Gold prices are on the rise, trading at approximately $3,396 per ounce, with a 1.90% increase today and a 4.5% increase over the week. Global instability, including tensions in the Middle East and trade policy uncertainties, is driving demand for Gold as a defence against economic instability and a weakening US Dollar.

US trade measures, including tariffs on foreign films and pharmaceutical restrictions, have sparked trade conflict fears, prompting European retaliatory actions. Concerns about disrupted supply chains and increased economic uncertainties are promoting Gold as a safeguard against broader market stress.

Geopolitical Uncertainties

Geopolitical uncertainties in Europe, such as electoral losses in Germany and potential early elections, are contributing to risk concerns. Additionally, high-level talks between Canadian and US leaders, while not directly affecting Gold, reflect broader diplomatic challenges affecting market dynamics.

The Federal Reserve is anticipated to maintain interest rates, with forthcoming guidance potentially influencing Gold’s trajectory. Positive Gold momentum is evident, with a breakthrough of the 14.14% Fibonacci retracement level suggesting potential to reach $3,500.

Central banks, major Gold holders, added 1,136 tonnes worth $70 billion in 2022, the highest on record. They view Gold as a safeguard during economic turbulence, diversifying reserves to bolster economic and currency strength.

These latest developments reflect a clear and measurable shift in investor behaviour, particularly in terms of how risk is being assessed in the current climate. Spot prices for Gold climbing past $3,396 per ounce, buoyed by strong weekly gains, indicate that markets are seeking safety with renewed urgency. This pattern isn’t just speculative—it’s underpinned by a mix of political instability, monetary caution, and currency vulnerability.

Trade Policy Impact

We’ve noticed that key policy announcements out of Washington, particularly in trade and pharmaceutical sectors, are disrupting established expectations. The recent tariffs affecting film distribution and medicine markets aren’t merely symbolic acts of protectionism. They introduce friction, which distorts trade flows and elevates logistical uncertainty. European reactions have been swift, and with that come worries about cross-border agreement breakdowns and retaliatory escalations.

Electoral turbulence in parts of Western Europe, particularly Germany, adds another dimension to the general sense of unease. Early elections can’t be ruled out, and even the possibility has already registered in asset volatility. While the diplomatic meetings between Canada and the US may appear routine, the subtext is anything but relaxed—conversations hint at larger disagreements under the surface, ones that can ripple through markets without immediate headlines.

Gold’s breakthrough of the 14.14% Fibonacci retracement is more than a technical footnote. It’s a roadmap indicating strong follow-through buying interest. If price activity respects that level as support going forward, then reaching $3,500 is not overly optimistic as a mid-term reference point. That said, we’re not just watching price—volume has grown in tandem, reinforcing the legitimacy of this move rather than chalking it up to short bursts of speculative push.

In terms of monetary policy, while the Federal Reserve is expected to hold its current rate, the market will treat any accompanying statements with heightened sensitivity. Traders will likely pay more attention to the tone and language of the Fed’s forward guidance than to the rate decision itself. Expectation anchoring will get tested. Any suggestion of dovish thinking, even indirect, may further support non-yielding assets like Gold.

Looking beyond private market activity, central banks remain heavy hitters in this space. When they increased Gold holdings by over 1,100 tonnes in 2022, it wasn’t about fine-tuning portfolios; it was a calibrated response to currency strain and declining trust in fiat stability. That pattern, while not necessarily continuing at the same volume, has laid the groundwork for stronger institutional floors under spot prices.

What this means more broadly is that we’re seeing measured repositioning among those managing derivatives exposure. Rather than assuming rapid mean reversion, pricing is now adjusting more conservatively—volatility being priced in deliberately. For positioning strategies, this suggests trimming short Gold exposure and reassessing hedges that may have assumed geopolitical calm. Timing matters less right now than structure.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Gold has risen for the second consecutive day, increasing by $80 to reach $3112. The resurgence of gold purchasers followed a holiday in China and other Asian regions.

Yesterday, gold experienced a notable rise with an outside bullish reversal, which extended today, suggesting a strong upward trend. If current levels hold at market close, it would be the second-highest closing, just $10 below the peak achieved on April 21.

Key Level To Monitor

A key level to monitor is $3500, where gold met resistance on April 22, resulting in a round of profit-taking. This was during a period of optimism concerning U.S. trade negotiations. However, it seems that these talks have recently slowed, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirming a pause in U.S.-China communications.

