US stock indices remained largely unchanged on Wednesday as Federal Reserve Chair Powell reiterated a “wait-and-see” approach during his press conference. Powell acknowledged positive economic aspects, such as the US labour market nearing full employment and mostly healthy inflation figures.

Despite these strengths, he emphasised the need for the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) to observe how the economy adjusts to the Trump administration’s tariff policy. The FOMC maintained the fed funds rate at 4.25% to 4.50%, marking the third consecutive pause.

Tariff Rate Considerations

Powell noted the frequent changes in tariff rates require the central bank to await policy consistency before implementing major changes. While he acknowledged rising risks of higher unemployment and inflation, he indicated these might not significantly impact economic data.

The NASDAQ fell 0.35% before the rate decision, but saw fluctuations following Powell’s comments and the Trump administration’s tariff considerations. The Dow Jones Industrial Average increased from a 0.3% to a 0.8% gain, while the S&P 500 experienced minor shifts between loss and gain. Powell reiterated the central bank’s readiness to observe developments.

Powell’s remarks, delivered in his usual measured tone, made it clear that policymakers are in no rush to commit to adjustments without clarity on external shocks — notably the unpredictable tariff measures that continue to materialise. His highlighting of these policy swings signals that monetary restraint remains the preferred stance, not because conditions demand it immediately, but because the uncertainties leave little confidence for firm decisions.

Labour strength was mentioned as a supporting pillar — and for good reason. Employment metrics, showing steady participation and minimal slack, suggest that demand-side weakness isn’t the immediate worry. Inflation, while not ideal, doesn’t appear to be running out of control either, at least not based on the standard indicators. From where we sit, that mix removes pressure on the central bank to deliver changes, whether up or down.

Fiscal Policy Transmission

What does require a sharper eye is the transmission of fiscal policy into consumption and inventory data. With tariffs being adjusted almost month to month, corporate managers are likely to pass uncertainty into cost structures. This doesn’t show up right away in consumer behaviour, but we already see parts of the equity market rotating in anticipation of possible margin pressure — particularly in manufacturing-heavy components and consumer goods with foreign input reliance.

Equity indices felt this edge. Although the NASDAQ recoiled before the Fed’s decision, the bounce post-remarks — albeit mild — tells us that traders are pricing in policy caution as a form of stability. Meanwhile, blue-chip stocks on the Dow responded well, perhaps buoyed by the view that industrials may see more support than squeeze if tariffs shift temporarily inwards. It’s also worth flagging that sector disparity continues to widen, with certain S&P 500 segments oscillating within tighter ranges than usual.

The third pause at the current funds rate presents a stable floor for those trading near-term interest rate futures. If policy rates move, they are unlikely to do so before signs emerge that the tariff burden is either stabilised or withdrawn. Until then, options activity should favour defined ranges, and strategies should lean toward betting against extreme moves unless prompted by fresh data. Knock-on effects from Powell’s mention of unemployment and inflation risks, although noted mildly, could gain weight if economic prints show any deviation from expectations in the coming two quarters.

We’re watching for volatility to remain compressed, absent a shock — external or domestic. But with trade policy and monetary trimming tied so closely, the rhythm of options contracts may start to dance to regulatory announcements as much as traditional market indicators. That’s where tactical flexibility becomes key. Calendar spreads may gain utility in an environment where timing policy reaction is less about quarter-to-quarter data and more about day-to-day tweets and ensuing market recalibrations.

The message for now: hold the lever steady, but be ready to shift gears quickly if external noise becomes internal motion.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Bank of Japan released minutes for its March meeting, where it opted to maintain its current monetary policy. Prior to the minutes, a ‘Summary of Opinions’ was published.

Key points from the Summary noted that rate hikes would continue if the economy and prices align with forecasts. There are increasing risks from the U.S. that could negatively affect Japan’s economy.

Potential Challenges and Steady Policy Approach

The Summary also mentioned potential challenges from U.S. tariff policies and supply chain disruptions, leading to a steady policy approach. This caution suggests the Bank may maintain its stance for several meetings.

In line with previous decisions, the Bank’s May 1 meeting similarly resulted in no changes to the policy. The decision reflects a consistent strategy in response to external economic pressures.

As we digest the content from the March minutes and the accompanying Summary of Opinions, it’s plain that monetary authorities are choosing steadiness in policy over pre-emptive tightening, especially given persistent uncertainty abroad. By holding rates while stating that hikes are conditional upon data aligning with forecasts, the Bank is leaving space to move later without stirring markets for now.

