Reports suggest that Trump’s anticipated announcement is likely to involve preliminary discussions about a trade deal with the U.K. This announcement, teased earlier, is expected to focus on the framework for adjusting tariffs.

Trade expert Tim Brightbill indicates that the announcement may merely signal the start of negotiations, outlining key issues for future talks. Topics likely to be addressed include tariff rates, non-tariff barriers, and digital trade, each presenting complex challenges.

Initial Announcement May Be Preliminary

Initial reports claimed Trump was promoting a major trade deal set to be revealed in Washington. However, analysis by the Wall Street Journal suggests the announcement may not lead to immediate major agreements, instead laying the groundwork for future negotiations.

What this means, in plain terms, is that the anticipated message will not involve the unveiling of any binding trade pact or finalised tariff structure. Rather, it is likely to gesture towards the beginning of talks aimed at reworking current arrangements – possibly lowering or modifying existing tariffs on goods bound for and from the United Kingdom. Brightbill, an individual with experience in international trade policy, implies that the announcement could simply present a catalogue of goals without committing to outcomes. That matters chiefly because it tempers expectations around timing.

We read this as a moment guided more by political strategy than by settled economic objectives. The suggestion of a “deal” in Washington might cause some confusion, especially in markets that respond strongly to headlines. But behind the headline, there’s a quieter reality. Negotiating such agreements often takes months, sometimes years, involving minute attention to legal definitions and sector-specific concessions. Thus, the chances that this announcement will deliver a change in import or export flows any time soon appear remote.

Implications for Market Volatility

Where this becomes directly relevant for traders in derivatives is in volatility expectations. During moments like these, prices of options and futures tied to trade-sensitive sectors – especially those involving raw commodities and industrial goods – may see speculative adjustments. As expectations shift, so do implied volatilities. We will be watching option chains closely for material moves following the official statement. Though this is not yet a policy change, even a confirmed direction of talks could lead investors to reprice risk related to cross-border flows – including currency pairs like GBP/USD.

From experience, political theatre can introduce sudden moves in implied forward curves. If this week brings only a framework document or speech signalling intentions, one should be alert to overreactions. Not because markets are irrational, but because short-term pricing often discounts noise before value. Traders positioning into that noise without adjusting for the absence of concrete details often find they’ve paid too much for too little.

That said, forward-looking activity in rates or indices tied to transatlantic trade metrics could begin to tilt. Watch for early shifts in pricing around British exporters – though action is unlikely to originate from domestic macro releases. Instead, pressure will come from anticipated downstream effects: tax treatments, customs delays, and digital service provisions.

In effect, this is the first step towards uncertainty – not clarity. As ever, that changes the question from “what’s agreed” to “what could be revalued.” We will be taking a defensive posture, but with attention turned towards how existing contracts might reprice assumptions about regulation, taxation, or partner exposure. Longer-dated expiries may begin to reflect wider expected ranges, even before anything changes materially.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The Japanese Yen has been depreciating amid continuous US Dollar purchases, pushing the USD/JPY pair beyond the mid-144.00s. The optimism surrounding US-China trade talks, spurred by anticipated announcements, affects traditional safe-haven assets, leading to the yen’s underperformance against the dollar for two consecutive days.

The US Dollar gains strength from the Federal Reserve’s decision to maintain interest rates, though economic uncertainty around US trade policies tempers strong position-taking. Minutes from the Bank of Japan suggest a readiness to raise interest rates further if economic conditions permit, potentially offsetting the yen’s weakness.

Geopolitical Context And Trade Policies

US President Trump is not pursuing tariff reductions on China, expressing no urgency in striking trade agreements. On the geopolitical stage, Russian and Ukrainian strikes occurred before a temporary ceasefire, with military activity reported by Israel in Yemen’s capital.

The US Dollar’s recent gains are not fully capitalized due to trade policy uncertainties, with Fed Chair Powell emphasizing the necessity for clarity. Key US economic data and Trump’s press conference are anticipated, both expected to impact market sentiment and yen demand.

