Beijing is unlikely to lower tariffs before talks in Switzerland. A spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy stated that China opposes US tariff policies and plans to defend its interests.

Currently, the US Dollar Index is down 0.25%, while the Australian Dollar sees a 0.54% rise against the US Dollar, trading near 0.6460. Tensions remain from the US-China trade war, which began in 2018, with Donald Trump’s tariffs on China leading to retaliation.

Us China Trade Tensions

Despite the Phase One trade deal in 2020 aimed at stabilising relations, tariffs remain under President Joe Biden. The return of Trump to presidency reignited US-China trade tensions with plans for additional tariffs, affecting global supply chains and inflation.

In currency movements, the GBP/USD pair rebounds, trading near 1.3340, as speculation grows about a US-UK trade agreement. The EUR/USD shows slight gains above 1.1300 amid USD selling and trade uncertainties. Gold prices continue their upward challenge, eyeing a price of $3,435.

The recent Federal Open Market Committee meeting concluded with no change to the federal funds rate, maintaining the target range at 4.25%-4.50%. Meanwhile, the altcoin market faces complexity with fragmented narratives and liquidity issues.

What we’re watching unfold is a tense juncture in broader trade relations, where past policy choices are still echoing and shaping present economic behaviour. Beijing’s reluctance to reduce tariffs ahead of the upcoming Swiss discussions points towards a strategy that values leverage over compromise. A spokesperson has already clarified their position, stating their intent to defend economic interests rather than yield to Washington’s pressure. That alone sets a high bar for diplomatic progress in the near term—particularly as both sides hold firm to their longstanding principles.

The decline in the US Dollar Index, now down 0.25%, reflects both investor caution and increased supply pressure as capital moves toward risk-aligned assets. The Australian Dollar, rising 0.54% and now hovering around the 0.6460 level, benefits from this tilt. This adjusted outlook suggests traders are positioning for continued weakness in US fiscal diplomacy and potential reactions from Asia-Pacific policy hubs. We can expect these themes to remain influential in commodities as well, where gold is already climbing, testing resistance close to the $3,435 mark. Safe-haven flows appear unrelenting.

Global Economic Trends

Looking to the currency space, the GBP/USD bounce near 1.3340 is being shaped by new airflow surrounding a potential bilateral trade agreement. That momentum has lifted sterling beyond its recent base, and participants will likely continue to price in optimism until further clarity emerges. Across the Channel, the euro is provisionally stronger too—trading a shade above 1.1300. This subtle uptick is less about eurozone fundamentals and more a consequence of dollar softness, triggered by fiscal uncertainty and tangled supply dynamics.

As for rates, the most recent FOMC decision to hold borrowing costs steady within the 4.25%–4.50% target range sends a signal. Policymakers seem prepared to wait, to give previously enacted rate hikes time to unwind their effects. This patience from the Fed has generally tempered expectations for short-term volatility, although it also suggests relative calm could be disturbed by any rotation in inflation forecasts or labour data surprises in the US.

We also note how these macro layers are influencing low-liquidity corners of the market—particularly digital assets. The altcoin market continues to stagger under scattered sentiment and unclear catalysts. What’s keeping participation patchy is the widespread thinning of order books and the hesitation among major holders to build new positions in the face of inconsistent regulation and murmurs of tighter oversight.

Over the coming sessions, expect rates, currency pairs, and volatility pricing to respond heavily to progress—or the lack of it—in upcoming global trade discussions. For those tracking derivatives, it’s worth accounting for headline sensitivity across all FX crosses, as well as sector-specific commodity reaction tied to trade posturing. We’re also factoring in potential asymmetric risks: where modest political developments may produce outsized market swings, particularly where macro positioning is already skewed. Carefully structured option strategies may be the more efficient vehicles here, especially where implied volatility remains off recent highs.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Paper Trading: What is It and How Does It Work?

If you’re new to trading or want to refine your skills without risking real money, paper trading is the perfect solution. But what exactly is paper trading, and how does it work? Simply put, it allows traders to practice strategies using virtual funds in a risk-free environment. Whether you’re testing new strategies or learning the ropes, paper trading provides hands-on experience. In this article, we’ll explain what paper trading is, how it works, its benefits and drawbacks, and how to get started today.

What is Paper Trading?

Paper trading refers to the process of simulating trading in the financial markets using virtual money. It allows traders to practice their skills without risking real capital. The concept originated from the early days of trading when individuals would write down their trades on paper to track their performance. Today, trading platforms make paper trading possible, offering traders a risk-free environment to test strategies and learn how to navigate the markets.

This practice is essential for beginners and seasoned traders alike. By using simulated funds, traders can get a feel for real-time market conditions and improve their skills without the pressure of losing actual money.

How Does Paper Trading Work?

Paper trading works by allowing traders to place trades on a simulated platform with virtual money. The trades are based on real market prices, so the experience mirrors that of live trading. Most trading platforms, including VT Markets, offer a demo account that simulates live trading conditions using virtual funds. These accounts allow you to practice placing orders, managing trades, and navigating the platform, all while observing how strategies perform in real-time market conditions.

Traders can monitor their paper trade results, analyze them, and adjust strategies based on the simulated outcomes. This has the major advantage of allowing traders to get comfortable with the trading platform and market conditions without any financial risk.