What is clear is that the risks arriving from across the Pacific are not being underestimated. Increased tariffs or prolonged supply disruptions could filter through to production figures and pricing. Given how tightly connected trade flows are and how fast sentiment can unwind, it’s unsurprising that policy has not shifted. Instead of leaning forward, the Bank appears to be waiting to see more consistent data that would justify action.

Evaluating Market and Policy Adjustments

With the May decision reinforcing this cautious tone, we must assume they are still searching for evidence of sustained domestic strength before adjusting rates. Inflation, while moving, remains tied to imported costs and is yet to show signs of being broadly demand-driven. Domestic consumption patterns, weak wage growth, and persistent capacity slack do not yet suggest overheating.

Kuroda’s successor and his colleagues, therefore, appear to be wary of acting too early. From our point of view in the derivatives space, this flags that directional bets on rate movement in the near term may not be rewarded unless unexpected data emerges. Pricing in yen rates might remain range-bound, and we would expect low implied volatilities to persist.

Ueda’s message is not hidden inside jargon – it’s measured restraint in the face of noisy signals. Traders should consider that the bar for rate adjustments remains relatively high, given the downside risk from overseas policy shocks and the fragility of domestic recovery.

The persistence of language noting supply chain fragility and references to trade frictions in American policy indicate these are not fleeting concerns. That makes any uplift in volatility grounded more in geopolitical events than local fundamentals. As such, strategy should shift away from near-term policy predictions and toward gauging sentiment around external data releases and geopolitical calendars.

With forward guidance effectively tied to conditions being met – rather than proactive shifts – positioning now requires patience. We have to think about term structure, rollover timing, and whether implied pricing genuinely captures the wait-and-see message. For now, it does. But if market pricing starts looking too far ahead, options selling may re-enter the picture.

In the weeks ahead, attention should lean more toward second-tier indicators – wages, spending data, and export volumes – which may tip the balance in risk premiums. But unless surprises emerge, it remains a waiting game for policy shifts. That, at least for now, presents a stable short-term environment to model around.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The US Federal Reserve decided to keep the policy rate unchanged at 4.25%-4.5% during its May meeting. Economic uncertainty has risen, with potential risks of higher unemployment and inflation noted.

The Fed maintains its current pace of reducing holdings of treasuries and mortgage-backed securities. Despite this decision, the US Dollar remained stable in response to the Fed’s announcement.

Economic Overview

In the economic backdrop, inflation runs slightly above the target, with the unemployment rate steady at a low level. The Fed emphasised the need for further data to determine future policy adjustments.

There is anticipation the Fed might leave rates unchanged for a third consecutive meeting. There is no expected rate cut in May, but a 30% probability for June is considered.

Monitoring developments closely, economic expansion continues at a solid pace amid trade-related challenges. Overall, the Fed remains cautious, opting to observe economic conditions before making further policy shifts.

Following the Federal Reserve’s decision to hold rates steady between 4.25% and 4.5%, the tone from policymakers continues to reflect caution rather than confidence. Powell and his colleagues appear reluctant to shift prematurely, gathering data before leaning in any direction. Inflation still sits uncomfortably above the Fed’s 2% goal, but without clear signals of it warming further, they seem content to watch, not act—for now.

Labour markets remain tight, with unemployment hovering at historically low levels. That said, sustained strength in hiring no longer seems as assured as it did late last year. If the jobs data turns, it may not take more than one weak print to shift expectations, especially when paired with stubborn inflation readings. We’ve seen broad resilience in consumption, but cracks are visible in the form of rising household debt and softer purchasing activity in key sectors.

Market Response

Markets have priced in little chance of a cut this month, and only about one-in-three are betting on one in June. This means the pricing curve is likely to stay shallow unless headline data breaks sharply in either direction. If inflation surprises on the upside, that curve could flatten further, particularly at the short end. Conversely, a weak jobs report could shift odds quickly, and traders might need to rework exposure accordingly.

For now, the Treasury market is showing composure, with longer yields hovering in relatively narrow ranges. Volatility, however, remains a persistent feature in short-term interest rate derivatives. Swaps and futures options are still pointing to uncertainty about Fed direction come late Q2, suggesting caution might be warranted around high-leverage calendar spreads or binary-type positions into the next jobs print and CPI release. These events have recently delivered more impact than the Fed meetings themselves.

