The Pound Sterling is under pressure against the US Dollar, hovering near 1.3330, with the US Dollar recovering following a stronger-than-expected ISM Services PMI report. As the Federal Reserve is anticipated to keep interest rates constant, the Bank of England is likely to reduce rates by 25 basis points.

The ISM Services PMI for April reached 51.6, surpassing expectations of 50.6 and the previous month’s 50.8. The New Orders Index also showed improvement, growing to 52.3 from the previous 50.4.

Fed Policy Expectations

The Federal Reserve is expected to announce its monetary policy decision, with a steady stance on interest rates anticipated. Ahead, adjustments could be triggered by any cracks in the labour market and broader economic conditions, though recent employment data remains positive.

US inflation expectations and rising input costs are influencing the Fed’s decision on rate adjustments. At the same time, President Trump has urged the Fed to lower rates, citing affordable gas and energy prices among other factors.

Pound Sterling displays mixed performance amidst a holiday in UK markets, with the BoE poised to make a rate decision. The global backdrop is affected by ongoing US-China trade tension, with no short-term resolution in sight.

Sterling continues to tread water, with softness exacerbated by growing divergence in rate trajectories between the UK and the US. Markets have begun to price in a rate cut from the Bank of England, which—if confirmed in the weeks ahead—would only deepen the pressure on GBP, particularly against a firmer Dollar backdrop. This isn’t just a short blip. We see a more prolonged repricing risk, especially as UK economic momentum shows signs of stalling, weighed down by sluggish wage growth and still-persistent inflation uncertainty.

Taking a closer look at the ISM print from the US, it’s not just the headline figure at 51.6 that matters—it’s the internal components that add weight. A steady pickup in New Orders hints at expanding demand, while upward trends in prices paid suggest that cost pressures haven’t yet fully eased. Together, these data points strengthen the Fed’s case for patience. With services activity firming and no clear signs of job market deterioration, there’s very little incentive for the Fed to deliver the cuts that many had priced in earlier this year.

Trump’s recent remarks calling for rate cuts may grab headlines but they lack any tangible influence on current policy direction. The Fed remains committed to a data-driven approach, and the inflation trajectory offers no pressing reason to pivot. If anything, robust services figures and persistent cost growth point in the other direction. And so, Dollar strength is currently rooted in supportive fundamentals—not political appeals.

Uk Economic Outlook

Meanwhile, the UK finds itself in something of a tightening corner. With a muted domestic demand outlook, sluggish industrial production data, and limited fiscal firepower, the BoE’s path appears constrained. Bailey and colleagues may still trim rates this month, especially if they place more weight on flagging retail and contracting small-business sentiment. Market-implied pricing has certainly leaned that way.

As for volatility, it’s likely to rise over the next fortnight. The divergence in rate expectations between the Fed and the BoE is laying the groundwork for broader spreads in interest rate differentials, which can create sharp moves in cable. For those of us trading rate-sensitive instruments or structuring trades that hinge on implied rate paths, it becomes necessary to monitor not only official statements but also the second-tier data releases—especially PMIs and wage trends.

We’ve also seen that geopolitical friction, most notably the unresolved strains in US-China trade tensions, continues to weigh on risk appetite broadly. While not new, this backdrop reinforces the flight-to-quality narrative which keeps the Dollar well-bid during bouts of uncertainty. This leaves Sterling more exposed, as it lacks the balance sheet strength or reserve currency status to attract safe-haven interest.

Positioning data suggests that longer-term speculators have started trimming long positions on GBP, reflecting both rate divergence and a more cautious stance on UK assets. This shift in sentiment could accelerate if market confidence deteriorates further or if forward guidance from the BoE strikes a more dovish tone than currently expected.

In the near term, there’s limited upside for Sterling barring any positive surprise out of the UK labour market or an unexpectedly hawkish tilt from the BoE. For now, the path of least resistance remains biased towards a firmer Dollar and a lower cable, particularly below the 1.3300 threshold—a level that could act more like a magnet if upcoming GDP and CPI figures underwhelm.

We are monitoring cross-asset correlation closely, particularly the behaviour of UK short-term interest rate futures. The flattening observed across the SONIA curve reflects growing conviction in a BoE cut cycle rather than a one-off move. This can influence hedging behaviour, liquidity provisioning, and tactical positioning across derivatives.

It would be prudent to re-evaluate exposure to GBP-denominated rate products over the coming sessions, especially ahead of any surprise inflation revisions or unexpected shifts in fiscal rhetoric. Even moderate changes in expectations here can alter repo dynamics and spill into swap pricing fairly quickly.

As the upcoming BoE decision approaches, markets are sharpening focus on vote splits and forward guidance tone, not just the raw rate adjustment. Divergences between dovish voters and hold-outs offer clues about policy inertia and potential tilt in following meetings.

