Alphabet’s stock has decreased by more than 7.50% after Apple’s Eddy Cue mentioned a drop in search and browser usage since April. Apple is now considering adding AI-powered search features to its browsers, potentially affecting Alphabet’s revenue-sharing agreement for Google searches on iOS devices.

Following this news, Alphabet’s shares fell by $13.65, an 8.41% decrease, bringing the price to $149.50. The selloff caused the stock to dip below both its 50-day moving average of $160.66 and the 38.2% retracement level at $159.79 from the rally starting November 2022 to February 2025. From its peak, Alphabet’s stock is down by 27.5% and has lost 20.71% this year.

Technical Support Levels

Despite staying above its 2025 low of $140.53 from April 7, important technical support levels are at $147.22 and $145.20. The steep drop underscores growing concerns as AI technologies, such as ChatGPT, impact traditional search usage. Alphabet faces challenges as it adapts with its main business under pressure.

As we examine the details provided above, it’s clear that a sharp shift in sentiment toward Alphabet has triggered notable technical weaknesses in the stock. The decline was provoked not simply by a drop in value, but by a trifecta of price action crossing under key support indicators. The stock first broke beneath its 50-day moving average, an often-watched marker of medium-term trend direction. More materially, it slipped under the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement from its two-year rally span—often viewed by traders as a natural first line of defense in a pullback.

When price breaks under both levels simultaneously, and particularly when accompanied by a decline of more than 8% in a single session, it tells us there’s no casual interpretation to be had. According to recent behavior, the stock has lost over a quarter from its highs and nearly 21% on the year, effectively erasing most of the optimism that had built up around its earlier rally.

Traders Need a Decisive Approach

There is still some bounce room, with levels at $147.22 and $145.20 acting as near-term supports. A small climb might occur near these points, possibly pausing the downside momentum temporarily. However, if pressure continues—especially if sentiment keeps wavering—the next testing area will likely be around the early-April low just south of $141.00. Below that, we’d be retracing closer to longer-term foundational zones rather than transient breathing spaces.

What this means going forward is that traders need a decisive approach. We should be watching for whether the price retests the broken 50-day average from below, a move that might trigger short-covering or encourage fresh positioning on expectations of a partial recovery. If that re-test fails or volume thins, however, it suggests bulls are temporarily stepping away, and weaker hands are taking control. That usually favours directional trades rather than neutral ones.

There’s also the wider issue of revenue exposure tied to third-party partnerships. The uncertainty that surrounds moves by other firms to integrate alternative AI search functionalities might not be baked into expectations fully. If that stream is interrupted or restructured, forward earnings projections may have to be revised. When earnings paths shift, so too do implied volatility assumptions. We should not ignore that possibility. These changing conditions offer increased directional skews in option pricing—for sellers or buyers with a short-term time horizon, that opens up opportunity.

We wouldn’t necessarily chase the move after such a stark gap, but the possibility of a multi-day continuation lower still stands if initial recovery attempts stall above key resistance. Indeed, any attempt to reclaim prior levels must be backstopped by volume or news flow that restores conviction. Right now, that’s uncertain.

As directional flows react over the coming sessions, especially heading into the next options expiry window, focus should stay on volume-led shifts near $147 and $145. If those levels hold, a rebound might be probable, albeit muted. If they don’t, we’re likely poised for further retracement, perhaps even closer toward the 50% level of the previous rally, depending on macro factors.

Volatility assumptions will remain elevated, especially with headline risk present. In such conditions, defined-risk structures should be prioritised. Keep stops tight and bias toward setups with a clear asymmetric payout. We should remain cautious of whipsaw moves that may develop around key technical levels, especially with any further statements or strategic changes from the companies involved.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US Tariffs and EU Challenges

The EU faces challenges from US tariffs, prompting the European Commission to consider countermeasures as trade negotiations progress. EU Retail Sales decreased by 0.1% in March, failing to meet expectations, with year-on-year growth at 1.5%, below the forecast of 1.6%.

Market participants anticipate the Fed will maintain interest rates at 4.25%-4.50%. Nonfarm Payroll data shows solid job growth, limiting rate cut options for the Fed. The US Dollar Index stabilises around 99.55, awaiting outcomes from the US-China trade talks, which are crucial for easing tensions in their ongoing trade conflict. EUR/USD hovers near 1.1370, with key resistance at 1.1500 and support at 1.1214.