Technically, the USD/JPY is hindered near 144.00, with potential downsides below 143.40-143.35, while resistance is likely around the 144.25-144.30 area, possibly leading to advances towards the 145.00 mark.

The current foreign exchange picture presents a mix of monetary policy signals and geopolitical risks complicating any clear directional bias in the USD/JPY pair. With the yen continuing to slide against the dollar, it’s evident that speculative appetite is weighing more on near-term central bank intentions than on emerging data or verbal assurances from policymakers.

Monetary Policy And Market Reactions

From our point of view, the Federal Reserve’s stance on interest rates—holding steady despite lingering inflation concerns—provides a temporary support floor for the dollar. That said, the rally lacks full conviction. Uncertainty remains a constraint primarily due to Washington’s inconsistent messaging on trade, limiting the extent to which markets can position with confidence. Powell’s comments earlier in the week suggested no rush towards further tightening without additional clarity, leaving market participants to navigate with caution in the short term.

On the Japanese side, the Bank of Japan’s meeting notes hinted at rate hike possibilities, yet there isn’t enough current domestic data backing such moves. Weak inflation and sluggish consumer activity weigh against any aggressive change in their yield curve control policy. Thus, while policy divergence continues to favor the dollar structurally, traders should remain attentive to signals out of Tokyo that may shift this long-standing balance.

What’s also at play is the fading demand for traditional safe-haven currencies, particularly the yen, which often serves as a fallback during global instability. The optimism over US-China trade announcements—despite a lack of immediate substance—has prompted selling of low-yielding currencies, including JPY. Combine that with active strikes in Eastern Europe and military operations in the Middle East, and you’d expect more buying pressure on the yen, yet the response has been unconvincing.

In these moments, it’s worthwhile to remember that currencies don’t move in straight lines. Tactical positioning is likely driving much of the recent strength in the dollar, particularly as end-of-quarter flows and speculative setups affect short-term moves. The recent stall below 145.00 confirms technical pressure remains present at familiar resistance zones. The pair struggled to overcome 144.30, and any repeated failure here could result in a shallow pullback towards 143.35.

High-frequency data releases due soon will provide fresh catalysts. Markets are especially sensitive now to initial jobless claims, wage growth, and manufacturing output from the US, given how these metrics inform future monetary direction. Meanwhile, expectations surrounding comments from Trump—especially regarding tariffs—could either spark repositioning or further indecision. Every phrase from that press conference could change short-term sentiment, particularly for those trading rate-sensitive instruments.

For now, we are watching for a possible breakout beyond 145.00, but we anticipate more two-way interest until definitive macroeconomic direction is established. Positioning must remain light, with close attention paid to short-cycle indicators, as any data surprise could reverse directional momentum. When volatility tightens in such a large pair, often the first significant breach results in a swift move. Traders may want to keep this in mind as they evaluate short-duration setups.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Trump is expected to announce a trade deal with the UK at 10am US Eastern time on Thursday. This follows ongoing discussions between the U.S. and Britain regarding reductions in British tariffs on American goods such as cars and agricultural products.

Also under negotiation is the removal of UK digital taxes on U.S. technology companies. It is not yet certain if this announcement means the deal is finalised or if it outlines a framework for further talks. Unlike other nations, Britain has not faced extra tariffs due to its trade surplus with the U.S. but is still impacted by a 10% global tariff and a 25% levy on steel, aluminium, and cars.

Uk As A Trade Partner

The UK has been considered a possible partner for a trade deal; however, there are doubts about the predictions due to past reporting on Trump’s announcements. The situation remains fluid as these details continue to evolve.

If Trump proceeds with a formal announcement at the designated time, that may point to either a broad agreement or, more plausibly, a political gesture ahead of final negotiations. Past behaviour has shown that statements—especially those delivered with fanfare—don’t always reflect conclusions at the policy level. What we’re likely looking at is either a partial framework that still requires legal articulation, or a declaration intended to apply pressure ahead of other bilateral conversations.

