In addition, Trump mentioned that tariffs on China could be lowered, with a friendly meeting anticipated this weekend. China tariffs currently cannot exceed 145%.

Trump expressed dissatisfaction with Federal Reserve Chair Powell, contrasting his stance with recent rate cuts by other central banks. He suggested that rate cuts would act as “jet fuel” for the economy.

Shift In Transatlantic Trade Relations

This new agreement marks a shift in transatlantic trade relations that we haven’t seen at this pace in some time. With streamlined access for US agricultural products such as beef and ethanol, combined with decreased non-tariff management hurdles, we should view this as a clear signal: tariff-related instruments are not just being used reactively, but proactively to sculpt strategic outcomes.

For those of us positioned in derivatives, particularly in commodity-linked instruments, the trade pipeline with the UK now reflects an environment with less resistance. Compression of customs friction may influence short- and medium-dated futures in US agricultural commodities. Volatility in beef-linked derivatives could tighten, but any moves in open interest around ethanol contracts should be examined for liquidity clusters that may form in the next few sessions.

There’s more: the inclusion of market access for US chemicals and machinery should not be overlooked. Those sectors typically carry tightly wound supply chains, and spread trades between industrial manufacturing indices and commodity-linked ETFs might see dislocation in pricing, but that mismatch won’t last long. Traders may want to map how basket weightings respond post-agreement.

Impact On Base Metals And Pharmaceutical Chain

The projected $6 billion in tariffs combined with $5 billion in export avenues isn’t just about top-level figures—it’s a redistribution of exposure. Aluminium and steel trading now has an internalised zone, which hints towards reduced external tariff shocks in these commodities. Watch for how base metals volatility, particularly in London-traded contracts, repositions. This trading corridor might suppress some of the directional risk, and metals derivatives, particularly calendar spreads, may flatten if arbitrage expectations subside.

Meanwhile, the pharmaceutical chain development between the two countries adds an extra layer. While this was not the dominant point, the supply assurance likely tempers pricing pressure in healthcare-linked options. Speculative positioning may rotate out of high-beta pharma plays into more cyclical corners.

Now to the Asia focus. Hopes of softened tariffs on China hinge on a potential diplomatic gesture this weekend. With existing tariffs capped but not guaranteed, delta rises in trade-sensitive tech equities should prompt recalibration in their options premiums. There’s room for gamma scalers here, but only with tight stopwidths. The forthcoming interactions carry weight; we’re staring at the potential revaluation of entire import cost curves.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The US Treasury has auctioned $25 billion of 30-year bonds at a high yield of 4.819%. The “when issued” level, or WI level, at the time of the auction was 4.812%.

The auction Tail was +0.7 basis points compared to a six-month average of -0.3 basis points. The bid-to-cover ratio was 2.31, falling short of the six-month average of 2.45.

Domestic And International Demand

Domestic demand showed an increase, with Directs at 27.21% against a six-month average of 22.3%. In contrast, international buying decreased, with Indirects accounting for 58.88%, below the six-month average of 63.9%. The auction received a grade of D+.

To summarise the opening data, the US Treasury issued $25 billion in long-dated debt—specifically 30-year bonds. The interest rate buyers demanded at auction was slightly higher than what the market had priced just before the issuance, which is reflected in the tail of 0.7 basis points. While not steep, this suggests bidders required a shade more yield than anticipated, hinting at less enthusiasm from buyers. Compared to the usual trends over the past half year, demand was weaker. The bid-to-cover ratio, a measure of demand relative to supply, fell below average. This indicates fewer aggressive bids per dollar offered.

Direct bidders—normally associated with US-based institutions and asset managers—took a larger share than usual, possibly stepping in due to lacklustre overseas interest. Foreign allocation dropped notably. This is often interpreted as lower participation from countries typically eager to hold long-dated Treasuries. The auction earned a low performance score, grading it D+, telling us that it underwhelmed relative to past sales.

Implications For The Future

Now, focusing on what unfolds from here, we believe attention must shift towards how this dip in demand, particularly overseas, might affect yield direction and volatility in longer maturities. With overseas buyers easing off, we could reasonably expect less support for Treasuries at current yield levels. That means volatility may persist at the long end, especially around announcements of future auctions or data that affects rate expectations.