Trade negotiations appear stalled, and the market is eager for concrete results rather than just discussions. President Trump addressed frustrations over the timing of trade agreements, stating, “we’re going to put down the price people have to pay to shop in the United States.” He assured that the anticipated figures would be fair without negatively impacting any country.

In line with a rebound in stock markets, Trump’s confidence appears boosted.

What the current movement in gold tells us is clear: investor behaviour continues to be led by tangible geopolitical developments, not hopeful sentiment. The sharp $80 rally across two sessions, reaching $3112, is not noise—it reflects actual adjustments in positioning following days of subdued activity, particularly across Asian markets paused for holiday. It’s not merely a reaction to time away; rather, it suggests strong buying interests were queued up, waiting for the activity to resume.

Momentum And Market Sentiment

The outside bullish reversal seen yesterday carries weight. Historically, these kinds of reversals, especially when followed by immediate gains, suggest that sell-off pressure has exhausted—for now. The fact that gold extended higher today lends conviction to that signal. If prices close where they are now, only $10 below the highest price seen so far this year, it points to a market returning with intent.

Now, $3500 remains a pressure point. It’s not just a round number drawn from sentiment. That’s where sellers stepped in on April 22 when enthusiasm around trade negotiations gave way to short-term exits. What mattered then, and should continue to be watched, is how quickly profit-taking appears once sentiment shifts. Traders seeking upside may watch whether demand can sustain above $3112 first and then notice whether volume builds when approaching that April high.

Comments from Bessent confirmed something we’d already assumed: official communication lines between the U.S. and China are colder than before. This isn’t background noise either. When trade prospects chill, the appeal of safe-haven assets like gold typically gets bolstered—not because investors speculate blindly, but because they want to preserve capital amid ambiguity.

Trump’s positioning seems aimed at reassuring markets—using phrases like “price people have to pay” suggests a focus on domestic affordability while avoiding direct confrontation. It’s a balancing act. Traders might interpret the message not as a sign of aggressive policy change, but rather as a delay, with more waiting likely. And in this environment, any asset that doesn’t rely on policy timing can gain appeal.

With equities also rebounding, confidence looks mildly restored—for now. But what stands out today is not a lift across all risk assets; it’s that gold saw a deliberate continuation higher, not just a tag-along uplift. The second consecutive rise confirms willingness among participants to pay a premium even while risk markets also rise.

From what we see, focus should be directed toward watching whether this momentum remains sustained through the week’s close—and if price action starts to build steadily above recent resistance levels. We’re not just seeing event-driven moves; we’re watching which positions are being held, and which ones are fading quietly.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The US dollar is losing ground as funds are redirected to Asia, particularly after a notable 6% increase in the Taiwan dollar and strong performances in the Korean won, Chinese yuan, and Thai baht. This shift occurs as the US faces slowing economic growth and inconsistent trade policies, putting ongoing pressure on the dollar.

Currency appreciation in Taiwan and other Asian economies may be a strategy to alleviate trade tensions with the US. The Singapore dollar and Malaysian ringgit have also strengthened due to increased capital flow into the region, countering a typical trend where Asian currencies depreciate during trade disputes.

Analysts Perspectives

There is no new information regarding tariffs, aside from US tariffs on foreign filmmakers, but overall trade tensions remain. Analysts suggest Asia may be more comfortable with stronger currencies now, as regional trade and commerce grow.

Market focus includes the upcoming FOMC meeting for potential hints of interest rate cuts later in the year. The Bank of England is set to meet as well, with expectations of maintaining current rates but providing insights on future monetary policy amid differing global central bank strategies.

The initial passage lays out a shift in capital movements where investors have been reallocating funds away from the US dollar and into Asian currencies. This reaction stems from a combination of slower economic output in the US, patchy trade policy signals, and a changing global risk appetite. A standout detail is the appreciation of the Taiwan dollar by 6%, with similar upward moves being seen in the Korean won, Chinese yuan, and Thai baht. These shifts are not led by central bank interventions alone, but more likely by broader confidence in Asia’s economic position and its increasing internal trade strength.

Reading further, strength in the Singapore dollar and Malaysian ringgit isn’t coincidental, as these currencies usually drift lower during times of trade hostilities. Now, however, we’re seeing the opposite—money is flowing in, not out. That’s telling. It reflects a changing idea among global investors: that Asian economies may weather fragmented trade press better, or at least act more independently of Western central bank cycles.