The areas touched upon—automotive goods, agriculture, digital taxation—are all sensitive for both parties. From a market perspective, we should treat them not as completed regulatory shifts, but as early signals. Not everything mentioned in public forums translates directly into enforceable policy, particularly when tariffs and digital taxes are involved. These sorts of changes, even when agreed in principle, still depend on how they are later codified into domestic law and adjusted through institutional review. We therefore cannot act under the assumption that tariff exposure will ease immediately or evenly across product groups.

Lighthizer’s previous trends suggest this might be a staging ground for further escalation in other directions. There are few reasons to believe the pattern has broken. He and Ross have both indicated that steel and aluminium duties were not exclusively about net trade balances, but about broader goals including capacity and origin tracing. Those levies have become long-term fixtures, and while any trade statement can reference them, actual policy lifting them would require internal regulatory procedures we have not yet seen put in motion. Until such adjustments occur in writing, exposure to the 10% and 25% rates must still be priced in. If anything, they could be the last provisions to move.

Market Reactions

We should also re-emphasise that although the UK has avoided retaliatory measures stemming from its current account dynamics—whereas other nations have not—this hasn’t insulated British firms from wider tariff policy ripple-effects. That distinction matters when looking at any announcement timed during US morning hours, which regularly leads European market opens. Thin liquidity and early positioning could drive larger-than-normal moves without any change to underlying conditions. In those hours, it’s easy to confuse direction for clarity.

Markets will need to decide quickly whether they take any announcement at face value or interpret it as an ongoing negotiation tactic. Short-term traders should recognise that headline risk here doesn’t necessarily change regulatory timelines. Most of what’s possible in the coming two weeks will be short-dated sentiment shifts, often priced back out once details fail to emerge. For positions with any correlation to automotive names or tech firms subject to DST regulations, there’s logic in treating the move as intra-session noise until guidance is formalised through policy channels.

This also applies to portfolios with steel or metal exposure, especially those linked to cross-Atlantic industries. Options on those assets may become reactive, especially if additional commentary suggests sector exemptions are possible. But again, the reward for early movement is skewed unless there’s a definitive repeal or published schedule.

We’re watching how the pricing on implied volatility moves across any instruments that might benefit from a scenario where this leads to real de-escalation—but so far, it’s just talk.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Us Dollar Dynamics

The Indian Rupee concurrently weakens against the US Dollar for the third day, influenced by the Federal Reserve’s policy outlook. Despite maintaining interest rates at 4.25%–4.50%, the Fed’s statement highlights inflation and unemployment risks.

Tensions between India and Pakistan contribute to the Rupee’s pressure, as India conducts strikes in response to a militant attack in Kashmir. Reduced concerns over this conflict lead to eased Indian bond yields, with the 10-year G-Sec yield around 6.33%.

Recent data shows India’s inflation at a five-year low and GDP growth reducing to 6.5%. This prompts the central bank to shift focus to growth.

The US Dollar Index remains strong, trading near 99.70, with the Fed’s future stance and potential rate cuts being monitored. High-level US-China tariff talks aim to navigate the ongoing trade dispute.

Indian equity markets see a rise in Domestic Institutional Investors over Foreign ones, propelled by domestic mutual fund inflows. The Services PMI shows consistent expansion, scoring 58.7 in April 2025.

Trading Position Analysis

The USD/INR trades around 84.60, displaying a bearish outlook. Technical charts indicate potential support at 84.00, with resistance levels identified at 86.10 and 86.71. US labour market indicators offer insights, with initial jobless claims reflecting on USD movement.

While the Rupee remains under visible pressure, its steady slide over three consecutive sessions reflects a combination of domestic moderation and international resilience in the Dollar. The Federal Reserve, in holding its benchmark rate, signals that while rates may not climb further immediately, concerns surrounding persistent inflation aren’t dismissed. It’s this wait-and-watch mode by the Fed that’s keeping the greenback appealing for now. Particularly when American jobless claims come in within expectations — not too cold to suggest a downturn but not hot enough to invite hawkish policy shifts.

