The chairman of the Swiss National Bank (SNB), Martin Schlegel, stated that the possibility of reintroducing negative interest rates has not been dismissed. He acknowledged that negative rates are generally unpopular, but emphasised that the SNB is ready to implement them if needed.

Schlegel also mentioned expectations for a decrease in Swiss inflation. The implication of these remarks suggests a potential move towards negative interest rates by the SNB.

The Central Bank’s Strategy

Schlegel’s remarks, while measured, offer a clear signal about how the SNB may respond if inflation does not settle near its target in the near term. From our perspective, the phrase “ready to implement” goes beyond posturing—it lays a technical and psychological foundation for investors to begin modelling future rate scenarios that include negative territory. We would note that such forward guidance, though carefully worded, tends to have a tangible effect on forward rate pricing and optionality skew.

What this tells us, in simple terms, is that the central bank is not looking to surprise the market with abrupt decisions, but would prefer tightening or easing to occur via expectations. That said, there’s a strong argument that Swiss policymakers are signalling flexibility in order to retain control over the franc, especially should global disinflationary trends strengthen. While inflation in Switzerland has remained relatively subdued compared with European peers, the readiness to act pre-emptively shows a bias towards stability over higher core returns.

Given this positioning, we are likely to see increased pricing of optionality around the zero lower bound in Swiss rate derivatives. Euro-Franc cross-currency basis spreads may begin to reflect a mild premium for downside protection. That sort of movement—if observed in the coming sessions—could be interpreted as dealers trying to reduce exposure to a steeper front-end cut curve.

We should point out that talk of pushing rates below zero again, even nominally, will not sit well with all investors. However, what matters more right now is not whether the policy is well-liked, but that it is part of the SNB’s viable toolkit. With that in mind, short-dated vols in CHF-linked contracts warrant a closer look, as they are priced quite benignly at present which may not fully reflect tail risks introduced by Schlegel’s comments.

Potential Market Impact

In practical terms, those managing CHF interest rate structures may need to reassess existing flatteners. There’s a non-negligible combination of event risk linked to both the SNB’s upcoming meetings and external rate paths, particularly from the ECB. It’s also worth noting that when central bankers float policy shifts in interviews or panel discussions rather than official minutes, it’s often a soft form of forward guidance. That means it should be weighted accordingly in our models.

Positioning shifts may occur quietly at first. We’ve already seen similar prior episodes when forward guidance alone triggered repricing without any actual change in policy. As rate curves adjust, and as long as inflation expectations remain anchored, the return of negative policy rates—even if only modestly discussed—should push attention to hedging against downward yield surprises.

We’d be remiss not to evaluate whether carry trades involving Swiss instruments are still offering favourable asymmetry. With Schlegel describing negative rates as still “on the table,” a number of FX-linked expressions may begin to tilt towards defensive positioning. Watch two-year OIS differentials in particular.

All of this, taken together, suggests that an active reassessment of low-rate sensitivity may be prudent. Not because we expect an immediate decision, but because the cost of protection now versus potential repricing later creates a fairly explainable incentive to start buying optionality early. Even subtle changes in tone from officials have a tendency to cascade through the rate space in a slow but relentless way.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

OPEC+ is set to implement another aggressive supply increase. Effective from June, this move marks a shift in their policy. Recent decisions suggest further supply increases may be likely in the upcoming months. This change has prompted a revision of oil forecasts, predicting a reduction in prices.

Saudi Arabia is leading the charge for larger supply increases, aiming at members producing above their targets. OPEC+ surprised the market in April with an unexpected increase of 411k barrels per day for May. Recently, they announced a similarly bold increase for June. Originally, OPEC+ aimed to bring back 2.2 million barrels per day over an 18-month timeline.

