US-China talks over the weekend have reportedly been positive, with Trump stating a productive meeting took place. Unlike previous instances, China has not refuted US claims and maintains an optimistic stance, suggesting a change in approach.

Both nations are expected to issue a rare joint statement following discussions in Switzerland, though the timing remains uncertain. China has metaphorically referred to the outcome as “delicious,” implying the eventual announcement will be highly favourable on a global scale.

Market Reactions

Market reactions have been positive as a result of the meeting, though the specifics remain crucial for future negotiations. Reports suggest an “economic and trade consultation mechanism” was proposed, serving as the foundation for ongoing US-China discussions.

The immediate implications for current tariffs, including existing 145% levels, are unclear. Trump hinted at a “total reset,” but specifics remain ambiguous regarding negotiation intentions and tariff alterations. A joint statement might suggest easing tariffs to facilitate negotiations within a certain timeline.

Observers are cautious, draw comparisons to the unsuccessful Phase One trade deal from Trump’s first term, and anticipate further negotiations in the context of ongoing decoupling between the two nations.

What we know so far is that discussions between the United States and China have moved past confrontation and into something that, at least externally, looks more constructive. Unlike in previous cycles, where conflicting public statements often followed high-level meetings, this time Beijing has not contradicted Washington’s account. Instead, there’s a noticeable shift — a clear willingness to present a unified front. For those of us watching policy shifts from a short-term exposure standpoint, this matters. A coordinated narrative implies fewer disruptive surprises.

Still, nothing concrete has been laid out yet. No tariff rollbacks have been officially detailed, and the so-called “reset” remains an idea, not an action. Underneath the warm diplomatic phrases, tariffs are still as high as 145%, providing little immediate relief for those in export-sensitive sectors. While rhetoric is softening, positioning should consider that material changes tend to lag behind diplomatic statements. Talk, however friendly, has yet to change the pricing environment.

Economic And Trade Consultation Mechanism

There are murmurs of an “economic and trade consultation mechanism” being set up — a phrase which might sound vague at first, but we should recognise it for what it could be: a procedural framework, likely with institutional staffing and monthly check-ins. It would not exist purely for appearances. If implemented, such a structure could start to formalise communication channels and reduce the likelihood of erratic policy changes. This has potential to dampen volatility, but only if terms are binding or at least regular. So far, timelines or enforceability haven’t been verified.

The key point here is timing. Sporadic comments from Washington suggest goodwill, yet a joint statement from both parties — something rarely issued in past standoffs — hasn’t materialised. Its delay isn’t surprising; these declarations take careful assembly. But without it, traders should not treat risk momentum as one-directional. We understand from past cycles that political sway can reverse sharply, especially when driven by domestic agendas. As such, we aren’t adjusting hedging strategies just yet.

Comparisons to earlier trade accords do carry some weight. Observers looking back at the Phase One agreement will recall how early optimism led to badly misplaced expectations. Those who got ahead of events then were forced into defensive positions not long after. At the time, there was similarly suggested cooperation, but the outcomes were far less than what was anticipated. This context should shape our approach now. We are watching for follow-through, not just friendliness.

Policies linked to decoupling initiatives are still alive, particularly within technology transfer areas. Many of these measures require legislative reversal to unwind. Because of this, any strategic moves based on scaling back of enforcement or changes in trade regimes should be based on documentable progress — not statements alone. Until there is written confirmation, paired with defined timelines for tariff reductions or procedural reforms, positions reliant on softer trade exposures still carry high directional risk.

It is also worth pointing out that media tone has lightened — this isn’t without influence. Positive headlines often prompt mechanical response from models and high-frequency systems, which can amplify short momentum moves. But headline optimism not backed by treaties or formally signed protocols tends to fade once trading desks reprice forward risk. We have seen this occur repeatedly in prior cycles. And recent comments point to the idea that this optimism is about future possibility, not yet about concrete change.

Restraint in positioning remains the preferred route in the short window. Active strategies are better served by waiting for terms to be released, preferably in joint form, and then assessing not only the content but also which arms of government are set to enforce the terms. Until then, synthetic spreads and volatility structures should be handled conservatively, especially in currency-linked and auto-related exposures.