Paper Trading vs Live Trading

Paper trading and live trading are both essential for testing and developing trading strategies, but they differ significantly in terms of experience and execution.

Paper trading allows traders to simulate trades using virtual funds, providing a risk-free environment to practice strategies. It mirrors live market conditions in real-time, but with no financial consequences. This makes it an excellent tool for beginners to build confidence, learn platform features, and test strategies. However, paper trading lacks the emotional intensity of live trading, as there’s no real money at stake. Traders may act more impulsively or take risks they wouldn’t take in live trading.

In contrast, live trading involves real money, making every trade carry actual financial risk. It provides real-time feedback on how strategies perform under live market conditions, including the emotional pressure of managing risk, dealing with losses, and handling market volatility. The experience is much more dynamic and requires traders to make quick decisions under stress. The emotional aspect of live trading plays a crucial role in decision-making, which paper trading cannot replicate.

While paper trading is a valuable tool for practice, live trading offers the full experience of managing real financial stakes and adapting to real market conditions. The emotional pressure and decision-making involved in live trading are key factors that paper trading cannot simulate.

Paper Trading vs Backtesting

Backtesting and paper trading are both methods used to test trading strategies, but they differ in how they simulate market conditions.

Backtesting applies a strategy to historical data to evaluate its performance. This method helps traders understand how a strategy would have performed in the past under specific market conditions. However, backtesting only provides a static view, as it doesn’t account for the real-time unpredictability of the market, and there’s no feedback on how the strategy adapts to current market dynamics.

On the other hand, paper trading allows traders to test strategies in real-time with live market data but without risking actual money. It simulates current market conditions and provides the trader with immediate results from their trades, helping them practice order execution and adjust strategies on the fly. However, paper trading lacks the psychological pressure of real trading, as no real capital is involved.

The primary difference between the two is that backtesting uses historical data for strategy evaluation, while paper trading simulates the execution of a strategy in real-time, providing a more interactive and realistic testing environment.

Both are essential tools, but paper trading offers a more realistic, hands-on experience, while backtesting gives insights into long-term viability.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Paper Trading

Paper trading offers a risk-free way to practice, but it has both advantages and limitations. While it helps you build confidence and test strategies, it doesn’t replicate the emotional challenges of live trading. Let’s take a look at both the benefits and drawbacks of paper trading.

Advantages

Risk-Free Learning: The most obvious advantage is the ability to practice without the fear of losing real money. This makes it an ideal tool for beginners to learn the basics of trading.

Testing Strategies: Traders can test various trading strategies, such as scalping, day trading, or trend-following, to see what works best in different market conditions.

Platform Familiarity: Paper trading helps users become comfortable with the features and tools of a trading platform, making the transition to real trading smoother.

Building Confidence: With no financial risk involved, traders can gain confidence in their decisions, helping them build discipline and consistency.

Disadvantages

Lack of Emotional Engagement: Without real money at stake, traders often don’t experience the emotional pressure that comes with live trading. This can result in overconfidence and poor decision-making when transitioning to a real account.

Unrealistic Market Conditions: Since no actual funds are involved, paper trading can fail to simulate the psychological stress and fast decision-making required in live markets.

No Real-Time Market Impact: Trades in a paper trade environment do not affect the market, meaning there is no real slippage or order execution delay. It also doesn’t reflect how market volatility and liquidity can impact trades in a live market.

When Should You Use Paper Trading?

Paper trading is beneficial in several situations:

Beginners: If you’re new to trading, using a demo account is an excellent way to familiarize yourself with the market without risking real money.

Testing Strategies: If you’re developing or refining a trading strategy, paper trading allows you to experiment and adjust your approach without financial consequences.

Learning New Markets: If you’re looking to expand into new markets, such as stocks, forex, indices, precious metals, ETFs, soft commodities, energies, and more, paper trade first to understand how each market operates.

Refining Skills: Even experienced traders can benefit from paper trading to practice risk management and decision-making.

How to Start Paper Trading

Starting paper trading is simple. Most trading platforms offer a paper trading option where you can open a demo account. Here’s a quick guide:

Step 1: Learn How Trading Works

Understand the basics of trading and explore the different asset classes (stocks, forex, commodities, etc.).

Step 2: Open a Demo Account with VT Markets

Sign up with VT Markets, which offers paper trading, and open a demo account to get started.

Step 3: Analyze the Market

Use technical and fundamental analysis to review the market and identify trading opportunities.

Step 4: Choose Your Trade Direction

Decide whether to go long or short, and input your position size.

Step 5: Manage Your Risk

Set up risk management tools like stop-loss and take-profit to protect your trades.

Step 6: Start Trading

Execute your trades in the demo account as you would in a live market environment.

Step 7: Monitor and Adjust

Keep track of your trades, assess your performance, and adjust your strategy as needed.

It’s crucial to treat paper trading seriously—track your trades, reflect on your results, and make adjustments just as you would if real money were involved.

Conclusion

Paper trading is a valuable tool for traders of all levels. Whether you’re a beginner looking to learn the basics or an experienced trader refining your approach, a demo account allows you to practice without financial risk. However, keep in mind that the emotional experience of live trading is something paper trading can’t replicate. Once you feel confident, transitioning to a live account can help you apply your skills under real market conditions.