As traders, we must consider this as a short-term pricing imbalance that may take several sessions to resolve. The weaker bid metrics suggest that long-end exposure comes with higher risk of drawdown unless secured at favourable levels. Positioning should be more selective until clearer signs of absorption appear.

Given domestic players widened their share, there’s some interest at these yields, but unless consistent flows continue in that vein, each new supply event risks repricing. Watch for follow-through either from pension funds or insurance flows, which might step in at attractive levels. Until then, carry strategies attached to the far end could underperform and require active hedging.

It’s also worth noting that while one soft auction isn’t necessarily predictive, three subpar results in a row can invite changes in expectations. An imbalance like this has a way of showing up in basis and curve behaviour, particularly in swap spreads or futures positioning. We’ve already started flagging subtle dislocations that suggest unwinding of duration-heavy portfolios.

Cross-asset relationships may be temporarily skewed as well—instances like these usually encourage traders to re-rate term premium assumptions. Broadly, the supply side has started to assert itself in weekly risk discussions, and we’ve noticed that positioning feels more cautious, particularly via put spreads and conditional curve steepeners.

In practical terms, that means margin allowances may need to shift, and forward roll assumptions should be rechecked. The long bond, after such a reception, is likely to trade with a heavier tone until conviction returns. It’s not a reversal signal yet, but it’s a discomfort signal, and that usually comes before clients reassess exposure.

From our side, we’ve adjusted expectations on implied vol, particularly in long-end tails, and are seeing more asymmetry in pricing. Until demand becomes deeper and more broad-based, premiums might remain dislocated, and strategies reliant on passive carry require extra scrutiny.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Trade Deal Announcement Impacts

US President Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer commended the mutually beneficial trade deal, enhancing market conditions. US unemployment claims dropped slightly, with 228,000 added, lower than expected but bolstering the Fed’s recent decision to maintain rates.

GBP/USD’s upward trend remains uncertain, facing lower highs and lows over recent sessions. If GBP/USD surpasses 1.3400, it may approach the YTD high of 1.3443 and possibly 1.3500, while a decrease below 1.3300 could lead to testing 1.3250, then 1.3200.

A heat map illustrates GBP’s performance against major currencies, with GBP strongest against the Canadian Dollar. Observers should conduct thorough research as markets contain risk and uncertainties, including potential total investment loss.

Following the Bank of England’s choice to reduce interest rates to 4.25%, the Pound edged higher against the dollar, rising to 1.3300—albeit modestly, reflecting a 0.15% increase. The vote behind the policy shift was fractured. Two members preferred to keep policy unchanged, while the remainder favoured varying sizes of cuts. This kind of division within the Monetary Policy Committee isn’t rare, but it tends to create noise around the market reaction, especially in interest-rate sensitive instruments.

Currency Futures and Projections

Currency markets were also buoyed by a bilateral trade agreement between the UK and US. Both leaders—from opposing sides of the Atlantic—praised the agreement, highlighting its targeted benefits for exporters and investors. Such announcements typically encourage optimism for cross-border capital flows, which in turn helps stabilise or even lift the value of sterling if the economic linkages are expected to increase productivity or demand.

Complicating matters further, the latest US weekly jobless claims revealed a figure of 228,000. This was lower than many projections anticipated, aligning quite well with the Federal Reserve’s recent stance to keep interest rates where they are. For those tracking currency futures, that data print might explain some of the reluctance in dollar selling despite a central bank pause. It’s a fine balance: robust US labour data can easily reinforce risk-off positioning, while soft UK monetary policy might weaken sterling down the road—unless offset by confidence-inducing factors like trade.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

EURUSD has dropped below the key floor support and the 38.2% retracement level. Current resistance levels are set at 1.1250, followed by 1.1265-1.1275. For sellers to gain more control, it is critical to remain below these levels.

The EURUSD also experienced a downside break as attention shifts towards the EU, potentially vulnerable to US policies. Technically, this break occurred below important support levels.