We should be prepared for a sharp response once clarity arrives — but not presume that delay equals failure. These processes are slow by design, and patience is needed. For now, until words turn into mechanisms and figures, actions should be prudent and nimble, guided by levels rather than storylines.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Gold prices in the Philippines dropped on Monday. The price per gram was PHP 5,846.05, a decrease from PHP 5,929.07 on Friday.

For Gold measured per tola, the cost decreased to PHP 68,187.17, down from PHP 69,155.48. In terms of a Troy Ounce, the price was recorded at PHP 181,832.60.

Role Of Central Banks

Central banks are the largest holders of Gold, using it to bolster currency during unstable times. They purchased 1,136 tonnes in 2022, the biggest annual purchase recorded.

Gold typically has an inverse correlation with the US Dollar and Treasuries. When the Dollar weakens, Gold usually rises as a hedge against economic instability.

Variations in Gold prices occur due to geopolitical factors or fears of recession. The relationship with interest rates is also crucial as Gold prices often increase with lower rates and fall with higher ones.

With prices seeing a notable dip from Friday’s levels, those of us closely monitoring short-term momentum can begin factoring in a recalibration of positioning. The fall from PHP 5,929.07 to PHP 5,846.05 per gram isn’t just nominal—it reflects a broader response to external pressures, particularly stemming from recent shifts in global sentiment around inflation expectations and currency strength. When viewed per tola, the drop to PHP 68,187.17—down nearly a full thousand pesos—underlines the softening demand or waning of speculative pushes that previously kept higher bid levels stable.

From what we’ve observed, fluctuations like these often follow cues from movements in the Dollar and demand for safe-haven assets. It helps to consider the Dollar’s recent firmness, which has been nudging Gold lower despite modest geopolitical tremors. The inverse dynamic there isn’t just theoretical—it’s one we see play out in real time. For traders operating on leverage, this can affect margin requirements and execution timing, especially if volatility remains below average and directional moves are brief but persistent.

Impact Of Interest Rates

Last week’s numbers still echo the impact of prominent institutional behaviour. In 2022, global central banks—who by far dominate physical accumulation—purchased over 1,100 tonnes of Gold. That set a new record, highlighting how state players respond when inflation hedges become more attractive than sovereign debt. These reserve managers aren’t reacting impulsively—they are building buffers against long-term currency erosion and diversifying away from traditional holdings in uncertain periods.

Rates, however, are not backing Bulls at the moment. Higher interest rates tend to increase the yield on cash and comparable short-term instruments, undercutting the appeal of holding metals that generate no income. If policymakers reinforce hawkish stances and issue stronger rate guidance in the coming weeks, we’ll likely see continued pressure. Traders focusing on derivatives tied to Gold’s forward curve must consider how expectations for real yields will develop, particularly if inflation metrics in the upcoming cycle fail to cool.

Fears of recession, if carried further by weaker manufacturing data or heightened tensions in Eastern Europe, could provide temporary relief, especially across longer-dated contracts. But that depends entirely on where the Dollar moves next.

We’re tracking subtle shifts more than sharp turns right now—which means acting quickly on smaller breakouts while maintaining discipline on expiry and leverage risk. Directional conviction is lower than earlier in the quarter. Best to remain descriptive in our execution—avoiding overextension—especially when cross-asset volatility levels remain contained. Much of the movement this week might come not from spot changes, but expectations around when rate cuts could plausibly resume.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Bitcoin futures are trading at around $104,265, slightly below the Volume Weighted Average Price (VWAP) of $104,530. This indicates mild bearish momentum, though it is tentative since the session is still ongoing.

For May 12, 2025, a bullish position is above $104,735, surpassing the developing Value Area High (VAH) of $104,630. Bullish targets are $105,200, $105,540, and $108,200. A bearish position is below $103,920, under today’s Value Area Low (VAL) at $104,070, with targets of $103,590, $103,140, $102,360, $101,850, and $100,450.