What we see here is a currency pair essentially parked in neutral, despite several moving parts both in North America and Europe. The EUR/USD is holding near 1.1370, balanced by shifts on either side of the Atlantic. On one hand, there’s expectation that the Federal Reserve will keep policy tight for now—most likely leaving rates within the upper 4% range—while still facing pressure from resilient labour figures. On the other, there’s the European Central Bank pointing squarely towards continued monetary easing. Not much push in either direction for the euro just yet, though tension is building just under the surface.

With Merz now installed in Berlin, the assumption is a certain policy certainty will benefit both investor sentiment and business conditions in Europe’s largest economy. He is unlikely to shift from Germany’s typically conservative fiscal approach, though the real test will lie in how upcoming industrial and consumer data respond over the next quarter. If purchasing demand fails to shift upwards meaningfully, the ECB may accelerate its rate cut timeline, giving added weight to its dovish signalling. That could anchor the single currency further, especially if growth expectations in major member states remain subdued.

Impact of German Industrial Orders

Retail figures within the EU gave little to cheer about—with March’s contraction, albeit a minor one, falling short of forecasts. A weak print isn’t damning on its own, though back-to-back disappointments might begin to influence trader bias more sharply. In the current setup, small macro readings—particularly any from Germany or France—will likely get outsized attention. We should position accordingly.

The Federal Reserve, by contrast, has more room to wait, because American hiring data continues to surprise. Payrolls haven’t shown signs of real fatigue, which restricts the Fed’s justification to pivot sooner than markets initially expected. Interest rate traders looking for early 2024 cuts have been slowly scaling back bets, and that’s been helping the dollar to hold its footing just under the 100 mark on the DXY. Any softening around inflation or consumption could reprice longer-term expectations, but so far the evidence isn’t there. As for US-China relations, they mostly hang in low-grade uncertainty. If negotiations falter, defensive positioning may increase across both equities and currency futures.

Taking note of 1.1500 as resistance and 1.1214 as support for EUR/USD, we are roughly mid-channel and in wait-and-see mode. That matters for short-dated contracts in particular, as implied volatility is currently understated relative to headline risk. Stretching positioning without confirmation, especially ahead of the Fed’s statement, looks premature. Hawklike tones out of Washington would compress the pair towards its lower barrier. On the flip side, any dovish surprise—say, a rollback in quantitative tightening targets—might challenge that 1.15 ceiling more decisively.

From our perspective, watching the speed and sequencing of ECB messaging in the next fortnight offers more information than larger averages. Each rate path already diverges, but the language from Lagarde and company could tilt directional plays. Additionally, German industrial orders or forward-looking PMI figures can quickly sharpen risk edges. The dollar’s drivers, meanwhile, are very much domestic—for now. Short-term prospects are likely binary post-Fed: status quo and support remains; dovish hints and the greenback could soften.

Our present stance would favour keeping premium exposure light, with option structures more attractive than outright direction at current levels. Higher data sensitivity weeks often precede breakouts—not during them. Patience may turn out to be productive.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The AUDUSD experienced a downward shift after initially surpassing the 0.6504 swing high, now challenging the 200-day moving average at 0.6460. A drop below this mark could indicate further downward movement towards the 0.6428 level.

Previously, the pair momentarily exceeded the 0.6504 swing high set in December 2024, but the advance lacked momentum, leading to a reversal. This suggests that the market did not sustain the push past resistance, resulting in increased selling pressure.

Current Market Conditions

Currently, the pair is hovering around the 200-day moving average and retesting at 0.6460. Should the price fall beneath this and the 100-hour MA at 0.6452, it may approach the 200-hour MA at 0.6428.

A swing area from 0.6429 to 0.6442 is a crucial zone for determining the short-term trend. Maintaining this area could provide buyers with a foundation for another increase attempt, whereas a drop below could favour sellers.

Notable levels to monitor:

Resistance: 0.6504 (failed breakout zone), 0.6514 (new high for 2025)

Support: 0.6460 (200-day MA), 0.6452 (100-hour MA), 0.6428 (200-hour MA), 0.6429–0.6442 (swing area)

What we have seen recently is a failed attempt to maintain a move above 0.6504—an area that in December acted as a ceiling and has now demonstrated its authority once more. The inability to stay above this level has led to a pullback, and by now the price is testing more medium-term measures of balance. The 200-day moving average at 0.6460 is being scrutinised by the market, and its role as a dividing line between strength and weakness is being put to the test.