Risk Defining Zone Breached

The low prices from April 15 and May 1 at 1.1265 have been breached. Earlier, the 61.8% retracement from the 2020 high at 1.1271 and the swing high from 2023 at 1.2754 were surpassed, marking the 1.1265-1.1275 range as a risk-defining zone for those anticipating further declines.

Moreover, the broken 38.2% retracement of the upward trend from March 27 provides a closer risk level at 1.27505. Staying under this level allows sellers to push prices lower.

The subsequent key target is the 50% midpoint at 1.11509, which sellers aim to reach to regain control. Achieving this level reflects sellers’ ambition for continued downward momentum.

What we see here is a break in trend after an extended move higher, with prices sinking below formerly reliable support levels. The currency pair has dropped beneath both the 38.2% retracement and the prior swing levels with little resistance. These breaks tell us that some underlying confidence in support has weakened, perhaps due to broader macro developments that now favour downside pressure.

There is a particular urgency for sellers now to maintain control below 1.1275. That zone had functioned as a technical barrier in earlier phases—breaching that was one of the first signs of waning buyer commitment. We’ve crossed through it without much pause this time, and now that range serves the opposite purpose: not as a floor, but a ceiling.

Next Key Target

The spot level near 1.1150, representing a 50% pullback from the March advance, becomes the next focal area. Not just technically neat, but also psychologically clean—midpoints often are. If we can land below this mark, conviction for deeper follow-through increases. It clears the road for sellers to methodically test further zones of interest, particularly those that align with early-year range consolidations.

We also need to pay attention to how quickly price responds if challenged near prior resistance—especially above 1.1250. A sluggish reaction or hesitancy just under that zone would support continuation lower. Any sudden rallies back into the old support-converted-resistance zone of 1.1265-1.1275 would need watching, as that could either mark a false breakout or simply a short-term reset before sellers re-engage.

The technical evidence so far suggests momentum is now owned by sellers, but that strength lives only as long as price fails to reclaim those broken levels. We’ve found that short-lived rallies frequently offer opportunity, particularly when broader sentiment aligns. Timing remains delicate—swift bounces should not be dismissed, but only taken seriously if paired with sustained closes above prior resistance.

The drop below the retracement from March 27 has opened the door for further tactical downside. To us, this isn’t causing uncertainty, but defining a roadmap. Areas like 1.1150 are not hypothetical anymore—they are levels buyers must defend decisively or risk watching the pair drift toward older lows.

This kind of action has been consistent with market behaviour during uneven transatlantic policy narratives. Risk is easier to define now, and as long as we do not see a sustained close above the earlier support band turned resistance, downside conviction remains the more responsive posture. Buying here, in contrast, becomes a hope-driven trade without the protection of key technical floors.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

EUR/USD remains stable near the 1.1300 mark following slight losses after Thursday’s European session. Mixed short-term indicators contribute to a lack of clear momentum, with support levels just below and resistance slightly above the current range.

The pair maintains a neutral stance around this area, constrained within the day’s range as the market adopts a cautious approach, weighing the broader trend. Short-term signals are mixed despite the pair trading above essential long-term support, adding layers of uncertainty.

Technically, the pair shows neutral momentum overall; the RSI lies near 54, signalling no extreme conditions. Conversely, the MACD indicates a sell signal, suggesting possible short-term downward pressure, while the Stochastic RSI Fast and Commodity Channel Index remain neutral.

Long-term support is drawn from the bullishly sloped 100-day and 200-day SMAs well below current levels. Conversely, the 20-day SMA, positioned above the market, hints at near-term resistance, suggesting a limit to upward moves. The neutral Ichimoku Base Line mirrors the indecision in the pair’s technical outlook.

Support levels stand at 1.1280, 1.1213, and 1.1209. Resistance is located at 1.1312, 1.1321, and 1.1334, with a breach above resistance potentially indicating short-term recovery, while a fall below support might hint at more significant downward corrections ahead.

The EUR/USD pair continues to hover near 1.1300, having shed some ground during the late European trading hours on Thursday. The move was orderly, not driven by strong positioning or volume, and points to hesitance across the board. We’re seeing a somewhat indecisive tone fuelled by technical standoffs and economic event risk quietly looming in the background.