Supply Dynamics Affected By Tariff Risks

Demand uncertainties persist due to tariff risks, adding to supply-side unpredictability. The group will determine future output levels on a monthly basis. Saudi Arabia’s tolerance for low prices over time is a key factor. With current prices below their fiscal breakeven of US$90 per barrel, Saudi Arabia might need to adjust their budget or seek debt solutions. The increasing gap between their fiscal needs and market prices suggests potential spending cuts or debt market engagement.

What this means is that the wider group of oil-exporting nations, together with key Gulf producers, is no longer holding back supply in the way we became used to. More oil is coming to the market, and it’s happening faster than previously communicated. The original plan was to add 2.2 million barrels per day in stages over a year and a half—but decisions taken in April and recently in May have brought that forward. In plain terms, there’s more oil sloshing around than people were expecting even a few weeks ago.

The market felt the impact of that surprise. We noticed downward pressure on crude prices almost immediately after the early signals of stronger-than-expected output. A fresh bout of supply from key exporters into a market still navigating weak demand data left little room for pricing strength. Brent futures drifted lower, and implied volatility in options markets has picked up. The forward curve flattened. In short, the floor under prices got a bit weaker.

It’s not just the volume of new barrels that matters—it’s the pace and timing of these decisions. The monthly nature of these updates keeps uncertainty alive, especially for short-duration contracts and those positioned in the front end of the curve. For traders watching implied vol levels or looking for hedging signals, this kind of pacing creates sharp micro-adjustments in expectations. With each monthly review, the potential for another change in supply sits in the background, influencing risk pricing.

Impact Of Tariff Risks On Demand Side

Tariff risks on the demand side are also noticeable. Unclear trade terms, especially between major economies like the US and China, are making end-user demand in certain sectors look shakier. That’s feeding into a murky demand outlook, which, when combined with more barrels—and from members previously not compliant with production limits—leans bearish. It’s not about fear, but recalibration. Price forecasts have already responded and implied options skew has shifted slightly more neutral after spiking in late Q1.

Looking at Saudi Arabia more deeply, the endurance of lower prices is something we’re watching closely. With prices anywhere near current levels, they are flirting with a fiscal shortfall. Their state budget assumes oil at around US$90 a barrel, and anything shy of that implies a widening deficit. This becomes even more relevant if they remain committed to holding production high. That balance—supporting broader OPEC+ output while managing domestic financial stability—forces choices. They can either trim spending or increase debt issuance. Either option carries implications for oil policy.

For those of us positioning over the next few weeks, especially in derivatives tied to prompt delivery, we are factoring in this shorter cycle of policy direction. The era of long phases of supply consistency appears to have changed. Now, we must watch announcements more frequently and prepare for fast pivots. Curve positioning is adjusting accordingly. Call skew in medium-dated options has eased back, while put interest is growing modestly as traders attempt to guard against a further leg lower in flat price.

With monthly meetings determining future volumes, and price action increasingly driven by policy moves rather than inventory or consumption shifts, it’s essential to keep models flexible. Options markets are likely to stay active, especially near key expiry points. Continuing this trend of volume expansion, unless curtailed by internal dissent or macro shocks, should remain a pressure point for longs.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The EU’s Trade Commissioner, Maros Sefcovic, has proposed the removal of tariffs on industrial goods. The aim is to accelerate trade discussions with countries like India.

An additional €170 billion of US exports might face tariffs, underscoring the challenges in current trade dynamics. The EU is prepared to employ all available tools for trade defence.

Zero For Zero Tariffs

This proposal of 0 for 0 tariffs is not new, having been known for weeks. However, a breakthrough has yet to be achieved in negotiations.

French Finance Minister Lombard recently discussed the idea of mutual zero tariffs with Scott Bessent. Bessent mentioned that achieving such an agreement is a realistic possibility, sustaining ongoing hopes for progress.

What the above content highlights is a potential shift in the European Union’s trade strategy. Sefcovic is suggesting the complete removal of tariffs on industrial products—something that would make it markedly easier for countries outside of Europe, such as India, to sell their goods within the EU. In return, the EU would expect equivalent access to those markets. This “0 for 0” tariff model—as it’s often referred to—has been floating around for some time now. It’s not a novel idea, and despite being broadly discussed, nothing concrete has been finalised.