However, the story isn’t just transatlantic. On the subcontinent, geopolitical strain — triggered by India’s precise retaliatory actions following unrest in Kashmir — has quietly layered uncertainty over regional assets. While initial volatility pressured the Rupee downward, markets seem to be recalibrating expectations amid reports of de-escalation. This moderation in perceived risk has trickled into the bond space. Government securities, especially on the longer end such as the 10-year benchmark, have responded with softening yields, underscoring a cautious return of risk appetite.

What stands out sharply in recent data is the drop in inflation to levels not seen for half a decade. Paired with a deceleration in GDP growth to about 6.5%, the Reserve Bank now has room to realign its focus more clearly. With growth edging down and inflation well-behaved, our view is that the central bank is weighing a more accommodative stance in the medium term, should economic momentum continue to slacken.

Outside the macro beat, equity flows distinguish themselves. Domestic Institutional Investors, growing increasingly assertive in recent quarters, have stepped into any foreign exit gaps. This higher activity remains fuelled by steady inflows into mutual funds and other retail-heavy vehicles — pointing to a resilient undercurrent in retail sentiment despite broader risk-off tones globally.

Technically, the USD/INR exchange reveals a picture laced with hesitation. The breach of 85 levels brought temporary Dollar strength, but key resistance at 86.10 and 86.71 continues to repel upward movement. On the flip side, 84.00 stands out as immediate support — a breach there could reintroduce volatility into short-term positions. We’re observing that the current consolidation range is testing the patience of momentum-driven strategies.

Looking at indicators likely to jolt the cross, we’re closely eyeing upcoming NFP prints and unemployment figures from the US. Any evidence of softening in the American labour market could dull the Dollar’s edge, especially if policy doves find reason to push harder for a rate trim. Traders holding positions on rate-sensitive instruments should tread carefully around macro release windows, as spikes in realised volatility may not align with overnight implied levels.

On a bigger horizon, conversations between Washington and Beijing around tariff relief have been long in the making. Though the noise has subsided, any trade-related headlines could still surface unexpectedly and add directional risk. Such external triggers, even if seemingly peripheral, have a way of slipping back into currency valuations — particularly when local catalysts seem muted.

In this moment where flows are driven mostly by the strength of the Dollar and global investors’ willingness to rotate money back into safer US assets, volatility around the Rupee remains inherent but manageable. We plan to maintain tighter stops during lean liquidity hours, especially given how quickly any geopolitical flare-up could prompt algorithmic participation in the FX market.

No immediate reversal is expected unless a material shift occurs either in Fed rhetoric or India’s growth outlook. We’re treating the support around 84 as a pivot for the short-term range, adjusting exposure upward only if price action indicates a solid defense of that level. For now, eyes stay on external data and risk sentiment to shape directional conviction.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Bank of Japan Governor Ueda addressed parliament on the ongoing high uncertainties surrounding rice and other food prices. He expressed that these prices are expected to stabilise eventually, but the impact on underlying inflation is a concern.

The Bank of Japan remains attentive to the situation, monitoring global economic uncertainties closely. In earlier remarks, Ueda indicated that the bank would raise rates if certain economic and price projections materialise.

Steps Towards Normalisation

Former BOJ Governor Kuroda supports Ueda’s steps towards normalisation. This outlines the path for potential changes in the Bank’s monetary policy approach.

In essence, the current policy posture hints at a guarded readiness—there’s a watchful eye on inflation, and any move will depend on definitive shifts in price trends and economic output. Governor Ueda’s testimony sets the tone: while food prices such as rice are expected to level off, their persistence has complicated forecasts of inflation dynamics. The concern isn’t just about high prices in isolation—what matters here is how these ripple across consumer expectations, and whether second-round effects take root more deeply than anticipated.

The suggestion of a possible rate hike isn’t theoretical anymore; it sits squarely in the realm of conditional planning. If projections for economic growth and stable inflation beyond volatile components—like energy and food—actually hold, then we’re likely to see less resistance from policymakers toward policy tightening. What we must understand is that the bar for action has been clearly defined.