The current levels reflect a state where neither bulls nor bears hold a firm grip. While prices remain above foundational long-term support – defined by both the 100 and 200-day moving averages well below spot – the ceiling formed by recent daily resistance levels, along with the 20-day SMA, appears to be keeping gains limited for now. The daily Ichimoku Base Line – sitting roughly flat – reinforces the absence of strong directional bias. In short, there’s little appetite to push the price aggressively in either direction.

From a momentum standpoint, the RSI sits close to mid-range around 54, lacking any overbought or oversold pressures that might otherwise provoke a sharp reversal or breakout. Meanwhile, the MACD histogram has turned marginally negative, with its signal line suggesting that bearish traction, while soft, could persist if the market fails to find a new catalyst. Traders relying on shorter oscillators aren’t seeing much to act on either – both the Stochastic RSI Fast and the Commodity Channel Index reflect neutral levels, not currently pointing to upcoming volatility surges.

Now, there are clearly levels of interest to focus on. On the downside, 1.1280 marks the first step if sellers regain control, followed by 1.1213 and 1.1209 – a cluster of earlier lows that would be revisited only if downward pressure intensifies. It’s worth noting that any drop below this trio could trigger broader technical repositioning, with increased flows into protective strategies. On the opposite end, resistance comes in gradually at 1.1312, then 1.1321, and finally 1.1334. A move through those could open the path for limited upside exploration, though there is little on the technical sheet currently urging such behaviour.

Heading into the next few sessions, traders should be asking: are the consolidating price moves masking accumulating pressure or simply reflecting indecision? Positioning accordingly means remaining flexible. In our view, the mixed signals from momentum tools prompt caution with directional conviction. The playbook should accommodate both short-term retracements and failed breakouts.

Given the flatness of trend indicators and the restrictive daily range, short-term volatility plays or options-based strategies might provide greater movement scope than directional spot exposure. Monitoring intraday rejection levels and reaction to minor data cues will be necessary. Especially when the market ecosystem offers no strong narrative and price simply breathes between technical barriers, attention to execution timing and skewed positioning becomes more valuable than ever.

With no clear imbalance in buying or selling pressure, it’s no time to lean heavily in one direction. Instead, tactically rotating positions around clear intraday support and resistance, with an eye on external macro events, remains the more sustainable approach.

Bitcoin has surged by 4.7%, reaching $101K, a level not seen since February. Ethereum has also experienced a boost, climbing nearly 15%.

Positive sentiment from Trump’s trade announcement with the UK and potential favourable talks with China have encouraged market optimism. There is anticipation that more positive news will emerge over the weekend.

Bitcoin’s recent stability has laid the groundwork for its current uptrend. A past tweet stirred a brief rally for certain coins, leading to further discourse.

The tweet, which came from Trump promoting a “Crypto Strategic Reserve,” caused initial excitement but later frustration for him. It was discovered that a lobbyist connected to Ripple Labs influenced the tweet, causing Trump to feel manipulated.

He later expressed dissatisfaction with Brian Ballard, whose lobby shop was tied to the incident. This event provides insights into the inner workings and decision-making processes within the White House.

What we’re looking at here is a rapid market response to a blend of political gestures and technical indicators. The rise above $101K for Bitcoin is notable not just because it’s a high watermark not seen since February, but also because it wasn’t accompanied by aggressive volatility. This makes the current upward shift look more like a structured rally rather than a brief speculative burst.

Ethereum’s 15% rise is striking in its own right, especially considering it has trailed Bitcoin in momentum through much of the year. That it would outpace Bitcoin at this stage hints that cash is flowing into second-tier assets again, often a sign traders are growing confident. When we see such shifts in capital distribution — from dominant coins into those further down the line — it often reflects a belief that strong performance will broaden further out.

Now, cast your eyes to the source of this latest wave: trade-talk optimism and political theatre. A policy announcement involving the UK, coupled with speculation around diplomatic ease with China, moved sentiment in a clear direction. The primary takeaway isn’t what was said — which was vague in real substance — but how people felt about it. In markets driven by perception, feelings matter more than words.