Balance sheet reduction is continuing at the current pace, which removes some liquidity from the system. But it doesn’t seem to be raising market stress levels—at least not yet. That said, collateral positioning into quarter-end and any signs of constraint in repo markets should be watched. Funding pressures might creep up with little warning.

Given this posture by the Fed—remaining data dependent but noncommittal—momentum-based strategies may struggle. Instead, premium collection strategies or low-delta directional positioning may perform more favourably. This also implies that short-dated gamma could decay more quickly in sessions absent clear directional data catalysts.

We have seen the US Dollar hold its ground post-decision, which confirms how tightly anchored rate expectations are to current levels. For cross-asset strategies, that stability provides a reference point, but it also means opportunities may be fleeting. Timing around data becomes absolutely key.

Traders relying on options structures tied to volatility spikes should be alert to headline risk, especially given upcoming congressional testimony and potential geopolitical headlines. Looking ahead, adjustment windows may narrow, and positioning too early could cost. It may serve preference to stay light on directional risk until the Fed signals a forced hand.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US Treasury yields decreased after Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell suggested there is no rush to change current monetary policy. The US Dollar Index (DXY) slightly dipped to 99.51 from a high of 99.63 as the dollar is affected by falling yields.

The 10-year US Treasury yield dropped two and a half basis points to 4.271%, impacting the dollar’s strength. Powell emphasised that tariffs might impede the Fed’s objectives, leading to more uncertainty in policy direction.

Monetary Policy Meetings

The Federal Reserve’s primary role is to ensure price stability and full employment by adjusting interest rates. This impacts the US Dollar’s strength, affecting international capital flows based on economic conditions.

The Federal Reserve holds eight monetary policy meetings annually through the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), consisting of key Fed officials. Quantitative Easing (QE) and Quantitative Tightening (QT) are tools used in extreme economic situations, influencing the dollar’s value differently based on their implementation.

QE involves buying bonds to increase credit flow, often weakening the dollar, while QT stops bond buying, potentially strengthening it. These monetary strategies aim to address crises or stimulate economic activity when required.

With Powell now openly questioning the side effects of mounting tariffs, and acknowledging that these could easily work against the Fed’s dual mandate, the market’s attention has shifted. There’s a subtle but noticeable retreat from assumptions of aggressive policy moves in the near term. During his remarks, the clear message was that the Fed requires more clarity before tilting policy one way or the other. Importantly, that means yields may remain range-bound for now, unless a new catalyst emerges.

Economic Conditions and Risks

It’s not just about yields, though. The minor drop in the Dollar Index, inching down from its recent peak, shows how tightly linked bond moves are to demand for the dollar. As 10-year Treasury yields pull back slightly, shedding a couple of basis points to 4.271%, we’re seeing soft pressure on the greenback. That’s to be expected, given that lower returns abroad tend to make dollar-denominated assets less attractive.

Mention of Quantitative Easing and Tightening wasn’t idle. Calling attention to these tools—and not the immediate interest rate path—signals that broader instruments might come back into focus if economic conditions shift sharply. QE, for instance, reflects a willingness to push liquidity into markets. It inflates the Fed’s balance sheet and, historically, has tended to reduce the dollar’s desirability. QT, meanwhile, does the opposite. It’s a cooling act, pulling funds off the table, and that changes sentiment just as swiftly.

From our perspective, the key point here is this hesitation. Powell’s acknowledgment of tariffs as a potential obstacle, not just a trade tool, builds further questions into the narrative. Up to now, rate policy was mostly seen through a lens of domestic inflation and labour. What’s altered in the past few sessions is that international dynamics—namely trade tensions—have again stirred into view.

This may not lead to immediate repricing, but action in derivatives markets will depend heavily on how rate expectations respond. Short-dated volatility could pick up ahead of July’s Federal Open Market Committee gathering, particularly if more Fed speakers echo Powell’s line. Upcoming data, especially around core inflation and demand, could act as short-term stress points.

In terms of how we proceed, there’s a loud signal to moderate gearing based on directional rate assumptions alone. The dovish undertone from the Fed, when combined with softening yields and a cautious dollar, alters risk-reward on near-term rate and FX plays. It’s worth keeping exposure lighter while reading for clearer data confirmation. Any sudden recalibration in implied rates will find its way into volatility pricing almost immediately.

