard tilt, the carry cost of ignoring this risk has begun nudging some implied volatilities higher on longer-dated contracts related to industrials and transport. That shift isn’t linear, but once liquidity moves behind these assumptions, repricing can be more abrupt than expected.

Barr isn’t positioning this messaging as a forecast, but as a caution. That hasn’t gone unnoticed by markets.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The price of crude oil fell by $1.53 or 2.42%, closing at $61.62. Factors influencing the decline include the potential U.S.–Iran nuclear agreement, which may lift sanctions on Iranian oil, increasing global supply.

OPEC+ is set to raise production by 411,000 barrels per day as they continue easing previous cuts. The IEA predicts a decrease in global demand growth from 0.99M bpd in the first quarter to 0.65M bpd for the remainder of 2025. Additionally, they have revised the 2025 global supply growth forecast to 1.6M bpd from an earlier 1.2M bpd estimate. Economic factors such as tariff tensions and slowing growth worldwide are also affecting oil demand.

Oil Price Movements

Technically, oil prices dipped to test the 200-hour moving average at session lows but did not maintain the drop. Prices are now below the 100 and 200-hour moving averages. The 100-hour moving average stands at $62.12 and the 200-hour at $60.41, which will indicate potential for bullish or bearish trends depending on further movements.

With a $1.53 drop in crude, a decline of 2.42%, settling near $61.62, we’re observing market reactions sharpen in response to potential macro-level developments. The ongoing discussions around the U.S.–Iran nuclear accord, if successful, could reintroduce millions of barrels to the daily output. Traders have started pricing this into short-term expectations well before any formal agreements are signed. It’s less about anticipation, more about hedging against risk exposure linked to a possible oversupplied market.

The alliance, which has already been easing cuts gradually, appears committed to a steady increase—adding 411,000 barrels per day. This adjustment, though broadly expected, feeds into a market already wrestling with weaker demand projections. According to a fresh revision by the global energy watchdog, demand growth, initially forecast at 0.99 million barrels per day for early 2025, has now been lowered to 0.65 million for the rest of the year. Supply expectations, on the other hand, have gone in the opposite direction, bumped higher from 1.2 to 1.6 million. So we’re looking at a widening gap, something that doesn’t usually offer a supportive environment for a rally.

When we zoom in on price action, we can see where sentiment is shifting. Prices briefly dropped to the 200-hour moving average but were unable to stay there, suggesting buyers emerged around that zone. However, the fact that both the 100-hour and 200-hour moving averages are overhead now—$62.12 and $60.41, respectively—creates a type of squeeze. It’s exactly the sort of setup where conviction matters; either buyers start pushing prices back above those areas or sellers will find confidence in pressing further.

From a trading perspective, moving average levels tend to act like momentum thresholds. If prices manage to close above them convincingly, we might assume the pullback was temporary. If not, and especially if volume increases on another leg lower, the market may try revisiting prior support zones—more so when supply news continues to weigh.

Globally, the presence of trade hurdles and softer economic performance in some major regions is dragging expectations. That’s creating shorter-term hesitations in positioning. These aren’t temporary hurdles; weaker consumer demand, lagging industrial activity, and cautious inventory behaviour add up rather quickly. With that, it’s no stretch to say that oil markets are now being shaped more by what’s happening off the charts than on them.

Volatility And Trade Strategy

We’re also watching volatility metrics, which have started to widen modestly, showing clearer directional uncertainty than in recent weeks. This doesn’t favour momentum chasers, but it does keep short-dated options volumes active. Those of us with positions tied directly to spreads ought to reassess exposure and expiry impacts. With implied demand weakness creeping into forward curves, calendar spreads may do more heavy lifting than outright direction.

As prices hesitate at key technical points and the macro backdrop grows heavier, trade selection becomes sharper. Those watching delta or theta sensitivity will want to avoid setups that lean entirely on upward rebounds without some measure of support in underlying figures. Rapid shifts in supply acceptance may not come with warning—when barrels do return to market, it’s often in blocks and not streams.

Patience becomes practical. A market that absorbs bad news slowly often trades sideways longer than it deserves. In that space, turning points emerge less through headlines and more through inconsistencies—an inventory draw that shouldn’t have happened, or a refinery run that crept higher when analysts forecast a fall.