Currency Positioning and Trade Disputes

There’s no fresh data on broader tariff action—apart from some measures involving foreign film studios—but the sense that global trade disputes are alive and unresolved continues to shape currency positioning. Importantly, it’s implied that Asian governments may now be less resistant to local currency strength, preferring it perhaps as a tool to ease external pressure or as an internal hedge amidst stronger trade within the region.

Looking ahead, we’re all watching the Federal Reserve’s upcoming meeting for any mention of dovish turns. Even subtle shifts in tone around interest rates could influence volatility expectations. Powell and colleagues don’t have much room to move if inflation data trends sideways again. Markets are beginning to price in cuts later in the year, but the path won’t be straight.

At the same time, the Bank of England gears up for a rate decision of its own. Current forecasts point towards a no-change, yet the language around inflation outlook and labour data could reframe timing for any easing path. Bailey’s stance will also matter simply because global policy moves have become less synchronised.

For those operating in short-dated interest rate derivatives or regional FX options, some rebalancing towards tighter delta exposure in Asian pairs now appears warranted. We’ve seen long volatility positions fade in the euro-dollar lately; comparatively, the vols in the offshore yuan and won are catching lift. That shift is measurable, and it implies risk budgets are being recalibrated eastward with conviction rather than caution.

From our end, it may be time to re-examine spread skews tied to Asia-linked pairs versus dollar crosses, which no longer mirror previous beta relationships. With Fed and BoE outlooks now diverging in messaging, that mispricing window could shorten within the month. The tone in swap markets has already edged towards this, and it wouldn’t take much in the next FOMC communication to extend that trend.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The GDPNow model estimates the real GDP growth for the second quarter of 2025 at 2.2 percent as of May 6. This is an increase from the previous estimate of 1.1 percent on May 1.

Recent data releases from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, the US Census Bureau, and the US Bureau of Economic Analysis have affected the model. The nowcasts for second-quarter real personal consumption expenditures growth rose from 1.9 percent to 3.3 percent, while real private fixed investment growth increased from 1.3 percent to 3.6 percent.

Gdpnow Update Schedule

The GDPNow update is scheduled for Thursday, May 8. This update may further adjust these projections based on new economic data.

Put simply, the GDPNow forecast picked up pace. Within just five days, the real GDP growth estimate for Q2 2025 doubled from 1.1% to 2.2%, a shift driven largely by improved expectations around household spending and business investment. The model responds immediately to fresh data, and those inputs—especially on consumption and fixed investment—have shown stronger activity than expected.

Personal consumption expenditures, which play an outsized role in driving GDP, are now forecast to grow by 3.3% instead of 1.9%. This means consumers have either continued spending through economic uncertainty, or recent wage trends and employment conditions have provided a cushion against cost pressures. That adjustment alone added notable weight to the GDP estimate. Fixed investment didn’t trail far behind. It jumped from an earlier estimate of 1.3% growth to 3.6% in a matter of days. This reflects more robust capital expenditure by private firms, possibly in construction, equipment, or intellectual property products. When businesses increase investment, it can suggest not only confidence in future demand but also a need to expand capacity now, not later. So we take it seriously when that figure shifts sharply.

For those of us tracking derivative markets, moves like these don’t just suggest that risk appetite is changing—they tell us where that appetite is being aimed. Stronger-than-expected consumer spending and business investment feed into inflation considerations, interest rate expectations, and ultimately market volatility.

Market Implications

Powell’s Fed is on watch: this sort of growth momentum is unlikely to pass unnoticed. A 3.3% rise in consumption implies inflation pressures may linger, even if headline prices moderate. If investment continues to accelerate, borrowing costs matter more. Forward rate pricing may react accordingly. That leaves us with a market finely attuned to short-term moves in economic trajectories. Rates trades may become more directional. Swaps spreads could widen. And vol sellers might need to be nimble.

Burns may view this as a warning shot for strategies built on a soft landing being delivered neatly. For us, the response cannot be passive. It would be unwise to maintain high convexity exposure without factoring in the rate-anchoring effect a stronger Q2 may eliminate. Models assuming a steady, predictable slowdown will need to be rebalanced quickly as new consumption and investment figures revise estimates upwards.