Also, with forward guidance appearing more restrained, strategies that previously benefitted from policy certainty may no longer offer the same edge. Instead of high-conviction directional plays, we might build more nuanced positioning options—perhaps butterflies or calendar structures—that can capitalise on the likelihood of consolidation. We focus less on timing peak rates and more on the path that gets us there.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The USDJPY experienced selling pressure, but support was found at the 100-bar moving average on the 4-hour chart, with the low reaching 142.89. This failure to drop further spurred buyers into action, pushing prices higher.

The price then ascended towards the 100-bar moving average at 143.953 on the 4-hour chart, surpassing the 200-hour moving average at 143.51 before reaching a high of 143.88. These price points paint a broader picture of market dynamics related to Federal Reserve considerations.

Federal Reserve Sentiments

The Federal Reserve Chair remains uncertain about future economic expectations, but there is a slight inclination towards a downside risk. The market movements in the USDJPY seem to reflect these broader economic sentiments.

This existing portion tells us that there was a moment where sellers had the upper hand with the USDJPY pair, but not for long. Once price action touched the 100-bar moving average on the 4-hour timeframe—specifically at 142.89—it rebounded. That level acted like a floor. Sellers either lost conviction or took profits, while buyers saw an opportunity and stepped in. The rebound wasn’t just a random move; it reestablished a short-term floor in alignment with a widely watched technical indicator.

As price continued upward momentum, it moved through several other moving averages—things many of us watch closely for confirmation. It pierced the 200-hour line at 143.51 with a degree of energy and reached 143.88, which is close to, but not quite touching, the 100-bar on the 4-hour chart at 143.953. When levels that previously acted as resistance begin to break or approach re-test, they often tell a story about sentiment becoming less defensive and more constructive, driven in part by expectations forming around central bank cues.

Powell’s remarks added texture to this backdrop. He didn’t give strong direction, but what did emerge was a tone that hinted at some vulnerability in the economic outlook. He acknowledged underlying softness without fully committing to a dovish path. From our perspective, that cautious tone interacts with yield movements, and by extension affects dollar strength. Treasury markets seem to be factoring in reduced forward guidance certainty, which translates into an environment where currency ranges can react more sharply to data than to speeches alone.

Strategic Market Considerations

In the coming days, it would be prudent to keep a close eye on the reaction around those key levels identified earlier. Repeated testing of the 143.95 zone without rejection would suggest the market isn’t as hesitant anymore. Should price hold above the 200-hour average and push above that marker, momentum could gather pace and targets could be adjusted upward, though not before seeing how upcoming data points align with what Powell hesitated to commit to.

Volume behaviour around these levels will matter next. If moves occur on thin trading, we treat that differently than if they’re supported by broad participation. During periods of policy ambiguity, shorter timeframes often help us to pick up on shifts in positioning that would otherwise only become apparent after the fact.

Looking back at 142.89, it now acts as a reference. Not just a number, but a test of will. Should anything send us there again, how the market behaves in that zone will carry more importance now that it has proven itself once already. Stops, if they exist for trend-followers, likely sit tight around there, and the absence of new lows adds comfort for those holding from below.

One thing we’re all working around is that economic tone isn’t easing into clarity yet. The chair isn’t committing because the numbers themselves haven’t provided enough evidence. While the dollar has moved accordingly, it isn’t moving with one-sided confidence, which means each retracement or attempted breakout fits more within technical cues. So, respecting recent support-resistance bands will help more than speculating on a policy pivot.

From a strategy viewpoint, we’re viewing price touches to the upside as chances to revisit shorter timeframe indicators in tandem with sessions out of Asia. Early signs of risk sentiment have been expressing themselves quicker across the yen in particular, which may allow for earlier positioning ahead of European flows.

Watching whether 143.51 becomes the staging ground for either consolidation or exhaustion will reveal if buyer conviction is broadening or fading. All of this, of course, before the next data release rewrites expectations—again. Until then, the levels speak clearer than the forecasts.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

GBP/USD experienced a decline following the Federal Reserve’s decision to maintain interest rates between 4.25%–4.50%. The currency pair stands at approximately 1.3331, falling over 0.20%.

The Fed voted unanimously on holding rates steady, acknowledging increased economic uncertainty. They pointed to both high inflation and unemployment risks. They maintain their commitment to reducing Treasury securities and agency debts.