It’s that kind of attention to detail that can separate rushed entries from sustainable setups.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

WTI crude is trading near $61.20 after a decline driven by rising US stockpiles and potential developments in the US-Iran nuclear deal. WTI saw an over 3% drop earlier, stabilising at $60.00, unable to recover beyond the 21-day EMA.

Bearish supply-side fundamentals and resistance levels contribute to the downward trajectory. Renewed hopes for an easing of sanctions on Iran could see increased oil supply, influencing global supply concerns and pricing.

Us Inventory Reports

US inventory reports have furthered this downward pressure. The EIA recorded a 3.5 million-barrel stockpile increase, counter to a forecasted 1.1 million-barrel draw, with the API noting a 4.3 million-barrel rise.

OPEC has adjusted its 2025 supply growth forecast from US and non-OPEC producers to 800,000 bpd, down from 900,000. Despite this, OPEC’s gradual output rise impacts price sentiment.

Technically, WTI faces range limits between $55.50 and $64.00, with recent attempts to breach $64.00 unsuccessful. Immediate support rests at $60.00, with a potential downside extending to $52.00 if breached.

Rally Requirements

A rally requires reclaiming the 21-day EMA, potentially testing $64.00 again. Sustaining this could unlock further gains toward $66.80.

Currently, West Texas Intermediate crude floats close to $61.20 per barrel, marking a modest pause after a sharp drop earlier in the week. This decline, over 3% earlier on, was largely provoked by a pair of compounding factors: rising U.S. oil inventories and the prospects tied to restored diplomatic dealings between Washington and Tehran. Crude momentarily steadied at $60.00, but efforts to regain upward traction faltered below the 21-day exponential moving average, a commonly watched metric signalling short-term momentum.

The inventory figures alone have drawn a fresh wave of scepticism towards any immediate recovery. Expectations had pointed to a drawdown of around 1.1 million barrels, but instead, the Energy Information Administration logged a jump of 3.5 million barrels. Tuesday’s report from the American Petroleum Institute reinforced the same tension, with a more substantial 4.3 million-barrel increase. In a period where fuel demand is not yet running hot, excess supply—whether realised or anticipated—is a drag on pricing strength.

From a medium-term perspective, the suggestion of potential sanction relief on Iran could open the gates for additional oil to hit the global market. Though indirect and still speculative, that kind of shift tends to loom large in weighing on speculative positioning.

Meanwhile, fresh projections from OPEC placed non-OPEC and U.S. supply growth next year at 800,000 barrels per day, a notch lower than their prior forecast of 900,000. Still, OPEC’s readiness to raise output in increments, although measured, is likely factored into traders’ outlook. It adds weight to the existing bearish tone, especially where demand remains uneven across key consuming regions.

Price-wise, WTI continues to oscillate within a defined corridor, largely trapped between $55.50 at the lower end and $64.00 at the top. Most recently, bulls struggled to push above that upper barrier, reinforcing this month’s trading limits. Immediate support can still be found at $60.00, with sharper declines possible if that level collapses—markets may then begin eyeing $52.00 as the next anchor.

To challenge the downtrend, futures would need to vault back above the 21-day EMA convincingly. If that occurs, the door nudges open for another retest of $64.00. Passing that ceiling, we’d look closely at $66.80, which previously acted as a distributive area. However, any bounce would require either a tightening of supply forecasts or a decisive shift in macro risk tone.

The coming sessions should offer more clarity as we digest inventory data, monitor the trajectory of nuclear diplomacy, and assess refining margins heading into peak seasonal demand. As always, it helps to stay nimble and protect capital in either direction.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Michael Barr indicated that the economy is currently stable. However, trade shocks could affect small businesses and lead to price increases if supply chains are disrupted or firms collapse.

Recent Producer Price Index data has influenced market expectations. There is now full anticipation of a 25 basis point interest rate increase in September.