We lean towards continuing close observation of core inflation metrics, service-sector growth, and any dislocation in liquidity measures—these will offer a cleaner signal on whether the decoupling between UK and US policy stances is growing faster than anticipated.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The USD starts the new trading day on a lower note, with US stocks and yields also decreasing.

For EURUSD, the pair previously held firm above the April 15 low of 1.12657, rebounding from recent declines. Today, the pair is moving towards key moving averages, potentially turning the bias bullish if these levels are surpassed.

Usdjpy And Moving Averages

The USDJPY pair tested the 200-bar moving average on Friday but later rotated lower. Currently, the pair is testing the 100-hour moving average at 143.83. A break below could increase bearish momentum, with focus shifting to the 200-hour moving average at 143.37.

GBPUSD is trading near the day’s high, testing the 100/200-hour moving averages at 1.33249. Surpassing these would suggest a more bullish direction after maintaining above these averages on previous days.

In the stock market, the Dow has decreased by 275 points, while the S&P and NASDAQ are down by 48 and 212 points, respectively.

US debt market yields mostly decrease, with the 2-year yield at 3.795% (-4.5 basis points), 5-year at 3.895% (-3.6 basis points), and 10-year at 4.306% (-1.4 basis points). Only the 30-year yield shows a slight increase, at 4.802% (+0.7 basis points).

Looking At The Euro Rally

With pressure mounting on the Greenback, the tone across the majors hints at a shift that we’ve been anticipating. The drop in US bond yields, particularly at the short end, suggests that market participants are becoming more cautious about the Federal Reserve’s next steps.

Looking at the euro’s rally from the mid-April lows, it’s more than just a relief bounce. Momentum is beginning to build as we trade near key technical zones. Should we breach these averages cleanly, we’ll likely see increased interest from buyers previously sitting on the sidelines. The bullish door swings a tad wider if the next level holds.

The yen’s flirtation with its moving averages tells a story of a pair hesitant to commit. After failing to maintain gains above its longer-term average, it’s drifting towards levels that would typically invite sellers. A confirmed move below the hourly benchmark could encourage sharper downward moves, especially if US yields continue their downward track. That would align with the idea that rate differentials no longer support broad dollar strength.

Sterling’s position is perhaps the most technically clean of the three. Maintaining footing above these moving averages over several days speaks to underlying strength. A close above the current consolidation area would likely draw more upward pressure, especially if risk appetite improves in tandem. The chart shows that buyers have been defending dips with consistency, and that usually builds confidence.

The downward move in US indices—particularly in tech-heavy names—gives the sense that sentiment is shifting. The near 200-point drop in the NASDAQ and softness across the Dow and S&P aren’t noise; they’re signals that traders are beginning to reassess earlier optimism. We’ve noticed that equity weakness often triggers a belt-tightening across all speculative assets, which has knock-on effects in currency risk.

Yields, too, contribute to a clearer picture. The largest drops come from the 2-year and 5-year notes, which tells us that market sentiment is adjusting for a potentially slower pace of Fed action. The long end barely moves, which reinforces the idea that inflation expectations remain anchored. When rate expectations ease but inflation fears don’t spike, it tends to offer support to currencies like the euro and pound, which benefit from carry flows unwinding.

Volatility expectations may rise here, especially in FX options markets. With several pairs nearing important chart points, the next few sessions are going to be key to either confirm the recent turn or invalidate it. Our bias shifts accordingly—longer-duration setups now warrant closer attention, especially following false breaks seen in recent sessions.

It’s not just about directional plays but also timing. As these levels approach, we see value in staggered entries rather than chasing momentum. Patience may pay higher dividends, particularly given how US equity softness lines up with a softer dollar tone. Watch options positioning for confirmation—when the flow leans into one direction too heavily, reversals can cut deeply.

We approach this with measured caution. No need to overcommit, but ignoring these price actions would also be an error. Sometimes what isn’t moving is more revealing than what is. We keep the focus methodical, our charts clean, and our timeframes slightly wider than usual.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Gold prices surged over 2% on Monday, reaching $3,317, amid increased geopolitical concerns and speculation around the Federal Reserve’s interest rate decision. Tensions in the Middle East, coupled with remarks from Donald Trump about military action concerning Greenland, have contributed to this rise as the demand for safe-haven assets grows.

The Federal Reserve’s upcoming rate decision is also influencing gold’s appeal. Recent economic indicators, including Nonfarm Payrolls and performance in manufacturing and services sectors, suggest the US economy is easing rather than crashing, maintaining the likelihood of steady rates until a comfortable level of economic stability is achieved.

Currency Market Movements

In the currency market, the Taiwan Dollar experienced a 5% surge against the US Dollar, after the Taiwan central bank’s intervention to discourage exporters from selling their Dollar holdings. Meanwhile, Gold Road Resources is set for a $3.7 billion acquisition by Gold Fields.