We’re also being reminded of unresolved tensions, particularly with the United States. Washington may soon see €170 billion worth of its exports affected by tariffs from the EU. This large figure doesn’t just show that the issue is alive—it warns that further policy moves could happen fast. Brussels has openly stated it is prepared to use every trade measure at its disposal, meaning this isn’t just diplomatic theatre. There’s a real edge to it.

Financial Market Implications

The conversation held by Lombard and Bessent adds more shape to this picture. The French minister’s remarks during his exchange with Bessent made clear that Europe is actively seeking to keep these talks moving. Bessent, who has extensive experience in this field, said the agreement isn’t out of reach. That cannot be ignored—it doesn’t guarantee action, but it does point to a belief among major financial voices that progress is still on the table.

For those of us keeping an eye on the implications in derivative markets, these back-and-forth motions suggest volatility rather than calm ahead. When tariff regimes are left in flux, pricing models need to adjust. Trade policy shifts affect input costs, output distributions, and thereby influence corporate earnings. That then moves indexes, and so the effect is felt widely across positions, especially in contracts that are sensitive to macroeconomic flow.

We must pay very close attention to not just whether 0-for-0 tariffs advance, but also to how discussions with key Asian counterparts evolve—India being the flag bearer at this stage. If a meaningful reduction in barriers is agreed upon, models that assume friction in supply chains might have to be rebalanced. There’s also the chance that retaliatory American moves could add another layer of complexity for instruments referencing manufacturing sectors in Europe.

What matters in the short term is how protectionist or outward-facing policies look to be moving in the next fortnight. Any discernible tilt will affect pricing assumptions. The interplay between regional earnings and FX adjustments also opens up questions about hedging and risk appetite. For now, whatever open positions we carry should factor in that policies can shift on headlines. Only strategies that can still stand if negotiations stall, or if talks open unexpectedly, are worth holding.

Monitor statements from trade and finance officials with particular focus on timing. Delay is common in such matters, but not always priced in. When momentum changes, so should your exposure.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Taiwanese dollar recently experienced a notable surge, accompanied by modest gains in other Asian currencies. This shift is driven by concerns among Taiwan’s USD-rich corporations about a potential trade deal with the US, though Taiwanese authorities have dismissed such speculation.

Liquidity issues may have intensified movements in the tightly controlled TWD, now trading 7% above its end-of-April close. With the USD declining, some countries with USD-denominated assets like Taiwan seek increased hedging and diversification from US investments.

The Fed Meeting Highlights

In the US, the focus is on the upcoming FOMC rate announcement. Expectations suggest Chairman Jerome Powell will continue to resist cutting rates despite external pressures, with consensus predicting a rate cut not occurring before September.

The Fed meeting might not drastically affect the dollar, aligned with Powell’s recent statements. Rebounding US equities have reduced USD premium demands, although the dollar remains undervalued compared to short-term rate differentials. Future USD risks from Asia persist, emphasizing the potential for speculative shorts to influence currency movements.

What we’re observing now is a reaction not just to local politics or rumoured trade accords, but to broader shifts in capital flow and protective positioning. The recent surge in the Taiwanese dollar, particularly the speed at which it appreciated, points to a concentration of market activity — a kind of scramble to reallocate out of the greenback, possibly to lock in gains or limit exposure to US-led monetary tightening. The fact that it’s trading 7% stronger relative to where it stood in late April gives us a sense that much of this shift is speculative, likely exacerbated by low market depth.

This is something worth watching closely. When a currency under a managed regime moves this sharply, it suggests bigger constraints on the typical levers of price discovery. Taiwanese corporates sitting on large stores of USD may see this as an opportunity to repatriate or shift out of dollar risk, especially if they sense local monetary authorities are letting some degree of appreciation through, rather than actively pushing against it. While policymakers have dismissed talk of trade-linked repositioning, we consider the reaction function of corporates to be more telling than official commentary in this scenario.