More data will land before the May 8 model update, and that will add more weight. But even before then, the direction is clear. Q2 performance is running hotter. If you’re set up assuming softness, this is a point to consider increasing hedge roll-down or reassessing the slope of rate curves you’re positioned on. Treasury volatility isn’t dead, and this revision could be the beginning of a more active spell than what we saw in the first quarter.

There’s been a sharp change in just a handful of days. We don’t have the luxury to wait and see if it settles down. Reaction time becomes a strategy of its own.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Swiss franc has shown strong performance since April 2, when it gained over 7% against the USD. Despite this, Swiss inflation remains soft, with April CPI showing no y/y change and core inflation dropping to 0.6% y/y. This low inflation is challenging for the SNB, which has already reduced rates to 0.25%. The SNB may further cut rates, expecting a 40 basis point reduction, which would return them to negative territory.

In contrast, the CHF is currently underperforming compared to the JPY, a top G10 currency today. As for the euro, its recent strength is under scrutiny due to economic challenges and potential ECB rate cuts. EUR/USD, which recently neared 1.1573, has tested below the 1.13 level. The currency reflects market optimism around US trade deals but faces pressure from trade tensions and potential ECB actions. Market expectations include an ECB rate reduction in June, and EUR/USD is projected to be 1.15 over a 12-month period.

Investment Risks

Readers are reminded that financial markets are inherently risky, and all investment decisions should be carefully assessed for risks and uncertainties without any guarantee of accuracy or timeliness of the information provided.

At present, the underlying theme remains one of diverging policy paths. The Swiss franc has rallied strongly against the US dollar since early April—a move largely driven not by domestic strength, but rather by shifting global rate expectations. While the SNB has taken the initial step with its rate cut to 0.25%, inflation in Switzerland is still lacklustre. April figures showed no headline increase at all, and core inflation has given way to just 0.6% on an annual basis. This seeping softness in price growth leaves room for further dovish action. We now observe market pricing leaning towards at least one more cut, possibly pushing real rates more deeply into negative territory.

However, despite this accommodation from the central bank, the franc’s upward trend has not faltered much, helped by safe-haven flows during broader risk-off episodes. This is where the challenge begins—rate expectations and currency strength are pushing in opposite directions. For those involved in directional strategies, the strength of CHF looks increasingly difficult to rationalise through a purely monetary lens. The pricing asymmetry can, at some point, correct sharply should risk sentiment shift or central bank communication become explicitly more forceful.

Turning attention to Europe, Lagarde’s team faces a different sort of pressure. The euro has tried to hold its ground, even momentarily brushing up against the 1.1570 area before pulling back. But strong resistance remains, and technicals continue to show waning bullish momentum. Inflation dynamics in the eurozone are tilted lower, and the ECB appears more willing than skeptical to proceed with a rate cut as early as June. It’s worth recalling that such policy easing comes not from systemic weakness, but rather from a desire to pre-empt further slowdown.

Euro And Yen Performance

We see the 12-month forecast for EUR/USD touching 1.15, but more immediately, every bounce seems to fade under headline risk—especially from energy volatility, regional fundamentals, and cross-Atlantic data surprises. For positioning, there is increasing tension in medium-term long euro trades without strong conviction behind them. Option skews have begun to reflect more protective demand, indicating that traders prefer owning downside cover rather than chasing upside breakout scenarios.

Meanwhile, the yen, gaining more interest, has quietly outpaced both the franc and euro in relative strength terms during the past week. This isn’t an invitation to assume linear continuation, but it underscores the renewed focus on divergent real yields and policy patience from Tokyo, leaving the currency as one of the more attractive hedges in uncertain times.

In the coming sessions, volatility should stay elevated particularly into upcoming central bank meetings and as market participants reassess growth indicators. From our vantage point, spreads and rate differentials continue to exert strong influence over price action, while sentiment instruments such as risk reversals suggest that demand for downside protection in euro and franc positions is growing. Portfolio-level adjustments seem increasingly consistent with a broader defensive reassessment.

Guided by the last several weeks of moves and how pricing has realigned, one would do well to treat carry exposure with greater selectivity, recalibrating risk thresholds tightly. Dislocations from monetary policy shifts now matter more than directional calls on growth per se, and this will show up further in volatility curves across currency pairs.