Start Paper Trading with VT Markets Today

Ready to begin your trading journey? Start paper trading with a VT Markets demo account today using MetaTrader 4 or MetaTrader 5, two of the most powerful trading platforms available. Practice with virtual funds and explore the advanced trading tools and resources we provide to help you refine your skills. Once you’re confident in your strategies, transition to live trading with VT Markets, where you’ll enjoy competitive spreads and advanced tools that every trader needs to succeed.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What is paper trading?

Paper trading refers to simulated trading, where you practice buying and selling assets using virtual funds without any financial risk.

2. How does paper trading work?

You place real-time trades on a trading platform using simulated capital. The platform mirrors market conditions, but with no real money at stake.

3. Can paper trading help me become a better trader?

Yes, it allows you to test strategies, familiarize yourself with trading platforms, and build confidence without the fear of losing real money.

4. How do I transition from paper trading to real trading?

Start with small amounts of real money, stick to strategies that have worked in paper trading, and focus on managing your emotions effectively.

5. Can I paper trade on VT Markets?

Yes, VT Markets offers paper trading through a demo account, where you can practice with virtual funds and gain hands-on experience in real-time market conditions, all with no financial risk.

6. What’s the difference between paper trading and live trading?

While paper trading allows you to practice without financial risk, live trading involves real money and the emotional pressure that comes with it. Live trading provides real-time market feedback, while paper trading is mainly for learning and testing strategies.

7. Is paper trading the same as backtesting?

No, paper trading involves simulating trades in real-time with live market data, while backtesting applies a strategy to historical data to see how it would have performed in the past. Paper trading gives you a more realistic, real-time experience.

8. Can I trade any asset using a demo account?

Yes! With VT Markets, you can trade a wide range of assets, including stocks, forex, indices, commodities, and ETFs in your demo account, giving you the flexibility to practice across various markets.

West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil price recovered during Thursday’s Asian session, trading around $58.10 per barrel. This rebound followed a decline in US crude inventories, with stockpiles falling by 2.032 million barrels as reported by the EIA for the week ending May 2.

Nonetheless, uncertainty looms over US-China trade talks, affecting the oil market. As leading oil consumers, tensions between these nations affect sentiment, with a scheduled meeting in Switzerland aimed at reviving stalled negotiations.

Us China Trade Tensions

US President Trump stated China started the talks but opposed tariff reductions. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent set moderate expectations, seeing the meeting as a preliminary discussion step.

Despite intentions to negotiate, apprehension persists as the trade dispute threatens global oil demand. Brent crude prices rose amidst hopes of progress, although experts stress tariff resolutions are vital for demand improvement.

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell added that extended tariff policies could jeopardise economic goals. The Fed is exercising caution on interest rate changes due to the continued policy instability. While previous trade tensions have affected business confidence, the Fed identifies no pressing need for rate adjustments unless economic conditions worsen.

The initial paragraph outlines that the price of West Texas Intermediate crude saw a short-term bounce, trading near $58.10 during the Asian markets on Thursday. This was directly tied to a reported fall in US crude inventories—the US Energy Information Administration confirmed a 2.032 million-barrel drawdown for the week ending May 2. Lower inventories often tighten supply, nudging prices higher when demand remains steady, hence the minor upward movement in this case.

Impact On Market Sentiment

However, optimism remains limited. Tensions between the United States and China are still an overhang. Both countries are major consumers of oil, so when negotiations between them stall or deteriorate, the worry over future demand tends to cap any lasting price recoveries. A new round of discussions is reportedly planned in Switzerland, which could offer fresh direction depending on how talks progress. But hopes are being tempered by the officials involved.

From the US side, Trump remarked that while China had reopened the dialogue, they resisted any movement on reducing existing tariffs—something that’s been a sticking point throughout. Meanwhile, Bessent described the talks as little more than a feeling-out session. That stance suggests that any breakthrough will not come quickly, and the parties are still far from agreement.

On our end, what this puts into play is a broader sense of caution. Market participants who trade price volatility, particularly in structured products or options tied to energy pricing, should be alert to how these policy statements trickle into sentiment and positioning. At the same time, Brent crude—which often reflects global demand dynamics more than WTI—has been inching upward, but not in a way that shows any true shift in mood. Rather, it appears to be nudged by short-term risk optimism.

Powell has sounded a warning regarding the possible macroeconomic consequences of sustained tariff friction. Specifically, he noted how it complicates things for the Federal Reserve, which isn’t eager to alter rate paths unless rattled by broader disruptions. Business confidence, already sensitive due to previous trade shocks, remains on a tightrope. His measured tone implies the Fed is not poised to act unless the existing calm gives way to hardened economic indicators.

For those of us involved in derivatives tied to commodities and broader macro outcomes, the watchpoints are building. Preparedness—less in the form of directional conviction and more in terms of understanding how these overlapping macro drivers affect gamma and forward curve sentiment—will be key. If inventories continue to decline but demand signals waver due to policy instability, we could see short-lived spikes facing quick reversion.

From a volatility perspective, one should also monitor implied versus realised gap movements over the next few weeks, particularly as headline sensitivity returns to pricing. With sentiment being yanked between inventory surprises and geopolitical uncertainty, the window for premium harvesting may narrow or invert unexpectedly.

What we’re observing is a fading of last quarter’s calm. There’s no recession panic, not yet—but there are more questions being asked, and fewer answers being offered in definitive terms. That difference, at least for now, reshapes how risk is being priced.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Banco Central do Brasil has increased its Selic rate by 50 basis points, a decision that was predicted by polling. The choice was reached unanimously, and additional caution is needed for the next meeting.

