Donald Trump is set to announce new tariffs on pharmaceuticals in the coming weeks. These measures are part of his ongoing strategy to address perceived imbalances in trade.

The tariffs aim to target foreign pharmaceutical products, with an emphasis on reducing dependency on imports. This approach may influence the global pharmaceutical market and trade relations.

United States Pharmaceutical Consumption

Currently, the United States is among the largest consumers of pharmaceutical products in the world. These tariffs would possibly impact the pricing and availability of medications domestically.

Trump’s announcement follows his previous tariff implementations, which affected various sectors. Such measures have sparked discussions regarding the long-term effects on the economy and international trade dynamics.

Experts have noted concerns about potential repercussions, including increased costs for consumers. The full impact of these tariffs on the pharmaceutical industry remains to be seen.

Stakeholders are watching closely to understand how these changes will unfold. The upcoming weeks may bring further clarity as details of the tariffs are disclosed.

Policy Shifts In The Pharmaceutical Sector

What we’ve seen so far is a relatively direct extension of earlier trade actions, only this time focused on pharmaceuticals. The core objective appears to be reducing reliance on imported medicines, particularly from countries that are viewed as trade competitors. That in itself introduces a rather plain tension: on one side, there’s a push for domestic manufacturing; on the other, there’s the reality of cost structures and supply-chain dynamics that have taken decades to build. Collins pointed to this in her earlier remarks—underscoring how these systems don’t shift overnight and how supply disruption could spill over into prices, nearly immediately.

From the policy direction, it’s clear that the measures are not designed for cosmetic effect. They are expected to be enforced with the same intensity as earlier tariffs applied to technology and industrial goods. From our side—trading short-term volatility derived from policy changes like these—it becomes a matter of comparative timelines: which sectors will react first, and how will pricing models adjust before production does?

Johnson’s analysis earlier in the week brought up a relevant point. Pricing mechanisms in the derivatives market, particularly in options on healthcare indices, have started showing higher implied volatility. That’s likely not arbitrary. It reflects uncertainty not just in consumer markets but in future margins of large multinational producers.

Past trade actions hadn’t fully grappled with sectors tied so directly to human welfare. In earlier cases, higher prices on consumer goods were absorbed, or at least delayed, through warehousing, forward contracting, or consumer tolerance. Here, medication is time-sensitive, and health providers operate on a different margin structure. As direct inputs into pharmaceutical production spike or become subject to unreliable imports, we may see further rotation on price-response strategies, particularly in contracts structured with assumptions baked into old cost models.

Timing matters heavily here. As we monitor announcements, we should be examining the forward curves for signs of compounding risk. If markets factor a prolonged shift in sourcing and inventory behaviours, equity volatility may get priced in faster than usual. Last Thursday’s flattening in near-term spreads told part of that story—expectations on quicker response.

Looking at derivatives tied to basket exposures in the healthcare space—or instruments that lean heavily on large US-based producers—spreads are beginning to reflect a new pricing profile. It’s not simply that drug companies may appear more attractive due to re-shoring incentives. It is that hedging activity has intensified, perhaps pre-emptively. We should interpret that as a cue.

There’s an inclination among newer participants to assume that positions from the past two quarters may still benefit from hold-over sentiment. But if we’ve understood anything from previous tariff cycles, it’s that these announcements tend to disrupt consensus rather than confirm it. Quick positioning becomes essential—not in trying to forecast policy tone, but in observing how underlying risk exposure is being redistributed.

We are, in short, aiming at a moving target. But it’s not unpredictable. Changes to forward guidance are often embedded in the movement of implied vol before formal disclosure. Watching order flow in those markets might reveal more now than watching speeches. Signals are there, just not where they used to be.

Looking into the next couple of weeks, it’s imperative to be nimble with how options decay is reconsidered. We’ve adjusted risk ranges on short-dated volatility, while reweighting exposure to long-term put spreads in sectors likely to see ongoing scrutiny. The trade isn’t only about pharmaceuticals—it’s about how policy shifts settle into hard prices across any category held to cross-border reliance.

From this moment, we’ll be studying not just where the tariffs fall, but how the market prepares itself even before the specifics are made public. This isn’t a moment to sit with open calls on stability. It’s a time for recalibration, based on cues already available in market structure itself.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The US Dollar was under pressure, extending its losses due to selling interest. Focus shifts to central bank rate decisions, particularly the Federal Reserve.