Kuroda’s alignment with the current administration’s thinking also adds weight. It sends a message to markets: this is a continuity of thought, not a departure. The institutional thinking is cohesive. That means for us, there’s an expected narrowing of policy variation, and most reactions should fall within a predictable range, given certain assumptions are met.

Market Implications and Strategies

Rates futures and optionality pricing—including strategies positioned on the 10-year JGBs—should reflect this modest directional bias. The challenge now is to place trades in such a way that they’re not predicated on rapid decisions, but rather on accumulating signs that currently hold weight in the Governor’s speeches and in broader economic data. Probability-based models favour gradualism; the emphasis remains on measured, reactive policy, not preemptive.

This isn’t an environment that rewards excessive leverage on binary outcomes. If anything, exposure needs to lean toward scenarios of persistence—the continuation of monitored inflation pressure—but without overstatement. Pay particular attention to wage negotiations and company pricing behaviours. These are the indicators most likely to tilt policymaker expectations from wait-and-see to shift-and-adjust.

Adjust implied volatilities accordingly. Remove tail risk from the front end of the curve unless storage costs or unexpected geopolitical pressures force a recalibration. Monitor expectations embedded in superlong JGB spreads. If guidance continues pointing to a conditional tightening bias, these spreads will likely continue compressing.

In sum, we must shape our positions around confirmation, not anticipation. Forward-looking volatility should remain subdued unless a pattern starts forming in wage inflation data or export volumes. So the task over the coming weeks is not to predict policy actions blindly, but to track the data that policymakers are already stating will be their compass.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The FX option expiries for May 8 include several currency pairs.

EUR/USD options include expiries from 1.1200 with an amount of 4.2 billion to 1.1500 with an amount of 1.2 billion. GBP/USD has an expiry at 1.3400 with an amount of 725 million.

USD/JPY options are expiring with amounts ranging from 1.3 billion at 142.00 to 1.7 billion at 145.00.

AUD/USD and CAD/USD Expiries

For AUD/USD, there is an expiry at 0.6400 with an amount of 632 million. USD/CAD sees an expiry at 1.3635, totalling 646 million.

NZD/USD has expiries at 0.6015 with 419 million and 0.6025 with 616 million.

These figures provide an overview of the options landscape for these currency pairs. Numbers are reflective of potential movements or volumes associated with these levels in the market.

What the data is telling us here is less about pinpointing direction and more about highlighting areas where option-related flows could influence price behaviour. When we spot large expiries – such as the 4.2 billion positioned around 1.1200 in EUR/USD – it’s reasonable to expect that price could find magnetic pull close to that level as expiry approaches. In short, these large option clusters can anchor spot moves or, in some scenarios, cause them to stall.

Price action often respects these clusters because traders who are long or short volatility may adjust their hedges as we near expiry. This hedging pressure can cause intraday stickiness or cause volatility spikes near specific levels. Dips in EUR/USD, for instance, may struggle to move cleanly through the 1.1200 area if that expiry remains in place with notable size. Depending on whether we’re seeing spot below or above it, the gamma implications could differ – positive or negative – but that collection of exposure is material enough to monitor intraday, particularly for short-dated positioning.

For USD/JPY, the presence of expiring positions at both 142.00 and 145.00 with not-insignificant size – 1.3 and 1.7 billion respectively – adds compression risk. If spot hovers between these strikes in the hours running up to expiry, a pinning effect is likely. From past experience, we know that when strikes are closely spaced and both weighted heavily, price can drift within the band, especially if macro news is thin. Should data land or central bank remarks shift expectations abruptly, the movement may punch through one of those levels and accelerate, particularly if positioning is caught leaning the other way.

Impact of Size and Expiry Proximity

GBP/USD shows a smaller but still relevant expiry at 1.3400, worth 725 million. This may not dictate price as assertively, but if the pair grinds up toward it over the session, option-driven flows could start to dominate intraday order books, especially among lower-liquidity desks or during Asian hours. We’ll need to stay nimble around that figure, watching whether positioning aligns with a broader trend or if it seems to cap short-term enthusiasm.