The analysis uses volume profile strategies, pointing to areas with significant historical trading activity. VWAP serves as an average price level weighted by trade volume, acting as a benchmark in price trends.

Bitcoin has recently crossed the $100,000 level, a major psychological barrier. Markets often revisit such milestones, potentially causing volatility. Medium-term trends suggest possible consolidation around $100,000, while the long-term outlook leans towards revisiting the historical high near $110,150.

Traders should watch key levels, considering partial profit-taking and remaining flexible. Proper risk management is essential, using tradeCompass analysis to guide decisions while adapting to market conditions.

This analysis outlines the present tension between price levels and traded volume. The marginally lower futures price compared to the volume-weighted average price (VWAP) hints at declining confidence in current upward momentum, though the market has not yet made a decisive move. The reference to a developing value area reveals where the majority of activity has clustered—above or below this zone will likely shape the next direction.

We’ve taken note of how traders have responded near the $104,735 and $103,920 range. These figures become pivot points not because of chart patterns alone, but due to the thick concentration of past trades, suggesting they matter to institutions and algorithmic strategies alike. Once price moves away from these pockets—either above or below—the next levels tend to appear quickly, leading to bursts of activity.

Lu suggests entry above or below these boundaries, with clear exits offensively positioned. The upside path, mapped out decisively at $105,200, then $105,540 and even up to $108,200, creates a setup that could gather steam swiftly if buyers step in. On the downside, however, we have dense target placements every few hundred dollars. These are no throwaway zones—they’re likely tied to prior high-volume floors that were eroded and are now vulnerable again.

The crossing over $100,000 has placed Bitcoin into an unfamiliar psychological range. When assets cross such well-watched prices, they tend to pause and recalibrate as traders reassess. That behaviour is what drove volume surges in prior sessions and is expected again here. Once price stabilises above or below this level with conviction, we might see larger moves that don’t reverse as quickly.

Meanwhile, median-term strategies should expect tightening ranges. That would point to rotational play—fading the extremes and holding limited exposure overnight. However, long-term signals still lean quietly towards higher ground near $110,150, reflecting broader risk appetite rather than short-term exhaustion.

As we’ve observed, large moves don’t typically begin without a reaction from VWAP or developing value zones. These are tools which help us decide whether recent price moves are gathering follow-through or simply returning to fair value. Without that context, positions become guesswork.

In practice, managing entries selectively—at known price clusters rather than chasing strength—has produced fewer whipsaws. Fast entries and partial exits into strength have worked where levels were clearly mapped. Breakout entries into illiquid zones above $108,000—or below $100,000—require reduced sizing due to velocity risk.

Risk control remains tight. We’ve maintained hard stops just beyond low-volume pockets, allowing positions room to breathe yet tightening faster near expected exit zones to guard gains. Trading turns less forgiving near trapped volume and quickly punishes hesitation when volatility returns.

Reading order flow this week may carry more weight than usual. We’ll allow reaction time at these areas instead of guessing intent. Patience here doesn’t mean inactivity—it means choosing carefully, showing up where the tape turns active, and letting earlier planning dictate size.

The EUR/USD pair starts the week weaker due to a modest US Dollar increase supported by optimism over a US-China trade deal. Despite this, prices remain above the 1.1200 mark, as traders await further details from the US-China joint statement.

A recent decline below the 100-period SMA on the 4-hour chart signals potential bearish movement. Oscillators are in bearish territory and gaining negative traction on the daily chart, indicating a downward path for the EUR/USD pair.

Resilience Below 1.1200 Level

Prices show resilience below the 1.1200 level, which coincides with the 200-period SMA on the 4-hour chart. A decisive break here could lead the pair towards the 1.1110-1.1100 area, with intermediate support near the 1.1130-1.1125 region.

The 1.1250 zone presents an immediate hurdle for EUR/USD. Reclaiming the 1.1300 level could face resistance near the 100-period SMA on the 4-hour chart, around the 1.1350-1.1355 range, acting as a pivotal point for the Euro’s trajectory.