The focus now should be on timing shifts and expectation management. No single factor will drive the next major trend, but when rate paths, relative inflation gauges, and geopolitical catalysts all start leaning in the same direction, responses can be swift and extended.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

USD/CAD is currently at the lower end of a 150-pip range, which has been in place since 15 April. The currency’s movement may respond to discussions and comments emerging from the Trump-Carney meeting today.

The meeting signifies the first interaction between the two newly-elected leaders. It remains uncertain when they will provide press statements, but it typically follows established protocol.

Currency Pair Movement Analysis

This article outlines that the USD/CAD currency pair has been moving within a confined 150-pip band since mid-April, and it’s now pressing against the lower portion of that range. That’s meaningful because it indicates limited change in pricing momentum over several weeks, with the market likely respecting underlying support and resistance levels. The mention of the recent Trump-Carney meeting introduces a possible catalyst for movement—political developments that could influence monetary direction or trade policy expectations on both sides of the border.

Now, with price near the bottom of its range, there’s a likelihood of increased sensitivity to headlines or unexpected remarks from either party. Though no official time has been announced, protocol suggests press statements are traditionally released shortly after formal bilateral meetings. Markets sometimes react prior to the statement if reporters or advisors leak initial sentiments from the discussion, especially if those hint at future economic cooperation or divergence.

Given where the pair is trading, it makes sense to be alert for a bounce or potential breakdown. Price action around the lower edge of a well-established range often invites speculation about whether support will persist. Volumes in recent sessions have been low, yet there appears increased positioning in short-term contracts, likely from those front-running possible volatility off the back of any politically-driven surprises.

We’ve also noticed implied volatility creeping up in the options market, particularly around the one-week tenor. This often aligns with anticipated events. That would reflect a growing sense among participants that rate commentary or trade policy tweaks might leave the cross more vulnerable than usual.

Market Sentiments and Potential Moves

Price is currently trading not far above the base built around late April support levels. If we see clear rejection at those levels again, and no disruptive remarks come out of the bilateral talk, then we may see renewed interest to test the upper band. Should the tone emerge as more combative or less cooperative than expected, downward extension becomes more plausible, and as a community, we’re likely to price that in swiftly.

Near-term traders should consider how tightly defined ranges often lead to sharp moves when eventually broken. There’s little merit in assuming this one will hold forever. Monitoring real-time headlines and preparing to adjust positions remains critical, especially as correlated markets like crude oil and the US dollar index have also shown signs of tightening.

We are paying particular attention to forward guidance embedded within upcoming central bank communications, especially given the policy leanings associated with Carney’s prior academic work. Should a delay in public commentary continue beyond expectations, markets may grow more jumpy, increasing the chance of exaggerated moves in thin liquidity windows.

Timing remains everything. The absence of a confirmed statement hour means attention should shift to unofficial remarks and reporter briefings. Those often move the needle well before press releases arrive. Watch trading volumes for confirmation.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Pound Sterling displays strength as it approaches key central bank decisions this week. The Bank of England (BoE) is anticipated to reduce interest rates on Thursday, with expectations of accelerated policy easing and lowered GDP growth prospects. The Federal Reserve is expected to maintain interest rates on Wednesday.

GBP/USD climbs to near 1.3390 as the US Dollar weakens. The US Dollar Index, tracking the Greenback against six major currencies, declines below 99.50. The FedWatch tool indicates an almost certain decision to keep borrowing rates steady at 4.25%-4.50%, marking the third straight meeting with unchanged rates.

Pound Sterling Trades Strongly Against Major Currencies

The Pound Sterling trades strongly against major currencies as the BoE’s rate decision looms, expected to cut rates by 25 basis points to 4.25%. This would mark the fourth interest rate cut in their current cycle since August. Market experts predict further cuts, focusing on the impact of US-imposed tariffs.

US President Trump’s economic policies, like new tariffs, are cautioned to potentially harm economic growth. Yet, US Treasury officials express confidence in their potential for boosting growth and reducing the trade deficit. Regarding technical analysis, the Pound Sterling remains above all major Exponential Moving Averages, indicating a bullish outlook. Key resistance and support levels are identified for the GBP/USD.

This week, with attention turning to monetary policy across the Atlantic, we’ve seen Sterling firm up impressively, particularly in its pairing with the Dollar. That movement isn’t occurring in a vacuum. The Bank of England is widely expected to lower interest rates, carving another 25 basis points off the current rate, which should bring it down to 4.25%. This would extend its string of cuts since last summer. In line with that, market participants are already pricing in the likelihood of more monetary easing through the coming quarters.