Then came the tweet. The “Crypto Strategic Reserve” comment, while short-lived in its direct impact, might be best thought of as a spark to already dry tinder. It caused a reaction across several mid-level tokens, which jumped before quickly flattening when the back story began to emerge. The involvement of a lobbyist with connections to particular blockchain developers was interpreted as orchestrated rather than organic, and the attempt at influence irritated the originator.

Ballard’s name appears here not just because of his proximity to power, but because of how influence channels are now part of financial news. This isn’t merely gossip — it reflects how policy meets markets through personal networks, and how decisions can be steered without formal announcements. That’s a pattern we’ve seen more of recently, and we should be treating it as an input just like chart patterns or volume spikes.

For our purposes, then, the picture ahead becomes clearer. A fairly healthy base was established during the period of sideways trading earlier in the month, and this breakout occurred without over-leveraged conditions. As such, volatility hasn’t flared dramatically, and we haven’t yet seen historic levels of open interest or aggressive funding shifts.

Volume has ticked higher on perpetual contracts, showing that traders moved in rather than held back. But positions appear more balanced at the moment, rather than being skewed to one side. That balance gives breathing room for trends to develop further before we hit liquidation cascades — which, frankly, have been absent for most of the past week.

Those watching derivatives will want to take particular note of skew: recent options activity shows a narrowing of the risk premium on out-of-the-money calls. That’s a shift from the strong preference for downside protection that dominated earlier this quarter. It tells us that hedging behaviour has softened — not disappeared, but mellowed.

And then there’s timing. Weekends used to be unpredictable, but since last summer we’ve observed growing retail involvement during those sessions. Combine that with the belief that more news may break shortly, and you have conditions that could justify short-term positioning ahead of Saturday. But caution remains — especially if funding begins to swing too far in one direction.

As we saw with the tweet-induced jump earlier, catalysts arrive suddenly and sometimes with very little substance behind them. These short-lived jolts can be useful for swing entries, but not the basis for heavy allocation. Traders should be more attuned now to who says what, and when. Not because it’s always impactful, but because the reaction often is.

We monitor open interest to ensure leverage hasn’t shifted dangerously. We keep one eye on the breakouts, and another on the resistance levels reinforced back in January. And above all, we remain alert to when narratives shift — not only in content, but in tone. If the last few days have shown anything, it’s that tone travels fastest.

The United States EIA reported a natural gas storage increase of 104 billion cubic feet, exceeding the anticipated 101 billion. This data point is part of regular reports tracking energy reserves, which are critical for assessing supply conditions.

In foreign exchange, the AUD/USD pair experienced downward pressure, with prices testing the 0.6400 level. This was linked to the US Dollar’s strength and optimism surrounding trade situations. Meanwhile, EUR/USD moved to a four-week low around 1.1200 as the US Dollar rose amid US-China trade discussions.

Gold and Ethereum Market Movements

Gold prices also faced pressure, dropping near $3,300 per troy ounce due to the strong US Dollar and increasing Treasury yields, impacting demand for the metal. In contrast, Ethereum saw a 15% rise to reclaim $2,000, driven by positive sentiment from a US-UK trade agreement and reduced global trade tensions.

The Federal Open Market Committee maintained the federal funds rate between 4.25%-4.50%, continuing its current stance. For trading EUR/USD, a list highlights top brokers offering competitive conditions, catering to both novice and seasoned traders.

The 104 billion cubic feet build in natural gas storage, slightly higher than forecast, shows that inventories are being replenished at a quicker pace than many had positioned for. This oversupply, particularly at this time of year, gives utilities more flexibility going into shoulder season and can dampen any upward movement in futures pricing unless new weather-related demand emerges. For those leveraging contracts tied to heating fuels or LNG exposure, preserving margin at current levels is far less risky than attempting to pre-empt a seasonal pivot.