Technical analysis shows gold breaking past the resistance at $3,265 with further resistance expected at $3,320. Support levels are identified at $3,244 and $3,245, with potential drops possibly reaching $3,197. Central banks tweak interest rates to maintain economic stability, with interest rate decisions being made by an independent policy board.

That sharp jump in gold—over 2%, lifting it to $3,317—came off the back of growing unrest abroad and fresh speculation that US policymakers may not pivot on interest rates just yet. Military-related rhetoric from Trump about Greenland, in tandem with actual hot spots in the Middle East, triggered another wave of safe-haven flows. That’s not surprising; gold thrives during such periods, since it’s traditionally where capital seeks shelter when broader confidence wavers. What we’re witnessing is less about panic and more about prudent reallocation.

Monetary Policy and Currency Movements

On monetary policy, the Fed remains content watching recent softening in economic indicators—not enough deterioration to force their hand on rate cuts, but also not a full-throttle expansion that would demand tightening. Recent reads on employment and services suggest a slow fade rather than a sharp downturn. No need to price in any aggressive moves in the immediate term. That makes it fairly clear: rate stability, barring any fresh surprises.

Currency movements added another layer. The Taiwanese Dollar’s 5% move higher wasn’t natural drift but engineered buying, with the central bank stepping in to limit the amount of US Dollars held by exporters. By doing so, they attempted to balance export competitiveness against domestic price pressures—though the force of that shift caught more than a few short positions off-guard, creating ripples into broader Asia-Pacific currency markets.

Meanwhile, we’ve seen sector consolidation with Gold Road Resources now lined up for a multibillion-dollar acquisition. The tie-up with Gold Fields has less to do with near-term gold price action and more with securing long-life production assets. That said, when long-term production and funding align, it tends to reflect deeper belief in firm medium-term demand.

Price levels are behaving as expected, according to classic breakout logic. Once $3,265 gave way, buyers accelerated the move until it tapped resistance around $3,320, which may eventually act as a psychological barrier, at least until a fresh round of macro inputs emerges. Should momentum fade, we’re watching $3,245 as a near-term cushion. A deeper drop toward $3,197 could play out if broader markets recover risk appetite suddenly. For now, the pattern remains upward with controlled pullbacks.

From our vantage, it’s not just about direction—it’s about tempo. With central banks still aiming to offset inflationary stickiness without overcorrecting, rate decisions continue to be finely balanced. The commentary from policymakers has shown a noticeable preference for data confirmation rather than preemptive action, and that influences not only how gold behaves, but also derivative positions sensitive to Treasury yields.

Short-term volatility remains tethered to external shocks, not internal fragility. This sets a certain tempo for structuring options and futures strategies around major events—something to keep in mind if your timelines stretch past month-end expiries. With current resistance in sight and no fresh support being tested yet, spread positioning has less room for error. Risk needs to be boxed in, not left to run.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Market dynamics are primarily influenced by expectations. Asset prices adjust as the market reevaluates future expectations, creating trading opportunities whenever predictions are inaccurate.

When conditions shift, the market alters its expectations, which then impact asset prices. Current market conditions have already been considered in existing prices, so trading should be based on future changes.

Importance Of Understanding Market Expectations

Understanding market expectations is essential for trading. This knowledge allows one to identify changes, capitalise financially, and avoid investing in already priced-in conditions, thus protecting capital.

In April, the market expected 50% tariffs for China and 10% for other nations. Higher announced tariffs led the market to anticipate retaliation, economic slowdown, and recession risks.

By April 9, expectations shifted again following negotiations, causing the market to de-escalate concerns and reduce anticipated negative outcomes. Economic data were disregarded as they were outdated and lacked impact on changing expectations.

Recognising what’s priced in lets traders focus on developments that could modify expectations. These adjustments drive market prices, presenting profitable opportunities for those aware of these shifts.

What we’ve been witnessing is a textbook response to the way forward-looking markets behave. Prices don’t merely respond to what is happening right now—they adjust in real time to reflect what people think will happen next. That means, when projections are wrong, markets get jolted, and in that dislocation lies our entry point. Derivatives traders, who are by nature dealing in the future rather than the present, have a unique advantage in this regard.

The landscape earlier in the spring was shaped by predictions of elevated tariff levels against major trading partners. The assumption, at the time, was that these would trigger not only commercial pushback but also broader risks to global trade flows and domestic economic strength. Those fears found their way into volatility markets, futures curves, and pricing on cyclical stocks. Hedging activity surged in related sectors, reflecting a shared concern of downside risk.

Then came negotiations again, which softened the tone. As the talks progressed, urgency diminished and traders began adjusting accordingly. The speed of this turnaround was a reminder to stay agile. Figures from the economy released while this shift was happening were set aside. It wasn’t that they weren’t accurate—they simply didn’t move the needle because the narrative had already leapt forward.