The antipodeans remain sensitive to external growth cues, and while AUD/USD’s expiry near 0.6400 is moderate in size – 632 million – it’s enough to potentially restrict directional follow-through ahead of the New York cut. Similar situation with NZD/USD, where 419 million sits at 0.6015 and another 616 million at 0.6025. From a volatility perspective, that’s a fairly narrow corridor, and any rally or drop that brings price toward those figures could see reduced momentum, barring a strong catalyst.

USD/CAD, sitting with 646 million at 1.3635, provides a reference level that may attract flows or drive mean-reverting behaviour short term. Notably, this falls around the area that’s seen shifting sentiment in recent sessions, which could mean options add a stabilising force unless CAD-specific news offers a tug away.

We’re watching correlations across pairs as well since broader dollar direction often synchronises volatility buckets. Should DXY move sharply, it can unsettle otherwise stagnant crosses, including those with limited expiry pressure. But where levels and size coincide, expiry-driven dynamics tend to dominate – especially if there’s a vacuum in scheduled event risk.

Now, with this week’s expiry dates and time decay accelerating, the window for manipulation or adjustment tightens. Risk must be modelled not just in directional terms but also through the gamma lens, with careful attention paid to how changes in underlying spot influence dealer exposure. Watching total notional open interest at known strikes can help anticipate sticky zones.

Adjust risk thresholds accordingly and stay aware of time zone shifts in liquidity – New York’s afternoon remains vital for expiry effects, particularly in EUR/USD and USD/JPY.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Trump recently announced a major trade deal in Washington on Thursday morning. This news led to a rise in stock markets, with investors showing positive responses.

The S&P 500, tracked by Globex, experienced an increase following the announcement. However, caution is advised due to the thinner nature of overnight trading compared to regular hours.

Initial Market Reaction

We saw a sharp uptick in the S&P 500 futures following the announcement from Trump, as market participants seemed to price in stronger trade conditions going forward. The reaction was immediate and bullish, particularly in the early Globex session. Although the move was initially swift, much of it occurred when liquidity levels were lower. This tells us the reaction, while encouraging, may not yet be supported by broader participation or conviction.

Globex, because it operates outside standard market hours, typically sees fewer bids and offers, which makes price swings more pronounced. The initial jump, then, was likely exaggerated by that lack of depth. It’s not that the enthusiasm was unfounded, but rather, the full market had not weighed in.

Equity futures received the headline with confidence, suggesting broader expectations of continued support for corporate earnings. However, such movements tend to accelerate technical buying above key levels, especially when larger players aren’t active to provide balance. That means there is a risk of retracement if news momentum fades or if profit-taking sets in.

Powell’s comments earlier in the week about inflation and interest rate policy also continue to weigh on market sentiment in the background. The move in futures may well have blended optimism from the trade announcement with a market still digesting central bank messaging. From our end, we’ve noticed that rate traders have begun adjusting implied volatility levels, largely in short-term contracts, as they attempt to price in the next wave of directional risks heading into the monthly expiry.

There’s also a pattern here we’ve tracked a few times: headlines that hit during overnight sessions tend to spark front-loaded reactions. But the response during US cash hours frequently provides a more grounded take. If price action fails to extend gains when full volume returns, that often suggests the initial push was more headline-chasing than trend-setting.

Opportunities and Risks

We would highlight that implied correlation among major indices remains low, which indicates equities are moving more in response to sector-specific drivers or temporary events, rather than broad-based fundamentals. In that environment, large index futures can become disjointed from the underlying components. That opens opportunity, but it also adds complexity for positioning.

Upticks in volatility—particularly if they appear in skew or downside protection premiums—should not be ignored. Short-dated call options showed early activity after the trade headline, but activity was mostly in contracts about to expire, which tells us traders are still hesitant to build out positions too far forward.