Price Activity and Market Expectations

The latest price activity tells us there’s been a softening of bullish pressure after an attempted break above resistance lacked depth, and the retreat has pressed the price back into a more neutral territory. A continuation lower that breaks cleanly beneath both the 200-day and the nearby 100-hour moving averages would likely uncover more selling, and with that, open the way towards the 200-hour mark near 0.6428. That level fits inside a range we’ve been watching closely, between 0.6429 and 0.6442. It’s a zone that’s provided both strong floors and failed bounces—essentially, a battleground for short-term positioning.

If this zone gives way, there’s little in the way of immediate barriers to halt further decline. The reaction here will tell us plenty about what’s left of buying interest. We are keen to see whether the pair can hold this area again or whether the weight of recent selling has shifted expectations amongst participants.

The levels above—the failed 0.6504 move and the newer 2025 high at 0.6514—will matter only if the current slide stabilises and is followed by a well-backed recovery. Until then, bias remains with the downside, particularly if lower averages start acting as resistance rather than support.

Traders should expect erratic movement around these technical boundaries, especially if short-term timeframes begin to align with more entrenched directional cues. Given recent price behaviour, we’ll be focusing not just on where price settles, but how aggressively it moves through these key averages. Prominent rejections or swift breaks can guide confidence in timing exposure.

With momentum cooling and a failed push now behind us, priorities likely change. We are watching more than just the next tick. The structure of each attempt—failing or succeeding—tells us where weight is being placed within the market. If the 200-hour area is tested with weak follow-through from buyers, we know where positioning is going. If price bounces strongly off the base, then upward interest is attempting its hand again, but it must do so with conviction, or else the burden of proof remains with bulls.

Expect pullbacks to be measured by their recovery pace, and rally attempts to be judged by volume and reaction near the recent swing highs. Until decisive movement emerges, the preference leans towards probing weakness rather than chasing momentum. Volatility around the moving averages should not be surprising—this is where short-duration commitments often collide.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The United States Energy Information Administration reported a crude oil stocks change of -2.032 million barrels. This figure is greater than the expected -2.5 million barrels.

Following Jerome Powell’s statements, EUR/USD moved close to 1.1300, affected by a stronger US Dollar. Similarly, GBP/USD approached 1.3300 due to the firming US Dollar.

Gold Prices And Cryptocurrency Movements

Gold prices dropped to near $3,360, influenced by a robust US Dollar and upcoming US-China trade talks. In cryptocurrency news, TRON, NEO, VeChain, and Conflux saw slight gains, while OKB dipped slightly.

The Federal Open Market Committee maintained the federal funds rate at 4.25%-4.50%. This decision aligns with widespread expectations.

For traders, several top brokers in 2025 offer competitive spreads and fast execution for those trading EUR/USD or interested in cost-conscious trading. Various broker guides provide insights on leverage, MT4 platforms, and support for Islamic accounts.

Trading foreign exchange involves high risk and leverage can be challenging, which may not suit everyone. It’s crucial to evaluate one’s financial situation and consult a financial advisor if unsure. Understanding all potential risks is essential before engaging in foreign exchange trading.

Oil Market Signals And Currency Fluctuations

The Energy Information Administration’s release showing a crude inventory drop of just over two million barrels—somewhat less than markets had projected—suggests demand isn’t yet flagging despite broader economic tightening. When this sort of draw comes in below expectations, it often hints that supplies aren’t drying up quite as fast as previously believed, especially if refinery utilisation remains high. This can soften bullish momentum, even in a declining inventory scenario. We interpreted that as a subtle shift in tone. Brent and WTI traders may find themselves recalibrating short-term risk after this, especially going into the next OPEC+ statement.

On the currency front, Powell’s comments contributed to renewed strength in the US Dollar, pushing both EUR and GBP lower relative to recent trading ranges. The euro inching towards 1.1300 and sterling not far from 1.3300 highlights how sensitive both pairs remain to rate sentiment. Powell didn’t issue any unexpected directions, but his reaffirmation of current policy seemed enough to re-anchor expectations in favour of dollar strength. In terms of positioning, we’ve continued to see large options contracts around these levels, which will likely attract flows and keep implied volatility bid near term.

Gold’s reaction to a sturdier dollar and re-energised trade discussions between Washington and Beijing has been sharp. The retreat towards $3,360 implies a clear re-pricing of near-term inflation hedges, as well as an easing risk premium around geopolitical tensions. From a derivatives standpoint, forward curve flattening and higher delta hedging costs stand out. Traders in commodity options may look to adjust their greeks accordingly, particularly with CTA flows showing lower engagement recently. Spot traders should also note that ETF holdings have steadied after outflows last week — a signal not to be overlooked.