Capitalising On Market Surprises

So now, rather than placing too much weight on outdated figures, we have to be attentive to what might genuinely change the view going forward. Watching what modifies sentiment—not reinforcing what’s already assumed—is far more effective. That might mean paying attention to previously marginal events, such as second-tier diplomatic gestures, or rising input costs feeding into supply chains, all of which are capable of moving market thinking.

Focus must remain on surprise. For example, a sudden policy change or an unexpected election result can swiftly reverse recent positioning. It doesn’t need to be monumental—merely unexpected. That’s the element priced scenarios miss, and it’s where short-term derivatives gain their edge.

We have learned that markets absorb known information quickly. Patterns in rates markets or drives in option premiums often scream what the consensus is. But those who wait for data to confirm an idea will already be late. It’s movement at the margin—where expectations budge slightly from the current consensus—that tends to affect price most directly and reward those on the right side of the shift.

The gap between perception and reality often narrows quickly once new information emerges, so anticipating where that gap might open again is key. Quiet periods preceding announcements often allow complacency to build. But when contrarian hints begin to flicker—perhaps inside more granular survey measures or commodity moves that don’t match the prevailing view—this is where we should lean in.

Short-dated derivatives may be particularly useful tools now. Their sensitivity to sudden changes in outlook, rather than longer-term trends, means they offer sharper positioning in uncertain periods. The challenge is not predicting future headlines, but spotting what others have missed or dismissed too easily.

Pricing tells us what everyone knows. Risk lies in what no-one expects. Watching for pivotal announcements, subtle tone shifts from institutions, or cracks in seemingly unified policies could offer that missing piece which pushes the market in a new direction. And when that happens, we don’t respond with hesitation—we act.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Trade Negotiations And Market Implications

Markets and trading instruments discussed should be considered informational and not as trading recommendations. Thorough research is advised before making investment decisions, with associated risks falling on potential investors. This information may contain errors or be out of date, with investing involving potential loss of investment.

The author’s views do not reflect any official policy or advertiser positions, and no business relationships exist with mentioned companies. Neither the author nor the platform provides personalised advice, and they are not liable for inaccuracies or associated losses. The author is not a registered investment advisor, and this article is not investment advice.

With last week closing in the red for GBP/USD, the pair softened slightly—about 0.3%—bringing an end to a brief three-week stretch of gains. For much of the week, it floated in a muted holding pattern under the 1.3300 threshold, showing little appetite to retest previous highs. That stalling behaviour signals hesitation, perhaps a lack of conviction from either side of the market as participants awaited fresh guidance.

By Friday, despite a relatively muted close, attention shifted towards the US jobs report. The April Nonfarm Payrolls figure came in at 177,000, which, while positive, underwhelmed consensus estimates. That mild disappointment prevented the Dollar from extending its short-term strength that had been powered by easing concerns over trade disagreements with China. Broadly speaking, employment data still supports a solid US economy, albeit one no longer roaring ahead at the same pace as earlier months.

Amid this background, the greenback posted its third consecutive weekly gain, stretching a rally that’s been driven more by relative macro strength than domestic momentum alone. Statements from Trump earlier in the week added to that buoyancy. His remarks alluded to progress in trade talks not just with China, but also Japan, India, and South Korea—all of which signal possible long-term shifts in global commerce. This tone, broadly interpreted as pro-growth, has seen investors edge cautiously into Dollar longs, particularly in interest rate-sensitive instruments.

Sterling Sentiment And Future Outlook

Sterling’s hesitation may also reflect caution ahead of incoming macro prints and potential revisions in UK growth expectations. The pair’s behaviour—consolidating narrowly below a key barrier—tends to point towards a market waiting for a firmer catalyst before committing to a well-defined direction. We saw subdued volatility and low participation last week, but that shouldn’t be confused for apathy—rather, it’s a pause.

Volatility desks have already marked short-dated options pricing as moderately skewed, leaning slightly in favour of GBP downside. That’s no surprise given how little directional confirmation we’ve witnessed. As clarity emerges from upcoming central bank communications and UK data this month, those skew levels should adjust accordingly. For us, the lack of follow-through after Friday’s US jobs data hints that the greenback might struggle to maintain momentum without fresh policy speculation.

What matters now is how participants position into the next swathe of economic data. The technical structure still suggests resistance holding above 1.3300, with some near-term support clustering around the mid-1.31 region. Unless that top gives way on compelling volume, upside potential looks restrained. Eyes will be on any commentary that sharpens views around rates, particularly from Fed officials. Fed futures continue to lean against additional rate hikes this year, but any divergence there due to inflation stickiness or wage firming could jolt currencies sharply.