Initial Reaction

The GBP/USD initially rose to 1.3341 but fell as the US Dollar gained strength post-Fed statement. It approaches a low near 1.3322, with potential further decline if Powell adopts a hawkish stance.

The Federal Reserve adjusts interest rates to achieve price stability and full employment. A rise in rates typically strengthens the US Dollar by making it more appealing for international funds. Conversely, rate cuts aim to encourage borrowing, weighing on the Dollar.

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) holds eight policy meetings annually to decide on monetary matters. During financial crises, the Fed may adopt Quantitative Easing to inject credit into the financial sector. Quantitative Tightening, the opposite, tends to bolster the US Dollar’s value.

Given the recent move from the Federal Reserve, there’s now a heavier lean toward policy conservatism. Rates have been kept where they are, near 4.25% to 4.50%, and the commentary provided by Powell and others suggests they’re not keen on letting up soon. The unanimous vote to pause was not a signal of dovishness—it reflected caution and persistence in the face of sticky inflation and uneven employment metrics.

Market Sentiment

After the initial tick upwards, GBP/USD reversed course rather sharply. The pair touched 1.3341 before heading lower, pressured by a USD rationale rooted in higher yields and firmer tone regarding balance sheet reduction. We now see it hanging around 1.3331. The descent makes sense. The Fed hasn’t just paused—it’s still reducing its pile of Treasury holdings and mortgage-backed securities, which dries up liquidity and supports the Dollar by tightening dollar supply even without rate changes.

In this mix, Powell’s remarks are key. Should future communication hint at discomfort with inflation data or express preference for pushing policy rates higher, GBP/USD will almost certainly feel more downside. The pair’s recent dip near 1.3322 shows where the pressure could intensify, especially if yields on longer-dated US debt continue their quiet creep upward.

We should pay close attention to the tone and language from Fed speakers over the next fortnight. While the benchmark rate remains unchanged, any affirmation that inflation remains too warm may further entrench market expectations of prolonged policy tightness. That tends to push demand toward the greenback, not away from it.

For those handling leveraged products with exposure to currency fluctuations, there are clear levels to monitor. If GBP/USD struggles to hold above the recent low, traders may rotate towards directional exposure on renewed Dollar strength. Conversely, any signs of deterioration in US macro indicators—particularly labour market prints or consumer sentiment—could quickly challenge that strength.

The Bank of England hasn’t yet moved in direct response, but oscillations in the spread between US and UK rates will drive speculative positioning. The Dollar currently holds the upper hand based on yield alone. If that story holds through the next FOMC statement, the pair may slip further—particularly in the absence of a strong message from Bailey’s institution.

In our view, the price movements stem directly from the widening rate differential narrative reinforced through policy inertia by the Fed. Positioning should be informed by this divergence. Should Powell shift even marginally toward stronger forward guidance in favour of stability over easing, there’s very little on the chart below 1.3300 offering much structural support.

Near-term, keep technical levels at front of mind, particularly intraday zones around 1.3320 and then 1.3285, as a break of those would push the focus back to medium support areas seen earlier in March’s action.

Timing exposures around key US data drops is essential. Watch for surprises in core inflation, non-farm payrolls, and consumer spending. Volatility around those events may provide selective entry points without having to chase immediate momentum.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Federal Reserve is facing uncertainty about future rate cuts and the impact of tariffs, with a cautious approach awaiting more data. They’ve refrained from making monetary policy projections, noting that it’s unclear what the appropriate response would be. There are cases where rate cuts might be needed this year, but also scenarios where they might not be. Despite calls for rate cuts, these do not influence their decisions, and the committee agrees on a “wait and see” approach.

Regarding tariffs, the Fed observes no substantial economic effects yet but acknowledges significant uncertainty surrounding them. Sustained tariff increases could result in higher inflation and lower employment. They see potential changes as trade talks begin but note no current evidence of economic slowdown in the data. Supply chain issues cannot be directly addressed by the Fed but may impact demand indirectly.

Inflation And Labor Market Conditions

Inflation is above target with expectations of upward pressure, and maintaining price stability remains key. The labour market and employment conditions require balancing dual mandate goals. Financial conditions are moderately restrictive, but the economy is resilient, in good shape, albeit with elevated uncertainty. Businesses and households express broad concerns, leading to some decision postponement.