A flexible approach to incorporating data that affects the inflation outlook is required. The Bank plans to stay vigilant with monetary policy, aiming to bring inflation back to target within a relevant timeframe.

Monetary Policy Calibration Factors

The calibration of this monetary policy will depend on inflation dynamics, particularly components sensitive to monetary policy and economic activity. It will also consider inflation projections, expectations, the output gap, and risk balances.

The external environment, with a focus on U.S. trade policy, and the domestic environment, especially fiscal policy, have influenced asset prices and expectations. Risks to the inflation outlook are currently higher than usual, with both upside and downside possibilities.

The global atmosphere remains adverse and uncertain, majorly due to U.S. economic policy and trade policy effects. These factors contribute to uncertainty about economic slowdown extent and inflation effects across countries. Indicators on local economic activity and the labour market still show strength, though early signs indicate a moderation in growth.

Decision Impact and Future Outlook

The Banco Central do Brasil’s decision to lift the Selic rate by 50 basis points, as expected by market participants, sends a message that priorities remain focused on price stability. By voting unanimously, the Committee demonstrated a clear, shared intention to rein in inflation. This shared direction adds confidence that no sudden shifts will arise in the short term unless data shifts meaningfully.

This tone of “additional caution” for the next gathering is more than just conservative language—it signals a readiness to pause or slow if incoming data does not reinforce the current tightening cycle. Monetary authorities are essentially saying: we know where we stand today, but tomorrow could demand adjustment depending on how inflation behaves.

Now, from a practical trading standpoint, this means close monitoring of inflation data—not just headline figures, but components that the Committee has identified as especially sensitive to interest rate movements and shifts in activity. These include services pricing, wage data, and surveys of expectations. Unlike past cycles, decision-makers appear highly focused on forward estimates, and how those match with their own models.

Despite robust local output and employment readings, it is premature to frame the domestic economy as overheating. The early signs of moderation are essential—these are likely to be the signals that policymakers will weigh when debating whether to maintain, pause, or extend current tightening. Ignore these signs, and it becomes harder to anticipate their next steps.

Outside Brazil, foreign policy—especially in Washington—casts long global shadows. Trade friction and uncertain fiscal benchmarks in the U.S. continue to pull expectations in different directions. Yields respond. Currencies adjust. Valuation gaps widen. Rates traders have seen this before: when the external environment loses predictability, local central banks lean on stability at home. That need for stability may come through stronger language, unchanged rates, or even surprise moves when volatility spikes. We don’t expect the surprises to be without warning; we just know that they react when local policy is no longer enough to steady conditions.

The current mood among inflation watchers remains high alert. Both faster price rises and unexpected drops carry weight. Notably, while most central banks worry about upside risk, Brasilia’s Committee is equally attuned to possible downswings too. This is telling. We therefore must be prepared for a wider reaction function—meaning we should expect adjustments to come from more than one side.

With each week, fixed income desks will need to ask if the balance of risks is changing. Is the primary inflation impulse still local demand? Or has foreign turbulence taken the reins? This is the frame that can help make sense of forward policy scenarios. If we see unexpected softness in core consumer prices or a shift in fiscal posture, responses could arrive more quickly than usual.

The neutral stance in the statement isn’t passive—it’s more like poised restraint. Flexibility is not a vague principle, but a stance coded into their framework. That’s what makes the calibration comment so relevant: they are telling us which parts of the data matter. Spot those, and you’ve spotted their likely direction.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

EUR/USD hovered around the 1.1300 level after the Federal Reserve’s recent rate decision. Although the interest rate hold was anticipated, Fed Chair Powell’s cautious remarks surprised the market, with hopes for rate cuts by July.

The Fed noted strong US employment and economic activity but expressed concerns over labour and output risks due to tariffs and trade uncertainties. This cautious outlook temporarily boosted EUR/USD as expectations for rate cuts rose.

Fed’s Cautious Outlook

However, Powell stated that high tariffs hinder the Fed’s goals, suggesting it may maintain current rates. While tariffs have affected consumer and business sentiment, economic data has not shown substantial negative impacts, complicating immediate rate decisions.

Market expectations foresee a quarter-point rate cut in July, though the probability of stable rates has grown to 30%. EUR/USD appears to have interim support above 1.1200, awaiting market updates for strong directional moves.

The Euro is the Eurozone currency, second only to the US Dollar in global trades, constituting 31% of forex transactions in 2022. The European Central Bank influences its value through interest rates and monetary policy aimed at price stability.

Eurozone inflation is tracked by the Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices (HICP), with significant economic indicators including GDP, PMIs, and employment data impacting its value. The Trade Balance also affects the Euro, with positive balances bolstering and negative balances weakening the currency.

Rate Expectations and Market Reaction

What the existing content tells us is fairly clear: the EUR/USD exchange rate nudged closer to 1.1300, driven less by actual changes in policy and more by shifting expectations. The Federal Open Market Committee left rates on hold—which was widely predicted—but Powell’s tone threw much of the market off balance. His remarks had a cautious edge, which traders read as leaving the door open to lower rates in the near future. That, in turn, lifted EUR/USD somewhat, given that lower US interest rates tend to weigh on the dollar.