On the UK side, short-term rate expectations remain relatively anchored, but inflation stickiness or any hints of revised BoE guidance could shift balance in rate forwards—watch for that to begin showing in three-month implied vols. Rate differentials continue to frame the broader moves, and recalibration from here becomes more sensitive to second-tier data.

We are watching equity coverage closely for signs of broader sentiment shifts. Capital flows into US assets remain robust, but stretched positioning metrics may soon warrant reevaluation. If institutional buyers start hedging exposure, or if leveraged strategies unwind, that could throw Dollar short-term positioning out of sync.

Plainly, it’s not the time for complacency. Models remain delicately balanced, and any reprice in expectations—whether around growth, trade, or policy—could bring about fast adjustments.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Gold prices increased by 2% at the start of the week, climbing back above the $3,300 mark. Last week’s decline was halted by the 50.0 Fibonacci retracement level, allowing for a recovery.

The current price surge has surpassed the 100 and 200-hour moving averages at $3,270 and $3,294, respectively. This has shifted the short-term outlook to a more bullish stance.

Ongoing Factors In Gold’s Rise

Ongoing factors that contributed to gold’s rise in March and April continue to affect the market. Unresolved issues between the US and China persist, with uncertainty surrounding tariff plans.

Optimism exists about reducing tariff levels to 50% or 60%. However, questions remain about the permanence of tariffs. This ongoing situation may result in long-term negative impacts, which broader markets have yet to fully assess.

What we’ve seen so far is a clear rebound in gold’s near-term trend, underpinned by technical factors and external developments. Prices bouncing at a textbook Fibonacci level shows that buyers stepped in as expected, possibly layering in long positions after last week’s selling found a natural floor. The move through both the 100-hour and 200-hour moving averages signals momentum shifting back toward the upside, especially for timeframes aligning with intraday or short-dated contracts.

Sustained Uncertainty In The Market

Importantly, it’s the sustained uncertainty driving this—not a momentary headline. Tariff negotiations remain unresolved, and although some soft expectations for scaled-back measures are circulating, they aren’t delivering clarity on long-term trade rules. That is key. When policies look temporary, they distort hedging strategies and skew risk pricing—including in sectors not immediately touched by metals.

Short-dated options volumes have seen mild increases, reflecting that some expect more movement. With gold slipping back into its tighter spreads during April, demand for protection on either side—be it through straddles or directional plays—could grow. Price action moving above previous average levels opens the case for bullish bias in price-setting models.

We should also mention that broader equity markets seem to be absorbing too little of the structural risks involved. Earlier expectations for a de-escalation in tariffs have been slowly unwinding, but pricing in gold appears to have picked up that slack more faithfully. That disparity could support further bids, especially if inflation-linked metrics start ticking upwards again.

Stress indicators across Asian exchanges haven’t spiked, but we can’t rule out latent reactions to restrictive trade flows resurfacing in the coming sessions. Slowdowns in goods movement—perceived or otherwise—have historically aligned with increased demand for havens. There’s also no fresh suggestion that central banks will shift their aggregate demand for bullion.

Any upward movement near this threshold may attract some unwinding of short gamma exposure. That could lead to steeper late-day accelerations if levels near $3,320 are tested again. Seasonally, May tends to bring flatter curves, but geopolitical themes often disrupt that pattern.

Volatility projections from implied measures have stayed subdued, which doesn’t quite match the underlying uncertainty. That could make tail protection slightly underpriced at the moment. We’re seeing strategies priced as if the worst risks are temporary rather than structural.

If prices close the week near these thresholds, there’s no compelling reason to expect buyers to exit abruptly. Medium-dated contracts, particularly with interest rate pressuring less aggressively than in Q1, might continue to draw long-side bias. We need to watch resistance bands around $3,325—if breached, momentum models may kick into tighter bands with more responsive delta hedging.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Oil prices are under pressure as OPEC+ plans to accelerate the unwinding of 2.2 million bpd output cuts, with plans to increase production by 960,000 bpd from June. The tension between the US and China has contributed to concerns over reduced oil demand.

West Texas Intermediate (WTI) futures have rebounded slightly from a low of $55.14 to $57.30. Despite this, WTI remains nearly 1.5% below last Friday’s closing price.

Opec+ Output Increases

OPEC+ intends to gradually increase oil output by 138,000 bpd each month from April until reaching the 2.2 million bpd cut by September 2026. In May, the growth rate increased to 411,000 bpd, set to rise to 960,000 bpd in June.

Uncertainty in oil demand grows with US President Trump’s recent tariffs announcements. Hopes for bilateral trade deals exist, but the US-China tensions persist.

China’s GDP forecasts have been revised amid the trade conflict. China, as the world’s largest oil importer, faces a slowdown, affecting global oil demand.

WTI, a type of light, sweet crude oil, is a key benchmark in the oil market. It reflects global economic activity and is affected by supply, demand, and geopolitical factors.