The US Dollar Index (DXY) saw minor losses, ending near 100.00. Key upcoming data includes the Balance of Trade and the API’s US crude oil inventory report.

Euro Dollar Movement

EUR/USD made a marginal advance around 1.1300. Upcoming releases include Germany’s HCOB Services PMIs and regional Producer Prices.

GBP/USD reversed a four-day loss streak, with support at 1.3270-1.3260. The UK will release its final S&P Global Services PMI data soon.

USD/JPY retraced to the mid-143.00s, influenced by the Greenback’s mild fall. Japan awaits the Jibun Bank Services PMI on May 7.

AUD/USD rose, nearing the 0.6500 mark, following Friday’s climb. Australia will release data on Building Permits and Private House Approvals next.

WTI prices declined towards yearly lows near $55, with OPEC+ signalling output cuts in June. Gold rose past $3,300 per ounce, supported by stable safe-haven demand, while silver found support around $32.00 per ounce.

What we’re seeing is a coordinated pause in the recent dollar strength, driven not so much by a single data point but by the market recalibrating expectations around coming interest rate decisions. Momentum on the US Dollar Index drifting lower, hovering around the 100.00 handle, suggests that short positions are being favoured while traders wait for more insight from the Federal Reserve. If trade and energy figures further disappoint, this bias may persist into the second half of the month.

For those watching EUR/USD, the pair has started to creep higher, finding support around 1.1300. This isn’t a wide stretch, but enough to suggest buyers are stepping in ahead of Germany’s services and pricing data. We consider this data particularly useful in gauging inflation trends in the region, which could cause sharp repricing on rate bets depending how it prints. Any beat in Producer Prices or better-than-expected PMIs from Germany could trigger a continued upward trajectory. That may hint at room for further divergence trades, especially if paired with subdued data out of the US.

Sterling Performance and Outlook

Sterling has broken out of its four-day slide, holding above the 1.3260 area. There appears to be fresh interest ahead of the UK’s final services print, which tends to be overlooked but has caught attention this time due to recent revisions. If the final numbers align or even post a modest upside revision, it may motivate carry-seeking flows, particularly if short-term gilts remain stable. This can prompt some tactical long placements on the pound in the interim, especially in relative yield comparisons.

Meanwhile, USD/JPY has stepped back, floating around the mid-143.00s. The mild retreat in the US dollar, paired with Japanese data releases, might draw further downsizing of long dollar exposure into Jibun Bank’s Services data. Should the services sector underperform, yen strength could reappear, adding pressure to those still overleveraged in one-directional positions. We will be watching volatility levels here, as thin liquidity can exaggerate movements.

AUD/USD also edged responsibly higher, pushing towards 0.6500. Beyond this being a technically interesting zone, upcoming building and housing permit releases may add fuel to the move. Even modest upside surprises could validate traders leaning long on a short-term basis, especially if risk sentiment globally improves. Watch for price action reactions—much depends on whether the follow-through carries over into the Asia session.

Elsewhere, commodity-linked plays deserve close attention. West Texas Intermediate crude sank towards $55, which places it near multi-month lows. With OPEC+ alluding to possible output cuts at the next monthly meeting, we find the space open for speculative interest to accumulate again if confirmation comes early. Keep an eye on inventory reads this week—they often steer sentiment before official output announcements even surface.

Precious metals, by contrast, are turning into safe parking zones again. Gold lifted comfortably upwards past $3,300, reflecting renewed defensive positioning. Silver, too, held steady around $32, showing that the appetite for tangible assets hasn’t disappeared. These gains don’t appear purely speculative—they have coincided with weaker dollar trade and slipping Treasury yields, both of which typically support metals. There is opportunity here for those looking to hedge against either market shocks or prolonged central bank inaction.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US Commerce Secretary Lutnick discussed trade relations with Canada on Fox Business, underlining the complexity of reaching a trade deal. He noted there is unlikely to be a trade agreement in the near term due to these complexities.

Lutnick’s remarks suggest the negotiations face several challenges. He conveyed a realistic outlook, recognising the hurdles rather than giving an overly positive perspective.