The Euro is the currency for Eurozone countries and is the second most traded currency worldwide. The European Central Bank manages monetary policy and interest rates, which affects the Euro’s value.

What we’re seeing in the EUR/USD pair is a mild softening, which has been driven by an uptick in the Dollar – itself buoyed by constructive developments in trade talks between Washington and Beijing. Even so, the pair has managed to hold steady just above the 1.1200 zone, a level that’s been tested before but hasn’t given way yet. Traders are evidently taking a cautious approach, waiting for more clarity in the form of official communication from the people involved in the negotiations.

Technical Analysis

Now, turning to technicals. The retreat beneath the 100-period simple moving average on the four-hour chart isn’t encouraging. It suggests that any bullish momentum we had has faltered, and there’s some downside pressure building. When we look at the oscillators – those momentum indicators on the daily time frame – they’re painting a bearish picture. They’ve not only crossed below neutral levels but are also sliding further into negative territory. This tends to happen before the price picks up speed in the same direction, and in this case, that direction appears to be lower.

Support appears to be forming near the 1.1130 to 1.1125 zone – that’s just above the 1.1110 region, and traders will likely be watching those levels to see whether a floor forms or if price slices through, triggering another wave of selling. What adds weight to this area is its alignment with prior lows – it’s acted as a buffer before, and if it breaks now, expect some acceleration to the downside.

That said, resilience near current levels should not be dismissed lightly. The price has repeatedly shown an ability to hold above the 200-period SMA on the same four-hour chart, tucked just under the 1.1200 figure. It could indicate consolidation rather than a breakdown, but it’s not a level to assume will hold without backup from improving sentiment or a shift in fundamentals.

On the other side of the equation, attempts to reclaim lost ground will likely meet headwinds near 1.1250. Beyond that, the next technical hurdle is positioned in the 1.1350 to 1.1355 zone, guarded closely by the 100-period SMA, which has started acting more like a ceiling than a support line. A decisive close above that area would likely see a rethink in positioning, signalling a pause – if not a reversal – in the downward trajectory we’ve been watching recently.

The Euro, naturally, is heavily influenced by policy settings across the Euro Area, particularly those set in Frankfurt. The policy environment hasn’t shifted dramatically, but with growth concerns still present, the stance remains conservative. That monetary outlook, when compared with its overseas counterpart, sways interest differentials in favour of the Dollar, adding further context to why the pair is behaving the way it is.

Traders dealing in interest rate-sensitive assets will likely want to monitor this region closely. Price stability at current levels will matter more in the coming sessions, particularly if sentiment around trade developments starts to cool or surprise. For now, the weight lies slightly on the downside, but that can shift swiftly if external factors move.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

FX option expiries are noted for 12 May at 10 AM, New York time. For EUR/USD, the 1.1250 level is noteworthy. While it has no technical links, the expiries are close to the gap closure level as the pair opened with a gap down.

Positive US-China talks have strengthened the dollar. However, today’s expiries might not be very impactful due to other factors. Market players are waiting for a joint statement from the US and China about their future steps.

Market Impact of FX Options

For USD/JPY, the $145.65 level is also noted but lacks technical relevance. The overall impact of these expiries could be minimal, with the dollar and risk sentiment being larger influences on price movements. Headline risks still play a central role in guiding market behaviour.

The overall risk mood is optimistic as equities climb higher, but dollar gains remain modest. There’s a difference in terms of current exuberance levels. It remains to be seen which side is correct by day’s end, as the markets will adjust accordingly to the unfolding events.

Reading over the earlier content, we can infer several layers worth unpacking. Today’s FX options expiries, though specified with particular strikes on EUR/USD and USD/JPY, appear unlikely to steer the market in the immediate term. The EUR/USD expiry near 1.1250, albeit technically insignificant, lines up with the area where a weekend gap might close. So while options flow near that region could add some gravity, price action will likely respond more fervently to wider macro signals or intraday momentum.