Overall, what we’re observing in oil markets right now reflects the direct impact of both supply-side changes and renewed concerns over global economic health. With the planned easing of OPEC+ output cuts, there’s a notable shift in the near-term production outlook. The decision to move forward with a sharper production ramp-up — reaching a projected 960,000 barrels per day in June — has already sent ripples through the futures markets. Brent and WTI reacted as expected, with volatility picking up as traders reassess short and medium-term positioning.

The small rebound in WTI prices after dipping to $55.14, now up to $57.30, may look like a small recovery at first glance. However, with the price still below last week’s closing level, upward momentum hasn’t yet established itself. It’s more corrective than trend setting. What this price action implies is that the earlier drop wasn’t fully priced in or supported fundamentally for a deeper selloff — yet forward uncertainty remains relatively high.

Trade Tensions And Demand Concerns

Much of it hinges on external demand conditions. Washington’s moves — particularly the tariffs introduced by Trump’s administration — have dampened enthusiasm over a strong demand recovery. While there’s cautious optimism in some quarters that bilateral negotiations might resume, the rhetoric coming from both capital cities hasn’t loosened perceptions of a prolonged standoff.

Beijing lowering its own growth projections is already casting a shadow across multiple commodities, but oil tends to react more sharply. Considering how much crude China imports annually, any cooling off in its industrial output or broader consumption manifests directly in the futures curve. We’ve already started seeing this in widening contango structures for some delivery points.

In derivative terms, the implied volatility is still modest relative to historical extremes, but directional bias has turned slightly bearish on short-dated contracts, especially for WTI. Open interest movements suggest there’s fresh positioning into calendar spreads, focussing on the widening divergence between short and long-term contracts. Activity within June and July contracts has shown more aggressive sell-side flows in recent sessions.

From our perspective, the most sensible course of action in the weeks ahead is to monitor pace and consistency of updates to OPEC+ guidance. While the scheduled production increases are already laid out, it’s not unusual for these policies to be adjusted quickly in response to price swings or shifting demand forecasts. Any deviation from the current path would likely introduce fresh volatility.

Keep an eye on Chinese import data when it’s released — particularly storage levels and refining margins. Those will likely give early clues if physical demand is indeed matching recent government forecasts. If stock levels continue to creep up while refinery utilisation moderates, that could further pressure front-month contracts.

Watching U.S. crude stockpile levels will also help confirm if slack demand abroad is reflecting in domestic inventory buildup. We’re anticipating at least moderate fluctuation in DOE figures over the next few weekly releases, particularly in Cushing.

The pricing power moving forward rests not only within geopolitical headlines and OPEC compliance but also with downstream indicators. If margin pressure mounts in Asian or European refining, a chain reaction could return selling pressure back to futures — particularly those linked to cracking yields.

Continue to monitor the dollar index in parallel. Recent strength in USD has provided an additional headwind to crude, particularly as contracts become more expensive abroad. If FX markets remain tight and dollar liquidity continues tightening, it could reinforce commodity weakness for non-U.S. buyers — creating another feedback loop into oil futures.

In adjusting exposures, flexibility remains key. Tail hedges through out-of-the-money puts in deferred months provide reasonable downside coverage with relatively low premiums right now. Spreads may need modifying if contango deepens further into late Q3.

Time spreads between July and September remain of interest. Dislocations may widen, and arbitrage opportunities could present themselves should shipping constraints or storage bottlenecks emerge. We’ll re-evaluate as fresh allocation reports become available.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Silver (XAG/USD) climbed to $32.40 per troy ounce on Monday, a rise of 1.19% from $32.02 last Friday. Since the year’s start, silver prices have risen by 12.12%.

Key factors influence silver prices, including geopolitical instability and recession fears, which can drive prices up due to its haven asset status. Silver, as a yieldless asset, rises with lower interest rates, and its price dynamics largely depend on the US Dollar’s behaviour.

Industrial Demand And Economic Developments

Industrial demand, particularly in electronics and solar energy, influences silver prices due to its high electrical conductivity. Economic developments in the US, China, and India can affect price swings, with India’s jewellery demand playing a pivotal role.

Silver generally mirrors gold’s price movements, often rising when gold does due to their comparable haven status. The Gold/Silver ratio, currently at 101.77, can indicate relative valuations between the two, with a high ratio possibly pointing to silver being undervalued compared to gold.

We’ve seen a fairly controlled rally in silver, with spot prices ticking up towards $32.40, building on the 12% gain accumulated since January. That’s not something to shrug off—it’s been a steady climb driven in part by a combination of external risks and monetary leanings from central banks. When interest rates soften or expectations for cuts become more deeply priced in, silver’s relative strength tends to improve. That’s because there’s no yield drag with metals like silver; they don’t pay interest, so they become more appealing when real yields fall or expectations for returns elsewhere diminish.