Although US economic data has been generally steady—strong employment numbers, solid output growth—the Fed remains wary of external pressures, particularly from new and proposed tariff measures. Powell flagged these as interfering with the committee’s ability to meet its economic goals. What’s interesting is that, while the actual macro indicators haven’t deteriorated meaningfully, the potential for damage might be priced into future expectations, particularly in how firms and consumers are feeling. That tension continues to blur the picture of what the Fed may do next.

Now, what matters for us is how rates are likely to move and what that means for price action. Futures markets currently predict a 25 basis point cut by July, but we have seen that conviction soften; implied probabilities show about 30% chance of no move. That puts us in a rhythm of watching high-frequency data releases inch by inch. Any unanticipated economic weakness in the US could nudge rate cut odds higher—supportive for EUR/USD. Conversely, stronger-than-expected prints would likely dampen that prospect and weigh on the pair.

From the European side, inflation remains a critical input. The Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices continues to guide ECB decisions, alongside PMIs and GDP prints. The central bank has room to adjust policy only if inflation deviates meaningfully from its current path. Employment and trade data also factor into assessments, but for now, there’s no indication that the ECB will act ahead of the Fed.

In terms of immediate levels, EUR/USD has held above 1.1200 in recent sessions. That’s become a short-term floor, at least until we get top-tier releases or monetary policy shifts. From our vantage point, option positioning appears trapped between growing uncertainty and established technical boundaries. Short-dated implied volatilities remain relatively tame, which adds to the sense of inertia in spot—though this calm can turn swiftly with sharper moves in US data or unexpected ECB commentary.

What we’re really watching for is any early signal—be it from a Fed speech or surprise inflation reading—that might flip the rate expectations narrative. Near-term price movement will likely remain bound until market conviction builds more decisively in one direction. Delta scalers should remain closely aligned to breakouts, as gamma exposure against well-defined strikes could be in play.

In the coming sessions, attention should be placed on whether rising speculative interest in the Euro, partly fuelled by less hawkish Fed pricing, is sustainable. We should assess how core flows adjust, particularly long-term corporate hedging and ex-US reserve diversification. Any pivot away from the dollar by these groups could reinforce directional EUR demand even absent policy change.

For now, direction is hesitating, but the structure of rates pricing and volatility positioning is shifting just beneath the surface. Traders should be alert to shifts in expectations even before the data confirms them. Sometimes moves begin in sentiment well ahead of the economic release.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

South Korea’s foreign exchange reserves experienced a decline of nearly $5 billion in April, reaching $404.67 billion. This marked the lowest reserve level since April 2020, as measures were undertaken to stabilise currency markets amid ongoing trade tensions.

The Bank of Korea identified FX swap operations with the national pension fund as a primary reason for the reserves’ reduction. These operations were intended to address and alleviate the demand for dollars in the market.

Korean Won’s Recovery

During this period, the Korean won saw a recovery, gaining 3.3% in April. This rebound followed a temporary fall to a 16-year low, influenced by new U.S. tariff policies.

Given recent interventions by the Bank of Korea, what we’re observing is a deliberate and somewhat expected shift in reserve positioning. Relying on FX swap agreements with the national pension fund isn’t just an indirect method of injecting dollar liquidity—it’s a clear signal that adjustments in policy tools are being deployed to moderate abrupt currency moves without tapping heavily into outright sales of foreign assets.

FX reserves dipping to levels not seen since the early stages of the pandemic might feel uncomfortable, but framing this within the scope of temporary liquidity management paints a different picture. Such tools aren’t typically used unless short-term funding stress in the dollar market justifies them. That stress, at least over recent weeks, was prompted largely by dollar strength globally, combined with narrowed capital inflows. The context provided by the pension-related swaps shows an intention to balance that divergence without amplifying market volatility.

Lee’s institution is effectively signalling that it remains responsive without being reactive. While some might see health in the won’s 3.3% rebound, there’s little in recent price action to suggest it was entirely organic. The recovery, following a drop to multi-year lows, stemmed as much from tactical market stabilisation as from broader macro improvements. More specifically, that bounce took place amid changes in U.S. trade policy which temporarily shifted capital positioning back to Asia.

Focus On Swap Interventions

Given this backdrop, we find it more prudent to price in two key conditions: first, continued pressure on reserves may still appear in May’s figures unless the pension swap line is restructured or allowed to expire; second, won-based assets could remain prone to sharp directional moves if trade policy clarity doesn’t materialise. The absence of aggressive dollar selling from the Bank of Korea, replaced instead by swap interventions, hints that the authorities are closely tracking foreign appetite and hedging mismatches rather than purely exchange rate targets.

Traders assessing near-dated positioning would do well to monitor the maturity profile and scale of these swaps, less for their absolute impact and more for their timing. If rollovers or adjustments occur before major U.S. policy updates or external debt settlements, intraday rate gaps could widen, even if short-term vol stays compressed. Park’s approach, rooted in preserving optionality, reflects a broader strategic preference for keeping real money investors steady while keeping speculative capital in check.

Given the timing of this action—right around the peak of cross-border funding demand in April—we’ve flagged cross-currency basis moves as a leading signal of potential interventions. Observing smaller adjustments in those levels moving forward might confirm that the worst of short-term stress has passed, though this doesn’t allay deeper concerns tied to trade dependencies.