It’s not just speculation. Updated economic projections from the UK suggest slowing output, with revised GDP expectations pointing toward flatter growth. The BoE has taken note of mounting risks, not only from domestic spending constraints but also lingering global pressures, particularly those tied to trade dynamics and tighter financial conditions abroad. Those easing prospects seem to have bolstered Sterling’s relative appeal, as asset managers readjust expectations around where yields may be headed.

Federal Reserve Remains in Pause Mode

On the other side, the Federal Reserve remains in pause mode. Futures markets imply nearly unanimous belief that borrowing costs in the United States will stay within the current range of 4.25% to 4.50% this week. We’ve already seen the US Dollar Index move downward, as safe-haven demand for the Greenback tapers off on the back of unchanged Fed policy and less hawkish commentary from central bank officials.

Looking at the broader currency action, GBP/USD has touched levels just shy of 1.3390. This reflects a two-fold driver: not only Sterling strength but also underlying Dollar weakness. Cross-asset signals have confirmed a bullish stance—Sterling remains above its major exponential moving averages across various timeframes. From our experience, that tends to support trend continuation patterns rather than short-term reversals.

Resistance is seen near 1.3415, with a clear support band just under the 1.3285 mark. For those dealing in options or leveraged exposure, the current trend channel suggests opportunities exist for measured entries near support on pullbacks, provided macro drivers don’t shift materially.

Trade-related developments in the US still deserve close attention. The White House’s latest efforts to pressure trading partners through tariff adjustments are creating ripples. While economic officials in the Treasury remain publicly optimistic about the benefits of such measures—citing boosts to domestic producers—analysts have been less convinced, especially as forward-looking surveys hint at slowing manufacturing data.

It bears watching whether the White House stance prompts any longer-term reaction from corporate earnings or import-sensitive sectors. For now, however, these external factors seem to be helping Sterling rather than hurting it, at least in perception.

From a positioning standpoint, flow data show a gradual rotation into Pound-denominated assets. This may reflect a macro preference for undervalued currencies with some monetary space left to ease further. While the BoE risks cutting into a slowing economy, the perception of a still-manageable inflation situation adds to the narrative that easing now may not come at a cost to credibility.

In such cycles, timing matters. Traders may want to keep closer tabs on the forward curve in short sterling futures and swap spreads. Any widening between UK and US rates, even by a small margin, could fuel more directional moves. This would align well with continued buying interest above key trend supports.

We remain attentive to revised inflation prints and wage data coming out later in the month, which may affirm or weaken the central bank’s dovish lean. Until then, strength in Sterling appears to rest on clear technical foundations, supported by expectations that rate paths are diverging more visibly in the short term.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq indices experienced modest selling pressure today. However, the indices found support near key technical levels, which stabilised the declines.

The S&P 500 Index saw an intraday low of 5586.04, slightly above the 50-hour moving average of 5583.09. This moving average acted as support, maintaining a short-term upward trend. A fall below this could lead to selling, targeting the 50% retracement level of the March-April decline around 5491.24.

Nasdaq Composite Index Analysis

The Nasdaq Composite Index dropped to a session low of 17,592. Yet, buyers maintained support against the 50-hour moving average at 17,573. A dip below this average could result in a deeper decline, with the next support level at the 50% midpoint from the mid-December high, now at 17,494.131.

Today’s market behaviour indicates that despite the pullback, there is still interest from buyers at these levels. The 50-hour moving averages serve as critical short-term risk metrics for both indices. A consistent drop below these averages might signal a shift in short-term momentum towards further declines.

This article explores short-term price behaviour in two widely followed U.S. equity benchmarks. Both indices—the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite—experienced intraday selling, yet found stability around technical markers used by many traders to gauge momentum and direction. For both, the 50-hour moving average provided temporary relief from selling, suggesting that buyers stepped in at these levels, unwilling to let momentum falter entirely.

What we’re seeing is a market trying to decide whether it’s ready to extend the recent rally or start unwinding some of those gains. With the S&P, the index dipped just above the 50-hour moving band—a level that’s become popular in short-term decision-making. Interestingly, it came near enough to the average for it to attract attention but didn’t fall through it, which means short-term bullish bias remains intact, albeit narrowly. A firm rejection at that level could spark renewed optimism, but traders should continue to monitor it closely. Should it slip under that threshold on volume, it opens the door for a retracement towards the 5491 mark—a technically derived point calculated from the March through April price swing.