In currency markets, persistent resilience in the US Dollar added stress on higher-beta counterparts. The AUD/USD slipping towards 0.6400 reflects market readiness to buy greenbacks when appetite for risk diminishes or when trade-linked indicators begin to show fewer downside surprises. Given that the move converges with optimism around macro deals—and less about internal shifts in Australia—it suggests much of this descent arrived externally. We should be watching commodities closely to gauge whether this strength in the Dollar will remain sticky or if it begins to fade against a backdrop of actual trade volumes.

Implications of Federal Reserve’s Rate Decisions

Then there’s the EUR/USD pair, slipping back towards levels not seen in weeks. This action wasn’t just a reflection of strength in the Dollar but an acknowledgement that inflation readings in parts of Europe haven’t warranted any rethinking of the European Central Bank’s path. With the Federal Open Market Committee leaving the rates steady at 4.25%–4.50%, traders priced in fewer bets on divergence, but didn’t unwind Dollar longs. That adds to a positioning profile worth guarding against: short-term pullbacks in EUR/USD now need solid triggers to reverse.

As for gold, a weakening around the $3,300 per troy ounce region makes sense. While precious metals often serve as a haven, they compete poorly when safe US assets begin to yield more. Treasury yields creeping higher do alter the cost-benefit outlook, and gold gave way mostly without resistance. We wouldn’t be layering in long gold structures until there’s clear softness in either rate expectations or industrial data. The relative calm in geopolitical headlines stripped gold of safety bids, reducing upside appeal in the short term.

Meanwhile, Ethereum’s 15% bounce to above $2,000 stands out not only in terms of performance but also as a reaction unrelated to rate cycles. Traders increasing exposure here were likely emboldened by positive headlines, especially those concerning intercontinental trade cooperation. Tokens that are more influenced by sentiment and regulatory signals—than by traditional earnings or balance sheets—can move quickly when macro clouds lift. What matters now is follow-through. If flows remain consistent and tech-specific news confirms this upward break, there might be room to scale in further.

We had Powell and the Fed electing to keep things as they are on rates. Although no surprises came out of the decision itself, the real tell has been in forward guidance, which barely changed tone. That keeps US Dollar strength intact and biases on the side of caution for trend reversal trades. No fresh liquidity injections or new hikes leaves markets moving on positioning rather than policy. In fact, this quiet hold from the Fed has emboldened Dollar bulls to maintain exposure, and that’s unlikely to fade unless macro indicators in other major regions outperform in the next fortnight.

This type of backdrop—where rate settings are on hold, Dollar strength persists, and political tailwinds begin to support digital assets—will continue to drive sentiment. Structured options or directional spreads tied to FX pairs or commodities should be kept nimble, especially with few concrete catalysts on the immediate calendar. It would be wise to temper size until a firmer edge materialises.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

US stocks are rising on hopes of a trade deal between the US and the UK, with major indices increasing by over 1.4%. Current market data shows the Dow industrial average up by 576 points, the S&P index rising by 78.23 points, and the NASDAQ index climbing by 317 points.

All major indices closed higher yesterday, recovering from a two-day decline. The NASDAQ index is up 0.44% for the week, the S&P index is up by 0.42%, and the Dow industrial average leads with a 0.93% increase. The UK trade deal was relatively straightforward, but upcoming talks with China and others are more challenging.

China Tariffs Affect US Jobs

China’s current tariffs of 145% have halted shipments into US ports, affecting jobs at docks and with truck drivers. Any reduction in tariffs could bring substantial impact, with Trump claiming lower imports could represent a $1.1 billion benefit to the US.

In Europe, indices mostly show modest gains, with Germany’s DAX up by 1.08% and France’s CAC increasing by 0.89%. Spain’s Ibex posts a minor gain of 0.06%, while the UK’s FTSE 100 declines by 0.32%. Italy’s FTSE MIB shows a notable increase of 1.71%.

The article provides a brief yet direct update on equity markets, shaped largely by speculation surrounding future trade agreements. It makes reference to the recent uptick in American stock indices, most of which saw gains of over one percent. These movements coincided with broad optimism about a potential deal between Washington and London—momentum which had helped trim losses from earlier in the week.