There’s been a mild dollar bid, nudged along by encouraging tones from diplomatic channels between the United States and China. The fact that both countries are edging toward a public declaration of coordination on trade and broader economic fronts introduces tailwinds for risk sentiment, even as exact statements remain pending. We, as observers and participants, should recognise that the dollar’s moves are tethered at present less to one-off options flow and more to the broader mood surrounding geopolitical cooperation. Equity markets are hinting at a preference for optimism, even as FX treads more carefully.

Role of Expiries and Market Sentiment

Looking at USD/JPY, there’s a listed expiry around 145.65, and once again, it sits without technical framing. These kinds of levels, lacking chart-based context or recent volume confluence, tend not to drive action by themselves. Expiries like these can still slow price motion temporarily if order books thin out close by, but it’s unlikely in this instance. The overriding dynamic remains tethered to sentiment around risk appetite and the dollar’s shifting performance.

Headline-driven sessions, particularly those without major economic releases, tend to exaggerate reactions at times. We’re seeing that today. Equities continue pressing higher, which usually points to a friendlier global risk tone, yet the dollar’s strength remains unusually persistent. It’s this divergence between equity enthusiasm and FX caution that may be telling us something about positioning. Perhaps it’s reflecting hedging rather than outright buying.

Given that, the importance today lies less in following any arbitrary number on the board and more in staying attuned to the alignment—or misalignment—between cross-asset clues. Traders who are positioned in options or those monitoring implied volatility should be anchored less to expiry pricing itself and more to the timing of statements or scheduled speakers. If we do see movement, it’s likely that it will come from news flow and not from the gravity of expiring strike prices.

This kind of atmosphere typically introduces short bursts of activity, interspersed with quieter patches while the market waits for direction. That creates traps for the over-eager and opportunities for those who wait. As usual, correlation between cross assets remains one of the most reliable temp checks on which way positioning might lean next.

By late afternoon into early Asia, it should become clearer whether this current round of optimism carries broader commitment. In the meantime, staying reactive and watching how price reacts when it gets close to these labelled expiry levels will tell us whether they’re worth tracking further tomorrow—or whether they were simply background noise.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Dear Client,

Please note that the dividends of the following products will be adjusted accordingly. Index dividends will be executed separately through a balance statement directly to your trading account, and the comment will be in the following format “Div & Product Name & Net Volume”.

Please refer to the table below for more details:

The above data is for reference only, please refer to the MT4/MT5 software for specific data.

If you’d like more information, please don’t hesitate to contact info@vtmarkets.com.

Gold prices in India experienced a decline on Monday. The per gram price fell to 8,918.24 Indian Rupees (INR), from 9,045.35 INR on Friday.

Additionally, the price per tola dropped to 104,020.50 INR, down from 105,503.20 INR at the end of last week. Other gold price measurements include 89,182.50 INR for ten grams and 277,380.30 INR per Troy Ounce.

Gold Price Dynamics

Gold prices in India are updated daily and reflect international prices adjusted for the local currency using the exchange rate. The prices are intended for reference, and actual rates might vary.

Gold is regarded as a store of value and a hedge against inflation and currency depreciation. Central banks, particularly from emerging economies, are the largest gold buyers, with 1,136 tonnes added to reserves in 2022.

Gold’s price is influenced by several factors, including geopolitical stability and interest rates. It has an inverse relationship with the US Dollar and Treasuries. Its price tends to rise in times of decreased interest rates or increased geopolitical tensions, while a strong US Dollar can suppress the price.

That decline in Indian gold prices—from ₹9,045.35 to ₹8,918.24 per gram—carries a message that goes beyond local supply or festive demand. It’s mirroring wider movements in global macroeconomic expectations and dollar strength, translated into rupee terms through the exchange rates. A similar downward move shows up in the tola and ounce-based quotes. These translated prices serve more as signals than execution levels, but the takeaway is clear.

This shift is part of a larger adjustment in sentiment as investors respond to mixed signals from Western economies. Recent firmness in the US Dollar is making it less attractive to hold unyielding assets like gold. As traders, we’re not just watching bullion tickers—we’re observing how the bond market is pricing in future rate paths. Yields on Treasuries have been inching higher, and that directly reduces the opportunity cost of holding gold. It matters because it shifts flows in and out of physical assets—sentiment doesn’t need to be negative, just slightly less enthusiastic, and that alone applies downward pressure.