Unrest or economic soft spots—including those lingering fears of a recession—add to silver’s appeal as capital looks for perceived safety. And while it’s often tied to its yellow counterpart, silver benefits from this dual-role nature: part store-of-value, part industrial input. We can’t ignore its commercial demand, especially from high-efficiency tech sectors. Regions like China and India—whose economies wield pressure on commodity flows—shape the demand curve. In particular, India’s cyclical consumption of silver for ornamentation adds an extra layer of volatility to global prices. A seasonal rise in jewellery buying or a shift in import duties could trigger shallow or deep movements depending on timing.

Looking closer at the Gold/Silver ratio, now slightly above 101, there’s an argument being built: silver might be lagging behind gold in terms of relative performance. Historically, a ratio above 80 is considered stretched. When it pushes beyond 100, it’s hard to call it balanced. For traders looking at relative plays, that kind of dislocation gets attention. Gold has run higher first—silver may simply be catching up. That ratio, if it narrows, tends to close via silver rallying faster rather than gold pulling back.

Impact Of The US Dollar And Global Dynamics

From our side, watching how the dollar behaves in the next fortnight remains essential. A strong greenback generally weighs down on commodity prices, but silver has occasionally diverged from that correlation this year. Should the Federal Reserve guide towards more dovish messaging or if US inflation shows further signs of moderating, the pressure on the dollar could soften and lend support to silver’s uptrend.

Meanwhile, industrial figures out of China could pose a short-term headwind or tailwind. If stronger factory activity is announced or spending on infrastructure ticks up, silver consumption for solar panels and electronics is likely to benefit. That boost, combined with lower yields, tends to create tighter bid-ask spreads across forward contracts.

We wouldn’t neglect implied volatility, either. If VIX counterparts or broader risk measures increase, short-covering in silver derivatives could spike. In recent cycles, silver has proven it can move sharply on thin liquidity—especially when leveraged positions are misaligned with macro direction.

A bump in open interest combined with a jump in trading volumes across longer-dated silver futures could signal re-entry from institutional players. We’re monitoring those figures closely. They’ll help establish whether current levels are consolidating before another leg upward, or whether we’re nearing a near-term ceiling.

Attention on India’s import policies or China’s PMI data releases over the next two weeks will likely set short-term peaks or base-building ranges. Expect increased noise around those announcements—timing exposure could make all the difference across rolling contracts.

For now, the risk skew still seems to tilt to the upside. But we’re remaining reactive and making position adjustments as the Gold/Silver ratio moderates or interest rate narratives change. Managing exposure in this window will call for sharper adjustments than usual given the compounded layers of demand, supply chains, and monetary expectations now embedded in pricing.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Vietnam’s Prime Minister, Phạm Minh Chính, has revealed that Vietnam and the United States will commence the initial round of tariff negotiations on May 7th. Vietnam is among six nations prioritised by the U.S. for these trade talks, with the others being India, Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, and the UK.

The anticipation surrounding these discussions is high, as stakeholders are keen to understand the potential impact on bilateral trade relations. These negotiations are a step forward in addressing trade issues between the U.S. and the prioritised countries.

Vietnam’s Importance in Trade Negotiations

The announcement by Chính marks an early move in what appears to be a deliberate effort by Vietnam to recalibrate its trade arrangements with the United States. With the first round of talks beginning on May 7th, there’s no ambiguity: both sides are now engaging at the negotiation table, and tariffs are the centrepiece of these discussions. Among the selected nations, Vietnam’s inclusion signals its importance in global supply chains, particularly for sectors like electronics, garments, and increasingly, semiconductors.

From our side, this signals that trade policy risk is not merely background noise. It’s active, near-term, and sharp enough to influence market pricing strategies. For participants who operate off assumptions of stability in cross-border flows, this shift in dialogue matters—it introduces the potential for volatility in export-driven revenue streams and cost inputs. Not weeks from now. Immediately.

What stands out is the methodical approach being deployed by Washington, choosing a small cohort of countries for bilateral talks instead of applying sweeping measures. This suggests there may be differentiated outcomes. Some partners could walk away with exemptions or modified duties, while others may face terms that create tighter import conditions. This uncertainty tilts the risk skew in a very specific direction, particularly when it comes to assets tethered to Southeast Asia.

Now, for those of us watching volatility metrics, particularly implied vol on regional equity indices and trade-sensitive FX pairs, these may soon require upward revisions. Price makers who’ve been leaning on historical correlations might do better to reconsider weighting near-term event risk in their models—this isn’t the type of headline cycle that resolves at a quiet pace.

Impact on Market Pricing Strategies

Although these negotiations are bilateral, repercussions stretch well beyond tariff categories. Think about the forward guidance implications—how this may inform central bank decisions on inflation pressures, raw material costs, or export competitiveness, all of which can filter quickly through to rate expectations and bond movements.