From a week-on-week view, each of the main US indices is now holding modest gains, with the blue-chip average ahead of the group. That may reflect a preference for companies thought to benefit first from easing cross-border arrangements. While the agreement with the UK came without much difficulty, future discussions with Beijing appear far less straightforward. One reason is the very high import taxes currently in play, which have already barred some shipments altogether. US dock workers and freight companies are feeling the effect sharply. It’s not just a matter of volume—idle time carries its own cost structure.

Potential Benefits from Tariff Reductions

A suggested figure of $1.1 billion in benefits from reduced tariffs has been put forward. Whether or not that plays out in full, the size of potential changes cannot be ignored. Particularly given the role manufacturing and imported electronics play in current logistics and consumption cycles. If even part of that figure materialises in corporate earnings or payrolls, equity positions in export-weighted sectors could see rotation.

European indices, meanwhile, were mixed. German and French shares moved higher, though to a lesser extent, while some regional bourses saw less convincing movement. The UK market softened slightly—something we see as possibly tied to currency moves and underperformance by commodity-heavy issues. Milan’s strong showing stands out; it may point to renewed confidence in southern European financials or energy names.

From where we’re standing, overall market tone leans cautiously positive. That said, the path forward cannot rely strictly on sentiment—what matters now is how firm proposals take shape and whether tariff adjustments are actually made. Volatility markets, particularly in certain near-dated contracts, offer useful signals. Right now, prices still reflect elevated premiums, especially in sectors sensitive to international trade.

Please note the importance of strike selection and time-to-expiry when calibrating directional trades on indices. Certain spreads may now offer a better risk-reward profile, particularly given tail-event pricing earlier in the week. With the active backdrop and likelihood of news bursts tied to individual government releases, calibrating theta decay against gamma exposure may serve daily decision-making. Market-neutral strategies with slight directional bias, particularly favouring clarity over leverage, remain an option we continue to weigh.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

The AUD/USD pair remains steady around 0.6420, encountering indecision as the US Dollar struggles to sustain gains. US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has expressed concerns about rising inflation and unemployment risks, with no immediate plans for interest rate cuts.

The US Dollar Index briefly rose to 100.20, reflecting hesitation over US monetary policy. With the Fed maintaining interest rates between 4.25%-4.50%, the index has settled around 99.90.

Anticipated Us China Trade Meeting

An anticipated US-China trade meeting aims to ease tensions, not secure a deal. Any positive results may benefit both the US and Australian economies, as Australia is a key trading partner for China.

The US Dollar is the global reserve currency, participating in over 88% of foreign exchange turnover, averaging $6.6 trillion daily. Changes in its value are primarily influenced by the Federal Reserve’s monetary policy, especially interest rate adjustments and measures like quantitative easing.

Quantitative easing involves the Fed purchasing bonds to increase financial liquidity, often weakening the US Dollar. Conversely, quantitative tightening reverses this process, potentially strengthening the currency.

From what we’ve seen so far, with the AUD/USD pair lingering near the 0.6420 level, it’s clear that the market is entering a phase where sentiment feels neither fully bullish nor convincingly bearish. Price movement has flattened lately, with neither side showing dominance, largely due to mounting uncertainty about the direction of US monetary policy. Powell made it plain that inflation is clinging on harder than expected, while unemployment hints at worsening. That combination has dulled the appetite for any imminent loosening of financial conditions, especially in the form of a rate cut.

Market Sentiment And Policy Clarity

That hesitation was mirrored when the Dollar Index briefly tested 100.20 before slipping back under 100. The bounce was hardly forceful. It didn’t follow through, suggesting that market participants remain unconvinced about stronger USD upside in the short term. The Fed keeping its rates solidly in the 4.25%–4.50% range has contributed to the ping-ponging of expectations, but the market no longer reacts to firm policy stances in a linear fashion. Instead, it demands new data clarity before taking sides.

While some attention is shifting to upcoming US-China discussions, they appear more about restoring communication than anything groundbreaking. Still, there’s a wider knock-on effect for the Asia-Pacific region. If talks lower trade friction, even marginally, it tends to lift sentiment toward economies with heavy export ties to China. That includes Australia, whose currency is notoriously sensitive to Chinese economic pulses. A flinch in Chinese demand or supply constraints often ripples directly into AUD pricing.