Trade Negotiation Challenges

Lutnick’s remarks laid bare the hurdles that remain between Washington and Ottawa. His tone was grounded, not dressing up the situation with diplomatic optimism. What’s evident is that talks have slowed to a crawl as both sides weigh domestic political pressures, sector-by-sector disagreements, and regulatory frictions that aren’t quickly handled.

This creates some knock-on effects for those of us analysing forward market movement. We aren’t necessarily staring down immediate volatility, but it’s enough to pull certain assumptions into question. A drawn-out discussion over bilateral trade tends to shift expectations around materials, services, and even currency exposure, particularly if there’s a hesitation in border-related agreements.

For us, it means watching implied volatility more carefully across certain sectors—especially those tethered to cross-border capital flows and trade-sensitive equities. This messiness can press risk pricing upwards in niche corners while total volume remains steady, or even retreats. We shouldn’t dismiss the effect of slow politics on industrial hedging behaviour.

Adjusting Market Expectations

Expectations around timing may also need stretching. If Lutnick sees distance between the negotiating teams, then our models must reflect that distance too, both in timeline and pricing. It’s not about panic; it’s about recalibrating what’s likely, and measuring the knock-on effects this delay might have. Anything making supply chains stingier or tariffs more uncertain will nudge derivative positioning.

We may also find options traders widening their strike range, and perhaps reducing tenure. That’s not retreat; that’s strategy nudging away from constricted bets in favour of agility. There’s no sense in waiting for a deal that’s not even heading for debate, never mind ratification.

Ironically, this clarity around difficulty brings a kind of calm. No surprises here—just confirmation that a pause is still a pause. The moment one side stirs or introduces a new policy mechanism, short-term contracts could feel tighter. Till then, prices may stay in their bands with nothing except cautious rotation beneath the hood.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Pound Sterling increased by 0.32% against the US Dollar, reaching above 1.33, as US data indicated growth in the services sector. Despite this, the US Dollar did not find support, and GBP/USD trades at 1.3300.

The GBP/USD pair could not maintain its peak of 1.3330 due to the stronger US Dollar following the US ISM Services PMI data. The report showed an unexpected rise in services sector activity, yet the GBP/USD pair remains 0.30% higher.

Early European Trading Update

The GBP/USD is around 1.3290 during early European trading on Monday. The US Dollar has weakened amid economic uncertainties related to US trade policies.

What we’ve seen so far is a relatively moderate rise in the Sterling, which picked up 0.32% against the greenback, briefly moving beyond the 1.33 mark. Though this might seem like upward momentum, it’s more telling of the US Dollar’s softness than outright Pound strength. The ISM Services PMI showed a surprise uptick—ordinarily a bullish sign for the Dollar—but that didn’t last. In fact, the currency couldn’t find its footing even with stronger data on its side.

Markets often behave in ways that don’t match textbook expectations. Here, we have an instance where the Dollar is seemingly ignoring positive domestic data. That suggests traders may be focusing more heavily on broader concerns—likely the uncertainty surrounding US trade rhetoric and its potential impact on growth trajectory. The PMI figures should have, in theory, backed the Dollar. Instead, Sterling held onto an early lead.

By the time Europe opened, GBP/USD had edged down slightly towards 1.3290. This minor pullback isn’t surprising. Many pairs tend to ease after sharp moves as buyers and sellers realign on fresh information. Any attempt to break above 1.3330 again might be met with resistance, unless upcoming developments support clearer directional bias.

Short Term Market Outlook

We’re watching the 1.3250 level as potentially supportive in the short term. It’s an area where some bids may come in, particularly if sentiment remains tilted against the Dollar. However, the situation remains sensitive to headlines—especially those concerning the US administration’s stance on tariffs and global trade.

Looking at rate pricing, the Fed’s next steps still feel open to influence. Although inflation remains sticky, parts of the data are sending conflicting messages, making futures positions tricky to pin down. That’s added extra volatility along the forward curve, especially in the belly.

What stands out most is that the market seems more comfortable fading Dollar rallies than chasing them. For traders holding leveraged positions via options or futures, this makes timing less forgiving. Direction is one thing, but choosing the right expiry or strike is getting harder to model with confidence.