In crypto, the marginal gains logged in names like TRON and VeChain suggest speculative appetite has not completely faded, even if broader sentiment stayed restrained. Conflux moving in tandem shows a clustering effect, indicating possible technician-led moves rather than fundamentals. On the other side, OKB’s decline—though minor—shouldn’t be ignored. We’ve often seen such divergences lead to short-term dislocations that can offer tactical entry points for futures or perps. Monitoring funding rates and open interest shifts can provide clearer conviction here.

The FOMC’s rate decision was, as anticipated, a hold. The range at 4.25%-4.50% remains steady, yet market response shows participants weren’t entirely settled beforehand. Short-term volatility around announcements like this gives reason to keep risk tight. What’s worth watching now is any shift in terminal rate expectations, particularly as more members lean towards a prolonged plateau in policy.

Overall, spreads in major currency pairs such as EUR/USD remain tight across key brokerages we’ve used, but execution speed and slippage handling still vary. Frequent recalibration of leverage, especially when trading around scheduled news events, is sensible. With risk-adjusted margins tightening, it’s helpful to stress-test strategies even on demo accounts before stepping into livelier phases of the session.

Managing leverage without fully understanding swap costs or how margin calls operate can invite rapid balance erosion. From our experience, having safety thresholds—not just hard stops—helps. That means using contingent orders or tiered exits, particularly during high-impact releases. Trading isn’t just about getting the direction right—it’s about staying solvent while doing so.

Getting familiar with documentation and costs associated with one’s broker platform remains practical, particularly when trading synthetics, metals, or FX crosses off-standard hours. Not all liquidity is created equal. And with volatility expanding intermittently, it pays to keep monitoring liquidity books and spreads across sessions, especially the Asian and London overlaps.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Apple’s Vice President of Services, Eddie Cue, has indicated that Apple is considering incorporating AI into search browsers. This development has produced an impact on the stock market, with the NASDAQ dropping approximately 59 points or 0.33% to 17,631, and the S&P slipping into the red.

The announcement has affected Google’s stock, with shares falling by $7.61 or 4.5% to $156.00. Additionally, Microsoft’s shares experienced a decrease of $1.00 or 0.25%, now standing at $432.65.

Apple And Search Engines

Apple currently pays Google a fee each time a user clicks on Google’s services. This arrangement is believed to be a factor in the observed decline in Google shares.

What this essentially means is that Apple may be preparing to shift from simply offering access to existing search engines towards building or integrating some form of artificial intelligence-driven search. Cue’s comment suggested more than mere exploration—it appeared confident, forward-looking, and deliberate. The potential implications go beyond tech; they ripple through revenue forecasts and competitive agreements.

To break it down, Google’s share decline reflects concern over losing a high-value partner. At present, every time someone searches on Safari and clicks through Google’s results, it generates passive income for Google. If Apple begins routing some of that user activity through its own tool, even in stages, the expected traffic to Google could decline. In this area of online advertising, volume matters and so does placement. A hit to future traffic translates directly into earnings pressure.

Now, with Microsoft only nudging lower, investors seem to believe its stake in Bing and other AI-related ventures remains relatively insulated, even if temporarily. The small slip may just be collateral movement from the wider sentiment around AI in search. It could also suggest markets are wondering whether Microsoft’s own arrangements with third-party software or hardware firms might come under pressure later on.

Impact On Market Trends

So, in terms of trading the weeks ahead, the shift in directional risk becomes clearer. We are watching a recalibration in where AI development intersects with distribution rights and long-term user behaviour. If Apple accelerates its work, current dependency chains across the online ad economy could begin to look shaky. That’s where the price action starts to lead institutional sentiment.

The contraction in Google’s price, by over four percent, should not be seen as merely reactive. We interpret it as a reflection of expected downgrades in future search ad revenue, specifically in mobile browsing. If retention clauses are changed or if usage patterns shift even slightly, it opens the path for lowered growth estimates.

For those active in short-term volatility instruments or medium-term contracts tied to tech sectors, the compression across mega-cap names needs more attention. Spreads among the usual pairs could widen, particularly where AI deployment timelines now appear out of sync. The sharper the divergence, the more asymmetric some of these positions may become.

Movement like this—an initial drop, then a rapid sector recalibration—also signals how concentrated search-related revenue is within just a handful of companies. The market’s reaction here reminds us of how pricing can front-run deployment announcements, particularly when AI is seen as a disrupter to long-standing fee arrangements.

The next round of market reports may reflect these concerns more clearly. If newer entrants succeed in retaining users within their own search ecosystems, previously reliable revenue-sharing streams will become less stable. That’s already being priced in.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The US Dollar Index remains stable after reaching a five-day low around 99.20. The Index, tracking the USD against six major currencies, currently sits around 99.40, close to the previous low.