Looking westward, the Federal Reserve’s June meeting dominates the US monetary calendar. While no rate cut is anticipated at this stage — and Powell has made a point of maintaining a careful stance — the dovish pricing further out into September and beyond is already well reflected in dollar forward curves. This leaves the USD vulnerable to episodes of risk reversal, particularly if domestic data softens or equity valuations begin to wobble.

Exchange Rate Management Challenges

Although equities have rallied, which in turn dampens the safe-haven premium for the dollar, it’s important to remember the currency is still not capturing the entirety of the rate advantage the US holds. This mismatch between implied rates and the spot FX level opens the door to speculators positioning for a continuation of the medium-term dollar decline, especially against currencies backed by improving trade surpluses or credible central bank tightening cycles.

Asian central banks, meanwhile, face a delicate balance. Exchange rate management is becoming more complex amid diverging paths between US monetary policy and regional macro stability. Sharp FX gains, particularly when liquidity is thin, can invite unwelcome volatility. Should we experience more episodes like the one seen in Taiwan, it’s likely to prompt increased short-term interest in FX options and volatility products across the region.

What matters now is not just the rate messaging from Powell, but how the broader risk environment evolves in response. Those active in structured products or leveraged positions will need to monitor for sudden shifts in implied volatilities, especially if the dollar begins to trade noisily post-FOMC without clear direction. We’d expect near-term price action to stay reactive to positioning imbalances, especially on days when liquidity is low or data surprises hit outside US hours.

Lastly, the way hedge demand rotates out of dollar assets into local alternatives could add momentum to this trend if regional investors begin pre-empting US rate cuts. Diversification preferences may accelerate, leading to more complex trading patterns — ones where carry and correlation no longer move in lockstep. This is especially relevant in strategies involving currency overlays or cross-market intermediation. Keep an eye on real yield spreads across Asia versus the US — that’s where the next set of clues might rest.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Spain’s April services PMI registered at 53.4, lower than the expected 54.0, with the previous figure at 54.7. The composite PMI also decreased to 52.5 from 54.0.

This data indicates a slowdown, with diminishing new work growth over the month. Economic confidence has reached its lowest since November, and the service sector experienced weaker growth, while the manufacturing sector saw a decline in production.

International Market Tensions

Service providers faced a more challenging work environment, attributed to international market tensions impacting consumption and investment decisions. Despite the slowdown, business activity and order levels remain positive.

Operating costs for Spanish service providers are high, with trade tariffs impacting supply chains, leading to increased input prices and wages driving prices higher. Rising input costs are being transferred to customers.

Although optimism among Spanish service providers has declined to the lowest level this year due to uncertainties from US tariffs, this does not immediately affect Spanish workers. With continued order growth and increasing backlogs, service providers have expanded their workforces.

The recent data out of Spain, showing both services and composite PMIs slipping, paints a clear picture of moderation rather than contraction. What we are seeing is not a collapse in demand, but rather a gentle loss of speed—something more akin to a vehicle gradually decelerating than slamming on the brakes. The services PMI has inched beneath forecasts, while the composite has followed that downward drift, reinforcing the overall tone.

Falling Confidence Levels

A key point here is the mention of confidence levels falling to the lowest since November. That sort of timeline matters. Markets remember that period well—characterised not by chaos, but quiet hesitation amid global uncertainty. It suggests decision-makers have become more wary and less inclined to elevate risks in their portfolios. This change has not paralysed operations; ongoing order inflows and hiring underscore this. Yet a cautionary mood has clearly taken hold, and the numbers do not lie.