As it stands, the Federal Reserve has opted for patience rather than action, keenly assessing whether further developments warrant a shift in interest rate policy. They’ve laid out that there’s little merit in speculating on policy moves too soon, especially when incoming data remains mixed and does not yet tip the balance decisively. It’s not that they’re ruling anything out—it’s that all possibilities remain on the table until the data says otherwise. The message is, essentially, hold steady and watch closely.

Trade policy, particularly the uncertain scope and duration of tariffs, adds a layer of complexity. While it’s true we haven’t yet seen measurable negative effects in growth figures or employment metrics, ongoing tension risks accumulating inflationary strain—especially in sectors directly exposed to global supply chains. Price pressures could build through import channels if tariffs hold or increase, even as demand responds more slowly. It’s not immediate, but we’ve seen before how these shifts can quietly set the tone for broader market moves.

We note that inflation has remained above the central bank’s preferred range. With indicators pointing toward potential stickiness in prices, policy direction becomes less forgiving. This places rate-cut expectations at odds with the inflation backdrop. If those expectations persist without supporting data, it only complicates messaging and widens the gap between market pricing and policy intention. What this suggests is that directionality in inflation matters as much now as any forward-looking economic projections.

Dual Mandate And Market Conditions

Powell and colleagues continue to reiterate that their dual mandate requires ongoing calibration—sustaining employment while ensuring prices remain predictable. That split focus is more pronounced when the financial system is neither especially loose nor overly tight. Lending conditions are not halting activity, but they’re not fuelling excess either. We sense a general hesitancy in credit-sensitive sectors, and the same applies across parts of the real economy where firms are increasingly cautious in planning.

On the ground, there’s been a noticeable pause in decision-making. Executives are reevaluating hiring plans, CapEx budgets are under review, and household spending categories once considered non-discretionary are facing renewed scrutiny. Consumer sentiment hasn’t collapsed, far from it, but it carries an undertone of restraint—and that restraint lingers longer when forward guidance from policymakers stays non-committal.

From where we stand, volatility may remain drawn-out, rather than sharp, because this is not a market redefining event driven by a single catalyst. It’s methodical. The path forward depends on piecing together incremental clues. If short-term market confidence gets ahead of these developments again, price discovery may hit patches of mispricing. These are moments where recalibration tends to happen not with drama, but with quiet adjustments stretched over several trading sessions.

Broadly speaking, we must continue to align positioning with signalling that remains ambivalent—for good reason. Watching incoming payroll data, core inflation prints, and consumer spending patterns isn’t about reacting to one-off numbers—it’s about evaluating whether a trend is taking hold. This is a time that rewards focus, not flare.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Middle East Developments

He discussed the ongoing situation in Gaza, predicting updates within 24 hours. Regarding India and Pakistan, Trump expressed a desire for peaceful resolutions and indicated willingness to assist.

Addressing the Middle East, he mentioned potential easing of chip regulations toward the Gulf. On the recent US-Houthi conflict, Trump claimed a positive outcome, though contradictory messages have emerged from Houthi leaders.

He also replied to questions about tariff exemptions and relations with China without clarity on future changes. Despite the broad scope of topics, Trump repeatedly confirmed there would be no reconsideration of the high tariffs imposed on Chinese goods.

The remarks given by Trump just ahead of the Federal Reserve’s statement weren’t random, even if the tone suggest otherwise. The timing matters. When a sitting president makes direct references to tariff policy – particularly so close to a monetary decision – markets take note, whether or not direct action is promised. What we’re seeing is an attempt to reinforce a hardened stance on cross-border trade, while still leaving some doors marginally ajar, especially regarding specific exemptions.

Market Implications

In context, the reiteration of the 145% tariffs can be interpreted as a message not only to Beijing but also to domestic manufacturers and importers. It suggests that concessions will not be arbitrarily handed out, despite mounting pressure from affected business sectors. For those tracking future positions, this kind of firmness tends to restrain expectations for easing on the policy front. It’s not only about China either—his mention of baby items was less about necessity and more about drawing a line. If something so politically low-risk isn’t even under review, it’s fair to assume higher-profile goods are even further off the exemption radar.

With that perspective, our expectation is that volatility around tariff-sensitive sectors could persist. Traders in equity derivatives – particularly those linked to consumer goods or semi-conductors – should note that no shift in imports from China should be priced in just yet.

Attention should also fall on his remarks tied to the Middle East. The suggestion of moderating chip regulations towards Gulf states might not change anything overnight, but it indirectly signals where diplomatic energies are being channelled. If we assume any relaxed controls are on the table, that could influence positioning in sectors tied to defence exports or technology licensing. The problem is that there’s no solid framework there yet – just a verbal cue – and usually words without executive action fade fast from market memory.