It’s worth remembering that the USD’s dominant role in the global financial system—participating in almost nine out of every ten foreign exchange trades—means it doesn’t just reflect the US economy. It often reacts as a proxy for global risk appetite, liquidity demand, or adjustments in policy differentials between key central banks. The speed and scale at which the Fed shifts stance are usually the key triggers.

When the Fed enters a bond-buying cycle, injecting cash into the financial system—what we call quantitative easing—it’s common for the Dollar to lose value. That’s not a side effect; it’s baked into the mechanic. The inverse also holds true. Tightening—removing that liquidity through bond selling or halting reinvestments—can compress excess liquidity and add support to the Dollar. Our attention now turns to whether the Fed chooses to accelerate or maintain its current drawdown pace.

So, in the coming sessions, we need to stay focused on two fronts. First, fresh signals from Fed speakers could tilt sentiment, particularly if they confirm stickier inflation concerns or hint at tolerating weaker job growth. Second, any updates from the China-US meeting, even if minor in tone, should be followed closely, especially for how they feed into broader risk sentiment. What traders should take from this, above all, is that policy clarity is scarce right now—and in markets, scarcity breeds volatility.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.

Trump has stated that a 10% tariff is the starting point in discussions, suggesting that future trade negotiations might not focus on reducing this rate. This 10% figure presents potential difficulties in finalising trade deals, considering Trump’s history of shifting his positions on tariffs.

ForexLive.com is transitioning to investingLive.com later this year. It aims to provide a new platform for comprehensive market updates and informed decision-making for traders and market participants.

Implications Of A 10 Percent Tariff

The existing commentary highlights Trump’s indication that a 10% tariff may serve not as an upper threshold but as a baseline in discussions. This implies a hardened stance on trade policy should he return to office. His approach, coupled with a tendency to recalibrate policy positions without much notice, introduces considerable unpredictability. For markets, such unpredictability tends to reduce transparency around supply chains, input costs, and future pricing assumptions. Moreover, Trump’s preference for using tariffs as a negotiation tool has historically impacted sentiment across bond yields, equity indices, and commodity-linked currencies.

The upcoming rebrand of ForexLive to investingLive.com signifies a broader focus, underscoring a commitment to more thorough real-time reporting beyond foreign exchange. Trading decisions may benefit from this shift, particularly if cross-asset relationships strengthen around policy headlines. We can expect more comprehensive insights tailored to global shifts in interest rates, trade dynamics, and fiscal policy changes.

For traders looking at derivatives, this moment demands a recalibration of short-term bias and positioning. We would avoid structuring exposure on assumptions of diplomacy reducing tariffs. Instead, it’s safer to anticipate that headline risk will continue to drive volatility, especially in sectors or regions sensitive to cross-border taxes and retaliatory measures. Volatility surfaces across near-term expiries are already showing signs of steepening, particularly in trades tied to industrial input names and major exporters.

Strategic Considerations For Traders

Given that any policy development feeds directly into implied pricing, it makes sense to keep delta exposure relatively light unless directional conviction is high. Clearly, any re-pricing of tariffs would be felt broadly: not just in equity premiums but in forward swap rates and currency pair skew. Risk reversals, for instance, are probably a more efficient way to express views while capping downside. We’ve noticed increased issuance in weekly and monthly puts across trade-sensitive ETFs, which supports this view.

Separately, with seasonality offering less reliability given event risk, it’s worth paying closer attention to the term structure of volatility. Dislocations in funding markets or forward FX curves may offer more signal than macro indicators alone. Powell’s recent tone suggests limited tolerance for shocks, further narrowing the reaction time for institutional desks.

Over the next few weeks, we’ll be monitoring skew changes across most liquid index options while watching for signs of heavier hedging flows in futures. There’s still scope to capitalise on mispriced implieds, especially if macro traders return from the sidelines. Yet it remains important to be tactical. We’re trading what we see, not what we expect.

Create your live VT Markets account and start trading now.