Economic Indicators and Trade Shocks

What Barr effectively outlined was a fragile equilibrium—while the broader economy appears steady for now, it’s being quietly shaped by factors that could shift rapidly. His mention of trade shocks points directly to vulnerabilities that, if triggered, may ripple through smaller firms first. This could result in squeezes on inventory and disruptions in product movement. Practically, that means higher costs pushed onto consumers, and a strain on margins for businesses operating on tighter budgets. It’s easy to focus on headline stability, but under the surface, things are less quiet.

The latest Producer Price Index (PPI) data pushed expectations in one direction. The market has moved decisively, now fully pricing in a 25 basis point hike in September. That type of move spotlights the growing confidence among traders regarding the central bank’s tightening cycle. It’s not speculative anymore; it’s priced in as a near-certainty.

For those of us positioned in derivatives, the message here is less about the hike itself and more about the growing alignment between data and monetary reaction. When expectations tighten around a known outcome, price swings tend to become more sensitive to new variables. Volatility may compress in the short term, but surprise data or disruptions could provoke sharper reactions than we’ve seen recently.

Impact of Monetary Policies

With the rate hike expectation solidified, attention should shift to the post-September trajectory. If input costs continue edging upward, even slowly, that could extend the tightening path into the early part of next year. That’s worth watching, particularly for anyone holding positions sensitive to forward guidance.

In the meantime, the role of midsize businesses in the broader rate transmission mechanism shouldn’t be overlooked. These firms tend to react faster to changing risk conditions, especially when credit access becomes more restrictive. If lending tightens indirectly due to higher policy rates, those reactions can emerge quickly. We’d be looking at regional lending conditions and demand-side data for real clues here—less about headlines, more about how capital is flowing.

Jones, for instance, warned that the monetary policy effect might lag but arrives forcefully, often when confidence begins to decay rather than in the early stages of tightening. That historical pattern hasn’t shifted much. Traders familiar with prior cycles might recall the risk of underestimating lags—especially if they’ve built positions around quicker feedback loops.

Now that PPI and rate forecasts are aligned, implied volatility may remain relatively tame—until new shocks come into play. Any fresh disruptions, even those perceived as isolated, could break the present calm. That’s not alarmism, just pattern consistency.

From our perspective, risk modelling now benefits more from disaggregation—not just looking at aggregates like core inflation, but watching structural variables such as trucking loads, supplier payments, or short-term credit spreads. These show movement long before the major indicators respond. It aids in getting ahead without relying solely on lagging macro averages.

What we’ve got now is not an all-clear signal. It’s an expectation moulded by recent, clearer indicators. And it gives us a narrow window to prepare for moves that don’t yet sit on anyone’s calendar.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Technical Analysis Of The US Dollar Index

The US Dollar Index shows indecision, trading between 100.59 and 101.05. Indicators like RSI and MACD suggest mild buy momentum, but the broader outlook is bearish. Key support levels are at 100.62, 100.59, and 100.56, while resistance is seen at 100.92, 101.34, and 101.81. A breakout above 101.90 or below 100.22 could indicate the next directional move.

The USD is the world’s most traded currency, accounting for over 88% of global foreign exchange turnover, averaging $6.6 trillion in transactions per day as of 2022. The Federal Reserve’s monetary policy, including interest rate adjustments, significantly impacts the USD’s value.

The current reading on the US Dollar Index (DXY), hovering just below 101.00, reflects a subdued mood in the currency markets. Looking at the latest economic figures, we saw retail sales barely advanced, with an increase of only 0.1% in April — underwhelming at best when considering recent seasonal trends. In parallel, the Producer Price Index slowed to 2.4% annually, which was weaker than markets had anticipated. Unemployment claims held steady, staying close to 229,000, and only a slight tick-up in continued claims was observed.

Powell addressed the public with some revised messaging, hinting at shifts in the Federal Reserve’s communication around inflation and the employment picture. However, his remarks failed to stir the markets in any measurable way. What appears to be commanding more attention are the growing murmurs of possible currency interventions in Asia, alongside geopolitical concerns — specifically, the apparent deadlock in negotiations between Russia and Ukraine. In response, the DXY drifted slightly lower to 100.80, as markets increasingly price in the likelihood of a rate cut from the Fed later in the year, with many eyeing September as a potential window.