We should also keep a close eye on cost structures here. Service firms in Spain aren’t simply experiencing ordinary inflation. These pressures are notably tied to external frictions—most prominently, trade measures that have a direct influence on the price of inputs. As a result, providers are burdened with higher operational expenses, and because margins are not infinitely elastic, these costs are being passed along through price hikes. We cannot ignore this, particularly when monitoring longer-term inflation expectations.

Despite what appears to be a shift in forward sentiment, hiring has gone up. That detail should not be glossed over. Rising backlogs often lead to increased staffing, not out of expansionary ambition—but as a means of coping with work that continues to outpace current staffing levels. It’s a timing issue, where supply must rise to meet persistent though softening demand.

From our position, the data prompts a constructive reassessment of positions across duration-sensitive strategies. Yield sensitivity becomes critical when cost-push dynamics combine with slower activity, and even a mild slackening in service demand affects valuations. The weakening of manufacturing output, meanwhile, adds to the broader narrative that while domestic engines are running, they’re increasingly doing so against a backdrop of dampened global momentum.

Finally, if one reads between the numbers, there is no indication of systemic panic. Firms are hiring. Orders are growing. But the mood has cooled. Not frozen. Not fearful. Measured. That tone is the fulcrum on which expectations must now pivot.

We will watch for any divergence between pricing power and wage commitments in future releases, as that will influence not just inflationary pathways, but also profitability cycles for companies where input sensitivity remains high.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The USD/CAD pair may find support near the 1.3800 level as the 14-day Relative Strength Index hovers above 30, indicating bearish momentum. Currently trading around 1.3820, the pair shows a descending channel pattern on the daily chart, maintaining a bearish sentiment.

The USD/CAD is below the nine-day Exponential Moving Average, suggesting weak short-term momentum, though more price movement is needed to confirm a trend. If the pair breaks below the 1.3800 support, it could retest the seven-month low of 1.3760, close to the lower boundary of the channel.

Potential Support And Resistance Levels

A breach of the descending channel could push the USD/CAD towards the 1.3419 level, with more support near the channel’s lower boundary at 1.3320. On the upside, initial resistance lies at the nine-day EMA of 1.3837, with a breakout leading towards the 50-day EMA at 1.4058 and potential gains towards 1.4415.

The Canadian Dollar showed the strongest performance against the Australian Dollar compared to other major currencies. Against the USD, CAD increased by 0.02%, while against the AUD, it rose by 0.32%. Such data highlights fluctuating currency strengths.

Given the current technical setup and price behaviour, we’re seeing a pointed slowdown in bullish energy. The USD/CAD remains under pressure within a narrowing structure — a descending channel that continues to guide the directional bias. We’ve got RSI readings floating just above the oversold range, which tends to ease any panic but still reflects heavier selling interest than buying enthusiasm. We’re not in oversold territory yet, but we’re dangerously close.

Current Market Sentiment

Price action dancing just around 1.3820 suggests that any dip lower might open the gates to that 1.3800 level — a threshold we should pay close attention to. That level isn’t just a number; it’s technically loaded. It’s acted as a springboard before. If enough weight is thrown at it and it gives way, there’s little standing in the way of a retest of 1.3760. That level lines up with the lower end of the channel and would be critical in measuring how far this bearish structure still has to run.

Now, looking lower than 1.3760, if price doesn’t stabilise there, we’d likely be forced to re-evaluate the broader structural integrity of the move since January. The next stops, as we’ve mapped out in earlier weeks, would be closer to 1.3419 and possibly stretching to 1.3320 — both being historically relevant and recently active zones that have caught directional swings before.

On the resistance side, unless there’s a decisive break higher through the 9-day EMA at 1.3837, upside attempts are likely to fizzle out rather than flourish. That main dynamic resistance has curbed rallies repeatedly, and tonight’s reluctance to clear it tells us something’s still weighing. If it *does* get cleared with conviction, then the 50-day EMA becomes the next logical magnet, sitting at 1.4058. Beyond that, if bears lose further pace, longer-term sentiment will hinge on whether bulls can even dream of revisiting the 1.4415 region — last seen when USD strength dominated broadly.