Liquidity and Market Sentiment

Reference buyers from prior periods, such as central banks in regions like Southeast Asia and Latin America, have provided baseline demand. But their net positions don’t always move with market fluidity. They respond to multi-quarter policy outlooks. So, extrapolating future floor support from historic purchases may misguide shorter-term positioning.

There’s liquidity moving into higher-yielding exposures. This has added weight to gold’s pullback, even if only measured in small increments. And we can’t ignore the role of data surprises. Just a couple of unexpected payroll or inflation prints could steer the Federal Reserve’s tone, impacting liquidity preferences before quarter-end.

Bassett from ING pointed out last week that the inverse correlation between bullion and the US Dollar remains intact—for now. Powell’s latest remarks were carefully non-committal, which leaves the market delicately balanced. A sustained gold rebound in the short term would likely require a firm dovish turn or a geopolitical headline sharp enough to stir fear-based buying. Neither has materialised in the past fortnight.

From our side, all of this generates a more data-sensitive environment, where implied volatility across rate instruments remains elevated, and short-term directional bias may be fleeting. It’s not the season to lean heavily on directional conviction but to calmly assess how major currency fluctuations or bond auctions ripple into the metal’s pricing.

For further refinement, we should be measuring movement not only in gold spot prices but also in term structures of futures and options—what implied probabilities tell us about December’s pricing conditions may have more predictive strength than any single central bank headline.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Goldman Sachs has adjusted its forecast for China’s yuan exchange rate. The bank anticipates USD/CNY will fall to 7.20 in the next three months, 7.10 in six months, and will reach 7 over the coming year.

The bank suggests China’s exports will stay robust due to the currency’s undervaluation on a real trade-weighted basis, particularly compared to the dollar. These undervalued levels could lead to a stronger onshore yuan, potentially offsetting tariff reductions.

Forecast Update Reported

This forecast update was reported in a Bloomberg article referencing a Goldman Sachs note from last Friday.

What Goldman have done here is revise how they see the yuan moving against the dollar over the coming months. They now expect it to strengthen steadily, from where it is today, down to 7.20 in three months’ time, then 7.10 in six months, and finally settling at 7.00 over the course of the year. This is not a wholesale shift in thinking; it’s more like a fine-tuning of their expectations based on recent trade dynamics and economic indicators.

They’re making this call because they believe the yuan is trading too cheaply when you look at it through the lens of a trade-weighted index. That kind of measurement compares the yuan not just to the dollar but to a basket of other currencies used in China’s global trade. By that reading, the currency is still undervalued, so any sustained strength in exports—especially if global demand holds—could give the yuan room to climb. It’s a relatively mechanical relationship: strong exports mean steady demand for the currency, and that pushes it up.

Short Term Positioning

Now, what we need to consider is what this means for short-term positioning. If this view holds water, there’s a clear signal for the pricing of yuan-related derivatives. Anything structured on future expectations of depreciation might see repricing pressure. For example, implied volatility on USD/CNY could be moving too high if the currency’s appreciation path turns out to be smoother than some assume. Calendar spreads where the forward curve bakes in too much pessimism could begin to unwind.

In our view, the trade-weighted comment hints that the pressure isn’t necessarily coming from inside China—capital flight, policy missteps, or anything of the sort—but rather from a stubbornly strong dollar and weak peers. If the dollar starts to give ground, the mechanics around the yuan shift quickly. We’d likely see fewer intervention whispers and more organic moves in one direction. That should affect not just directional trades but also carry models and negative carry trades that rely on yuan stability to hold ground.

A possible readjustment of hedging strategies might now be on the table too. Forwards priced off short-term depreciation assumptions may be misaligned against the momentum Goldman sees building. This doesn’t mean abandoning protection entirely, but it does suggest running a fresh sensitivity check on exposure, particularly where non-deliverable forwards are concerned.