Moving toward India and Pakistan, there isn’t an immediate trade link to draw upon from his comments. Nevertheless, shifts in regional risk dynamics, especially if the US enters as more than just an observer, could affect energy prices or geopolitical risk premiums. This matters less for straightforward macro trades, and more for those holding exposure to rate-sensitive positions with oil correlations baked in.

The flippant prediction over Gaza updates “within 24 hours” should not be viewed as an intelligence-based assumption. Rather, it’s in keeping with how he’s historically attempted to shape narratives through time-constraints that rarely materialise. That said, anytime a US president speculates about force movement or regional decisions, it brings into play the defence-related names – not because deployment is likely, but because speculation triggers short-term momentum trades nonetheless. Anyone running options near expiry would be exceedingly cautious leaning too far into positioning without protection on either tail.

On the point of China relations broadly, there remains no invitation for speculation. Despite fielding repeated questions, he offered no new path nor extended ambiguity. That deliberate vagueness should be read for what it is: anchoring market expectations to the current policy posture. From a volatility standpoint, this lessens the probability of sudden shocks from the executive branch, even if external headlines could still surprise.

As for the response to the Houthi conflict, claiming a “positive outcome” does little to reset risk expectations in the Gulf. American tone may have softened in parts, but messaging from opposition factions doesn’t reflect the same optimism. This divergence only sustains uncertainty around shipping through key oil corridors – keeping options on energy and transport sectors in play for now, primarily directional ones with moderate delta.

When viewed as a whole, this wasn’t a pivot speech, nor was it a measured outline of upcoming executive decisions. It was, in effect, a reinforcement of constraint. There may be small, reactive moves on the margins, but participants should plan against the backdrop of policy stability, not change. Meaning, actionable trading direction may not emerge from new policy but instead through overreactions to old ones resurfacing. The most adaptable strategies in our set will be the ones that assume unpredictability not as a side-effect, but as the system itself.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Jerome Powell is scheduled to hold a press conference following the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) rate decision on May 7. He will commence with an opening statement and proceed to answer questions.

The FOMC statement did not concede any softening in the economy or job market. It acknowledged increased risks regarding its mandate. The statement also addressed the recent GDP report.

Federal Open Market Committee Outlook

What the statement effectively communicated was a steady hand on the helm. Despite recent data indicating slower growth—particularly the latest GDP figures pointing to tempered expansion—the Federal Open Market Committee saw no pressing need to modify its stance. It wasn’t an omission but rather a deliberate reaffirmation that, from where they observe, the economy isn’t cooling in a way that yet warrants action.

By saying that risks to its goals have increased, the Committee is assessing inflation’s persistence more tightly than before. This isn’t a reversal of policy bias, but it draws focus to the discomfort around price pressures that still hover above the target. The reference to the GDP data, which reflected subdued consumer spending and lower inventory accumulation, hints that certain growth engines aren’t exactly sputtering, but they’re not propelling at full speed either.

From our standpoint, this points to a refined edge in policymaker sensitivity. Not panic, but watchfulness. During the upcoming press conference, Powell’s diction and pacing—especially in the unscripted responses—can offer notable cues. Questions around inflation stickiness, policy lags, and employment resilience might invite implicit forward guidance, even if not formally stated.

Impact on Market Strategies

For those engaged in volatility, we see a higher chance that markets start re-pricing timing assumptions about rate movement. Elevated short-term implied volatilities already suggest that traders expect Powell’s remarks to carry weight. If he reaffirms patience in response to persistent pricing pressures, we may observe a retracement in near-term rate cut expectations. Conversely, any hint—however veiled—of concern over stagnating growth could swing sentiment back toward easing bias.

Positioning strategies into the week should recognise the asymmetric path risk stemming from Powell’s tone. Historically, he has shown a willingness to accept a slower growth tempo if inflation is viewed as stubborn. Hence, going into the press conference, hedges tied to terminal rate recalibration may find better protection skewed toward hawkish pricing. That’s not a bias declaration, it’s what can be inferred from balance of communication risks.

Markets will also digest his interpretation of resilience in the labour market. If Powell maintains a view that it remains solid, despite less robust non-farm additions and flattening wage momentum, the Committee is unlikely to feel pressure to shift policy settings imminently. This alone would keep gamma premium elevated post-event.