Outside of charts and candles, we’ve also tracked relative currency moves — CAD has outpaced AUD more clearly than USD this week, gaining 0.32% versus a mere 0.02% against the greenback. That kind of performance matters in short-term spreads and correlation plays, especially when one currency shows strength across multiple pairings. From our side, we continue to compare cross performance in majors to layer that against the broader directional argument.

This isn’t a moment to jump the gun. Until the pair either finds firmer ground at a lower support or breaks out of this channel with real follow-through, tactical range-bound strategy remains the default. We prefer tight positioning, watching RSI, support-resistance pivots, and how price behaves near those EMAs. A busy few sessions ahead — no time for guesswork.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Market Hesitation

European indices remained relatively stable at the start of the day. Broader markets are in a holding pattern, largely in anticipation of developments in trade discussions.

S&P 500 futures have declined by 0.3% following a recent drop. This comes after nine consecutive days of increases. Currently, markets are pausing until the next major news about tariffs and trade emerges. Prolonged uncertainty may lead to increased apprehension.

That opening summary signals a collective hesitation across markets, with risk appetite cooling slightly due to the absence of clear catalysts. European equities holding their ground implies that large investors are not rushing to reprice expectations just yet—but they aren’t leaning into fresh positions either. In simple terms, the market’s appetite for taking on more exposure is being tempered by a wait-and-see approach, tied chiefly to the next development in trade conversations.

Futures on the S&P 500 sliding by 0.3% marks a modest shift, but it carries weight when viewed in context. The decline follows an extended rally—nine straight sessions in the green—which suggests that some positioning was perhaps overly optimistic or at least dialing into an ideal scenario that hasn’t yet arrived. That stretch of gains has been interrupted not by bad news, but by a vacuum. It’s an important distinction.

Powell’s comments at the last press conference hinted at a conducting approach that remains largely patient, more reactive than predictive at this point. Thus, traders aren’t receiving firm directional cues from monetary policy either. That likely explains part of the calm, both in terms of volatility metrics and market breadth. And so, there’s little to suggest a strong conviction in either direction right now.

Market Uncertainty

From our perspective, what we’re seeing is a market temporarily trapped—slightly uneasy yet not quite alarmed. When you strip it down, there is enough geopolitical uncertainty to prevent risk exposure from climbing meaningfully higher. However, that same hesitancy is paired with the underlying resilience of recent economic data in some sectors, which continues to act as a counterbalance.

Volatility products remain subdued, but this could change quickly if trade headlines break decisively in either direction. Market makers and short-term futures participants would benefit from preparing tactical plays around headline-driven swings, especially since volumes tend to thin out during indecisive phases like this. Options order flow, if watched closely, may provide a cleaner signal than fundamentals for the next week or two.

Much of the action now hangs on timing—when negotiators will break the silence, and if there’s any real movement behind the posturing. Until then, the focus may lean slightly on incoming economic markers and forward-looking indicators tied to manufacturing and services sentiment.

We’ve seen this type of pause before. It’s not a new pattern, but a familiar lull that usually precedes either a resumption of trend or a sharp reversal. One can’t yet say which, but what’s clear is that the market isn’t going anywhere quickly until something outside the current loop breaks through. The time to observe and plan more tightly may be now.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Pound Sterling (GBP) shows a tentative downward momentum against the US Dollar (USD), though a drop to 1.3230 is unlikely. In the longer term, there is space for GBP to continue its pullback, but reaching the major support of 1.3160 remains uncertain.

Currently, GBP is trading with a downward bias despite a recent 0.23% increase to end at 1.3297. Resistance is observed at 1.3300 and 1.3330, while the major support level at 1.3160 is not anticipated to be affected immediately.