Ultimately, attention in the coming sessions would be best placed not on the spot level, but on the forward curves and swap differential shifts, which now more accurately reflect demand for hedging versus directional views. As participants, this is where our focus should remain.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Switzerland’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate remained constant at 2.8% in April. This figure has shown no change compared to previous months, maintaining stability in the country’s labour market.

The Australian Dollar rebounded past 0.6450, assisted by a positive global risk tone and a rate cut in China. Meanwhile, the US Dollar struggled despite a hawkish stance by the Federal Reserve, affecting trade relations with China.

Usd Jpy Trading Influences

USD/JPY traded near 143.50, influenced by geopolitical risks and a weaker US Dollar, following comments from the Bank of Japan’s Governor. The Japanese Yen’s strength continued to weigh on the pair amid ongoing uncertainties.

Gold prices held at around $3,400, with buying sentiment supported by US-China trade uncertainties. The US President indicated no urgency in resolving trade issues, impacting market optimism.

Cryptocurrency markets experienced slight growth, with total sector valuation exceeding $3.1 trillion. Bitcoin surged past $97.5K, driven by shifts in the Federal Open Market Committee’s monetary policy.

The FOMC maintained interest rates at 4.25%-4.50%, aligning with market expectations. This decision reflects ongoing caution in the economic environment, as stakeholders assess potential fiscal implications.

Fomc Rate Expectations

The FOMC holding rates at 4.25% to 4.50% was in line with what most expected going into the week. We view the decision as a marker of continued patience from policymakers, possibly indicating they’re not yet convinced inflation has returned to the desired path. For short-term rate instruments, it limits any sharp repricings—for now. However, the wording from Powell suggests flexibility remains on the table, so volatility could resurface with minimal provocation. We should read this as a short-term pause, not a sign that monetary tightening is finished. Fixed income markets have already priced this in, but option markets may still carry some moderate skew depending on how inflation data lands in the coming sessions.

Gold’s ability to hold above $3,400 brings to mind how reliable it’s become as a hedge amid geopolitical noise and uncertain macro outcomes. Conditions out of East Asia—particularly from trade policy and diplomatic rhetoric—are being re-assessed regularly by the market. With leadership on both sides suggesting no rush to unwind tariffs or rekindle aggressive talks, appetite for non-interest-bearing assets like gold lingers. Traders might consider volatility strategies here, particularly with implied pricing for hard assets diverging from realised moves. Positioning remains light, which adds to the probability of sharp moves in either direction if headlines shift unexpectedly.

USD/JPY’s move near 143.50 looks steady at first glance, but there’s a mix of forces battling underneath. While the US Dollar’s sluggishness reflects weariness driven by dovish tones from Washington, the Yen is being somewhat propped up by subtle but impactful comments from Ueda. Traders should remember that Japan’s central bank is still reluctant to commit to a timeline on policy tweaks. We don’t expect a sudden recalibration, but continued strength in the Yen could complicate things further downstream. Leverage on that pair merits tightening until new signals emerge. Keep exposure responsive rather than predictive.

In crypto, the sector valuation pushing through $3.1 trillion could embolden capital rotation from altcoins into higher-market-cap assets. Bitcoin crossing $97,500 grabs attention, but the driver is less technical and more tied to maturing expectations about real rates. When the FOMC softens guidance, as seen recently, digital asset traders often interpret this as supporting risk. Nonetheless, volumes remain hesitantly low considering the price levels. It’s becoming clear that enthusiasm for digital assets isn’t spreading evenly—suggesting we may see more polarisation here, most likely in derivative pricing. Rates desks might pay close attention to how liquidity pools behave near round price numbers, especially above $100K.

On the other side of the globe, Switzerland’s unemployment holding at 2.8% doesn’t alter much in terms of macroeconomic signals, but it reinforces that the labour market is no immediate concern. No contraction, no overheating—this spells reliability. Local data isn’t triggering volatility across EUR/CHF, which opens the door for carry-focused strategies in the region to continue as they have.

Elsewhere, strength in the Australian Dollar above 0.6450 seems more reactive than structural, boosted by optimism following monetary easing in China. That move from the PBOC has implications for yield differentials, and the Aussie is often one of the first to respond in Asia-Pacific. Still, we’ve noticed that any tailwind from China tends to have a limited half-life unless backed by follow-through from commodity demand. Spot traders may wish to adjust expectations down slightly, as risk-on sentiment is uneven globally. Option traders could look into selling topside vol, at least temporarily.

The overall tilt remains data-driven, with traders likely to reward clarity and punish ambiguity. Repricing is being fuelled not by sudden changes but by nudges in narrative—from central banks, from geopolitical developments, and from expectations around liquidity. In this environment, keeping size modest and leaning into noisy reversals could serve us better than chasing broader moves. We’ll stay focused on clarity from upcoming inflation prints and any unscheduled communications from policymakers before re-engaging more aggressively.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The strained functioning of global markets poses challenges. Supply-side impacts from tariffs are projected to affect New Zealand.

There is uncertainty regarding the realignment of the global economy’s framework due to tariffs. This uncertainty primarily affects confidence levels.

New Zealands Labour Market

New Zealand’s labour market data reflects a subdued economy. The unemployment rate stood at 5.1%, compared to the expected 5.3%.

The Reserve Bank of New Zealand is likely to reduce its projections for global economic activity. This adjustment is driven by current global economic conditions.