Tariffs were also mentioned, but almost in passing. That makes sense—the point seems to be that even if external pressure from tariffs fades, the internal strength of the currency could still take hold. In that case, policy fine-tuning by the central bank becomes less disruptive, and the exchange rate trades with more reflectiveness of trade demand and flow imbalances, not policy shadows.

One ought to watch how the short-end of the curve responds. If there’s appetite for yuan-denominated assets and reserves continue to hold, then front-month contracts could begin to show some narrowing. We would also keep an eye on option skew. If traders start expecting fewer topside emergencies, you might see lower demand for protection above 7.30 or so, making those calls cheaper.

It’s not a vacuum though—this view sets up a clear framework for divergence. If the broader macro narrative sours, especially with the Fed dragging its feet on rate cuts, this expected appreciation might stall. But if things hold, or if the dollar softens enough, as we suspect could be the case, the valuation gap Goldman referenced won’t last indefinitely.

Ultimately, the line they’re drawing is not about policy announcements or shock events—it’s about how pricing may have drifted too far from fundamentals. That’s not usually exciting at first glance, but in FX derivatives, it’s often where the steadier money is made.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Gold prices in Malaysia decreased on Monday, with the cost per gram dropping to 453.06 Malaysian Ringgits (MYR), down from MYR 459.30 on Friday. The price per tola decreased to MYR 5,284.39 from MYR 5,357.15.

Gold is considered a valuable asset historically used as a store of value and medium of exchange. It is also seen as a safe-haven asset during uncertain times, and a hedge against inflation and currency depreciation.

Central Bank Influence

Central banks are the largest buyers of gold, holding it to diversify reserves and strengthen economic perceptions. In 2022, central banks added 1,136 tonnes of gold, valued at approximately $70 billion, marking the largest annual purchase recorded.

Gold has an inverse correlation with the US Dollar and US Treasuries. When the Dollar weakens, Gold prices tend to rise, while stronger dollars often suppress Gold prices. Geopolitical instability and economic recessions can cause Gold prices to escalate. Lower interest rates can raise the gold price, as it is a yield-less asset.

Gold prices are influenced primarily by the performance of the USD, as they are priced in dollars. A weaker Dollar usually results in increased Gold prices.

The recent drop in local gold prices—from MYR 459.30 per gram last week to MYR 453.06 now—reflects broader shifts in global expectations. A similar move was noted in the price per tola, which fell by over MYR 70 during the same period. This decline seems in step with a firmer US Dollar and growing talk around interest rate guidance, particularly in the US Treasury yields space.

As we’ve often found, gold behaves in direct contrast to the dollar. When the greenback strengthens, the precious metal feels the weight. That’s perhaps what we’re seeing here. Investors tend to shift towards dollar-based or interest-bearing assets when rates rise or when the economic outlook implies stability in monetary tightening cycles. In essence, when yields on US Treasuries get more attractive, gold—with no yield of its own—loses some appeal.

At the same time, macroeconomic signals have been relatively steady. There hasn’t been a fresh wave of geopolitical breakdowns or unexpected inflation surges, both of which usually send gold higher. In that sense, the safe-haven demand appears to have taken a pause. Without clear headlines driving fear or currency instability, we may see gold stay within a narrower band in the near term.

Future Projections and Strategies

That said, it’s important to watch the central bank footprint. Over the past year, their role has become more assertive. With over 1,100 tonnes bought in 2022 alone, demand from institutional coffers has kept undercurrents of support beneath prices, even during speculative pullbacks. So, while lower prices could make for attractive entry levels, the momentum will depend largely on Dollar flows and rate commentary.

We should be watching upcoming FOMC releases closely. If dovish tones start to surface again, gold could find a leg up. However, don’t expect explosive moves unless there’s a sudden economic data miss or liquidity event. Those signals usually push short-term hedgers toward commodities.

From a derivatives perspective, short-term positioning should reflect that gold tends to retrace quite quickly. Use tightening stops on any bullish exposure and allow room for potential mean-reversion if overreaction to macro news appears in the market. For those structuring options, implied volatility might remain low unless newsflow brings new uncertainty. In that event, long-vol strategies can become more attractive by comparison.