Thus, it would be a mistake to treat this as a dust-settling type of development. Instead, it appears to be more dynamic, especially if talk outcomes diverge across those six countries. The divergence alone could cause money flow rotations, both within EM-focused equity strategies and G10 FX trades.

Yields? If there’s any protectionist tone embedded in the outcomes, that could add to the upward pressure on U.S. inflation-protected securities, making breakevens more reactive than they’ve been in recent weeks. Remember, it’s rarely the top-line rate or duty percentage that changes the game—it’s the implied friction in the system that traders have to reprice.

We’d also advise looking again at hedging models that rely on assumptions of prior trade policy behaviour. Those assumptions, particularly ones based on the predictability of post-2020 diplomatic trends, might no longer hold up. Timing of option entries should be scrutinised too—gamma scalping strategies, at the money calls and puts, even variance swaps—anything directly sensitive to jump risks in macro exposures could realise faster than usual.

And while many will be watching for headlines out of Chính’s camp next week, the more telling indications might come, as they often do, through cross-asset reactions—credit spreads, swap curve kinks, or abrupt shifts in delta-adjusted positioning. That’s where the market tends to reveal what it’s pricing in, long before the politicians make their next move.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US-Japan Trade Talks

The Australian Dollar might strengthen after Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese wins a second term. The new government commits to policies that may fuel inflation, affecting the Reserve Bank of Australia’s ability to adjust interest rates.

Inflation data supports the AUD, with the TD-MI Inflation Gauge rising 0.6% MoM in April. Annual inflation is up to 3.3% from 2.8%, indicating ongoing inflationary pressures.

Tariffs are debated as protective economic tools but may raise prices and provoke trade wars. Donald Trump plans to use tariffs against Mexico, China, and Canada to bolster US producers and reduce taxes.

At around 93.40, the AUD/JPY pair reflects a balance tilting in favour of the Yen, primarily due to persistent hesitancy in global trade negotiations. The market has seen thinner-than-usual volumes stemming from a Japanese public holiday, though this temporary lull doesn’t reduce the broader directional drivers — especially those tied to risk sentiment and macroeconomic expectations.

Global Trade Negotiations

With trade negotiations between Washington and Beijing stalled, and neither leader planning face-to-face engagement, the appearance of progress is largely cosmetic. Based on Commerce Ministry assessments in Beijing, any shift could take weeks to materialise. That waiting game builds further demand for the Japanese Yen — traditionally seen as a shelter when negotiations falter or fail to produce tangible results. Risk-averse flows have not yet peaked, which implies a natural resistance point for AUD upwards momentum under current conditions.

US negotiations with Tokyo serve as an offsetting factor. Japan’s strategy centres on removing certain import taxes, particularly those targeting the vehicle sector. Reversing those Trump-era measures could also reopen trade channels and marginally weaken the Yen if investor sentiment gradually returns to a growth-oriented stance. However, these talks are under quiet pressure, with time constraints leading to limited flexibility. Removal of tariffs could, over time, narrow the short-term safe-haven advantage of the Yen.

Meanwhile, developments in Canberra add another layer to exposure across AUD-linked derivatives. With Albanese securing a second term, continuity in fiscal planning becomes more predictable. However, spending seen under his leadership — particularly in infrastructure and green energy sectors — aligns with upward pressure on prices. Inflation doesn’t appear to be fading. The TD Securities-Melbourne Institute inflation gauge showed a 0.6% lift month-on-month in April, which brings the annual pace to 3.3%. That’s a climb from the prior 2.8%, and it reinforces expectations that the Reserve Bank of Australia may need to hold or even tighten monetary policy sooner than previously anticipated.

As volatility creeps higher, derivative strategies may be best approached with a cautious bias against longer-term trend assumptions. For example, carry trades favouring AUD may come under stress unless upside interest rate differentials are confirmed by RBA action. At the same time, the relative strength of the Yen during macro shocks cannot be underestimated. We should consider reducing exposure where momentum lacks conviction, particularly until there is greater clarity on the US-China trade situation.

Tariffs, meanwhile, are not going away. Though pitched as temporary tools to support local industry, the use of tariffs across North American and Asian trade channels remains active. Trump’s intention to reintroduce them against multiple trading partners signals a return to protectionist measures. In economic terms, this could mean higher import costs and thereby fuel more inflation — the exact conditions central banks globally are attempting to rein in. The feedback loop from this style of policy making often leads to reactive rate adjustments, which then reshuffle options pricing, forward rates, and hedging costs.

What we’re seeing now is less about directional conviction in FX, and more about positioning with flexibility in mind. Patience might be underrated in the current environment. Hedging skew has begun to reflect that.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.