Key Market Observations And Strategies

Looking at the chart patterns, the DXY shows reluctance to commit in either direction. It’s been lingering in a narrow band between 100.59 and 101.05, anchoring sentiment to a wait-and-see mode. Momentum signals are hardly persuasive; the RSI remains neutral-leaning, while MACD reflects the faintest buying tilt — though far from strong enough to suggest a carry-through. Structurally, the prevailing trend remains tilted to the downside. If price action were to press below 100.22, a more defined decline could follow, while a push above 101.90 might flip the tone temporarily more constructive. Until then, we’re boxed in.

Support lines are narrowly packed between 100.62 and 100.56, making this a soft floor that could give way with little provocation. Resistance sits higher at 100.92 and then more meaningfully at 101.81 — a level that has historically seen supply enter. Even small external shocks could tip the balance.

From our view, the conditions suggest that shorter-term directional bets are best approached with caution. Maintain flexible positioning, with attention to geopolitical developments that don’t always reflect directly in economic releases but can redirect flows quite quickly. Rate expectations may continue to oscillate as each data print emerges, but what matters most is how those expectations recalibrate in real time. Reading the bond market’s response might offer earlier clues than traditional macro prints alone.

Volumes remain suppressed during key DXY turning points, another factor that limits conviction in either direction. No need to chase either side aggressively here — waiting for more decisive price action around the edges of the cited range may present clearer setups. That being said, speculative participation could increase if we see a break from this current band, particularly in the event of unexpected policy comments out of the Fed or unexpected developments in Asia.

Downside pressure could accelerate swiftly if triggered by dovish messaging from key policymakers — this has been the pattern in previous such environments — while upside drivers likely require a more hawkish tilt or a sharp deterioration in risk assets. Until then, we’re in for slow structural drift, marked by short bursts of volatility, often disconnected from fundamentals. Be ready for mispriced reactions.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Canada’s S&P TSX index reached a new all-time high at 25,889.46, closing at 25,882.41, up 190 points or 0.74% for the day. Previously, the high was 25,875.61 on 30th January, with another notable point at 25,808.25.

After the January peak, the index dropped by 14.10%, retracing around 50% of the upward movement from October 2023 before rebounding to new highs. The index has increased by 4.69% this trading year, following a rise of 17.99% in 2024.

Us Indices Performance

The US major indices showed gains on the same day. The Dow industrial average rose by 215 points or 0.51%, reaching 42,266.78. The S&P index increased by 28.23 points or 0.48% to 5,921, while the NASDAQ index climbed by 44.47 points or 0.23% to 19,191.71.

In 2025, the Dow and NASDAQ remain negative, but the S&P index shows a positive trend. Year-to-date in 2025, the Dow is down 0.70%, the S&P index is up 0.65%, and the NASDAQ is down 0.63%. For 2024, these indices had impressive increases, with the Dow up 12.88%, S&P up 23.31%, and NASDAQ up 28.64%.

This article tells us that Canada’s primary equity index has managed to set a new peak, edging past its previous record from late January. That previous high had marked a resistance point until now. Following that, markets experienced a pronounced downward correction — specifically, a fall of just over 14%. That sized drop is not unusual and fits cleanly with a technical retracement of the rally that began in October of last year. From that low, prices gradually regained lost ground, eventually pushing beyond January’s top.

So far this year, the index has added just under five percent, which may seem modest compared with the double-digit surge in the previous year, but it suggests that the upward momentum is still persisting, albeit more measured. Typically, after a year of strong performance like 2024, it’s not abnormal for gains to come at a slower pace. The key idea here is that prices are not falling away after touching previous highs — they’re instead building on them.

Market Trends and Volatility

Across our southern border, the major US indices had another day of climbing, with the Dow, S&P and the tech-heavy NASDAQ all closing higher. While Tuesday’s moves were relatively contained, they extended a broader trend of tentative optimism. However, when we glance at the numbers from the start of this year, only one of those indices — the broad-based S&P — is running ahead. This tells us that price action has been very specific and probably driven by selective sector strength, rather than uniform buying across the board.

If we look back at 2024, the growth in US equity benchmarks was far above historical averages, especially in the NASDAQ which had led with gains of nearly 29 percent. When such strong prior-year performances take place, there’s often a digestion period — a sort of pausing — before the next clear leg of movement emerges.