Market reactions to the softer unemployment figure have been relatively modest. Although 5.1% is technically better than anticipated, the improvement is disappointing when examined in the context of falling job creation. Real wage growth continues to stagnate, which puts downward pressure on household spending. With private consumption making up a large share of GDP, any contraction there will weigh on broader output levels.

This backdrop presents a narrowing window for policymakers. With the Reserve Bank inclined to scale back growth forecasts, the likelihood of further monetary easing becomes more plausible. That said, accommodative policy alone cannot counterbalance diminishing external demand or prolonged trade disruption. What we’ve seen so far points to a slowing environment rather than an abrupt correction, though complacency would be misplaced.

Policymaker Challenges

Orr’s team faces a difficult task in deciding when to intervene and by how much. Policy missteps at this point could accentuate economic fragility rather than contain it. We’re already looking at divergence in rate expectations between central banks. That divergence matters more this month, especially for relative value positioning in swap spreads and the OIS curve.

Short-end pricing reflects a growing sense that inflation is unlikely to return to target ranges any time soon. That brings attention back to the volatility surface, which has started to flatten in recent sessions. If realised market moves remain muted despite underlying risks, there’s logic in favouring long volatility expressions. Timing and tenor selection will matter, particularly as overnight indexed forward markets begin adjusting to any hawkish pivots abroad.

The recent adjustments in long bonds also require assessment. The steepening that followed last week’s commodity data hints at duration sensitivity to input prices. Still, with forward guidance barely shifting, more persistent changes in the long end would need confirmation by way of core inflation or structural employment shifts. Neither appears imminent.

Elsewhere, cross-market correlations are breaking down. Traditional hedges are delivering less predictable results, interrupting otherwise reliable arbitrage paths. When uncertainty stems from policy behaviour rather than just data misses, the standard filters for risk calibration tend to fail. We must adjust for that in our implied-volatility assumptions and recalibrate delta exposure accordingly.

The coming fortnight includes several event risks that may shift base-rate expectations. If Jackson’s speech from last quarter is anything to go by, it wouldn’t surprise anyone to see more fuss about neutral rate estimation. A reminder: any shift in equilibrium rate thinking tends to extend beyond short-term forecasting. The adjustment filters into the whole curve. Again, we must be quicker to reflect those changes in our forward pricing models.

Weekly positioning data shows a reduced appetite for directional exposure in rate markets. That’s not inertia—it reflects caution. As spreads compress and carry trades lose their appeal, capital is rotating into synthetic structures. Here, skew remains minor; there’s value to be found by widening the halo around central strikes. We keep hearing that risk is tilting one way, but such statements overlook the timing constraints that face leverage-adjusted positions. Without an immediate trigger, optionality must be kept modular and unwindable.

In essence, we’re operating in a time where central policy, trade relations, and local data fail to align neatly. When the parts move in different directions and respond to different signals, linear models break down. That’s precisely the moment when judgment starts outperforming automation. Behavioral shifts in markets are visible before they become measurable. We should keep our ears closer to the floor than to the ceiling.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Mexican Peso gained against the US Dollar as the US Federal Reserve held interest rates steady. The USD/MXN traded at 19.61, dropping by 0.26%.

The Fed maintained rates between 4.25%-4.50% for the third consecutive meeting, pointing to economic uncertainties and dual mandate risks. Fed Chair Jerome Powell stated the current monetary policy is suitable and emphasized readiness to adjust if needed.

Fed’s Position and Impact

Powell noted the Fed would act if economic conditions threaten one of its mandates but deemed it premature to prioritise. Following the Fed’s decision, USD/MXN initially rose to 19.67 before declining.

Mexico’s April CPI is anticipated on May 8, with Banxico expected to reduce rates on May 15, despite inflation concerns. The core CPI is projected to increase from 3.64% in March to 3.90%.

Market data suggests a predicted easing towards 2025’s end, while external economic challenges remain. The Peso’s technical outlook shows a bearish trend, with the USD/MXN finding support at 19.50 and potential resistance at 19.78.

Major influences on the Peso include Mexico’s economic performance, central bank policy, and geopolitical trends. Low interest rates generally weaken MXN, whereas high rates are beneficial. Economic data and risk sentiment also affect the currency’s value.

Short Term Positioning

The recent stability in Federal Reserve rates has created a defined yet delicate window in which short-term positioning could shift rapidly. By maintaining interest rates while acknowledging that economic risks still exist on both sides of its mandate—employment and price stability—Powell reaffirmed the ongoing caution much of the market had already priced in. Notably, he dismissed speculation about immediate directional shifts in policy. Although there was an initial spike in USD/MXN to 19.67, the decline that followed illustrates low confidence in a sustained dollar rally under these current rate conditions. Moves such as these often signal that speculative positioning is either thinning out or reassessing forward risk.

From a monetary policy perspective, Banxico appears likely to take a divergent route from the Fed. While Fed policymakers proceed with patience, Mexico’s central bank may begin cutting rates as soon as next week, despite persistent worries around underlying inflation. The projected uptick in core CPI—from March’s 3.64% to 3.90%—might normally suggest caution. However, with headline figures softening and broader growth measures leaning sluggish, rate cuts remain probable. A shift like this often dampens currency value over time, particularly against central banks maintaining a tighter stance.