So we’re staying light on heavy directional exposure unless confirmation from macro prints aligns. For now, short-dated vols remain attractive if tied to defined risk. The Pound’s resilience carries weight, but without continuation in flows or positioning to back it up, this could just as easily unwind.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Palantir reported earnings per share (EPS) of $0.13, matching expectations, and generated revenues of $884 million, exceeding the expected $861 million. The company’s guidance for the second quarter is in the range of $934 to $938 million, surpassing the anticipated $898 million. For the full year 2025, Palantir projects revenues between $3.89 and $3.90 billion, above the expected $3.75 billion. Despite this performance, Palantir’s shares decreased by 1.50% during after-hours trading.

Ford Motor reported an EPS of $0.14, aligning with forecasts, and revenues of $40.66 billion, outstripping the expected $36.20 billion. However, Ford suspended its guidance for 2025, citing near-term risks related to material tariffs. This introduces uncertainty regarding its financial performance projections for the coming period.

The article above lays out quarterly earnings from two companies—one from the software sector and the other from automotive manufacturing. Both hit their earnings per share estimates, with revenue beats that were, in technical terms, clear positive surprises. What stands out, however, is not just the headline results, but how investors chose to interpret them. Despite exceeding revenue expectations and reaffirming annual guidance, Palantir experienced a modest dip after hours. Meanwhile, Ford raised an eyebrow by withholding forward-looking guidance, citing short-term tariff exposure on input materials—a move that won’t inspire confidence in the current climate.

So, what’s actually happened here? We’ve got one firm delivering what it promised and offering an even more optimistic revenue outlook for the next quarter and beyond. Yet, the share price still moved down slightly. That tells us everything we need to know about how tightly short-term sentiment remains intertwined with guidance reactions, even more than how well a company performs in the most recent quarter. Any good surprise, it appears, still needs future visibility to hold investor attention. Simply put, markets are looking multiple steps ahead.

On the other side, Ford beat revenue forecasts by a wide margin—a figure over $4 billion higher than what had been priced in. That’s not something we see ignored. But pulling back from giving full-year direction sends a very different signal: caution. When a company pauses guidance like this, it often means its internal forecasts are facing pressure, or visibility is narrowing. The fact that tariffs specifically were cited suggests cost-side volatility is what’s causing clouds to form. This is particularly relevant since automotive manufacturing is hugely sensitive to even small shifts in supply chain pricing. That kind of unknown input can shape margin compression before volumes even change.

For those of us watching implied volatility and price skew, these data points open up several short-term patterns to monitor. In the case of the first company, despite robust performance, the share reaction was mildly negative—indicator-wise, this leans into a potential overbought signal or heightened expectations already priced into options. When guidance gets strengthened yet the price doesn’t follow, call-side premiums can begin adjusting downward. That shapes our attention toward delta-neutral or calendar spread setups. Skews may shift in favour of short gamma trades as realised volatility levels remain muted against implied levels that could begin softening near close.

Where the auto maker is concerned, dropping guidance altogether is not shrugged off lightly. Tariff anxiety tends to move rapidly into options pricing, with traders repositioning around short-dated puts and hedging downside protection. This introduces a clearer directional play, assuming implied volatility reads jump in tandem. With such a large top-line beat, the question becomes how fast margins might suffer if costs escalate faster than production efficiency. We’d expect traders to start flattening the curve along the back end of OTM puts, bracing for unexpected lurches.

In the days ahead, we’d keep a close eye on how open interest shifts across multiple strikes, particularly in names where forward visibility, or the lack of it, becomes the primary story. When revenue surprises can’t support sentiment, that’s when mispriced volatility strategies begin to present more concrete risk-reward setups. We only position once that mispricing becomes visible not just in implieds but in actual response, confirmed in volume flow and tightening bid-ask spreads around key strikes.

We adjust, not based on headlines, but on reaction patterns—because the latter hinge on probability, not optimism.

Silver’s price rose close to 1% on Monday, amidst pressure on the US Dollar and an increased demand for safe-haven assets like precious metals. Currently, XAG/USD stands at $32.30, recovering from daily lows of $31.98, and fluctuates within the $31.67–$32.61 range.

The price increase follows US President Donald Trump’s tariff announcements, which weakened the Dollar and boosted Silver’s appeal. Should XAG/USD rise above $33.50, it could target $34.00, whereas slipping below $31.67 may push it towards the 200-day SMA at $31.11.