GBP Pullback Analysis

In the upcoming weeks, the pullback from the high of 1.3445 has not gained much momentum. There is potential for a continued pullback, although breaching 1.3360 would suggest that GBP might not retreat further. Proper research should be conducted before making any investment decisions due to inherent risks and uncertainties in dealing with financial markets.

This analysis reflects a market where the GBP has shown a gentle lean downwards but, for now, lacks the strength to push aggressively lower. It’s important to understand that although the shorter-term chart suggests softness, the recent move up to around 1.3300 hints at a pocket of underlying support. Still, unless the price convincingly reclaims levels beyond 1.3360, this recent bounce should be seen in context of a retracement rather than the start of a fresh rally.

The broader tone, marked by limited traction in the pullback from the peak at 1.3445, points to a market that may still be consolidating rather than breaking into a new trend. The 1.3160 level sits much lower as a key technical floor, but movement towards it needs either a catalyst or a breakdown in current structural support—a scenario that’s yet to emerge.

Derivatives And Risk Management

Traders in derivatives, particularly those operating in short-dated contracts or leveraged positions, should stay attuned to these levels. The short-term resistance at 1.3300 and again near 1.3330 acts more as reference points for potential exhaustion rather than breakout markers. If spot price fails to move decisively beyond these areas on repeated tests, it enhances the case for tactical short setups with close-in risk parameters.

If price breaches 1.3360, however, that level holds weight—it effectively neutralises short-side bias and could squeeze out remaining bearish positions. For now, we remain operating within a corrective range, where measured positioning around these pivot zones, rather than directional certainty, is the more balanced approach.

This also serves as a reminder to avoid leaning too heavily into one-sided exposure, especially in the absence of momentum. Sentiment can appear fragile even when technicals seem clean, and price can stall or whip unpredictably. This is where we pay closer attention to implied volatility and rate differentials when constructing spreads or options structures, looking for confirmation from macro indicators beyond just spot charts.

Much will also depend on upcoming economic data and how rate expectations shift in response. Markets have not fully committed to a direction yet, and until they do, our focus remains on monitoring rejections around resistance and holding a flexible mindset near support.

In current conditions, it’s not about forecasting exact price targets — it’s more about recognising when market structure is shifting and adjusting exposure accordingly. This keeps risk manageable, especially in a period when momentum has subdued and breakout potential feels limited pending fresh catalysts.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Today’s schedule includes a few low-tier data releases. In the European session, final PMI readings for the UK and Eurozone will be released.

The American session features a 10-year auction for those interested. A key event is the Trump-Carney meeting at 11:45 ET/15:45 GMT, which will focus on tariff-related discussions.

Anticipation For Potential Trade Deals

There is anticipation for potential trade deals, as US officials have suggested that an announcement could happen this week.

The initial portion outlines a day quiet in terms of high-tier economic indicators, with final Purchasing Managers’ Index figures due from both the UK and Eurozone. These are backward-looking figures that typically confirm prior estimates, offering limited room for fresh volatility unless the revisions are substantial. As we have seen in prior releases, a large positive surprise might briefly jolt short-term rates markets, but otherwise the implications tend to be minor.

Over in the US, the Treasury will hold a 10-year bond auction. This is one of the more commonly followed issuance events, particularly as it falls mid-curve and often reflects broader investor appetite. If demand turns out soft—perhaps indicated by a tail above the when-issued yield or lower bid-to-cover ratios—then we may see a move higher in yields, especially if paired with light flows due to the data-light schedule.

The planned meeting between Trump and Carney later in the US morning is being watched closely, not because any formal policy changes are expected immediately, but because of the potential for market-moving headlines. The focus appears to be tariffs—always a sensitive topic—and even a minor shift in tone could ripple across futures pricing. It’s also worth noting the background chatter: certain trade representatives on the American side are hinting there’s a deal brewing, perhaps sooner than markets assumed.