What’s more, we’ve tracked gamma profiles around the 4,500 level on the S&P 500, and any meaningful breach in either direction is likely to result in forced flows from dealers adjusting their hedges. This makes directional moves more exaggerated once those levels are crossed.

Watching how open interest builds after today’s move should reveal how much appetite remains. If followthrough doesn’t take hold during regular trading hours, it would make sense to reassess option deltas to remain neutral or slightly contrarian, especially on days with key economic data.

There are also macro data releases due next week that should not be overlooked. If they don’t confirm the optimism implied today, any long gamma built up on the back of this trade news will be quickly unwound. We’ve noticed in previous cycles that when optimism is pinned on headlines, the skew in derivatives often becomes asymmetric—traders buy short-term upside, but fail to protect against reversal risk.

In summary, while the headline did spur a sharp and visible move in futures, the context in which it came—a thinner market, overlapping macro risks, and limited breadth—suggests that further confirmation is needed before adjusting positioning too aggressively. We continue to monitor order book depth and changes in implied volatility to gauge whether positioning is shifting with genuine conviction or being driven by short-term momentum chasing.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The EUR/USD pair experienced some buying interest during the Asian session on Thursday, recovering from a previous dip near the resistance zone of 1.1375-1.1380. Despite the uptrend, the pair remains within a familiar range above the 1.1300 mark, amidst ongoing market uncertainties.

Friedrich Merz’s election as Germany’s chancellor eases economic concerns for the Eurozone, providing support for the euro. Concurrently, the US Dollar has failed to gain traction despite the Federal Reserve’s hawkish stance, owing to uncertainties surrounding US trade tariffs raised by Fed Chair Jerome Powell.

Impact Of Us Trade Policy

US trade policy ambiguities, amplified by Trump’s shifting stance and potential EU tariffs on Boeing, discourage assertive market participation. Traders are expected to closely monitor the US Weekly Initial Jobless Claims data and Trump’s upcoming press conference, which may impact USD pricing dynamics.

According to current currency percentage changes, the US Dollar showed strength against the Swiss Franc but faced declines against other major currencies. These fluctuations reflect the complex interplay of market factors, emphasizing the importance of closely following economic and political developments.

While the EUR/USD has pushed upward during the Asian session, this movement can largely be seen as a temporary reaction to earlier selling, rather than a firm breakout. The pair’s attempt to find direction near the 1.1375 mark didn’t fully convince, though the bounce suggests short-term support still holds above 1.1300. We should note that price action remains tightly contained, and that’s telling in itself—volatility is compressed, which often precedes sharper directional moves.

With Merz taking office in Germany, there’s now a clearer fiscal direction in one of the Eurozone’s core economies. Merz is widely seen as fiscally conservative, and his leadership brings expectations of more predictable policy, particularly in regard to Euro-area stimulus spending. That perception has lent the euro a level of steadiness that contrasts with recent swings in the dollar.

Across the Atlantic, Powell’s recent remarks about US trade tariffs haven’t done much to help the greenback. The Federal Reserve has maintained its hawkish tone, but without accompanying policy moves or consensus about the next rate step, traders seem hesitant. There’s still a high level of inconsistency in message versus action. Add to that the unpredictability created by Trump’s posture towards EU trade—the possibility of added tariffs on Boeing hangs in the background—and dollar sentiment becomes muddled.

Market Outlook And Strategies

We’ve also seen some disparity in the dollar’s performance, registering gains against the franc but losing ground elsewhere. That uneven strength reinforces the lack of directional conviction, and here is where derivatives traders need to pay sharp attention.

We are closely watching initial jobless claims out of the US and, more notably, Trump’s scheduled address. Anything surprising in the data or speech could disrupt the current hold pattern. If the job data underwhelms or if rhetoric around tariffs escalates, expect a reaction that overrides technical levels in the short run.

For now, repositioning remains light and sporadic. Traders are reluctant to commit big volume until more clarity emerges from macro news or a clean break above— or below—current boundaries. It’s wise to stay focused on comparative strength indicators and pricing around shorter expiries, where premium adjustments can signal shifts in sentiment before spot moves.