Silver hit a peak on March 28 at $34.58, then plunged to $28.33, a six-month low. Although it recovered, it remained below $34.00, stabilising in its current range in recent trading days, with momentum indicators favouring sellers since May 1.

If XAG/USD breaches $33.00, Silver might test support at the 100-day SMA of $31.67 or the 200-day SMA of $31.11. Silver, less popular than Gold, is traded for value diversification and inflation hedges, with availability in physical and financial market forms. Its price fluctuates with interest rates, geopolitical factors, Dollar strength, mining supply, and demand in major sectors like electronics and solar energy.

Silver prices often move in tandem with Gold, sharing similar safe-haven status, and are influenced by the Gold/Silver ratio. This ratio can indicate potential relative value between the two metals.

What we’re seeing here is an uptick in silver prices, largely driven by external pressure on the US Dollar and a shift in sentiment toward perceived stability—precious metals being among the go-to options. Silver moved up by nearly 1% on Monday, now hovering around $32.30. That’s a recovery from an earlier dip but hasn’t yet broken to the upside. That range between $31.67 and $32.61 has kept it boxed in, for now.

This latest move came after President Trump’s announcement on tariffs, which had a weakening effect on the Dollar. When the Dollar retreats, anything priced in it—Silver included—can become more attractive. This makes the metal more affordable to foreign buyers, and suddenly, demand builds. Those looking at the $33.50 level will want to keep a close eye. A break above that number could shift focus towards $34.00. But if it falls below $31.67, the next active level sits around the 200-day simple moving average at $31.11. That matters, not because of short-term charts, but because it’s generally watched by a wide audience and could spark either support or momentum-based selling.

From a broader view, prices peaked back in late March, above $34.50, only to fall to a six-month trough near $28.30. Since then, recovery has been hesitant. Not weak, just cautious. Sellers, from what we’ve tracked since early May, have been slowly gaining traction, and momentum tools continue to lean in their favour. That doesn’t imply a collapse is ahead, just that upward advances are meeting regular resistance.

If we get a push past $33.00, markets could look to that 100-day SMA now resting just under the $31.70 mark as a point of renewed scrutiny. That same moving average level aligns well with the bottom end of the current range, giving it more meaning than just a number on a chart. Below that, the 200-day at $31.11 could come into play—it’s both a technical threshold and a confidence zone for fund-driven trading desks.

More broadly, Silver functions as a diversification tool when traders want to balance out exposure away from risk-sensitive instruments, especially in times when inflation, interest rates or broader currency shifts are expected to move. Unlike Gold, it’s less in the spotlight, but that also allows more room for quiet momentum to build or unwind without major headlines. With sectors like electronics and solar technology slowly increasing their role in consumption, any supply squeeze or production lag has downstream implications.

Movements in Gold also help shape price action. The ratio between Gold and Silver is one we monitor regularly; when it stretches too far, corrections tend to follow—sometimes sharply. A widening gap often signals that Silver is undervalued relative to Gold and can attract longer-term positioning seeking reversion.

Heading into the next few trading sessions, attention will likely stay on the Dollar’s trajectory, residual trade noise from Washington, and whether precious metals can retain their current safe-haven appeal. Any sudden jump in implied volatility or continued Dollar weakness could see renewed buying interest. On the flip side, should yields start rising again or geopolitical risks abate, some traders will rotate out—particularly those operating with shorter timeframes.

Every level now carries context. Each threshold tells us something about positioning, expectations, and how tightly wound sentiment is. Keep responses nimble. Let data—not bias—guide the next trade.

Market Movements and Expectations

The current session in the S&P has been marked by a shallow early gain, followed by steady, broad declines. Price action today has indicated a more pronounced shift after several sessions where upward momentum held fast. Down by over twenty points at the time of writing, the index shows signs not of panic but of measured reallocation. The low of the day—more than fifty points below the open—suggests a reluctance by some market participants to hold key positions into the earnings calls this evening.

This type of reluctance speaks volumes. When markets begin to shed gains near session ends, particularly following a consistent rally, we often reassess whether trends are pausing or waning. As volatility remains compressed and trading volumes hold within familiar bands, it’s noticeable we continue to encounter resistance near recent highs. That means we’ve entered a delicate period where market makers aren’t certain where the next catalyst will come from, or whether it will sustain momentum.