Now, if we step into the position of market participants in derivatives who monitor these patterns and price levels closely, these movements suggest that confidence hasn’t fully left risk assets. What matters here is not just the higher closes, but how calculated and orderly they’ve been. No panic buying, no signs of runaway moves — just steady ticks higher.

With that in mind, given where these indices are now trading relative to their prior peaks and post-correction lows, we’re likely watching for stability in key support zones before establishing any new directional conviction. The reflexive nature of equity indices to reset before embarking on another directional push is something we’ve seen play out over countless quarters.

This also brings attention to how volatility should behave. If realised volatility remains contained, and no spike appears unexpectedly on the horizon, pricing in lower downside premiums might make sense. That is particularly so if we see call spreads begin widening across contracts, which we’re inclined to monitor next.

One cannot ignore the tendency for traders to overreact to modest macro updates during quieter periods — especially in early Q2. So when we price forward volatility or directional bets, it’s worth considering that markets like these, that have managed to scale or hold above previous highs after retracements, are unlikely to break down immediately unless a fresh trigger emerges. Spotting that shift in tone will remain our task going ahead.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The United States 4-week bill auction rate decreased slightly from 4.225% to 4.22%. This event is part of a broader market context involving risks, uncertainties, and potential for substantial financial loss.

The forex market saw mixed movements with AUD/USD dipping under 0.6400. On the other hand, EUR/USD struggled to maintain upward momentum, easing below highs near 1.1570.

Gold Prices Reach New Heights

Gold prices climbed, reaching new daily peaks above $3,200 per ounce. Commodities benefited from a weaker US dollar and cautious global market mood.

Cryptocurrencies experienced a 4% drop, with the market’s value hovering above $3.4 trillion. Notably, altcoins like XRP, Solana, and Cardano underperformed the market average.

The UK economy showed a resurgence in the first quarter, but data reliability remains a question. It followed stagnation in the previous year’s latter half, stirring scepticism with recent figures.

Several brokers for trading EUR/USD and other markets in 2025 offered competitive features. These include low spreads, fast execution, and various platforms suited to different trading needs.

Trading foreign exchange carries high risk, potentially resulting in significant financial loss. Thorough research and independent advice are advised for those considering such market engagements.

With the slight drop in the 4-week U.S. Treasury bill rate from 4.225% to 4.22%, short-term funding has become marginally cheaper, albeit barely. This subtle move reflects changing expectations in money markets, even if real yields remain elevated on a historical basis. It’s telling us that current liquidity requirements are still tight, but not getting worse—for now.

We’re seeing mixed currency flows. The fall in AUD/USD below the 0.6400 handle suggests that commodity-linked currencies continue to feel the weight of weaker macro sentiment. That said, the dip is relatively muted, which implies traders aren’t ready to pile in on the downside just yet. Meanwhile, the euro’s inability to hold near the recent 1.1570 zone against the dollar can’t be ignored. That retreat shows us how fragile bullish attempts in major pairs remain despite some divergence between U.S. and European data.

Metals saw a clear benefit from this hesitancy in the dollar, with gold rallying beyond $3,200 per ounce. This breakout reflects renewed demand for perceived stability in portfolios and possibly quiet accumulation in response to geopolitical noise or fragmented rate expectations. An environment marked by a steadily retreating greenback, combined with low-risk appetite, seems to be lending support here.

On the digital asset front, there was a broad pullback of around 4%, but it’s the underperformance of names like Solana, Cardano, and XRP that stands out. Their lag behind the wider space might be speaking to rotation or perhaps less confidence in use-case tokens for the moment. What’s also important here is the total crypto market cap staying perched above $3.4 trillion—that shows resilience, even if short-term momentum is a worry.

Concerns Over UK Economic Data

Domestically, while GDP in the U.K. ticked higher in the first three months of the year, mounting concerns over the credibility of that data are still circulating. After the flat spell seen at the back end of last year, some are rightly cautious about placing too much weight on initial readings. Revisions have been abrupt in recent quarters, so there’s a need to cross-check sentiment signals elsewhere.