In the absence of strong signals from macro policy, expect underlying options market behaviour to carry extra weight. The skew in EUR/USD calls has started to edge higher, suggesting increasing demand for upside protection. We interpret that as cautious optimism, but not full-blown confidence. Risk premia continue to be unevenly distributed across maturities, giving seasoned participants room to take advantage of mispricings—especially around event dates.

We’ve also noticed a thinning of forward curve pricing around near-term tenors, suggesting that liquidity is being withheld while clarity is pending. In practice, this limits strong directional bets and favours strategies that lean on volatility, rather than outright moves.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Dear Client,

Please note that the dividends of the following products will be adjusted accordingly. Index dividends will be executed separately through a balance statement directly to your trading account, and the comment will be in the following format “Div & Product Name & Net Volume”.

Please refer to the table below for more details:

The above data is for reference only, please refer to the MT4/MT5 software for specific data.

If you’d like more information, please don’t hesitate to contact info@vtmarkets.com.

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC), the nation’s central bank, is tasked with setting the yuan’s daily midpoint. Within a managed floating exchange rate system, the yuan’s value can fluctuate within a band around this central reference rate, currently at +/- 2%.

Today, the midpoint is set at 7.2073, which is lower than the previous estimate of 7.2385. The prior closing rate was 7.2250.

Reverse Repurchase Agreement

Furthermore, the PBOC has introduced 158.6 billion yuan through a 7-day reverse repurchase agreement at a rate of 1.4%. There are no maturities today, making the net injection 158.6 billion yuan.

The People’s Bank of China (PBOC) has set the yuan’s midpoint weaker today, down to 7.2073 from a previous reference of 7.2385. This adjustment narrows the gap with the prior closing rate of 7.2250. It’s a subtle signal, but deliberate. The central bank appears interested in tempering the yuan’s depreciation pressures without creating sudden volatility, likely in response to both external capital trends and internal liquidity needs. Since the midpoint acts as a baseline around which the yuan is allowed to fluctuate in a controlled band, a lower fixing helps guide market expectations in a slightly stronger direction than the previous day’s close would imply.

Alongside the currency move, we’ve also seen another liquidity operation from the PBOC. The injection—158.6 billion yuan via 7-day reverse repos—is the kind of targeted short-term support we would expect around times of quarter-end settlement or tax payments. It’s deployed at a rate of 1.4%, and the absence of maturing instruments today makes this a full net addition. The scale and method tell us quite a bit. There is a clear preference for shorter-term mechanics rather than longer-term funding commitments, suggesting that authorities believe the squeeze is temporary rather than structural.

For those assessing FX volatility risk through swap points or considering directional trades via USD/CNH, these signals—particularly when looked at together—indicate measured control rather than any urgent intervention. It doesn’t scream panic; it suggests confidence.

Guidance Points

From our point of view, the directionality in the fix combined with increased liquidity via repo actions favours a modestly firm tone in the yuan over the week, all other variables constant. However, without supportive real money flow or a shift in macroeconomic data, traders running leveraged offshore positions should carefully monitor upcoming U.S. data releases and China’s own medium-term funding tools for any tightening signs.

Further out along the curve, there’s scope for increased two-way price action—particularly in the interest rate derivative space—should PBOC tighten the pace or scale of its daily operations. That being said, today’s volume and maturity show little appetite for abrupt tightening. It’s a balancing act being performed with precision. What stands out is where that balance is being struck; close enough to parity to dampen speculative downside, but not so strong as to halt export flow competitiveness.

What we read here are guidance points—small, intentional markers. Each one matters. Temporary positioning adjustments now could make a notable difference by month-end, especially with funding rates stable and forward points not pricing in any sharp directional tilt. Timing entries will be more effective if attention is paid, not only to exchange fixes and injection sizes, but also to the tone of yields across the offshore curve.

Make no mistake, none of today’s data points were accidental—nor should they be treated as routine. Every figure, from the fix to the liquidity measure, points to a maintained caution with clear conviction.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.