With just minutes left in active trading, all eyes have shifted to the after-hours announcements. Palantir’s trajectory tells an interesting story. From a February high, through a rapid correction, and into a partial recovery—it’s navigated the full arc of common sentiment cycles within six months. The narrowing of price movement in recent sessions hinted at expectations being built in. Particularly, the fact that the stock traded shy of its former peak before slipping may be interpreted as a market that is pricing in strong results but not without some doubt. It’s not a stretch to say that its current valuation suggests the earnings and revenue beats, if they occur, had better be more than just matching expectations—they’ll need to exceed them materially to avoid further downside.

Market Sensitivity and Opportunities

On the other hand, there’s a less optimistic tone for an automaker whose recovery has remained within defined bounds. The steep drop earlier in the year snapped some mid-term moving averages, and despite the recent reversal, prices haven’t broken above previous caps. There’s a growing sense that many participants are viewing it as a value trap, especially given that estimated EPS is precisely flat, while revenue is set to fall double digits. That combination has rarely inspired confidence. The technical checkpoints—such as prices approaching former highs and failing to breach them—signal that support is shaky.

This creates an environment where taking directional bets linked to earnings becomes riskier. We are in a window where implied volatility in options has been drifting upwards, albeit not abruptly. For us, that implies premiums are beginning to bake in uncertainty, particularly for stocks that have travelled long distances without accompanying strength in earnings.

From what we’ve seen so far in today’s market, participants should act with measured precision. Watching today’s price reversals, compounded by divergent expectations across sectors, risk-reward skews appear less favourable than usual. Movement ahead will likely be more reactive than predictive. If today’s late-session sell-off deepens into close, spreads and gamma exposure could require recalibration. Especially for those running short-dated positions, what happens in the next 90 minutes might prompt wholesale repricing overnight.

Given the patterns observed, expect higher velocity in aftermarket moves—especially in names where expectations are both high and not priced in cautiously. If momentum falters, and levels like the 10.25 region in industrials or the 124 level in established tech are broken in negative direction, there won’t be much in the way of natural buyers until well below. That tells us plenty about sensitivity. Approaches that lean too heavily into prior positive trends should be reconsidered until volatility offers better clarity.

We’ll be watching delta hedging dynamics into tomorrow and beyond, particularly in names with wide implied move ranges versus realised volatility. It’s those discrepancies that often present opportunities—but only where structure justifies the risk.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The USD/TWD pair trades near 28.95 after a two-day drop of over 10%, spurred by speculation on Taiwan revaluing the TWD. Asia’s currency rally is driven by expectations that regional currencies could strengthen to secure U.S. trade benefits. Technical analysis indicates a bearish trend, with support at 28.80 and resistance at 29.60.

USD/TWD fell to around 28.90 on Monday, deepening a historic drop with a 5.7% decline adding to Friday’s 4.4% fall. The Taiwan Dollar’s two-day increase of more than 10% is the largest in over thirty years, sparking speculation on Asian currencies appreciating for leverage in U.S. trade talks.

Taiwanese Central Bank Stance

The Taiwanese central bank denies coordinating with the U.S., with the Governor confirming no exchange rate discussions. However, markets viewed the bank’s stance and money inflows from exporters as signalling TWD appreciation. This brought TWD to its strongest since mid-2022, increasing volatility in Asia’s currencies.

This trend affected other major regional currencies; the U.S. dollar fell 0.7% against the yen and Australian dollar, the latter reaching a five-month high. The offshore Chinese yuan peaked at 7.1881. Sentiment shifts as markets move past President Trump’s tariffs, boosting risk-sensitive and emerging market currencies.

The USD/TWD pair has edged slightly higher to around 28.95 following a remarkable slide over the past two sessions. That sharp drop—amounting to more than 10%—was triggered by growing assumptions that Taiwan may permit its currency to appreciate. The reasoning behind this move, which isn’t explicitly confirmed, lies in the possibility that stronger regional currencies might help smooth over trade relations with the United States. Many interpreted this as an unofficial revaluation, or at least a tolerance of stronger pricing from the central bank.

Now, with the Taiwanese dollar at its firmest level since the middle of 2022, price action has become much more erratic. Traders attempting to gauge price direction are watching the 28.80 support area with keen interest; a close beneath it could confirm further downside in the USD/TWD rate. The 29.60 level now acts as the nearest ceiling, likely to face sellers if prices reclaim it.