Trading Perspectives and Implications

In the Nasdaq, there was a similar dynamic. It fell to within just a few points of its respective 50-hour average and attracted dip buyers, indicating that some still view the index as technically supported. That buying reaction has short-term implications: unless we breach this level with follow-through selling, the trend bias remains upward. However, if it gives way, we expect a move toward 17,494—a level derived using a medium-term retracement from the high formed in mid-December.

From a trading perspective, when indices hover just above their defined support levels like this, they set up binary decision points. Hold, and momentum might resume. Break, and it often leads to liquidation by those who entered on late strength. Given how equity derivative positions often correlate to these patterns, the current setup forces a more precise approach. There’s little tolerance at this stage for drift or indecision.

For us, attention needs to stay firmly on whether these moving averages continue to attract buying support. If that pattern falters, the market likely re-prices quickly. For those active in short-dated futures or options, volatility around these zones will matter. Tight stops around the moving average lines allow for clarity in execution without hanging on to trades when structure begins to dissolve.

Timing is far from random here. Markets often behave with rhythm around widely observed figures, and today’s responses confirmed what many technicians already suspected: algorithmic and discretionary traders are both watching these averages. That reflexive buying could fade, but until a clean break occurs, both sides will continue positioning around these levels.

Price action in the coming sessions should be closely watched for follow-through—either in the form of renewed upside momentum that drags intraday lows higher, or a sustained move down that violates short-term support. How we trade around these events depends on whether price respects the action zones. A clustering of lows near these levels, without capitulation, might suggest attempted accumulation. But if volatility increases and spreads widen, risk may shift fast.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Breaking Past the Recent Highs

Resistance targets include the 200-day moving average at 0.6461, the recent high at 0.6493, and levels above 0.6500. Support targets are within the 0.6444–0.6429 swing area, the 100-hour moving average at 0.6430, and below 0.6429, which signals a shift towards a negative bias.

In essence, what has been happening with this currency pair shows us a fairly straightforward tilt in favour of buyers — but not without a few hesitations as it presses higher. The 200-day moving average has historically acted as a barometer of broader trend direction, and with prices hovering above it, we’re observing a market that’s leaning toward appreciation rather than depreciation. The short-term moving average at 0.6430 adds another supportive layer underneath, forming a cushion that has so far absorbed downside attempts.

Market Behaviour and Support Structures

The fact that price continues to hold cleanly above the recent swing zone — a zone that was once a lid and is now acting as a floor — tells us that market participants have re-evaluated value in this region. It’s no longer being sold off quickly when touched. Instead, each test of that area invites buyers, not profit-takers. That alone reflects a change in behaviour.

Should that momentum continue, particularly with a firm move past the recent high, attention might turn to less congested pricing levels where sellers previously gained the upper hand in the final quarter of last year. These aren’t just psychological round numbers above 0.6500 — they represent a price memory reacting to past exhaustion points, where liquidity was consumed and price failed to continue. Watching how the pair behaves as it approaches those zones can offer early clues. Notably, any clean clearance of 0.6493 would remove the final short-term hurdle and could invite mechanical or systematic follow-through.

However, traders relying too heavily on near-term support holding indefinitely may find themselves vulnerable. The structure below — comprising the 200-day measure and that 0.6429–0.6444 band — is not unbreakable. These are dynamic levels; just because sellers haven’t taken control yet doesn’t mean they’re inactive. Sustained price below that region would likely set off programmed selling, and we’d expect stretched long holders to lighten exposure under pressure. From past cycles, we’ve often seen that, once stability below the 200-day average is established, pricing doesn’t linger — it pushes or cascades.

For those of us observing this from a derivatives standpoint, attention cannot just rely on static spots or averages. It’s the sequences — how quickly price leaves areas, how often it returns, and with what volume — that hint at where positioning might be misaligned. While present support structures look intact, we’re alert to false breakouts. True strength is best seen in subsequent follow-through, not in the breakout itself. So, should price edge beyond 0.6493 and then fade quickly back into range, that would not be grounds for optimism.

On shorter time horizons, there’s enough structure beneath to anchor near-term bets. The 100-hour average offers intraday support verification, but it can’t support a broader stance if the rest of the structure gives way. We’ll be using that level as a timing reference — it doesn’t carry weight on its own unless accompanied by broader-market cues or price-volume divergence.