Geopolitical developments could impact the Index, with China and US trade talks in Switzerland and tensions between Pakistan and India. Economic aspects include the Federal Reserve rate decision, expected to maintain rates at 4.25%-4.50% despite calls for a cut.

Impact of Federal Reserve’s Rate Decision

If the Federal Reserve holds rates steady, markets expect the odds of a June rate cut at 28.3% and a 74.2% likelihood of lower rates by July’s end. Traders are also monitoring statements from the Fed Chairman following the rate decision.

In light of these factors, the US Dollar Index could see resistance near 100.22, with potential support levels at 97.73, 96.94, 95.25, and 94.56. Central banks aim to maintain price stability, typically keeping inflation near 2% through policy rate adjustments.

Monetary policy is often managed through interest rate changes, with ‘doves’ favouring lower rates for economic growth and ‘hawks’ preferring marginally higher rates to curb inflation. The interplay between these roles can influence decisions and ultimately financial markets.

As of now, the US Dollar Index (DXY) is hovering just above its recent five-day trough, suggesting some tentative balance in sentiment after brief downside pressure. That drop to around 99.20 earlier in the week did catch attention, but price action has since steadied near the 99.40 level. This implies that traders are not yet prepared to defend a breakout in either direction, keeping volatility range-bound for the moment.

Global Influences on Currency Sentiment

Behind the numbers, broader forces are simmering. With diplomatic discussions taking place between China and the United States in Switzerland, any hints or missteps could feed directly into currency sentiment. Similarly, increased tension between Pakistan and India has the potential to reverberate across risk assets, particularly if it escalates. In terms of trading response, these geopolitics-related risks feed into safe-haven demand, which can either lift or suppress the greenback’s strength, depending on scale and context.

All eyes, however, are on central bank policy, particularly from the Federal Reserve. The recent decision to hold rates steady in the 4.25%-4.50% zone was largely in line with forecasts. Markets had already priced in a high likelihood of a pause, but the narrow focus now lies not so much on the current rate level, but on what follows. Probabilities currently reflect a 28.3% expectation of a move lower by June, rising substantially to 74.2% by the close of July. These are not small odds, and traders should plan accordingly: short-term interest rate futures and dollar-based hedges may begin to factor in the shift well ahead of any confirmation from the Federal Open Market Committee.

Powell’s remarks after the meeting are arguably more influential than the decision itself. In fact, minor wording changes or tone fluctuations in his delivery often give enough justification for fairly large market moves. Every adjective that suggests patience or caution might be read as a signal that the committee is preparing to pivot. As such, we’ll be looking closely at how future inflation trends are described, and whether employment metrics are still holding the Fed’s attention firmly.

From a structural perspective, we’re watching the dollar’s resistance point near 100.22. That level held during previous attempts to break higher and still appears to dissuade buyers. It wouldn’t take much to retest it, but any climb likely depends on upbeat data or a cooling in global risk appetite. On the flip side, the downside is layered with support — initially at 97.73, then progressively lower by stages at 96.94, 95.25, and 94.56. Those marks typically gain relevance if broader sentiment turns risk-on or if inflation data starts fading more quickly than expected.

The overarching driver here remains inflation expectations. Central banks, the Fed included, absorb a constantly shifting cycle of growth projections, consumer price levels, and employment trends. While keeping inflation near 2% is the goal on paper, what matters more for traders is the path taken to get there, and how long it takes.

There are broad characterisations of the policy stance taken, commonly filtered into “hawkish” or “dovish” leanings. Hawks tend to be more focused on long-term price stability and pushing back against overheating, while doves place greater weight on underemployment or weak consumption. These views feed directly into committee voting patterns and, more pressingly for the market, into forward guidance.

Our approach in the coming weeks will factor all of this, particularly as March and April’s inflation prints emerge and new employment data comes in. With that in mind, each policy speech, press release, or economic report is likely to act as a tradeable event, especially in options and short-dated volatility products. Positioning too aggressively in advance of confirmation carries obvious risk, but staying flat leaves opportunity on the table. Balance is key — and understanding when conviction becomes consensus is central to timing these moves efficiently.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Crude oil stocks decreased by 2.032 million barrels, differing from the expected decrease of 0.833 million. The private API data showed a larger reduction of 4.49 million barrels.

Gasoline stocks showed an increase of 0.188 million barrels, contrary to the expected reduction of 1.600 million barrels. Distillates saw a reduction of 1.107 million barrels, slightly less than the projected draw of 1.271 million.