As for euro-dollar trading going forward, brokers are ramping up competition again for flows in 2025. We’ve seen the push for tight spreads and prompt execution reassert itself. Traders—ourselves included—should be mindful of what’s behind the “best-in-class” claims. Often it’s the tech stack or order routing that separates solid offerings from pure marketing.

The mentions of financial loss are far from decorative. High leverage, market dislocations and event risks can swiftly erase capital. When we’re deploying strategies in uncertain environments, the emphasis must remain on position sizing, scenario planning and execution quality. Longer-term success often depends on the choices made during these quieter stretches, rather than chasing short-term noise.

Careful selection and consistency remain our best shields.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The U.S. housing market shows mixed signals with new-home sales improving. In March, new-home sales rose to a seasonally-adjusted annual rate of 724,000 units, a 7.4% increase from February and 6% above last year’s figures. Builders are offering incentives, seen in the 7.5% drop in the median price of new homes to $403,600, while inventory increased to 503,000 units, indicating an 8.3-month supply.

Conversely, the existing-home market remains sluggish. March saw a 5.9% drop in resale transactions, reaching an annual pace of 4.02 million, which is 2.4% lower than last year. High borrowing costs and limited listings contribute to this decline, though tight supply is keeping prices firm. Consequently, the median existing-home price rose to $403,700, 2.7% higher year-on-year and a new record for March.

Financial Conditions Consistency

Financial conditions show some consistency but remain historically high. The latest Freddie Mac survey reports a 30-year fixed mortgage rate of 6.81% for the week ending 15 May, a slight rise from 6.76% the week before. Mortgage rates have stayed between 6.7% and 6.9% for nearly four months, 30 basis points lower than a year ago. This range has restricted refinancing but has increased purchase-application volume by about 18% compared to last year’s low levels.

What we’re seeing here is a tale of two markets within U.S. real estate — one trying to regain its footing through builder-led incentives, the other dragging its heels under the weight of tightening financial restraints. On the one hand, the fresh-home segment is showing clear intent. A sharp rise in sales volumes for March, outpacing both the prior month and the same time last year, offers a measure of momentum. That this is paired with a substantial drop in the typical price of these homes tells us that builders are very aware of buyer hesitation and are adjusting aggressively to address it.

It’s also essential to notice that supply has ticked upwards. An 8.3-month pipeline tells us homes are being completed and listed, not just planned. If that figure had dropped, it might suggest demand heating up more quickly than construction can match. As it stands, sellers are trying to entice cautious buyers, not chase them off.

Contrast that with existing homes, which are not moving nearly as briskly. These owners are holding firm, unwilling or unable to list in an environment where they’d need to trade low mortgage rates for higher ones. The result is tight supply paired with surprising firmness in prices. That’s reflected in a new record high for March, despite fewer total transactions. It’s a classic mismatch: would-be buyers exist, but inventory is trapped.

Impact On Credit Markets

That kind of push-pull dynamic naturally filters into credit markets. We haven’t escaped elevated borrowing costs, though there’s been some stability of late. For nearly four months, mortgage rates have hovered within a narrow band — stubborn, but not rising. That range appears to be just low enough to spark demand from younger borrowers or those previously priced out, though not enough to spur broader refinancing activity.

Here’s what we should focus on: markets are pricing in resilience, not exuberance. There’s no rush to chase yield disproportionately, but no collapse to short indiscriminately either. Builders seem to be managing through the higher-rate environment better than secondary sellers, simply because they can be more flexible on price and perks.

Fixed-income futures are digesting these data points steadily — there’s a method to this drift. Volatility play remains sensitive to rate deviation more than volume upside. Positioning should continue to reflect this: staying light where momentum is soft and balancing corrections off tightening headlines. Supply measures, once overlooked, bear watching now, as any tightening could swing rates expectations swiftly. An upward move in inventory or further builder concessions could lean into duration touches more than net-risk-on sentiment.

Watching the gap between purchasing volume and refinancing remains instructive. If that spread narrows — whether through rate movement or lending standard shifts — we may see feeds into consumer creditworthiness measures, which could percolate through swap valuations nearly as quickly as any CPI read. Stay responsive, especially in the front end. The shape of the curve still signals caution rather than expansion. Let’s treat that not as noise, but as guidance.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.