Market Reactions And Strategy

With calendar risk sharply weighted toward a single geopolitical development, any unexpected outcome would likely spill into implied vol across equity and fixed-income options. We’ve noted before that thinner participation during low-tier sessions tends to amplify reactions to external shocks.

Therefore, in the short term, we should be prepared for intraday swings that are not necessarily rooted in scheduled data but rather in headline risks. Short-dated options may offer opportunities here, especially with IV still modest. Gamma remains in focus.

Choosing to remain nimble but reactive is suitable under these conditions. Observing the vol surface post-auction and staying alert for updates following the tariff dialogue could allow us to refine exposure in either direction. There’s no merit in overcommitting early, but being quick to react is likely the better play in the current setting.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Japanese Yen (JPY) has gained ground against the US Dollar (USD) for the third day in a row. This rise is supported by recent events including the Bank of Japan’s (BoJ) dovish stance and worldwide economic uncertainties. Analysts anticipate that the BoJ could increase interest rates again in 2025, amidst concerns about US President Donald Trump’s trade strategies and elevated geopolitical risks.

The BoJ has lowered its growth and inflation forecasts, delaying expectations of a rate hike. Despite this, the JPY benefits from its reputation as a safe-haven currency amid global tensions. These include recent drone strikes on Moscow by Ukraine and a conflict involving Israel and the Houthi movement.

Resilient Us Economy

Trump has suggested potential trade agreements and possible tariff reductions on China, while the US Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reported growth in the US services sector. This reflects a resilient US labour market, which supports the USD ahead of a significant Federal Reserve meeting.

Technically, the USD/JPY pair shows potential for further decline. Traders react cautiously, suggesting any recovery might attract selling interest, especially if the price approaches the 144.25-144.30 zone. A break below current levels could push the pair towards lower support areas.

The Japanese Yen’s recent three-day upswing against the Dollar didn’t occur in isolation, and much of its energy seems to come from a complex mix of policy signals out of Tokyo and broader geopolitical instability. With the Bank of Japan toning down its inflation and growth projections, markets are now looking further out—perhaps towards 2025—for the next step higher in Japanese interest rates. This shift in expectations has helped to steady the Yen, even as it keeps rates below most global peers.

We’ve also seen renewed market interest in the Yen as headlines grow more tense. The drone attacks around Moscow and the increasing unrest linked to the Houthi group have served as reminders that risk remains very much alive, supporting currencies historically seen as more stable when global conditions deteriorate. That bias won’t disappear overnight, especially as fresh developments are likely in the coming weeks.

Shifting Global Dynamics

Despite adjustments in Tokyo, the Dollar found underlying strength from continued growth in US services and strong hiring trends. Nonetheless, price action suggests that caution is quietly building ahead of what’s likely to be a much-watched statement from US policymakers. The current rangebound behaviour could break meaningfully if interest rate guidance shifts or if there’s an unexpected change in tone.

Trump’s recent remarks on relaxing tariffs toward China stirred short-term optimism, but markets seem unsure how deeply those intentions will go, or how quickly they might be enacted. That type of unpredictability naturally feeds into defensive posturing in the short term. While some might read his stance as supportive for global trade, uncertainty remains, and currency positioning has become correspondingly more tentative.

Technically speaking, the Dollar appears vulnerable at the moment. We’ve been observing increased sensitivity to movements near the 144.25–144.30 band. Traders continue to treat rallies towards these levels with suspicion, and sell-side strategies remain favoured unless new data clearly shifts momentum. We expect stop placements below current support to trigger if breached, which would open up further downside risk, pulling the pair towards lower technical shelves previously tested earlier in the year.

In the absence of new rate guidance from the BoJ and with the US Fed nearing its next announcement, near-term trading is likely to remain headline-driven, shaped by any shifts in safe-haven appetite or sudden changes in rate assumptions. Until then, tactical plays look more favourable than directional conviction. Moves into higher resistance areas should continue to attract hesitant sellers, particularly as longer-term structure still leans towards consolidation rather than breakout.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.