Currency Market Strategies

The official line from the central bank is that no conversations were held with their U.S. counterparts regarding currency levels, according to their Governor. There’s a clear message of non-intervention. Still, the trading community seems to have taken continued capital inflows and signals in the fixed income market as indirect consent for further strength in the TWD. Exporters’ positioning has likely added to these flows, reinforcing the bullish stance on the currency.

We’ve also seen this sentiment spill over elsewhere in Asia. The yen and the Australian dollar both extended gains against the U.S. dollar, with the latter pushing to its best level in five months. In China, the offshore yuan touched 7.1881, briefly reaching levels that suggest growing confidence in Asia’s broader currency profile. What’s emerging is not just a reaction to short-term fluctuations but a larger repositioning, especially as policy clarity from Washington takes shape well beyond the tariff era introduced under the previous U.S. administration.

For those who operate in derivatives, it’s a moment to monitor implied volatility closely. When spot prices move as quickly as they have done in recent sessions, option premiums may widen, offering chances for spread strategies or gamma trades with favourable skews. The speed and scale of these moves suggest the market is pricing in more than just short-term noise. Macro assumptions are shifting rapidly across major Asian FX pairs, and these may influence broader carry trades, particularly those involving low beta economies.

Rather than chasing moves, it may be more prudent to assess which directional biases have become crowded. Given the unusual scale of TWD appreciation, mean-reversion ideas shouldn’t be ruled out. But we’d be cautious about shorting strength prematurely. Watching how central banks behave in silence—by looking at balance sheet changes, or TWD liquidity supply—may be far more insightful than any public statement.

There’s an underlying assumption now that regional policymakers could tolerate modest appreciation, perhaps to lessen tensions over trade balances or draw in stable inflows. Whether that view holds up will be tested in the coming weeks. What we’ve seen so far reflects a market reassessing fair value in light of new geopolitical undercurrents and realignment of trade policy footing. The challenge moving forward is to separate the speculative unwind from a structural shift in currency policy. We’ll be watching the forward curve and non-deliverable forwards (NDFs) for further clues on sentiment and central bank tolerance.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The EUR/USD currency pair saw an ascension, trading around the 1.1300 mark after the European session. The movement remained within the mid-range of the day’s trading, showing a steady rise rather than a sudden surge.

Even as momentum indicators hint at consolidation, the general trend stayed bullish with support from aligned key moving averages. The Relative Strength Index stood neutral near 58, indicating moderate momentum without overbought signals.

Moving Averages Analysis

The 20-day, 100-day, and 200-day Simple Moving Averages are positioned below the current price, directing upwards, which fortifies the technical outlook. The 30-day Exponential and Simple Moving Averages are also rising, consistent with the short-to-medium term upward movement.

Support levels are identified at 1.1314, 1.1287, and 1.1279, while resistance is at 1.1331 and 1.1353. An upward move beyond resistance could indicate further bullish continuation, and a fall below immediate support may lead to a retest of recent low points.

This section outlines a relatively calm yet upward-trending movement in the EUR/USD pair, with price action gradually climbing to just around the 1.1300 level during the European session. While the move lacks sharp spikes, the price has managed to sustain a firm footing in the day’s mid-range zone without showing signs of abrupt recoil. What stands out is the consistency of upward pressure without crossing into overheated momentum territory.

Price Action Observations

With the Relative Strength Index settled near 58, momentum hasn’t overextended, which typically suggests there’s fuel left in the movement without entering the usual zones associated with volatility reversals. It doesn’t point towards immediate exhaustion—more a suggestion that the current pace is balanced. The support from longer-duration moving averages remains aligned, reinforcing a broader constructive tendency in price direction. All three major Simple Moving Averages—20, 100, and 200-day—are sitting comfortably underneath the current price, angled upward. That reflects an ongoing bias in favour of the buyers from a longer view.

More recently, the 30-day exponential and simple versions are echoing the same message. When the shorter-term indicators are also pointing the same way, we tend to see it as confirmation. This paints a backdrop where any slight decline is more likely to find buyers stepping in, rather than triggering abrupt downside.