Short-dated options are already rich, but we would highlight the potential for realised-to-implied dislocations if Powell offers more nuanced or balanced commentary than some participants are bracing for. That could quickly compress vols if directional repricing doesn’t accompany it. Timing matters. Reactions often spike early in the press conference and mean-revert inside the session.

In short, Powell’s phrasing—especially around inflation’s pathway and overall policy bias—could set up a domino of rate repricing. Those participating actively in event-linked setups will need to manage exposure sharply into that first hour.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The United States Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) decided to maintain the federal funds rate at a range of 4.25%-4.50%. This decision aligns with expectations and reflects the continuation of a holding pattern by the FOMC.

Following this decision, Bitcoin registered a 2% gain, signalling a reaction to the Federal Reserve’s action to keep rates steady. The Federal Reserve Chair indicated a commitment to monitoring economic trends closely, stressing the ongoing uncertainty in forming future policy changes.

Currency Market Dynamics

In the currency market, AUD/USD stalled its previous retracement from a year-to-date peak, impacted by mixed fundamental cues including US-China trade war uncertainties. Similarly, USD/JPY stayed below the 144.00 mark after a recent rebound, influenced by subdued US dollar demand, despite the Fed’s hawkish stance.

The gold price saw renewed buying interest, reversing the previous day’s decline amid heightened economic uncertainty linked to trade policies. This highlights the persisting safe-haven demand for the precious metal despite the Fed’s stance on interest rates.

What we’re seeing here is a continuation of the Fed’s cautious approach, where no new action was taken on rates, letting the current range of 4.25%–4.50% stand. That said, even without a change, the decision reaffirms the current hesitancy to commit to tightening or easing further. Powell’s comments made it very clear: everything’s on the table, but nothing’s guaranteed. There remains a level of discomfort with the inflation outlook—steady now, but still lacking full confidence—so they’re waiting to see more conclusive movement before acting.

In the immediate hours after the announcement, Bitcoin reacted positively, climbing by 2%. This suggests that markets, particularly those in alternative assets, interpreted the Fed’s reluctance to move as release from short-term pressure. It wasn’t celebration, but it was certainly relief. When rate hikes are taken off the table temporarily, risk-on sentiment trickles back in.

Turning to the currency markets, the Australian dollar stumbled in its recent upward move. The loss of momentum is likely down to broader anxieties around geopolitical strains, especially between the United States and China. On top of that, there’s been a lack of decisive direction from recent data, which keeps both bulls and bears sitting on their hands. As a result, the Aussie has retraced slightly from recent highs, and traders are clearly reluctant to push the pair higher without clearer global cues.

Market Reactions and Future Outlook

In contrast, the Japanese yen continues to hover below 144.00 against the US dollar. Even though the Fed didn’t cut, the dollar didn’t attract much demand—probably a reflection of how expectations had already been priced in. The yen, having oscillated in a narrow band following its recent climb, is behaving like a typical cautious market would: firm but not forceful. With US Treasury yields cooling slightly and risk sentiment improving, demand for safe-haven currencies like the yen has steadied.

Gold has turned higher again after drifting the day before. What stands out is that even with steady policy from the Fed, traders are still showing appetite for safe assets. That likely points to unresolved unease about the broader economic picture. In particular, trade tensions continue to loom as a source of concern, and that uncertainty creates a backdrop where gold finds support. When policy outlooks are muddy and inflation isn’t fully tamed, the yellow metal becomes more appealing again, especially for hedging.

Those accessing the derivatives market in coming sessions will need to keep a closer eye on implied volatility. If trading volumes in futures or options remain strong despite the Fed’s static policy stance, it reinforces the idea that participants expect movement soon—just not necessarily from central banks directly. Price discovery may increasingly stem from geopolitical headlines or unexpected data releases. It would be prudent to watch open interest levels carefully, and monitor positioning shifts that may preempt short-term dislocations.

The bigger picture now seems to rely less on central bank direction and more on external shock potential. This changes how risk should be managed in the near term. Focus should move towards how correlations play out—especially between commodities and currencies—while spotting when liquidity thins out during low conviction periods.

We should see whether any shift occurs in forward guidance after the next round of macroeconomic releases. Until then, dealer positioning and volatility pricing will act as a bellwether for broader sentiment, especially across interest rate-sensitive instruments.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.