We’re also paying attention to correlations—it’s not just the Dollar, but correlations to equity indices and even energy markets can drive price swings. Of note lately, oil softness has corresponded with slight gold weakness. This could extend if broader commodity buckets lose strength, which would remove one layer of tail-risk demand from gold.

Ultimately, while the recent decline in Malaysian gold pricing offers a local-context update, the drivers remain globally pegged. Traders should operate with that in mind, structuring risk around inflation neutral scenarios, range-bound rates, and a Dollar that could still whipsaw on shifting sentiment.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Trade discussions between the US and China concluded in Geneva, with both nations expressing optimism. A mechanism for future talks has been established, and a joint statement is expected soon, indicating progress in their trade relationship.

US equity futures rose significantly with the reopening of markets, maintaining a steady climb with hopes for detailed improvements in trade relations. Currency markets reacted with USD/JPY rising and partially retracing, while EUR/USD lowered and fully reversed. Oil prices also increased before stabilising, and gold experienced a dip as Federal Reserve rate cut expectations reduced slightly.

The Impact Of US Policy Moves

In related news, President Trump plans to sign an executive order reducing US prescription drug prices by up to 80%, aiming to match international lows. This significant move may face legal challenges. Meanwhile, Japan’s Prime Minister Ishiba insisted on including auto tariffs in any trade agreement with the US, showing firm negotiation intentions.

The existing content outlines a few distinct themes that have shaped trading behaviour recently. Optimism surrounding US-China bilateral discussions has given participants room to reassess risk premiums and consider more constructive positioning. The announcement of a forthcoming joint statement helps anchor that sentiment, suggesting diplomatic traction rather than delay. Although not all aspects are resolved, the framework for continued talks removes some of the haze that had been weighing on forward-looking strategies.

Price action in US equity futures reflects this repricing in relatively linear fashion. That said, the absence of a volatility expansion suggests the move is driven more by relief than by an extrapolation of further immediate upside. Temporary pricing strength in the dollar-yen pair followed that view, only to fade as regional positioning and rate differentials recalibrated. The euro-dollar’s intra-session round trip underscores there is still caution among cross-asset flows, especially with rate-cut projections being quietly nudged lower.

Commodity Market Insights

On the commodities front, an early rally in oil was at first a natural reaction to marginally higher growth expectations, but soon encountered supply-side constraints that offset follow-through gains. Gold’s pullback reinforces this directional theme, pressured by a combination of lesser hedging needs and fading conviction of near-term easing from the Federal Reserve.

Further down the headlines, Trump’s intended executive order on drug pricing signals an abrupt reordering of sectoral priorities, which if enacted swiftly could affect healthcare equities and related derivative exposures. Nevertheless, the potential for legal contests introduces a layer of duration risk. We should view this more as a policy placeholder than a near-certainty in the current legislative environment. Separately, Ishiba’s push on auto tariffs signals a more assertive counterparty stance. This presents a likely point of friction, especially for those with exposure to industries sensitive to import costs.

Looking at how best to approach the next few weeks, a close eye on rate volatility remains warranted, particularly if inflation prints begin to pick up. Key is how markets internalise the tone of the joint statement when it’s released. Hedging strategies positioned short volatility may need rebalancing as macro clarity improves. Meanwhile, directional bets should focus not on binary trade outcomes, but on incremental shifts in base-case assumptions that lead into policy rhythm.

That also means tightening watch over central bank communication in both the US and Europe. Any deviation in tone, particularly surrounding employment expectations or energy inputs, is likely to ripple across rate products and terminals. With derivative pricing still adjusting to evolving drivers around global demand and policy, moves are likely to remain tide-driven rather than trend-laden for now. Active position management will be necessary to avoid riding too closely to errant optimism or dismissive pessimism.

We now find ourselves in the stage where sentiment indicators are more telling than trailing data, and timing sensitivity grows more acute across all risk-bearing instruments. Spreads have not yet reflected full confidence; this is not a detriment, but rather an opportunity to observe. Those willing to read closely beneath headline movements can act with greater asymmetry.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.