Now, when examining reactive zones, it becomes essential to note where price may struggle or turn. Support seems to begin at 1.1314 and extends through 1.1287 to 1.1279. These levels have so far helped contain dips. If the pair were to dip beneath those thresholds, it would likely push it into the vicinity of recent troughs, hinting at a shift in strength.

On the other hand, resistance appears more tightly bound between 1.1331 and 1.1353. These aren’t just numbers—they represent zones where offers are expected to reassert themselves. Should that upper barrier be taken out, the behaviour that follows will be important. A strong push and stable hold above that region would send a clear signal that the buyers have reclaimed control for the time being.

For those managing expiry timelines or structuring directional exposure around deltas, a close eye on price action near those resistance levels will be essential. Breakouts accompanied by volume and slow recalibration of implieds could offer directional follow-through. However, if price stalls or gets repeatedly rejected around that area, recalibrating gamma risk may be prudent, especially on shorter tenors.

Carry signals aren’t directly triggering anything immediate, but we remain alert to what comes after the test of resistance unfolds. If follow-through fails, a fast pullback to test support would be expected, offering two-way potential with short-dated trades. Subtle shifts in structure will also likely affect skew positioning, especially if ranges compress just below resistance. Watch for liquidity thinning ahead of key data or policy risk, which could quickly amplify sensitivity in the upper ranges.

So, with bias still tilted positively and signals not overheated, exposure tilted in that direction can hold, yet must be nimble enough to pare back if reaction around upper thresholds turns stiff.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

WTI crude oil decreased by $1.16, settling at $57.13 per barrel. Despite this decline, there is some relief in the sector as OPEC+ increased production recently and plans to continue until Kazakhstan and Iraq cooperate in repaying excess barrels.

The price has not breached the April low of $55.12, but a positive development will be needed to push prices higher. If this does not occur, the oil market will gradually rebalance over time.

Effects of Price on US Drilling Activity
When prices hit $55, US producers typically reduce drilling activities. Due to natural decline rates of 20% per year, the available oil supply tends to decrease relatively quickly.

With West Texas Intermediate dipping by $1.16 to close at $57.13, we’re observing a retracement that falls short of the April trough of $55.12. That level acts as a threshold—a kind of psychological floor. The recent output increase by OPEC+ may be offering near-term breathing room, particularly as they push for compliance from Iraq and Kazakhstan on previous excesses. If these countries follow through, and no fresh supply disruptions occur, then supply levels will stay steady or even nudge higher.

Nevertheless, without any fresh market-moving optimism—be it from stronger demand indicators, a weather-related disruption, or tighter refinery margins—prices are likely to hover around this band or slide slowly lower. The rebound will not come out of nowhere. Absent that external impetus, we simply allow the system to move toward a natural state of reduced production growth and modest winnowing of excess stock.

Looking historically, whenever WTI approaches $55, we tend to see a softening in US drilling activity. That’s largely because, at that price point, profit margins for newer plays often come under pressure. With existing well output falling by approximately 20% annually due to natural decline, supply has a tendency to tighten unless offset by new production. When that fresh drilling slows, inventory starts to lean out.

Market Reactions and Sentiment
Some key players with exposure to shale might notice their hedging ratios shift. It would be prudent to consider positioning with awareness of the fact that if prices meander south of $55, the active rig count usually tracks lower within two or three reporting cycles. That makes the $55 threshold not just a floor, but also a trigger.

We’ve often seen that reactions to changes in OPEC+ output take time to show up in market structures. Therefore, prompt signals shouldn’t always be expected. What we do observe is that when forward curves begin to flatten or flip to backwardation, there’s clearer evidence of physical tightening. Until then, we’re navigating through a sentiment-driven market—fluctuating not on immediate data, but on expectations.

Given that, we pay close attention to the short-dated option space. Strikes around $55 attract the most attention, creating fairly evident gamma pockets. There’s a modest build-up of open interest further down the curve too, suggesting that the trading community is managing risk but not bracing for dramatic Implied Volatility surges just yet.

We monitor these zones closely. Timing matters almost as much as levels. Watching for when and how activity reacts to pricing shifts, rather than merely the price itself, will guide our next strategy adjustments. Until we see genuine reductions in inventory—or an event that meaningfully alters the demand curve—we view the market as range-bound with exposures best managed near pivot levels.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.