Market Analysis

In the market, API crude oil is trading at $58.62, down by $0.46. It previously reached a high of $60.22 and a low of $58.59. The price is nearing the 100-hour moving average of $58.26. Earlier, it surpassed the 200-hour moving average, which is now at $59.70. Additionally, it moved beyond the 50% midpoint of the drop from the 23 April high, positioned at $60.08. Momentum at the midpoint and the resistance level of $60 decreased quickly.

The release of the crude oil inventory figures shows a steeper drawdown than analysts had pencilled in. Instead of the 0.833 million barrel drop that many were anticipating, the official data came in at just over two million. Even that, however, is still far below what the API had reported the day before, with their figures showing a draw of more than twice that amount. Immediately, that suggests that the market was bracing for a tighter supply scenario than what eventually made its way into the official report.

At the same time, petrol inventories recorded a small build—not only did that defy the anticipated removal from storage, but it also followed a prior week where usage had appeared to lift. That addition to supply, even if modest in volume, is informing current trader positioning where demand is concerned. The drop in distillate stocks was fairly in line but came in just below the forecast, offering slightly less support to bullish pressures from that category.

We’re seeing a very technical phase in price action. The contract is hovering just above key short-term levels, notably the 100-hour average, which lately has been drawing tighter as volatility drops from recent highs. Previously, it managed to surpass both the longer 200-hour average and the midpoint of the recent downside move that began in late April. That’s given way to weaker follow-through, particularly around the $60 threshold, where selling interest returned abruptly.

Trading Implications

In the short term, it would make sense to remain sensitive to any price rejections near recent resistance points, especially as upward movement loses steam around well-observed levels such as the prior Fibonacci midpoint. The softness appearing there reflects a fading momentum and diminishing willingness to buy strength.

Volume has also been thinning in those higher ranges, which tends to amplify reversals near resistance zones. Prices pausing so close to structural areas—like moving averages and retracement percentages—should never be taken as neutral; we should treat them as signals of hesitation. These hesitations often expose temporary imbalances between expectation and inventory reality, which tends to show up quickest in near-month futures.

Should we see prices slip back below the 100-hour average, one possible route is further probing downsides, especially if builds in petrol continue or if upcoming data illustrate softening consumption patterns. Any recovery rally will need to do more than test $60 now—it has to close above it and carry volume, or the move risks another stall.

The API versus official report discrepancy remains a short-term variable, but not one to anchor bias onto. Disparities like this tend to correct within days, either by confirming tighter draws in subsequent releases or being muddied by revised data flows. For us, what’s more telling is where the market starts selling, and how quickly it does so. That’s been at levels just north of $60—and that’s not gone unnoticed.

As we watch how storage levels develop, particularly for refined products, energy contracts may begin to lean further into changes in regional balances and refinery metrics. The sharp ice between realised data and priced assumptions usually doesn’t last long. The adjustments that follow often bring about productive opportunities for those prepared to react based on price, not predisposition.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The EUR/USD pair is consolidating near 1.1360, poised at a critical point within a symmetrical triangle. Current price action is close to potentially breaching the triangle’s pattern, marking an important juncture for the currency pair’s trend direction.

European data shows a mixed economic landscape, with Germany’s factory orders increasing by 3.6% in March, surpassing the projected 1.3%. Despite this positive note from Germany and a favourable current account from France, weak retail sales in Italy and the Eurozone have constrained the Euro’s momentum.

Federal Reserve Decision Anticipation

In the US, attention is fixed on the upcoming Federal Reserve decision. While no change in policy is expected, the tone of Fed Chair Powell’s statement could influence US Dollar movements, affecting EUR/USD’s immediate course.

The EUR/USD is currently trading just below its 20-day Simple Moving Average. The Relative Strength Index suggests neutral momentum, with a breakout above 1.1400 indicating a potential rise, and a drop below 1.1240 suggesting a possible decline.

Monitoring the 1.1400-1.1240 range is key as Fed Chair Powell’s remarks could drive increased market volatility. Price movements in this range can offer clues to the EUR/USD’s next directional move.

Market Volatility and Triangle Formation

The EUR/USD pair, hovering near the apex of its symmetrical triangle formation around 1.1360, suggests markets are gearing up for a directional shift. This pattern tends to compress until a breakout becomes more likely than not, and with volatility appearing somewhat muted for now, the likelihood of a sharper move coming soon increases. Movements above 1.1400 or below 1.1240 may indicate that the period of choppy consolidation has come to an end.