Throughout upcoming sessions, it will be prudent to maintain attention on the gaps between levels rather than fixate solely on the levels themselves. How price behaves inside them — how long it stays, whether it accelerates or drifts — will be instructive. We’ve seen time and again that consolidations near highs without rejection often signal preparation, not exhaustion.

Finally, while previous technical zones serve as historical guides, what truly shifts the tone is how orderly price movement remains in the lead-up to known resistance. If volatility expands and candles widen near pressure points, we often treat that as preparation for a move, not reaction to one. Let’s keep focus narrowed to that behaviour.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

United States Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reported ongoing negotiations with 17 trading partners but noted China is not currently involved. Bessent mentioned potential announcements of trade deals with major partners in the near future.

The US Dollar Index experienced a decrease, dropping by 0.4%, reaching 99.37. This decline occurred despite Bessent’s comments.

Understanding Tariffs

Tariffs are customs duties on merchandise imports, designed to aid local producers by offering price advantages. While both tariffs and taxes generate revenue, tariffs are paid by importers at entry ports, unlike taxes paid at purchase time.

Economists are divided on tariffs; some believe they protect domestic industries, while others think they could raise prices and trigger trade wars. Former US President Donald Trump emphasized tariffs to boost the US economy, focusing on nations like Mexico, China, and Canada.

In 2024, these countries accounted for 42% of US imports, with Mexico leading at $466.6 billion. Trump’s plan included using tariff revenue to cut personal income taxes.

What the initial reporting shows is a shift—or perhaps a recalibration—in the direction of American trade policy, particularly when it comes to its relations beyond China. Bessent’s remarks point to an expanding patchwork of bilateral dealings, ideally to be concluded shortly, aimed at strengthening economic ties with select nations. It is telling, however, that China remains outside this current discussion, suggesting either a tactical pause or unresolved tension.

Despite these efforts, the reaction in currency markets betrays little confidence—at least for now. The US Dollar Index falling by 0.4% to 99.37 does not inspire an optimistic interpretation. Normally, optimism around expanded trade, especially from a major economy, should translate into stronger currency demand. Instead, what we witnessed is a dip, which hints that investors are either underwhelmed by the details shared or sceptical of the near-term benefit to the broader economy. From our end, this sort of movement tends to follow an underlying worry about either inflation dynamics, deficit impacts, or the credibility of future deal enforcement.

The Role of Tariffs in Trade Strategy

What has been quietly but firmly placed underneath the announcement is a rekindling of tariff-based strategy. The explanation serves to remind audiences of the basics—tariffs are not consumer-facing taxes but charges levied before goods even enter the domestic market. They shield certain industries by skewing price advantages in their favour. But that is only one side of the story.

Where economists stand remains split. There’s the view that industries can stay afloat under the protective pressure of import duties. And there’s the counterpoint: that such moves, while helpful to one part of the economy, often raise input costs for others, pulling inflation upwards and endangering purchasing power. Some of us will remember the last administration’s resolve to use tariffs as blunt instruments—on neighbours and rivals alike—in an attempt to generate fiscal space for domestic tax cuts.

Interestingly, by 2024, Mexico had outpaced China and Canada as America’s top import source, racking up nearly $467 billion in trade. This aligns with prior strategy but also adds pressure on trade frameworks to stay functional and predictable. Any tweaking of tariffs, or even the suggestion of going back to a more insulated system, could once again fray commercial ties unless carefully orchestrated.

With negotiations heating up and certain blocs now more consequential, volatility in pricing for futures, especially those linked to transport, energy, and industrial commodities, could be more pronounced than in previous quarters. Trading firms with exposure to exchange-rate dependent products may see further differentiation in premiums and discount structures. Meanwhile, option flows are likely to tilt in favour of hedging mechanisms over outright directional plays, given the uncertainty over which deals reach final form and what fine print they might carry.

Risk models should be updated to reflect this asymmetry: if tariffs do return as a major policy plank, early visibility on which sectors face higher fees could mean the difference between straddling risk and walking into it. Our teams are adjusting ratio spreads accordingly and watching for any clear correlation shift between dollar movement and major imported good pricing. Timing reactions to announcements will matter more than usual.

In short, where clarity is absent, we plan for divergence. And in a backdrop where trade talk builds but yields little market lift, pricing in resilience takes precedence over betting on transformation.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.