On the technical front, there’s now clearer structure. Support around 19.50 has begun acting as a reliable base in spot trading, and the failure to break through 19.78 implies restrained bullish momentum. For those watching option flows and implied volatilities, this presents an attractive environment to structure directional strategies that hedge around a narrow range. Standard breakout trades are less viable without a firm catalyst. Instead, attention should turn to calendar spreads or low-delta positions that benefit from compression in volatility.

Broader sentiment continues to weigh on the Peso as well. Global investors are tracking external demand dips and supply chain distortions, both of which kneecap emerging market currencies even without domestic weakness. Coupled with potential softening from Banxico, there’s a shrinking incentive to hold long Peso exposure unless it’s part of a funding pair against falling yield currencies. It’s also worth examining the risk sentiment across other Latin American FX to gauge potential contagion or divergence.

The narrowing gap between Mexican and US interest rates is a critical variable that must be watched closely. When domestic yields fall below prevailing inflation expectations, the Peso usually reacts negatively—particularly in flat risk environments. That said, short positioning may become overextended swiftly, especially if local inflation data underwhelms. This week’s data could accelerate expectations for rate cuts, but it’s equally capable of catching markets off guard and sending short positions into losses.

Overall, directional traders might consider reducing leverage through mid-May. This current backdrop calls for more nuance—opportunities likely remain, but they hide in the details of macroeconomic releases and policy timing. Any hint of delay from Banxico or stronger-than-expected CPI surprises could reset trajectories very quickly.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Federal Reserve announced no change in interest rates on May 7, 2025, acknowledging increased risks of higher unemployment and inflation. Chair Jerome Powell emphasised a cautious and data-dependent approach in his remarks, describing the economy as “solid” yet facing elevated uncertainty. Powell pointed out that consumer and business sentiment have declined, with many postponing significant decisions in response to recent policy changes, such as tariffs.

US stock markets initially fluctuated but ultimately closed higher after President Trump announced he would not enforce AI diffusion rules on chip exports, positively affecting chip stocks. The Dow, S&P, and Nasdaq indices gained 0.70%, 0.43%, and 0.27% respectively. Meanwhile, US Treasury yields fell across all terms, with significant drops in the 10-year and 30-year bonds. Crude oil and gold prices both fell, by 1.95% and 1.99%, respectively. Bitcoin saw a decrease, ending the day $420 lower.

The Fed’s Cautious Stance

The Fed’s stance maintains caution, with Powell reiterating the flexibility of current monetary policy to respond appropriately. He stressed that the costs of waiting for greater clarity in economic conditions are low, and no immediate adjustments to interest rates are foreseen.

The Federal Reserve’s decision to leave interest rates unchanged, despite concerns about both inflation sticking around and job losses rising, highlights a deliberate choice to prioritise stability over swift action. Powell’s tone, notably less firm than in prior months, points to an awareness that pushing further too soon could unsettle what’s left of consumer confidence and business planning.

What we’re seeing now is a pause, not so much because things are steady, but because recent economic data haven’t sent a clear enough message in either direction. Inflation isn’t falling quickly, but it also isn’t climbing in the way that would spark emergency tightening. At the same time, Powell flagged a decline in sentiment—from both consumers and businesses—which serves as a warning that higher borrowing costs and trade-related disruptions could already be applying pressure beneath the surface.

Implications for Market Participants

What’s important here is how this backdrop shapes the short-term behaviour of institutional participants in the derivatives space. The movement in US Treasury yields—where the 10- and 30-year bonds both dropped sharply—suggests that fixed income traders have begun to anticipate slower growth. This implies expectations of rate reductions rather than hikes over the coming quarters. The steepening of this curve in recent sessions opens the door for strategies built around volatility at the long end, especially if further signs of economic slowing continue to emerge.

The reaction in equities, particularly the strength in chipmakers following the update on AI hardware rules, indicates that headline-sensitive sectors will remain highly reactive. However, the modest gains across major indices also signal underlying hesitancy. These aren’t moves driven by conviction; they’re about small reallocations waiting for better clarity.

For those of us looking at implied volatility levels and skew, it’s worth noting that despite stocks closing green, gold and crude sliding suggests risk appetite isn’t uniform. That tends to create pricing mismatches, especially across asset class options. More so, Bitcoin’s $420 drop—while not dramatic—confirms that alternative assets, too, are being reevaluated in light of central bank inaction. It’s not about one asset class leading the others; it’s about a general hesitance, a risk-off tone that’s creeping in unpredictably.

At the moment, Powell’s repeated mention of a ‘flexible policy’ offers little room for those seeking rate directionality trades. Instead, we should watch closely how forward guidance gets priced in, particularly via the OIS curve. Mispricings there tend to precede option repricings in short-duration instruments. For now, data events and tariff implications seem to be packing more weight into short-term vol than longer-term macro shifts, which means strategies should align accordingly.

Staying too directional risks being whipsawed. Instead, there’s real opportunity in relative value: rate differentials between maturities, sector-specific equities versus index positions, or even cross-asset implieds with mismatched expectations. None of these require big macro conviction, just clarity in positioning and a nimble touch.

The next few weeks, with Powell having signalled no urgency and markets responding more to incremental headlines than sweeping moves, could be fertile ground for positioning around wait-and-see sentiment. Weakness in physical commodities alongside steady rates sets up interesting contango dynamics to exploit. Giving attention to these interactions, and how traders collectively price uncertainty, will likely yield more than betting on policy changes alone.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.