Germany’s factory figures, outpacing expectations, provided a brief tailwind. A 3.6% rise in orders hints at underlying industrial stability, though it stands in contrast to softer demand indicators emerging from Italy’s retail channels and broader Eurozone consumption. The mixed batch of numbers, while offering certain pockets of strength, does little to generate any consistent Euro buying pressure. The contrast between robust German orders and weak consumer activity elsewhere has left us short of conviction on the Euro’s near-term direction.

As Europe balances between economic bright spots and soft patches, focus shifts heavily toward the US. With the Federal Reserve’s upcoming meeting unlikely to announce new policy measures, the spotlight turns to Powell’s tone. Over recent months, markets have become increasingly sensitive to nuances in forward-looking language, and even subtle shifts in emphasis can push traders decisively into one trade or out of another. Powell’s remarks will be dissected not only for what is said but what is implied in the omissions or hesitations.

We are currently seeing levels below the 20-day SMA, which has flattened. This reflects indecision and a balance in buying and selling pressures. The RSI not diverging in any direction underscores the lack of strong conviction in this market, reinforcing that we remain stuck in a range with limited directional cues.

The 1.1400 and 1.1240 boundaries are now our guideposts. Moves beyond either range edge may not only mark a shift in daily bias but may trigger algorithmic or option-related flows, adding fuel to any breakout. That makes Powell’s messaging highly relevant—not as a trigger for actual policy shifts, but as a catalyst for market positioning and sentiment recalibration.

Momentum-based strategies should be held at the ready but remain on the sidelines for now. In these conditions, a reactive approach based on confirmed moves rather than anticipation provides more clarity. Watching the triangle’s support and resistance edges closely, particularly in conjunction with Powell’s speaking schedule, offers the cleanest view of what may drive positioning in the days ahead.

Volumes have remained stable, neither depressed nor exuberant, implying liquidity exists for directional positions should a breakout occur. However, patience remains a virtue in this context.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

USDCHF has been trading within a confined range for the past 11 days, with the upper limit set between 0.8265–0.8277. The momentum above the 100- and 200-hour moving averages has consistently diminished, showing a tendency for selling pressure.

Since mid-April, the market has formed a sideways range, with support holding firm between 0.8195 and 0.8212 during multiple tests. The ceiling during this period has been between 0.8318 and 0.8333, with brief surges above the moving averages showing limited strength.

Key Levels To Monitor

Key levels to monitor include resistance points at 0.8254, the 100 and 200-hour moving averages, and 0.8318 – 0.8333 at the high end of the trading range. Support can be seen between 0.8195–0.8212 over the last 11 days and further below at 0.8097 – 0.8128, near the 2025 low of 0.8039.

To reverse current trends, USDCHF requires a sustained breach above the recent ceiling and moving averages. Until such a move occurs, sellers maintain the upper hand, and the risk of downward movement into the lower support zones remains prevalent.

What we’ve been seeing with USDCHF over the last fortnight is a market that’s hesitating rather than committing to a direction. After mid-April’s sideways motion started to stabilise, the pair has spent most of its time bouncing between clearly defined boundaries, without any sharp breach that could offer momentum traders a reason to act decisively.

Let’s talk about what’s actually happening here: upward moves do take place, but every time price nudges above the short-term averages, buyers fizzle out almost instantly. This repeated failure to accelerate when above those references is more than just hesitation—it’s a cue for us to read the order flow as one-sided. Those averages aren’t acting as springboards right now; they’re behaving more like loose ceilings—flexing, but not breaking.

Market Resistance And Support

The top of this range, the 0.8318 to 0.8333 region, isn’t just where resistance kicks in. It’s become the market’s way of saying “enough”. Rejections have been swift, always followed by a retreat back into the range, often with increased volume on the way down.

Meanwhile, the floor at 0.8195 to 0.8212 has done an admirable job of holding back sellers. Stability at that zone ought to reflect stronger buying interest. Yet the longer we loiter just above it without making any real recovery attempts, the less reliable it becomes in deterring future breaches.

Now, for those operating in price-sensitive instruments, the priority is not predicting a breakout but dealing with what the data implies. Until we see a proper and prolonged push above both the 100- and 200-hour barriers—preferably closing beyond the top of the range with volume—we treat bounces as opportunities for short entries, not long positioning.

Looking elsewhere, that lower cushion between 0.8097 and 0.8128 now deserves increased attention. Not because it’s stronger—it isn’t—but because if price stumbles below the short-term floor, that zone will be the obvious magnet. It’s also uncomfortably close to the early-year trough at 0.8039, a level that once triggered disorderly moves.

It’s worth pointing out that we haven’t seen real conviction in either direction. But the weight of evidence—fading pushes higher, frequent tests of the base, and a lack of impulsive buying—leans towards bear control. Until new information forces a re-evaluation, we manage risk with the assumption that strength will be sold, and weakness could gather speed once the nearest supports give way.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Two decades ago, a technical analysis principle suggested that accumulation periods lead to uptrends, while distribution periods precede downtrends. This principle indicates that the size of these periods often relates to the subsequent market movements, illustrating connections between trends.

The VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has been forming a base for twelve years, needing recovery after declining from 2011 highs. A realistic price target, based on Fibonacci extensions, sets the first objective just below $91, pending a breakout above $66 on monthly closures.

The Travelers Companies and Fibonacci Levels

The Travelers Companies (TRV) adheres to Fibonacci levels from the 2008 market shifts. A significant move occurred when TRV bottomed in March 2020 near a Fibonacci extension, leading to a strong uptrend. TRV experienced resistance around $155, which later turned into robust support, indicating an ongoing rise with a long-term target around $358.

The iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) had a trend reversal after an uptrend from March 2020 to October 2024. During this rise, two trendlines provided support, but a 2024 RSI bearish divergence suggested waning momentum. By early 2025, a break below these trendlines confirmed a market structure shift, now consolidating near $88.80, indicating possible further declines.

This article touches on foundational technical analysis—accumulation leading to growth phases and distribution preceding falling prices. Essentially, when a market or asset quietly builds strength over time—without rapid price changes—it’s often preparing for an upward move. And when it sees wide interest or is heavily sold off, it may be near a peak or preparing for decline. These phases are not arbitrary; their depth and duration tend to reflect the strength and length of the moves that follow.

Chart Patterns and Market Signals

The chart pattern forming in GDXJ is lengthy—twelve years of basing behaviour. That’s not minor. A base of this duration, if resolved to the upside, often leads to extended directional moves. The ETF saw a broad decline from the 2011 highs, gradually moving sideways instead of rebounding quickly, giving the impression of a long-term reset process. What matters most now is whether price can maintain a sustained break above the $66 level on monthly closes. That needs to be the benchmark. Only then could the $91 area, a Fibonacci-projected level, come into reach. Until then, any short-term increases lack proper conviction. We must also be mindful of false breakouts which commonly occur near structurally important thresholds.

As for TRV, the trajectory since the 2020 lows has been methodical. Pivoting near an extended Fibonacci level—calculated from movements that began around the 2008 downturn—the price found a floor and reversed with trend-following strength. Throughout its climb, resistance was met around $155. This level later flipped and started acting as support, which isn’t just encouraging—it’s quite instructional. That swap in function marks strong acceptance of higher valuation. With price now making calculated gains, the larger pattern implies a long climb toward the previously discussed Fibonacci projection at $358. That’s a long journey, but price structures remain intact. We’ve observed consistent re-tests and support at higher levels; unless those give way, trend followers can remain engaged with risk plans structured around past reaction zones.

Turning to ITB, there’s been a different kind of shift. The ETF’s rise from the pandemic low has run into structural changes. Specifically, while price advanced steadily over several years—respecting trendlines and maintaining momentum—it began to lose pace as 2024 ended. The RSI, which helps track participation and strength, failed to confirm new highs late in the move. That divergence was early notice that buying strength might be weakening. Soon after, price pierced key trendlines—a break that lacked ambiguity. That action often precedes correction or sideways phases. The current trading zone near $88.80 is not a random mark—that level corresponds with recent support and consolidation during Q1 2025. Current price compression implies indecision rather than reversal, but trendline breaks tend to have lingering effects. Here, we’d treat rallies toward old support zones as potential retests rather than calls for enthusiasm.

Now, when relating all three instruments, we notice a theme. Longer-term Fibonacci calculations and structural breaks are mapping price expectations with more precision than legacy fundamental models. And when we, as derivatives participants, account for that—rather than react emotionally to headlines—we manage both exposure and timing with improved edge. What becomes productive over the next few weeks is watching monthly and weekly closes. Are assets respecting levels drawn from previous multi-year pivots? Are structure changes being confirmed by volume or RSI behaviour? If not, caution is warranted. If so, leverage and expiry positioning can be adjusted to reflect the higher conviction signal.

Ultimately, the message is neither bullish nor bearish—it’s conditional. It depends entirely on whether long-term technical areas are confirmed or rejected. And we act based on what the market actually tells us each week.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.